20978 lines
457 KiB
Markdown
20978 lines
457 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
type: document
|
||
title: Cumberland-Plateau-PDC-Roadmap-to-Economic-Resiliency
|
||
file: ../Cumberland-Plateau-PDC-Roadmap-to-Economic-Resiliency.pdf
|
||
tags:
|
||
- Cumberland_Plateau_Planning_District_Commission
|
||
docDate: null
|
||
contentType: application/pdf
|
||
contentLength: 34019712
|
||
sha256sum: d84695a3fed2b3e32c87ccadf0c84c2ed7ba7db3c44c99c2007a84672f378b32
|
||
sha1sum: 21cc5bfdc65a7e12f1d06076963b48bcee81554c
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
Roadmap to
|
||
|
||
Economic Resiliency
|
||
|
||
September 2021
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Planning District
|
||
|
||
Commission
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
Planning District
|
||
Commission
|
||
|
||
Roadmap to
|
||
Economic Resiliency
|
||
|
||
Ea eR ee HICKEYGLOBAR
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
003 - Executive Summary
|
||
|
||
007 - Stakeholder Engagement Responses
|
||
|
||
054 - Cluster Verification
|
||
|
||
083 - Asset Mapping
|
||
|
||
122 - Business Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
160 - Tourism Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
|
||
003 - Executive Summary
|
||
|
||
007 - Stakeholder Engagement Responses
|
||
054 - Cluster Verification
|
||
|
||
083 - Asset Mapping
|
||
|
||
122 - Business Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
160 - Tourism Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission engaged the help of Hickey Global in researching and analyzing economic opportunities and
|
||
|
||
concerns for business resiliency and recovery from economic shocks including the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to make these recommendations,
|
||
|
||
Hickey Global conducted stakeholder surveying, asset mapping, and cluster analysis within the region and combined these results with prevailing
|
||
|
||
industry research and thought.
|
||
|
||
This analysis revealed an image of a region with reliable legacy industries, cutting edge technological positioning, and rich natural beauty on which to
|
||
|
||
continue to capitalize. Also uncovered were opportunities in developing education, transportation infrastructure, and workforce engagement which
|
||
|
||
could lead to resiliency difficulties in the future if not adequately addressed. Overall, the Cumberland Plateau region is better situated than many similar
|
||
|
||
regions to maintain economic vibrancy in the face of economic shocks and possibly utilize current market conditions to grow into the future with remote
|
||
|
||
worker recruitment and strategic engagement with the current workforce.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder surveying was conducted in person and online over the course of two weeks and included representatives of small and large business
|
||
|
||
owners, local and regional officials, park staff, food and beverage industry, information technology sector, manufacturing and industrial sector,
|
||
|
||
accommodations and lodging, and economic development groups. 52% of those surveyed where in the private industry and tourism sector with 48% in
|
||
|
||
the government and non-profit sector. Stakeholders were evenly distributed across the region with 24% from Buchanan County, 29% from Dickenson
|
||
|
||
County, 35% from Tazewell County, and 18% from Russel County.
|
||
|
||
Surveying revealed that many groups had taken at least some amount of pandemic assistance funding with the most popular being PPP loans followed
|
||
|
||
by County and Town IDA Grants and Town Cares Act Grants at an even split for the second most popular. While the funding made available was listed as
|
||
|
||
a highlight of pandemic response in both the private industry and tourism sectors, stakeholders also noted the need for better community engagement
|
||
|
||
and flow of information in helping these industries learn about available programs and application and eligibility requirements. Notably, government and
|
||
|
||
non-profit entities also agreed that clarity of information flow would have made regional pandemic response more affective. Overall, government and
|
||
|
||
non-profit entities felt better informed about pandemic information and were gaining that information through official and more reliable sources. This
|
||
|
||
lead Hickey Global to suggest the structure of a pandemic response board for the region which could assess and appropriately disseminate information
|
||
|
||
from better informed local authorities to private and tourism industry stakeholders within the region.
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission engaged the help of Hickey Global in researching and analyzing economic opportunities and
|
||
concerns for business resiliency and recovery from economic shocks including the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to make these recommendations,
|
||
Hickey Global conducted stakeholder surveying, asset mapping, and cluster analysis within the region and combined these results with prevailing
|
||
industry research and thought.
|
||
|
||
This analysis revealed an image of a region with reliable legacy industries, cutting edge technological positioning, and rich natural beauty on which to
|
||
continue to capitalize. Also uncovered were opportunities in developing education, transportation infrastructure, and workforce engagement which
|
||
could lead to resiliency difficulties in the future if not adequately addressed. Overall, the Cumberland Plateau region is better situated than many similar
|
||
regions to maintain economic vibrancy in the face of economic shocks and possibly utilize current market conditions to grow into the future with remote
|
||
worker recruitment and strategic engagement with the current workforce.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder surveying was conducted in person and online over the course of two weeks and included representatives of small and large business
|
||
owners, local and regional officials, park staff, food and beverage industry, information technology sector, manufacturing and industrial sector,
|
||
accommodations and lodging, and economic development groups. 52% of those surveyed where in the private industry and tourism sector with 48% in
|
||
the government and non-profit sector. Stakeholders were evenly distributed across the region with 24% from Buchanan County, 29% from Dickenson
|
||
County, 35% from Tazewell County, and 18% from Russel County.
|
||
|
||
Surveying revealed that many groups had taken at least some amount of pandemic assistance funding with the most popular being PPP loans followed
|
||
by County and Town IDA Grants and Town Cares Act Grants at an even split for the second most popular. While the funding made available was listed as
|
||
a highlight of pandemic response in both the private industry and tourism sectors, stakeholders also noted the need for better community engagement
|
||
and flow of information in helping these industries learn about available programs and application and eligibility requirements. Notably, government and
|
||
non-profit entities also agreed that clarity of information flow would have made regional pandemic response more affective. Overall, government and
|
||
non-profit entities felt better informed about pandemic information and were gaining that information through official and more reliable sources. This
|
||
lead Hickey Global to suggest the structure of a pandemic response board for the region which could assess and appropriately disseminate information
|
||
from better informed local authorities to private and tourism industry stakeholders within the region.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
There was also agreement across stakeholder groups about workforce concerns and remote worker recruitment potential. All stakeholder groups
|
||
|
||
identified job opportunities and wages as primary reasons why workers may leave the region. There were also varying levels of causal weight given to
|
||
|
||
recreation opportunities in the area across stakeholder groups. While a very small percentage of jobs currently in the region were able to be transitioned
|
||
|
||
to remote work during the pandemic and an even smaller percentage are anticipated to remain remote, there is nearly universal support and belief across
|
||
|
||
stakeholder groups for a remote worker recruitment campaign to bring workers made permanently remote into the region. Hickey Global recommends
|
||
|
||
that this campaign be crafted to not only recruit workers but also to leverage best-in-class broadband capabilities to create IT pipelines for remote work
|
||
|
||
between the Cumberland Plateau region and companies in areas like Northern Virginia and Washington DC which could be attracted to the regions lower
|
||
|
||
labor costs.
|
||
|
||
Asset mapping revealed three primary assets which distinguish the region for workers and business recruitment—exceptional broadband capacity, low
|
||
|
||
cost of living and labor, and availability of outdoor recreation and natural beauty. These three key assets have also proven critical in the pandemic
|
||
|
||
recovery environment and can be immediately leveraged for growth as workers and companies are placing a higher value than ever on these assets. The
|
||
|
||
tourism industry can be particularly leveraged in regional recovery and resiliency efforts by making the region more attractive to a migrating workforce
|
||
|
||
and in helping to improve community services by becoming a catalyst for eliminating blight and advertising the community for potential relocation. This
|
||
|
||
would assist in mitigating two of the key regional deficiencies revealed by asset mapping—lower technology usage among households and lack of human
|
||
|
||
capitol.
|
||
|
||
Two additional key deficiencies were identified through asset mapping which should become a key focus of the region when planning for future
|
||
|
||
resiliency—transportation infrastructure and education including elementary school performance and low graduation rates from high-demand post-
|
||
|
||
secondary programs. Transportation infrastructure was identified as an essential resiliency area in both private industry and tourism sector assessment.
|
||
|
||
Current transportation infrastructure limits shipping access for materials and manufactured goods and limits tourist access to standout natural assets.
|
||
|
||
Investment in education would serve to propel the region’s investment in technology-based jobs. Additionally, high quality entrepreneurial education was
|
||
|
||
seen as a key need by private and tourism industry in ensuring the successful establishment and staying power of business in the region. Investment in
|
||
|
||
education within the region could serve to limit ‘brain-drain’ while also attracting new jobs to the region.
|
||
|
||
Asset mapping done on industrial parks in the region has shown good development and growth of industrial parks while noting some considerations for
|
||
|
||
future resiliency. Current industrial parks have good utility infrastructure planning and implementation with good strategy around reuse of existing “shell”
|
||
|
||
buildings. Key deficiencies are the size of available sites limiting larger scale projects and distance of existing parks from a major highway for efficient
|
||
|
||
transportation and general difficulty of road access.
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
There was also agreement across stakeholder groups about workforce concerns and remote worker recruitment potential. All stakeholder groups
|
||
identified job opportunities and wages as primary reasons why workers may leave the region. There were also varying levels of causal weight given to
|
||
recreation opportunities in the area across stakeholder groups. While a very small percentage of jobs currently in the region were able to be transitioned
|
||
to remote work during the pandemic and an even smaller percentage are anticipated to remain remote, there is nearly universal support and belief across
|
||
stakeholder groups for a remote worker recruitment campaign to bring workers made permanently remote into the region. Hickey Global recommends
|
||
that this campaign be crafted to not only recruit workers but also to leverage best-in-class broadband capabilities to create IT pipelines for remote work
|
||
between the Cumberland Plateau region and companies in areas like Northern Virginia and Washington DC which could be attracted to the regions lower
|
||
labor costs.
|
||
|
||
Asset mapping revealed three primary assets which distinguish the region for workers and business recruitment—exceptional broadband capacity, low
|
||
cost of living and labor, and availability of outdoor recreation and natural beauty. These three key assets have also proven critical in the pandemic
|
||
recovery environment and can be immediately leveraged for growth as workers and companies are placing a higher value than ever on these assets. The
|
||
tourism industry can be particularly leveraged in regional recovery and resiliency efforts by making the region more attractive to a migrating workforce
|
||
and in helping to improve community services by becoming a catalyst for eliminating blight and advertising the community for potential relocation. This
|
||
would assist in mitigating two of the key regional deficiencies revealed by asset mapping—lower technology usage among households and lack of human
|
||
capitol.
|
||
|
||
Two additional key deficiencies were identified through asset mapping which should become a key focus of the region when planning for future
|
||
resiliency—transportation infrastructure and education including elementary school performance and low graduation rates from high-demand post-
|
||
secondary programs. Transportation infrastructure was identified as an essential resiliency area in both private industry and tourism sector assessment.
|
||
Current transportation infrastructure limits shipping access for materials and manufactured goods and limits tourist access to standout natural assets.
|
||
Investment in education would serve to propel the region’s investment in technology-based jobs. Additionally, high quality entrepreneurial education was
|
||
seen as a key need by private and tourism industry in ensuring the successful establishment and staying power of business in the region. Investment in
|
||
education within the region could serve to limit ‘brain-drain’ while also attracting new jobs to the region.
|
||
|
||
Asset mapping done on industrial parks in the region has shown good development and growth of industrial parks while noting some considerations for
|
||
future resiliency. Current industrial parks have good utility infrastructure planning and implementation with good strategy around reuse of existing “shell”
|
||
buildings. Key deficiencies are the size of available sites limiting larger scale projects and distance of existing parks from a major highway for efficient
|
||
transportation and general difficulty of road access.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
Cluster studies identified six key clusters for regional growth. These clusters were also assessed against industry data from prior economic shocks and
|
||
|
||
shown to be acceptably diversified to work in combination to propel growth in the region without placing it in a precarious position for future resiliency.
|
||
|
||
The six key development clusters are mining, fabricated metal manufacturing, machinery and equipment manufacturing, shared services and IT, tourism,
|
||
|
||
and healthcare. Mining strategy should focus on growing demand for metal commodities, addressing pressing challenges within the industry growing the
|
||
|
||
area as a thought leader, and promoting current capabilities via an online database to advertising these capacities outside the region. Fabricated mental
|
||
|
||
manufacturing strategies should focus on expanding and marketing specialized knowledge within the region, investigate prototyping and product
|
||
|
||
customization, and piloting new technology in Industry 4.0 components. Machinery and equipment manufacturing strategy should center diversification
|
||
|
||
of mining manufacturers into new markets, developing this cluster portfolio by promoting key skills and inputs, and taking advantage of existing inputs to
|
||
|
||
reinforce the value chain. Shared services and IT should pursue growth by capitalizing on best-in-class broadband capabilities to recruit remote workers,
|
||
|
||
developing a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC, and training and supporting residents working from or wishing to work from
|
||
|
||
home. Tourism strategy should be centered around expanding infrastructure to increase access to natural and outdoor recreation assets, developing a
|
||
|
||
mixed accommodations industry with equal representation of RV parks, campgrounds, and traditional accommodations to improve resiliency, and tying
|
||
|
||
tourism offerings to more resilient regional enterprises such as agriculture and mining. Healthcare strategy should follow its current trajectory to cater to
|
||
|
||
an aging populace while leveraging the Appalachian College of Pharmacy to recruit on-line pharmacy operations such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
|
||
A healthcare leakage study is also recommended to determine needed or improved services within the region to ensure income created within the region
|
||
|
||
remains local.
|
||
|
||
Tourism strategy for the region was requested as a breakout industry with planning and suggestions made in support of this industry. Analysis revealed
|
||
|
||
that tourism in the region may be best thought of at present as aligned with resident needs. Larger tourism events can be leveraged to bring areas up to a
|
||
|
||
standard of readiness by mitigating blight and developing needed visitor services for the region. Resident support and patronage of new and existing
|
||
|
||
tourism ventures is critical within the region currently and is made more pressing during economic downturns. Tourism development should therefore
|
||
|
||
seek to benefit both groups equally. Outdoor recreation tourism should remain the focus of regional tourism development efforts as it has been shown to
|
||
|
||
be more resilient in a pandemic environment than other types of tourism and has been shown to increase area appeal for remote worker relocation.
|
||
|
||
Tourism development should be considered based on which key activity the area is question is best suited for. Visitor services can then be built out
|
||
|
||
around the central activity to ensure a tourism ecosystem which reduces leakage.
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Cluster studies identified six key clusters for regional growth. These clusters were also assessed against industry data from prior economic shocks and
|
||
shown to be acceptably diversified to work in combination to propel growth in the region without placing it in a precarious position for future resiliency.
|
||
The six key development clusters are mining, fabricated metal manufacturing, machinery and equipment manufacturing, shared services and IT, tourism,
|
||
and healthcare. Mining strategy should focus on growing demand for metal commodities, addressing pressing challenges within the industry growing the
|
||
area as a thought leader, and promoting current capabilities via an online database to advertising these capacities outside the region. Fabricated mental
|
||
manufacturing strategies should focus on expanding and marketing specialized knowledge within the region, investigate prototyping and product
|
||
customization, and piloting new technology in Industry 4.0 components. Machinery and equipment manufacturing strategy should center diversification
|
||
of mining manufacturers into new markets, developing this cluster portfolio by promoting key skills and inputs, and taking advantage of existing inputs to
|
||
reinforce the value chain. Shared services and IT should pursue growth by capitalizing on best-in-class broadband capabilities to recruit remote workers,
|
||
developing a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC, and training and supporting residents working from or wishing to work from
|
||
home. Tourism strategy should be centered around expanding infrastructure to increase access to natural and outdoor recreation assets, developing a
|
||
mixed accommodations industry with equal representation of RV parks, campgrounds, and traditional accommodations to improve resiliency, and tying
|
||
tourism offerings to more resilient regional enterprises such as agriculture and mining. Healthcare strategy should follow its current trajectory to cater to
|
||
an aging populace while leveraging the Appalachian College of Pharmacy to recruit on-line pharmacy operations such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
A healthcare leakage study is also recommended to determine needed or improved services within the region to ensure income created within the region
|
||
remains local.
|
||
|
||
Tourism strategy for the region was requested as a breakout industry with planning and suggestions made in support of this industry. Analysis revealed
|
||
that tourism in the region may be best thought of at present as aligned with resident needs. Larger tourism events can be leveraged to bring areas up to a
|
||
standard of readiness by mitigating blight and developing needed visitor services for the region. Resident support and patronage of new and existing
|
||
tourism ventures is critical within the region currently and is made more pressing during economic downturns. Tourism development should therefore
|
||
seek to benefit both groups equally. Outdoor recreation tourism should remain the focus of regional tourism development efforts as it has been shown to
|
||
be more resilient in a pandemic environment than other types of tourism and has been shown to increase area appeal for remote worker relocation.
|
||
Tourism development should be considered based on which key activity the area is question is best suited for. Visitor services can then be built out
|
||
around the central activity to ensure a tourism ecosystem which reduces leakage.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
Additionally, it was requested that Hickey Global propose a large-scale tourism asset for the region. To this end Hickey Global has laid out the foundations
|
||
|
||
and required support mechanisms to suggest the region capitalize on its preexisting assets by hosting a cycling rally. This rally would incorporate heritage
|
||
|
||
and agritourism stops with nights spent in each county to ensure full regional activation in planning and in economic benefit. Additional, proposed event
|
||
|
||
details and necessary support infrastructure aligns tourism needs with identified opportunities in other areas of the report as well as addressing identified
|
||
|
||
improvement areas. Tourism is most resilient when thoroughly supported by the host community and tied to key regional industries which are also proven
|
||
|
||
to be resilient.
|
||
|
||
These three key analysis exercises led to the creation of a private industry and tourism resiliency strategy which addresses historic and current market
|
||
|
||
disruptions and seeks to envision the Cumberland Plateau’s fiscally sustainable future. Information was used from the International Economic
|
||
|
||
Development Council’s work on disaster recovery, the US Travel Association’s work on mitigating pandemic impacts in tourism, and current research in
|
||
|
||
recovery and value shifts as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The visions of the future of the region revealed in stakeholder surveying were highly
|
||
|
||
aligned between business and community leaders. Business leaders envisioned increased livability, a strong industrial base, more people and jobs, and a
|
||
|
||
strong tourism economy. Community leaders envisioned new industry, more jobs, more people, and an expanded tourism industry. The furtherance of
|
||
|
||
these visions is found in recommendations presented in each section of this report based on stakeholder engagement, cluster analysis, asset mapping,
|
||
|
||
and tourism planning. These findings should be incorporated into regional and more localized preparedness plans which should be created to support
|
||
|
||
businesses during an economic crises and during the recovery process.
|
||
|
||
Greater detail on all of the assessment and recommendations made within this summery can be found in the sections of the report below which have
|
||
|
||
been divided out to show results and associated recommendations from each analytical assessment and recommended planning initiatives from business
|
||
|
||
and tourism resiliency.
|
||
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Recovery and Resiliency Planning for Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Additionally, it was requested that Hickey Global propose a large-scale tourism asset for the region. To this end Hickey Global has laid out the foundations
|
||
and required support mechanisms to suggest the region capitalize on its preexisting assets by hosting a cycling rally. This rally would incorporate heritage
|
||
and agritourism stops with nights spent in each county to ensure full regional activation in planning and in economic benefit. Additional, proposed event
|
||
|
||
details and necessary support infrastructure aligns tourism needs with identified opportunities in other areas of the report as well as addressing identified
|
||
|
||
improvement areas. Tourism is most resilient when thoroughly supported by the host community and tied to key regional industries which are also proven
|
||
to be resilient.
|
||
|
||
These three key analysis exercises led to the creation of a private industry and tourism resiliency strategy which addresses historic and current market
|
||
disruptions and seeks to envision the Cumberland Plateau’s fiscally sustainable future. Information was used from the International Economic
|
||
Development Council’s work on disaster recovery, the US Travel Association’s work on mitigating pandemic impacts in tourism, and current research in
|
||
recovery and value shifts as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The visions of the future of the region revealed in stakeholder surveying were highly
|
||
aligned between business and community leaders. Business leaders envisioned increased livability, a strong industrial base, more people and jobs, anda
|
||
strong tourism economy. Community leaders envisioned new industry, more jobs, more people, and an expanded tourism industry. The furtherance of
|
||
these visions is found in recommendations presented in each section of this report based on stakeholder engagement, cluster analysis, asset mapping,
|
||
and tourism planning. These findings should be incorporated into regional and more localized preparedness plans which should be created to support
|
||
businesses during an economic crises and during the recovery process.
|
||
|
||
Greater detail on all of the assessment and recommendations made within this summery can be found in the sections of the report below which have
|
||
been divided out to show results and associated recommendations from each analytical assessment and recommended planning initiatives from business
|
||
and tourism resiliency.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
Responses received May 17
|
||
through May 28, 2021
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Planning District
|
||
|
||
Commission
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
Planning District
|
||
Commission
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
Sie Ae eee HICKEYGLOBAL
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
8
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Response Findings
|
||
|
||
‣Both sectors agreed that better information flows and better clarity of
|
||
|
||
information would improve future responses.
|
||
|
||
‣Private businesses also had numerous comments on improving
|
||
|
||
financial support while it was barely mentioned on public
|
||
|
||
responses. However, the private sector did list Funding as what was
|
||
|
||
done well during the response.
|
||
|
||
‣The private sector also gave high marks to Health Services.
|
||
|
||
‣Government officials relied heavy on Federal, State and Local
|
||
|
||
government sources for pandemic information. Private business used
|
||
|
||
more sources for their information but also listed the Government as
|
||
|
||
their main source of information.
|
||
|
||
‣Overwhelmingly, respondents felt adequately informed by their
|
||
|
||
sources.
|
||
|
||
‣For private businesses, only 31 percent of their workforce transitioned
|
||
|
||
to working from home during the pandemic. Moving forward,
|
||
|
||
businesses might or will transition up to 16 percent to home-based
|
||
|
||
work.
|
||
|
||
‣There is tremendous support by all respondents for a remote-worker
|
||
|
||
recruitment campaign to increase population and wealth in the area.
|
||
|
||
‣Businesses cite job availability and wages as why they lose workers to
|
||
|
||
other companies or out of the region.
|
||
|
||
‣Government leaders also think job opportunities and wages are a
|
||
|
||
reasons why workers leave the region. They also think lack of things to
|
||
|
||
do, shopping and healthcare contribute.
|
||
|
||
‣71 percent of private businesses are having challenges rehiring or
|
||
|
||
hiring employees with many listing Federal aid as the reason.
|
||
|
||
‣Considering new businesses that would do well in the area, the top
|
||
|
||
responses were industry, restaurants, accommodations, and outdoor
|
||
|
||
recreation.
|
||
|
||
‣For public leaders, infrastructure needs focused on continuing to
|
||
|
||
increase broadband in the region.
|
||
|
||
‣Private sector leaders focused more on support programs for business,
|
||
|
||
education & training and entrepreneurship.
|
||
|
||
‣To strengthen the tourism industry, more guides & outfitters, better food
|
||
|
||
offerings and more retail & lodging received most of the responses.
|
||
|
||
‣ In envisioning the future, the top responses were more people & jobs,
|
||
|
||
increased livability, a strong tourism economy, and a strong industrial
|
||
|
||
base.
|
||
|
||
takeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
esponse Findings
|
||
|
||
> Both sectors agreed that better information flows and better clarity of
|
||
information would improve future responses.
|
||
|
||
» Private businesses also had numerous comments on improving
|
||
financial support while it was barely mentioned on public
|
||
responses. However, the private sector did list Funding as what was
|
||
done well during the response.
|
||
|
||
» The private sector also gave high marks to Health Services.
|
||
|
||
>» Government officials relied heavy on Federal, State and Local
|
||
government sources for pandemic information. Private business used
|
||
more sources for their information but also listed the Government as
|
||
their main source of information.
|
||
|
||
> Overwhelmingly, respondents felt adequately informed by their
|
||
sources.
|
||
|
||
> For private businesses, only 31 percent of their workforce transitioned
|
||
to working from home during the pandemic. Moving forward,
|
||
businesses might or will transition up to 16 percent to home-based
|
||
work.
|
||
|
||
> There is tremendous support by all respondents for a remote-worker
|
||
recruitment campaign to increase population and wealth in the area.
|
||
|
||
» Businesses cite job availability and wages as why they lose workers to
|
||
other companies or out of the region.
|
||
|
||
>» Government leaders also think job opportunities and wages are a
|
||
reasons why workers leave the region. They also think lack of things to
|
||
do, shopping and healthcare contribute.
|
||
|
||
>» 71 percent of private businesses are having challenges rehiring or
|
||
hiring employees with many listing Federal aid as the reason.
|
||
|
||
> Considering new businesses that would do well in the area, the top
|
||
responses were industry, restaurants, accommodations, and outdoor
|
||
recreation.
|
||
|
||
> For public leaders, infrastructure needs focused on continuing to
|
||
increase broadband in the region.
|
||
|
||
» Private sector leaders focused more on support programs for business,
|
||
education & training and entrepreneurship.
|
||
|
||
> To strengthen the tourism industry, more guides & outfitters, better food
|
||
offerings and more retail & lodging received most of the responses.
|
||
|
||
> In envisioning the future, the top responses were more people & jobs,
|
||
increased livability, a strong tourism economy, and a strong industrial
|
||
base.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Private and Government Sectors
|
||
|
||
The overall response rate
|
||
|
||
was 49% with responses
|
||
|
||
almost evenly split between
|
||
|
||
the Private and Government
|
||
|
||
sectors.
|
||
|
||
Government & Non-profit
|
||
48%
|
||
|
||
Private & Tourism Sectors
|
||
52%
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder insights are a very important element in developing a resiliency plan. Stakeholders provided
|
||
|
||
input during in person and small group meetings and through an online survey platform.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Private and Government Sectors
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder insights are a very important element in developing a resiliency plan. Stakeholders provided
|
||
input during in person and small group meetings and through an online survey platform.
|
||
|
||
Government & Non-profit
|
||
° The overall response rate
|
||
48%
|
||
|
||
was 49% with responses
|
||
almost evenly split between
|
||
the Private and Government
|
||
|
||
Private & Tourism Sectors
|
||
52%
|
||
|
||
sectors.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
Private and Tourism Sector
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Private and Tourism Sector
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
11
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Industry Breakdown
|
||
|
||
Parks & Recreation
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Information Technology
|
||
(Call Centers)
|
||
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Accommodations
|
||
& Lodging
|
||
12%
|
||
|
||
Arts &
|
||
Entertainment
|
||
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Food & Beverage
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Retail
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing & Industrial
|
||
35%
|
||
|
||
Stake older Feedback
|
||
Inaus
|
||
|
||
try Breakdown
|
||
|
||
Parks & Recreation .
|
||
6% Accommodations
|
||
& Lodging Arts &
|
||
Information Technology 12% Entertainment
|
||
(Call Centers) 6%
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Food & Beverage
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing & Industrial
|
||
35%
|
||
|
||
Retail
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
a
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
12
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Location
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County
|
||
24% Dickenson County
|
||
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Russel County
|
||
18%Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
35%
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Location
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County
|
||
24%
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Russel County
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County 18%
|
||
|
||
35%
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
COVID-19 Assistance
|
||
|
||
Did you use or receive
|
||
|
||
assistance from pandemic
|
||
|
||
response programs?
|
||
County/Town IDA Grant
|
||
|
||
23%
|
||
|
||
PPP
|
||
46%
|
||
|
||
Town Cares Act Grant
|
||
23%
|
||
|
||
Cumberland RLF
|
||
4% Rebuild VA Program
|
||
|
||
(State Grant)
|
||
4%
|
||
|
||
SKB ggesback
|
||
|
||
Cumberland RLF
|
||
4% Rebuild VA Program
|
||
|
||
/ (State Grant)
|
||
|
||
Did you use or receive
|
||
assistance from pandemic
|
||
|
||
County/Town IDA Grant
|
||
response programs?
|
||
|
||
23%
|
||
|
||
4%
|
||
|
||
PPP
|
||
|
||
46%
|
||
Town Cares Act Grant
|
||
|
||
23%
|
||
|
||
13,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
14
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
More Effective Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
• More involvement from county and town. Feels like business owners
|
||
|
||
are on their own.
|
||
|
||
• Coordination between States (border communities).
|
||
|
||
• Need better regional connection to SBDC.
|
||
|
||
• Needed better pandemic exit strategy.
|
||
|
||
Community Involvement
|
||
|
||
• Education component was missing.
|
||
|
||
• Rules and actual business education around response and
|
||
|
||
guideline.
|
||
|
||
• Education on the vaccines was lacking.
|
||
|
||
• More information on actual guidelines as well as information on the
|
||
|
||
reasoning behind those guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Banks not informed of grant guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Better instructions
|
||
|
||
• Not much guidance on how to handle COVID guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• No singular vision for how to handle restrictions and get educated on
|
||
|
||
health needs and safety standards.
|
||
|
||
• No clear leadership from health department on business specific
|
||
|
||
guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Better information
|
||
|
||
• Difficult to maintain policies for staff and guests due to lack of time,
|
||
|
||
depth of info, lack of clarification.
|
||
|
||
• Target businesses specifically for information.
|
||
|
||
• Need better local information source.
|
||
|
||
• More timely information. Announcements on Friday evenings after
|
||
|
||
close not helpful because you couldn't receive further guidance.
|
||
|
||
Information
|
||
|
||
• Better promotion and active engagement with marketing materials
|
||
|
||
especially when put online.
|
||
|
||
• Instead of pouring money into individual payments, preferred to see
|
||
|
||
the community colleges funded and staffed with educational
|
||
|
||
programs that can provide skilled workers to the manufacturing
|
||
|
||
industry.
|
||
|
||
• PPE availability.
|
||
|
||
• More testing needed.
|
||
|
||
• Help with Supply Chain issues.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• Would've liked more county support for grants through pandemic
|
||
|
||
and into the future. Matching through VCEDA.
|
||
|
||
• State grant assistance and PPP wasn't sufficient for small business
|
||
|
||
needs
|
||
|
||
• Funding a vocational skills program would have been essential to
|
||
|
||
post pandemic recovery.
|
||
|
||
• Difficulty to get money through larger funds due to restrictions
|
||
|
||
around qualifications.
|
||
|
||
• Resources got a bit swamped, and grant systems got overwhelmed.
|
||
|
||
• Costs went up due to reinvestment in businesses and that wasn't
|
||
|
||
covered by grant funding.
|
||
|
||
• Had to make an investment to meet COVID standards without
|
||
|
||
sufficient funding support for those needs.
|
||
|
||
• Filled out numerous grants but got bumped back due to grant
|
||
|
||
qualifications. Feels like a waste of time.
|
||
|
||
• Help with upfront costs to new business to meet pandemic needs.
|
||
|
||
• People had no information that grant money was being made
|
||
|
||
available.
|
||
|
||
• Needed funding faster.
|
||
|
||
Cost
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
More Effective Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
Information =
|
||
|
||
Education component was missing.
|
||
|
||
Rules and actual business education around response and
|
||
guideline.
|
||
|
||
Education on the vaccines was lacking.
|
||
|
||
More information on actual guidelines as well as information on the
|
||
reasoning behind those guidelines.
|
||
|
||
Banks not informed of grant guidelines.
|
||
Better instructions
|
||
Not much guidance on how to handle COVID guidelines.
|
||
|
||
No singular vision for how to handle restrictions and get educated on
|
||
health needs and safety standards.
|
||
|
||
No clear leadership from health department on business specific
|
||
guidelines.
|
||
|
||
Better information
|
||
|
||
Difficult to maintain policies for staff and guests due to lack of time,
|
||
depth of info, lack of clarification.
|
||
|
||
Target businesses specifically for information.
|
||
Need better local information source.
|
||
|
||
More timely information. Announcements on Friday evenings after
|
||
close not helpful because you couldn't receive further guidance.
|
||
|
||
Community Involvement
|
||
|
||
More involvement from county and town. Feels like business owners
|
||
are on their own.
|
||
|
||
Coordination between States (border communities).
|
||
Need better regional connection to SBDC.
|
||
Needed better pandemic exit strategy.
|
||
|
||
14
|
||
|
||
Cost
|
||
|
||
» Would've liked more county support for grants through pandemic
|
||
and into the future. Matching through VCEDA.
|
||
|
||
« State grant assistance and PPP wasn't sufficient for small business
|
||
needs
|
||
|
||
* Funding a vocational skills program would have been essential to
|
||
post pandemic recovery.
|
||
|
||
° Difficulty to get money through larger funds due to restrictions
|
||
around qualifications.
|
||
|
||
» Resources got a bit swamped, and grant systems got overwhelmed.
|
||
|
||
* Costs went up due to reinvestment in businesses and that wasn't
|
||
covered by grant funding.
|
||
|
||
» Had to make an investment to meet COVID standards without
|
||
sufficient funding support for those needs.
|
||
|
||
« Filled out numerous grants but got bumped back due to grant
|
||
qualifications. Feels like a waste of time.
|
||
|
||
- Help with upfront costs to new business to meet pandemic needs.
|
||
|
||
- People had no information that grant money was being made
|
||
available.
|
||
|
||
» Needed funding faster.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
» Better promotion and active engagement with marketing materials
|
||
especially when put online.
|
||
|
||
Instead of pouring money into individual payments, preferred to see
|
||
the community colleges funded and staffed with educational
|
||
programs that can provide skilled workers to the manufacturing
|
||
industry.
|
||
|
||
PPE availability.
|
||
|
||
More testing needed.
|
||
|
||
Help with Supply Chain issues.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
15
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Business-related pandemic response
|
||
|
||
And what was done well
|
||
|
||
(with region's business-
|
||
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
|
||
response efforts)?
|
||
|
||
• Board of supervisors were supportive of businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Help with navigating the language of the mandates.
|
||
|
||
• County tourism called to check in on reopening; fairly
|
||
|
||
regular communications.
|
||
|
||
• Everyone worked together.
|
||
|
||
• Overall, good. Proactive reach out.
|
||
|
||
Community Response
|
||
|
||
• Grant funding was well run and distributed effectively.
|
||
|
||
• CARES money was distributed well.
|
||
|
||
• IDA had funds available quickly. Application process was
|
||
|
||
very easy.
|
||
|
||
• Turnaround on funds was fast to get people reopened.
|
||
|
||
• Grant access was smooth and there was assistance in
|
||
|
||
getting funding.
|
||
|
||
• PPP distribution was done well. Business wouldn't have
|
||
|
||
survived without it.
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau provided me with easy access to
|
||
|
||
funds to build our capabilities which allowed me to hire
|
||
|
||
additional workers.
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
|
||
• Promotion for grant programs was done well.
|
||
|
||
• UVA Wise program helped to develop a website.
|
||
|
||
• Mask billboards did well.
|
||
|
||
Marketing
|
||
|
||
• Did a great job working with local health department on what
|
||
|
||
was expected.
|
||
|
||
• Health care stepped up with testing.
|
||
|
||
• Vaccine rollout did well.
|
||
|
||
• Contact with local health department office and covid clinics.
|
||
|
||
• Acted quickly to protect the aging population.
|
||
|
||
• Rollout of the vaccines went well.
|
||
|
||
• Hands-on health department. Had active outreach from
|
||
|
||
health department for events.
|
||
|
||
Health Services
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Business-related pandemic response
|
||
|
||
And what was done well —-Fuiding —_-_________________ Health Services
|
||
|
||
* Grant funding was well run and distributed effectively. * Did a great job working with local health department on what
|
||
. . ' .
|
||
(with region's business- » CARES money was distributed well. was expected.
|
||
related pandemic + IDA had funds available quickly. Application process was * Health care stepped up with testing.
|
||
|
||
very easy. Vaccine rollout did well.
|
||
|
||
response efforts)?
|
||
|
||
* Turnaround on funds was fast to get people reopened. Contact with local health department office and covid clinics.
|
||
|
||
* Grant access was smooth and there was assistance in
|
||
getting funding.
|
||
|
||
Acted quickly to protect the aging population.
|
||
|
||
Rollout of the vaccines went well.
|
||
« PPP distribution was done well. Business wouldn't have
|
||
survived without it.
|
||
|
||
Hands-on health department. Had active outreach from
|
||
health department for events.
|
||
* The Cumberland Plateau provided me with easy access to
|
||
|
||
funds to build our capabilities which allowed me to hire
|
||
|
||
additional workers.
|
||
|
||
Community Response Marketing
|
||
|
||
¢ Board of supervisors were supportive of businesses. « Promotion for grant programs was done well.
|
||
° Help with navigating the language of the mandates. » UVA Wise program helped to develop a website.
|
||
* County tourism called to check in on reopening; fairly ° Mask billboards did well.
|
||
|
||
regular communications.
|
||
« Everyone worked together.
|
||
|
||
° Overall, good. Proactive reach out.
|
||
|
||
15
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
16
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Sources
|
||
|
||
What sources did you
|
||
|
||
use to gain information
|
||
|
||
about pandemic
|
||
|
||
response, guidelines,
|
||
|
||
and recovery resources?
|
||
|
||
• CDC website.
|
||
|
||
• SBA website
|
||
|
||
• County did active outreach.
|
||
|
||
• County website
|
||
|
||
• CDC website
|
||
|
||
• SBDC
|
||
|
||
• Workforce Development Board
|
||
|
||
• Used small business assistance center at the
|
||
|
||
college.
|
||
|
||
• County officials
|
||
|
||
• Heart of Appalachian pushed out recovery
|
||
|
||
information and grant funding
|
||
|
||
• State briefings
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• Workforce board
|
||
|
||
• Workforce development board
|
||
|
||
• Press releases from governor's office
|
||
|
||
• DCR had updated and recently refreshed
|
||
|
||
documents.
|
||
|
||
• Received information from the county with
|
||
|
||
emails.
|
||
|
||
• IDA let owners know about grant program.
|
||
|
||
• CDC website.
|
||
|
||
• Governor’s press conferences.
|
||
|
||
• Local health department on local guidelines and
|
||
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
• Health department for information.
|
||
|
||
• Straight from health department.
|
||
|
||
• Health department guidance. Although
|
||
|
||
sometimes document would be issued and then
|
||
|
||
changes.
|
||
|
||
• Health department provided information, but also
|
||
|
||
acted as enforcement.
|
||
|
||
Government & Nonprofit
|
||
• Person to person.
|
||
|
||
• Word of mouth
|
||
|
||
• Word of mouth
|
||
|
||
• Lots of word of mouth.
|
||
|
||
Person-to-Person
|
||
|
||
• Online news sources.
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Emails
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
• Found out about grants through Facebook.
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
Online
|
||
|
||
• CPA did application for PPP.
|
||
|
||
• Information on loans from local banks.
|
||
|
||
• Accountant
|
||
|
||
• Chamber
|
||
|
||
• Chamber emails.
|
||
|
||
• SVAM - Southwest Virginia Association of
|
||
|
||
Manufactures
|
||
|
||
Professionals & Organizations
|
||
|
||
• News
|
||
|
||
• National news but messages were
|
||
|
||
very mixed.
|
||
|
||
• News
|
||
|
||
• General news sources.
|
||
|
||
• Newspaper
|
||
|
||
News
|
||
|
||
• Made a lot of outgoing calls to prepare
|
||
|
||
and ensure within compliance.
|
||
|
||
• Dual state situation required multi-
|
||
|
||
state coordination. KY and VA
|
||
|
||
response differences.
|
||
|
||
• Consultant stayed up on information
|
||
|
||
and pushed that out.
|
||
|
||
• No common leadership sources of
|
||
|
||
information.
|
||
|
||
• Corporate HQ.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
takeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
ources
|
||
. Government & Nonprofit Person-to-Person News
|
||
What sources did you CDG webs
|
||
. ebsite. * Person to person. « News
|
||
|
||
use to gain information
|
||
about pandemic
|
||
response, guidelines,
|
||
and recovery resources?
|
||
|
||
* SBA website
|
||
|
||
* County did active outreach.
|
||
|
||
* County website
|
||
|
||
» CDC website
|
||
|
||
* SBDC
|
||
|
||
* Workforce Development Board
|
||
|
||
» Used small business assistance center at the
|
||
college.
|
||
|
||
* County officials
|
||
|
||
* Heart of Appalachian pushed out recovery
|
||
information and grant funding
|
||
|
||
* State briefings
|
||
|
||
+ CDC
|
||
|
||
* Workforce board
|
||
|
||
° Workforce development board
|
||
|
||
* Press releases from governor's office
|
||
|
||
* DCR had updated and recently refreshed
|
||
documents.
|
||
|
||
* Received information from the county with
|
||
emails.
|
||
|
||
* IDA let owners know about grant program.
|
||
|
||
» CDC website.
|
||
|
||
* Governor's press conferences.
|
||
|
||
* Local health department on local guidelines and
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
° Health department for information.
|
||
|
||
* Straight from health department.
|
||
|
||
* Health department guidance. Although
|
||
sometimes document would be issued and then
|
||
changes.
|
||
|
||
* Health department provided information, but also
|
||
acted as enforcement.
|
||
|
||
16
|
||
|
||
* Word of mouth
|
||
* Word of mouth
|
||
* Lots of word of mouth.
|
||
|
||
Online
|
||
|
||
* Online news sources.
|
||
|
||
* Internet
|
||
|
||
* Internet
|
||
|
||
* Internet
|
||
|
||
Internet
|
||
|
||
° Emails
|
||
|
||
* Facebook
|
||
|
||
* Found out about grants through Facebook.
|
||
* Facebook
|
||
|
||
Professionals & Organizations
|
||
* CPA did application for PPP.
|
||
Information on loans from local banks.
|
||
|
||
Accountant
|
||
Chamber
|
||
Chamber emails.
|
||
|
||
SVAM - Southwest Virginia Association of
|
||
Manufactures
|
||
|
||
National news but messages were
|
||
very mixed.
|
||
|
||
News
|
||
|
||
General news sources.
|
||
|
||
Newspaper
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
» Made a lot of outgoing calls to prepare
|
||
and ensure within compliance.
|
||
|
||
° Dual state situation required multi-
|
||
state coordination. KY and VA
|
||
response differences.
|
||
|
||
* Consultant stayed up on information
|
||
and pushed that out.
|
||
|
||
» No common leadership sources of
|
||
information.
|
||
|
||
* Corporate HQ.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
17
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Information Sources
|
||
|
||
And did you feel adequately
|
||
|
||
informed by those sources?
|
||
|
||
Somewhat
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
No
|
||
18%
|
||
|
||
Sta kehol er Feedback
|
||
|
||
nis ormation Sources
|
||
|
||
And did you feel adequately
|
||
informed by those sources?
|
||
|
||
Somewhat
|
||
|
||
17
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
18
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Remote Workforce
|
||
|
||
What percentage of your
|
||
|
||
workforce transitioned to
|
||
|
||
remote work at the height of
|
||
|
||
the pandemic?
|
||
|
||
75 to 95
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
Zero
|
||
69%
|
||
|
||
10 to 25
|
||
23%
|
||
|
||
tak he r Feedback
|
||
|
||
emote gids orce
|
||
|
||
What percentage of your 75 to 95
|
||
workforce transitioned to 8%
|
||
remote work at the height of
|
||
the pandemic?
|
||
|
||
18
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
19
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Remote Workforce - Permanent
|
||
|
||
What percentage of your
|
||
|
||
workforce could or will
|
||
|
||
transition on a permanent
|
||
|
||
basis?
|
||
|
||
26 to 50
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
Zero
|
||
85%
|
||
|
||
10 to 25
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
Stokenolder, Feedback
|
||
|
||
emote ermanent
|
||
|
||
What percentage of your
|
||
workforce could or will
|
||
transition on a permanent
|
||
basis?
|
||
|
||
10 to 25
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
26 to 50
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
19
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
20
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Remote Workforce - Permanent
|
||
|
||
If the region embarked on
|
||
|
||
an aggressive remote-
|
||
|
||
worker recruitment
|
||
|
||
campaign to import a tech-
|
||
|
||
savvy workforce, would it
|
||
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
Yes
|
||
82%
|
||
|
||
No
|
||
18%
|
||
|
||
Stokenelggs Feesoack
|
||
|
||
emote ermanent
|
||
|
||
If the region embarked on
|
||
an aggressive remote-
|
||
worker recruitment
|
||
campaign to import a tech-
|
||
savvy workforce, would it
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
20
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
21
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Why or Why Not?
|
||
|
||
… if the region embarked
|
||
|
||
on an aggressive
|
||
|
||
remote-worker
|
||
|
||
recruitment campaign to
|
||
|
||
import a tech-savvy
|
||
|
||
workforce, would it
|
||
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
• There would be a substantial increase in outsiders settling in the area.
|
||
|
||
• Has seen an increase since the pandemic in remote workers coming to
|
||
|
||
town for travel.
|
||
|
||
• Would help with population loss.
|
||
|
||
• Would be helpful for locals increasing restaurant demand.
|
||
|
||
• Area offers low cost of living.
|
||
|
||
• Would assist with building back population base.
|
||
|
||
• More time and space to remote work because the commute is replaced
|
||
|
||
by time to enjoy the community.
|
||
|
||
• Tax dollar improvement. Additional local support for businesses and
|
||
|
||
buying power of new people coming into town.
|
||
|
||
• Already seeing some remote worker resettlement in the area.
|
||
|
||
• Brings in young people with children.
|
||
|
||
• Anything to get more people to live here.
|
||
|
||
• Yes, for tech savvy and general workers.
|
||
|
||
• Need more workers in skilled labor in addition to tech.
|
||
|
||
• Need IT and cybersecurity staff - FT and PT
|
||
|
||
• Need IT skills and drafting and engineering.
|
||
|
||
• Already seeing remote worker relocation.
|
||
|
||
• Interest in purchasing vacation homes first and then working remote.
|
||
|
||
• Stemming young population decline and replacing it with remote work.
|
||
|
||
• Bringing population in from outside to maintain houses and the area.
|
||
|
||
• Could help support service industry.
|
||
|
||
• Bring in industry, ideas and experience with new people coming into
|
||
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
• Need more technology and marketing workers.
|
||
|
||
• See more engagement with remote workers who are looking for a break.
|
||
|
||
• See temporary workers wanting to stay.
|
||
|
||
• More tax base.
|
||
|
||
• Fill empty available housing.
|
||
|
||
• Have seen some remote workers. Can envision a workforce that wants
|
||
|
||
to get away from it all but can also work remotely. Wifi allows that ability.
|
||
|
||
• Could see the business benefiting, have had some remote workers work
|
||
|
||
from the campsite.
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
• May become a challenge with housing availability. Rental properties are
|
||
|
||
hard to come by.
|
||
|
||
• Worried about quality of life.
|
||
|
||
• Looking to draw in more industry in the county.
|
||
|
||
• Would love to see the county invest in outdoor recreation tourism instead.
|
||
|
||
• This region is specifically suited for hands on workers. The tech sector
|
||
|
||
requires access to high-speed infrastructure which does not exist in this
|
||
|
||
county.
|
||
|
||
• No great housing options, most need renovation.
|
||
|
||
• Our workers built mines and powered the country. We need to capitalize
|
||
|
||
on those inherent skills.
|
||
|
||
• Just need basic trainable workers.
|
||
|
||
• Region has challenges with remote work options, improving access to fast
|
||
|
||
internet.
|
||
|
||
• Cell service.
|
||
|
||
• Most people visiting see it as being too far away from major population
|
||
|
||
centers and services.
|
||
|
||
Why Not?
|
||
|
||
ya! kehplder feed back
|
||
|
||
... if the region embarked
|
||
on an aggressive
|
||
remote-worker
|
||
recruitment campaign to
|
||
import a tech-savvy
|
||
workforce, would it
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
There would be a substantial increase in outsiders settling in the area.
|
||
|
||
Has seen an increase since the pandemic in remote workers coming to
|
||
town for travel.
|
||
|
||
Would help with population loss.
|
||
|
||
Would be helpful for locals increasing restaurant demand.
|
||
Area offers low cost of living.
|
||
|
||
Would assist with building back population base.
|
||
|
||
More time and space to remote work because the commute is replaced
|
||
by time to enjoy the community.
|
||
|
||
Tax dollar improvement. Additional local support for businesses and
|
||
buying power of new people coming into town.
|
||
|
||
Already seeing some remote worker resettlement in the area.
|
||
Brings in young people with children.
|
||
|
||
Anything to get more people to live here.
|
||
|
||
Yes, for tech savvy and general workers.
|
||
|
||
Need more workers in skilled labor in addition to tech.
|
||
|
||
Need IT and cybersecurity staff - FT and PT
|
||
|
||
* Need IT skills and drafting and engineering.
|
||
|
||
* Already seeing remote worker relocation.
|
||
|
||
* Interest in purchasing vacation homes first and then working remote.
|
||
* Stemming young population decline and replacing it with remote work.
|
||
* Bringing population in from outside to maintain houses and the area.
|
||
|
||
* Could help support service industry.
|
||
|
||
* Bring in industry, ideas and experience with new people coming into
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
* Need more technology and marketing workers.
|
||
|
||
» See more engagement with remote workers who are looking for a break.
|
||
* See temporary workers wanting to stay.
|
||
|
||
» More tax base.
|
||
|
||
* Fill empty available housing.
|
||
|
||
» Have seen some remote workers. Can envision a workforce that wants
|
||
to get away from it all but can also work remotely. Wifi allows that ability.
|
||
|
||
* Could see the business benefiting, have had some remote workers work
|
||
from the campsite.
|
||
|
||
Why Not?
|
||
|
||
May become a challenge with housing availability. Rental properties are
|
||
hard to come by.
|
||
|
||
Worried about quality of life.
|
||
Looking to draw in more industry in the county.
|
||
Would love to see the county invest in outdoor recreation tourism instead.
|
||
|
||
This region is specifically suited for hands on workers. The tech sector
|
||
requires access to high-speed infrastructure which does not exist in this
|
||
county.
|
||
|
||
No great housing options, most need renovation.
|
||
|
||
21
|
||
|
||
Our workers built mines and powered the country. We need to capitalize
|
||
on those inherent skills.
|
||
|
||
Just need basic trainable workers.
|
||
|
||
Region has challenges with remote work options, improving access to fast
|
||
internet.
|
||
|
||
Cell service.
|
||
|
||
Most people visiting see it as being too far away from major population
|
||
centers and services.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
22
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Factors in Losing Employees
|
||
|
||
If your company is
|
||
|
||
routinely losing quality
|
||
|
||
employees, what are
|
||
|
||
they telling you about
|
||
|
||
the factors that led to
|
||
|
||
those decisions?
|
||
|
||
• Fighting against government unemployment.
|
||
|
||
• No real issues with people leaving prior to pandemic. Now,
|
||
|
||
employees requested layoffs to collect unemployment
|
||
|
||
Unemployment Benefits
|
||
|
||
• Issues with minimum wage increase.
|
||
|
||
• Wage issues
|
||
|
||
• Wages
|
||
|
||
• Job availability and wages availability.
|
||
|
||
• Job availability- seasonality
|
||
|
||
• Leave because they need more hours.
|
||
|
||
• Work is a draw, but as options dry up, people are leaving.
|
||
|
||
Job Related
|
||
|
||
• Nothing to do. More activities needed.
|
||
|
||
• Lebanon is so close to Bristol and Abington that people go
|
||
|
||
there on the weekends and end up moving there.
|
||
|
||
• Housing
|
||
|
||
• Lack of daycare
|
||
|
||
• State parks and tourism have high turnover with seasonal
|
||
|
||
employees.
|
||
|
||
• Younger population isn't seeing as much opportunity and
|
||
|
||
are going to larger cities for shopping, restaurants,
|
||
|
||
attractions.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• Losing to other companies for driving distance or pay.
|
||
|
||
• To another business because not a good fit with work.
|
||
|
||
• Go to another employer for more money and less hours.
|
||
|
||
• Just go to other businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Bigger factories are drawing people out of the area. All work
|
||
|
||
related
|
||
|
||
• People leaving the area are heading to Alabama and
|
||
|
||
Pennsylvania for more steady and higher paid coal mining
|
||
|
||
jobs.
|
||
|
||
Other Companies
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
actors in Losing Employees
|
||
|
||
If your company is Job Related Other Companies
|
||
|
||
« Issues with minimum wage increase. « Losing to other companies for driving distance or pay.
|
||
|
||
routinely losing quality
|
||
employees, what are
|
||
they telling you about
|
||
the factors that led to
|
||
those decisions?
|
||
|
||
- Wage issues To another business because not a good fit with work.
|
||
|
||
Wages Go to another employer for more money and less hours.
|
||
|
||
Job availability and wages availability. Just go to other businesses.
|
||
|
||
Job availability- seasonality Bigger factories are drawing people out of the area. All work
|
||
|
||
related
|
||
|
||
Leave because they need more hours.
|
||
|
||
People leaving the area are heading to Alabama and
|
||
Pennsylvania for more steady and higher paid coal mining
|
||
jobs.
|
||
|
||
Work is a draw, but as options dry up, people are leaving.
|
||
|
||
Unemployment Benefits Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
* Fighting against government unemployment. » Nothing to do. More activities needed.
|
||
» No real issues with people leaving prior to pandemic. Now, * Lebanon is so close to Bristol and Abington that people go
|
||
employees requested layoffs to collect unemployment there on the weekends and end up moving there.
|
||
° Housing
|
||
|
||
* Lack of daycare
|
||
|
||
« State parks and tourism have high turnover with seasonal
|
||
employees.
|
||
|
||
« Younger population isn't seeing as much opportunity and
|
||
are going to larger cities for shopping, restaurants,
|
||
attractions.
|
||
|
||
22
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
23
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Challenges Rehiring or Hiring Employees
|
||
|
||
Are you having challenges
|
||
|
||
rehiring or hiring
|
||
|
||
employees as business
|
||
|
||
demand increases?
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
71%
|
||
|
||
No
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Challenges Rehiring or Hiring Employees
|
||
|
||
Are you having challenges
|
||
rehiring or hiring
|
||
employees as business
|
||
demand increases?
|
||
|
||
23
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
24
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Why or Why Not?
|
||
|
||
… are you having
|
||
|
||
challenges rehiring or
|
||
|
||
hiring employees as
|
||
|
||
business demand
|
||
|
||
increases?
|
||
|
||
• Initially people were afraid of the virus and exposure.
|
||
|
||
• Many people just don't want to work weekends.
|
||
|
||
• Fighting against unemployment insurance
|
||
|
||
• Unemployment insurance competition
|
||
|
||
• Dislike of restaurant work
|
||
|
||
• The county lacks skilled workers
|
||
|
||
• Federal and State aid
|
||
|
||
• Uptick of drug use
|
||
|
||
• Government benefits reducing available labor pool.
|
||
|
||
• Childcare issues
|
||
|
||
• No general labor
|
||
|
||
• Federal stimulus money
|
||
|
||
• Economic decision based on unemployment benefits.
|
||
|
||
• Can't pay to compete against Federal aid.
|
||
|
||
• Cyclical employment.
|
||
|
||
• People moving out to start their careers.
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
• No
|
||
|
||
• Was able to hire out of customer base.
|
||
|
||
• Have retained entire workforce
|
||
|
||
• No, small staff
|
||
|
||
Why Not?
|
||
|
||
yakehplaer feedback
|
||
|
||
hy or
|
||
|
||
... are you having
|
||
challenges rehiring or
|
||
hiring employees as
|
||
business demand
|
||
increases?
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
« Initially people were afraid of the virus and exposure.
|
||
» Many people just don't want to work weekends.
|
||
|
||
» Fighting against unemployment insurance
|
||
|
||
« Unemployment insurance competition
|
||
|
||
» Dislike of restaurant work
|
||
|
||
* The county lacks skilled workers
|
||
|
||
» Federal and State aid
|
||
|
||
« Uptick of drug use
|
||
|
||
» Government benefits reducing available labor pool.
|
||
|
||
* Childcare issues
|
||
|
||
» No general labor
|
||
|
||
» Federal stimulus money
|
||
|
||
» Economic decision based on unemployment benefits.
|
||
* Can't pay to compete against Federal aid.
|
||
|
||
* Cyclical employment.
|
||
|
||
« People moving out to start their careers.
|
||
|
||
24
|
||
|
||
Why Not?
|
||
|
||
° No
|
||
» Was able to hire out of customer base.
|
||
« Have retained entire workforce
|
||
|
||
° No, small staff
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
New Businesses
|
||
|
||
What types of new
|
||
|
||
businesses would do
|
||
|
||
well in the region now
|
||
|
||
and in the future?
|
||
|
||
• Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• Retail stores.
|
||
|
||
• Business with roots
|
||
|
||
• Need accommodation.
|
||
|
||
• Need a grocery store.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• Manufacturing using skills from coal; hands-on work.
|
||
|
||
• Manufacturing that complements current businesses
|
||
|
||
• Additional large companies added to the region as a major
|
||
|
||
employment draw. Love small businesses but sees more
|
||
|
||
opportunity with large companies.
|
||
|
||
• Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
• Manufacturing - physical work
|
||
|
||
• Light steel fabrication
|
||
|
||
• Mobile home manufacturing
|
||
|
||
• Boats building
|
||
|
||
• Windmills
|
||
|
||
• Industries where people work with their hands
|
||
|
||
• Aerospace with airport upgrade
|
||
|
||
• Pallet company
|
||
|
||
• Trucking (in-bound)
|
||
|
||
• Battery related businesses
|
||
|
||
• Energy storage
|
||
|
||
• Steel manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Industry
|
||
|
||
• Outfitter with shuttle, tour, and trip options.
|
||
|
||
• At headwaters of the Clinch need an outfitters store and
|
||
|
||
sporting goods store.
|
||
|
||
• Canoe and kayak services.
|
||
|
||
• Boat launches in the area.
|
||
|
||
• Bike shop and services like a bike wash.
|
||
|
||
• Additional water activities on the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Recreation
|
||
|
||
• More restaurants with a greater variety of food.
|
||
|
||
• Visitors ask for restaurant options with sit down dinning.
|
||
|
||
Currently going outside of the county.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurant. Currently no place for people to go late night.
|
||
|
||
Need a nicer, sit-down restaurant.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants, especially breakfast.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants - better
|
||
|
||
Restaurants
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
New Businesses
|
||
|
||
What types of new
|
||
businesses would do
|
||
well in the region now
|
||
and in the future?
|
||
|
||
Industry
|
||
|
||
« Manufacturing using skills from coal; hands-on work.
|
||
« Manufacturing that complements current businesses
|
||
|
||
« Additional large companies added to the region as a major
|
||
employment draw. Love small businesses but sees more
|
||
opportunity with large companies.
|
||
|
||
« Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
* Manufacturing - physical work
|
||
« Light steel fabrication
|
||
|
||
» Mobile home manufacturing
|
||
|
||
* Boats building
|
||
|
||
° Windmills
|
||
|
||
« Industries where people work with their hands
|
||
« Aerospace with airport upgrade
|
||
« Pallet company
|
||
|
||
* Trucking (in-bound)
|
||
|
||
° Battery related businesses
|
||
|
||
° Energy storage
|
||
|
||
Steel manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
° Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
Retail stores.
|
||
Business with roots
|
||
Need accommodation.
|
||
Need a grocery store.
|
||
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
Restaurants
|
||
|
||
« More restaurants with a greater variety of food.
|
||
|
||
Visitors ask for restaurant options with sit down dinning.
|
||
Currently going outside of the county.
|
||
|
||
Restaurant. Currently no place for people to go late night.
|
||
Need a nicer, sit-down restaurant.
|
||
|
||
Restaurants
|
||
|
||
Restaurants, especially breakfast.
|
||
|
||
Restaurants - better
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Recreation
|
||
|
||
° Outfitter with shuttle, tour, and trip options.
|
||
|
||
At headwaters of the Clinch need an outfitters store and
|
||
sporting goods store.
|
||
|
||
Canoe and kayak services.
|
||
|
||
Boat launches in the area.
|
||
|
||
Bike shop and services like a bike wash.
|
||
|
||
Additional water activities on the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
26
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Needed Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or
|
||
|
||
support services are
|
||
|
||
needed to strengthen the
|
||
|
||
region?
|
||
|
||
• Entrepreneurial services for business start up.
|
||
|
||
• Entrepreneurial support services for people who are interested.
|
||
|
||
• Start up capital to assist entrepreneurs.
|
||
|
||
• Grant writing assistance for small business.
|
||
|
||
• Small business incubator type concept.
|
||
|
||
• Entrepreneurial support.
|
||
|
||
Entrepreneurship Support
|
||
|
||
• Better support for business for emergency events in the future.
|
||
|
||
• Central information source through the government for business
|
||
|
||
continuation.
|
||
|
||
• Post pandemic support for how to avoid closures in the future.
|
||
|
||
• Better centralization of business support offerings going forward to
|
||
|
||
assist locals interested in starting and keeping a business in the
|
||
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
• Better building support.
|
||
|
||
• Construction support for new businesses and buildings.
|
||
|
||
• Money allocated towards storefront beautification.
|
||
|
||
• Money towards assistance with staying in business.
|
||
|
||
Business Support
|
||
|
||
• Additional collective marketing needs.
|
||
|
||
• Social media marketing support because when social media has
|
||
|
||
been used, people have arrived directly citing it for visiting.
|
||
|
||
• More online regional promotion of area itineraries
|
||
|
||
Marketing
|
||
|
||
• Better rail access (rail spur)
|
||
|
||
• Roads have improved but more work needed.
|
||
|
||
• Logistics hub in region.
|
||
|
||
• Better rail service.
|
||
|
||
• Better roads
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
• Better trade education and funding.
|
||
|
||
• Education focus - PreK to Community College
|
||
|
||
• Make UVA Wise more of a high-tech school.
|
||
|
||
• College trade school is improving but needs a lot of improvement,
|
||
|
||
needs more funding.
|
||
|
||
• Vocational education
|
||
|
||
• More certified welders and laser equipment operators.
|
||
|
||
• Better soft skills training.
|
||
|
||
Education & Training
|
||
|
||
• Continuation of fiber broadband deployment.
|
||
|
||
• Better cell coverage on 460.
|
||
|
||
• More daycare options.
|
||
|
||
• Better hospital services
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Needed Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or Business Support Education & Trainin
|
||
|
||
- Better support for business for emergency events in the future. - Better trade education and funding.
|
||
|
||
su pport services are * Central information source through the government for business + Education focus - PreK to Community College
|
||
continuation.
|
||
|
||
needed to strengthen the - Make UVA Wise more of a high-tech school.
|
||
|
||
°
|
||
|
||
Post pandemic support for how to avoid closures in the future.
|
||
|
||
oa . . . * College trade school is improving but needs a lot of improvement,
|
||
- Better centralization of business support offerings going forward to 9 P g p
|
||
|
||
i needs more funding.
|
||
region? assist locals interested in starting and keeping a business in the g
|
||
area. * Vocational education
|
||
° Better building support. * More certified welders and laser equipment operators.
|
||
* Construction support for new businesses and buildings. * Better soft skills training.
|
||
» Money allocated towards storefront beautification.
|
||
» Money towards assistance with staying in business. Infrastructu re
|
||
|
||
Entre reneurshi Su ort ° Better rail access (rail spur)
|
||
Entrepreneurship support
|
||
|
||
« Entrepreneurial services for business start up.
|
||
|
||
Roads have improved but more work needed.
|
||
|
||
Logistics hub in region.
|
||
« Entrepreneurial support services for people who are interested.
|
||
|
||
Better rail service.
|
||
|
||
Start up capital to assist entrepreneurs.
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
Better roads
|
||
|
||
Grant writing assistance for small business.
|
||
|
||
Small business incubator type concept. Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
Entrepreneurial support.
|
||
|
||
* Continuation of fiber broadband deployment.
|
||
|
||
Marketing + Better cell coverage on 460.
|
||
|
||
- Additional collective marketing needs. * More daycare options.
|
||
|
||
+ Social media marketing support because when social media has * Better hospital services
|
||
been used, people have arrived directly citing it for visiting.
|
||
|
||
* More online regional promotion of area itineraries
|
||
|
||
26
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
27
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Vision for the Region
|
||
|
||
What is your vision of
|
||
|
||
the region 10 years from
|
||
|
||
now?
|
||
|
||
• A manufacturing center of excellence.
|
||
|
||
• Business leaders (small businesses) leading the
|
||
|
||
change or advising leaders.
|
||
|
||
• Better community networking and support
|
||
|
||
between small business owners and county
|
||
|
||
officials.
|
||
|
||
• A collective business voice for region for all.
|
||
|
||
• Prosperity.
|
||
|
||
• Diversified economy.
|
||
|
||
• Strong manufacturing
|
||
|
||
• Stability in metalogical coal
|
||
|
||
• More manufacturing
|
||
|
||
• Diversified businesses - new and existing
|
||
|
||
• Better regional cooperation around economy
|
||
|
||
• Coal will never be replaced, but opportunities in
|
||
|
||
tech.
|
||
|
||
Strong Industrial Base
|
||
• A walkable, shoppable downtown area.
|
||
|
||
• Vibrant downtown.
|
||
|
||
• More main street development.
|
||
|
||
• Additional retail and restaurants on main street.
|
||
|
||
• Vibrant storefronts with shopping options and
|
||
|
||
able to walk downtown.
|
||
|
||
• Coffee shop, outdoor theater for music and arts.
|
||
|
||
• More walking trails and bike trails.
|
||
|
||
• Better dining.
|
||
|
||
• Maintain unique quality and friendliness with
|
||
|
||
expanded business opportunities.
|
||
|
||
• More for families to do (movies, theaters).
|
||
|
||
• More cultural activities.
|
||
|
||
• Better services for younger people.
|
||
|
||
• Nice parks and water feature for kids.
|
||
|
||
• Better housing options.
|
||
|
||
Increased Livability
|
||
• More modernization but maintaining community
|
||
|
||
historic beauty.
|
||
|
||
• Natural beauty preserved.
|
||
|
||
• Trashcans and dumping out on the side of the
|
||
|
||
road need to go.
|
||
|
||
• Clean up the community a bit.
|
||
|
||
Protecting Environment
|
||
|
||
• Community growth through additional jobs.
|
||
|
||
• More available jobs.
|
||
|
||
• More high paying jobs
|
||
|
||
• Improve job growth.
|
||
|
||
• Need more middle-income jobs
|
||
|
||
• Job opportunities at all levels needed to retain
|
||
|
||
kids.
|
||
|
||
• Returning people.
|
||
|
||
• More full-time permanent residents.
|
||
|
||
• Higher population
|
||
|
||
• Want to see a vibrant community to attract
|
||
|
||
people to the area
|
||
|
||
• Recruit more IT jobs.
|
||
|
||
More People and Jobs
|
||
|
||
• Steady progression, just doesn't want to see a
|
||
|
||
backslide.
|
||
|
||
• Change mindset, be more self sufficient.
|
||
|
||
• Quality medical care needs to stay.
|
||
|
||
• Graduates staying in the area and able to find
|
||
|
||
jobs.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• More tourism friendly. Pushing out into the
|
||
|
||
community with signage and communication
|
||
|
||
from major tourism draws which already exist.
|
||
|
||
• See outdoor activities become the center piece
|
||
|
||
of the community's tourism efforts.
|
||
|
||
• Opportunities for local people to become
|
||
|
||
entrepreneurs in outdoor industry.
|
||
|
||
• Additional emphasis on the tourism market.
|
||
|
||
• Bike shops.
|
||
|
||
• More accommodations.
|
||
|
||
• Tying ATV and 4-wheel trails into the Tazewell
|
||
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
• More services to capture people once they are
|
||
|
||
here.
|
||
|
||
• More inter-county cooperation in tourism
|
||
|
||
• More development with smaller lodging, privately
|
||
|
||
owned
|
||
|
||
• Trail expansion
|
||
|
||
• A destination for trails and camping.
|
||
|
||
• Additional rental housing inventory.
|
||
|
||
Strong Tourism Economy
|
||
|
||
Tee Rep e IK
|
||
|
||
What is your vision of
|
||
the region 10 years from
|
||
now?
|
||
|
||
Increased Livability Strong Industrial Base Protecting Environment
|
||
|
||
* Awalkable, shoppable downtown area.
|
||
|
||
* Vibrant downtown.
|
||
|
||
* More main street development.
|
||
|
||
* Additional retail and restaurants on main street.
|
||
|
||
- Vibrant storefronts with shopping options and
|
||
able to walk downtown.
|
||
|
||
* Coffee shop, outdoor theater for music and arts.
|
||
* More walking trails and bike trails.
|
||
* Better dining.
|
||
|
||
* Maintain unique quality and friendliness with
|
||
expanded business opportunities.
|
||
|
||
* More for families to do (movies, theaters).
|
||
* More cultural activities.
|
||
|
||
* Better services for younger people.
|
||
|
||
* Nice parks and water feature for kids.
|
||
|
||
* Better housing options.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
* Steady progression, just doesn't want to see a
|
||
backslide.
|
||
|
||
* Change mindset, be more self sufficient.
|
||
* Quality medical care needs to stay.
|
||
|
||
* Graduates staying in the area and able to find
|
||
jobs.
|
||
|
||
27
|
||
|
||
» Amanufacturing center of excellence.
|
||
|
||
* Business leaders (small businesses) leading the
|
||
change or advising leaders.
|
||
|
||
* Better community networking and support
|
||
between small business owners and county
|
||
officials.
|
||
|
||
* Acollective business voice for region for all.
|
||
* Prosperity.
|
||
|
||
° Diversified economy.
|
||
|
||
« Strong manufacturing
|
||
|
||
* Stability in metalogical coal
|
||
|
||
* More manufacturing
|
||
|
||
* Diversified businesses - new and existing
|
||
|
||
° Better regional cooperation around economy
|
||
|
||
* Coal will never be replaced, but opportunities in
|
||
tech.
|
||
|
||
More People and Jobs
|
||
|
||
* Community growth through additional jobs.
|
||
|
||
* More available jobs.
|
||
|
||
* More high paying jobs
|
||
|
||
* Improve job growth.
|
||
|
||
» Need more middle-income jobs
|
||
|
||
* Job opportunities at all levels needed to retain
|
||
kids.
|
||
|
||
« Returning people.
|
||
|
||
* More full-time permanent residents.
|
||
|
||
« Higher population
|
||
|
||
« Want to see a vibrant community to attract
|
||
people to the area
|
||
|
||
« Recruit more IT jobs.
|
||
|
||
» More modernization but maintaining community
|
||
historic beauty.
|
||
|
||
- Natural beauty preserved.
|
||
|
||
* Trashcans and dumping out on the side of the
|
||
road need to go.
|
||
|
||
* Clean up the community a bit.
|
||
|
||
Strong Tourism Economy
|
||
|
||
* More tourism friendly. Pushing out into the
|
||
community with signage and communication
|
||
from major tourism draws which already exist.
|
||
|
||
* See outdoor activities become the center piece
|
||
of the community's tourism efforts.
|
||
|
||
* Opportunities for local people to become
|
||
entrepreneurs in outdoor industry.
|
||
|
||
* Additional emphasis on the tourism market.
|
||
* Bike shops.
|
||
» More accommodations.
|
||
|
||
* Tying ATV and 4-wheel trails into the Tazewell
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
* More services to capture people once they are
|
||
here.
|
||
|
||
* More inter-county cooperation in tourism
|
||
|
||
* More development with smaller lodging, privately
|
||
owned
|
||
|
||
* Trail expansion
|
||
» Adestination for trails and camping.
|
||
* Additional rental housing inventory.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
28
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
More Questions
|
||
|
||
What did we not ask, that
|
||
|
||
we should have asked? • Leadership
|
||
|
||
• More diversity of investing between different businesses
|
||
|
||
and business owners.
|
||
|
||
• Not enough for tourists in the winter, indoor activity, things
|
||
|
||
for kids to do.
|
||
|
||
• Moonshine business gets additional notoriety due to
|
||
|
||
current TV trends.
|
||
|
||
• Lots of engagement on social media.
|
||
|
||
• Trying to get more local help with promoting area.
|
||
|
||
• When events come to the area, would like to see cross-
|
||
|
||
promotion of local business..
|
||
|
||
• Social media support.
|
||
|
||
• Home prices increasing. Shortage of housing
|
||
|
||
• Customers impacted in other more restrictive states hurting
|
||
|
||
our business.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of childcare.
|
||
|
||
• School closures preventing work
|
||
|
||
• Keep progressing.
|
||
|
||
• Support existing business
|
||
|
||
• More lodging is the biggest factor. Only a few rental
|
||
|
||
properties
|
||
|
||
• Would like to see more trail expansion. More people
|
||
|
||
interested in coming back for new trail miles, would
|
||
|
||
eventually lead to business decline with no additional trails
|
||
|
||
added.
|
||
|
||
• County promotion of Pocahontas Exhibition Mine.
|
||
|
||
• Would like to see it billed as ATV friendly.
|
||
|
||
• Wish more people could see the area as a tourist area.
|
||
|
||
• Lots of preconceived notions about coal towns, towns have
|
||
|
||
a lot to offer.
|
||
|
||
• There is a lot to offer, and people like it once they’re here.
|
||
|
||
What did we not ask, that we should have asked?
|
||
|
||
stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
More esTIONS
|
||
|
||
What did we not ask, that
|
||
we should have asked?
|
||
|
||
W
|
||
|
||
Leadership
|
||
|
||
More diversity of investing between different businesses
|
||
and business owners.
|
||
|
||
Not enough for tourists in the winter, indoor activity, things
|
||
for kids to do.
|
||
|
||
Moonshine business gets additional notoriety due to
|
||
current TV trends.
|
||
|
||
Lots of engagement on social media.
|
||
Trying to get more local help with promoting area.
|
||
|
||
When events come to the area, would like to see cross-
|
||
promotion of local business..
|
||
|
||
Social media support.
|
||
Home prices increasing. Shortage of housing
|
||
|
||
Customers impacted in other more restrictive states hurting
|
||
our business.
|
||
|
||
Lack of childcare.
|
||
School closures preventing work
|
||
|
||
Keep progressing.
|
||
|
||
28
|
||
|
||
hat did we not ask, that we should have asked?
|
||
|
||
* Support existing business
|
||
|
||
More lodging is the biggest factor. Only a few rental
|
||
properties
|
||
|
||
Would like to see more trail expansion. More people
|
||
interested in coming back for new trail miles, would
|
||
eventually lead to business decline with no additional trails
|
||
added.
|
||
|
||
County promotion of Pocahontas Exhibition Mine.
|
||
Would like to see it billed as ATV friendly.
|
||
Wish more people could see the area as a tourist area.
|
||
|
||
Lots of preconceived notions about coal towns, towns have
|
||
a lot to offer.
|
||
|
||
There is a lot to offer, and people like it once they’re here.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
29
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Additional Thoughts? – Part 1
|
||
|
||
• Regional and cross-county cooperation.
|
||
|
||
• More interaction between county officials and small business owners.
|
||
|
||
• Has noticed a decline in small business interaction and support within the
|
||
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
• More signage and banners between businesses.
|
||
|
||
• In Summer months we get a lot of people staying in Airbnb properties over Abington
|
||
|
||
due to low cost.
|
||
|
||
• People using the Lebanon area to push out to other areas.
|
||
|
||
• Younger people who need lower cost of travel. Most young people traveling are
|
||
|
||
asking about hiking.
|
||
|
||
• Need additional information on hiking difficulty and trail length. Need online
|
||
|
||
resources for this.
|
||
|
||
• People are happy to sit on owned properties instead of making those spaces
|
||
|
||
available for businesses to open and develop.
|
||
|
||
• Weather and water level has been a deterrent for this year. Mostly weekend
|
||
|
||
demand. Lots of local kayaking demand. 70/30 leans local.
|
||
|
||
• Rental properties are the biggest money makers over the stores. Rentals are
|
||
|
||
somewhat protected from minimum wage increases.
|
||
|
||
• Had to adjust to seasonal demands to create year-round products. Need to import
|
||
|
||
nearly all products due to supply line issues.
|
||
|
||
• Back of the Dragon has kept the area's tourism economy strong.
|
||
|
||
• Need more and better accommodations.
|
||
|
||
• Competition between communities with trailheads with advantage going to those
|
||
|
||
with better accommodations.
|
||
|
||
• Locals are using tourism assets in the area- can be seen as a QoL improvement.
|
||
|
||
• Need additional tourism, but also need local workforce to support increase in
|
||
|
||
demand.
|
||
|
||
• Hard to find workers staying home with Federal money.
|
||
|
||
• Need daycare facilities.
|
||
|
||
• Need schools open to allow workers to come to facility..
|
||
|
||
• Once stimulus gone, economy will improve; clear example of government and
|
||
|
||
economy disconnect.
|
||
|
||
• Shift from mining to related strengths.
|
||
|
||
• Supports tourism for culture.
|
||
|
||
• Use SVAM to train welders and leadership training.
|
||
|
||
• Use vocational center students.
|
||
|
||
• 20% of business comes from Canada. International closures were a huge issue.
|
||
|
||
• Trying to figure out how to package the BOTD experience into a wider vacation.
|
||
|
||
• Some shifts in demographics - pulling more from Charlotte region and new biking
|
||
|
||
visitors.
|
||
|
||
• People find spots on Airbnb and just take the opportunities to get away.
|
||
|
||
• Supply Chain issues, needed distribution hub for region.
|
||
|
||
• Stop recruiting coal related industries.
|
||
|
||
• Need more trade scholarships.
|
||
|
||
• VEDP Valet Program has helped expand customer base.
|
||
|
||
RENE sug Hee Ref
|
||
|
||
Regional and cross-county cooperation.
|
||
More interaction between county officials and small business owners.
|
||
|
||
Has noticed a decline in small business interaction and support within the
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
More signage and banners between businesses.
|
||
|
||
In Summer months we get a lot of people staying in Airbnb properties over Abington
|
||
due to low cost.
|
||
|
||
People using the Lebanon area to push out to other areas.
|
||
|
||
Younger people who need lower cost of travel. Most young people traveling are
|
||
asking about hiking.
|
||
|
||
Need additional information on hiking difficulty and trail length. Need online
|
||
resources for this.
|
||
|
||
People are happy to sit on owned properties instead of making those spaces
|
||
available for businesses to open and develop.
|
||
|
||
Weather and water level has been a deterrent for this year. Mostly weekend
|
||
demand. Lots of local kayaking demand. 70/30 leans local.
|
||
|
||
Rental properties are the biggest money makers over the stores. Rentals are
|
||
somewhat protected from minimum wage increases.
|
||
|
||
Had to adjust to seasonal demands to create year-round products. Need to import
|
||
nearly all products due to supply line issues.
|
||
|
||
Back of the Dragon has kept the area's tourism economy strong.
|
||
Need more and better accommodations.
|
||
|
||
Competition between communities with trailheads with advantage going to those
|
||
with better accommodations.
|
||
|
||
29
|
||
|
||
* Locals are using tourism assets in the area- can be seen as a QoL improvement.
|
||
|
||
« Need additional tourism, but also need local workforce to support increase in
|
||
demand.
|
||
|
||
¢ Hard to find workers staying home with Federal money.
|
||
« Need daycare facilities.
|
||
« Need schools open to allow workers to come to facility..
|
||
|
||
* Once stimulus gone, economy will improve; clear example of government and
|
||
economy disconnect.
|
||
|
||
° Shift from mining to related strengths.
|
||
|
||
¢ Supports tourism for culture.
|
||
|
||
» Use SVAM to train welders and leadership training.
|
||
|
||
» Use vocational center students.
|
||
|
||
* 20% of business comes from Canada. International closures were a huge issue.
|
||
* Trying to figure out how to package the BOTD experience into a wider vacation.
|
||
|
||
» Some shifts in demographics - pulling more from Charlotte region and new biking
|
||
visitors.
|
||
|
||
* People find spots on Airbnb and just take the opportunities to get away.
|
||
» Supply Chain issues, needed distribution hub for region.
|
||
|
||
* Stop recruiting coal related industries.
|
||
|
||
° Need more trade scholarships.
|
||
|
||
« VEDP Valet Program has helped expand customer base.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
30
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Additional Thoughts? – Part 2
|
||
|
||
• Residents see the area as declining; tourists see the area as developing.
|
||
|
||
• Community is transitioning away from extractive resources.
|
||
|
||
• Would like to see those responsible for decision making go to neighboring communities for partnerships and ideas.
|
||
|
||
• Currently using Facebook to promote regional attractions to ATV groups and history groups.
|
||
|
||
• People can find the area and the Pocahontas Exhibition Mine on social media. Have looked at paid social media advertising and rack cards.
|
||
|
||
• Had a few new businesses open but need additional development.
|
||
|
||
• UTV Takeover at Southern Gap has been good. More of those kinds of events.
|
||
|
||
• Have the ideas but finding the people in terms of manpower and finding talent and employees.
|
||
|
||
• People want more services but are not sure of the community support to actually keep it running in the community.
|
||
|
||
• Tourism could increase demand but could also be a source of community pride.
|
||
|
||
• Started business to draw people to the area and support the area.
|
||
|
||
RENE hougHEe RSS
|
||
|
||
« Residents see the area as declining; tourists see the area as developing.
|
||
|
||
* Community is transitioning away from extractive resources.
|
||
|
||
« Would like to see those responsible for decision making go to neighboring communities for partnerships and ideas.
|
||
|
||
¢ Currently using Facebook to promote regional attractions to ATV groups and history groups.
|
||
|
||
° People can find the area and the Pocahontas Exhibition Mine on social media. Have looked at paid social media advertising and rack cards.
|
||
« Had a few new businesses open but need additional development.
|
||
|
||
e UTV Takeover at Southern Gap has been good. More of those kinds of events.
|
||
|
||
° Have the ideas but finding the people in terms of manpower and finding talent and employees.
|
||
|
||
° People want more services but are not sure of the community support to actually keep it running in the community.
|
||
|
||
* Tourism could increase demand but could also be a source of community pride.
|
||
|
||
« Started business to draw people to the area and support the area.
|
||
|
||
30
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
31
|
||
|
||
Tourism Specific Responses
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Tourism Specific Responses
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
32
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Business Generated by Tourism
|
||
|
||
How dependent is your
|
||
|
||
business on visitor traffic
|
||
|
||
generated by area tourism?
|
||
|
||
(Excludes Tourism
|
||
|
||
Exclusive Establishments)
|
||
|
||
Totally Dependent
|
||
23%
|
||
|
||
Not Dependent
|
||
46%
|
||
|
||
Very Dependent
|
||
15%
|
||
|
||
Somewhat Dependent
|
||
15%
|
||
|
||
Sstakeho Ider Feedback
|
||
|
||
USINESS Gensratea by Tourism
|
||
|
||
How dependent is your
|
||
|
||
Very Dependent
|
||
|
||
business on visitor traffic Totally Dependent 15%
|
||
°
|
||
|
||
generated by area tourism? 23%
|
||
(Excludes Tourism
|
||
|
||
Exclusive Establishments)
|
||
Somewhat Dependent
|
||
|
||
15%
|
||
|
||
Not Dependent
|
||
46%
|
||
|
||
32
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
33
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Non-local Tourism
|
||
|
||
How much of your business
|
||
|
||
comes from tourists
|
||
|
||
outside the region as
|
||
|
||
opposed to local sources?
|
||
|
||
(Tourism Only)
|
||
|
||
10-25%
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
100%
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
25-50%
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
75-95%
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Sta keh \der Feedback
|
||
|
||
Non-local Tourism
|
||
|
||
How much of your business
|
||
comes from tourists
|
||
outside the region as
|
||
opposed to local sources?
|
||
(Tourism Only)
|
||
|
||
10-25%
|
||
25% 25-50%
|
||
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
100% 75-95%
|
||
25% 25%
|
||
|
||
33
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
34
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Needed Businesses & Services
|
||
|
||
What additional
|
||
|
||
businesses or services
|
||
|
||
are needed to strengthen
|
||
|
||
the tourism industry?
|
||
|
||
• Convenience store
|
||
|
||
• Gas station
|
||
|
||
• ATV wash.
|
||
|
||
• Gas.
|
||
|
||
• Lodging.
|
||
|
||
• Rental market for ATVs exists
|
||
|
||
Retail and Lodging
|
||
• Lack of outfitters. Newbies to outfitting haven't succeeded.
|
||
|
||
• Outfitters with guided tours.
|
||
|
||
• Guides for activities.
|
||
|
||
• Additional activity guide services.
|
||
|
||
• Additional guiding services.
|
||
|
||
More Guides and Outfitters
|
||
|
||
• More regional approach to activities with rotation between
|
||
|
||
recreation sources.
|
||
|
||
• Additional activities in the Breaks Interstate Park.
|
||
|
||
• Could use community guide for helping to start new
|
||
|
||
businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Need additional signage to find trailheads and parking
|
||
|
||
areas for hiking
|
||
|
||
• Business support related to spearhead trail.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
• Nice culinary scene.
|
||
|
||
• Have had a tough time finding concessionaires.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants
|
||
|
||
• Restaurant
|
||
|
||
Better Food Offerings
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Nee USINESSES eCrvices
|
||
What additional More Guides and Outfitters Retail and Lodging
|
||
« Lack of outfitters. Newbies to outfitting haven't succeeded. » Convenience store
|
||
|
||
businesses or services ¢ Outfitters with guided tours.
|
||
|
||
Gas station
|
||
|
||
are needed to strengthen — - Guides for activities. ATV wash.
|
||
|
||
the tourism industry? « Additional activity guide services. ° Gas.
|
||
» Additional guiding services. Lodging.
|
||
|
||
Rental market for ATVs exists
|
||
|
||
Better Food Offerings Miscellaneous
|
||
» Nice culinary scene. * More regional approach to activities with rotation between
|
||
|
||
» Have had a tough time finding concessionaires. recreation sources.
|
||
|
||
» Restaurants Additional activities in the Breaks Interstate Park.
|
||
|
||
Could use community guide for helping to start new
|
||
businesses.
|
||
|
||
« Restaurant
|
||
|
||
Need additional signage to find trailheads and parking
|
||
areas for hiking
|
||
|
||
Business support related to spearhead trail.
|
||
|
||
34
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
35
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Complaints from Tourists
|
||
|
||
What complaints or
|
||
|
||
frustrations do you hear
|
||
|
||
from tourists about the
|
||
|
||
area?
|
||
|
||
• Tech complaints- difference in cell
|
||
|
||
coverage between carriers.
|
||
|
||
• Somewhat of an escape destination,
|
||
|
||
but not a particularly off-grid
|
||
|
||
destination.
|
||
|
||
Connectivity
|
||
|
||
• Remoteness, difficulty of travel to the
|
||
|
||
area. People expect short drive to
|
||
|
||
everything.
|
||
|
||
• Lots to do in area but need willingness
|
||
|
||
to drive.
|
||
|
||
• Some people aren't willing to make the
|
||
|
||
drive to get to these places.
|
||
|
||
• Roads, and the difficulty of getting to
|
||
|
||
the site.
|
||
|
||
Accessibility
|
||
• No sit-down mom and pop restaurants.
|
||
|
||
Looking for all local experiences.
|
||
|
||
• Need more restaurants.
|
||
|
||
• Need sit down style restaurants and a
|
||
|
||
place to get a drink.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants are lacking in variety
|
||
|
||
Restaurants Choices
|
||
|
||
• Lack of lodging.
|
||
|
||
• Desire for trail-accessible rustic lodging.
|
||
|
||
Heavy cabin bookings, but desire for
|
||
|
||
larger group facilities.
|
||
|
||
• Not much lodging.
|
||
|
||
Lodging Choices
|
||
|
||
• Desire for water feature- pond, lake,
|
||
|
||
pool- any non-motorized recreational
|
||
|
||
opportunities.
|
||
|
||
• No place to get gas in town.
|
||
|
||
• Most satisfied guests are the ones
|
||
|
||
seeking a remote outdoor experience.
|
||
|
||
• Campfire access, out of the way,
|
||
|
||
reclusive for trail traffic.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
tak holder Feedback
|
||
|
||
omplaints trom Tours
|
||
|
||
What complaints or
|
||
frustrations do you hear
|
||
from tourists about the
|
||
area?
|
||
|
||
Accessibility
|
||
|
||
« Remoteness, difficulty of travel to the
|
||
area. People expect short drive to
|
||
everything.
|
||
|
||
° Lots to do in area but need willingness
|
||
to drive.
|
||
|
||
« Some people aren't willing to make the
|
||
drive to get to these places.
|
||
|
||
» Roads, and the difficulty of getting to
|
||
the site.
|
||
|
||
Connectivity Lodging Choices
|
||
|
||
* Tech complaints- difference in cell
|
||
coverage between carriers.
|
||
|
||
» Somewhat of an escape destination,
|
||
but not a particularly off-grid
|
||
destination.
|
||
|
||
35
|
||
|
||
Restaurants Choices
|
||
|
||
* No sit-down mom and pop restaurants.
|
||
Looking for all local experiences.
|
||
|
||
« Need more restaurants.
|
||
|
||
» Need sit down style restaurants and a
|
||
place to get a drink.
|
||
|
||
¢ Restaurants are lacking in variety
|
||
|
||
« Lack of lodging.
|
||
|
||
° Desire for trail-accessible rustic lodging.
|
||
Heavy cabin bookings, but desire for
|
||
larger group facilities.
|
||
|
||
» Not much lodging.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
° Desire for water feature- pond, lake,
|
||
pool- any non-motorized recreational
|
||
opportunities.
|
||
|
||
* No place to get gas in town.
|
||
|
||
« Most satisfied guests are the ones
|
||
seeking a remote outdoor experience.
|
||
|
||
° Campfire access, out of the way,
|
||
reclusive for trail traffic.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
36
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Shift in Tourist Demographics
|
||
|
||
Have you seen a shift in
|
||
|
||
tourist demographics
|
||
|
||
during the pandemic?
|
||
|
||
(Examples include age,
|
||
|
||
income, location of
|
||
|
||
origin, interests upon
|
||
|
||
arrival, etc.)
|
||
|
||
• Usually pulling from neighboring states.
|
||
|
||
• 50% of business comes from VA and KY
|
||
|
||
• Pandemic changes not particularly high. Still seeing similar demographics.
|
||
|
||
• Big boom in camping. Shifted slightly more local during pandemic.
|
||
|
||
• Ongoing shift away from older, less experienced community toward more outdoorsy and younger demographic.
|
||
|
||
• Emphasis on natural assets as opposed to the facilities.
|
||
|
||
• Anecdotal increase in rock climbing.
|
||
|
||
• Classic destinations are getting crowded, so people are spreading out. Getting away from urban areas and crowding.
|
||
|
||
• Mostly returning guests from NC and Ohio. Have seen a pandemic uptick from Pike County and Lecher County KY.
|
||
|
||
• Shift towards farther flung markets. Heavy influx from NY. Major draw was the ATV trails.
|
||
|
||
• Most travelers outside of the immediate area are coming from outside of the state entirely. Lots of NC, SC, PA, OH
|
||
|
||
• Not much shift
|
||
|
||
Observations
|
||
|
||
Sigkeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Have you seen a shift in Observations
|
||
|
||
tourist demographics » Usually pulling from neighboring states.
|
||
|
||
. P * 50% of business comes from VA and KY
|
||
during the pandemic?
|
||
|
||
« Pandemic changes not particularly high. Still seeing similar demographics.
|
||
(Examples include age, * Big boom in camping. Shifted slightly more local during pandemic.
|
||
income, location of * Ongoing shift away from older, less experienced community toward more outdoorsy and younger demographic.
|
||
origin, interests upon « Emphasis on natural assets as opposed to the facilities.
|
||
|
||
. ° Anecdotal increase in rock climbing.
|
||
arrival, etc.) * Classic destinations are getting crowded, so people are spreading out. Getting away from urban areas and crowding.
|
||
* Mostly returning guests from NC and Ohio. Have seen a pandemic uptick from Pike County and Lecher County KY.
|
||
|
||
° Shift towards farther flung markets. Heavy influx from NY. Major draw was the ATV trails.
|
||
|
||
¢ Most travelers outside of the immediate area are coming from outside of the state entirely. Lots of NC, SC, PA, OH
|
||
|
||
« Not much shift
|
||
|
||
36
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
37
|
||
|
||
Government and Nonprofit Sector
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
fe)
|
||
Bs
|
||
)
|
||
ap:
|
||
=
|
||
3
|
||
0)
|
||
aD |
|
||
or
|
||
fe)
|
||
=
|
||
rom
|
||
Zz
|
||
fe)
|
||
=)
|
||
ce)
|
||
S
|
||
fe)
|
||
=
|
||
Coma
|
||
Wn
|
||
0)
|
||
(@)
|
||
Com
|
||
fe)
|
||
“ss
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
38
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Sector Breakdown
|
||
|
||
Nonprofit
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Education
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Government
|
||
50%
|
||
|
||
Tourism Board
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Sector Breakdown
|
||
|
||
Nonprofit
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Education Government
|
||
6% 50%
|
||
Tourism Board
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
39
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Location
|
||
|
||
Entire Area
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Russel
|
||
County
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
County
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
County
|
||
19%
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
County
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Location
|
||
|
||
Russel
|
||
County
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Entire Area
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
County
|
||
19%
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
County
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
County
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
40
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Pandemic Response Efforts
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
• I think it was handled well.
|
||
|
||
• Nothing.
|
||
|
||
• I think business response was about right. It was as
|
||
|
||
effective as could be expected.
|
||
|
||
Nothing
|
||
|
||
• Lack of clarification and diverse interpretation of information
|
||
|
||
available, clearer direction was needed.
|
||
|
||
• Lots of confusion around qualifications.
|
||
|
||
• Needed clear process.
|
||
|
||
• Could have been a central information source since each
|
||
|
||
county also had its own grants so confusion around criteria.
|
||
|
||
• Early confusion over what would be helpful, try to create a
|
||
|
||
universal application to be able to update each year, have
|
||
|
||
those numbers available, would allow them to know when
|
||
|
||
anything happens what they might be able to do and how
|
||
|
||
they could apply.
|
||
|
||
• Orders came quickly which caused business panic,
|
||
|
||
business adjustments and learning, right way kept changing,
|
||
|
||
trying to stay up to date, and find unified approach.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of steady information, info changed constantly with lots
|
||
|
||
of uncertainty of federal and state info.
|
||
|
||
• More straightforward application.
|
||
|
||
Clarity
|
||
|
||
• More community outreach for info in rural areas.
|
||
|
||
• No town representatives to give info for what they can be
|
||
|
||
doing to help the public.
|
||
|
||
• Federal grants need to be prepared in advance.
|
||
|
||
• Banks were having a hard time knowing how to loan and
|
||
|
||
distribute funds; PPP loans were hardest
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• Had over reaction and then under reaction.
|
||
|
||
• The "shut down" imposed by the State should have been
|
||
|
||
imposed on a regional basis. Our economy was
|
||
|
||
prematurely "shut down" when the virus was not present or
|
||
|
||
at least not prevalent here.
|
||
|
||
• Then when the virus came in the fall residents were fatigued
|
||
|
||
with the limitations. This led to less public cooperation at
|
||
|
||
the critical juncture in October and November.
|
||
|
||
• Ironically, the "shut down" made the problem worse here
|
||
|
||
and prolonged it.
|
||
|
||
• Response delayed due to cases in area delayed.
|
||
|
||
Reaction
|
||
|
||
;
|
||
|
||
takeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
andemic Response
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
Clarity
|
||
|
||
« Lack of clarification and diverse interpretation of information
|
||
available, clearer direction was needed.
|
||
|
||
« Lots of confusion around qualifications.
|
||
|
||
» Needed clear process.
|
||
|
||
Could have been a central information source since each
|
||
county also had its own grants so confusion around criteria.
|
||
|
||
« Early confusion over what would be helpful, try to create a
|
||
universal application to be able to update each year, have
|
||
those numbers available, would allow them to know when
|
||
anything happens what they might be able to do and how
|
||
they could apply.
|
||
|
||
° Orders came quickly which caused business panic,
|
||
business adjustments and learning, right way kept changing,
|
||
trying to stay up to date, and find unified approach.
|
||
|
||
« Lack of steady information, info changed constantly with lots
|
||
of uncertainty of federal and state info.
|
||
|
||
« More straightforward application.
|
||
|
||
Nothing
|
||
|
||
« | think it was handled well.
|
||
° Nothing.
|
||
|
||
« | think business response was about right. It was as
|
||
effective as could be expected.
|
||
|
||
40
|
||
|
||
Reaction
|
||
|
||
° Had over reaction and then under reaction.
|
||
|
||
° The "shut down" imposed by the State should have been
|
||
imposed on a regional basis. Our economy was
|
||
prematurely "shut down" when the virus was not present or
|
||
at least not prevalent here.
|
||
|
||
° Then when the virus came in the fall residents were fatigued
|
||
with the limitations. This led to less public cooperation at
|
||
the critical juncture in October and November.
|
||
|
||
* Ironically, the "shut down" made the problem worse here
|
||
and prolonged it.
|
||
|
||
« Response delayed due to cases in area delayed.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
« More community outreach for info in rural areas.
|
||
|
||
» No town representatives to give info for what they can be
|
||
doing to help the public.
|
||
|
||
° Federal grants need to be prepared in advance.
|
||
|
||
« Banks were having a hard time knowing how to loan and
|
||
distribute funds; PPP loans were hardest
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
41
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Pandemic Response Efforts
|
||
|
||
And what was done
|
||
|
||
well?
|
||
• Funding grants
|
||
|
||
• We were awash in funding to help businesses.
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
• Rally calls gathered info and group camaraderie,
|
||
|
||
communication between organizations increased.
|
||
|
||
• Calls together plus individual outreach.
|
||
|
||
• Keeping people updated.
|
||
|
||
• VTC did industry meetings, monthly calls were helpful.
|
||
|
||
• Partnered with UVA WISE, gather regularly to provide a
|
||
|
||
resource for those at high level in the industry within gov
|
||
|
||
and non-profit orgs.
|
||
|
||
• Marketing efforts, pushing people towards time saving tech.
|
||
|
||
• Rally calls were useful for keeping people calm.
|
||
|
||
• Communication and togetherness. We were supported from
|
||
|
||
multiple sources.
|
||
|
||
Communication
|
||
|
||
• Scarecrow campaign.
|
||
|
||
• Followed recommendations from State.
|
||
|
||
• To some extent , quick reaction from business owners.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• Comprehensive response.
|
||
|
||
• No complaints
|
||
|
||
• Good job overall
|
||
|
||
• In general, went well.
|
||
|
||
• I think it was handled well.
|
||
|
||
Overall Effort
|
||
|
||
;
|
||
|
||
takeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
andemic Response
|
||
|
||
And what was done
|
||
well?
|
||
|
||
Communication
|
||
|
||
Rally calls gathered info and group camaraderie,
|
||
communication between organizations increased.
|
||
|
||
Calls together plus individual outreach.
|
||
Keeping people updated.
|
||
VTC did industry meetings, monthly calls were helpful.
|
||
|
||
Partnered with UVA WISE, gather regularly to provide a
|
||
resource for those at high level in the industry within gov
|
||
and non-profit orgs.
|
||
|
||
Marketing efforts, pushing people towards time saving tech.
|
||
Rally calls were useful for keeping people calm.
|
||
|
||
Communication and togetherness. We were supported from
|
||
multiple sources.
|
||
|
||
4l
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
|
||
* Funding grants
|
||
|
||
« We were awash in funding to help businesses.
|
||
|
||
Overall Effort
|
||
|
||
* Comprehensive response.
|
||
|
||
No complaints
|
||
|
||
Good job overall
|
||
|
||
In general, went well.
|
||
|
||
| think it was handled well.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
» Scarecrow campaign.
|
||
« Followed recommendations from State.
|
||
|
||
* To some extent , quick reaction from business owners.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
42
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Sources of Information
|
||
|
||
What sources did you
|
||
|
||
use to gain information
|
||
|
||
about pandemic
|
||
|
||
response, guidelines,
|
||
|
||
and recovery resources?
|
||
|
||
• County
|
||
|
||
• County Administration
|
||
|
||
• County emergency management
|
||
|
||
• County administrator
|
||
|
||
• Local gov’t website
|
||
|
||
• Health Departments
|
||
|
||
• Health department
|
||
|
||
• Local Health Department
|
||
|
||
Local Government
|
||
• VEDP
|
||
|
||
• Virginia health webpage
|
||
|
||
• SBDC
|
||
|
||
• State Gov
|
||
|
||
• State Government
|
||
|
||
• State government
|
||
|
||
• State
|
||
|
||
• Department of Treasury
|
||
|
||
• VDH
|
||
|
||
• Virginia Department of Health
|
||
|
||
• Governor’s calls were not useful for
|
||
|
||
tourism and funding.
|
||
|
||
• Governor calls were useful for
|
||
|
||
guidelines
|
||
|
||
• Gov. Northam's office
|
||
|
||
• State website
|
||
|
||
• VDH
|
||
|
||
• CICV (Council of Independent Colleges
|
||
|
||
in Virginia)
|
||
|
||
State Government
|
||
|
||
• Downtown happy hours.
|
||
|
||
• RALLY calls
|
||
|
||
• Internal communications
|
||
|
||
• Pharmacy school
|
||
|
||
• Large restaurant chain
|
||
|
||
• Private organizations
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
• Federal website
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• Federal Government
|
||
|
||
• Federal Government
|
||
|
||
Federal Government
|
||
|
||
• Social media
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
• Social media
|
||
|
||
• Industry tourism group on Facebook
|
||
|
||
Social Media
|
||
|
||
takeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
ources of Information
|
||
|
||
What sources did you
|
||
use to gain information
|
||
about pandemic
|
||
response, guidelines,
|
||
and recovery resources?
|
||
|
||
State Government
|
||
» VEDP
|
||
|
||
° Virginia health webpage
|
||
* SBDC
|
||
|
||
* State Gov
|
||
|
||
* State Government
|
||
|
||
* State government
|
||
|
||
* State
|
||
|
||
« Department of Treasury
|
||
» VDH
|
||
|
||
* Virginia Department of Health
|
||
|
||
* Governor's calls were not useful for
|
||
tourism and funding.
|
||
|
||
« Governor calls were useful for
|
||
guidelines
|
||
|
||
* Gov. Northam's office
|
||
* State website
|
||
° VDH
|
||
|
||
* CICV (Council of Independent Colleges
|
||
|
||
in Virginia)
|
||
|
||
42
|
||
|
||
Local Government
|
||
* County
|
||
* County Administration
|
||
|
||
* County emergency management
|
||
|
||
County administrator
|
||
|
||
Local gov't website
|
||
|
||
Health Departments
|
||
|
||
Health department
|
||
|
||
Local Health Department
|
||
|
||
Federal Government
|
||
° Federal website
|
||
|
||
* CDC
|
||
|
||
* CDC
|
||
|
||
* CDC
|
||
|
||
+ CDC
|
||
|
||
Federal Government
|
||
|
||
Federal Government
|
||
|
||
Social Media
|
||
|
||
* Social media
|
||
° Facebook
|
||
° Social media
|
||
|
||
° Industry tourism group on Facebook
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
« Downtown happy hours.
|
||
|
||
RALLY calls
|
||
|
||
Internal communications
|
||
|
||
Pharmacy school
|
||
|
||
Large restaurant chain
|
||
|
||
Private organizations
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
43
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Source Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
No 7%
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
72%
|
||
|
||
Sometimes
|
||
21%
|
||
|
||
And did you feel
|
||
|
||
adequately informed by
|
||
|
||
those sources?
|
||
|
||
stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
ource Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
And did you feel
|
||
adequately informed by
|
||
those sources?
|
||
|
||
No 7%
|
||
|
||
Sometimes
|
||
21%
|
||
|
||
43
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
44
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Source Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
88%
|
||
|
||
To Some Degree
|
||
12%
|
||
|
||
Did you feel you played a
|
||
|
||
leadership role in
|
||
|
||
pandemic response in
|
||
|
||
your sector?
|
||
|
||
stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
ource Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
Did you feel you played a
|
||
leadership role in
|
||
pandemic response in
|
||
your sector?
|
||
|
||
To Some Degree
|
||
|
||
12%
|
||
|
||
44
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
45
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Role Capability
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
68%
|
||
|
||
Sometimes
|
||
19%
|
||
|
||
And did you feel capable
|
||
|
||
in that role?
|
||
|
||
No
|
||
13%
|
||
|
||
takeholas r Feedback
|
||
|
||
And did you feel capable
|
||
in that role?
|
||
|
||
Sometimes
|
||
19%
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
46
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Remote Recruitment
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
100%
|
||
|
||
If the region embarked
|
||
|
||
on an aggressive
|
||
|
||
remote-worker
|
||
|
||
recruitment campaign to
|
||
|
||
import a tech-savvy
|
||
|
||
workforce, would it
|
||
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
Stak holder Feedback
|
||
|
||
emote Recruitment
|
||
|
||
If the region embarked
|
||
on an aggressive
|
||
remote-worker
|
||
recruitment campaign to
|
||
import a tech-savvy
|
||
workforce, would it
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
46
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
47
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Why or Why Not?
|
||
|
||
… If the region embarked
|
||
|
||
on an aggressive
|
||
|
||
remote-worker
|
||
|
||
recruitment campaign to
|
||
|
||
import a tech-savvy
|
||
|
||
workforce, would it
|
||
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
• Due to internet, now easier.
|
||
|
||
• Easier after pandemic.
|
||
|
||
• Easier here now but also everywhere else too.
|
||
|
||
• Do you recruit jobs first or workers first.
|
||
|
||
• Already have top robotics team in area.
|
||
|
||
• Yes, but jobs as well as workers.
|
||
|
||
• Remote workers will not necessarily solve population loss and lack of
|
||
|
||
workforce; however, there spouses and children will in the long term.
|
||
|
||
• Such workers likely will have more discretionary income to support
|
||
|
||
the amenities necessary to attract and retain businesses.
|
||
|
||
• It's needed.
|
||
|
||
• I think the region would be very attractive to such a workforce.
|
||
|
||
• Tide began to shift before pandemic, 25% of real estate was from out
|
||
|
||
of state.
|
||
|
||
• Seen a shift in work to remote work, pushing office staff towards
|
||
|
||
working at home.
|
||
|
||
• Communities in the area could use remote workers if internet
|
||
|
||
infrastructure goes forward.
|
||
|
||
• Frustrating because there is broadband, but people are still using
|
||
|
||
cable instead.
|
||
|
||
• Remote healthcare might help bring fresh ideas to the table
|
||
|
||
• Businesses doing a better job at providing for visitors.
|
||
|
||
• People are looking to small towns for outdoor rec and good outdoor
|
||
|
||
access.
|
||
|
||
• Realized how vital broadband is, more people means more
|
||
|
||
entrepreneurial opportunities and greater demand for outdoor rec.
|
||
|
||
• People who have a positive tourism experience are more likely to
|
||
|
||
relocate, outsiders view assets differently than locals.
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
• Technology in this area is currently hit or miss; had the
|
||
|
||
struggle of not being able to continue working due to limited
|
||
|
||
service.
|
||
|
||
• There is not much space for brick and mortar, so how do
|
||
|
||
you increase residents without additional buildings.
|
||
|
||
• Some homes so remote that a fiber connection is hard to
|
||
|
||
establish.
|
||
|
||
Why Not?
|
||
|
||
sia kehplder feed back
|
||
|
||
hy or
|
||
|
||
... If the region embarked
|
||
on an aggressive
|
||
remote-worker
|
||
recruitment campaign to
|
||
import a tech-savvy
|
||
workforce, would it
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
* Due to internet, now easier.
|
||
|
||
* Easier after pandemic.
|
||
|
||
« Easier here now but also everywhere else too.
|
||
* Do you recruit jobs first or workers first.
|
||
|
||
* Already have top robotics team in area.
|
||
|
||
* Yes, but jobs as well as workers.
|
||
|
||
+ Remote workers will not necessarily solve population loss and lack of
|
||
workforce; however, there spouses and children will in the long term.
|
||
|
||
* Such workers likely will have more discretionary income to support
|
||
the amenities necessary to attract and retain businesses.
|
||
|
||
° It's needed.
|
||
* | think the region would be very attractive to such a workforce.
|
||
|
||
* Tide began to shift before pandemic, 25% of real estate was from out
|
||
of state.
|
||
|
||
* Seen a shift in work to remote work, pushing office staff towards
|
||
working at home.
|
||
|
||
* Communities in the area could use remote workers if internet
|
||
infrastructure goes forward.
|
||
|
||
* Frustrating because there is broadband, but people are still using
|
||
cable instead.
|
||
|
||
* Remote healthcare might help bring fresh ideas to the table
|
||
* Businesses doing a better job at providing for visitors.
|
||
|
||
* People are looking to small towns for outdoor rec and good outdoor
|
||
access.
|
||
|
||
* Realized how vital broadband is, more people means more
|
||
entrepreneurial opportunities and greater demand for outdoor rec.
|
||
|
||
* People who have a positive tourism experience are more likely to
|
||
relocate, outsiders view assets differently than locals.
|
||
|
||
47
|
||
|
||
Why Not?
|
||
|
||
* Technology in this area is currently hit or miss; had the
|
||
struggle of not being able to continue working due to limited
|
||
service.
|
||
|
||
« There is not much space for brick and mortar, so how do
|
||
you increase residents without additional buildings.
|
||
|
||
» Some homes so remote that a fiber connection is hard to
|
||
establish.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
48
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Workers Leaving the Region
|
||
|
||
Why do you think
|
||
|
||
workers are leaving the
|
||
|
||
region (wages, housing
|
||
|
||
availability, public
|
||
|
||
access to recreational
|
||
|
||
trails/parks, not enough
|
||
|
||
nightlife)?
|
||
|
||
• Healthcare
|
||
|
||
• Access to health care specialist.
|
||
|
||
• People do not want to come back and
|
||
|
||
retire due to healthcare.
|
||
|
||
• Fear of opioid epidemic.
|
||
|
||
Healthcare
|
||
• Lack of things to do
|
||
|
||
• Need more to do
|
||
|
||
• More to do.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants
|
||
|
||
• Entertainment and Nightlife
|
||
|
||
• Better quality of life
|
||
|
||
• No bars or nightlife
|
||
|
||
• Not enough restaurants
|
||
|
||
• Quality of life remains low
|
||
|
||
• Nightlife and entertainment
|
||
|
||
• Family activities and workout groups.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of things for kids to do.
|
||
|
||
Entertainment
|
||
|
||
• Younger people like to have the
|
||
|
||
technology.
|
||
|
||
• No one likes to drive across the
|
||
|
||
mountain for access to activities.
|
||
|
||
• Cell coverage.
|
||
|
||
• Moving your parents to you instead of
|
||
|
||
moving to be near them.
|
||
|
||
• Housing availability.
|
||
|
||
• There is a desperate lack of middle-
|
||
|
||
class housing in our area.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
• Left for mining jobs outside region.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of job opportunities
|
||
|
||
• Lack of jobs
|
||
|
||
• Not enough opportunities for college
|
||
|
||
degree workers.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of jobs
|
||
|
||
• Lack of work, no industry
|
||
|
||
• Jobs mostly.
|
||
|
||
• More opportunity.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of jobs for higher educated
|
||
|
||
workers.
|
||
|
||
Job Opportunities
|
||
|
||
• Workers are leaving due to low wages.
|
||
|
||
• Wages
|
||
|
||
• Availability of high paying jobs
|
||
|
||
• Wages
|
||
|
||
Wages
|
||
|
||
• Without nationally known retail establishments
|
||
|
||
that cater to middle class shoppers, we
|
||
|
||
cannot retain the middle class.
|
||
|
||
• Younger generations buy online. They do not
|
||
|
||
necessarily "go shopping." So, the lack of
|
||
|
||
retail shopping will decline as an impediment.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of retail distribution center in the region,
|
||
|
||
as younger persons will expect same day or
|
||
|
||
next day delivery.
|
||
|
||
Shopping
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
orkers Leaving Region
|
||
|
||
Why do you think Entertainment Healthcare Wages
|
||
|
||
* Lack of things to do ° Healthcare « Workers are leaving due to low wages.
|
||
workers are leaving the » Need more to do » Access to health care specialist. » Wages
|
||
region (wages, housing * More to do. * People do not want to come back and —* Availability of high paying jobs
|
||
« Restaurants retire due to healthcare. Wa
|
||
. ays . . ges
|
||
availability, public « Entertainment and Nightlife + Fear of opioid epidemic.
|
||
access to recreational * Better quality of life
|
||
|
||
* No bars or nightlife
|
||
|
||
trails/parks, not enough N
|
||
« Not enough restaurants _— .
|
||
nightlife)? ~ Quality of life remains low Job Opportunities Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
» Nightlife and entertainment « Left for mining jobs outside region. » Younger people like to have the
|
||
|
||
Lack of job opportunities technology.
|
||
|
||
No one likes to drive across the
|
||
mountain for access to activities.
|
||
|
||
* Family activities and workout groups.
|
||
|
||
« Lack of things for kids to do.
|
||
|
||
Shoppin
|
||
|
||
« Without nationally known retail establishments
|
||
that cater to middle class shoppers, we
|
||
cannot retain the middle class.
|
||
|
||
Lack of jobs
|
||
|
||
Not enough opportunities for college
|
||
degree workers.
|
||
|
||
Cell coverage.
|
||
|
||
Moving your parents to you instead of
|
||
moving to be near them.
|
||
|
||
° Lack of jobs
|
||
|
||
Lack of work, no industry
|
||
|
||
* Younger generations buy online. They do not Jobs mostly. Housing availability.
|
||
|
||
necessarily "go shopping." So, the lack of ; » There is a desperate lack of middle-
|
||
retail shopping will decline as an impediment. More opportunity. class housing in our area.
|
||
|
||
* Lack of retail distribution center in the region, Lack of jobs for higher educated
|
||
as younger persons will expect same day or workers.
|
||
|
||
next day delivery.
|
||
|
||
48
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
49
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Types of New Businesses
|
||
|
||
What types of new
|
||
|
||
businesses would do
|
||
|
||
well in the region now
|
||
|
||
and in the future?
|
||
|
||
• Tech
|
||
|
||
• IT
|
||
|
||
• Data centers
|
||
|
||
• Data centers
|
||
|
||
Information Technology
|
||
• Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
• Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
• Materials mfg.
|
||
|
||
• Parts mfg.
|
||
|
||
• Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
• Medical devise mfg.
|
||
|
||
• Metal manufacturing and machining is the future here.
|
||
|
||
• Manufacturing jobs with middle of the road skills.
|
||
|
||
• Bigger industry relocation with stable, good pay jobs.
|
||
|
||
• Distribution in parts of region.
|
||
|
||
Industry
|
||
|
||
• Food
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants for tourist needs.
|
||
|
||
• More restaurants
|
||
|
||
Federal Government
|
||
|
||
• Airbnb's are doing well, even the more remote ones.
|
||
|
||
• Smaller lodging options
|
||
|
||
• People expanding their own businesses to accommodate
|
||
|
||
additional tourist needs.
|
||
|
||
• Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
• Lodging is a missing component which is not allowing
|
||
|
||
tourism expansion.
|
||
|
||
• Motorcyclists do not want to stay at an Airbnb, demand for
|
||
|
||
more traditional hotel accommodations.
|
||
|
||
Accommodations
|
||
|
||
• More specialty small shops with local involvement -
|
||
|
||
outfitters, general retailers, snacks and camping supplies,
|
||
|
||
general store.
|
||
|
||
• Outdoor industry businesses who put a high value on quality
|
||
|
||
of life.
|
||
|
||
• A boxing club.
|
||
|
||
• Movie theater, putt-putt, and music.
|
||
|
||
• Though I do foresee some undercurrent of robotic
|
||
|
||
metallurgical mining
|
||
|
||
• Remote working.
|
||
|
||
• Sports Complex
|
||
|
||
• Energy
|
||
|
||
• Medical services
|
||
|
||
• Healthcare
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
ypes of New Businesses
|
||
|
||
What types of new
|
||
businesses would do
|
||
well in the region now
|
||
and in the future?
|
||
|
||
Industry
|
||
|
||
« Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
° Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
» Materials mfg.
|
||
|
||
° Parts mfg.
|
||
|
||
° Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
» Medical devise mfg.
|
||
|
||
« Metal manufacturing and machining is the future here.
|
||
¢ Manufacturing jobs with middle of the road skills.
|
||
|
||
° Bigger industry relocation with stable, good pay jobs.
|
||
|
||
° Distribution in parts of region.
|
||
|
||
Accommodations
|
||
|
||
» Airbnb's are doing well, even the more remote ones.
|
||
|
||
* Smaller lodging options
|
||
|
||
People expanding their own businesses to accommodate
|
||
additional tourist needs.
|
||
|
||
Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
Lodging is a missing component which is not allowing
|
||
tourism expansion.
|
||
|
||
Motorcyclists do not want to stay at an Airbnb, demand for
|
||
more traditional hotel accommodations.
|
||
|
||
49
|
||
|
||
Information Technology
|
||
|
||
Tech
|
||
|
||
IT
|
||
|
||
Data centers
|
||
Data centers
|
||
|
||
Federal Government
|
||
|
||
Food
|
||
Restaurants for tourist needs.
|
||
More restaurants
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
More specialty small shops with local involvement -
|
||
outfitters, general retailers, snacks and camping supplies,
|
||
general store.
|
||
|
||
Outdoor industry businesses who put a high value on quality
|
||
of life.
|
||
|
||
A boxing club.
|
||
Movie theater, putt-putt, and music.
|
||
|
||
Though | do foresee some undercurrent of robotic
|
||
metallurgical mining
|
||
|
||
Remote working.
|
||
Sports Complex
|
||
Energy
|
||
|
||
Medical services
|
||
Healthcare
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
50
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or
|
||
|
||
support services are
|
||
|
||
needed to strengthen the
|
||
|
||
region?
|
||
|
||
• Passenger rail is another amenity I believe is overlooked. If
|
||
|
||
we are serious about recruiting remote workers, we need an
|
||
|
||
Amtrack station.
|
||
|
||
• Commuter air travel would help
|
||
|
||
• Road improvements
|
||
|
||
Transportation
|
||
• Broadband
|
||
|
||
• Broadband
|
||
|
||
• More Broadband
|
||
|
||
• Broadband good
|
||
|
||
• Continue broadband deployment
|
||
|
||
• Broadband
|
||
|
||
• Residential Broadband would be very helpful.
|
||
|
||
• High Speed Internet
|
||
|
||
• Trending up with internet.
|
||
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
• More sites and larger acre sites
|
||
|
||
• Shell buildings
|
||
|
||
• More sites
|
||
|
||
Sites & Buildings
|
||
|
||
• Natural gas
|
||
|
||
• More natural gas
|
||
|
||
• Really good trade schools in each area of our region.
|
||
|
||
• Wayfinding and signage to area attractions for people
|
||
|
||
coming through the area.
|
||
|
||
• Aging community- need for elderly support services.
|
||
|
||
• Support services for small businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Existing businesses need better support.
|
||
|
||
• Industry partnerships on bulk ordering.
|
||
|
||
• Need for shuttle services to local attractions
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
St lakeh Ider Feedback
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or Broadband ——“*ws—S—s—C—C—CC—C—CC_CSC@ransportation
|
||
|
||
° Broadband « Passenger rail is another amenity | believe is overlooked. If
|
||
we are serious about recruiting remote workers, we need an
|
||
Amtrack station.
|
||
|
||
support services are
|
||
needed to strengthen the
|
||
|
||
Broadband
|
||
More Broadband
|
||
|
||
* Commuter air travel would help
|
||
|
||
region? * Broadband good » Road improvements
|
||
* Continue broadband deployment
|
||
» Broadband
|
||
» Residential Broadband would be very helpful.
|
||
* High Speed Internet Miscellaneous
|
||
* Trending up with internet. * Natural gas
|
||
|
||
More natural gas
|
||
|
||
Really good trade schools in each area of our region.
|
||
|
||
Sites & Buildings
|
||
|
||
° More sites and larger acre sites
|
||
|
||
° Shell buildings
|
||
|
||
Wayfinding and signage to area attractions for people
|
||
coming through the area.
|
||
|
||
Aging community- need for elderly support services.
|
||
» More sites
|
||
|
||
Support services for small businesses.
|
||
|
||
Existing businesses need better support.
|
||
|
||
Industry partnerships on bulk ordering.
|
||
|
||
Need for shuttle services to local attractions
|
||
|
||
50
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
51
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
10-Year Vision
|
||
|
||
What is your vision of
|
||
|
||
the region 10 years from
|
||
|
||
now?
|
||
|
||
• Expanded tourism and recreation opportunities for the
|
||
|
||
public.
|
||
|
||
• Welcoming area with tourism economy.
|
||
|
||
• Appalachian Mountain wisdom and traditions with focus on
|
||
|
||
remedies, arts and crafts.
|
||
|
||
• Heart of Appalachia itinerary planning including day trips
|
||
|
||
working out from other attractions outside the area.
|
||
|
||
• Sufficient lodging.
|
||
|
||
• Demand for boutique accommodations and attached dining.
|
||
|
||
Expanded Tourism
|
||
• More job opportunities.
|
||
|
||
• More jobs.
|
||
|
||
• Better jobs.
|
||
|
||
• Jobs to retain workers.
|
||
|
||
• More IT jobs.
|
||
|
||
• More IT jobs.
|
||
|
||
• Promote our area as a great place to live and work
|
||
|
||
remotely.
|
||
|
||
• Remote workers.
|
||
|
||
More Jobs
|
||
|
||
• More people.
|
||
|
||
• Population increase.
|
||
|
||
• Low cost of living, low taxes and scenic beauty will see us
|
||
|
||
growing in population again.
|
||
|
||
• Growth - people, activities, and options.
|
||
|
||
More People
|
||
• If we don't do something DIFFERENT it will fall apart.
|
||
|
||
• Package based businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Thriving community of cooperative residents.
|
||
|
||
• More recreation.
|
||
|
||
• More entrepreneurs.
|
||
|
||
• Remote medical care also will serve most of our residents.
|
||
|
||
• Better health care.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
• New manufacturing.
|
||
|
||
• Diversification of manufacturing.
|
||
|
||
• Robotic manufacturing and high skilled machining.
|
||
|
||
• Business recruitment for industry
|
||
|
||
New Industry
|
||
|
||
shakehc Ider Feedback
|
||
|
||
ISION
|
||
|
||
What is your vision of More Jobs Expanded Tourism
|
||
|
||
* More job opportunities. » Expanded tourism and recreation opportunities for the
|
||
the region 10 years from » More jobs. public.
|
||
. j » Welcoming area with tourism economy.
|
||
now? Better jobs. 9 y
|
||
« Jobs to retain workers. * Appalachian Mountain wisdom and traditions with focus on
|
||
* More IT jobs. remedies, arts and crafts.
|
||
» More IT jobs. * Heart of Appalachia itinerary planning including day trips
|
||
|
||
* Promote our area as a great place to live and work working out from other attractions outside the area.
|
||
|
||
remotely. ° Sufficient lodging.
|
||
|
||
* Remote workers. * Demand for boutique accommodations and attached dining.
|
||
More People Miscellaneous
|
||
* More people. ° If we don't do something DIFFERENT it will fall apart.
|
||
|
||
« Population increase. Package based businesses.
|
||
|
||
* Low cost of living, low taxes and scenic beauty will see us
|
||
growing in population again.
|
||
|
||
Thriving community of cooperative residents.
|
||
|
||
ae . More recreation.
|
||
* Growth - people, activities, and options.
|
||
|
||
More entrepreneurs.
|
||
|
||
Remote medical care also will serve most of our residents.
|
||
|
||
New Industry
|
||
|
||
New manufacturing.
|
||
|
||
Better health care.
|
||
|
||
Diversification of manufacturing.
|
||
|
||
Robotic manufacturing and high skilled machining.
|
||
|
||
Business recruitment for industry
|
||
|
||
51
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
52
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
More Questions
|
||
|
||
What did we not ask, that
|
||
|
||
we should have asked? • More workforce preparedness.
|
||
|
||
• More education training in general.
|
||
|
||
• Better medical care.
|
||
|
||
• Better schools
|
||
|
||
• Population loss.
|
||
|
||
• School consolidation to improve cost.
|
||
|
||
• Youth leadership
|
||
|
||
• Training future leaders - public and elected.
|
||
|
||
• Reducing coal revenues.
|
||
|
||
• Education and how the schools could do a better job of getting our youth ready for the job market.
|
||
|
||
• Plateau is excelling with infrastructure. Things with government take time but have a good team in place.
|
||
|
||
• Continuing outreach to other communities.
|
||
|
||
• Police outreach.
|
||
|
||
• Community communication and support within the county.
|
||
|
||
• Sewer treatment will need a long-term solution, recent flood heavily affected it.
|
||
|
||
What did we not ask, that we should have asked?
|
||
|
||
lakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
More Questions
|
||
|
||
What did we not ask, that What did we not ask, that we should have asked?
|
||
|
||
we should have asked? More workforce preparedness.
|
||
|
||
° More education training in general.
|
||
|
||
* Better medical care.
|
||
|
||
* Better schools
|
||
|
||
° Population loss.
|
||
|
||
* School consolidation to improve cost.
|
||
|
||
* Youth leadership
|
||
|
||
° Training future leaders - public and elected.
|
||
|
||
e Reducing coal revenues.
|
||
|
||
» Education and how the schools could do a better job of getting our youth ready for the job market.
|
||
° Plateau is excelling with infrastructure. Things with government take time but have a good team in place.
|
||
* Continuing outreach to other communities.
|
||
|
||
* Police outreach.
|
||
|
||
* Community communication and support within the county.
|
||
|
||
° Sewer treatment will need a long-term solution, recent flood heavily affected it.
|
||
|
||
52
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
53
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Additional Thoughts
|
||
|
||
• Remote worker some potential.
|
||
|
||
• Info clearing house concept.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of people to take advantage of new technology.
|
||
|
||
• Track working from home option to retain people.
|
||
|
||
• Losing lodging business to Marion and Wytheville and Bristol, more hotels would
|
||
|
||
allow for more group tours.
|
||
|
||
• One-bedroom public housing- mostly seniors but also families, county did support
|
||
|
||
during the pandemic.
|
||
|
||
• Need for more teachers who are paid well to compete with surrounding counties.
|
||
|
||
• Need to do a better job of tracking visitors to be able to market and appeal to
|
||
|
||
them.
|
||
|
||
• Trying to cross-county partner to push people through the region as an extended
|
||
|
||
vacation, people who have already driven a long distance do not mind additional
|
||
|
||
driving.
|
||
|
||
• Lodging along already established byways like Crooked Road like glamping with
|
||
|
||
low barrier to entry and homestead lodging with nicer cabins.
|
||
|
||
• Accommodations anywhere in the region supports the region, having to work to
|
||
|
||
find the lodging, campgrounds, cabins, yurts.
|
||
|
||
• More activities or options for individuals to come and stay not just stop by for a
|
||
|
||
few years.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
itional Thoughts
|
||
|
||
» Remote worker some potential. vacation, people who have already driven a long distance do not mind additional
|
||
|
||
* Info clearing house concept. driving.
|
||
|
||
« Lodging along already established byways like Crooked Road like glamping with
|
||
|
||
» Lack of people to take advantage of new technology.
|
||
peop 9 oY low barrier to entry and homestead lodging with nicer cabins.
|
||
|
||
* Track working from home option to retain people. . . ; : ,
|
||
» Accommodations anywhere in the region supports the region, having to work to
|
||
|
||
» Losing lodging business to Marion and Wytheville and Bristol, more hotels would find the lodging, campgrounds, cabins, yurts.
|
||
|
||
allow for more group tours. an . wo .
|
||
° More activities or options for individuals to come and stay not just stop by for a
|
||
|
||
» One-bedroom public housing- mostly seniors but also families, county did support few years.
|
||
during the pandemic.
|
||
|
||
» Need for more teachers who are paid well to compete with surrounding counties.
|
||
|
||
» Need to do a better job of tracking visitors to be able to market and appeal to
|
||
them.
|
||
|
||
° Trying to cross-county partner to push people through the region as an extended
|
||
|
||
53
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
|
||
August 2021
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
|
||
a Sky ye nt typ
|
||
August 2021 ; EOI | P
|
||
HICKEYGEOBAT.
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
55
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
The Cluster Verification Process
|
||
|
||
As part of an ongoing resiliency study, Cumberland Plateau PDC requested Hickey Global identify business
|
||
|
||
and industry targets that are well-suited for the region’s geography and demographics and take into
|
||
|
||
consideration the negative economic impacts of future economic downturns.
|
||
|
||
A cluster verification study was conducted to understand the region’s business environment and build a
|
||
|
||
portfolio of clusters that blends risk over multiple industry sectors.
|
||
|
||
An analysis of the updated clusters as of August 2021 appears on the following pages.
|
||
|
||
Initially, seven clusters were identified after an analysis of each sector was conducted. In the end six clusters
|
||
|
||
remained, with clear areas of focus in each. In addition to the information contained in this report, clusters
|
||
|
||
were determined using other studies completed as part of the entire project as well as input from
|
||
|
||
stakeholders and staff.
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
The Cluster Verification Process
|
||
|
||
As part of an ongoing resiliency study, Cumberland Plateau PDC requested Hickey Global identify business
|
||
and industry targets that are well-suited for the region’s geography and demographics and take into
|
||
consideration the negative economic impacts of future economic downturns.
|
||
|
||
A cluster verification study was conducted to understand the region’s business environment and build a
|
||
portfolio of clusters that blends risk over multiple industry sectors.
|
||
|
||
An analysis of the updated clusters as of August 2021 appears on the following pages.
|
||
|
||
Initially, seven clusters were identified after an analysis of each sector was conducted. In the end six clusters
|
||
remained, with clear areas of focus in each. In addition to the information contained in this report, clusters
|
||
were determined using other studies completed as part of the entire project as well as input from
|
||
stakeholders and staff.
|
||
|
||
55
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
56
|
||
|
||
Cluster Strategy
|
||
Definition
|
||
|
||
WHAT IS A “CLUSTER”?
|
||
|
||
The U.S. Small Business Administration defines clusters as geographic concentrations of organically
|
||
|
||
interconnected small, medium and large businesses, universities, non-governmental organizations, and
|
||
|
||
economic development organizations in a particular field. Cluster activities increase opportunities for these
|
||
|
||
segments to participate and promote innovation, identify research, create jobs and attract capital within a
|
||
|
||
particular industry and generally enhance regional economic growth.
|
||
|
||
Cluster Strategy
|
||
|
||
Definition
|
||
|
||
WHAT IS A “CLUSTER”?
|
||
|
||
The U.S. Small Business Administration defines clusters as geographic concentrations of organically
|
||
interconnected small, medium and large businesses, universities, non-governmental organizations, and
|
||
economic development organizations in a particular field. Cluster activities increase opportunities for these
|
||
|
||
segments to participate and promote innovation, identify research, create jobs and attract capital within a
|
||
particular industry and generally enhance regional economic growth.
|
||
|
||
56
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
1.0 FINDINGS
|
||
|
||
BINIBIINIES
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
58
|
||
|
||
1.1 Cumberland Plateau
|
||
Cluster Focus
|
||
|
||
To grow the Cumberland Plateau Region, the community should focus on the following six clusters.
|
||
|
||
Mining Fabricated
|
||
Metal
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Shared Services
|
||
& IT
|
||
|
||
Machinery and
|
||
Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Tourism Healthcare
|
||
|
||
|.] Cumberland Plateau
|
||
Cluster Focus
|
||
|
||
To grow the Cumberland Plateau Region, the community should focus on the following six clusters.
|
||
|
||
Mining Fabricated Machinery and Shared Services Tourism Healthcare
|
||
Metal Equipment & IT
|
||
Manufacturing Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
59
|
||
|
||
1.2 Cluster Strategies Overview
|
||
|
||
• Take advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for metal commodities.
|
||
|
||
• Bring together industry leaders, entrepreneurs and academics to address the mining
|
||
|
||
industry's most pressing challenges around efficiencies, future of the workforce, data
|
||
|
||
optimization and reducing carbon footprint.
|
||
|
||
• Promote the capabilities of existing mine supply, manufacturing, and service businesses
|
||
|
||
via an online database to grow opportunities beyond the region.
|
||
|
||
Mining
|
||
|
||
Fabricated Metal Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Shared Services & IT
|
||
|
||
Healthcare
|
||
|
||
Tourism
|
||
|
||
• Expand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase company presence in
|
||
|
||
the region.
|
||
|
||
• Investigate prototyping and short-run manufacturing capabilities to build local
|
||
|
||
manufacturing capacity for product customization.
|
||
|
||
• Pilot new technologies with local manufacturing companies in Industry 4.0 components
|
||
|
||
and/or partner with research institutions.
|
||
|
||
• Continue to explore BRE and industrial recruitment initiatives in high-growth sub-sectors
|
||
|
||
including batter storage and electrification.
|
||
|
||
• Assist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
• Develop Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing portfolio by promoting key skills and
|
||
|
||
inputs.
|
||
|
||
• Take advantage of existing inputs such as coal and fabricated metals to reinforce value
|
||
|
||
chain and offer streamlining to businesses from outside of the region.
|
||
|
||
• Capitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband capabilities to generate
|
||
|
||
growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
• Develop a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC based companies
|
||
|
||
through a “pipeline” to the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• With continued residential broadband deployment, train and support citizens working
|
||
|
||
from home.
|
||
|
||
• Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their
|
||
|
||
recession resiliency among tourism enterprises.
|
||
|
||
• Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV
|
||
|
||
parks and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to
|
||
|
||
current market demands.
|
||
|
||
• Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
|
||
such as agriculture and mining.
|
||
|
||
• Follow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an aging populace.
|
||
|
||
• Leverage Appalachian College of Pharmacy in recruiting on-line pharmacy operations
|
||
|
||
such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
|
||
• Conduct a healthcare leakage study to determine needed or improved services to ensure
|
||
|
||
income created in region stays in region.
|
||
|
||
|.2 Cluster Strategies Overview
|
||
|
||
— H
|
||
we
|
||
e Take advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for metal commodities.
|
||
e Bring together industry leaders, entrepreneurs and academics to address the mining
|
||
industry's most pressing challenges around efficiencies, future of the workforce, data
|
||
|
||
optimization and reducing carbon footprint.
|
||
|
||
e Promote the capabilities of existing mine supply, manufacturing, and service businesses
|
||
via an online database to grow opportunities beyond the region.
|
||
|
||
‘Ye
|
||
|
||
“¥#” Fabricated Metal Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
e Expand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase company presence in
|
||
the region.
|
||
|
||
e Investigate prototyping and short-run manufacturing capabilities to build local
|
||
manufacturing capacity for product customization.
|
||
|
||
e Pilot new technologies with local manufacturing companies in Industry 4.0 components
|
||
and/or partner with research institutions.
|
||
|
||
e Continue to explore BRE and industrial recruitment initiatives in high-growth sub-sectors
|
||
including batter storage and electrification.
|
||
|
||
| Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
e Assist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
e Develop Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing portfolio by promoting key skills and
|
||
inputs.
|
||
|
||
e Take advantage of existing inputs such as coal and fabricated metals to reinforce value
|
||
chain and offer streamlining to businesses from outside of the region.
|
||
|
||
59
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
Ry Shared Services & IT
|
||
|
||
e Capitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband capabilities to generate
|
||
growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
e Develop a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC based companies
|
||
through a “pipeline” to the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
e With continued residential broadband deployment, train and support citizens working
|
||
from home.
|
||
|
||
Tourism
|
||
|
||
\ e Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their
|
||
recession resiliency among tourism enterprises.
|
||
|
||
e Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV
|
||
parks and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to
|
||
current market demands.
|
||
|
||
e Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
such as agriculture and mining.
|
||
|
||
r AA | Healthcare
|
||
Ww.
|
||
|
||
e Leverage Appalachian College of Pharmacy in recruiting on-line pharmacy operations
|
||
such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
|
||
Follow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an aging populace.
|
||
|
||
e Conduct a healthcare leakage study to determine needed or improved services to ensure
|
||
income created in region stays in region.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
60
|
||
|
||
1.3 Recession Cluster Analysis
|
||
Industry Sector Performance During
|
||
|
||
Recessions
|
||
|
||
Resiliency planning takes into consideration the negative economic impacts
|
||
|
||
of future economic downturns. One aspect is to understand how clusters
|
||
|
||
perform during historic economic downturns. The accompanying chart
|
||
|
||
averages the past two major recessions in 2001 and 2008. Although the
|
||
|
||
total economy declined some industry sectors grew.
|
||
|
||
Two of the Cumberland Plateau’s largest industry clusters – Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
and Tourism - suffer deep declines during recessions. While its major cluster
|
||
|
||
– Mining – performs well during such events.
|
||
|
||
Because a sector is hard hit as a whole, it does not mean all the components
|
||
|
||
decline. For instance, outdoor tourism increased during the pandemic as
|
||
|
||
the industry as a whole decrease.
|
||
|
||
Traded clusters are an important consideration as they are the foundational
|
||
|
||
base of a regional economy. It is not practical to abandon a base cluster
|
||
|
||
solely based on its economic downturn performance.
|
||
|
||
This cluster strategy takes all of this into consideration by blending a
|
||
|
||
portfolio of clusters to lessen the impacts of an economic downturn while
|
||
|
||
growing the economy in the long-term.
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE QUARTERLY GDP CHANGE BY INDUSTRY 2001 & GREAT RECESSION
|
||
|
||
1.3 Recession Cluster Analysis
|
||
|
||
Industry Sector Performance During
|
||
|
||
Recessions
|
||
|
||
Resiliency planning takes into consideration the negative economic impacts
|
||
of future economic downturns. One aspect is to understand how clusters
|
||
perform during historic economic downturns. The accompanying chart
|
||
averages the past two major recessions in 2001 and 2008. Although the
|
||
total economy declined some industry sectors grew.
|
||
|
||
Two of the Cumberland Plateau’s largest industry clusters — Manufacturing
|
||
and Tourism - suffer deep declines during recessions. While its major cluster
|
||
— Mining — performs well during such events.
|
||
|
||
Because a sector is hard hit as a whole, it does not mean all the components
|
||
decline. For instance, outdoor tourism increased during the pandemic as
|
||
the industry as a whole decrease.
|
||
|
||
Traded clusters are an important consideration as they are the foundational
|
||
base of a regional economy. It is not practical to abandon a base cluster
|
||
solely based on its economic downturn performance.
|
||
|
||
This cluster strategy takes all of this into consideration by blending a
|
||
|
||
portfolio of clusters to lessen the impacts of an economic downturn while
|
||
growing the economy in the long-term.
|
||
|
||
60
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE QUARTERLY GDP CHANGE BY INDUSTRY 2001 & GREAT RECESSION
|
||
|
||
Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction
|
||
Healthcare & Social Assistance
|
||
Finance & Insurance
|
||
Government
|
||
|
||
Real Estate & Rental & Leasing
|
||
Educational Services
|
||
Information
|
||
|
||
Professional, Scientific, & Technical
|
||
|
||
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, & Hunting
|
||
Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation
|
||
Support Activities for Mining
|
||
Management of Companies & Enterprises
|
||
Mining (except oil & gas)
|
||
|
||
Utilities
|
||
|
||
Admin & Waste Management
|
||
Transportation & Warehousing
|
||
Accommodation & Food Service
|
||
|
||
Other Services (except government)
|
||
Retail Trade
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing, non-durable goods
|
||
Wholesale Trade
|
||
|
||
Construction
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing, durable goods
|
||
|
||
Total
|
||
|
||
-12%
|
||
|
||
-10% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2%
|
||
|
||
4%
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
61
|
||
|
||
1.4 Cumberland Plateau PDC Blended Cluster Portfolio
|
||
Economic Downturn Impact
|
||
|
||
Mining Fabricated
|
||
Metal
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Shared Services
|
||
& IT
|
||
|
||
Machinery and
|
||
Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Tourism Healthcare
|
||
|
||
TRADED CLUSTERS LOCAL CLUSTERBLENDED CLUSTERS
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC Blended Cluster Portfolio
|
||
|
||
Economic Downturn Impact
|
||
|
||
te:
|
||
|
||
Tourism Healthcare
|
||
|
||
TRADED BLENDED CLUSTERS LOCAL CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
61
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
62
|
||
|
||
1.5 Target Industry Verification
|
||
Cluster Quadrant Key
|
||
|
||
1.5 Target Industry Verification
|
||
|
||
Cluster Quadrant Key
|
||
|
||
GROWTH POTENTIAL
|
||
|
||
3 BEST BET
|
||
5 This the optimal quadrant. These sectors have the best
|
||
© © é skill composition and growth potential.
|
||
<=
|
||
=
|
||
So
|
||
7 ©
|
||
© a . © DUAL TRANSITION ZONE
|
||
POTENTIAL i S Small changes could drive
|
||
These sectors have strong growth potential, but a y ia strategy considerations.
|
||
weaker composition for required skills. . N
|
||
|
||
Ss
|
||
|
||
Skill Concentration
|
||
|
||
required skill
|
||
|
||
be changed with refocused economic development efforts.
|
||
|
||
Viable sectors as they already have str
|
||
|
||
LEGACY
|
||
rong concentrations of
|
||
Is. Growth is projected to be low, but this could
|
||
|
||
SKILL CONCENTRATION
|
||
|
||
62
|
||
|
||
HIGHER
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
63
|
||
|
||
1.6 Cumberland Plateau Location Quotient vs. Growth Rate
|
||
Location Quotient vs. Projected U.S. Compound Annual Growth Rate by Sector
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s mining industry is
|
||
|
||
exceptional compared to the rest of the
|
||
|
||
country, but the region has low Location
|
||
|
||
Quotients in each of the remaining sectors.
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau has the largest
|
||
|
||
competitive advantage (as measured by
|
||
|
||
location quotient) in Mining, Health Care,
|
||
|
||
and Construction. With the exception of
|
||
|
||
Health Care, these industries are projected
|
||
|
||
to decline over the next five years.
|
||
|
||
• Although Manufacturing and Professional
|
||
|
||
Services have below-average location
|
||
|
||
quotients, those sectors make up a
|
||
|
||
significant portion of the overall workforce
|
||
|
||
and are projected to increase.
|
||
|
||
• Roughly 8 percent of the region’s total
|
||
|
||
workforce is in Mining, resulting in a high
|
||
|
||
location quotient. The pace by which the
|
||
|
||
Mining sector is expected to decline is a
|
||
|
||
moderate compound annual rate of -0.78%
|
||
|
||
but may be higher depending on market
|
||
|
||
trends.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
1.6 Cumberland Plateau Location Quotient vs. Growth Rate
|
||
Location Quotient vs. Projected U.S. Compound Annual Growth Rate by Sector
|
||
|
||
S Mining Traded'Idustry Cumberland Plateau’s mining industry is
|
||
SZ xceptional compared to the rest of th
|
||
A) ry exceptioi Cana RHEE onestertite
|
||
PD @ country, but the region has low Location
|
||
§ Local Industry Quotients in each of the remaining sectors.
|
||
6% @
|
||
Blendet"ndustry LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
Administrative & Support/Waste Management e
|
||
5% |0 5 10 15 20 25 1000 BRployees ° The Cumberland Plateau has the largest
|
||
a . . competitive advantage (as measured by
|
||
qi | Professona’ Services Note: Dot Size represents location quotient) in Mining, Health Care,
|
||
1 + Manufacturing ; - Total Employment within q 8, ’
|
||
o 3% - | — Utilities 7 + Accommodation, Food & Service Occupation Group and Construction. With the exception of
|
||
Sg Educational Services - JE J | + Other Services . ; .
|
||
nN Wholesale Trade » _/ + Health Care & Social Assistance Health Care, these industries are projected
|
||
eo Agriculture * ~ WA y, Z to decline over the next five years.
|
||
5 fe 7 SY
|
||
4 J f Yd . .
|
||
§ Information 5) / e Although Manufacturing and Professional
|
||
9 0% © > / 2 | Services have below-average location
|
||
5 L © quotients, those sectors make up a
|
||
3 So Real Estate significant portion of the overall workforce
|
||
x 2% Pa + Management of Companines and are projected to increase.
|
||
A i . & Enterprises + Construction
|
||
rts, Entertainment, J .
|
||
& Recreation cs) e Roughly 8 percent of the region’s total
|
||
-3% © workforce is in Mining, resulting in a high
|
||
© location quotient. The pace by which the
|
||
5% Transportation & Warehousing » ; Mining sector is expected to decline is a
|
||
Finance & Insurance =~ moderate compound annual rate of -0.78%
|
||
but may be higher depending on market
|
||
6% © trends.
|
||
0.0 0.8 15
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
63
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
2.0 Focus Cluster Information
|
||
|
||
2.0 Focus Cluster Information
|
||
|
||
~ Sp eS tet
|
||
HICKEYGLOBAL
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
65
|
||
|
||
2.1.1 Mining - Cluster Overview
|
||
Mining
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau’s mining footprint is massive, producing 85% of Virginia’s total
|
||
|
||
output.
|
||
|
||
• Strong skill density in the region with extraordinarily high location quotients in nearly all
|
||
|
||
industries.
|
||
|
||
• Bituminous Coal and Limestone production supports auxiliary services such as tunneling
|
||
|
||
and exploration.
|
||
|
||
• High tech operations allow flexible responses to economic downturns and major health
|
||
|
||
events.
|
||
|
||
• While production has decreased in the U.S., global demand has remained relatively
|
||
|
||
stable, and exports continue apace.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
• Take advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for metal commodities.
|
||
|
||
• Bring together industry leaders, entrepreneurs and academics to address the mining
|
||
|
||
industry's most pressing challenges around efficiencies, future of the workforce, data
|
||
|
||
optimization and reducing carbon footprint.
|
||
|
||
• Promote the capabilities of existing mine supply, manufacturing, and service businesses
|
||
|
||
via an online database to grow opportunities beyond the region.
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATIONTake advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for
|
||
metal commodities.
|
||
|
||
Source: : U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Coal Report
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE PRICE PER SHORT TON (DOLLARS)
|
||
Electric Power
|
||
|
||
Coke Producers
|
||
|
||
Other Industrial
|
||
|
||
Commercial/
|
||
Institutional
|
||
|
||
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BY MINE TYPE
|
||
TOTAL
|
||
|
||
Surface Employees
|
||
Underground
|
||
Employees
|
||
|
||
Mining - Cluster Overview
|
||
Mining
|
||
Take advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for » CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
metal commodities. AVERAGE PRICE PER SHORT TON (DOLLARS)
|
||
|
||
» CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau’s mining footprint is massive, producing 85% of Virginia’s total
|
||
output.
|
||
|
||
ctric Power
|
||
|
||
Strong skill density in the region with extraordinarily high location quotients in nearly all
|
||
industries.
|
||
|
||
Bituminous Coal and Limestone production supports auxiliary services such as tunneling
|
||
and exploration.
|
||
|
||
High tech operations allow flexible responses to economic downturns and major health
|
||
events.
|
||
|
||
While production has decreased in the U.S., global demand has remained relatively
|
||
|
||
stable, and exports continue apace.
|
||
|
||
2009 2010 2011
|
||
|
||
NUMBER OF EMPL'
|
||
|
||
» POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
@ tom
|
||
|
||
. se age ¢ Surface Emplo
|
||
Take advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for metal commodities. J Underground
|
||
|
||
Bring together industry leaders, entrepreneurs and academics to address the mining
|
||
industry's most pressing challenges around efficiencies, future of the workforce, data
|
||
optimization and reducing carbon footprint.
|
||
|
||
Promote the capabilities of existing mine supply, manufacturing, and service businesses
|
||
via an online database to grow opportunities beyond the region.
|
||
|
||
100,000
|
||
|
||
65
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
66
|
||
|
||
2.1.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
Mining
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• Mining factors heavily in the employment
|
||
|
||
landscape for the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
region, with high employment density in
|
||
|
||
nearly all represented mining industries.
|
||
|
||
• Projected employment trends show major
|
||
|
||
growth or losses depending on the
|
||
|
||
industry. The highest projected growth is
|
||
|
||
found in Support Activities for Nonmetallic
|
||
|
||
Minerals.
|
||
|
||
• The location quotient for Bituminous Coal
|
||
|
||
and Lignite Surface Mining is nearly 250
|
||
|
||
times the national average.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
2.1.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
Mining
|
||
|
||
20%
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
-——« Support Activities for Nonmetallic . ae
|
||
© Minerals (except Fuels) Mining e Mining factors heavily in the employment
|
||
|
||
15% | landscape for the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
region, with high employment density in
|
||
nearly all represented mining industries.
|
||
|
||
10% + Natural Gas Extraction
|
||
|
||
Drilling Oil & Gas Wells e Projected employment trends show major
|
||
|
||
growth or losses depending on the
|
||
industry. The highest projected growth is
|
||
found in Support Activities for Nonmetallic
|
||
Minerals.
|
||
|
||
» Crushed & Broken Limestone Mining & Quarrying
|
||
5% a
|
||
Bituminous Coal & »
|
||
|
||
Lignite Surface Mining
|
||
|
||
¢ The location quotient for Bituminous Coal
|
||
and Lignite Surface Mining is nearly 250
|
||
times the national average.
|
||
|
||
0%
|
||
|
||
5% | Crude Petroleum Extraction
|
||
|
||
+ Support Activities for Oil & Gas Operations Bituminous Coal Underground Mining
|
||
|
||
Tradedihdustry
|
||
|
||
PROJECTED C.A.G.R. 2020 - 2025
|
||
|
||
-10%
|
||
Support Activities for Coal Mining _— e
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
-15%
|
||
@
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
@
|
||
-20% 1,000 Effiployees
|
||
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
66
|
||
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
67
|
||
|
||
2.1.3 Mining Cluster
|
||
|
||
211120 Crude Petroleum Extraction
|
||
|
||
211130 Natural Gas Extraction
|
||
|
||
212111 Bituminous Coal and Lignite Surface Mining
|
||
|
||
212112 Bituminous Coal Underground Mining
|
||
|
||
212312 Crushed and Broken Limestone Mining
|
||
|
||
212399 All Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining
|
||
|
||
213111 Drilling Oil and Gas Wells
|
||
|
||
213112 Support Activities for Oil and Gas Operations
|
||
|
||
213113 Support Activities for Coal Mining
|
||
|
||
213115 Support Activities for Nonmetallic Minerals
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review, Table 6.1, May 2021, preliminary data for 2020
|
||
|
||
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION, & NET EXPORTS 1950 - 2020
|
||
|
||
Million short tons
|
||
|
||
Production
|
||
|
||
Consumption
|
||
|
||
Net Export
|
||
|
||
2.1.3 Mining Cluster
|
||
|
||
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION, & NET EXPORTS 1950 - 2020
|
||
|
||
Million short tons
|
||
|
||
1,200
|
||
1,000
|
||
800
|
||
600 ° .
|
||
400
|
||
200
|
||
|
||
1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 2010 2016 2020
|
||
t ) Production
|
||
@)_ Consumption
|
||
|
||
@)_ Net Export
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Energy Info jonthly Energy Review, Table 6.1, May 2021, p
|
||
|
||
67
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
211120 — Crude Petroleum Extraction
|
||
|
||
211130 —_ Natural Gas Extraction
|
||
|
||
212111 Bituminous Coal and Lignite Surface Mining
|
||
212112 Bituminous Coal Underground Mining
|
||
212312 — Crushed and Broken Limestone Mining
|
||
212399 _ All Other Nonmetallic Mineral Mining
|
||
213111 Drilling Oil and Gas Wells
|
||
|
||
213112 Support Activities for Oil and Gas Operations
|
||
213113 Support Activities for Coal Mining
|
||
|
||
213115 — Support Activities for Nonmetallic Minerals
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
68
|
||
|
||
2.2.1 Fabricated Metal Manufacturing - Cluster Overview
|
||
Primary Sub-Clusters: Metal Tank and
|
||
|
||
Plate Work Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
• Large location quotients in Structural Metals and Boiler, Tank, and Shipping container
|
||
|
||
manufacturing indicate competitiveness in a high-skill, in-demand workforce.
|
||
|
||
• The most prominent Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing industries in the Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau Region make up a large proportion of the cluster’s payroll and annual sales.
|
||
|
||
• Demand for metal fabricated projects is rising globally.
|
||
|
||
• Growth opportunities may arise as Fabricated Metal Manufacturing companies engage in
|
||
|
||
reshoring due to increasing global wages.
|
||
|
||
• Introduction of new technologies into the fabrication process – including automation and
|
||
|
||
IoT – can lead to greater efficiencies and revenue for local businesses. IoT in particular is
|
||
|
||
amplified by the Cumberland Plateau’s broadband capabilities.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
• Expand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase company presence in
|
||
|
||
the region.
|
||
|
||
• Investigate prototyping and short-run manufacturing capabilities to build local
|
||
|
||
manufacturing capacity for product customization.
|
||
|
||
• Pilot new technologies with local manufacturing companies in Industry 4.0 components
|
||
|
||
and/or partner with research institutions.
|
||
|
||
• Educate local industries on the capabilities of new Industry 4.0 technologies and the
|
||
|
||
benefits of adopting them.
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATIONExpand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase
|
||
company presence in the region.
|
||
|
||
Source: : U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Coal Report
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL PAYROLL, ($1,000) SALES, VALUE OF SHIPMENTS, OR REVENUE ($1,000)
|
||
|
||
Annual Payroll
|
||
|
||
($1000)(RCPTOT)
|
||
|
||
Sales, Value of Shipments or
|
||
|
||
Revenue ($1000)(PAYANN)
|
||
|
||
Fabricated Metal Manufacturing - Cluster Overview
|
||
|
||
Primary Sub-Clusters: Metal Tank and
|
||
|
||
Plate Work Manufacturing
|
||
Expand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase
|
||
|
||
company presence in the region.
|
||
|
||
» CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
Large location quotients in Structural Metals and Boiler, Tank, and Shipping container
|
||
manufacturing indicate competitiveness in a high-skill, in-demand workforce.
|
||
|
||
The most prominent Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing industries in the Cumberland
|
||
Plateau Region make up a large proportion of the cluster’s payroll and annual sales.
|
||
|
||
Demand for metal fabricated projects is rising globally.
|
||
|
||
Growth opportunities may arise as Fabricated Metal Manufacturing companies engage in
|
||
reshoring due to increasing global wages.
|
||
|
||
Introduction of new technologies into the fabrication process — including automation and
|
||
loT — can lead to greater efficiencies and revenue for local businesses. loT in particular is
|
||
amplified by the Cumberland Plateau’s broadband capabilities.
|
||
|
||
» POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
Expand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase company presence in
|
||
the region.
|
||
|
||
Investigate prototyping and short-run manufacturing capabilities to build local
|
||
manufacturing capacity for product customization.
|
||
|
||
Pilot new technologies with local manufacturing companies in Industry 4.0 components
|
||
and/or partner with research institutions.
|
||
|
||
Educate local industries on the capabilities of new Industry 4.0 technologies and the
|
||
benefits of adopting them.
|
||
|
||
68
|
||
|
||
» CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL PAYROLL, ($4,000) SALES, VALUE OF SHIPMENTS, OR REVENUE ($1,000)
|
||
|
||
Fabrested Metal Product Manutectinng
|
||
|
||
Architectural and Structural Metals — | $100,323,468
|
||
|
||
Other Fabritated Metal Product | aes $76,378,561
|
||
Machine Shops; Turned Product; $crew, Nut, and Bolt — | $71,304,307
|
||
Boiler, Tank, and Shipping Container = | $37,570,331
|
||
Forging and Stamping | $33,166,341
|
||
Coating, Engraving, Heat treating, and Allied activities | $28,289,690
|
||
Cutlery and Handtool | $9,952,926
|
||
Spring and Wire Product I $9,889,443
|
||
|
||
Hardware Manufacturing i $9,145,253
|
||
|
||
200,000,000
|
||
|
||
400,000,000
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
69
|
||
|
||
2.2.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
Fabricated Metal Manufacturing – Comparable View
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• Fabricated Metal Manufacturing in the
|
||
|
||
region is largely concentrated in the Metal
|
||
|
||
Tank, Plate Work, and Fabricated
|
||
|
||
Structural Metal Manufacturing industries.
|
||
|
||
Each of these also project positive
|
||
|
||
employment growth over the next five
|
||
|
||
years.
|
||
|
||
• Aside from Machine Shops, the low-growth
|
||
|
||
industries within Fabricated Metal
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing that are present in
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau make up a smaller
|
||
|
||
portion of the region’s workforce,
|
||
|
||
presenting opportunities for successful job
|
||
|
||
transfers.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
2.2.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
|
||
Fabricated Metal Manufacturi
|
||
|
||
15%
|
||
|
||
10%
|
||
|
||
5%
|
||
|
||
0%
|
||
|
||
-5%
|
||
|
||
PROJECTED C.A.G.R. 2020 - 2025
|
||
|
||
-10%
|
||
|
||
-15%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
ng - Comparable View
|
||
|
||
Metal Tank (Heavy Guage) Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
69
|
||
|
||
Plate Work Manufacturing
|
||
Fabricated Structural
|
||
Metal Manufacturing
|
||
©
|
||
@
|
||
TradedIhdustry
|
||
| C)
|
||
Machine Shops Local dustry
|
||
° hit Nut, Screw, Rivet, & Washer Manufacturing
|
||
» Ball & Roller Bearing Manufacturing e
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
@
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
\ Total Employment within
|
||
| Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing Occupation Group
|
||
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
e Fabricated Metal Manufacturing in the
|
||
region is largely concentrated in the Metal
|
||
Tank, Plate Work, and Fabricated
|
||
Structural Metal Manufacturing industries.
|
||
Each of these also project positive
|
||
employment growth over the next five
|
||
years.
|
||
|
||
e Aside from Machine Shops, the low-growth
|
||
industries within Fabricated Metal
|
||
Manufacturing that are present in
|
||
Cumberland Plateau make up a smaller
|
||
portion of the region’s workforce,
|
||
presenting opportunities for successful job
|
||
transfers.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
70
|
||
|
||
2.2.3 Fabricated Metal Manufacturing Cluster
|
||
|
||
332111 Iron and Steel Forging
|
||
|
||
332112 Nonferrous Forging
|
||
|
||
332114 Custom Roll Forming
|
||
|
||
332117 Powder Metallurgy Part Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332119 Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal
|
||
|
||
Stamping (Except Automotive)
|
||
|
||
332215 Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and
|
||
|
||
Flatware (Except Precious) Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332216 Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332311 Prefabricated Metal Building and Component
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332312 Fabricated Structural Metal Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332313 Plate Work Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332321 Metal Window and Door Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332322 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332323 Ornamental and Architectural Metal Work
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332410 Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332420 Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332431 Metal Can Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332439 Other Metal Container Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332510 Hardware Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332613 Spring Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332618 Other Fabricated Wire Product Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332710 Machine Shops
|
||
|
||
332721 Precision Turned Product Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332722 Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, and Washer
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332811 Metal Heat Treating
|
||
|
||
332812 Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and
|
||
|
||
Silverware), and Allied Services to
|
||
|
||
Manufacturers
|
||
|
||
332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and
|
||
|
||
Coloring
|
||
|
||
332911 Industrial Valve Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332912 Fluid Power Valve and Hose Fitting
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332913 Plumbing Fixture Fitting and Trim
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332919 Other Metal Valve and Pipe Fitting
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332991 Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332992 Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332993 Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332994 Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance
|
||
|
||
Accessories Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332996 Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
332999 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal
|
||
|
||
Product Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
2.2.3 Fabricated Metal Manufacturing Cluster
|
||
|
||
_ eee
|
||
|
||
70
|
||
|
||
Silverware), and Allied Services to
|
||
Manufacturers
|
||
|
||
ee — —_—-——
|
||
a — ; NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
“ 332111 Iron and Steel Forging 332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and
|
||
> 332112 Nonferrous Forging Coloring
|
||
332114 — Custom Roll Forming 332911 —_ Industrial Valve Manufacturing
|
||
332117 Powder Metallurgy Part Manufacturing 332912 Fluid Power Valve and Hose Fitting
|
||
“ 332119 — Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Manufacturing
|
||
a Stamping (Except Automotive) 332913 Plumbing Fixture Fitting and Trim
|
||
a 332215 Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and Manufacturing
|
||
Flatware (Except Precious) Manufacturing 332919 Other Metal Valve and Pipe Fitting
|
||
° 332216 Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing Manufacturing
|
||
332311 Prefabricated Metal Building and Component 332991 Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing
|
||
Manufacturing 332992 Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing
|
||
332312 Fabricated Structural Metal Manufacturing 332993 Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing
|
||
332313 Plate Work Manufacturing 332994 Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance
|
||
332321 Metal Window and Door Manufacturing Accessories Manufacturing
|
||
332322 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing 332996 _ Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing
|
||
332323 Ornamental and Architectural Metal Work 332999 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal
|
||
Manufacturing Product Manufacturing
|
||
332410 — Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
332420 Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing
|
||
332431 Metal Can Manufacturing
|
||
332439 Other Metal Container Manufacturing
|
||
332510 Hardware Manufacturing
|
||
332613 Spring Manufacturing
|
||
332618 Other Fabricated Wire Product Manufacturing
|
||
332710 — Machine Shops
|
||
332721 Precision Turned Product Manufacturing
|
||
332722 Bolt, Nut, Screw, Rivet, and Washer
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
332811 Metal Heat Treating
|
||
332812 Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
71
|
||
|
||
2.3.1 Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing - Cluster Overview
|
||
Primary Sub-Cluster: Mining Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
• Strong density of the current Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing workforce can attract
|
||
|
||
similar firms among other verticals.
|
||
|
||
• Improved workflows and manufacturing processes have created larger market share for
|
||
|
||
smaller OEMs with high growth potential.
|
||
|
||
• Growth in equipment rentals and distribution chains will sustain positive industry trends in
|
||
|
||
the coming years.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
• Assist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
• Develop Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing portfolio by promoting key skills and
|
||
|
||
inputs.
|
||
|
||
• Take advantage of existing inputs such as coal and fabricated metals to reinforce value
|
||
|
||
chain and offer streamlining to businesses from outside of the region.
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATIONAssist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into
|
||
new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
Source: : U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Coal Report
|
||
|
||
GROSS REGIONAL PRODUCT (GRP) FOR MINING MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT
|
||
MANUFACTURING IN THE U.S.
|
||
|
||
G
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
S
|
||
|
||
S
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
G
|
||
|
||
IO
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
L
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
U
|
||
C
|
||
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
$835.3M
|
||
Earnings (2020)
|
||
|
||
$220.4M
|
||
Property Income (2020)
|
||
|
||
$25.6
|
||
Taxes (2020)
|
||
|
||
$1.1B
|
||
Total GRP (2020)
|
||
|
||
Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing - Cluster Overview
|
||
Primary Sub-Cluster: Mining Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Assist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into » CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
$835.3M| $220.4M $25.6 $1.1B
|
||
|
||
Strong density of the current Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing workforce can attract Earnings (2020) Property Income (2020) Taxes (2020) Total GRP (2020)
|
||
similar firms among other verticals.
|
||
|
||
Improved workflows and manufacturing processes have created larger market share for
|
||
|
||
smaller OEMs with high growth potential. GROSS REGIONAL PRODUCT (GRP) FOR MINING MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT
|
||
MANUFACTURING IN THE U.S.
|
||
|
||
Growth in equipment rentals and distribution chains will sustain positive industry trends in
|
||
the coming years.
|
||
|
||
>» POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
Assist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
b
|
||
1S}
|
||
2
|
||
a
|
||
fe)
|
||
“4
|
||
a
|
||
o
|
||
=
|
||
me
|
||
fe)
|
||
oO
|
||
Lu
|
||
[4
|
||
wn
|
||
n
|
||
fo)
|
||
a
|
||
o)
|
||
|
||
Develop Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing portfolio by promoting key skills and
|
||
inputs.
|
||
|
||
Take advantage of existing inputs such as coal and fabricated metals to reinforce value | | | J
|
||
chain and offer streamlining to businesses from outside of the region. 2007 2008 2009) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
72
|
||
|
||
2.3.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing – Comparable View
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing in
|
||
|
||
the Cumberland Plateau Region is
|
||
|
||
predominantly found in Mining Machinery
|
||
|
||
and Equipment Manufacturing as a
|
||
|
||
supplier industry to the Mining sector.
|
||
|
||
• The Mining Machinery and Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing industry has an exceptional
|
||
|
||
location quotient of 215, with a much
|
||
|
||
higher employment density than the
|
||
|
||
national average..
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
2.3.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
|
||
15% r
|
||
|
||
11%
|
||
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing - Comparable View
|
||
15 © Mining Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing ~
|
||
|
||
( ) @e ©
|
||
|
||
Traded dustry
|
||
Construction Machinery
|
||
C) . Lawn & Garden Tractor and Home Lawn
|
||
Localimuustry © / & Garden Equipement Manufacturing
|
||
©
|
||
|
||
{ ) i) 50 100 150 200 250
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
4%
|
||
|
||
0% — 6
|
||
|
||
4%
|
||
|
||
PROJECTED C.A.G.R. 2020 - 2025
|
||
|
||
-8%
|
||
|
||
-11%
|
||
|
||
-15% o
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group Conveyers & Conveying Equipment »
|
||
|
||
+ Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, & Stacker
|
||
Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Sporting & Athletic Goods
|
||
|
||
5 LOCATION QUOTIENT 10 15
|
||
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
72
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
e Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing in
|
||
the Cumberland Plateau Region is
|
||
predominantly found in Mining Machinery
|
||
and Equipment Manufacturing as a
|
||
supplier industry to the Mining sector.
|
||
|
||
e The Mining Machinery and Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing industry has an exceptional
|
||
location quotient of 215, with a much
|
||
higher employment density than the
|
||
national average..
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
73
|
||
|
||
2.3.3 Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing Cluster
|
||
|
||
332111 Iron and Steel Forging
|
||
|
||
333111 Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333112 Lawn and Garden Tractor and Home Lawn and
|
||
|
||
Garden Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333120 Construction Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333131 Mining Machinery and Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333132 Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333241 Food Product Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333242 Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333243 Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper Machinery
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333244 Printing Machinery and Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333249 Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333314 Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333316 Photographic and Photocopying Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333318 Other Commercial and Service Industry
|
||
|
||
Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333413 Industrial and Commercial Fan and Blower and
|
||
|
||
Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333414 Heating Equipment (except Warm Air Furnaces)
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333415 Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating
|
||
|
||
Equipment and Commercial and Industrial
|
||
|
||
Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333511 Industrial Mold Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333514 Special Die and Tool, Die Set, Jig, and Fixture
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333515 Cutting Tool and Machine Tool Accessory
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333517 Machine Tool Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333519 Rolling Mill and Other Metalworking Machinery
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333611 Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333612 Speed Changer, Industrial High-Speed Drive,
|
||
|
||
and Gear Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333613 Mechanical Power Transmission Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333618 Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333912 Air and Gas Compressor Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333914 Measuring, Dispensing, and Other Pumping
|
||
|
||
Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333921 Elevator and Moving Stairway Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333922 Conveyor and Conveying Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333923 Overhead Traveling Crane, Hoist, and Monorail
|
||
|
||
System Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker
|
||
|
||
Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333991 Power-Driven Handtool Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333992 Welding and Soldering Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333993 Packaging Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333994 Industrial Process Furnace and Oven
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333995 Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333996 Fluid Power Pump and Motor Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333997 Scale and Balance Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333999 All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose
|
||
|
||
Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336111 Automobile Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336112 Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336120 Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing
|
||
336211 Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336212 Truck Trailer Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336213 Motor Home Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336214 Travel Trailer and Camper Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336310 Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336320 Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic
|
||
|
||
Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336330 Motor Vehicle Steering and Suspension
|
||
|
||
Components (except Spring) Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336340 Motor Vehicle Brake System Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336350 Motor Vehicle Transmission and Power Train
|
||
|
||
Parts Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336360 Motor Vehicle Seating and Interior Trim
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336370 Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping
|
||
|
||
336390 Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336411 Aircraft Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336412 Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336413 Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336414 Guided Missile and Space Vehicle
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336415 Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Propulsion
|
||
|
||
Unit and Propulsion Unit Parts Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336419 Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts
|
||
|
||
and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336510 Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336611 Ship Building and Repairing
|
||
|
||
336612 Boat Building
|
||
|
||
336991 Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336992 Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank
|
||
|
||
Component Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
336999 All Other Transportation Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
2.3.3 Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing Cluster
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
332111
|
||
333111
|
||
333112
|
||
|
||
333120
|
||
333131
|
||
|
||
333132
|
||
333241
|
||
333242
|
||
333243
|
||
333244
|
||
333249
|
||
333314
|
||
333316
|
||
333318
|
||
333413
|
||
333414
|
||
333415
|
||
333511
|
||
333514
|
||
|
||
333515
|
||
|
||
Iron and Steel Forging
|
||
|
||
Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
Lawn and Garden Tractor and Home Lawn and
|
||
Garden Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
Construction Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
Mining Machinery and Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Food Product Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper Machinery
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Printing Machinery and Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing
|
||
Photographic and Photocopying Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Other Commercial and Service Industry
|
||
Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Industrial and Commercial Fan and Blower and
|
||
Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
Heating Equipment (except Warm Air Furnaces)
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating
|
||
Equipment and Commercial and Industrial
|
||
Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
Industrial Mold Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Special Die and Tool, Die Set, Jig, and Fixture
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Cutting Tool and Machine Tool Accessory
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
333517
|
||
333519
|
||
|
||
333611
|
||
333612
|
||
333613
|
||
333618
|
||
333912
|
||
333914
|
||
|
||
333921
|
||
333922
|
||
|
||
333923
|
||
|
||
333924
|
||
|
||
333991
|
||
333992
|
||
|
||
333993
|
||
333994
|
||
|
||
Machine Tool Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Rolling Mill and Other Metalworking Machinery
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Speed Changer, Industrial High-Speed Drive,
|
||
and Gear Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Mechanical Power Transmission Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Air and Gas Compressor Manufacturing
|
||
Measuring, Dispensing, and Other Pumping
|
||
Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Elevator and Moving Stairway Manufacturing
|
||
Conveyor and Conveying Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Overhead Traveling Crane, Hoist, and Monorail
|
||
System Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker
|
||
Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Power-Driven Handtool Manufacturing
|
||
Welding and Soldering Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Packaging Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
Industrial Process Furnace and Oven
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
73
|
||
|
||
333995
|
||
|
||
333996
|
||
333997
|
||
333999
|
||
|
||
336111
|
||
336112
|
||
336120
|
||
336211
|
||
336212
|
||
336213
|
||
336214
|
||
336310
|
||
|
||
336320
|
||
|
||
336330
|
||
|
||
336340
|
||
336350
|
||
|
||
336360
|
||
336370
|
||
336390
|
||
336411
|
||
336412
|
||
336413
|
||
336414
|
||
|
||
336415
|
||
|
||
Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Fluid Power Pump and Motor Manufacturing
|
||
Scale and Balance Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose
|
||
Machinery Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Automobile Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing
|
||
Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Truck Trailer Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Motor Home Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Travel Trailer and Camper Manufacturing
|
||
Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic
|
||
Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Motor Vehicle Steering and Suspension
|
||
Components (except Spring) Manufacturing
|
||
Motor Vehicle Brake System Manufacturing
|
||
Motor Vehicle Transmission and Power Train
|
||
Parts Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Motor Vehicle Seating and Interior Trim
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping
|
||
|
||
Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing
|
||
Aircraft Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
|
||
Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Propulsion
|
||
|
||
336419
|
||
|
||
336510
|
||
336611
|
||
336612
|
||
336991
|
||
336992
|
||
|
||
336999
|
||
|
||
Unit and Propulsion Unit Parts Manufacturing
|
||
Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts
|
||
and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Ship Building and Repairing
|
||
|
||
Boat Building
|
||
|
||
Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing
|
||
Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank
|
||
Component Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
All Other Transportation Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
74
|
||
|
||
2.4.1 Shared Services & IT - Cluster Overview
|
||
Primary Sub-Clusters: Computer Systems Design Services and Telemarketing Bureaus
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
• Cumberland Plateau’s Information Technology cluster is driven by employers in the
|
||
|
||
Computer Systems Design Services industry, a high-wage and skill-intensive industry with
|
||
|
||
positive projected growth.
|
||
|
||
• In June 2021, Governor Northam announced the largest award for broadband in the
|
||
|
||
history of the Commonwealth in the Cumberland Plateau region.
|
||
|
||
• Above average fiber connectivity and broadband capabilities within the region can be used
|
||
|
||
to attract remote workers as companies continue to pursue flexible office arrangements.
|
||
|
||
• Call Centers within the region are expected to grow at a Compound Annual Rate of six
|
||
|
||
percent over the next five years.
|
||
|
||
• A low cost of living paired with strong amenities is important to Call Center employees,
|
||
|
||
creating an avenue for in-migration to the region.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
• Capitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband capabilities to generate
|
||
|
||
growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
• Develop a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC based
|
||
|
||
companies through a “pipeline” to the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• With continued residential broadband deployment, train and support citizens working from
|
||
|
||
home.
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATIONCapitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband
|
||
capabilities to generate growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
U.S. CALL CENTER EMPLOYMENT 2015-2025
|
||
|
||
YEAR OVER YEAR EMPLOYMENT GROWTH IN CONTACT CENTERS 2015-2025
|
||
(PERCENTAGE)
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
United States
|
||
|
||
Shared Services & IT - Cluster Overview
|
||
Primary Sub-Clusters: Computer Systems Design Services and Telemarketing Bureaus
|
||
|
||
Capitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
capabilities to generate growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
U.S. CALL CENTER EMPLOYMENT 2015-2025
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN ee
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s Information Technology cluster is driven by employers in the 500,000
|
||
Computer Systems Design Services industry, a high-wage and skill-intensive industry with
|
||
|
||
positive projected growth. 480,000
|
||
* In June 2021, Governor Northam announced the largest award for broadband in the
|
||
history of the Commonwealth in the Cumberland Plateau region. 460,000 ~ N
|
||
* Above average fiber connectivity and broadband capabilities within the region can be used wagi —
|
||
to attract remote workers as companies continue to pursue flexible office arrangements. ’
|
||
|
||
Call Centers within the region are expected to grow at a Compound Annual Rate of six 420,000
|
||
percent over the next five years. 2015 2016 2017 #2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
|
||
|
||
* A low cost of living paired with strong amenities is important to Call Center employees, YEAR OVER YEAR EMPLOYMENT GROWTH IN CONTACT CENTERS 2015-2025
|
||
creating an avenue for in-migration to the region. (PERCENTAGE)
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
* Capitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband capabilities to generate
|
||
growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
* Develop a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC based
|
||
companies through a “pipeline” to the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
With continued residential broadband deployment, train and support citizens working from 0. 1 1 1
|
||
home. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
|
||
|
||
74
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
75
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
Shared Services & IT – Comparable View
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• Call Centers and Shared Services are high-
|
||
|
||
growth industries with a strong presence in
|
||
|
||
the Cumberland Plateau Region,
|
||
|
||
particularly in Telemarketing Bureaus and
|
||
|
||
Other Contact Centers.
|
||
|
||
• Information Technology employment in the
|
||
|
||
region is predominantly in Computer
|
||
|
||
Systems Design Services, with additional
|
||
|
||
employment in Other Computer Related
|
||
|
||
Services.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
|
||
Shared Services & IT - Comparable View
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
Call Centers and Shared Services are high-
|
||
|
||
9% Other Computer Related Services | _ .
|
||
growth industries with a strong presence in
|
||
C ) the Cumberland Plateau Region,
|
||
Telemarketing Bureaus & Other Contact Centers Traded Tidustry particularly in Telemarketing Bureaus and
|
||
7h \ e Other Contact Centers.
|
||
Local dustry e Information Technology employment in the
|
||
a 5 Computer Systems Design Services -— region is predominantly in Computer
|
||
a 7% e@ Systems Design Services, with additional
|
||
S BlendedfTndustry employment in Other Computer Related
|
||
a e Services.
|
||
“ 3% All Other Business Support Services 1,000 EMployees
|
||
G lo
|
||
< Note: Dot sre represents
|
||
‘otal Employment within
|
||
3 ran
|
||
1% ka
|
||
oO fo
|
||
lu
|
||
aw
|
||
E ©
|
||
[a
|
||
a
|
||
|
||
-1%
|
||
|
||
-3%
|
||
|
||
-5%
|
||
0 1 2 3 4
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
75
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
76
|
||
|
||
2.4.3 Shared Services & IT Cluster
|
||
|
||
423430 Computer and Software Merchant Wholesalers
|
||
|
||
519130 Internet Publishing and Web Search Portals
|
||
|
||
541511 Custom Computer Programming Services
|
||
|
||
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
|
||
|
||
541513 Computer Facilities Management Services
|
||
|
||
541519 Other Computer Related Services
|
||
|
||
56142 Telephone Call Centers
|
||
|
||
56143 Business Service Centers
|
||
|
||
56149 Other Business Support Services
|
||
|
||
611420 Computer Training
|
||
|
||
811212 Computer and Office Machine Repair
|
||
|
||
2.4.3 Shared Services & IT Cluster
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
423430 Computer and Software Merchant Wholesalers
|
||
519130 Internet Publishing and Web Search Portals
|
||
541511 Custom Computer Programming Services
|
||
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
|
||
541513 Computer Facilities Management Services
|
||
541519 Other Computer Related Services
|
||
|
||
56142 Telephone Call Centers
|
||
|
||
56143 Business Service Centers
|
||
|
||
56149 Other Business Support Services
|
||
|
||
611420 Computer Training
|
||
|
||
811212 Computer and Office Machine Repair
|
||
|
||
76
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
77
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 Tourism - Cluster Overview
|
||
Restaurants, RV Parks, Hotels, and Recreational Centers
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
• Cumberland Plateau’s Tourism is largely based on natural attractions such as state parks
|
||
|
||
and forests.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants make up the largest portion of the region’s Tourism-related workforce with
|
||
|
||
over 1,800 employees.
|
||
|
||
• Despite few employees in traditional hotels, Cumberland Plateau has a high location
|
||
|
||
quotient for RV Parks and Campgrounds, a growing industry that will benefit from the
|
||
|
||
development of the Clinch River State Park.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
• Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their
|
||
|
||
recession resiliency among tourism enterprises and strong natural assets.
|
||
|
||
• Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV
|
||
|
||
parks and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to
|
||
|
||
current market demands.
|
||
|
||
• Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
|
||
such as agriculture and mining.
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATIONBuild infrastructure to support interest created by national trends in
|
||
natural resources and eco-tourism.
|
||
|
||
TOTAL U.S. TOURISM-RELATED OUTPUT IN 2016-2019
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
||
|
||
Billions of Current Dollars
|
||
|
||
Direct TotalIndirect
|
||
|
||
Tourism - Cluster Overview
|
||
Restaurants, RV Parks, Hotels, and Recreational Centers
|
||
|
||
Build infrastructure to support interest created by national trends in » CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
natural resources and eco-tourism.
|
||
|
||
» CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s Tourism is largely based on natural attractions such as state parks
|
||
and forests.
|
||
|
||
TOTAL U.S. TOURISM-RELATED OUTPUT IN 2016-2019
|
||
|
||
Restaurants make up the largest portion of the region’s Tourism-related workforce with Billions of Current Dollars
|
||
|
||
over 1,800 employees.
|
||
2000
|
||
Despite few employees in traditional hotels, Cumberland Plateau has a high location
|
||
|
||
quotient for RV Parks and Campgrounds, a growing industry that will benefit from the
|
||
development of the Clinch River State Park.
|
||
|
||
» POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their
|
||
recession resiliency among tourism enterprises and strong natural assets.
|
||
Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV
|
||
parks and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to |
|
||
|
||
current market demands. 0 2016 2017 2018
|
||
|
||
Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
|
||
such as agriculture and mining. @
|
||
Direct O Indirect () Total
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Bureat
|
||
|
||
77
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
78
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
Tourism – Comparable View
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• Currently, tourism infrastructure industries
|
||
|
||
such as hotels and full-service restaurants
|
||
|
||
do not have a high employment
|
||
|
||
concentration in Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• Limited-Service Restaurants is the largest
|
||
|
||
industry by employment within the Tourism
|
||
|
||
sector with a location quotient of 1.5.
|
||
|
||
• Although the RV Parks and Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
industry does not require large scale
|
||
|
||
employment for operations, the region is
|
||
|
||
relatively advantaged with both a high
|
||
|
||
growth rate and location quotient.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
|
||
Tourism — Comparable View
|
||
|
||
15% &
|
||
©
|
||
9 ZL
|
||
10% RV (Recreational Vehicle) Parks ~
|
||
& Campgrounds
|
||
in -—-+ Hotels (except Casino Hotels) & Motels
|
||
N 9 -—~* Food Service Contractors
|
||
9° 5%
|
||
“ * Golf Courses & Country Clubs
|
||
S
|
||
a Limited Service Restaurants
|
||
a
|
||
Son -®
|
||
3)
|
||
a
|
||
lu
|
||
=
|
||
re
|
||
3 ~~ Full-Service Restaurants
|
||
& -5% e@
|
||
Traded'Industry
|
||
* Fitness & Recreational Sports Centers fe. ty
|
||
-10% + Cafeterias, Grill Buffets, & Buffets
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
-15% 1,000 EMiployees
|
||
0 1 2 3 4
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
78
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
¢ Currently, tourism infrastructure industries
|
||
such as hotels and full-service restaurants
|
||
do not have a high employment
|
||
concentration in Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
e Limited-Service Restaurants is the largest
|
||
industry by employment within the Tourism
|
||
sector with a location quotient of 1.5.
|
||
|
||
e Although the RV Parks and Campgrounds
|
||
industry does not require large scale
|
||
employment for operations, the region is
|
||
relatively advantaged with both a high
|
||
growth rate and location quotient.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
79
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Tourism Cluster
|
||
|
||
487210 Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water
|
||
|
||
561510 Travel Agencies
|
||
|
||
561591 Convention and Visitors’ Bureaus
|
||
|
||
713910 Golf Courses and Country Clubs
|
||
|
||
713930 Marinas
|
||
|
||
713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
|
||
|
||
721110 Hotels and Motels, Except Casino Hotels
|
||
|
||
721211 RV Parks and Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
722310 Food Service Contractors
|
||
|
||
722320 Caterers
|
||
|
||
722511 Full-service Restaurants
|
||
|
||
722513 Limited-service Restaurants
|
||
|
||
722514 Cafeterias, Grill Buffets, & Buffets
|
||
|
||
722515 Snack & Nonalcoholic Beverage Bars
|
||
|
||
CONTRIBUTIONS TO NATIONAL ANNUAL GROWTH IN REAL TOURISM OUTPUT IN 2016-2019CONTRIBUTIONS TO NATIONAL ANNUAL GROWTH IN REAL TOURISM OUTPUT IN 2016-2019
|
||
|
||
Traveler Accommodations
|
||
|
||
Food & Beverage Services
|
||
|
||
Transportation
|
||
|
||
Recreation, Entertainment, &
|
||
shopping
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL OVERALL TOURISM GROWTH
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Tourism Cluster
|
||
|
||
CONTRIBUTIONS TO NATIONAL ANNUAL GROWTH IN REAL TOURISM OUTPUT IN 2016-2019
|
||
3.0%
|
||
|
||
487210 Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water
|
||
|
||
e@ Traveler Accommodations 561510 ‘Travel Agencies
|
||
561591 Convention and Visitors’ Bureaus
|
||
_ Food & Beverage Services
|
||
2.5% e 6 713910 Golf Courses and Country Clubs
|
||
@ Transportation 713930 Marinas
|
||
@ Recreation, Entertainment, & 713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
|
||
shopping 721110 Hotels and Motels, Except Casino Hotels
|
||
2.0% 721211 RV Parks and Campgrounds
|
||
722310 Food Service Contractors
|
||
722320 Caterers
|
||
722511 ‘Full-service Restaurants
|
||
1.5% 722513 __Limited-service Restaurants
|
||
722514 Cafeterias, Grill Buffets, & Buffets
|
||
722515 Snack & Nonalcoholic Beverage Bars
|
||
1.0% ji
|
||
0.5% ¥ "| r
|
||
0.0% |
|
||
-0.5% 2016 2017 2018 2019
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL OVERALL TOURISM GROWTH
|
||
|
||
a ee
|
||
|
||
" 2.7%
|
||
2.0% 1.5%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
||
|
||
79
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
80
|
||
|
||
2.6.1 Healthcare - Cluster Overview
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
• Wide range of services offered in the region due to demographics.
|
||
|
||
• Many industries within Cumberland Plateau’s Healthcare cluster have a location quotient
|
||
|
||
above the national average, providing a high density of skills for potential employers.
|
||
|
||
• A large number of care providers leads to quality-of-life benefits that extend to other
|
||
|
||
clusters.
|
||
|
||
• With few exceptions, industries within the Healthcare cluster are expected to experience
|
||
|
||
positive growth over the next five years.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
• Follow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an aging populace.
|
||
|
||
• Leverage Appalachian College of Pharmacy in recruiting on-line pharmacy operations
|
||
|
||
such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
|
||
• Conduct a healthcare leakage study to determine needed or improved services to ensure
|
||
|
||
income created in region stays in region.
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATIONFollow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an
|
||
aging populace.
|
||
|
||
DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL HEALTH EXPENDITURES
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
||
|
||
NHE Per Capita % ChangeAnnual % change in Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index
|
||
|
||
Hospitals
|
||
|
||
Physicians & Clinics
|
||
|
||
Dental
|
||
|
||
Home Health Care
|
||
|
||
Prescription Drugs
|
||
|
||
Nursing Care
|
||
|
||
Other Health
|
||
|
||
% CHANGE IN HEALTHCARE SPENDING VS INFLATION
|
||
|
||
27 31
|
||
|
||
20
|
||
43
|
||
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
Healthcare - Cluster Overview
|
||
|
||
Follow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an
|
||
aging populace.
|
||
|
||
» CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
Wide range of services offered in the region due to demographics.
|
||
|
||
Many industries within Cumberland Plateau’s Healthcare cluster have a location quotient
|
||
above the national average, providing a high density of skills for potential employers.
|
||
|
||
A large number of care providers leads to quality-of-life benefits that extend to other
|
||
clusters.
|
||
|
||
With few exceptions, industries within the Healthcare cluster are expected to experience
|
||
positive growth over the next five years.
|
||
|
||
>» POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
Follow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an aging populace.
|
||
|
||
Leverage Appalachian College of Pharmacy in recruiting on-line pharmacy operations
|
||
such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
|
||
Conduct a healthcare leakage study to determine needed or improved services to ensure
|
||
income created in region stays in region.
|
||
|
||
U.S. Bureai
|
||
|
||
80
|
||
|
||
» CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL HEALTH EXPENDITURES
|
||
|
||
O Hospitals
|
||
@ Physicians & Clinics 31
|
||
|
||
<A
|
||
|
||
@ Dental
|
||
|
||
@ Home Health Care
|
||
(@) Prescription Drugs
|
||
|
||
7% CHANGE IN HEALTHCARE SPENDING VS INFLATION
|
||
|
||
Lot Ll
|
||
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
|
||
1981 1983 1985 1987 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 «2009-2011 «2013 «2015 «2017-2019
|
||
|
||
oO Annua
|
||
|
||
% change in Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index () NHE Per Capita % Change
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
81
|
||
|
||
2.6.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
Healthcare – Comparable View
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• Hospitals, Nursing Care Facilities, and
|
||
|
||
Services for the Elderly and Persons with
|
||
|
||
Disabilities are the highest employment
|
||
|
||
Healthcare industries in the Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau Region.
|
||
|
||
• By number of industries, a third of the
|
||
|
||
Healthcare sector in Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
is dedicated to elderly care.
|
||
|
||
• Ambulance Services has triple the location
|
||
|
||
quotient of the next densest Healthcare
|
||
|
||
industry at 5.4.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
2.6.2 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
|
||
Hea
|
||
|
||
20%
|
||
|
||
15%
|
||
|
||
10%
|
||
|
||
5%
|
||
|
||
0% ©
|
||
|
||
PROJECTED C.A.G.R. 2020 - 2025
|
||
|
||
-10%
|
||
|
||
-15%
|
||
|
||
-20%
|
||
“1
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
-5% Medical Laboratories - N
|
||
|
||
°
|
||
|
||
thcare — Comparable View
|
||
|
||
———+ Other Individual & Family Services
|
||
|
||
—— Residential Mental Health & Substance Abuse Facilities
|
||
|
||
©
|
||
|
||
+ Services for the Elderly & Persons with Disabilities
|
||
|
||
Community Food Services
|
||
|
||
* Continuing Care Retirement Communities
|
||
* Kidney Dialysis Centers
|
||
Nursing Care Facilities
|
||
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
* Ambulance Services
|
||
|
||
~~ Assisted Living Facilities
|
||
|
||
CE Diagnostic Imaging Centers
|
||
|
||
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
|
||
@ * Offices of Physical, Occupational & Speech Therapists, & Audiologists
|
||
|
||
+ Freestanding Ambulatory Surgical & Emergency Centers
|
||
|
||
-——+ Child & Youth Services
|
||
|
||
1 2
|
||
|
||
3 4
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
81
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended industry
|
||
|
||
1,000 Effiployees
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
e Hospitals, Nursing Care Facilities, and
|
||
Services for the Elderly and Persons with
|
||
Disabilities are the highest employment
|
||
Healthcare industries in the Cumberland
|
||
Plateau Region.
|
||
|
||
e By number of industries, a third of the
|
||
Healthcare sector in Cumberland Plateau
|
||
is dedicated to elderly care.
|
||
|
||
e Ambulance Services has triple the location
|
||
quotient of the next densest Healthcare
|
||
industry at 5.4.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
82
|
||
|
||
2.6.3 Healthcare Cluster
|
||
|
||
CONTRIBUTIONS TO NATIONAL ANNUAL GROWTH IN REAL TOURISM OUTPUT IN 2016-2019SHARE OF SPENDING BY MEDICAL CONDITION
|
||
|
||
Source: KFF analysis of BEA Health Care Satellite Account (Blended Account)
|
||
|
||
524114 Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers
|
||
|
||
621340 Offices of Specialty Therapists
|
||
|
||
621492 Kidney Dialysis Centers
|
||
|
||
621493 Freestanding Emergency Medical Centers
|
||
|
||
621498 All Other Outpatient Care Centers
|
||
|
||
621511 Medical Laboratories
|
||
|
||
621512 Diagnostic Imaging Centers
|
||
|
||
621910 Ambulance Services
|
||
|
||
622110 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
|
||
|
||
623110 Nursing Care Facilities, Skilled Nursing
|
||
|
||
623210 Residential Developmental Disability Homes
|
||
|
||
623220 Residential Mental and Substance Abuse Care
|
||
|
||
623311 Continuing Care Retirement Communities
|
||
|
||
623312 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly
|
||
|
||
623990 Other Residential Care Facilities
|
||
|
||
624110 Child and Youth Services
|
||
|
||
624120 Services for the Elderly and Disabled
|
||
|
||
624190 Other Individual and Family Services
|
||
|
||
624210 Community Food Services
|
||
|
||
624310 Vocational Rehabilitation Services
|
||
|
||
Ill-Defined Conditions
|
||
14%
|
||
|
||
Circulatory System
|
||
11%
|
||
|
||
Musculoskeletal
|
||
10%
|
||
|
||
Nervous System
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
Respiratory
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
Endocrine
|
||
7%
|
||
|
||
Cancers & Tumors
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Injury & Poisoning
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
Infectious Diseases
|
||
5%
|
||
|
||
Digestive
|
||
5%
|
||
|
||
Genitourinary
|
||
5%
|
||
|
||
Mental Illness
|
||
5%
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
4%
|
||
|
||
Dermatological
|
||
3%
|
||
|
||
Pregnancy & Childbirth
|
||
2%
|
||
|
||
TOTAL
|
||
|
||
$2,350
|
||
|
||
Distribution of total medical services expenditures (US $ billions), by medical condition, 2017
|
||
|
||
2.6.3 Healthcare Cluster
|
||
|
||
SHARE OF SPENDING BY MEDICAL CONDITION
|
||
|
||
Distribution of total medical services expenditures (US $ billions), by medical condition, 2017
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
524114 _ Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers
|
||
ce 621340 Offices of Specialty Therapists
|
||
Pregnancy & eat - 621492 _ Kidney Dialysis Centers
|
||
621493 Freestanding Emergency Medical Centers
|
||
Dermatological _ 621498 All Other Outpatient Care Centers
|
||
3% 621511 Medical Laboratories
|
||
Other . nee 621512 Diagnostic Imaging Centers
|
||
4% 2 Conditions 621910 Ambulance Services
|
||
Mental IlIness 622110 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
|
||
5% 623110 Nursing Care Facilities, Skilled Nursing
|
||
623210 __ Residential Developmental Disability Homes
|
||
Genitourinary _ 623220 _ Residential Mental and Substance Abuse Care
|
||
5% 623311 Continuing Care Retirement Communities
|
||
Creatas sya 623312 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly
|
||
oe 623990 Other Residential Care Facilities
|
||
Digestive 11% ¥ '
|
||
5% 624110 Child and Youth Services
|
||
624120 Services for the Elderly and Disabled
|
||
624190 Other Individual and Family Services
|
||
Infectious Diseases 624210 Community Food Services
|
||
5% 624310 Vocational Rehabilitation Services
|
||
Musculoskeletal
|
||
Injury & Poisoning 10%
|
||
6%
|
||
Cancers & Tumors
|
||
6% iawn System
|
||
Endocri
|
||
° aa - Respiratory
|
||
8%
|
||
|
||
Source: KFF analysis of BEA Health Care Satellite Account (Blended Account)
|
||
|
||
82
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
|
||
August 2021
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
|
||
August 2021
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
84
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
The Cluster Verification Process
|
||
|
||
As part of an ongoing resiliency study, Cumberland Plateau PDC requested
|
||
|
||
Hickey Global identify infrastructure deficits within the four counties that
|
||
|
||
inhibit future economic resiliency as well as assets that support
|
||
|
||
recovery/resiliency.
|
||
|
||
A gap analysis was completed taking into consideration current and future
|
||
|
||
infrastructure needs based on growth opportunities.
|
||
|
||
The gap analysis as of August 2021 appears on the following pages.
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
The Cluster Verification Process
|
||
|
||
As part of an ongoing resiliency study, Cumberland Plateau PDC requested
|
||
Hickey Global identify infrastructure deficits within the four counties that
|
||
inhibit future economic resiliency as well as assets that support
|
||
recovery/resiliency.
|
||
|
||
A gap analysis was completed taking into consideration current and future
|
||
infrastructure needs based on growth opportunities.
|
||
|
||
The gap analysis as of August 2021 appears on the following pages.
|
||
|
||
84
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
1.0 FINDINGS
|
||
|
||
BINIBIINIES
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
86
|
||
|
||
1.1 Regional Assets
|
||
Broadband, Outdoor Activities, Low Cost
|
||
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Conversation and Recreation
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Activities & Natural Beauty
|
||
|
||
• Plentiful outdoor activities (driving, bicycling, hiking,
|
||
|
||
fishing, hunting, water sports, camping, etc.)
|
||
|
||
• 52 parks
|
||
|
||
• 49 natural areas
|
||
|
||
• 45 trails
|
||
|
||
• 43 scenic drives
|
||
|
||
• 37 historical areas
|
||
|
||
• 15 playing fields, sports, and golf facilitiesLow cost
|
||
|
||
• Low labor costs
|
||
|
||
• Low real estate costs
|
||
|
||
• Low cost of living
|
||
|
||
Broadband is a star asset in the region
|
||
|
||
• Broadband capabilities are very strong in the
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau’s broadband capabilities are
|
||
|
||
not just locally exceptional but rank highly when
|
||
|
||
compared against the entire nation.
|
||
|
||
• All four counties rank in the top one-third of the counties
|
||
|
||
and county equivalents across the U.S.
|
||
|
||
1.1 Regional Assets
|
||
Broadband, Outdoor Activities, Low Cost
|
||
|
||
Broadband is a star asset in the region Outdoor Activities & Natural Beauty
|
||
e Broadband capabilities are very strong in the e Plentiful outdoor activities (driving, bicycling, hiking,
|
||
Cumberland Plateau. fishing, hunting, water sports, camping, etc.)
|
||
e The Cumberland Plateau’s broadband capabilities are e 52 parks
|
||
not just locally exceptional but rank highly when e AO natural areas
|
||
compared against the entire nation. © 5 trails
|
||
e All four counties rank in the top one-third of the counties
|
||
|
||
e 43 scenic drives
|
||
|
||
and county equivalents across the U.S. oo
|
||
e 37 historical areas
|
||
|
||
Low cost e 15 playing fields, sports, and golf facilities
|
||
e Low labor costs
|
||
e Low real estate costs
|
||
|
||
e Low cost of living
|
||
|
||
86
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
87
|
||
|
||
1.2 Regional Deficiencies
|
||
|
||
• There are presently no commercial airports in the region making
|
||
|
||
accessibility challenging and increasing time costs. The nearest
|
||
|
||
commercial airport is the Tri-Cities Airport in Blountville, TN.
|
||
|
||
• There are no Interstate Highways in the region.
|
||
|
||
Deficiencies in the transportation Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
Elementary school performance and low
|
||
graduation from high-demand post-secondary
|
||
programs
|
||
|
||
Lower technology usage among households
|
||
|
||
Lack of human capital (labor & consumers)
|
||
|
||
• Two of the four regional school districts are low-performing. Students in
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County School District perform well below the state average
|
||
|
||
(63% below). Students in Russell County School District perform 11%
|
||
|
||
below the state average. The other two major school districts perform at
|
||
|
||
or above the state average.
|
||
|
||
• In addition to professional degreed programs (pharmacy and law), nearby
|
||
|
||
Bluefield College serves the region. However, there is still a ‘brain drain’
|
||
|
||
of high-performing high school graduates as they leave the region looking
|
||
|
||
for higher educational institutions.
|
||
|
||
• Low completion numbers from high-demand, high-growth programs such
|
||
|
||
as computer science and business administration.
|
||
|
||
• While broadband capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau,
|
||
|
||
computer and internet usage are low, as evident by the lower percentage
|
||
|
||
of households that own a computer (72% vs. the U.S. average 77%) and
|
||
|
||
small percentage of households with a broadband subscription (47% vs.
|
||
|
||
69% U.S. average).
|
||
|
||
• The region’s low participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of 63%),
|
||
|
||
coupled with its small population, gives it a low labor force under 38,000
|
||
|
||
people. This will create challenges in drawing sizeable employers into the
|
||
|
||
region as many will believe that the region doesn’t have a sufficient
|
||
|
||
workforce to support their operations. Labor force participation is
|
||
|
||
particularly low amongst females (38.6%)
|
||
|
||
• At a rate less than half that of the national average and one-third of the
|
||
|
||
state average, the supply of university graduates is low in the Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau region. However, the supply of graduates from 2-year colleges is
|
||
|
||
slightly above average.
|
||
|
||
• The number of people in the region with less than a high school degree is
|
||
|
||
almost twice the U.S. average, indicating this should be a focal area for
|
||
|
||
economic development efforts.Education Sources: greatschools.org, Local School District
|
||
|
||
Human Capital Sources: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
1.2 Regional Deficiencies
|
||
|
||
LC Deficiencies in the transportation Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
mt
|
||
w
|
||
2a
|
||
|
||
e There are presently no commercial airports in the region making
|
||
accessibility challenging and increasing time costs. The nearest
|
||
commercial airport is the Tri-Cities Airport in Blountville, TN.
|
||
|
||
e There are no Interstate Highways in the region.
|
||
|
||
Elementary school performance and low
|
||
graduation from high-demand post-secondary
|
||
programs
|
||
|
||
e Two of the four regional school districts are low-performing. Students in
|
||
Buchanan County School District perform well below the state average
|
||
(63% below). Students in Russell County School District perform 11%
|
||
below the state average. The other two major school districts perform at
|
||
or above the state average.
|
||
|
||
e In addition to professional degreed programs (pharmacy and law), nearby
|
||
Bluefield College serves the region. However, there is still a ‘brain drain’
|
||
of high-performing high school graduates as they leave the region looking
|
||
for higher educational institutions.
|
||
|
||
e Low completion numbers from high-demand, high-growth programs such
|
||
as computer science and business administration.
|
||
|
||
Education Sources: greatschools.org, Local School District
|
||
|
||
Human Capital Sources: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
87
|
||
|
||
KN Lower technology usage among households
|
||
|
||
e While broadband capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau,
|
||
computer and internet usage are low, as evident by the lower percentage
|
||
of households that own a computer (72% vs. the U.S. average 77%) and
|
||
small percentage of households with a broadband subscription (47% vs.
|
||
69% U.S. average).
|
||
|
||
e
|
||
we Lack of human capital (labor & consumers)
|
||
|
||
e The region’s low participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of 63%),
|
||
coupled with its small population, gives it a low labor force under 38,000
|
||
people. This will create challenges in drawing sizeable employers into the
|
||
region as many will believe that the region doesn’t have a sufficient
|
||
workforce to support their operations. Labor force participation is
|
||
particularly low amongst females (38.6%)
|
||
|
||
e Ata rate less than half that of the national average and one-third of the
|
||
state average, the supply of university graduates is low in the Cumberland
|
||
Plateau region. However, the supply of graduates from 2-year colleges is
|
||
slightly above average.
|
||
|
||
e The number of people in the region with less than a high school degree is
|
||
almost twice the U.S. average, indicating this should be a focal area for
|
||
economic development efforts.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
88
|
||
|
||
1.3 Business and Industrial Park Parks
|
||
Regional Assets & Deficiences
|
||
|
||
• Overall, the Cumberland Plateau region has done a good job
|
||
|
||
continuing to develop industrial parks.
|
||
|
||
• Industrial parks have good utility infrastructure in place or have
|
||
|
||
plans to do so.
|
||
|
||
• Although limited in marketability, having a shell building does
|
||
|
||
attract prospects to the region.
|
||
|
||
• The reuse of existing industrial buildings as “shell” buildings is a
|
||
|
||
good strategy.
|
||
|
||
Regional DeficienciesRegional Assets
|
||
|
||
• Although there are sites throughout the region, most are smaller
|
||
|
||
parcels limiting larger impact projects.
|
||
|
||
• The great majority of sites in region are over 30 minutes from an
|
||
|
||
interstate highway.
|
||
|
||
• Road access can be challenging for truck traffic.
|
||
|
||
• Current shell building has limited potential due to design.
|
||
|
||
1.3 Business and Industrial Park Parks
|
||
Regional Assets & Deficiences
|
||
|
||
Regional Assets Regional Deficiencies
|
||
|
||
e Overall, the Cumberland Plateau region has done a good job e Although there are sites throughout the region, most are smaller
|
||
continuing to develop industrial parks. parcels limiting larger impact projects.
|
||
|
||
e Industrial parks have good utility infrastructure in place or have ¢ The great majority of sites in region are over 30 minutes from an
|
||
plans to do so. interstate highway.
|
||
|
||
e Although limited in marketability, having a shell building does * Road access can be challenging for truck traffic.
|
||
attract prospects to the region. e Current shell building has limited potential due to design.
|
||
|
||
e The reuse of existing industrial buildings as “shell” buildings is a
|
||
|
||
good strategy.
|
||
|
||
88
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
2.0 Infrastructure Assessment
|
||
|
||
2.0 Infrastructure Assessment
|
||
|
||
HICKEYGLOBAL
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
There are approximately 263 miles of freight railroad track in the Cumberland Plateau, VA.
|
||
|
||
Rail
|
||
|
||
Air
|
||
The only significant public airport in the region is Tazewell County Airport. There are three other
|
||
|
||
small private airfields in the region – Caney Ridge Airport, Flying W Airport, and Burkes Garden
|
||
|
||
Airport.
|
||
|
||
Highway Network
|
||
There are approximately 4,876 miles of highway infrastructure in the Cumberland Plateau, VA.
|
||
|
||
Source: Hickey Global Research Services
|
||
|
||
90
|
||
|
||
2.1 Infrastructure Assessment – Transportation
|
||
Air, Rail, and Highway Network
|
||
|
||
Public Transportation
|
||
Four County Transit provides low-cost transit services to all residents and
|
||
|
||
visitors of Buchanan, Dickenson, Russell, and Tazewell counties. There are
|
||
|
||
16 public and 9 college routes that run throughout the day. Four-County
|
||
|
||
Transit also offers a ‘route deviation’ service that, upon request, will deviate
|
||
|
||
up to three-quarters of a mile from their regular fixed route.
|
||
|
||
COUNTY LARGEST AIRPORT
|
||
NON-
|
||
|
||
COMMERCIAL
|
||
AIRPORTS
|
||
|
||
COMMERCIAL
|
||
AIRPORTS
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA
|
||
Grundy Municipal Airport closed in October 2019, estimated
|
||
to reopen in 2025 as Breaks Regional Airport
|
||
|
||
None None
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County, VA None None None
|
||
|
||
Russell County, VA None None None
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, VA Tazewell County Airport 1 None
|
||
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Transportation
|
||
|
||
Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics
|
||
|
||
COUNTY
|
||
TOTAL
|
||
|
||
HIGHWAYS
|
||
INTERSTATE HWYS
|
||
|
||
(Total Miles)
|
||
PRIMARY ROADS
|
||
|
||
(Total Miles)
|
||
|
||
SECONDARY
|
||
ROADS
|
||
|
||
(Total Miles)
|
||
|
||
FRONTAGE ROADS
|
||
(Total Miles)
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA 1,119 0 192 927 0
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County, VA 980 0 168 812 0
|
||
|
||
Russell County, VA 1,469 0 284 1,185 0
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, VA 1,308 0 367 939 2
|
||
|
||
HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
|
||
|
||
DAILY VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL
|
||
|
||
COUNTY TOTAL DVMT1 MILES OF ROADWAY
|
||
per 1,000 persons
|
||
|
||
TOTAL DVMT2
|
||
|
||
(Per Capita)
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL AVERAGE
|
||
Daily Traffic on
|
||
|
||
Highways
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA 501,451 2.2 24.0 1,374
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County, VA 274,981 3.6 19.2 753
|
||
|
||
Russell County, VA 656,372 2.2 24.7 1,798
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, VA 690,200 1.9 17.0 1,891
|
||
|
||
MILES OF FREIGHT RAILROAD
|
||
|
||
2.\ Infrastructure Assessment — Transportation
|
||
Air, Rail, and Highway Network
|
||
|
||
Public Transportation Rail
|
||
Four County Transit provides low-cost transit services to all residents and A There are approximately 263 miles of freight railroad track in the Cumberland Plateau, VA.
|
||
visitors of Buchanan, Dickenson, Russell, and Tazewell counties. There are
|
||
|
||
MILES OF FREIGHT RAILROAD
|
||
|
||
_ Oreo)
|
||
16 public and 9 college routes that run throughout the day. Four-County fo u i
|
||
|
||
Transit also offers a ‘route deviation’ service that, upon request, will deviate county Tazewell County
|
||
up to three-quarters of a mile from their regular fixed route. =Stransit
|
||
Russell County
|
||
|
||
Highway Network
|
||
|
||
There are approximately 4,876 miles of highway infrastructure in the Cumberland Plateau, VA. Dickenson County
|
||
HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE Buchanan County
|
||
SECONDARY
|
||
|
||
TOTAL INTERSTATE HWYS. PRIMARY ROADS
|
||
|
||
FRONTAGE ROADS
|
||
|
||
COUNTY, HIGHWAYS (Total Miles) (Total Miles) mettre) (Total Miles) 0 20 40 60 80 100
|
||
Buchanan County, VA 1,119 .
|
||
Dickenson County, VA 980 Ai r
|
||
Russell County, VA 1,469 The only significant public airport in the region is Tazewell County Airport. There are three other
|
||
Tazewell County, VA 1,308 small private airfields in the region — Caney Ridge Airport, Flying W Airport, and Burkes Garden
|
||
|
||
Airport.
|
||
DAILY VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL NON- COMMERCIAL
|
||
. BRNO ADAVERACE COUNTY LARGEST AIRPORT COMMERCIAL AIRPORTS
|
||
COUNTY TOTAL DVMT! a See ELEN eae Daily Trafic on AIRPORTS
|
||
ites Buchanan County, VA Grundy Municipal Airport closed in October 2019, estimated None None
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA 501,451 2.2 24.0 1,374 ’ to reopen in 2025 as Breaks Regional Airport
|
||
Dickenson County, VA 274,981 3.6 19.2 753 Dickenson County, VA None None None
|
||
Russell County, VA 656,372 Russell County, VA None None None
|
||
‘Tazewell County, VA 690,200 d Tazewell County, VA Tazewell County Airport 1 None
|
||
|
||
Source: Hickey Global Research Services
|
||
|
||
90
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
91
|
||
|
||
2.2 Infrastructure Assessment - Transportation
|
||
Cumberland Plateau - Airports, Highways, & Railroad Lines
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Openstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services
|
||
|
||
2.2 Infrastructure Assessment - Transportation
|
||
Cumberland Plateau - 7 Highways, & Railroad Lines
|
||
|
||
£
|
||
|
||
]7| Pikeville
|
||
sats = * Airport 4
|
||
ivaviand 9 2 4 q s = Hi
|
||
; Ke Sh XA North Maat gk ighways
|
||
f McDowell County i, /' Mercer, County: Railroad line He
|
||
Sat 46 s a Maybeury ie :
|
||
Knott County,
|
||
|
||
& Floyd ounty ¥/ eri 1 uD 7 } : ,
|
||
eee an Coal Run;\ a Phelps Ks 7 Map Key
|
||
“ Se A ¥ ;
|
||
|
||
7 Princeton.
|
||
Bradshaw, F K.\ Montcalm Cities
|
||
PR Pippa Passes. none Virgie Buchanan (County; 83 , Anawalt \X Ty ne, ‘rrr :
|
||
|
||
i Pocahontas yet") County Boundaries |}
|
||
|
||
160 s ; iles'Col
|
||
- u q16) rea Giles'Co\
|
||
|
||
rag 598!
|
||
ee
|
||
|
||
~
|
||
|
||
letther County < a Mazewelll County] Graton Bland County
|
||
whitesbug fa
|
||
|
||
er iste Bluff, Bland
|
||
Raven 77
|
||
|
||
STAZEWELL (COUNTY, AIRPORT;
|
||
Claypool Hil
|
||
|
||
ae
|
||
|
||
Goebi 29)
|
||
en Norton County S
|
||
|
||
nal '58 Saint-Paul
|
||
JBI Steps Gap jpannnnnennnnnannnnnnon AT Castlewood Saltuile
|
||
|
||
Dungannon
|
||
|
||
tats
|
||
;MeMullin
|
||
|
||
20 mi - Carroll Cou)
|
||
lickelswille . : ;
|
||
= Ak Washington comp
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Qpenstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services
|
||
|
||
91
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
92
|
||
|
||
2.3.1 Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
Companies and site selectors have taken note of a shift in perception around
|
||
|
||
broadband, as reliable high-speed connections become more important for offices
|
||
|
||
and their employees. Fortunately, broadband capabilities are very strong in the
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau. Buchanan County is the strongest county in the region with
|
||
|
||
100% fiber penetration and 100% of the region’s census tracts with access to wired
|
||
|
||
broadband coverage. In the U.S. County Broadband Statistics for 2020 report, by
|
||
|
||
BroadbandNow, Buchanan County ranks 8th highest in the nation (out of 3,143
|
||
|
||
counties and county equivalents) for broadband service availability.
|
||
|
||
COUNTY
|
||
BROADBAND
|
||
|
||
SERVICE RANK
|
||
FIBER
|
||
|
||
PENETRATION
|
||
|
||
# OF WIRED
|
||
BROADBAND
|
||
PROVIDERS
|
||
|
||
LOWEST MONTHLY
|
||
PRICE
|
||
|
||
% OF CENSUS
|
||
TRACKS WITH WIRED
|
||
|
||
BROADBAND
|
||
COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA 8 100.00% 3 $61.99 100.00%
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County, VA 423 84.10% 3 $70.00 97.70%
|
||
|
||
Russell County, VA 1,131 69.10% 4 $67.00 88.70%
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, VA 611 43.30% 3 $71.66 95.60%
|
||
|
||
*Note: Broadband Now is an initiative developed in the aftermath of the FCC’s decision to cut funding for
|
||
broadband mapping. The analysis is based on FCC and Census data, as well as proprietary datasets such as
|
||
submissions from ISPs. The Broadband Service Rank is derived from the percentage of census tracks with wired
|
||
broadband coverage for each U.S. county and independent city (county equivalent).
|
||
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow (https://broadbandnow.com/research/county-broadband-statistics)
|
||
|
||
BROADBAND CAPABILITIES
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
IB
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
T
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
IO
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
#
|
||
O
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
W
|
||
|
||
IR
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
D
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
O
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
ID
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
S
|
||
|
||
2.3.1 Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
Companies and site selectors have taken note of a shift in perception around BROADBAND CAPABILITIES
|
||
broadband, as reliable high-speed connections become more important for offices
|
||
|
||
and their employees. Fortunately, broadband capabilities are very strong in the 100%
|
||
Cumberland Plateau. Buchanan County is the strongest county in the region with
|
||
100% fiber penetration and 100% of the region’s census tracts with access to wired
|
||
broadband coverage. In the U.S. County Broadband Statistics for 2020 report, by
|
||
BroadbandNow, Buchanan County ranks 8th highest in the nation (out of 3,143
|
||
counties and county equivalents) for broadband service availability.
|
||
|
||
80%
|
||
|
||
60%
|
||
|
||
FIBER PENETRATION
|
||
|
||
# OF WIRED % OF CENSUS ;
|
||
BROADBAND LOWEST MONTHLY TRACKS WITH WIRED 40%
|
||
|
||
PROVIDERS Ale? one
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA 8 100.00% 3 $61.99 100.00%
|
||
|
||
BROADBAND FIBER
|
||
|
||
COUNTY SERVICERANK — PENETRATION
|
||
|
||
w
|
||
# OF WIRED BB PROVIDERS
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County, VA 423 84.10% 3 $70.00 97.70% 20%
|
||
|
||
Russell County, VA 1,131 69.10% 4 $67.00 88.70%
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, VA 611 43.30% 3 $71.66 95.60% 0% 0
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County Dickenson County RussellCounty Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
*Note: Broadband Now is an initiative developed in the aftermath of the FCC’s decision to cut funding for
|
||
broadband mapping. The analysis is based on FCC and Census data, as well as proprietary datasets such as
|
||
submissions from ISPs. The Broadband Service Rank is derived from the percentage of census tracks with wired
|
||
broadband coverage for each U.S. county and independent city (county equivalent).
|
||
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow (https://broadbandnow.com/research/county-broadband-statistics)
|
||
|
||
92
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
100 MBPS
|
||
|
||
1 GBPS
|
||
|
||
93
|
||
|
||
2.3.2 Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
Virginia’s broadband coverage is well distributed throughout the state, as 65% of
|
||
|
||
the state’s counties and independent cities have broadband coverage of 80% or
|
||
|
||
more. Cumberland Plateau is well positioned in this competitive environment: in
|
||
|
||
addition to Buchanan County’s best-in-class broadband coverage, Dickenson and
|
||
|
||
Tazewell perform above the state’s average and Tazewell’s 88.7% coverage is equal
|
||
|
||
to the state’s median. Outside of Southwestern Virginia, the state’s most connected
|
||
|
||
regions are largely concentrated along the eastern border.
|
||
|
||
AREA NATIONAL RANK
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County 8
|
||
|
||
Bristol 11
|
||
|
||
Franklin City 17
|
||
|
||
Bland County 23
|
||
|
||
Bedford City 24
|
||
|
||
Manassas Park 82
|
||
|
||
Lexington 89
|
||
|
||
Winchester 118
|
||
|
||
Covington 126
|
||
|
||
Radford 130
|
||
|
||
… …
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County 423
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County 611
|
||
|
||
Russell County 1,131
|
||
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow
|
||
|
||
TOP VIRGINIA COUNTIES/INDEPENDENT CITIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
2.3.2 Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
Virginia’s broadband coverage is well distributed throughout the state, as 65% of TOP VIRGINIA COUNTIES/INDEPENDENT CITIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
the state’s counties and independent cities have broadband coverage of 80% or
|
||
|
||
more. Cumberland Plateau is well positioned in this competitive environment: in
|
||
|
||
addition to Buchanan County’s best-in-class broadband coverage, Dickenson and Buchanan County 8
|
||
|
||
Tazewell perform above the state’s average and Tazewell’s 88.7% coverage is equal Bristol ll
|
||
|
||
to the state’s median. Outside of Southwestern Virginia, the state’s most connected Franklin City 7
|
||
|
||
regions are largely concentrated along the eastern border. bland County 33
|
||
Bedford City 24
|
||
Manassas Park 82
|
||
Lexington 89
|
||
Winchester 118
|
||
|
||
100 MBPS Covington 126
|
||
|
||
Radford 130
|
||
Dickenson County 423
|
||
Tazewell County 611
|
||
|
||
Russell County 1,131
|
||
|
||
93
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
94
|
||
|
||
2.3.3 Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
Broadband – National Overview
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau’s
|
||
|
||
broadband capabilities are not
|
||
|
||
just locally exceptional, but rank
|
||
|
||
highly when compared against
|
||
|
||
the entire nation. Buchanan
|
||
|
||
County’s rank of 8 is out of
|
||
|
||
3,143 total regions. Even the
|
||
|
||
lowest ranking county in the
|
||
|
||
region, Russell County, ranks
|
||
|
||
higher than two-thirds of the
|
||
|
||
counties and county equivalents
|
||
|
||
across the U.S.
|
||
|
||
NATIONAL RANK COUNTY STATE
|
||
|
||
1 Nassau New York
|
||
|
||
2 Richmond New York
|
||
|
||
3 Sullivan Tennessee
|
||
|
||
4 Whitfield Georgia
|
||
|
||
5 Bulloch Georgia
|
||
|
||
6 Hamblen Tennessee
|
||
|
||
7 Meade Kentucky
|
||
|
||
8 Buchanan Virginia
|
||
|
||
9 Morgan Tennessee
|
||
|
||
10 McCreary Kentucky
|
||
|
||
… … …
|
||
|
||
423 Dickenson Virginia
|
||
|
||
611 Tazewell Virginia
|
||
|
||
1,131 Russell Virginia
|
||
|
||
… … …
|
||
|
||
3,141 Esmeralda Nevada
|
||
|
||
3,142 Banner Nebraska
|
||
|
||
3,143 Yakutat Alaska
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow
|
||
|
||
TOTAL TOP COUNTIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
2.3.3 Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
|
||
Broadband — National Overview
|
||
|
||
The
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s
|
||
|
||
broadband capabilities are not
|
||
just locally exceptional, but rank
|
||
highly when compared against
|
||
the entire nation. Buchanan
|
||
County’s rank of 8 is out of
|
||
3,143 total regions. Even the
|
||
lowest ranking county in the
|
||
region, Russell County, ranks
|
||
higher than two-thirds of the
|
||
counties and county equivalents
|
||
across the U.S.
|
||
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow
|
||
|
||
TOTAL TOP COUNTIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
NATIONAL RANK
|
||
|
||
Oo ON Do BW DY
|
||
|
||
an
|
||
[o)
|
||
|
||
423
|
||
611
|
||
1,131
|
||
|
||
3,141
|
||
3,142
|
||
3,143
|
||
|
||
COUNTY
|
||
|
||
Nassau
|
||
Richmond
|
||
Sullivan
|
||
Whitfield
|
||
Bulloch
|
||
Hamblen
|
||
Meade
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
Morgan
|
||
McCreary
|
||
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
|
||
Russell
|
||
|
||
Esmeralda
|
||
Banner
|
||
|
||
Yakutat
|
||
|
||
STATE
|
||
New York
|
||
New York
|
||
|
||
Tennessee
|
||
Georgia
|
||
Georgia
|
||
|
||
Tennessee
|
||
|
||
Kentucky
|
||
Virginia
|
||
Tennessee
|
||
|
||
Kentucky
|
||
|
||
Virginia
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Nevada
|
||
|
||
Nebraska
|
||
Alaska
|
||
|
||
94
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
95
|
||
|
||
2.4.1 Infrastructure – School System
|
||
Elementary, Middle, and Secondary
|
||
|
||
Schools
|
||
High school graduation rates are well above the U.S. average (86%
|
||
|
||
in 2018-2019) in the Cumberland Plateau. The Buchanan County
|
||
|
||
School District is reportedly the lowest performing in the region with
|
||
|
||
63% of its students performing academically below the state’s
|
||
|
||
average. Zero percent of students in Tazewell and Dickenson
|
||
|
||
counties, and 11% of students in Russell County were below the
|
||
|
||
state’s average. Close to 60% of students in Dickenson, Russell,
|
||
|
||
and Tazewell reported ‘above average’ academic progress.
|
||
|
||
DISTRICT NAME
|
||
PUBLIC
|
||
|
||
SCHOOLS
|
||
PUBLIC SCHOOL
|
||
|
||
STUDENTS
|
||
STUDENTS PER
|
||
|
||
TEACHER
|
||
|
||
TOTAL DISTRICT
|
||
SPENDING
|
||
(Millions)
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE
|
||
SPENDING PER
|
||
|
||
STUDENT
|
||
|
||
% STUDENT
|
||
PROFICIENCY IN
|
||
|
||
SCIENCE
|
||
|
||
% STUDENT
|
||
PROFICIENCY IN
|
||
READING/ENGLI
|
||
|
||
SH
|
||
|
||
% STUDENT
|
||
PROFICIENCY IN
|
||
|
||
MATH
|
||
|
||
4-YEAR HIGH
|
||
SCHOOL
|
||
|
||
GRADUATION
|
||
RATE
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA 10 2,758 13 $33.5 $10,875 81% 70% 81% 87%
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County, VA 5 2,054 14 $25.2 $10,651 78% 83% 89% 95%
|
||
|
||
Russell County, VA 14 3,785 14 $39.3 $9,307 90% 83% 93% 92%
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, VA 16 5,653 14 $61.5 $9,259 86% 82% 86% 92%
|
||
|
||
Source: greatschools.org, Local School District
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE SPENDING PER STUDENT TOTAL DISTRICT SPENDING
|
||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
||
|
||
2.4.\ Infrastructure — School System
|
||
Elementary, Middle, and Secondary
|
||
Schools
|
||
|
||
High school graduation rates are well above the U.S. average (86%
|
||
in 2018-2019) in the Cumberland Plateau. The Buchanan County
|
||
School District is reportedly the lowest performing in the region with
|
||
63% of its students performing academically below the state’s
|
||
average. Zero percent of students in Tazewell and Dickenson
|
||
counties, and 11% of students in Russell County were below the
|
||
state’s average. Close to 60% of students in Dickenson, Russell,
|
||
and Tazewell reported ‘above average’ academic progress.
|
||
|
||
DISTRICT NAME
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County, VA
|
||
Dickenson County, VA
|
||
Russell County, VA
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, VA
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE SPENDING PER STUDENT
|
||
|
||
$10,600
|
||
|
||
9,200
|
||
|
||
7,800
|
||
|
||
6,400
|
||
|
||
$9,259
|
||
|
||
5,000
|
||
Buchanan County Dickenson County Russell County Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
Public Schools — Public Schools = Public Schools ~— Public Schools
|
||
|
||
Source: greatschools.org, Local Schoo! District
|
||
|
||
95
|
||
|
||
4-YEAR HIGH
|
||
SCHOOL
|
||
|
||
% STUDENT
|
||
|
||
TOTAL DISTRICT PROFICIENCY IN
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE % STUDENT % STUDENT
|
||
|
||
PUBLIC
|
||
|
||
PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS PER
|
||
|
||
SPENDING SPENDING PER PROFICIENCY IN i PROFICIENCY IN
|
||
SCHOOLS STUDENTS TEACHER (Millions) STUDENT SCIENCE READING! ENGLI MATH GRA oN
|
||
10 2,758 13 $33.5 $10,875 81% 70% 81% 87%
|
||
S) 2,054 14 $25.2 $10,651 78% 83% 89% 95%
|
||
14 3,785 14 $39.3 $9,307 90% 83% 93% 92%
|
||
16 5,653 14 $61.5 $9,259 86% 82% 86% 92%
|
||
TOTAL DISTRICT SPENDING
|
||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
||
60
|
||
$61.5 M
|
||
50
|
||
40
|
||
30
|
||
20
|
||
10
|
||
$0
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County Dickenson County Russell County
|
||
Public Schools
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
Public Schools Public Schools — Public Schools
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
96
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Infrastructure – School System
|
||
Post-Secondary Schools
|
||
|
||
Southwest Virginia Community College is the largest post-secondary school in
|
||
|
||
the region. The Cumberland Plateau also has two institutions specializing in
|
||
|
||
professional degrees with the Appalachian School of Law and Appalachian
|
||
|
||
College of Pharmacy. Altogether, these institutions produced over 600
|
||
|
||
graduates, with a majority coming from the community college. The largest
|
||
|
||
number of graduates from Southwest Virginia Community College were from
|
||
|
||
Liberal Arts (152), Healthcare (131) , Child Care (36), Electronical/Electronics
|
||
|
||
Maintenance (31), and Business Administration (28) programs. There were only
|
||
|
||
7 graduates from Computer and Information Sciences programs. In addition,
|
||
|
||
nearby Bluefield College serves the region as a four-year university.
|
||
|
||
UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE
|
||
ENROLLME
|
||
|
||
NT
|
||
GRADUATES CITY STATE COUNTY
|
||
|
||
Appalachian School of Law 164 90 Grundy VA Buchanan County
|
||
|
||
Appalachian College of Pharmacy 216 63 Oakwood VA Buchanan County
|
||
|
||
Southwest VA Community College 2,338 482 Cedar Bluff VA Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Openstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services, NCES IPEDs
|
||
|
||
POST-SECONDARY SCHOOLS
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Infrastructure — School System
|
||
Post-Secondary Schools
|
||
|
||
Southwest Virginia Community College is the largest post-secondary school in POST-SECONDARY SCHOOLS
|
||
the region. The Cumberland Plateau also has two institutions specializing in
|
||
professional degrees with the Appalachian School of Law and Appalachian
|
||
|
||
College of Pharmacy. Altogether, these institutions produced over 600 Appalachian School of Law 164 90 Grundy VA Buchanan County
|
||
graduates, with a majority coming from the community college. The largest
|
||
|
||
UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE EERO ME GRADUATES city STATE COUNTY
|
||
|
||
Appalachian College of Pharmacy 216 63 Oakwood VA Buchanan County
|
||
number of graduates from Southwest Virginia Community College were from
|
||
Liberal Arts (152), Healthcare (131), Child Care (36), Electronical/Electronics Southwest VA Community College 2,338 482 Cedar Bluff = VA Tazewell County
|
||
Maintenance (31), and Business Administration (28) programs. There were only
|
||
7 graduates from Computer and Information Sciences programs. In addition, ee Ae AC an
|
||
|
||
nearby Bluefield College serves the region as a four-year university. =) E Pmeicounty ° % hoa oe
|
||
Pg A aging Crutibler Safe
|
||
|
||
McDowell County
|
||
bstiey ‘Anawalt
|
||
, Py f
|
||
|
||
sored @ ppalche Pe Bionats :
|
||
|
||
Washington County
|
||
|
||
source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Openstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services, NCES IPEDs
|
||
|
||
96
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
97
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 Infrastructure Assessment – Major Employers
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
COMPANY CITY EMPL
|
||
Aasc Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Alcoa Wheel Products Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Agency For Sr Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power Co Clinch Cleveland 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Appalachian School Of Law Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Applebee's Grill + Bar Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Aramark Uniform Svc Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
AT&T Wireless Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Austin Sales Inc Vansant 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Bluefield Beverage Co Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Bluefield College Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Buchanan General Hospital Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Cardno Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
CGI Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Cimarron Coach Of Virginia Falls Mills 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Clinch Valley Health Richlands 500 to 999
|
||
|
||
Clinch Valley Med Ctr Senior Richlands 500 to 999
|
||
|
||
CNX Gas Corporation Cedar Bluff 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Coronado Global Resources Raven 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
E Dillon & Co Swords Creek 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Emats Inc Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
First Community Bankshares Inc Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Food City Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Food City Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Food City Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Food City Vansant 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Food City Vansant 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Gasco Drilling Inc Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Genesis Health Care LLC Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Genesis Healthcare LLC Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Hawk's Nest Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Heritage Hall Grundy Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Heritage Hall Tazewell Tazewell 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Honaker Elem & Middle Sch Honaker 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Honaker Elementary School Honaker 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Issues & Answers Network Inc Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
JENNMAR Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
K S & J Roustabout North Tazewell 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Kindred Healthcare Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
KNOX Creek Coal Corp Raven 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
COMPANY CITY EMPL
|
||
Komatsu Mining Corp Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Kroger Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Kroger Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Kroger Richlands 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
K-VA-T Food Stores Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Lear Corp Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Lebanon Apparel Corp Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Local Net Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Local Net Richlands 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Lowe's Home Improvement Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Lowe's Home Improvement Pounding Mill 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Mountain Materials Castlewood 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Murray American Energy Inc Mavisdale 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Murray American Energy Inc Raven 500 to 999
|
||
|
||
New Peoples Bank Inc Honaker 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
New Peoples Bankshares Inc Honaker 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Noah W Horn Well Drilling Inc Oakwood 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Northrop Grumman Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Pemco Corp Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Pounding Mill Quarry Corp Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Pyott-Boone Electronics Inc North Tazewell 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Richlands High School Richlands 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Richlands Middle School Richlands 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Riverview Elementary/Mddl Schl Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Russell County Medical Ctr Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Russell Loungewear Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
S T Pipeline Clintwood 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Sam's Club Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Samuel Pressure Vessel Group Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
School Board-Tazewell County Tazewell 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Serco Clintwood Up to 100
|
||
|
||
Southern Railway System Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Tadano Mantis Corporation Richlands 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Tazewell Community Hospital Tazewell 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
Walmart Supercenter Grundy 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Walmart Supercenter Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
Walmart Supercenter Pounding Mill 250 to 499
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 Infrastructure Assessment — Major Employers
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Zebulon Majed Mingo County mR - hal d COMPANY CITY EMPL COMPANY CITY EMPL
|
||
a Phelps On ad Wyoming County “S, ‘Aasc Cedar Bluff 100 to 249 Komatsu Mining Corp Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
Kimper call * Major Employers ‘Alcoa Wheel Products Lebanon 250 to 499 Kroger Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
wakes wy ‘Appalachian Agency For Sr Cedar Butt 100t0249 Kroger Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
Kroger Richlands 100 to 249
|
||
hag} {isa} ieaestote @ 1-20 ‘Appalachian Power Co Clinch Cleveland 100 to 249 KYAT Food Stores Cedar Bluff 100 to 249
|
||
Shelbiana
|
||
[a19} [7a9)) Pike County oral Kdetiton Say @ 250 - 500 ‘Appalachian School Of Law Grundy 100 to 249 Lear Corp Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
RY
|
||
RY iene wan Coen wy foman j YY | Applebee's Gil + Bar Bluefield 100 to249 Lebanon Apparel Corp Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
Maaytisurh, © call ‘Aramark Uniform Svc Bluefield 100 to 249 Local Net Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
Bradshaw bo pation ; ‘AT&T Wireless Lebanon 250to499 Local Net Richlands 100 to 249
|
||
\Béitley a en Cin, — ‘Austin Sales Inc Vansant 100to249 Lowe's Home Improvement Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
Aramark Uniforn® Sve Bluefield Beverage Co Bluefield 100t0249 Lowe's Home Improvement Pounding Mill 100 to 249
|
||
we a JenkinjonBlue field Be’ t : Bluefield College Bluefield 1000249 “Mountain Materials Castlewood 100 to. 249
|
||
Berwind ’ t cel nl General Hospital — 7 . 7 Murray American Energy Inc Mavisdale 250 to 499
|
||
Hawk's Nest ® rou cry eeyaiey msc: cel Lebanon 25010499 Muay American Energyinc Raven Santo 388
|
||
% ") Cimarron Coach Of Virginia Falls Mills 100t0.249 New Peoples Bank nc Honaker 26010499
|
||
Tiptop Kroger : " re ; New Peoples Bankshares Inc Honaker 100 to 249
|
||
Ok ner Pane Famonste) Po 4 Lowe; en ran Clinch Valley Health Richlands 500 to 999 Noah W Horn Well Diline i 10010249
|
||
b Pyott-Boone Electronics )fz9} ee a (clinch Valley Med Ctr Senior Richlands 500 to 999 Nth om nung ne a hal : 7
|
||
Reena srart 8] .
|
||
God ‘School Board-Tazewell ‘ CNX Gas Corporation Cedar Bluff 250 to 499 Pema con Bluteld 100 bo 249
|
||
i oe
|
||
Clinch Valley Health | rc PO cvivage at ‘Bland County | _[°%0"#40 Global Resources Raven 25010499 bounding Mill Quarry Corp Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
Kroger) sp Murray American Energy) Tazewell Hospital EDillon & Co Swords Creek 100 to 249 . 5
|
||
[s0} avenge rood. City Emats Inc Cedar Bluff 100 to 249 ne a secre Inc Nort Teel 10 2
|
||
Emats inc wane First Community Bankshares Inc Bluefield 1o0te 249 NeNands igh Soto venvan’s °
|
||
HoNaker Elem & le Sch ‘Claypool Hill ~ Richlands Middle School Richlands 100 to 249
|
||
-Honiaker Elem & Middle Sch{ i i
|
||
fev? asco Dilling fees a a 5 iat a a Riverview Elementary/Mddl Schl Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
or PER aol So sAasc 7 Food City Lebanon 100to.249 Russell County Medical Ctr Lebanon 100 to 249
|
||
{as} 5 Food City Vansant 100 to 249 Russell Loungewear Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
Food City Vansant 100 to 249 ST Pipeline Clintwood 100 to 249
|
||
Gasco Drilling Inc Cedar Bluff 100 to 249 Sam's Club Bluefield 100 to 249
|
||
Genesis Health Care LLC Bluefield 100to249 Samuel Pressure Vessel Group Lebanon 250 to. 499
|
||
Suttson.6 . JGenesis Healthcare LLC Bluefield 100 to 249 School Board-Tazewell County Tazewell 100 to 249
|
||
sense. 10 Hawk's Nest Grundy 100 to 249 .
|
||
altville 9 4 “ a Serco Clintwood Up to 100
|
||
Heritage Hall Grundy Grundy 100 to 249 Southern Railway Syst Grund 100 to. 249
|
||
Heritage Hall Tazewell Tazewell 100 to 249 ournem alway ys em run y °
|
||
Dungannon Honaker Elem & Middle Sch Honaker 10010249 [adanoMantis Corporation _—Richlands 260 0 499
|
||
Wires Mettu Tazewell Community Hospital Tazewell 100 to. 249
|
||
Brumley Gap aie yo Honaker Elementary School Honaker 100 to 249 zee Comune ese azewe °
|
||
Scott Count Glade Spring Adwolt Walmart Supercenter Grundy 250 to 499
|
||
Washington Countyz2.,,, Sugar/Grove Issues & Answers Network Inc Grundy 100to249 Walmart Supercenter Lebanon 250 to 499
|
||
eas JENNMAR Cedar Bluff 100 to 249 Walmart Supercenter Pounding Mill 250 to 499
|
||
0 Gray c { KS &J Roustabout North Tazewell 100 to 249
|
||
a x yson County) | kindred Healthcare Grundy 100 to 249
|
||
$55458 Source: US Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Openstreeimaps, VCEDA, Data Ade Reference Solutions, Hickay Global Research Senvices KNOX Creek Coal Corp Raven 100 to 249
|
||
|
||
97
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
98
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Infrastructure Assessment – Natural Resources
|
||
Timber and Forestry
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s total timberland area is
|
||
|
||
862,527 acres, roughly 6% of Virginia’s total. The
|
||
|
||
vast majority of timberlands are privately owned.
|
||
|
||
Products created by Cumberland Plateau’s
|
||
|
||
roundwood timber include bioenergy, pulpwood, and
|
||
|
||
saw logs. The Cumberland Plateau had two mills
|
||
|
||
listed in the 2019 survey, one in Buchanan County
|
||
|
||
and the other in Tazewell County, both producing
|
||
|
||
saw logs.
|
||
|
||
Source: USDA Forest Service
|
||
|
||
TOTAL VOLUME OF TIMBER PRODUCT TOTAL AREA OF TIMBERLAND
|
||
(1000 Cubic Feet)
|
||
|
||
VOLUME OF TIMBER PRODUCT BY COUNTY 2019
|
||
|
||
(Acres)
|
||
|
||
REGION
|
||
TOTAL VOLUME OF
|
||
TIMBER PRODUCT
|
||
|
||
(MCF)
|
||
|
||
VOLUME OF ROUNDWOOD
|
||
(GREEN TONS)
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County 4,618 169,306
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County 13,364 493,054
|
||
|
||
Russell County 1,191 44,184
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County 13,159 486,422
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau 32,332 1,192,966
|
||
|
||
AREA OF TIMBERLAND BY COUNTY AND MAJOR OWNERSHIP GROUP
|
||
|
||
REGION TOTAL PUBLIC OWNERSHIP PRIVATE OWNERSHIP
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County 294,555 6,138 288,417
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County 195,999 17,261 178,738
|
||
|
||
Russell County 147,344 11,360 135,984
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County 224,629 2,939 221,690
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau 862,527 37,698 824,829
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Infrastructure Assessment — Natural Resources
|
||
Timber and Forestry
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s total timberland area is VOLUME OF TIMBER PRODUCT BY COUNTY 2019 AREA OF TIMBERLAND BY COUNTY AND MAJOR OWNERSHIP GROUP
|
||
862,527 acres, roughly 6% of Virginia’s total. The REGION TIMBER PRODUCT SEER ON eal REGION TOTAL PUBLIC OWNERSHIP PRIVATE OWNERSHIP
|
||
vast majority of timberlands are privately owned. uchanan Count 169.306
|
||
uchanan Coun 7 A
|
||
Products created by Cumberland Plateau’s y Buchanan County 294,995 6138 288,417
|
||
roundwood timber include bioenergy, pulpwood, and_ Dickenson County 13,364 493,054 Dickenson County 195,999 17,261 178,738
|
||
saw logs. The Cumberland Plateau had two mills Russell County 1,191 44,184 Russell County 147,344 11,360 135,984
|
||
listed in the 2019 survey, one in Buchanan County Tazewell County nee 486,422 Tazewell County 224,629 2.939 201,690
|
||
and the other in Tazewell County, both producing
|
||
saw logs. Cumberland Plateau 32,332 1,192,966 Cumberland Plateau 862,527 37,698 824,829
|
||
TOTAL VOLUME OF TIMBER PRODUCT 300,000 TOTAL AREA OF TIMBERLAND
|
||
15,000 (1000 Cubic Feet) , (Acres)
|
||
250,000
|
||
12,000
|
||
200,000
|
||
9,000
|
||
150,000
|
||
6,000
|
||
100,000 Va = ~t Ss
|
||
3,000 oO a — Ov eS ys
|
||
) = — 50,000 [NI Ww Ro Nt
|
||
oD Oo oO i N
|
||
— ff fn SS ie Eee Es
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
Source: USDA Forest Service Buchanan County Dickenson County Russell County Tazewell County Buchanan County Dickenson County Russell County Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
98
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
99
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Infrastructure Assessment – Natural Resources
|
||
Coal Production
|
||
|
||
With 34 mines within the region, Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau has two-thirds of the state’s mines and 84%
|
||
|
||
of the state’s total production. While operations are
|
||
|
||
spread throughout the region, over half of the total
|
||
|
||
production occurs in Buchanan County’s 8
|
||
|
||
underground and 10 surface mines. Dickenson
|
||
|
||
County rounds out much of the remaining
|
||
|
||
production, making those two regions the most
|
||
|
||
vulnerable to market movements away from coal.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health
|
||
|
||
Administration Form 7000-2, ‘Quarterly Mine Employment and Coal
|
||
|
||
Production Report.’
|
||
|
||
NUMBER OF MINES TOTAL PRODUCTION
|
||
|
||
COAL PRODUCTION AND NUMBER OF MINES BY STATE, COUNTY, AND MINE TYPE 2019
|
||
|
||
(Thousand Short Tons)
|
||
|
||
UNDERGROUND SURFACE TOTAL
|
||
|
||
Mines Production Mines Production Mines Production
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau 15 8,056 19 2,333 34 10,388
|
||
|
||
Buchanan 8 5,600 10 1,007 18 6,606
|
||
|
||
Dickenson 6 2,455 3 1,058 9 3,513
|
||
|
||
Russell - - 3 46 3 46
|
||
|
||
Tazewell 1 1 3 222 4 223
|
||
|
||
U.S. Total 226 267,373 432 438,445 669 706,309
|
||
|
||
Virginia 20 8,716 33 3,582 53 12,297
|
||
|
||
(Thousand Short Tons)
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Infrastructure Assessment — Natural Resources
|
||
|
||
Coal Production
|
||
|
||
With 34 mines within the region, Cumberland
|
||
Plateau has two-thirds of the state’s mines and 84%
|
||
of the state’s total production. While operations are
|
||
spread throughout the region, over half of the total
|
||
production occurs in Buchanan County’s 8
|
||
|
||
underground and 10 surface mines. Dickenson
|
||
County rounds out much of the remaining
|
||
|
||
production, making those two regions the most
|
||
vulnerable to market movements away from coal.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health
|
||
Administration Form 7000-2, ‘Quarterly Mine Employment and Coal
|
||
Production Report.’
|
||
|
||
20
|
||
|
||
15
|
||
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
NUMBER OF MINES
|
||
|
||
18
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
|
||
>
|
||
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
|
||
umberland Plateau
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
Russell
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
|
||
U.S. Total
|
||
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Russell
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
|
||
99
|
||
|
||
UNDERGROUND
|
||
|
||
Mines
|
||
|
||
8,000
|
||
|
||
7,000
|
||
|
||
6,000
|
||
|
||
5,000
|
||
|
||
4,000
|
||
|
||
3,000
|
||
|
||
2,000
|
||
|
||
1,000
|
||
|
||
267,373
|
||
8,716
|
||
|
||
Production
|
||
|
||
TOTAL PRODUCTION
|
||
|
||
(Thousand Short Tons)
|
||
|
||
6,606
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
|
||
Russell
|
||
|
||
SURFACE
|
||
|
||
Production
|
||
|
||
COAL PRODUCTION AND NUMBER OF MINES BY STATE, COUNTY, AND MINE TYPE 2019 (thousand Short Tons)
|
||
|
||
Production
|
||
|
||
10,388
|
||
1,007 18 6,606
|
||
1,058 &) Sil)
|
||
46 3 46
|
||
222 4 223
|
||
438,445 669 706,309
|
||
|
||
3,582 12,297
|
||
|
||
|223
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
100
|
||
|
||
2.6.1 Labor Market
|
||
Workforce Demographics – Basic
|
||
|
||
Demographic Characteristics
|
||
• The region has only seen around 3.4% of
|
||
|
||
total population growth over the last ten
|
||
|
||
years (the United States grew 7.6% in that
|
||
|
||
same period of time). The area’s
|
||
|
||
population from 2020 to 2025 is projected
|
||
|
||
to decline slightly.
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau has a larger group
|
||
|
||
of workers in prime working years (40-64).
|
||
|
||
Likewise, the composition of younger
|
||
|
||
generations (up to 39 years) is well below
|
||
|
||
the U.S. average (41.1% vs. 48.8%).
|
||
|
||
• 68% of households are families, which is
|
||
|
||
slightly higher than the U.S. average.
|
||
|
||
• The population of Tazewell County is about
|
||
|
||
38% of the entire Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
region.
|
||
|
||
UNITED STATESSTATE OF VIRGINIA
|
||
BUCHANAN
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
DICKENSON
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL COUNTY,
|
||
VA
|
||
|
||
TAZEWELL
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
CUMBERLAND
|
||
PLATEAU
|
||
|
||
POPULATION SIZE AND GROWTH
|
||
2010 Total Population 308,745,538 8,001,024 24,098 15,903 28,897 45,078 113,976
|
||
2020 Total Population 333,793,107 8,684,166 25,340 16,374 31,537 44,784 118,035
|
||
2025 Total Population Projection 346,021,282 9,008,218 25,187 16,125 32,074 43,280 116,666
|
||
2010-2020 Population: Annual Growth Rate 0.76% 0.80% 0.49% 0.29% 0.86% -0.06% 0.34%
|
||
2020-2025 Population: Projected Annual
|
||
Growth Rate 0.72% 0.74% -0.12% -0.31% 0.34% -0.68% -0.23%
|
||
|
||
HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, 2020
|
||
Total Households 126,083,849 3,306,451 10,695 6,733 13,154 18,455 49,037
|
||
Total Family Households 82,747,156 2,187,607 7,263 4,614 9,108 12,561 33,546
|
||
Average Family Size 3.16 3.09 2.77 2.86 2.85 2.83 2.82
|
||
|
||
AGE OF RESIDENTS, 2020
|
||
19 and Younger 23.2% 23.0% 18.1% 20.1% 19.6% 19.1% 19.2%
|
||
20 to 39 25.6% 26.0% 22.4% 22.3% 21.4% 22.0% 21.9%
|
||
40 to 64 29.5% 30.8% 35.2% 34.4% 34.5% 33.1% 34.1%
|
||
65 to 74 9.2% 9.2% 12.7% 12.8% 12.9% 13.0% 12.9%
|
||
75 and Older 6.4% 6.1% 7.6% 7.7% 7.6% 8.4% 7.9%
|
||
|
||
RACE IDENTIFICATION 0.96
|
||
2020 White Population 231,522,079 5,667,763 24,137 16,036 30,591 42,224 112,988
|
||
2020 Black/African American Population 43,241,563 1,687,062 800 78 304 1,386 2,568
|
||
2020 American Indian/Alaska Native Population 3,287,423 33,483 29 31 93 97 250
|
||
2020 Asian Population 19,671,498 609,644 135 34 69 299 537
|
||
2020 Pacific Islander Population 657,766 7,727 2 0 1 7 10
|
||
2020 Other Race Population 23,546,963 349,290 42 48 194 162 446
|
||
2020 Population of Two or More Races 11,865,815 329,197 195 147 285 609 1,236
|
||
2020 Hispanic Population 62,637,732 880,213 197 178 425 505 1,305
|
||
|
||
BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
2.6.) Labor Market
|
||
|
||
Workforce Demographics — Basic
|
||
Demographic Characteristics
|
||
|
||
e The region has only seen around 3.4% of BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
|
||
F BUCHANAN DICKENSON RUSSELL COUNTY, TAZEWELL
|
||
total population growth over the last ten UNITED STATESSTATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY, a COUNTY, VA i COUNTY, VA
|
||
years (the United States grew 7.6% in that POPULATION SIZE AND GROWTH
|
||
same period of time). The area’s 2010 Total Population 308,745,538 8,001,024 24,098 15,903 28,897 45,078 113,976
|
||
; ; . 2020 Total Population 333,793,107 8,684,166 25,340 16,374 31,537 44,784 118,035
|
||
population from 2020 to 2025 is projected 2025 Total Population Projection 346,021,282 9,008,218 25,187 16,125 32,074 43,280 116,666
|
||
to decline slightly. 2010-2020 Population: Annual Growth Rate 0.76% 0.80% 0.49% 0.29% 0.86% -0.06% 0.34%
|
||
2020-2025 Population: Projected Annual
|
||
e The Cumberland Plateau has a larger group Growth Rate 0.72% 0.74% -0.12% -0.31% 0.34% -0.68% -0.23%
|
||
of workers in prime working years (40-64). HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, 2020
|
||
Likewise, the composition of younger Total Households 126,083,849 3,306,451 10,695 6,733 13,154 18,455 49,037
|
||
Total Family Households 82,747,156 2,187,607 7,263 4,614 9,108 12,561 33,546
|
||
|
||
generations (up to 39 years) is well below
|
||
the U.S. average (41.1% vs. 48.8%).
|
||
|
||
Average Family Size 3.16 3.09 2.77 2.86 2.85 2.83 2.82
|
||
|
||
AGE OF RESIDENTS, 2020
|
||
|
||
° 68% of households are families, which is 19 and Younger 23.2% 23.0% 18.1% 20.1% 19.6% 19.1% 19.2%
|
||
slightly higher than the U.S. average. 20 to 39 25.6% 26.0% 22.4% 22.3% 21.4% 22.0% 21.9%
|
||
40 to 64 29.5% 30.8% 35.2% 34.4% 34.5% 33.1% 34.1%
|
||
|
||
e The population of Tazewell County is about 65 to 74 9.2% 9.2% 12.7% 12.8% 12.9% 13.0% 12.9%
|
||
38% of the entire Cumberland Plateau ee aa 6.1% 76% 10% 70% oa —
|
||
region. RACE IDENTIFICATION 0.96
|
||
2020 White Population 231,522,079 5,667,763 24,137 16,036 30,591 42,224 112,988
|
||
|
||
2020 Black/African American Population 43,241,563 1,687,062 800 78 304 1,386 2,568
|
||
|
||
2020 American Indian/Alaska Native Population 3,287,423 33,483 29 31 93 97 250
|
||
|
||
2020 Asian Population 19,671,498 609,644 135 34 69 299 537
|
||
|
||
2020 Pacific Islander Population 657,766 7,727 2 0 1 7 10
|
||
|
||
2020 Other Race Population 23,546,963 349,290 42 48 194 162 446
|
||
|
||
2020 Population of Two or More Races 11,865,815 329,197 195 147 285 609 1,236
|
||
|
||
2020 Hispanic Population 62,637,732 880,213 197 178 425 505 1,305
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
100
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
101
|
||
|
||
2.6.2 Labor Market
|
||
Workforce Demographics – Wealth
|
||
|
||
Characteristics
|
||
• Labor costs are very low in the Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau. The median household income is
|
||
|
||
over 40% lower than the U.S. average.
|
||
|
||
• Persons at or below the poverty level are
|
||
|
||
higher than the U.S. average (12.2% vs.
|
||
|
||
7.4%). As a result, the rate of households
|
||
|
||
receiving food stamps is high in the region
|
||
|
||
– particularly in Dickenson and Buchanan
|
||
|
||
counties.
|
||
|
||
• The median home value is very low in the
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau – 62% lower than the
|
||
|
||
U.S. average. Rental rates are low as well.
|
||
|
||
• The rate of homeownership is well above
|
||
|
||
the U.S. average.
|
||
|
||
UNITED STATESSTATE OF VIRGINIA
|
||
BUCHANAN
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
DICKENSON
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL COUNTY,
|
||
VA
|
||
|
||
TAZEWELL
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
CUMBERLAND
|
||
PLATEAU
|
||
|
||
HOUSEHOLD WEALTH AND INCOME
|
||
|
||
2020 Total Households 126,083,849 3,306,451 10,695 6,733 13,154 18,455 49,037
|
||
|
||
2020 Median Household Income $62,203 $73,543 $30,848 $32,956 $38,312 $39,147 $36,634
|
||
|
||
2020 Median Disposable Income $51,505 $57,487 $26,209 $27,770 $31,982 $32,870 $30,466
|
||
|
||
Disposable Income as a percentage of MHHI 82.8% 78.2% 85.0% 84.3% 83.5% 84.0% 83.2%
|
||
|
||
Median Net Worth $96,701 $127,472 $40,086 $44,585 $52,545 $72,223 $54,715
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC STRESS INDICATORS
|
||
|
||
Persons at or Below Poverty Level 7.4% 5.5% 16.7% 14.0% 11.7% 9.6% 12.2%
|
||
|
||
Households Receiving Food Stamps/SNAP 11.7% 8.2% 19.7% 21.5% 14.9% 16.3% 17.4%
|
||
|
||
No Vehicle 15.5% 15.4% 14.3% 13.4% 12.7% 24.4% 16.9%
|
||
|
||
HOUSING VALUES AND COSTS
|
||
|
||
2020 Total Housing Units 142,148,018 3,643,841 12,373 7,706 15,041 21,426 56,546
|
||
|
||
2020 Median Home Value $235,127 $285,102 $78,496 $76,581 $103,025 $94,340 $90,212
|
||
|
||
2020 Average Home Value $328,824 $363,579 $128,749 $98,576 $142,441 $130,245 $128,958
|
||
|
||
Percent of Homes Occupied by Owner 56.4% 59.6% 68.8% 67.0% 69.0% 67.5% 68.1%
|
||
2019 Median Gross Rent (HHs Paying Cash
|
||
Rent) $1,062 $1,234 $617 $592 $582 $656 $621
|
||
|
||
WEALTH CHARACTERISTICS
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
2.6.2 Labor Market
|
||
|
||
Workforce Demographics — Wealth
|
||
|
||
Characteristics
|
||
e Labor costs are very low in the Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau. The median household income is
|
||
over 40% lower than the U.S. average.
|
||
|
||
e Persons at or below the poverty level are
|
||
higher than the U.S. average (12.2% vs.
|
||
7.4%). As a result, the rate of households
|
||
receiving food stamps is high in the region
|
||
— particularly in Dickenson and Buchanan
|
||
counties.
|
||
|
||
e The median home value is very low in the
|
||
Cumberland Plateau — 62% lower than the
|
||
U.S. average. Rental rates are low as well.
|
||
|
||
e The rate of homeownership is well above
|
||
the U.S. average.
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
WEALTH CHARACTERISTICS
|
||
|
||
[ tarasinereor won Son SR TN
|
||
HOUSEHOLD WEALTH AND INCOME
|
||
2020 Total Households 126,083,849 3,306,451 10,695 6,733 13,154 18,455 49,037
|
||
2020 Median Household Income $62,203 $73,543 $30,848 $32,956 $38,312 $39,147 $36,634
|
||
2020 Median Disposable Income $51,505 $57,487 $26,209 $27,770 $31,982 $32,870 $30,466
|
||
Disposable Income as a percentage of MHHI 82.8% 78.2% 85.0% 84.3% 83.5% 84.0% 83.2%
|
||
Median Net Worth $96,701 $127,472 $40,086 $44,585 $52,545 $72,223 $54,715
|
||
ECONOMIC STRESS INDICATORS
|
||
Persons at or Below Poverty Level 74% 5.5% 16.7% 14.0% 11.7% 9.6% 12.2%
|
||
Households Receiving Food Stamps/SNAP 11.7% 8.2% 19.7% 21.5% 14.9% 16.3% 17.4%
|
||
No Vehicle 15.5% 15.4% 14.3% 13.4% 12.7% 24.4% 16.9%
|
||
HOUSING VALUES AND COSTS
|
||
2020 Total Housing Units 142,148,018 3,643,841 12,373 7,706 15,041 21,426 56,546
|
||
2020 Median Home Value $235,127 $285,102 $78,496 $76,581 $103,025 $94,340 $90,212
|
||
2020 Average Home Value $328,824 $363,579 $128,749 $98,576 $142,441 $130,245 $128,958
|
||
Percent of Homes Occupied by Owner 56.4% 59.6% 68.8% 67.0% 69.0% 67.5% 68.1%
|
||
2019 Median Gross Rent (HHs Paying Cash
|
||
Rent) 1,062 1,234 617 592 582 656 621
|
||
|
||
101
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
102
|
||
|
||
2.6.3 Labor Market
|
||
Workforce Demographics – Labor
|
||
|
||
Force Characteristics
|
||
• The region’s low population growth is
|
||
|
||
evidenced by the small labor pool of
|
||
|
||
37,623. Tazewell County has the largest
|
||
|
||
labor force, nearly doubling the runner-up
|
||
|
||
Russell County.
|
||
|
||
• Cumberland Plateau’s unemployment rate
|
||
|
||
is higher than both the national average
|
||
|
||
and that of Virginia, with Buchanan County
|
||
|
||
experiencing the rate of 7.2%.
|
||
|
||
• Despite the strong broadband capabilities
|
||
|
||
within the region, household technology
|
||
|
||
usage is below average. Only 71.5% of
|
||
|
||
households own a computer in the
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau (compared to the U.S.
|
||
|
||
at 76.7%), and the percentage of
|
||
|
||
households with broadband subscriptions is
|
||
|
||
22 percentage points below the U.S.
|
||
|
||
average.
|
||
|
||
UNITED STATESSTATE OF VIRGINIA
|
||
BUCHANAN
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
DICKENSON
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL COUNTY,
|
||
VA
|
||
|
||
TAZEWELL
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
CUMBERLAND
|
||
PLATEAU
|
||
|
||
SIZE AND COMPOSITION OF LABOR FORCE
|
||
|
||
2020 Estimated Labor Force 163,555,585 4,356,868 6,903 4,575 9,935 16,210 37,623
|
||
|
||
2020 Employed Civilian Population Age 16+ 154,842,185 4,156,018 6,405 4,352 9,296 15,160 35,213
|
||
|
||
Employed Population Male 81,305,624 2,146,081 3,511 2,253 4,874 8,466 19,104
|
||
|
||
% of Employed Population 52.5% 51.6% 54.8% 51.8% 52.4% 55.8% 54.3%
|
||
|
||
Employed Population Female 73,536,561 2,009,937 2,894 2,099 4,422 6,694 16,109
|
||
|
||
% of Employed Population 47.5% 48.4% 45.2% 48.2% 47.6% 44.2% 45.7%
|
||
|
||
UNEMPLOYMENT
|
||
|
||
2019 Unemployment Rate 5.3% 4.6% 7.2% 4.9% 6.4% 6.5% 6.4%
|
||
2020 Average Commute Time to Employment in
|
||
Minutes 26.9 28.7 27.3 27.8 28.0 25.1 26.6
|
||
|
||
ADDITIONAL LABOR FORCE
|
||
CHARACTERISTICS
|
||
|
||
2019 Civilian Population 18+: Veteran 18,230,322 677,533 806 925 1,268 2,429 5,428
|
||
2019 Persons with a disability 65 years and
|
||
younger 8.6% 8.0% 20.3% 21.5% 20.6% 16.0% 18.8%
|
||
|
||
2019 Households with a computer 76.7% 81.2% 72.7% 68.1% 74.7% 70.1% 71.5%
|
||
|
||
2019 Households with a broadband subscription 68.9% 70.0% 47.0% 37.8% 39.4% 55.0% 46.9%
|
||
|
||
LABOR FORCE CHARACTERISTICS
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
2.6.3 Labor Market
|
||
|
||
Workforce Demographics — Labor
|
||
|
||
Force Characteristics
|
||
e The region’s low population growth is
|
||
|
||
LABOR FORCE CHARACTERISTICS
|
||
|
||
F BUCHANAN DICKENSON RUSSELL COUNTY, TAZEWELL CUMBERLAND
|
||
evidenced by the small labor pool of UNITED STATESSTATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY, a COUNTY, VA i COUNTY, VA PLATEAU
|
||
37,623. Tazewell County has the largest SIZE AND COMPOSITION OF LABOR FORCE
|
||
labor force, nearly doubling the runner-up 2020 Estimated Labor Force 163,555,585 4,356,868 6,903 4,575 9,935 16,210 37,623
|
||
|
||
2020 Employed Civilian Population Age 16+ 154,842,185 4,156,018 6,405 4,352 9,296 15,160 35,213
|
||
Russell County. Employed Population Male 81,305,624 2,146,081 3,511 2,253 4,874 8,466 19,104
|
||
e Cumberland Plateau’s unemployment rate % of Employed Population 52.5% 51.6% 54.8% 51.8% 52.4% 55.8% 54.3%
|
||
woe . Employed Population Female 73,536,561 2,009,937 2,894 2,099 4,422 6,694 16,109
|
||
Is higher than both the national average % of Employed Population 47.5% 48.4% 45.2% 48.2% 47.6% 44.2% 45.7%
|
||
and that of Virginia, with Buchanan County
|
||
experiencing the rate of 7.2%. UNEMPLOYMENT
|
||
; oo 2019 Unemployment Rate 5.3% 4.6% 7.2% 4.9% 6.4% 6.5% 6.4%
|
||
e Despite the strong broadband capabilities 2020 Average Commute Time to Employment in
|
||
within the region, household technology Minutes 26.9 28.7 27.3 27.8 28.0 25.1 26.6
|
||
usage is below average. Only 71.5% of ADDITIONAL LABOR FORCE
|
||
households own a computer in the a on ion Popul tion 18+: Vet 18,230,322 677,533 806 925 1,268 2,429 5,428
|
||
Ivillan Population 16+: Veteran Fi I, 7 ’ ,
|
||
Cumberland Plateau (compared to the U.S. 2019 Persons with a disability 65 years and
|
||
at 76.7%), and the percentage of younger 8.6% 8.0% 20.3% 21.5% 20.6% 16.0% 18.8%
|
||
households with broadband subscriptions is 2019 Households with a computer 76.7% 81.2% 72.1% 68.1% 74.7% 70.1% 71.5%
|
||
p 2019 Households with a broadband subscription 68.9% 70.0% 47.0% 37.8% 39.4% 55.0% 46.9%
|
||
|
||
22 percentage points below the U.S.
|
||
average.
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
102
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
103
|
||
|
||
2.6.4 Labor Market
|
||
Workforce Demographics – Labor
|
||
|
||
Force Participation Rate
|
||
• Labor force participation is very low in the
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau, as shown by the
|
||
|
||
orange line below. The region’s labor force
|
||
|
||
participation rate is more than 20% lower
|
||
|
||
than the U.S. average (42.9% vs. 63.4%).
|
||
|
||
• The labor force participation rate is closely
|
||
|
||
tied to the demographic makeup of each
|
||
|
||
county. Tazewell County has the highest
|
||
|
||
participation within the region, whereas
|
||
|
||
Buchanan and Dickenson are nearly equal
|
||
|
||
at the bottom with an almost 10% gap from
|
||
|
||
Tazewell and nearly 30% from the state
|
||
|
||
overall.
|
||
|
||
• Virginia’s labor force participation rate is
|
||
|
||
higher across all groups than the U.S.
|
||
|
||
average, indicating a strong labor pool in
|
||
|
||
areas near the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• At only 38.6%, the labor force participation
|
||
|
||
rate is especially low for the female
|
||
|
||
population.
|
||
|
||
UNITED STATESSTATE OF VIRGINIA
|
||
BUCHANAN
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
DICKENSON
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL COUNTY,
|
||
VA
|
||
|
||
TAZEWELL
|
||
COUNTY, VA
|
||
|
||
CUMBERLAND
|
||
PLATEAU
|
||
|
||
2019 Labor Force Participation Rate 63.4% 65.9% 37.6% 37.5% 43.9% 47.0% 42.9%
|
||
|
||
2019 Female Labor Force Participation Rate 58.5% 61.1% 33.3% 35.7% 39.7% 41.7% 38.6%
|
||
|
||
2019 Male Labor Force Participation Rate 67.1% 69.0% 39.7% 37.5% 45.9% 51.2% 45.4%
|
||
|
||
LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
2019 LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE
|
||
|
||
2.6.4 Labor Market
|
||
|
||
Workforce Demographics — Labor
|
||
|
||
Force Participation Rate
|
||
e Labor force participation is very low in the LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE
|
||
|
||
BUCHANAN DICKENSON RUSSELL COUNTY, TAZEWELL. CUMBERLAND]
|
||
Cumberland Plateau, as shown by the UNITED STATESSTATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY, “4 COUNTY, VA vA COUNTY, VA arent
|
||
orange line below. The region’s labor force 2019 Labor Force Participation Rate 63.4% 65.9% 37.6% 37.5% 43.9% 47.0% 42.9%
|
||
participation rate is more than 20% lower 2019 Female Labor Force Participation Rate 58.5% 61.1% 33.3% 35.7% 39.7% 41.7% 38.6%
|
||
than the U.S. average (42.9% vs. 63.4%) 2019 Male Labor Force Participation Rate 67.1% 69.0% 39.7% 37.5% 45.9% 51.2% 45.4%
|
||
e The labor force participation rate is closely
|
||
county. Tazewell County has the highest 0.8
|
||
|
||
participation within the region, whereas
|
||
Buchanan and Dickenson are nearly equal
|
||
|
||
0.7
|
||
at the bottom with an almost 10% gap from 06 — zz
|
||
Tazewell and nearly 30% from the state 63% ~
|
||
overall. 0.5
|
||
. ae ; Cumberland Plateau 43%
|
||
e Virginia’s labor force participation rate is 0.4 47%
|
||
higher across all groups than the U.S.
|
||
average, indicating a strong labor pool in 0.3
|
||
areas near the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
e At only 38.6%, the labor force participation 02
|
||
rate is especially low for the female 0.1 —
|
||
population.
|
||
0.0 H1_ — L ! Hl
|
||
|
||
United State of Buchanan Dickenson Russell Tazewell
|
||
States Virginia County County County County
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Communit ity Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
103
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
104
|
||
|
||
2.6.5 Labor Market
|
||
Educational Characteristics -
|
||
|
||
Attainment
|
||
• At a rate less than half that of the national average and
|
||
|
||
one-third of the state average, the supply of university
|
||
|
||
graduates is relatively low in the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
region.
|
||
|
||
• The supply of graduates from 2-year colleges is slightly
|
||
|
||
above average.
|
||
|
||
• The number of people in the region with less than a
|
||
|
||
high school degree is almost twice the U.S. average,
|
||
|
||
indicating this should be a focal area for economic
|
||
|
||
development efforts.
|
||
|
||
HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (AGES 25+)
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Community Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
Less than high school diploma
|
||
|
||
High school diploma, GED, or some college (no degree)
|
||
|
||
Associates Degree
|
||
|
||
Bachelor’s Degree
|
||
|
||
Advanced Degree
|
||
|
||
2.6.5 Labor Market
|
||
|
||
Educational Characteristics -
|
||
|
||
Attainment
|
||
e Ata rate less than half that of the national average and
|
||
|
||
one-third of the state average, the supply of university
|
||
graduates is relatively low in the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
region.
|
||
|
||
e The supply of graduates from 2-year colleges is slightly
|
||
above average.
|
||
|
||
e The number of people in the region with less than a
|
||
high school degree is almost twice the U.S. average,
|
||
indicating this should be a focal area for economic
|
||
development efforts.
|
||
|
||
®@ Less than high school diploma
|
||
|
||
@ High school diploma, GED, or some college (no degree)
|
||
@ Associates Degree
|
||
|
||
@ Bachelor's Degree
|
||
|
||
@ Advanced Degree
|
||
|
||
Source: US Census; American Communit ity Survey, EASI Analytics
|
||
|
||
HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (AGES 25+)
|
||
|
||
12.9% TM 17.4%
|
||
|
||
22.9%
|
||
|
||
7.8%
|
||
|
||
9.9%
|
||
|
||
USA VA
|
||
|
||
104
|
||
|
||
4.4%
|
||
7.2%
|
||
|
||
0%
|
||
|
||
53.8%
|
||
|
||
28.1%
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Russel
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Cumberland
|
||
Plateau
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
105
|
||
|
||
2.7.1 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Cumberland Plateau – Industrial Parks - Select Parks Highlight on Following Pages
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Openstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services
|
||
|
||
1 Buchanan Information Park
|
||
|
||
Southern Gap Business Park
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County Technology Park
|
||
|
||
Red Onion Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Russell County Industrial Complex
|
||
|
||
Russell County Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Russell Regional Business & Technology Park
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau Regional Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Wardell Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Bluestone Regional Business & Technology Park
|
||
|
||
Bluefield Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
3
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
|
||
8
|
||
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
11
|
||
|
||
2.7.\ Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau — Industrial Parks - Select Parks Highlight on Following Pages
|
||
|
||
Freeh, Whamoliffe
|
||
|
||
[Hurley
|
||
|
||
Mousie
|
||
|
||
McDowell County
|
||
|
||
Bradshaw,
|
||
|
||
Ged
|
||
|
||
Gamer Knott County
|
||
|
||
NM Pippa Passes wi
|
||
|
||
160
|
||
|
||
Belcher
|
||
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
Elkhom City’
|
||
|
||
/Buchanan\County,
|
||
Harman}
|
||
|
||
[Dickenson\Countyj
|
||
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
‘
|
||
|
||
*Saltville
|
||
|
||
Broadford
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
.,
|
||
|
||
Brumley Gap
|
||
|
||
Adwolf
|
||
|
||
ickelsville
|
||
71.
|
||
|
||
Washington County,
|
||
|
||
7 | oe
|
||
i Figyd County mA ee McVeigh Majestic
|
||
E itt Cor {Coal Run Village! a
|
||
[Breathitt z lage = thee helps 7
|
||
ea mackey 2 Pike County ae
|
||
80} Wayland 194
|
||
|
||
yth County
|
||
Lat
|
||
|
||
McMullin
|
||
|
||
ey
|
||
|
||
a rte
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
Ss
|
||
|
||
16
|
||
| “
|
||
a
|
||
|
||
3]
|
||
|
||
%
|
||
|
||
:
|
||
$
|
||
:
|
||
fr
|
||
!
|
||
|
||
don ee
|
||
|
||
:
|
||
p)
|
||
10} —afista
|
||
|
||
Ke
|
||
|
||
met
|
||
Crumpler. > Matoaka
|
||
|
||
ud
|
||
nn
|
||
|
||
Mercer County.
|
||
Maybeury Princeton
|
||
\ Montcalm {|
|
||
‘Bramwell
|
||
Pocahontas LE |
|
||
|
||
Giles-€
|
||
598
|
||
|
||
Bastian
|
||
|
||
Cripple Creek
|
||
|
||
id
|
||
|
||
Grove Carroll .Gou
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Qpenstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services
|
||
|
||
105
|
||
|
||
Buchanan Information Park
|
||
|
||
Southern Gap Business Park
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County Technology Park
|
||
|
||
Red Onion Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Russell County Industrial Complex
|
||
|
||
Russell County Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Russell Regional Business & Technology Park
|
||
Cumberland Plateau Regional Industrial Park
|
||
Wardell Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Bluestone Regional Business & Technology Park
|
||
Bluefield Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
106
|
||
|
||
2.7.2 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Southern Gap Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants
|
||
VEC (Call Center), Paul’s Fan Company, Southern Gap Outdoor Adventure, Southern Gap
|
||
Transportation and Logistics Center
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Buchanan County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
Flat grading within the developable acres; fiber recently added to site; incoming and outgoing
|
||
traffic may be an issue
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
BUCHANAN NONE REQUIRED 3,000 1,100
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
40
|
||
66 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power;
|
||
substation and
|
||
|
||
transmission lines offsite
|
||
Virginia Natural Gas
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County PSA;
|
||
600,000 gpd available
|
||
|
||
capacity; 14” line
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County PSA;
|
||
1,000,000 gpd available
|
||
|
||
capacity
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
2 ▶︎ SOUTHERN GAP INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
2.7.2 \nfrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
Southern Gap Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
=] SOUTHERN GAP INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
VEC (Call Center), Paul’s Fan Company, Southern Gap Outdoor Adventure, Southern Gap
|
||
Current Tenants : a.
|
||
Transportation and Logistics Center
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Buchanan County
|
||
|
||
Flat grading within the developable acres; fiber recently added to site; incoming and outgoing
|
||
Other : .
|
||
traffic may be an issue
|
||
|
||
>] GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
HS DS 3) ff
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING
|
||
|
||
TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
BUCHANAN NONE REQUIRED 3,000 1,100
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
40 66 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
> UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
@ @ 6 6
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
Appalachian Power; Buchanan County PSA; — Buchanan County PSA;
|
||
substation and Virginia Natural Gas 600,000 gpd available 1,000,000 gpd available
|
||
transmission lines offsite capacity; 14” line capacity
|
||
|
||
106
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
107
|
||
|
||
2.7.3 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Dickenson County Technology Park
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants Serco, SAIC
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Dickenson County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
DICKENSON INDUSTRIAL 11.93 2
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
80 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power Appalachian Natural Gas
|
||
Town of Clintwood;
|
||
|
||
800,000 gpd available
|
||
capacity; 12” line
|
||
|
||
Town of Clintwood;
|
||
500,000 gpd available
|
||
|
||
capacity
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
3 ▶︎ DICKENSON COUNTY TECHNOLOGY PARK
|
||
|
||
2.7.3 \Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
Dickenson County Technology Park
|
||
|
||
3) =| DICKENSON COUNTY TECHNOLOGY PARK
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants: Serco, SAIC
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Dickenson County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
>] GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
HS DS 3) Lo
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
DICKENSON INDUSTRIAL 11.93 2
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
2 80 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
> UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
© @ 6 6
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
Town of Clintwood; Town of Clintwood;
|
||
Appalachian Power Appalachian NaturalGas 800,000 gpd available 500,000 gpd available
|
||
capacity; 12” line capacity
|
||
|
||
107
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
108
|
||
|
||
2.7.4 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Red Onion Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants None
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Dickenson County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
DICKENSON INDUSTRIAL 107.23 34.62
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
12
|
||
83 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Utility Project in Process -
|
||
American Electric Power
|
||
|
||
Utility Project in Process -
|
||
Appalachian Natural Gas
|
||
|
||
Utility Project in Process -
|
||
Town of Clintwood
|
||
|
||
Utility Project in Process -
|
||
Dickenson County Public
|
||
|
||
Service Authority
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
4 ▶︎ RED ONION INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
Red Onion Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
RED ONION INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants None
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Dickenson County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
RA
|
||
“Nx Lt
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
DICKENSON INDUSTRIAL 107.23 34.62
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
12 83 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
UTILITIES
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Utility Project in Process -
|
||
Dickenson County Public
|
||
Service Authority
|
||
|
||
Utility Project in Process - Utility Project in Process - Utility Project in Process -
|
||
American Electric Power Appalachian Natural Gas Town of Clintwood
|
||
|
||
108
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
109
|
||
|
||
2.7.5 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Russell County Industrial Complex
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants None
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
Currently in development, with bids in place to begin building pads on site; minimum of three
|
||
500,000 SF pads; permit in place for 30,000 SF greenhouse operational 2022
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL NONE REQUIRED 232 128
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
128
|
||
57 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power; 480V
|
||
3 Phase
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Natural Gas;
|
||
4” line; 55 psi
|
||
|
||
Russell County PSA; 8”
|
||
line
|
||
|
||
Russell County PSA; 8”
|
||
line
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
5 ▶︎ RUSSELL COUNTY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
|
||
|
||
2.7.5 Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
Russell County Industrial Complex
|
||
|
||
=] RUSSELL COUNTY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants None
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Currently in development, with bids in place to begin building pads on site; minimum of three
|
||
500,000 SF pads; permit in place for 30,000 SF greenhouse operational 2022
|
||
|
||
>] GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
HS DS 3) Lo
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
RUSSELL NONE REQUIRED 232 128
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
57 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
|
||
128 Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
> UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
© @ 6 6
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power; 480V Appalachian Natural Gas; Russell County PSA; 8” _—Russell County PSA; 8”
|
||
3 Phase 4” line; 55 psi line line
|
||
|
||
109
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
110
|
||
|
||
2.7.6 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Russell County Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants
|
||
Jennmar; Virginia State Police Investigation Office; 3B Consultants; G&R Gas Company;
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL M-1 60 4.5
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
4.5
|
||
50 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power Appalachian Natural Gas
|
||
Town of Lebanon;
|
||
|
||
650,000 gpd available
|
||
capacity; 8” line
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon;
|
||
400,000 gpd available
|
||
|
||
capacity
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
6 ▶︎ RUSSELL COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
2.7.6 \Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
Russell County Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
»] RUSSELL COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
Jennmar; Virginia State Police Investigation Office; 3B Consultants; G&R Gas Company;
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
>] GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
HS DS Lo
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
RUSSELL M-1 60 4.5
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
50 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
|
||
4.5 Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
» UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
© @ 6 6
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon; Town of Lebanon;
|
||
Appalachian Power Appalachian Natural Gas 650,000 gpd available 400,000 gpd available
|
||
capacity; 8” line capacity
|
||
|
||
110
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
111
|
||
|
||
2.7.7 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Russell Regional Business &
|
||
|
||
Technology Park
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants Northrop Grumman; CGI
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL M-1 113 8.9
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
8.9
|
||
52 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power
|
||
Company; 3 MW on site
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Natural Gas Town of Lebanon Town of Lebanon
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
7 ▶︎ RUSSELL REGIONAL BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY PARK
|
||
|
||
2.7.7 \Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
|
||
Russell Regional Business &
|
||
|
||
Technology Park
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants Northrop Grumman; CGI
|
||
|
||
=] RUSSELL REGIONAL BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY PARK
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
>] GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
HS DS
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING
|
||
RUSSELL M-1
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
52 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
|
||
8.9 Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
3)
|
||
|
||
TOTAL ACRES
|
||
|
||
113
|
||
|
||
TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
8.9
|
||
|
||
> UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
© @
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power
|
||
|
||
Company; 3 MW on site Appalachian Natural Gas
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
WATER
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
SEWER
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
112
|
||
|
||
2.7.8 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Cumberland Plateau Regional
|
||
|
||
Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants AT&T; Samuel Pressure Vessel Group; Walmart; Holiday Inn Express
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL M-1 142
|
||
Four Tracts: 8.579 acres;
|
||
7.227 acres; 1.341 acres;
|
||
|
||
2.493 acres
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
8
|
||
50 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power
|
||
Company
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Natural Gas;
|
||
4" line
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon;
|
||
700,000 gpd available
|
||
|
||
capacity; 8” line
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon;
|
||
550,000 gpd available
|
||
|
||
capacity; 8” line
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
8 ▶︎ CUMBERLAND PLATEAU REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
2.7.8 Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
Cumberland Plateau Regional
|
||
Industrial Park
|
||
|
||
112
|
||
|
||
>] CUMBERLAND PLATEAU REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants AT&T; Samuel Pressure Vessel Group; Walmart; Holiday Inn Express
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Russell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
= GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
Les DS cs
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES
|
||
|
||
RUSSELL M-1 142
|
||
|
||
F ot)
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
8 50 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
(3
|
||
|
||
TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
Four Tracts: 8.579 acres;
|
||
7.227 acres; 1.341 acres;
|
||
|
||
2.493 acres
|
||
|
||
> UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
© @ 6
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power Appalachian Natural Gas;
|
||
Company 4" line
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon;
|
||
700,000 gpd available
|
||
capacity; 8” line
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
SEWER
|
||
|
||
Town of Lebanon;
|
||
550,000 gpd available
|
||
capacity; 8” line
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
113
|
||
|
||
2.7.9 Infrastructure Assessment – Industrial Parks
|
||
Bluestone Regional Business &
|
||
|
||
Technology Park
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants Bruneaux Bait
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
|
||
TAZEWELL NONE 680 180
|
||
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
30
|
||
80 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Power
|
||
Company; 3 MW on site
|
||
|
||
Gas 2 miles from site -
|
||
Cardinal Natural Gas
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County Public
|
||
Service Authority; 1,000
|
||
|
||
gpm available capacity; 8”
|
||
line
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County Public
|
||
Service Authority; 0.3
|
||
|
||
mpgd available capacity
|
||
with 2.0 mgd reserve
|
||
|
||
▶︎ UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
10 ▶︎ BLUESTONE REGIONAL BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY PARK
|
||
|
||
2.7.9 Infrastructure Assessment — Industrial Parks
|
||
|
||
Bluestone Regional Business &
|
||
Technology Park
|
||
|
||
a
|
||
ae =
|
||
|
||
113
|
||
|
||
=] BLUESTONE REGIONAL BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY PARK
|
||
|
||
Current Tenants Bruneaux Bait
|
||
|
||
Owner Industrial Development Authority of Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
>] GENERAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
HS DS cs ff
|
||
|
||
COUNTY ZONING TOTAL ACRES TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE
|
||
TAZEWELL NONE 680 180
|
||
LARGEST CONTIGUOUS PARCEL DISTANCE TO COMMERCIAL AIRPORT
|
||
|
||
80 miles (Tri-Cities
|
||
|
||
30 Regional Airport)
|
||
|
||
> UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
@ @ 6 6
|
||
|
||
ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS WATER SEWER
|
||
Tazewell County Public | Tazewell County Public
|
||
Appalachian Power Gas 2 miles from site- Service Authority; 1,000 Service Authority; 0.3
|
||
Company; 3 MW on site Cardinal NaturalGas gpm available capacity; 8” mpgd available capacity
|
||
line with 2.0 mgd reserve
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
114
|
||
|
||
2.8.1 Infrastructure Assessment – Regional Parks
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Openstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services
|
||
|
||
2.8.) Infrastructure Assessment — Regional Parks
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
i a >
|
||
| 3 Floyd County whl Ze °* McVeigh
|
||
8 mw Coal RinVillagey Phelps sour,
|
||
pereath itt County et Wreees
|
||
Handitigenackey "). Pike County ah, Day ease tan
|
||
re wi Qa nibinte W8icha Kintball .
|
||
imi
|
||
Mousie Eckman! M Coun
|
||
McDowell County ercer c
|
||
Gary 2 Brincet!
|
||
|
||
Gamer Knott Cou inty iy
|
||
|
||
Pippa Passes Wheelwright Bartley y
|
||
i
|
||
i > Cats Park: y ah, ork nicnes bin
|
||
Berwind Blues sed
|
||
Fairgrounds) Buchanan(County) Sauige Graham Recreation
|
||
|
||
Wise County, {;.
|
||
|
||
yp one
|
||
|
||
Harlan} a County
|
||
Le
|
||
|
||
CO} Stone Gap
|
||
|
||
~
|
||
|
||
@ Hidden Valley’Campground ~ oe
|
||
Dungannon o re “Cripplé ¢
|
||
|
||
AE, Brumley Gap aS oan Se NY Grok
|
||
mi A ee : carmen
|
||
J\ lickelSwille Measoysew \ .
|
||
Washington County Fs
|
||
—_— Tf win’
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Qpenstreetmaps, Hickey Global Consulting Services
|
||
|
||
114
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
115
|
||
|
||
2.8.2 Infrastructure Assessment – State Parks
|
||
Breaks Interstate Park
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, horseback riding, fishing, water park, rock climbing
|
||
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES ANNUAL VISITORS NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
1954 4,500 330,000 138
|
||
|
||
▶︎ BREAKS INTERSTATE PARK
|
||
|
||
Jointly administered by Virginia and Kentucky, Breaks Interstate Park is located
|
||
|
||
on a gap in the continuous Pine Mountain Range spanning Kentucky, Virginia,
|
||
|
||
and Tennessee. Referred to as the “Grand Canyon of the South,” the park
|
||
|
||
boasts the largest canyon east of the Mississippi. The park’s terminus is
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County.
|
||
|
||
2.8.2 Infrastructure Assessment — State Parks
|
||
Breaks Interstate Park
|
||
|
||
=| BREAKS INTERSTATE PARK
|
||
|
||
RA ( J ) )
|
||
“MN
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES ANNUAL VISITORS NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
1954 4,500 330,000 138
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, horseback riding, fishing, water park, rock climbing
|
||
|
||
Jointly administered by Virginia and Kentucky, Breaks Interstate Park is located
|
||
on a gap in the continuous Pine Mountain Range spanning Kentucky, Virginia,
|
||
and Tennessee. Referred to as the “Grand Canyon of the South,” the park
|
||
|
||
boasts the largest canyon east of the Mississippi. The park’s terminus is
|
||
Dickenson County.
|
||
|
||
115
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
116
|
||
|
||
2.8.3 Infrastructure Assessment – State Parks
|
||
Clinch River State Park
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, boat launch, fishing
|
||
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES ANNUAL VISITORS NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
2021 640
|
||
100,000
|
||
|
||
Projected
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
(Under Construction)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ CLINCH RIVER STATE PARK
|
||
|
||
Recently opened to the public as Virginia’s newest state park, the Clinch River
|
||
|
||
State Park is located in St. Paul on the border of Wise and Russell County. The
|
||
|
||
park will consist of several anchor properties connected by access points
|
||
|
||
traversable by the Clinch River, one of the most biologically diverse rivers in
|
||
|
||
North America. Currently, the Sugar Hill Unit in Wise County and the Artrip Boat
|
||
|
||
Launch in Russell County are open to visitors.
|
||
|
||
2.8.3 Infrastructure Assessment — State Parks
|
||
|
||
Clinch River State Park
|
||
|
||
Recently opened to the public as Virginia’s newest state park, the Clinch River
|
||
State Park is located in St. Paul on the border of Wise and Russell County. The
|
||
park will consist of several anchor properties connected by access points
|
||
traversable by the Clinch River, one of the most biologically diverse rivers in
|
||
North America. Currently, the Sugar Hill Unit in Wise County and the Artrip Boat
|
||
Launch in Russell County are open to visitors.
|
||
|
||
116
|
||
|
||
=] CLINCH RIVER STATE PARK
|
||
|
||
KA
|
||
“Nn
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES
|
||
|
||
2021 640
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, boat launch, fishing
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL VISITORS
|
||
|
||
100,000
|
||
Projected
|
||
|
||
NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
(Under Construction)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
117
|
||
|
||
2.8.4 Infrastructure Assessment – State Parks
|
||
Jefferson National Forest
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, fishing, hunting, skiing, horseback riding
|
||
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES ANNUAL VISITORS NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
1936 709,500 1,770,000
|
||
50
|
||
|
||
(Both Forests)
|
||
|
||
▶︎ JEFFERSON NATIONAL FOREST
|
||
|
||
Extending into Tazewell and Russell Counties, the Jefferson National Forest is combined with the George
|
||
|
||
Washington Forest to create one of the largest blocks of public land in the Eastern U.S. Of the 1.8 million acres of
|
||
|
||
land between both National Forests, 1,646,328 acres are located within Virginia. The Jefferson National Forest
|
||
|
||
portion boasts over 400 miles of designated trails and is home to 40 species of trees, 200 species of birds, and 53
|
||
|
||
federally-listed Threatened or Endangered animal and plant species, offering a wide variety of attractions for
|
||
|
||
ecotourism. 1.22% of the total percentage of land is located in Dickenson County, and 1.42% is in Tazewell
|
||
|
||
County.
|
||
|
||
2.8.4 Infrastructure Assessment — State Parks
|
||
Jefferson National Forest
|
||
|
||
=| JEFFERSON NATIONAL FOREST
|
||
|
||
KA ( J ) )
|
||
“N
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES ANNUAL VISITORS NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
50
|
||
1936 709,500 1,770,000 (Both Forests)
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, fishing, hunting, skiing, horseback riding
|
||
|
||
Extending into Tazewell and Russell Counties, the Jefferson National Forest is combined with the George
|
||
Washington Forest to create one of the largest blocks of public land in the Eastern U.S. Of the 1.8 million acres of
|
||
land between both National Forests, 1,646,328 acres are located within Virginia. The Jefferson National Forest
|
||
portion boasts over 400 miles of designated trails and is home to 40 species of trees, 200 species of birds, and 53
|
||
federally-listed Threatened or Endangered animal and plant species, offering a wide variety of attractions for
|
||
ecotourism. 1.22% of the total percentage of land is located in Dickenson County, and 1.42% is in Tazewell
|
||
County.
|
||
|
||
117
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
118
|
||
|
||
2.8.5 Infrastructure Assessment – State Parks
|
||
Channels State Forest and Natural
|
||
|
||
Area Preserve
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, fishing, hunting, horseback riding
|
||
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES ANNUAL VISITORS NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
2008 4,836 unknown 0
|
||
|
||
▶︎ CHANNELS STATE FOREST AND NATURAL AREA PRESERVE
|
||
|
||
Purchased from a private owner in 2004, the Channels State Forest is managed
|
||
|
||
by the Virginia Department of Forestry in Washington and Russell Counties.
|
||
|
||
Within the State Forest lies the Channels Natural Area Preserve, which includes
|
||
|
||
a high elevation forest, cliff communities, and a 400-million-year-old sandstone
|
||
|
||
rock outcropping known as the Great Channels of Virginia.
|
||
|
||
2.8.5 Infrastructure Assessment — State Parks
|
||
Channels State Forest and Natural
|
||
. Area Prese
|
||
|
||
=] CHANNELS STATE FOREST AND NATURAL AREA PRESERVE
|
||
|
||
RA ( J ) )
|
||
“MN
|
||
YEAR ESTABLISHED AREA ACRES ANNUAL VISITORS NUMBER OF CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
2008 4,836 unknown 0
|
||
|
||
Amenities Trails, fishing, hunting, horseback riding
|
||
|
||
Purchased from a private owner in 2004, the Channels State Forest is managed
|
||
by the Virginia Department of Forestry in Washington and Russell Counties.
|
||
Within the State Forest lies the Channels Natural Area Preserve, which includes
|
||
a high elevation forest, cliff communities, and a 400-million-year-old sandstone
|
||
rock outcropping known as the Great Channels of Virginia.
|
||
|
||
118
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
119
|
||
|
||
2.8.6 Infrastructure Assessment – Additional Parks
|
||
Cavitt’s Creek Park & Pinnacle
|
||
|
||
Natural Area Preserve
|
||
▶︎ CAVITT’S CREEK PARK
|
||
|
||
Cavitt’s Creek Park consists of a 300 recreational area centered around a 54-
|
||
|
||
acre lake. Various amenities are available for both locals and tourists, including
|
||
|
||
full-service campsites and cabins for rent, kayaks and paddle boards, and
|
||
|
||
fishing. Cavitt’s Park is also a well-received location for RV travelers.
|
||
|
||
▶︎ PINNACLE NATURAL AREA PRESERVE
|
||
|
||
Located on the confluence of the Clinch River and Big Cedar Creek, the
|
||
|
||
Pinnacle Natural Area Preserve covers 889 acres within Russell County. The
|
||
|
||
Preserve has multiple hiking trails and gets its name from a rock formation
|
||
|
||
towering 400 feet above the creek known as the Pinnacle. Big Cedar Creek Falls
|
||
|
||
is another local landmark, covering the width of the creek.
|
||
|
||
2.8.6 Infrastructure Assessment — Additional Parks
|
||
Cavitt’s Creek Park & Pinnacle
|
||
|
||
Natural Area Preserve
|
||
>] CAVITT’S CREEK PARK PINNACLE NATURAL AREA
|
||
|
||
Cavitt’s Creek Park consists of a 300 recreational area centered around a 54- Located on the confluence of the Clinch River and Big Cedar Creek, the
|
||
|
||
acre lake. Various amenities are available for both locals and tourists, including Pinnacle Natural Area Preserve covers 889 acres within Russell County. The
|
||
full-service campsites and cabins for rent, kayaks and paddle boards, and Preserve has multiple hiking trails and gets its name from a rock formation
|
||
fishing. Cavitt’s Park is also a well-received location for RV travelers. towering 400 feet above the creek known as the Pinnacle. Big Cedar Creek Falls
|
||
|
||
is another local landmark, covering the width of the creek.
|
||
|
||
119
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
120
|
||
|
||
2.9.1 Select Tourism Assets
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OpenStreetMap, Hickey Global Consulting Services, Regional County Tourism Departments
|
||
|
||
Accommodation
|
||
|
||
Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
Historical Site
|
||
|
||
Museum
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
Park
|
||
|
||
Trail
|
||
|
||
2.9.\ Select Tourism Assets
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Jartin, i vv rinevne ous ch He mt |
|
||
ae Fresbum a as ears
|
||
Floyd County ira Zebulon MeVeigh Majestic wy fe
|
||
” Pa
|
||
\Breathitt County Coal Run Village! — Phelps 16 Heindon
|
||
= kev 1441]. ) Argo’ 52 10|_«
|
||
Handige~Vackey Gite ike County wager Davy ‘Arista
|
||
7 ‘
|
||
8 Wayland Galveston E. 194 Pawihon Roderfield wad, ;
|
||
Mousia Shelbiana ® \\ Kimball Northfork Crumpler. S Mdtoaka
|
||
KY McDowell County Mercer County.
|
||
Ligon Maybeury i
|
||
Garner Knott County 122 46 Bitchy Gary ‘iiriesia Princeton,
|
||
| » J Belcher adshav Pageton
|
||
BR PippaPasses Wheelwright Virgie” e Buchanan County, 83 24
|
||
Jonancy, 4 Ingleside
|
||
80 War, 55) AL
|
||
160 ; J Harman Grundy vo Gd iles'C
|
||
Speight Dorton 197 wet &) @ pe ETG 62) paren Giles'Coun'
|
||
Jewell Valley. . 598
|
||
Ison 32) Ce. ® 14) Vansant Squire 20) Rocky,Gap
|
||
McRoberts p 41) Tiptop
|
||
63 Mavisdale Te
|
||
80514. Jewell Ridge fea
|
||
45 Miistonig ~———Nenkins 6B) cinthco mau r ie &
|
||
‘S— PayneGap aul azewell County, Bastian
|
||
etcher Letcher, Coun . ” <
|
||
nee County — ©) Dickenson county 6) 43) Gea Bland Cou
|
||
Whitesburg ee RedAsh « 19 (5) faz er
|
||
= 80 ears C6) BE (3) 19 D Burkes Garden
|
||
a 7)
|
||
z 2 29)
|
||
|
||
rammel (3)
|
||
|
||
Russell|County,
|
||
|
||
1)
|
||
}___—_Coeburn © e 6 G2
|
||
|
||
Norton County
|
||
sd ee 58 ae Gs)
|
||
|
||
‘,
|
||
.
|
||
Allison Gap
|
||
.,
|
||
Dungannon (19)
|
||
|
||
Ges) %
|
||
|
||
Emory.
|
||
lickelsville =
|
||
a Washington County (21
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OpenStreetMap, Hickey Global Consulting Services, Regional County Tourism Departments
|
||
|
||
120
|
||
|
||
52
|
||
16
|
||
32 Kent
|
||
21
|
||
Broadford
|
||
90
|
||
Rural Retreat Wythe Coun
|
||
Atkins
|
||
Smyth County
|
||
Marion ;
|
||
McMulli Cripple Creek
|
||
Adwolf
|
||
Sugar Grove Carroll County
|
||
a ~~
|
||
16] 9
|
||
oo” 21
|
||
|
||
Accommodation
|
||
Campgrounds
|
||
Historical Site
|
||
Museum
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
Park
|
||
|
||
Trail
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
121
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER Tourist Site
|
||
ACCOMMODATION
|
||
|
||
1 Comfort Inn
|
||
|
||
2 Comfort Inn & Suites
|
||
|
||
3 Cuz's Cabins & Restaurant
|
||
|
||
4 Elk Garden Methodist Bike Hostel
|
||
|
||
5 Fincastle Motor Inn
|
||
|
||
6 Holiday Inn Express & Suites Lebanon, an IHG Hotel
|
||
|
||
7 Holiday Inn Express Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
|
||
8 Real McCoy Cabins, Country Store and Kitchen
|
||
|
||
9 Sleep Inn & Suites
|
||
|
||
10 Super 8 by Wyndham Lebanon
|
||
|
||
11 Super 8 Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
|
||
12 Western Front Hotel
|
||
|
||
CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
13 Riverbend Campground
|
||
|
||
14 Southern Gap Outdoor Adventure
|
||
|
||
15 Thunder River Campground
|
||
|
||
16 Trailhead ATV Resort
|
||
|
||
HISTORICAL SITES
|
||
|
||
17 Coal Miners' Memorial
|
||
|
||
18 Ellenbrook Mansion
|
||
|
||
19 Old Russell County Court House (Robert Dickenson Home)
|
||
|
||
20 Walter McDonald Sanders House
|
||
|
||
MUSEUMS
|
||
|
||
21 Dante Coal Miners & Railroad Museum
|
||
|
||
22 Historic Crab Orchard Museum
|
||
|
||
23 Honaker Heritage Museum
|
||
|
||
24 Pocahontas Exhibition Coal Mine & Museum
|
||
|
||
25 Ralph Stanley Museum
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER Tourist Site
|
||
OTHER TOURIST SITES
|
||
|
||
26 Citizens for the Arts
|
||
|
||
27 Clinch River Farms
|
||
|
||
28 Foxtail Orchards, Inc
|
||
|
||
29 Plumb Creek Winery
|
||
|
||
30 Sandy Head Ostrich Farm
|
||
|
||
PARKS
|
||
|
||
31 Big Cedar Creek
|
||
|
||
32 Birch Knob Observation Tower
|
||
|
||
33 Breaks Interstate Park
|
||
|
||
34 Burkes Garden
|
||
|
||
35 Cavitt's Creek Park
|
||
|
||
36 Cedar Bluff
|
||
|
||
37 Clinch River State Park
|
||
|
||
38 Hidden Valley Climbing
|
||
|
||
39 Hidden Valley Wildlife Management Area
|
||
|
||
40 John W Flannagan Dam
|
||
|
||
41 Keen Mountain Park
|
||
|
||
42 Laurel Bed Lake
|
||
|
||
43 Lincolnshire Park
|
||
|
||
44 Pinnacle Natural Area Preserve
|
||
|
||
45 Poplar Gap Park
|
||
|
||
46 Tank Hollow Falls
|
||
|
||
47 The Channels Natural Area Preserve
|
||
|
||
48 Verner Blankenship Community Park
|
||
|
||
TRAILS
|
||
|
||
49 Brumley Mountain Trail
|
||
|
||
50 Coal Canyon Trailhead
|
||
|
||
51 Great Channels Trailhead
|
||
|
||
52 Pocahontas OHV Trailhead
|
||
|
||
53 Ridgeview Trailhead
|
||
|
||
54 Sugar Hill Trail System
|
||
|
||
55 The Original Pocahontas Trailhead
|
||
|
||
2.9.2 Select Tourism Assets
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
2.9.2 Select Tourism Assets
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER
|
||
ACCOMMODATION
|
||
|
||
ODN DOR WY
|
||
|
||
Pe
|
||
ro
|
||
|
||
12
|
||
CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
MUSEUMS
|
||
21
|
||
22
|
||
23
|
||
24
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
Tourist Site
|
||
|
||
Comfort Inn
|
||
Comfort Inn & Suites
|
||
Cuz's Cabins & Restaurant
|
||
Elk Garden Methodist Bike Hostel
|
||
Fincastle Motor Inn
|
||
Holiday Inn Express & Suites Lebanon, an IHG Hotel
|
||
Holiday Inn Express Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
Real McCoy Cabins, Country Store and Kitchen
|
||
Sleep Inn & Suites
|
||
Super 8 by Wyndham Lebanon
|
||
Super 8 Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
lestern Front Hotel
|
||
|
||
Riverbend Campground
|
||
Southern Gap Outdoor Adventure
|
||
Thunder River Campground
|
||
Trailhead ATV Resort
|
||
|
||
z
|
||
a
|
||
x
|
||
3°
|
||
2
|
||
fe)
|
||
>
|
||
cr
|
||
Q
|
||
Sj
|
||
m
|
||
2)
|
||
|
||
Coal Miners' Memorial
|
||
|
||
Ellenbrook Mansion
|
||
|
||
Old Russell County Court House (Robert Dickenson Home)
|
||
alter McDonald Sanders House
|
||
|
||
Dante Coal Miners & Railroad Museum
|
||
Historic Crab Orchard Museum
|
||
|
||
Honaker Heritage Museum
|
||
|
||
Pocahontas Exhibition Coal Mine & Museum
|
||
Ralph Stanley Museum
|
||
|
||
121
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER
|
||
OTHER TOURIST SITES
|
||
26
|
||
27
|
||
28
|
||
29
|
||
30
|
||
PARKS
|
||
31
|
||
32
|
||
33
|
||
34
|
||
35
|
||
36
|
||
37
|
||
38
|
||
39
|
||
40
|
||
41
|
||
42
|
||
43
|
||
44
|
||
45
|
||
46
|
||
47
|
||
48
|
||
TRAI
|
||
|
||
49
|
||
50
|
||
yl
|
||
52
|
||
53
|
||
54
|
||
95
|
||
|
||
Citizens for the Arts
|
||
Clinch River Farms
|
||
Foxtail Orchards, Inc
|
||
Plumb Creek Winery
|
||
‘Sandy Head Ostrich Farm
|
||
|
||
Big Cedar Creek
|
||
|
||
Birch Knob Observation Tower
|
||
Breaks Interstate Park
|
||
|
||
Burkes Garden
|
||
|
||
Cavitt's Creek Park
|
||
|
||
Cedar Bluff
|
||
|
||
Clinch River State Park
|
||
Hidden Valley Climbing
|
||
|
||
Tourist Site
|
||
|
||
Hidden Valley Wildlife Management Area
|
||
|
||
John W Flannagan Dam
|
||
|
||
Keen Mountain Park
|
||
|
||
Laurel Bed Lake
|
||
|
||
Lincolnshire Park
|
||
|
||
Pinnacle Natural Area Preserve
|
||
Poplar Gap Park
|
||
|
||
Tank Hollow Falls
|
||
|
||
The Channels Natural Area Preserve
|
||
Verner Blankenship Community Park
|
||
|
||
Brumley Mountain Trail
|
||
|
||
Coal Canyon Trailhead
|
||
|
||
Great Channels Trailhead
|
||
Pocahontas OHV Trailhead
|
||
Ridgeview Trailhead
|
||
|
||
Sugar Hill Trail System
|
||
|
||
The Original Pocahontas Trailhead
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Business Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
September 2021
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Planning District
|
||
|
||
Commission
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
Planning District
|
||
Commission
|
||
|
||
Business Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
Sie Ae eee HICKEYGLOBAL
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
123
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
The Business Resiliency Strategy Process
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
The pandemic has caused a massive disruption throughout the business community. As recovery efforts unfold,
|
||
|
||
the transition is creating opportunities for prepared communities. Early migration patterns favor non-urban areas
|
||
|
||
with high quality of place and digital infrastructure.
|
||
|
||
To create a Roadmap to Economic Resiliency, Hickey Global conducted three analysis. The first gained insights
|
||
|
||
on past and current pandemic response efforts and future solutions through a Stakeholder Engagement Study.
|
||
|
||
Government, non-profit and business leaders shared insights through in-person meetings and an online survey
|
||
|
||
tool.
|
||
|
||
The second was an Asset Mapping process that analyzed community-level infrastructure deficits as well as
|
||
|
||
assets. Attention was given to infrastructure that inhibited or supported future recovery efforts.
|
||
|
||
The third analysis was a Cluster Verification Study that provided insights to economic drivers in the regional
|
||
|
||
business community. Using a methodical model, a blended portfolio of business clusters was developed
|
||
|
||
containing potential growth industries.
|
||
|
||
In addition, a review of information was completed using the International Economic Development Council’s work
|
||
|
||
on disaster recovery and their joint website with the U.S. Economic Development Administration -
|
||
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org.
|
||
|
||
http://restoreyoureconomy.org/
|
||
Overview
|
||
The Business Resiliency Strategy Process
|
||
|
||
The pandemic has caused a massive disruption throughout the business community. As recovery efforts unfold,
|
||
the transition is creating opportunities for prepared communities. Early migration patterns favor non-urban areas
|
||
with high quality of place and digital infrastructure.
|
||
|
||
To create a Roadmap to Economic Resiliency,
|
||
|
||
Hickey Global conducted three analysis. The first gained insights
|
||
|
||
on past and current pandemic response efforts and future solutions through a Stakeholder Engagement Study.
|
||
|
||
Government, non-profit and business leaders s
|
||
tool.
|
||
|
||
The second was an Asset Mapping process tha
|
||
|
||
hared insights through in-person meetings and an online survey
|
||
|
||
analyzed community-level infrastructure deficits as well as
|
||
|
||
assets. Attention was given to infrastructure that inhibited or supported future recovery efforts.
|
||
|
||
The third analysis was a Cluster Verification Study that provided insights to economic drivers in the regional
|
||
|
||
business community. Using a methodical mod
|
||
containing potential growth industries.
|
||
|
||
el, a blended portfolio of business clusters was developed
|
||
|
||
In addition, a review of information was completed using the International Economic Development Council’s work
|
||
on disaster recovery and their joint website with the U.S. Economic Development Administration -
|
||
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org.
|
||
|
||
123
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
124
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
|
||
Envisioning the Future of the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
The goal of this Roadmap to Economic Resiliency is to help local leaders achieve their vision for this region.
|
||
|
||
Through the stakeholder engagement process the top characteristics of that vision are grouped below. The
|
||
|
||
health of the business community is integral in achieving long-term prosperity.
|
||
|
||
Increased Livability
|
||
|
||
Strong Industrial Base
|
||
|
||
More People and Jobs
|
||
|
||
Strong Tourism Economy
|
||
|
||
BUSINESS LEADERS VISION
|
||
|
||
More Jobs
|
||
|
||
Expanded Tourism
|
||
|
||
More People
|
||
|
||
New Industry
|
||
|
||
COMMUNITY LEADERS VISION
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
Envisioning the Future of the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
The goal of this Roadmap to Economic Resiliency is to help local leaders achieve their vision for this region.
|
||
Through the stakeholder engagement process the top characteristics of that vision are grouped below. The
|
||
health of the business community is integral in achieving long-term prosperity.
|
||
|
||
BUSINESS LEADERS VISION COMMUNITY LEADERS VISION
|
||
Increased Livability More Jobs
|
||
Strong Industrial Base Expanded Tourism
|
||
More People and Jobs More People
|
||
|
||
Strong Tourism Economy New Industry
|
||
|
||
124
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
125
|
||
|
||
Key Recommendations Based on
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback and Research
|
||
|
||
Studies
|
||
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
Key Recommendations Based on
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback and Research
|
||
Studies
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
126
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. A pandemic response board should be established for all business, including tourism, inclusive of subject
|
||
|
||
matter experts and industry representatives to ensure a consistent regional approach and smooth
|
||
|
||
information flow.
|
||
|
||
2. A review of financial support programs used during the pandemic is necessary to improve future efforts
|
||
|
||
as needed.
|
||
|
||
3. There is tremendous support by all respondents for a remote-worker recruitment campaign to increase
|
||
|
||
population and wealth in the area.
|
||
|
||
4. To support business clusters and to disseminate critical information during pandemics and economic
|
||
|
||
downturns, a continued focus on increasing the very successful broadband network in the region is
|
||
|
||
needed.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. A pandemic response board should be established for all business, including tourism, inclusive of subject
|
||
matter experts and industry representatives to ensure a consistent regional approach and smooth
|
||
information flow.
|
||
|
||
2. A review of financial support programs used during the pandemic is necessary to improve future efforts
|
||
as needed.
|
||
|
||
3. There is tremendous support by all respondents for a remote-worker recruitment campaign to increase
|
||
population and wealth in the area.
|
||
|
||
4. To support business clusters and to disseminate critical information during pandemics and economic
|
||
downturns, a continued focus on increasing the very successful broadband network in the region is
|
||
needed.
|
||
|
||
126
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
127
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. The region should pursue a blended portfolio of Traded, Blended and Local clusters in balancing
|
||
|
||
recruiting and existing business efforts.
|
||
|
||
2. Economic development efforts should be focused on Mining, Fabricated Metal and Machinery &
|
||
|
||
Equipment Manufacturing, Shared Services & IT, Tourism and Healthcare.
|
||
|
||
3. Attention should be given to specific strategies for each cluster (listed on the Cluster Strategies Overview
|
||
|
||
page).
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. The region should pursue a blended portfolio of Traded, Blended and Local clusters in balancing
|
||
recruiting and existing business efforts.
|
||
|
||
2. Economic development efforts should be focused on Mining, Fabricated Metal and Machinery &
|
||
Equipment Manufacturing, Shared Services & IT, Tourism and Healthcare.
|
||
|
||
‘
|
||
|
||
Mining Fabricated Machinery and Shared Services
|
||
Metal Equipment & IT
|
||
Manufacturing Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Tourism Healthcare
|
||
|
||
3. Attention should be given to specific strategies for each cluster (listed on the Cluster Strategies Overview
|
||
page).
|
||
|
||
127
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
128
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. Continue successful efforts to deploy broadband throughout the region; especially in residential areas to
|
||
|
||
support work-from-home opportunities. Broadband was the number one infrastructure answer from
|
||
|
||
government and community leaders for strengthening the region.
|
||
|
||
2. Develop a campaign or program to increase computer ownership and internet usage. While broadband
|
||
|
||
capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau, computer and internet usage are low.
|
||
|
||
3. Create a taskforce to address the region’s low worker participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of
|
||
|
||
63%), especially among females (38.6%). Disengaged residents are a source of labor that could
|
||
|
||
overcome current and future workforce needs.
|
||
|
||
4. Continue to develop larger industrial sites and shell buildings that could support a greater range of
|
||
|
||
industrial clients.
|
||
|
||
5. Based on stakeholder feedback from business leaders, more small business and entrepreneurial support
|
||
|
||
services are needed in the region.
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. Continue successful efforts to deploy broadband throughout the region; especially in residential areas to
|
||
support work-from-home opportunities. Broadband was the number one infrastructure answer from
|
||
government and community leaders for strengthening the region.
|
||
|
||
2. Develop a campaign or program to increase computer ownership and internet usage. While broadband
|
||
capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau, computer and internet usage are low.
|
||
|
||
3. Create a taskforce to address the region’s low worker participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of
|
||
63%), especially among females (38.6%). Disengaged residents are a source of labor that could
|
||
overcome current and future workforce needs.
|
||
|
||
4. Continue to develop larger industrial sites and shell buildings that could support a greater range of
|
||
industrial clients.
|
||
|
||
5. Based on stakeholder feedback from business leaders, more small business and entrepreneurial support
|
||
services are needed in the region.
|
||
|
||
128
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
129
|
||
|
||
Business Retention and Expansion (BRE)
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
Using a BRE program to prepare companies in the region for a disaster or economic downturn and then
|
||
|
||
support them during recovery is a key resiliency strategy for the community. BRE strategies enhance
|
||
|
||
capacity for recovery and strengthen existing business networks. The region should support their local
|
||
|
||
economic developers in implementing these strategies:
|
||
|
||
1. Encourage businesses to develop business continuity plans by providing workshops to small and
|
||
midsized firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
2. Encourage businesses to develop business preparedness plans by providing workshops to small and
|
||
midsized firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
3. Support each county in developing its own economic planning and recovery team using engaged
|
||
business leaders (see guidance on building a team).
|
||
|
||
4. Establish a business recovery fund so there is an immediate and locally-controlled source of financial
|
||
support for existing businesses.
|
||
|
||
5. Establish plans with local utilities and emergency management authorities to facilitate the prioritization
|
||
of utilities to key business parks and industries.
|
||
|
||
6. Include local economic developers on the county emergency management teams.
|
||
|
||
7. Encourage local economic developers to develop their own preparedness and continuity plans to create
|
||
a capacity to support businesses in an economic crisis.
|
||
|
||
Business Retention and Expansion (BRE)
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
Using a BRE program to prepare companies in the region for a disaster or economic downturn and then
|
||
support them during recovery is a key resiliency strategy for the community. BRE strategies enhance
|
||
capacity for recovery and strengthen existing business networks. The region should support their local
|
||
economic developers in implementing these strategies:
|
||
|
||
1. Encourage businesses to develop business continuity plans by providing workshops to small and
|
||
midsized firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
2. Encourage businesses to develop business preparedness plans by providing workshops to small and
|
||
midsized firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
3. Support each county in developing its own economic planning and recovery team using engaged
|
||
business leaders (see guidance on building a team).
|
||
|
||
4. Establish a business recovery fund so there is an immediate and locally-controlled source of financial
|
||
support for existing businesses.
|
||
|
||
5. Establish plans with local utilities and emergency management authorities to facilitate the prioritization
|
||
of utilities to key business parks and industries.
|
||
|
||
6. Include local economic developers on the county emergency management teams.
|
||
|
||
7. Encourage local economic developers to develop their own preparedness and continuity plans to create
|
||
a Capacity to support businesses in an economic crisis.
|
||
|
||
129
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
130
|
||
|
||
Input and Ideas from Business and
|
||
|
||
Community Leaders
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
|
||
Input and Ideas from Business and
|
||
|
||
Community Leaders
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
131
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. A pandemic response board should be established for all business, including tourism, inclusive of subject
|
||
|
||
matter experts and industry representatives to ensure a consistent regional approach and smooth
|
||
|
||
information flow.
|
||
|
||
2. A review of financial support programs used during the pandemic is necessary to improve future efforts
|
||
|
||
as needed.
|
||
|
||
3. There is tremendous support by all respondents for a remote-worker recruitment campaign to increase
|
||
|
||
population and wealth in the area.
|
||
|
||
4. To support business clusters and to disseminate critical information during pandemics and economic
|
||
|
||
downturns, a continued focus on increasing the very successful broadband network in the region is
|
||
|
||
needed.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Engagement
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. A pandemic response board should be established for all business, including tourism, inclusive of subject
|
||
matter experts and industry representatives to ensure a consistent regional approach and smooth
|
||
information flow.
|
||
|
||
2. A review of financial support programs used during the pandemic is necessary to improve future efforts
|
||
as needed.
|
||
|
||
3. There is tremendous support by all respondents for a remote-worker recruitment campaign to increase
|
||
population and wealth in the area.
|
||
|
||
4. To support business clusters and to disseminate critical information during pandemics and economic
|
||
downturns, a continued focus on increasing the very successful broadband network in the region is
|
||
needed.
|
||
|
||
131
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
132
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
More Effective Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
Better, more accurate and more
|
||
|
||
streamlined information was the
|
||
|
||
most frequent suggestion in
|
||
|
||
improving area pandemic response.
|
||
|
||
Even in many of the
|
||
|
||
recommendations around costs,
|
||
|
||
additional information is the key with
|
||
|
||
better information on grant program
|
||
|
||
qualifications and costs associated
|
||
|
||
with a pandemic operating
|
||
|
||
environment. The calls for additional
|
||
|
||
community engagement also echo
|
||
|
||
desires for communication and a
|
||
|
||
streamlined flow of information.
|
||
|
||
What would have made the
|
||
|
||
region's business-related
|
||
|
||
pandemic response efforts
|
||
|
||
more effective?
|
||
|
||
• Education component was missing.
|
||
|
||
• Rules and actual business education around response and guideline.
|
||
|
||
• Education on the vaccines was lacking.
|
||
|
||
• More information on actual guidelines as well as information on the
|
||
|
||
reasoning behind those guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Banks not informed of grant guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Better instructions.
|
||
|
||
• Not much guidance on how to handle COVID guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• No singular vision for how to handle restrictions and get educated on health
|
||
|
||
needs and safety standards.
|
||
|
||
• No clear leadership from health department on business-specific guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Better information.
|
||
|
||
• Difficult to maintain policies for staff and guests due to lack of time, depth of
|
||
|
||
info, lack of clarification.
|
||
|
||
• Target businesses specifically for information.
|
||
|
||
• Need better local information source.
|
||
|
||
• More timely information. Announcements on Friday evenings after close not
|
||
|
||
helpful because you couldn't receive further guidance.
|
||
|
||
Information
|
||
• Would've liked more county support for grants through pandemic and into
|
||
|
||
the future. Matching through VCEDA.
|
||
|
||
• State grant assistance and PPP wasn't sufficient for small business needs.
|
||
|
||
• Funding a vocational skills program would have been essential to post
|
||
|
||
pandemic recovery.
|
||
|
||
• Difficulty to get money through larger funds due to restrictions around
|
||
|
||
qualifications.
|
||
|
||
• Resources got a bit swamped, and grant systems got overwhelmed.
|
||
|
||
• Costs went up due to reinvestment in businesses and that wasn't covered by
|
||
|
||
grant funding.
|
||
|
||
• Had to make an investment to meet COVID standards without sufficient
|
||
|
||
funding support for those needs.
|
||
|
||
• Filled out numerous grants but got bumped back due to grant qualifications.
|
||
|
||
Feels like a waste of time.
|
||
|
||
• Help with upfront costs to new business to meet pandemic needs.
|
||
|
||
• People had no information that grant money was being made available.
|
||
|
||
• Needed funding faster.
|
||
|
||
Cost
|
||
|
||
• More involvement from county and town. Feels like business owners are on
|
||
|
||
their own.
|
||
|
||
• Coordination between States (border communities).
|
||
|
||
• Need better regional connection to SBDC.
|
||
|
||
• Needed better pandemic exit strategy.
|
||
|
||
Community Involvement
|
||
• Better promotion and active engagement with marketing materials
|
||
|
||
especially when put online.
|
||
|
||
• Instead of pouring money into individual payments, preferred to see the
|
||
|
||
community colleges funded and staffed with educational programs that can
|
||
|
||
provide skilled workers to the manufacturing industry.
|
||
|
||
• PPE availability.
|
||
|
||
• More testing needed.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
More Effective Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
What would have made the
|
||
region's business-related
|
||
pandemic response efforts
|
||
more effective?
|
||
|
||
Better, more accurate and more
|
||
streamlined information was the
|
||
most frequent suggestion in
|
||
improving area pandemic response.
|
||
Even in many of the
|
||
recommendations around costs,
|
||
additional information is the key with
|
||
better information on grant program
|
||
qualifications and costs associated
|
||
with a pandemic operating
|
||
environment. The calls for additional
|
||
community engagement also echo
|
||
desires for communication and a
|
||
streamlined flow of information.
|
||
|
||
e Education component was missing.
|
||
e Rules and actual business education around response and guideline.
|
||
|
||
e Education on the vaccines was lacking.
|
||
|
||
¢ More information on actual guidelines as well as information on the
|
||
reasoning behind those guidelines.
|
||
|
||
e Banks not informed of grant guidelines.
|
||
¢ Better instructions.
|
||
e Not much guidance on how to handle COVID guidelines.
|
||
|
||
e No singular vision for how to handle restrictions and get educated on health
|
||
needs and safety standards.
|
||
|
||
e Noclear leadership from health department on business-specific guidelines.
|
||
¢ Better information.
|
||
|
||
e Difficult to maintain policies for staff and guests due to lack of time, depth of
|
||
info, lack of clarification.
|
||
|
||
e Target businesses specifically for information.
|
||
¢ Need better local information source.
|
||
|
||
e More timely information. Announcements on Friday evenings after close not
|
||
helpful because you couldn't receive further guidance.
|
||
|
||
Community Involvement
|
||
|
||
¢ More involvement from county and town. Feels like business owners are on
|
||
their own.
|
||
|
||
© Coordination between States (border communities).
|
||
e Need better regional connection to SBDC.
|
||
e Needed better pandemic exit strategy.
|
||
|
||
132
|
||
|
||
Cost.
|
||
|
||
e Would've liked more county support for grants through pandemic and into
|
||
the future. Matching through VCEDA.
|
||
|
||
e State grant assistance and PPP wasn't sufficient for small business needs.
|
||
|
||
e Funding a vocational skills program would have been essential to post
|
||
pandemic recovery.
|
||
|
||
© Difficulty to get money through larger funds due to restrictions around
|
||
qualifications.
|
||
|
||
e Resources got a bit swamped, and grant systems got overwhelmed.
|
||
|
||
¢ Costs went up due to reinvestment in businesses and that wasn't covered by
|
||
grant funding.
|
||
|
||
e Had to make an investment to meet COVID standards without sufficient
|
||
funding support for those needs.
|
||
|
||
e Filled out numerous grants but got bumped back due to grant qualifications.
|
||
Feels like a waste of time.
|
||
|
||
e Help with upfront costs to new business to meet pandemic needs.
|
||
e People had no information that grant money was being made available.
|
||
e Needed funding faster.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
e Better promotion and active engagement with marketing materials
|
||
especially when put online.
|
||
|
||
e Instead of pouring money into individual payments, preferred to see the
|
||
community colleges funded and staffed with educational programs that can
|
||
provide skilled workers to the manufacturing industry.
|
||
|
||
e PPE availability.
|
||
e More testing needed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
133
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Sources for Business
|
||
|
||
What sources did you use
|
||
|
||
to gain information about
|
||
|
||
pandemic response,
|
||
|
||
guidelines, and recovery
|
||
|
||
resources?
|
||
|
||
• CDC website.
|
||
|
||
• SBA website
|
||
|
||
• County did active outreach.
|
||
|
||
• County website
|
||
|
||
• CDC website
|
||
|
||
• SBDC
|
||
|
||
• Workforce Development Board
|
||
|
||
• Used small business assistance center at the
|
||
|
||
college.
|
||
|
||
• County officials
|
||
|
||
• Heart of Appalachian pushed out recovery
|
||
|
||
information and grant funding
|
||
|
||
• State briefings
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• Workforce board
|
||
|
||
• Workforce development board
|
||
|
||
• Press releases from governor's office
|
||
|
||
• DCR had updated and recently refreshed
|
||
|
||
documents.
|
||
|
||
• Received information from the county with emails.
|
||
|
||
• IDA let owners know about grant program.
|
||
|
||
• CDC website.
|
||
|
||
• Governor’s press conferences.
|
||
|
||
• Local health department on local guidelines and
|
||
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
• Health department for information.
|
||
|
||
• Straight from health department.
|
||
|
||
• Health department guidance. Although sometimes
|
||
|
||
document would be issued and then changes.
|
||
|
||
• Health department provided information, but also
|
||
|
||
acted as enforcement.
|
||
|
||
Government & Nonprofit
|
||
• Person to person.
|
||
|
||
• Word of mouth
|
||
|
||
• Word of mouth
|
||
|
||
• Lots of word of mouth.
|
||
|
||
Person-to-Person
|
||
|
||
• Online news sources.
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Emails
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
• Found out about grants through Facebook.
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
Online
|
||
|
||
• CPA did application for PPP.
|
||
|
||
• Information on loans from local banks.
|
||
|
||
• Accountant
|
||
|
||
• Chamber
|
||
|
||
• Chamber emails.
|
||
|
||
• SVAM - Southwest Virginia Association of
|
||
|
||
Manufactures
|
||
|
||
Professionals & Organizations
|
||
|
||
• News
|
||
|
||
• National news but messages were very
|
||
|
||
mixed.
|
||
|
||
• News
|
||
|
||
• General news sources.
|
||
|
||
• Newspaper
|
||
|
||
News
|
||
|
||
• Made a lot of outgoing calls to prepare
|
||
|
||
and ensure within compliance.
|
||
|
||
• Dual state situation required multi-state
|
||
|
||
coordination. KY and VA response
|
||
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
• Consultant stayed up on information
|
||
|
||
and pushed that out.
|
||
|
||
• No common leadership sources of
|
||
|
||
information.
|
||
|
||
• Corporate HQ.
|
||
|
||
MiscellaneousThere is a strong willingness in the
|
||
|
||
business community to use
|
||
|
||
government information. Businesses
|
||
|
||
used numerous sources for
|
||
|
||
information with Government &
|
||
|
||
Nonprofit being the number one
|
||
|
||
source.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Sources for Business
|
||
|
||
What did Government & Nonprofit Person-to-Person News
|
||
at sources did you use » CDC website. * Person to person. + News
|
||
8 . e SBA website
|
||
to gain information about * County did active outreach. ° Word of mouth National news but messages were very
|
||
. * County website ° Word of mouth mixed.
|
||
pa ndemic response, e CDC website e Lots of word of mouth.
|
||
° SBDC e News
|
||
uidelines, and recover * Workforce Development Board .
|
||
8 ’ y e Used small business assistance center at the Online ° General news sources.
|
||
resources? college. © Online news sources. e Newspaper
|
||
e County officials
|
||
e Heart of Appalachian pushed out recovery ° Internet .
|
||
There is a strong willingness in the information and grant funding e Internet Miscellaneous
|
||
. . ° State briefings e Internet ;
|
||
business community to use ° CDC Internet ° Made a lot of outgoing calls to prepare
|
||
government information. Businesses © Workforce board 0 eme and ensure within compliance.
|
||
‘ © Workforce development board ° Emails oo . .
|
||
used numerous sources for © Press releases from governor's office © Facebook ° Dual state situation required multi-state
|
||
© DCR had updated and recently refreshed coordination. KY and VA response
|
||
|
||
information with Government &
|
||
Nonprofit being the number one
|
||
source.
|
||
|
||
documents.
|
||
|
||
Received information from the county with emails.
|
||
IDA let owners know about grant program.
|
||
|
||
CDC website.
|
||
|
||
Governor’s press conferences.
|
||
|
||
Local health department on local guidelines and
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
Health department for information.
|
||
|
||
Straight from health department.
|
||
|
||
Health department guidance. Although sometimes
|
||
document would be issued and then changes.
|
||
Health department provided information, but also
|
||
acted as enforcement.
|
||
|
||
133
|
||
|
||
e Found out about grants through Facebook.
|
||
e Facebook
|
||
|
||
Professionals & Organizations
|
||
e CPA did application for PPP.
|
||
|
||
e Information on loans from local banks.
|
||
e Accountant
|
||
|
||
e Chamber
|
||
|
||
e Chamber emails.
|
||
|
||
e SVAM - Southwest Virginia Association of
|
||
Manufactures
|
||
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
e Consultant stayed up on information
|
||
and pushed that out.
|
||
|
||
e No common leadership sources of
|
||
information.
|
||
|
||
° Corporate HQ.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
134
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Information Sources for Business
|
||
|
||
And did you feel adequately
|
||
|
||
informed by those sources?
|
||
|
||
Just under 50% of stakeholders
|
||
|
||
did not feel adequately informed
|
||
|
||
by the multiple sources of
|
||
|
||
information they used to craft their
|
||
|
||
pandemic response.
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Information Sources for Business
|
||
|
||
And did you feel adequately
|
||
informed by those sources?
|
||
|
||
Somewhat
|
||
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Just under 50% of stakeholders
|
||
did not feel adequately informed
|
||
by the multiple sources of
|
||
information they used to craft their
|
||
pandemic response.
|
||
|
||
134
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
135
|
||
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau should
|
||
|
||
create a communications
|
||
|
||
structure that allows information
|
||
|
||
to be disseminated quickly and
|
||
|
||
effectively. Information should be
|
||
|
||
aggregated from reliable sources
|
||
|
||
by government entities which
|
||
|
||
already have a community
|
||
|
||
presence and then distributed
|
||
|
||
throughout the region.
|
||
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau should
|
||
|
||
create a communications
|
||
structure that allows information
|
||
to be disseminated quickly and
|
||
effectively. Information should be —_
|
||
aggregated from reliable sources 7, ~~
|
||
by government entities which [
|
||
already have a community \ |
|
||
presence and then distributed N~
|
||
|
||
throughout the region.
|
||
|
||
LOCAL
|
||
POLICY
|
||
|
||
Bi-Weekly
|
||
Conference
|
||
Calls
|
||
|
||
Signage &
|
||
|
||
Advertising
|
||
|
||
Business [
|
||
Leaders \
|
||
|
||
135
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
136
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Business-related Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
And what was done well
|
||
|
||
(with region's business-
|
||
|
||
related pandemic response
|
||
|
||
efforts)?
|
||
|
||
• Board of supervisors were supportive of businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Help with navigating the language of the mandates.
|
||
|
||
• County tourism called to check in on reopening; fairly regular
|
||
|
||
communications.
|
||
|
||
• Everyone worked together.
|
||
|
||
• Overall, good. Proactive reach out.
|
||
|
||
Community Response
|
||
|
||
• Grant funding was well run and distributed effectively.
|
||
|
||
• CARES money was distributed well.
|
||
|
||
• IDA had funds available quickly. Application process was very
|
||
|
||
easy.
|
||
|
||
• Turnaround on funds was fast to get people reopened.
|
||
|
||
• Grant access was smooth and there was assistance in getting
|
||
|
||
funding.
|
||
|
||
• PPP distribution was done well. Business wouldn't have
|
||
|
||
survived without it.
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau provided me with easy access to
|
||
|
||
funds to build our capabilities which allowed me to hire
|
||
|
||
additional workers.
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
|
||
• Promotion for grant programs was done well.
|
||
|
||
• UVA Wise program helped to develop a website.
|
||
|
||
• Mask billboards did well.
|
||
|
||
Marketing
|
||
|
||
• Did a great job working with local health department on what
|
||
|
||
was expected.
|
||
|
||
• Health care stepped up with testing.
|
||
|
||
• Vaccine rollout did well.
|
||
|
||
• Contact with local health department office and covid clinics.
|
||
|
||
• Acted quickly to protect the aging population.
|
||
|
||
• Rollout of the vaccines went well.
|
||
|
||
• Hands-on health department. Had active outreach from health
|
||
|
||
department for events.
|
||
|
||
Health Services
|
||
|
||
Most responses focused on the
|
||
|
||
multiple financial support programs
|
||
|
||
developed and implemented and the
|
||
|
||
work of the local health departments.
|
||
|
||
Review and improvement of the
|
||
|
||
funding programs regarding clarity,
|
||
|
||
process and implementation is
|
||
|
||
needed.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Business-related Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
And what was done well
|
||
(with region's business-
|
||
related pandemic response
|
||
efforts)?
|
||
|
||
Most responses focused on the
|
||
multiple financial support programs
|
||
developed and implemented and the
|
||
work of the local health departments.
|
||
Review and improvement of the
|
||
funding programs regarding clarity,
|
||
process and implementation is
|
||
needed.
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
|
||
e Grant funding was well run and distributed effectively.
|
||
e CARES money was distributed well.
|
||
|
||
e IDA had funds available quickly. Application process was very
|
||
easy.
|
||
|
||
e Turnaround on funds was fast to get people reopened.
|
||
|
||
e Grant access was smooth and there was assistance in getting
|
||
funding.
|
||
|
||
e PPP distribution was done well. Business wouldn't have
|
||
survived without it.
|
||
|
||
e The Cumberland Plateau provided me with easy access to
|
||
funds to build our capabilities which allowed me to hire
|
||
additional workers.
|
||
|
||
Community Response
|
||
|
||
e Board of supervisors were supportive of businesses.
|
||
e Help with navigating the language of the mandates.
|
||
|
||
e County tourism called to check in on reopening; fairly regular
|
||
communications.
|
||
|
||
e Everyone worked together.
|
||
|
||
© Overall, good. Proactive reach out.
|
||
|
||
136
|
||
|
||
Health Services
|
||
|
||
e Did a great job working with local health department on what
|
||
was expected.
|
||
|
||
e Health care stepped up with testing.
|
||
|
||
e Vaccine rollout did well.
|
||
|
||
¢ Contact with local health department office and covid clinics.
|
||
e Acted quickly to protect the aging population.
|
||
|
||
e Rollout of the vaccines went well.
|
||
|
||
e Hands-on health department. Had active outreach from health
|
||
department for events.
|
||
|
||
Marketing
|
||
|
||
e Promotion for grant programs was done well.
|
||
e UVA Wise program helped to develop a website.
|
||
e Mask billboards did well.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
137
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Remote Worker Recruitment
|
||
|
||
If the region embarked on an aggressive remote-worker recruitment campaign to
|
||
|
||
import a tech-savvy workforce, would it benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
82% No
|
||
|
||
18%
|
||
|
||
Business Leaders Response
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
100%
|
||
|
||
Community Leaders Response
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Remote Worker Recruitment
|
||
|
||
If the region embarked on an aggressive remote-worker recruitment campaign to
|
||
import a tech-savvy workforce, would it benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
Business Leaders Response Community Leaders Response
|
||
|
||
137
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
138
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Why Businesses Support the Initiative
|
||
|
||
… if the region embarked
|
||
|
||
on an aggressive remote-
|
||
|
||
worker recruitment
|
||
|
||
campaign to import a tech-
|
||
|
||
savvy workforce, would it
|
||
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
• There would be a substantial increase in outsiders settling in the area.
|
||
|
||
• Has seen an increase since the pandemic in remote workers coming to
|
||
town for travel.
|
||
|
||
• Would help with population loss.
|
||
|
||
• Would be helpful for locals increasing restaurant demand.
|
||
|
||
• Area offers low cost of living.
|
||
|
||
• Would assist with building back population base.
|
||
|
||
• More time and space to remote work because the commute is replaced by
|
||
time to enjoy the community.
|
||
|
||
• Tax dollar improvement. Additional local support for businesses and buying
|
||
power of new people coming into town.
|
||
|
||
• Already seeing some remote worker resettlement in the area.
|
||
|
||
• Brings in young people with children.
|
||
|
||
• Anything to get more people to live here.
|
||
|
||
• Yes, for tech savvy and general workers.
|
||
|
||
• Need more workers in skilled labor in addition to tech.
|
||
|
||
• Need IT and cybersecurity staff - FT and PT
|
||
|
||
• Need IT skills and drafting and engineering.
|
||
|
||
• Already seeing remote worker relocation.
|
||
|
||
• Interest in purchasing vacation homes first and then working remote.
|
||
|
||
• Stemming young population decline and replacing it with remote work.
|
||
|
||
• Bringing population in from outside to maintain houses and the area.
|
||
|
||
• Could help support service industry.
|
||
|
||
• Bring in industry, ideas and experience with new people coming into area.
|
||
|
||
• Need more technology and marketing workers.
|
||
|
||
• See more engagement with remote workers who are looking for a break.
|
||
|
||
• See temporary workers wanting to stay.
|
||
|
||
• More tax base.
|
||
|
||
• Fill empty available housing.
|
||
|
||
• Have seen some remote workers. Can envision a workforce that wants to
|
||
get away from it all but can also work remotely. Wifi allows that ability.
|
||
|
||
• Could see the business benefiting, have had some remote workers work
|
||
from the campsite.
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
With best-in-class broadband
|
||
|
||
capability in the region, recruiting
|
||
|
||
and supporting remote-workers is
|
||
|
||
considered a major benefit to the
|
||
|
||
region.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Why Businesses Support the Initiative
|
||
|
||
... if the region embarked
|
||
on an aggressive remote-
|
||
worker recruitment
|
||
campaign to import a tech-
|
||
savvy workforce, would it
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
With best-in-class broadband
|
||
capability in the region, recruiting
|
||
and supporting remote-workers is
|
||
considered a major benefit to the
|
||
region.
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
There would be a substantial increase in outsiders settling in the area.
|
||
|
||
Has seen an increase since the pandemic in remote workers coming to
|
||
town for travel.
|
||
|
||
Would help with population loss.
|
||
|
||
Would be helpful for locals increasing restaurant demand.
|
||
Area offers low cost of living.
|
||
|
||
Would assist with building back population base.
|
||
|
||
More time and space to remote work because the commute is replaced by
|
||
time to enjoy the community.
|
||
|
||
Tax dollar improvement. Additional local support for businesses and buying
|
||
power of new people coming into town.
|
||
|
||
Already seeing some remote worker resettlement in the area.
|
||
Brings in young people with children.
|
||
|
||
Anything to get more people to live here.
|
||
|
||
Yes, for tech savvy and general workers.
|
||
|
||
Need more workers in skilled labor in addition to tech.
|
||
|
||
Need IT and cybersecurity staff - FT and PT
|
||
|
||
138
|
||
|
||
Need IT skills and drafting and engineering.
|
||
|
||
Already seeing remote worker relocation.
|
||
|
||
Interest in purchasing vacation homes first and then working remote.
|
||
Stemming young population decline and replacing it with remote work.
|
||
Bringing population in from outside to maintain houses and the area.
|
||
Could help support service industry.
|
||
|
||
Bring in industry, ideas and experience with new people coming into area.
|
||
Need more technology and marketing workers.
|
||
|
||
See more engagement with remote workers who are looking for a break.
|
||
See temporary workers wanting to stay.
|
||
|
||
More tax base.
|
||
|
||
Fill empty available housing.
|
||
|
||
Have seen some remote workers. Can envision a workforce that wants to
|
||
get away from it all but can also work remotely. Wifi allows that ability.
|
||
|
||
Could see the business benefiting, have had some remote workers work
|
||
from the campsite.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
139
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Why Governments & Nonprofits Support the Initiative
|
||
|
||
… If the region embarked
|
||
|
||
on an aggressive remote-
|
||
|
||
worker recruitment
|
||
|
||
campaign to import a tech-
|
||
|
||
savvy workforce, would it
|
||
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
• Due to internet, now easier.
|
||
|
||
• Easier after pandemic.
|
||
|
||
• Easier here now but also everywhere else too.
|
||
|
||
• Do you recruit jobs first or workers first.
|
||
|
||
• Already have top robotics team in area.
|
||
|
||
• Yes, but jobs as well as workers.
|
||
|
||
• Remote workers will not necessarily solve population loss and lack of
|
||
workforce; however, there spouses and children will in the long term.
|
||
|
||
• Such workers likely will have more discretionary income to support the
|
||
amenities necessary to attract and retain businesses.
|
||
|
||
• It's needed.
|
||
|
||
• I think the region would be very attractive to such a workforce.
|
||
|
||
• Tide began to shift before pandemic, 25% of real estate was from out of
|
||
state.
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
Government & Nonprofits leaders
|
||
|
||
mirror business leaders in supporting
|
||
|
||
this program to increase the
|
||
|
||
workforce and wealth in the
|
||
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
• Seen a shift in work to remote work, pushing office staff towards working
|
||
at home.
|
||
|
||
• Communities in the area could use remote workers if internet
|
||
infrastructure goes forward.
|
||
|
||
• Frustrating because there is broadband, but people are still using cable
|
||
instead.
|
||
|
||
• Remote healthcare might help bring fresh ideas to the table
|
||
|
||
• Businesses doing a better job at providing for visitors.
|
||
|
||
• People are looking to small towns for outdoor rec and good outdoor
|
||
access.
|
||
|
||
• Realized how vital broadband is, more people means more
|
||
entrepreneurial opportunities and greater demand for outdoor rec.
|
||
|
||
• People who have a positive tourism experience are more likely to
|
||
relocate, outsiders view assets differently than locals.
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Why Governments & Nonprofits Support the Initiative
|
||
|
||
... If the region embarked
|
||
on an aggressive remote-
|
||
worker recruitment
|
||
campaign to import a tech-
|
||
savvy workforce, would it
|
||
benefit the region?
|
||
|
||
Government & Nonprofits leaders
|
||
mirror business leaders in supporting
|
||
this program to increase the
|
||
workforce and wealth in the
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
Why?
|
||
|
||
e Due to internet, now easier.
|
||
|
||
e Easier after pandemic.
|
||
|
||
e Easier here now but also everywhere else too.
|
||
e Do you recruit jobs first or workers first.
|
||
|
||
e Already have top robotics team in area.
|
||
|
||
e Yes, but jobs as well as workers.
|
||
|
||
e Remote workers will not necessarily solve population loss and lack of
|
||
workforce; however, there spouses and children will in the long term.
|
||
|
||
e Such workers likely will have more discretionary income to support the
|
||
amenities necessary to attract and retain businesses.
|
||
|
||
e It's needed.
|
||
e | think the region would be very attractive to such a workforce.
|
||
|
||
© Tide began to shift before pandemic, 25% of real estate was from out of
|
||
state.
|
||
|
||
139
|
||
|
||
© Seen a shift in work to remote work, pushing office staff towards working
|
||
at home.
|
||
|
||
e Communities in the area could use remote workers if internet
|
||
infrastructure goes forward.
|
||
|
||
e Frustrating because there is broadband, but people are still using cable
|
||
instead.
|
||
|
||
e Remote healthcare might help bring fresh ideas to the table
|
||
e Businesses doing a better job at providing for visitors.
|
||
|
||
e People are looking to small towns for outdoor rec and good outdoor
|
||
access.
|
||
|
||
e Realized how vital broadband is, more people means more
|
||
entrepreneurial opportunities and greater demand for outdoor rec.
|
||
|
||
e People who have a positive tourism experience are more likely to
|
||
relocate, outsiders view assets differently than locals.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
140
|
||
|
||
Attraction and Existing Business
|
||
|
||
Strategies
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
|
||
Attraction and Existing Business
|
||
|
||
Strategies
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
141
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. The region should pursue a blended portfolio of Traded, Blended and Local clusters in balancing recruiting
|
||
|
||
and existing business efforts.
|
||
|
||
2. Economic development efforts should be focused on Mining, Fabricated Metal and Machinery & Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing, Shared Services & IT, Tourism and Healthcare.
|
||
|
||
3. Attention should be given to specific strategies for each cluster (listed on the Cluster Strategies Overview page).
|
||
|
||
Cluster Verification
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. The region should pursue a blended portfolio of Traded, Blended and Local clusters in balancing recruiting
|
||
and existing business efforts.
|
||
|
||
2. Economic development efforts should be focused on Mining, Fabricated Metal and Machinery & Equipment
|
||
Manufacturing, Shared Services & IT, Tourism and Healthcare.
|
||
|
||
‘
|
||
|
||
Mining Fabricated Machinery and Shared Services Tourism Healthcare
|
||
Metal Equipment & IT
|
||
Manufacturing Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
3. Attention should be given to specific strategies for each cluster (listed on the Cluster Strategies Overview page).
|
||
|
||
141
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
142
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau Location Quotient vs. Growth Rate
|
||
Location Quotient vs. Projected U.S. Compound Annual Growth Rate by Sector
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s mining industry is
|
||
|
||
exceptional compared to the rest of the
|
||
|
||
country, but the region has low Location
|
||
|
||
Quotients in each of the remaining sectors.
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau has the largest
|
||
|
||
competitive advantage (as measured by
|
||
|
||
location quotient) in Mining, Health Care,
|
||
|
||
and Construction. With the exception of
|
||
|
||
Health Care, these industries are projected
|
||
|
||
to decline over the next five years.
|
||
|
||
• Although Manufacturing and Professional
|
||
|
||
Services have below-average location
|
||
|
||
quotients, those sectors make up a
|
||
|
||
significant portion of the overall workforce
|
||
|
||
and are projected to increase.
|
||
|
||
• Roughly 8 percent of the region’s total
|
||
|
||
workforce is in Mining, resulting in a high
|
||
|
||
location quotient. The pace by which the
|
||
|
||
Mining sector is expected to decline is a
|
||
|
||
moderate compound annual rate of -0.78%
|
||
|
||
but may be higher depending on market
|
||
|
||
trends.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
JE
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau Location Quotient vs. Growth Rate
|
||
Location Quotient vs. Projected U.S. Compound Annual Growth Rate by Sector
|
||
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
5%
|
||
|
||
3%
|
||
|
||
2%
|
||
|
||
-2%
|
||
|
||
PROJECTED C.A.G.R. 2020 - 2025
|
||
|
||
-3%
|
||
|
||
-5%
|
||
|
||
6%
|
||
|
||
0% ©
|
||
|
||
Administrative & Support/Waste Management
|
||
|
||
+ Professional Services
|
||
-—+ Manufacturing
|
||
/-— Utilities
|
||
|
||
+ Accommodation, Food & Service
|
||
/ » Other Services
|
||
/ ~* Health Care & Social Assistance
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
|
||
Traded fidustry
|
||
|
||
Local dustry
|
||
|
||
Blended industry
|
||
|
||
1,000 Employees
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
Minin
|
||
|
||
g, 1B
|
||
|
||
= J
|
||
© sd
|
||
|
||
&
|
||
|
||
t)
|
||
0 5 10 15 20 25
|
||
|
||
Educational Services -
|
||
Wholesale Trade »
|
||
Agriculture * Ss
|
||
Information ~~
|
||
\
|
||
©
|
||
/ ~ Real Estate
|
||
Arts, Entertainment, *
|
||
& Recreation
|
||
e
|
||
Transportation & Warehousing -—~
|
||
Finance & Insurance
|
||
0.0
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
= Management of Companines
|
||
v4 & Enterprises L
|
||
|
||
0.8
|
||
|
||
“C
|
||
|
||
instruction
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1=U.S. Average
|
||
|
||
142
|
||
|
||
15
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s mining industry is
|
||
exceptional compared to the rest of the
|
||
country, but the region has low Location
|
||
Quotients in each of the remaining sectors.
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
e The Cumberland Plateau has the largest
|
||
competitive advantage (as measured by
|
||
location quotient) in Mining, Health Care,
|
||
and Construction. With the exception of
|
||
Health Care, these industries are projected
|
||
to decline over the next five years.
|
||
|
||
e Although Manufacturing and Professional
|
||
Services have below-average location
|
||
quotients, those sectors make up a
|
||
significant portion of the overall workforce
|
||
and are projected to increase.
|
||
|
||
e Roughly 8 percent of the region’s total
|
||
workforce is in Mining, resulting in a high
|
||
location quotient. The pace by which the
|
||
Mining sector is expected to decline is a
|
||
moderate compound annual rate of -0.78%
|
||
but may be higher depending on market
|
||
trends.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
143
|
||
|
||
Recession Cluster Analysis
|
||
Industry Sector Performance During
|
||
|
||
Recessions
|
||
|
||
Resiliency planning takes into consideration the negative economic impacts
|
||
|
||
of future economic downturns. One aspect is to understand how clusters
|
||
|
||
perform during historic economic downturns. The accompanying chart
|
||
|
||
averages the past two major recessions in 2001 and 2008. Although the
|
||
|
||
total economy declined, some industry sectors grew.
|
||
|
||
Two of the Cumberland Plateau’s largest industry clusters – Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
and Tourism - suffer deep declines during recessions. The region’s major
|
||
|
||
cluster – Mining – performs well during such events.
|
||
|
||
Because a sector declines as a whole does not mean that all the components
|
||
|
||
decline. For instance, outdoor tourism increased during the pandemic as
|
||
|
||
the overall industry decreased.
|
||
|
||
Traded clusters are an important consideration as they are the foundational
|
||
|
||
base of a regional economy. It is impractical to abandon a base cluster
|
||
|
||
solely based on its economic downturn performance.
|
||
|
||
This cluster strategy takes all of this into consideration by blending a
|
||
|
||
portfolio of clusters to lessen the impacts of an economic downturn while
|
||
|
||
growing the economy in the long-term.
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE QUARTERLY GDP CHANGE BY INDUSTRY 2001 & GREAT RECESSION
|
||
|
||
Recession Cluster Analysis
|
||
Industry Sector Performance During
|
||
|
||
Recessions
|
||
AVERAGE QUARTERLY GDP CHANGE BY INDUSTRY 2001 & GREAT RECESSION
|
||
Resiliency planning takes into consideration the negative economic impacts Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction =
|
||
of future economic downturns. One aspect is to understand how clusters Healthcare & Social Assistance =
|
||
perform during historic economic downturns. The accompanying chart Finance & Insurance -_
|
||
. oo G t
|
||
averages the past two major recessions in 2001 and 2008. Although the overnimen I
|
||
. . Real Estate & Rental & Leasing | |
|
||
total economy declined, some industry sectors grew. \
|
||
Educational Services a
|
||
Two of the Cumberland Plateau’s largest industry clusters — Manufacturi information
|
||
wo of the Cumberland Plateau’s largest industry clusters — Manufacturin
|
||
. ; 8 . y oy ; 8 Professional, Scientific, & Technical l
|
||
and Tourism - suffer deep declines during recessions. The region’s major Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, & Hunting '
|
||
cluster — Mining — performs well during such events. Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation |
|
||
Support Activities for Mining I
|
||
Because a sector declines as a whole does not mean that all the components Management of Companies & Enterprises i
|
||
decline. For instance, outdoor tourism increased during the pandemic as Mining (except oil & gas) I
|
||
the overall industry decreased. Utilities a
|
||
Admin & Waste Management |
|
||
Traded clusters are an important consideration as they are the foundational Transportation & Warehousing a
|
||
base of a regional economy. It is impractical to abandon a base cluster Accommodation & Food Service |
|
||
solely based on its economic downturn performance. Other Services (except government) |
|
||
Retail Trade |
|
||
|
|
||
This cluster strategy takes all of this into consideration by blending a Manufacturing, non-durable goods —
|
||
portfolio of clusters to lessen the impacts of an economic downturn while Wholesale Trade a
|
||
. . Construction —
|
||
growing the economy in the long-term. }
|
||
Manufacturing, durable goods ——
|
||
Total
|
||
|
||
-12% -10% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4%
|
||
|
||
143
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
144
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC Blended Cluster Portfolio
|
||
Economic Downturn Impact
|
||
|
||
Mining Fabricated
|
||
Metal
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Shared Services
|
||
& IT
|
||
|
||
Machinery and
|
||
Equipment
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Tourism Healthcare
|
||
|
||
TRADED CLUSTERS LOCAL CLUSTERBLENDED CLUSTERS
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC Blended Cluster Portfolio
|
||
|
||
Economic Downturn Impact
|
||
|
||
te:
|
||
|
||
Tourism Healthcare
|
||
|
||
TRADED BLENDED CLUSTERS LOCAL CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
144
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
145
|
||
|
||
Cluster Strategies Overview
|
||
|
||
• Take advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for metal commodities.
|
||
|
||
• Bring together industry leaders, entrepreneurs and academics to address the mining
|
||
|
||
industry's most pressing challenges around efficiencies, future of the workforce, data
|
||
|
||
optimization and reducing carbon footprint.
|
||
|
||
• Promote the capabilities of existing mine supply, manufacturing and service businesses
|
||
|
||
via an online database to grow opportunities beyond the region.
|
||
|
||
Mining
|
||
|
||
Fabricated Metal Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
Shared Services & IT
|
||
|
||
Healthcare
|
||
|
||
Tourism
|
||
|
||
• Expand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase company presence in
|
||
|
||
the region.
|
||
|
||
• Investigate prototyping and short-run manufacturing capabilities to build local
|
||
|
||
manufacturing capacity for product customization.
|
||
|
||
• Pilot new technologies with local manufacturing companies in Industry 4.0 components
|
||
|
||
and/or partner with research institutions.
|
||
|
||
• Continue to explore BRE and industrial recruitment initiatives in high-growth sub-sectors
|
||
|
||
including batter storage and electrification.
|
||
|
||
• Assist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
• Develop Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing portfolio by promoting key skills and
|
||
|
||
inputs.
|
||
|
||
• Take advantage of existing inputs such as coal and fabricated metals to reinforce value
|
||
|
||
chain and offer streamlining to businesses from outside of the region.
|
||
|
||
• Capitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband capabilities to generate
|
||
|
||
growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
• Develop a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC based companies
|
||
|
||
through a “pipeline” to the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• With continued residential broadband deployment, train and support citizens working
|
||
|
||
from home.
|
||
|
||
• Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their
|
||
|
||
recession resiliency among tourism enterprises.
|
||
|
||
• Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV
|
||
|
||
parks and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to
|
||
|
||
current market demands.
|
||
|
||
• Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
|
||
such as agriculture and mining.
|
||
|
||
• Follow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an aging populace.
|
||
|
||
• Leverage Appalachian College of Pharmacy in recruiting on-line pharmacy operations
|
||
|
||
such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
|
||
• Conduct a healthcare leakage study to determine needed or improved services to ensure
|
||
|
||
income created in region stays in region.
|
||
|
||
Cluster Strategies Overview
|
||
|
||
— oe
|
||
wee
|
||
e Take advantage of value chain opportunities as demand grows for metal commodities.
|
||
e Bring together industry leaders, entrepreneurs and academics to address the mining
|
||
industry's most pressing challenges around efficiencies, future of the workforce, data
|
||
|
||
optimization and reducing carbon footprint.
|
||
|
||
e Promote the capabilities of existing mine supply, manufacturing and service businesses
|
||
via an online database to grow opportunities beyond the region.
|
||
|
||
‘e
|
||
|
||
“¥#”” Fabricated Metal Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
e Expand upon and market specialized knowledge base to increase company presence in
|
||
the region.
|
||
|
||
e Investigate prototyping and short-run manufacturing capabilities to build local
|
||
manufacturing capacity for product customization.
|
||
|
||
e Pilot new technologies with local manufacturing companies in Industry 4.0 components
|
||
and/or partner with research institutions.
|
||
|
||
e Continue to explore BRE and industrial recruitment initiatives in high-growth sub-sectors
|
||
including batter storage and electrification.
|
||
|
||
| Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing
|
||
|
||
e Assist in continued diversification of mining manufacturers into new clusters and markets.
|
||
|
||
e Develop Machinery & Equipment Manufacturing portfolio by promoting key skills and
|
||
inputs.
|
||
|
||
e Take advantage of existing inputs such as coal and fabricated metals to reinforce value
|
||
chain and offer streamlining to businesses from outside of the region.
|
||
|
||
145
|
||
|
||
Ry Shared Services & IT
|
||
|
||
e Capitalize on in-region expertise and best-in-class broadband capabilities to generate
|
||
growth through a remote-worker campaign.
|
||
|
||
e Develop a shared services program supporting Northern Virginia and DC based companies
|
||
through a “pipeline” to the Cumberland Plateau.
|
||
|
||
e With continued residential broadband deployment, train and support citizens working
|
||
|
||
from home.
|
||
7) > Tourism
|
||
\ e Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their
|
||
|
||
recession resiliency among tourism enterprises.
|
||
|
||
e Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV
|
||
parks and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to
|
||
current market demands.
|
||
|
||
e Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
such as agriculture and mining.
|
||
|
||
r AAs ) Healthcare
|
||
|
||
Ww e Follow current trajectory to capture revenue and meet the needs of an aging populace.
|
||
|
||
e Leverage Appalachian College of Pharmacy in recruiting on-line pharmacy operations
|
||
such as shared services and distribution.
|
||
|
||
e Conduct a healthcare leakage study to determine needed or improved services to ensure
|
||
income created in region stays in region.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
146
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure and Support Service
|
||
|
||
Strategies
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
Strategies
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure and Support Service
|
||
|
||
BSN
|
||
|
||
\\AAA \ceshaass dddid
|
||
|
||
n't
|
||
= ee aii
|
||
" 2 Owaltod aureret y= 4
|
||
|
||
— a LEN Rae oo
|
||
utter ee
|
||
|
||
VVVVUEETD TEs
|
||
|
||
Ail (23-323 AN Rs an
|
||
r. J Mell "| | |e EY
|
||
|
||
c. 1 UM | Eee ee be ee
|
||
|
||
; A ae ae whe
|
||
Sf) [,meeaeiai i434
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
147
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. Continue successful efforts to deploy broadband throughout the region; especially in residential areas to
|
||
|
||
support working from home opportunities. Broadband was the number one infrastructure answer from
|
||
|
||
government and community leaders for strengthening the region.
|
||
|
||
2. Develop a campaign or program to increase computer ownership and internet usage. While broadband
|
||
|
||
capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau, computer and internet usage are low.
|
||
|
||
3. Create a taskforce to address the region’s low worker participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of
|
||
|
||
63%), especially among females (38.6%). Disengaged residents are a source of labor that could
|
||
|
||
overcome current and future workforce needs.
|
||
|
||
4. Continue to develop larger industrial sites and shell buildings that could support a greater range of
|
||
|
||
industrial clients.
|
||
|
||
5. Based on stakeholder feedback from business leaders, more small business and entrepreneurial support
|
||
|
||
services are needed in the region.
|
||
|
||
Asset Mapping
|
||
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. Continue successful efforts to deploy broadband throughout the region; especially in residential areas to
|
||
support working from home opportunities. Broadband was the number one infrastructure answer from
|
||
government and community leaders for strengthening the region.
|
||
|
||
2. Develop a campaign or program to increase computer ownership and internet usage. While broadband
|
||
capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau, computer and internet usage are low.
|
||
|
||
3. Create a taskforce to address the region’s low worker participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of
|
||
63%), especially among females (38.6%). Disengaged residents are a source of labor that could
|
||
overcome current and future workforce needs.
|
||
|
||
4. Continue to develop larger industrial sites and shell buildings that could support a greater range of
|
||
industrial clients.
|
||
|
||
5. Based on stakeholder feedback from business leaders, more small business and entrepreneurial support
|
||
services are needed in the region.
|
||
|
||
147
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
148
|
||
|
||
Regional Assets
|
||
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Conversation and Recreation
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Activities & Natural Beauty
|
||
|
||
• Plentiful outdoor activities (driving, bicycling, hiking, fishing,
|
||
|
||
hunting, water sports, camping, etc.)
|
||
|
||
• 52 parks
|
||
|
||
• 49 natural areas
|
||
|
||
• 45 trails
|
||
|
||
• 43 scenic drives
|
||
|
||
• 37 historical areas
|
||
|
||
• 15 playing fields, sports, and golf facilitiesLow cost
|
||
|
||
• Low labor costs
|
||
|
||
• Low real estate costs
|
||
|
||
• Low cost of living
|
||
|
||
Broadband is a star asset in the region
|
||
|
||
• Broadband capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau’s broadband capabilities are not just
|
||
|
||
locally exceptional but rank highly when compared against the
|
||
|
||
entire nation.
|
||
|
||
• All four counties rank in the top one-third of the counties and
|
||
|
||
county equivalents across the U.S.
|
||
|
||
Regional Assets
|
||
|
||
Broadband is a star asset in the region Outdoor Activities & Natural Beauty
|
||
e Broadband capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland e Plentiful outdoor activities (driving, bicycling, hiking, fishing,
|
||
Plateau. hunting, water sports, camping, etc.)
|
||
e The Cumberland Plateau’s broadband capabilities are not just e 52 parks
|
||
locally exceptional but rank highly when compared against the e 49 natural areas
|
||
|
||
entire nation. e 45 trails
|
||
|
||
e All four counties rank in the top one-third of the counties and ° 43 scenic drives
|
||
|
||
county equivalents across the U.S. a
|
||
e 37 historical areas
|
||
|
||
Low cost
|
||
e Low labor costs
|
||
|
||
e 15 playing fields, sports, and golf facilities
|
||
|
||
e Low real estate costs
|
||
|
||
e Low cost of living
|
||
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Conversation and Recreation
|
||
|
||
148,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
149
|
||
|
||
Regional Deficiencies
|
||
|
||
• There are presently no commercial airports in the region making
|
||
|
||
accessibility challenging and increasing time costs. The nearest
|
||
|
||
commercial airport is the Tri-Cities Airport in Blountville, TN.
|
||
|
||
• There are no Interstate Highways in the region.
|
||
|
||
Deficiencies in the transportation Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
Elementary school performance and low
|
||
graduation from high-demand post-secondary
|
||
programs
|
||
|
||
Lower technology usage among households
|
||
|
||
Lack of human capital (labor & consumers)
|
||
|
||
• Two of the four regional school districts are low-performing. Students in
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County School District perform well below the state average
|
||
|
||
(63% below). Students in Russell County School District perform 11%
|
||
|
||
below the state average. The other two major school districts perform at
|
||
|
||
or above the state average.
|
||
|
||
• In addition to professional degree programs (pharmacy and law), nearby
|
||
|
||
Bluefield College serves the region. However, there is still a ‘brain drain’
|
||
|
||
of high-performing high school graduates as they leave the region looking
|
||
|
||
for higher educational institutions.
|
||
|
||
• Low completion numbers from high-demand, high-growth programs such
|
||
|
||
as computer science and business administration.
|
||
|
||
• While broadband capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau,
|
||
|
||
computer and internet usage are low, as evident by the lower percentage
|
||
|
||
of households that own a computer (72% vs. the U.S. average 77%) and
|
||
|
||
small percentage of households with a broadband subscription (47% vs.
|
||
|
||
69% U.S. average).
|
||
|
||
• The region’s low participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of 63%),
|
||
|
||
coupled with its small population, gives it a low labor force under 38,000
|
||
|
||
people. This will create challenges in drawing sizeable employers into the
|
||
|
||
region as many will believe that the region doesn’t have a sufficient
|
||
|
||
workforce to support their operations. Labor force participation is
|
||
|
||
particularly low among females (38.6%)
|
||
|
||
• At a rate less than half that of the national average and one-third of the
|
||
|
||
state average, the supply of university graduates is low in the Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau region. However, the supply of graduates from 2-year colleges is
|
||
|
||
slightly above average.
|
||
|
||
• The number of people in the region with less than a high school degree is
|
||
|
||
almost twice the U.S. average, indicating this should be a focal area for
|
||
|
||
economic development efforts.
|
||
|
||
Regional Deficiencies
|
||
|
||
LC Deficiencies in the transportation Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
mt
|
||
w
|
||
2a
|
||
|
||
e There are presently no commercial airports in the region making
|
||
accessibility challenging and increasing time costs. The nearest
|
||
commercial airport is the Tri-Cities Airport in Blountville, TN.
|
||
|
||
e There are no Interstate Highways in the region.
|
||
|
||
Elementary school performance and low
|
||
graduation from high-demand post-secondary
|
||
programs
|
||
|
||
e Two of the four regional school districts are low-performing. Students in
|
||
Buchanan County School District perform well below the state average
|
||
(63% below). Students in Russell County School District perform 11%
|
||
below the state average. The other two major school districts perform at
|
||
or above the state average.
|
||
|
||
e In addition to professional degree programs (pharmacy and law), nearby
|
||
Bluefield College serves the region. However, there is still a ‘brain drain’
|
||
of high-performing high school graduates as they leave the region looking
|
||
for higher educational institutions.
|
||
|
||
e Low completion numbers from high-demand, high-growth programs such
|
||
as computer science and business administration.
|
||
|
||
149
|
||
|
||
KN Lower technology usage among households
|
||
|
||
e While broadband capabilities are very strong in the Cumberland Plateau,
|
||
computer and internet usage are low, as evident by the lower percentage
|
||
of households that own a computer (72% vs. the U.S. average 77%) and
|
||
small percentage of households with a broadband subscription (47% vs.
|
||
69% U.S. average).
|
||
|
||
e
|
||
we Lack of human capital (labor & consumers)
|
||
|
||
e The region’s low participation rate (43% vs the U.S. average of 63%),
|
||
coupled with its small population, gives it a low labor force under 38,000
|
||
people. This will create challenges in drawing sizeable employers into the
|
||
region as many will believe that the region doesn’t have a sufficient
|
||
workforce to support their operations. Labor force participation is
|
||
particularly low among females (38.6%)
|
||
|
||
e Ata rate less than half that of the national average and one-third of the
|
||
state average, the supply of university graduates is low in the Cumberland
|
||
Plateau region. However, the supply of graduates from 2-year colleges is
|
||
slightly above average.
|
||
|
||
e The number of people in the region with less than a high school degree is
|
||
almost twice the U.S. average, indicating this should be a focal area for
|
||
economic development efforts.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
150
|
||
|
||
Business and Industrial Parks
|
||
Regional Assets & Deficiences
|
||
|
||
• Overall, the Cumberland Plateau region has done a good job
|
||
|
||
continuing to develop industrial parks.
|
||
|
||
• Industrial parks have good utility infrastructure in place or have
|
||
|
||
plans to do so.
|
||
|
||
• Although limited in marketability, having a shell building does
|
||
|
||
attract prospects to the region.
|
||
|
||
• The reuse of existing industrial buildings as “shell” buildings is a
|
||
|
||
good strategy.
|
||
|
||
Regional DeficienciesRegional Assets
|
||
|
||
• Although there are sites throughout the region, most are smaller
|
||
|
||
parcels limiting larger impact projects.
|
||
|
||
• The great majority of sites in region are over 30 minutes from an
|
||
|
||
interstate highway.
|
||
|
||
• Road access can be challenging for truck traffic.
|
||
|
||
• Current shell building has limited potential due to design.
|
||
|
||
Business and Industrial Parks
|
||
Regional Assets & Deficiences
|
||
|
||
Regional Assets Regional Deficiencies
|
||
|
||
e Overall, the Cumberland Plateau region has done a good job e Although there are sites throughout the region, most are smaller
|
||
continuing to develop industrial parks. parcels limiting larger impact projects.
|
||
|
||
e Industrial parks have good utility infrastructure in place or have ¢ The great majority of sites in region are over 30 minutes from an
|
||
plans to do so. interstate highway.
|
||
|
||
e Although limited in marketability, having a shell building does * Road access can be challenging for truck traffic.
|
||
attract prospects to the region. e Current shell building has limited potential due to design.
|
||
|
||
e The reuse of existing industrial buildings as “shell” buildings is a
|
||
|
||
good strategy.
|
||
|
||
150
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
100 MBPS
|
||
|
||
1 GBPS
|
||
|
||
151
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
Virginia’s broadband coverage is well distributed throughout the state, as 65% of
|
||
|
||
the state’s counties and independent cities have broadband coverage of 80% or
|
||
|
||
more. Cumberland Plateau is well positioned in this competitive environment: in
|
||
|
||
addition to Buchanan County’s best-in-class broadband coverage, Dickenson and
|
||
|
||
Tazewell perform above the state’s average and Tazewell’s 88.7% coverage is equal
|
||
|
||
to the state’s median. Outside of Southwestern Virginia, the state’s most connected
|
||
|
||
regions are largely concentrated along the eastern border.
|
||
|
||
AREA NATIONAL RANK
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County 8
|
||
|
||
Bristol 11
|
||
|
||
Franklin City 17
|
||
|
||
Bland County 23
|
||
|
||
Bedford City 24
|
||
|
||
Manassas Park 82
|
||
|
||
Lexington 89
|
||
|
||
Winchester 118
|
||
|
||
Covington 126
|
||
|
||
Radford 130
|
||
|
||
… …
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County 423
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County 611
|
||
|
||
Russell County 1,131
|
||
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow
|
||
|
||
TOP VIRGINIA COUNTIES/INDEPENDENT CITIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
Virginia’s broadband coverage is well distributed throughout the state, as 65% of TOP VIRGINIA COUNTIES/INDEPENDENT CITIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
the state’s counties and independent cities have broadband coverage of 80% or
|
||
|
||
more. Cumberland Plateau is well positioned in this competitive environment: in
|
||
|
||
addition to Buchanan County’s best-in-class broadband coverage, Dickenson and Buchanan County 8
|
||
|
||
Tazewell perform above the state’s average and Tazewell’s 88.7% coverage is equal Bristol ll
|
||
|
||
to the state’s median. Outside of Southwestern Virginia, the state’s most connected Franklin City 7
|
||
|
||
regions are largely concentrated along the eastern border. bland County 33
|
||
Bedford City 24
|
||
Manassas Park 82
|
||
Lexington 89
|
||
Winchester 118
|
||
|
||
100 MBPS Covington 126
|
||
|
||
Radford 130
|
||
Dickenson County 423
|
||
Tazewell County 611
|
||
|
||
Russell County 1,131
|
||
|
||
151
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
152
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
Broadband – National Overview
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau’s
|
||
|
||
broadband capabilities are not
|
||
|
||
just locally exceptional, but rank
|
||
|
||
highly when compared against
|
||
|
||
the entire nation. Buchanan
|
||
|
||
County’s rank of 8 is out of
|
||
|
||
3,143 total regions. Even the
|
||
|
||
lowest ranking county in the
|
||
|
||
region, Russell County, ranks
|
||
|
||
higher than two-thirds of the
|
||
|
||
counties and county equivalents
|
||
|
||
across the U.S.
|
||
|
||
NATIONAL RANK COUNTY STATE
|
||
|
||
1 Nassau New York
|
||
|
||
2 Richmond New York
|
||
|
||
3 Sullivan Tennessee
|
||
|
||
4 Whitfield Georgia
|
||
|
||
5 Bulloch Georgia
|
||
|
||
6 Hamblen Tennessee
|
||
|
||
7 Meade Kentucky
|
||
|
||
8 Buchanan Virginia
|
||
|
||
9 Morgan Tennessee
|
||
|
||
10 McCreary Kentucky
|
||
|
||
… … …
|
||
|
||
423 Dickenson Virginia
|
||
|
||
611 Tazewell Virginia
|
||
|
||
1,131 Russell Virginia
|
||
|
||
… … …
|
||
|
||
3,141 Esmeralda Nevada
|
||
|
||
3,142 Banner Nebraska
|
||
|
||
3,143 Yakutat Alaska
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow
|
||
|
||
TOTAL TOP COUNTIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure - Technology
|
||
Broadband — National Overview
|
||
|
||
The
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau’s
|
||
|
||
broadband capabilities are not
|
||
just locally exceptional, but rank
|
||
highly when compared against
|
||
the entire nation. Buchanan
|
||
County’s rank of 8 is out of
|
||
3,143 total regions. Even the
|
||
lowest ranking county in the
|
||
region, Russell County, ranks
|
||
higher than two-thirds of the
|
||
counties and county equivalents
|
||
across the U.S.
|
||
|
||
Source: BroadbandNow
|
||
|
||
TOTAL TOP COUNTIES FOR BROADBAND COVERAGE
|
||
|
||
NATIONAL RANK
|
||
|
||
Oo ON Do BW DY
|
||
|
||
an
|
||
[o)
|
||
|
||
423
|
||
611
|
||
1,131
|
||
|
||
3,141
|
||
3,142
|
||
3,143
|
||
|
||
COUNTY
|
||
|
||
Nassau
|
||
Richmond
|
||
Sullivan
|
||
Whitfield
|
||
Bulloch
|
||
Hamblen
|
||
Meade
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
Morgan
|
||
McCreary
|
||
|
||
Dickenson
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
|
||
Russell
|
||
|
||
Esmeralda
|
||
Banner
|
||
|
||
Yakutat
|
||
|
||
STATE
|
||
New York
|
||
New York
|
||
|
||
Tennessee
|
||
Georgia
|
||
Georgia
|
||
|
||
Tennessee
|
||
|
||
Kentucky
|
||
Virginia
|
||
Tennessee
|
||
|
||
Kentucky
|
||
|
||
Virginia
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Virginia
|
||
|
||
Nevada
|
||
|
||
Nebraska
|
||
Alaska
|
||
|
||
152
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
153
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Needed Infrastructure – Community Leaders Perspective
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or
|
||
|
||
support services are
|
||
|
||
needed to strengthen the
|
||
|
||
region?
|
||
|
||
• Passenger rail is another amenity I believe is overlooked. If we
|
||
|
||
are serious about recruiting remote workers, we need an
|
||
|
||
Amtrack station.
|
||
|
||
• Commuter air travel would help
|
||
|
||
• Road improvements
|
||
|
||
Transportation
|
||
• Broadband
|
||
|
||
• Broadband
|
||
|
||
• More Broadband
|
||
|
||
• Broadband good
|
||
|
||
• Continue broadband deployment
|
||
|
||
• Broadband
|
||
|
||
• Residential Broadband would be very helpful.
|
||
|
||
• High Speed Internet
|
||
|
||
• Trending up with internet.
|
||
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
• More sites and larger acre sites
|
||
|
||
• Shell buildings
|
||
|
||
• More sites
|
||
|
||
Sites & Buildings
|
||
|
||
• Natural gas
|
||
|
||
• More natural gas
|
||
|
||
• Really good trade schools in each area of our region.
|
||
|
||
• Wayfinding and signage to area attractions for people coming
|
||
|
||
through the area.
|
||
|
||
• Aging community- need for elderly support services.
|
||
|
||
• Support services for small businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Existing businesses need better support.
|
||
|
||
• Industry partnerships on bulk ordering.
|
||
|
||
• Need for shuttle services to local attractions
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Needed Infrastructure - Community Leaders Perspective
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or
|
||
support services are
|
||
needed to strengthen the
|
||
region?
|
||
|
||
Broadband
|
||
|
||
e Broadband
|
||
|
||
e Broadband
|
||
|
||
e More Broadband
|
||
|
||
e Broadband good
|
||
|
||
e Continue broadband deployment
|
||
|
||
e Broadband
|
||
|
||
e Residential Broadband would be very helpful.
|
||
e High Speed Internet
|
||
|
||
e Trending up with internet.
|
||
|
||
Sites & Buildings
|
||
|
||
e More sites and larger acre sites
|
||
|
||
e Shell buildings
|
||
|
||
e More sites
|
||
|
||
153
|
||
|
||
Transportation
|
||
|
||
e Passenger rail is another amenity | believe is overlooked. If we
|
||
are serious about recruiting remote workers, we need an
|
||
Amtrack station.
|
||
|
||
e¢ Commuter air travel would help
|
||
|
||
e Road improvements
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
e Natural gas
|
||
e More natural gas
|
||
e Really good trade schools in each area of our region.
|
||
|
||
e Wayfinding and signage to area attractions for people coming
|
||
through the area.
|
||
|
||
e Aging community- need for elderly support services.
|
||
e Support services for small businesses.
|
||
|
||
e Existing businesses need better support.
|
||
|
||
e Industry partnerships on bulk ordering.
|
||
|
||
e Need for shuttle services to local attractions
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
154
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Needed Infrastructure – Business Leaders Perspective
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or
|
||
|
||
support services are
|
||
|
||
needed to strengthen the
|
||
|
||
region?
|
||
|
||
• Entrepreneurial services for business start up.
|
||
|
||
• Entrepreneurial support services for people who are interested.
|
||
|
||
• Start up capital to assist entrepreneurs.
|
||
|
||
• Grant writing assistance for small business.
|
||
|
||
• Small business incubator type concept.
|
||
|
||
• Entrepreneurial support.
|
||
|
||
Entrepreneurship Support
|
||
|
||
• Better support for business for emergency events in the future.
|
||
|
||
• Central information source through the government for business
|
||
|
||
continuation.
|
||
|
||
• Post pandemic support for how to avoid closures in the future.
|
||
|
||
• Better centralization of business support offerings going forward to
|
||
|
||
assist locals interested in starting and keeping a business in the
|
||
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
• Better building support.
|
||
|
||
• Construction support for new businesses and buildings.
|
||
|
||
• Money allocated towards storefront beautification.
|
||
|
||
• Money towards assistance with staying in business.
|
||
|
||
Business Support
|
||
|
||
• Additional collective marketing needs.
|
||
|
||
• Social media marketing support because when social media has
|
||
|
||
been used, people have arrived directly citing it for visiting.
|
||
|
||
• More online regional promotion of area itineraries.
|
||
|
||
Marketing
|
||
|
||
• Better rail access (rail spur).
|
||
|
||
• Roads have improved but more work needed.
|
||
|
||
• Logistics hub in region.
|
||
|
||
• Better rail service.
|
||
|
||
• Better roads.
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
• Better trade education and funding.
|
||
|
||
• Education focus - PreK to Community College.
|
||
|
||
• Make UVA Wise more of a high-tech school.
|
||
|
||
• College trade school is improving but needs a lot of improvement,
|
||
|
||
needs more funding.
|
||
|
||
• Vocational education.
|
||
|
||
• More certified welders and laser equipment operators.
|
||
|
||
• Better soft skills training.
|
||
|
||
Education & Training
|
||
|
||
• Continuation of fiber broadband deployment.
|
||
|
||
• Better cell coverage on 460.
|
||
|
||
• More daycare options.
|
||
|
||
• Better hospital services
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Needed Infrastructure — Busin
|
||
|
||
What infrastructure or
|
||
support services are
|
||
needed to strengthen the
|
||
region?
|
||
|
||
ess Leaders Perspective
|
||
|
||
Business Support
|
||
|
||
e Better support for business for emergency events in the future.
|
||
|
||
e Central information source through the government for business
|
||
continuation.
|
||
|
||
e Post pandemic support for how to avoid closures in the future.
|
||
|
||
e Better centralization of business support offerings going forward to
|
||
assist locals interested in starting and keeping a business in the
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
e Better building support.
|
||
|
||
e Construction support for new businesses and buildings.
|
||
e Money allocated towards storefront beautification.
|
||
|
||
e Money towards assistance with staying in business.
|
||
|
||
Entrepreneurship Support
|
||
|
||
e Entrepreneurial services for business start up.
|
||
|
||
e Entrepreneurial support services for people who are interested.
|
||
e Start up capital to assist entrepreneurs.
|
||
|
||
e Grant writing assistance for small business.
|
||
|
||
e Small business incubator type concept.
|
||
|
||
e Entrepreneurial support.
|
||
|
||
Marketing 00
|
||
|
||
e Additional collective marketing needs.
|
||
|
||
e Social media marketing support because when social media has
|
||
been used, people have arrived directly citing it for visiting.
|
||
|
||
e More online regional promotion of area itineraries.
|
||
|
||
154
|
||
|
||
Education & Training
|
||
|
||
e Better trade education and funding.
|
||
|
||
e Education focus - PreK to Community College.
|
||
e Make UVA Wise more of a high-tech school.
|
||
|
||
© College trade school is improving but needs a lot of improvement,
|
||
needs more funding.
|
||
|
||
e Vocational education.
|
||
e More certified welders and laser equipment operators.
|
||
e Better soft skills training.
|
||
|
||
Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
e Better rail access (rail spur).
|
||
|
||
e Roads have improved but more work needed.
|
||
e Logistics hub in region.
|
||
|
||
e Better rail service.
|
||
|
||
e Better roads.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
¢ Continuation of fiber broadband deployment.
|
||
e Better cell coverage on 460.
|
||
e More daycare options.
|
||
|
||
e Better hospital services
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
155
|
||
|
||
Recommendations and Resources to
|
||
|
||
Support Existing Businesses
|
||
|
||
IEDC &
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org
|
||
Review
|
||
|
||
IEDC &
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org \
|
||
Review
|
||
|
||
Recommendations and Resources to
|
||
|
||
Support Existing Businesses
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
156
|
||
|
||
Resource Source
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
Regarding resiliency, the main economic
|
||
|
||
development resource is
|
||
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org. This section
|
||
|
||
uses the International Economic
|
||
|
||
Development Council’s work on disaster
|
||
|
||
recovery and their joint website with the
|
||
|
||
U.S. Economic Development
|
||
|
||
Administration - RestoreYourEconomy.org
|
||
|
||
as a basis for recommendations.
|
||
|
||
Resource Source
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org
|
||
|
||
Regarding resiliency, the main economic RESTORE YOUR ECONOMY ABOUT PREPAREDNESS & RECOVERY RESOURCES COVID-19 VOLUNTEER CONTACT
|
||
development resource is
|
||
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy.org. This section
|
||
RESTORE YOUR
|
||
|
||
uses the International Economic es
|
||
|
||
Development Council’s work on disaster ECO N 0 MY=
|
||
|
||
recovery and their joint website with the ee ta / ae
|
||
|
||
U.S. Economic Development ECON y COVI D-1 9
|
||
|
||
Administration - RestoreYourEconomy.org
|
||
|
||
. . RESOURCES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
|
||
as a basis for recommendations. 4 eau
|
||
|
||
COVID-19 Webinars
|
||
|
||
RestoreYourEconomy is your resource for up-to-date information related to COVID-19 and its economic impacts. It
|
||
|
||
D is managed by the International Economic Development Council (IEDC) with generous support from the U.S.
|
||
—~— EDRP Briefs Economic Development Administration and IEDC's Economic Development Research Partners program.
|
||
|
||
If you have a resource or example of an effective strategy in your community that would be helpful to other EDOs in
|
||
Addressing Inequality responding to COVID-19, let us know using the Contact Form to share your story.
|
||
|
||
Reopening Your Economy
|
||
Reopening by Industry
|
||
State, and Municipal Reopening
|
||
|
||
Research and Resources
|
||
SEPTEMBER 15, 2020
|
||
|
||
LAYING THE GROUNDWORK FOR
|
||
TOURISM RECOVERY IN URBAN CENTERS
|
||
|
||
156
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
157
|
||
|
||
Business Retention and Expansion (BRE)
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
Using a BRE program to prepare companies in the region for a disaster or economic downturn and then
|
||
support them during recovery is a key resiliency strategy for the community. BRE strategies enhance
|
||
capacity for recovery and strengthen existing business networks. The region should support their local
|
||
economic developers is in implementing these strategies:
|
||
|
||
1. Encourage businesses to develop business continuity plans by providing workshops to small and midsized
|
||
|
||
firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
2. Encourage businesses to develop business preparedness plans by providing workshops to small and
|
||
|
||
midsized firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
3. Support each county in developing its own economic planning and recovery team using engaged business
|
||
|
||
leaders (see guidance on building a team).
|
||
|
||
4. Establish a business recovery fund so there is an immediate and locally-controlled source of financial
|
||
|
||
support for existing businesses.
|
||
|
||
5. Establish plans with local utilities and emergency management authorities to facilitate the prioritization of
|
||
|
||
utilities to key business parks and industries.
|
||
|
||
6. Include local economic developers on the county emergency management teams.
|
||
|
||
7. Encourage local economic developers to develop their own preparedness and continuity plans to create a
|
||
|
||
capacity to support businesses in an economic crisis.
|
||
|
||
Business Retention and Expansion (BRE)
|
||
Recommendations
|
||
|
||
Using a BRE program to prepare companies in the region for a disaster or economic downturn and then
|
||
support them during recovery is a key resiliency strategy for the community. BRE strategies enhance
|
||
capacity for recovery and strengthen existing business networks. The region should support their local
|
||
economic developers is in implementing these strategies:
|
||
|
||
1. Encourage businesses to develop business continuity plans by providing workshops to small and midsized
|
||
firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
2. Encourage businesses to develop business preparedness plans by providing workshops to small and
|
||
midsized firms (see following page).
|
||
|
||
3. Support each county in developing its own economic planning and recovery team using engaged business
|
||
leaders (see guidance on building a team).
|
||
|
||
4. Establish a business recovery fund so there is an immediate and locally-controlled source of financial
|
||
support for existing businesses.
|
||
|
||
5. Establish plans with local utilities and emergency management authorities to facilitate the prioritization of
|
||
utilities to key business parks and industries.
|
||
|
||
6. Include local economic developers on the county emergency management teams.
|
||
|
||
7. Encourage local economic developers to develop their own preparedness and continuity plans to create a
|
||
capacity to support businesses in an economic crisis.
|
||
|
||
157
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
158
|
||
|
||
Resource Tools
|
||
Business Continuity and Business
|
||
|
||
Preparedness Tools
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
The Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS)
|
||
|
||
Provides two free useful tools for small businesses, one focused on business continuity, the other on
|
||
business preparedness. Having both an emergency preparedness and response plan as well as a
|
||
business continuity plan in place saves time and focuses energy during emergency situations. By
|
||
taking this action, business owners will help make their communities more resilient, while also
|
||
protecting their employees and their business’ bottom line. Open For Business-EZ (OFB-EZ) is a
|
||
streamlined kit for small businesses that may not have the time or resources to create an extensive
|
||
disaster recovery plan. In addition, there is a free OFB-EZ mobile app to complete the same tasks as
|
||
the toolkit.
|
||
|
||
Business Continuity and Preparedness Training for Small Businesses
|
||
|
||
Small- and medium-sized businesses have strong roots in the local economy and are often more
|
||
vulnerable to disasters than large businesses. Consider the following statistics from IBHS and SBA:
|
||
one in four small businesses are expected to experience a disruptive disaster in the near future –
|
||
regardless of their location in the country. Approximately 60 percent of those small businesses do not
|
||
have even a basic emergency response plan. Of those businesses without a plan, 43 percent won’t
|
||
reopen their doors and 75 percent will fail within three years of a major incident. EDO’s should
|
||
consider hosting workshops and/or webinars to increase awareness of available resources.
|
||
|
||
https://disastersafety.org/busines
|
||
|
||
s-protection/ofb-ez/
|
||
|
||
Resource Tools
|
||
|
||
Business Continuity and Business
|
||
|
||
Preparedness Tools
|
||
|
||
https://disastersafety.org/busines
|
||
s-protection/ofb-ez/
|
||
|
||
The Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS)
|
||
|
||
Provides two free useful tools for small businesses, one focused on business continuity, the other on
|
||
business preparedness. Having both an emergency preparedness and response plan as well as a
|
||
business continuity plan in place saves time and focuses energy during emergency situations. By
|
||
aking this action, business owners will help make their communities more resilient, while also
|
||
protecting their employees and their business’ bottom line. Open For Business-EZ (OFB-EZ) is a
|
||
streamlined kit for small businesses that may not have the time or resources to create an extensive
|
||
disaster recovery plan. In addition, there is a free OFB-EZ mobile app to complete the same tasks as
|
||
he toolkit.
|
||
|
||
Business Continuity and Preparedness Training for Small Businesses
|
||
|
||
Small- and medium-sized businesses have strong roots in the local economy and are often more
|
||
vulnerable to disasters than large businesses. Consider the following statistics from IBHS and SBA:
|
||
one in four small businesses are expected to experience a disruptive disaster in the near future —
|
||
regardless of their location in the country. Approximately 60 percent of those small businesses do not
|
||
have even a basic emergency response plan. Of those businesses without a plan, 43 percent won’t
|
||
reopen their doors and 75 percent will fail within three years of a major incident. EDO’s should
|
||
consider hosting workshops and/or webinars to increase awareness of available resources.
|
||
|
||
158
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
159
|
||
|
||
Resource Team
|
||
Build an Economic
|
||
|
||
Response/Recovery Team
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
Involving the business community in the disaster preparation process at an early stage will help to ensure their
|
||
|
||
specific needs are addressed in emergency plans and increase their resilience to the disaster’s impact. Business
|
||
|
||
owners and executives don’t naturally see their role in a community’s disaster preparedness effort, so the EDO plays
|
||
|
||
an important role in conveying these understandings. While local government has the legal responsibility to address
|
||
|
||
disaster risks and make emergency management plans, businesses and the business community will recover much
|
||
|
||
more effectively from a disaster if they have taken preparedness steps tailored to business needs.
|
||
|
||
An EDO should particularly engage those businesses that may have important resources for response and recovery.
|
||
|
||
It is recommended that an economic recovery team be formed ahead of a disaster to specifically address the post-
|
||
|
||
disaster economic recovery issues that a community may face. This economic recovery team would also play a role
|
||
|
||
in working with emergency management personnel to influence a tiered system of reentry for critical businesses that
|
||
|
||
need early access back in the community following a disaster.
|
||
|
||
The economic recovery team’s first initiative should be reviewing the community’s existing emergency management
|
||
|
||
and mitigation plans with a focus on the plans’ impact on the business community and the local economy. Most
|
||
|
||
emergency management plans are primarily concerned with health and public safety issues and may overlook the
|
||
|
||
economic recovery aspect. These plans discuss business reentry, access to property, and other issues that impact
|
||
|
||
local businesses’ ability to respond and recover.
|
||
|
||
Resource Team
|
||
Build an Economic
|
||
Response/Recovery Team
|
||
|
||
Involving the business community in the disaster preparation process at an early stage will help to ensure their
|
||
specific needs are addressed in emergency plans and increase their resilience to the disaster’s impact. Business
|
||
owners and executives don’t naturally see their role in a community’s disaster preparedness effort, so the EDO plays
|
||
an important role in conveying these understandings. While local government has the legal responsibility to address
|
||
disaster risks and make emergency management plans, businesses and the business community will recover much
|
||
more effectively from a disaster if they have taken preparedness steps tailored to business needs.
|
||
|
||
An EDO should particularly engage those businesses that may have important resources for response and recovery.
|
||
It is recommended that an economic recovery team be formed ahead of a disaster to specifically address the post-
|
||
disaster economic recovery issues that a community may face. This economic recovery team would also play a role
|
||
in working with emergency management personnel to influence a tiered system of reentry for critical businesses that
|
||
need early access back in the community following a disaster.
|
||
|
||
The economic recovery team’s first initiative should be reviewing the community’s existing emergency management
|
||
and mitigation plans with a focus on the plans’ impact on the business community and the local economy. Most
|
||
emergency management plans are primarily concerned with health and public safety issues and may overlook the
|
||
economic recovery aspect. These plans discuss business reentry, access to property, and other issues that impact
|
||
local businesses’ ability to respond and recover.
|
||
|
||
159
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
Tourism Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
August 2021
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC
|
||
|
||
Tourism Resiliency Strategy
|
||
|
||
August 2021
|
||
|
||
HICKEYGLOBAL
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
161
|
||
|
||
Key Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. Because the area’s tourism industry is still developing, tourist needs should be aligned with
|
||
|
||
resident needs. Any development for tourism will need to also be supported by local residents and
|
||
|
||
should benefit both groups equally.
|
||
|
||
2. A focus on outdoor recreation tourism benefits the region by appealing to remote workers and
|
||
|
||
resident quality of life. Outdoor recreation benefits residents as much as tourists especially in a
|
||
|
||
pandemic environment.
|
||
|
||
3. Key, activity-based opportunity zones need to be identified for different facets of outdoor recreation
|
||
|
||
tourism to assure visitor services align with visitor activity to reduce leakage and create a tourism
|
||
|
||
ecosystem.
|
||
|
||
4. A pandemic response board should be established for tourism from subject matter experts and
|
||
|
||
industry representatives to ensure a consistent regional approach and smooth information flow.
|
||
|
||
5. Major tourism asset development should be leveraged to bring areas up to a standard of readiness
|
||
|
||
and maintain that standard to ensure areas seeking to increase their tourism market are putting
|
||
|
||
forward a welcoming environment with sufficient visitor services.
|
||
|
||
Key Recommendations
|
||
|
||
1. Because the area’s tourism industry is still developing, tourist needs should be aligned with
|
||
resident needs. Any development for tourism will need to also be supported by local residents and
|
||
should benefit both groups equally.
|
||
|
||
2. A focus on outdoor recreation tourism benefits the region by appealing to remote workers and
|
||
resident quality of life. Outdoor recreation benefits residents as much as tourists especially in a
|
||
pandemic environment.
|
||
|
||
3. Key, activity-based opportunity zones need to be identified for different facets of outdoor recreation
|
||
tourism to assure visitor services align with visitor activity to reduce leakage and create a tourism
|
||
ecosystem.
|
||
|
||
4. A pandemic response board should be established for tourism from subject matter experts and
|
||
industry representatives to ensure a consistent regional approach and smooth information flow.
|
||
|
||
5. Major tourism asset development should be leveraged to bring areas up to a standard of readiness
|
||
and maintain that standard to ensure areas seeking to increase their tourism market are putting
|
||
forward a welcoming environment with sufficient visitor services.
|
||
|
||
161
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
1.0 Improving Quality of Existing
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Jobs
|
||
|
||
1.0 Improving Quality of Existing ——~ She,
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Jobs
|
||
|
||
HICKEYGLOBAL
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
163
|
||
|
||
1.1 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
Quality of Outdoor Recreation jobs is lower compared with
|
||
|
||
most tourism jobs due to seasonality of the region with most
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation opportunities available only during summer
|
||
|
||
and shoulder seasons of Spring and Fall making full time work
|
||
|
||
rare. There does not appear to be any current opportunities to
|
||
|
||
engage in winter outdoor recreation given the landscape and
|
||
|
||
natural resources of the area. This could be an area for future
|
||
|
||
study or planning to increase winter season activity offerings.
|
||
|
||
Current year-round offerings are ATV/UTV trails, but the
|
||
|
||
associated accommodations with these trails are largely
|
||
|
||
camping based which impacts seasonality.
|
||
|
||
ORSA reports 3.1% value added growth in outdoor recreation
|
||
|
||
for Virginia pre-pandemic, a .5% decrease in employment
|
||
|
||
growth, and a 2.8% compensation growth which was below
|
||
|
||
the national average of 3.9%. This does not relate to Virginia's
|
||
|
||
lack of outdoor recreation opportunities as the latest VTC 2021
|
||
|
||
Marketing Plan indicates that Virginia is best known for history,
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation, scenic drives, and beaches. The outdoor
|
||
|
||
recreation job market in the state is simply not keeping pace
|
||
|
||
with compensation growth or added jobs compared with other
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation areas.
|
||
|
||
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2019). Outdoor Recreation Satellite Account, Virginia.
|
||
|
||
VTC. (2021). 2021 Marketing Plan.
|
||
|
||
Quality of Outdoor Recreation jobs is lower compared with
|
||
most tourism jobs due to seasonality of the region with most
|
||
outdoor recreation opportunities available only during summer
|
||
and shoulder seasons of Spring and Fall making full time work
|
||
rare. There does not appear to be any current opportunities to
|
||
engage in winter outdoor recreation given the landscape and
|
||
natural resources of the area. This could be an area for future
|
||
study or planning to increase winter season activity offerings.
|
||
Current year-round offerings are ATV/UTV trails, but the
|
||
associated accommodations with these trails are largely
|
||
camping based which impacts seasonality.
|
||
|
||
1.1 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
ORSA reports 3.1% value added growth in outdoor recreation
|
||
for Virginia pre-pandemic, a .5% decrease in employment
|
||
growth, and a 2.8% compensation growth which was below
|
||
the national average of 3.9%. This does not relate to Virginia's
|
||
lack of outdoor recreation opportunities as the latest VTC 2021
|
||
Marketing Plan indicates that Virginia is best known for history,
|
||
outdoor recreation, scenic drives, and beaches. The outdoor
|
||
recreation job market in the state is simply not keeping pace
|
||
with compensation growth or added jobs compared with other
|
||
outdoor recreation areas.
|
||
|
||
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2019). Outdoor Recreation Satellite Account, Virginia.
|
||
VTC. (2021). 2021 Marketing Plan
|
||
|
||
163
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
164
|
||
|
||
1.2 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
However, outdoor recreation related or supporting fields cause excellent economic multipliers when tourists are spending money
|
||
|
||
in areas with outdoor recreation opportunities. This table from the Outdoor Industry Association indicates annual spend for
|
||
|
||
different Outdoor Recreation Activities along with their total economic impact:
|
||
|
||
Source: Outdoor Industry Association. (2017). The Outdoor Recreation Economy. p. 18
|
||
|
||
AMERICANS PARTICIPATING IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ANNUALLY SPEND
|
||
|
||
Gear, Accessories &
|
||
Vehicles
|
||
|
||
Trip Related TOTAL
|
||
|
||
Camping $31,271,155,486 $135,591,624,999 $166,862,780,485
|
||
|
||
Fishing $11,867,666,850 $23,908,160,290 $35,775,827,140
|
||
|
||
Hunting $16,059,527,274 $11,318,772,808 $27,378,300,882
|
||
|
||
Motorcycle Riding $16,726,560,701 $47,428,610,964 $64,155,171,665
|
||
|
||
Off Roading $15,520,574,134 $35,996,107,969 $51,516,682,103
|
||
|
||
Snow Sports $12,530,315,740 $60,190,242,316 $72,720,558,056
|
||
|
||
Trail Sports $25,342,546,672 $176,144,141,213 $201,486,687,885
|
||
|
||
Water Sports $29,059,965,205 $110,911,844,967 $139,971,810,172
|
||
|
||
Wheel Sports $13,857,894,195 $82,864,146,456 $96,722,040,651
|
||
|
||
Wildlife Watching $12,272,757,581 $17,947,854,866 $30,220,612,447
|
||
|
||
TOTAL $184,508,963,838 $702,301,506,848 $886,810,470,686
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL OUTDOOR RECREATION SPENDING DIRECTLY GENERATES
|
||
|
||
Retail Spending Jobs
|
||
Salaries &
|
||
|
||
Wages
|
||
Federal Taxes
|
||
|
||
State & Local
|
||
Taxes
|
||
|
||
Camping $166,862,780,485 1,442,578 $50,684,882,121 $12,354,788,124 $11,183,227,292
|
||
|
||
Fishing $35,775,827,140 287,554 $10,395,326,785 $2,540,632,232 $2,360,293,823
|
||
|
||
Hunting $27,378,300,082 194,973 $7,415,989,907 $1,807,179,525 $1,689,967,918
|
||
|
||
Motorcycle Riding $64,155,171,665 480,182 $18,370,693,658 $4,549,055,289 $4,013,340,008
|
||
|
||
Off Roading $51,516,682,103 386,439 $15,498,769,234 $3,789,720,978 $3,338,430,860
|
||
|
||
Snow Sports $72,720,558,056 694,918 $24,188,497,260 $5,813,068,034 $5,296,608,281
|
||
|
||
Trail Sports $201,486,687,885 1,762,665 $607,191,555,234 $14,832,760,478 $13,505,790,914
|
||
|
||
Water Sports $139,970,810,172 1,234,876 $43,893,049,709 $10,618,742,884 $9,601,521,150
|
||
|
||
Wheel Sports $96,722,040,651 847,559 $28,543,151,818 $7,000,352,726 $6,270,032,370
|
||
|
||
Wildlife Watching $30,220,612,447 235,825 $8,206,004,990 $2,006,001,464 $1,953,449,823
|
||
|
||
TOTAL $886,810,470,686 75,675,690 $267,915,429,616 $65,312,301,734 $59,212,662,439
|
||
|
||
|.2 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
However, outdoor recreation related or supporting fields cause excellent economic multipliers when tourists are spending money
|
||
in areas with outdoor recreation opportunities. This table from the Outdoor Industry Association indicates annual spend for
|
||
different Outdoor Recreation Activities along with their total economic impact:
|
||
|
||
AMERICANS PARTICIPATING IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ANNUALLY SPEND ANNUAL OUTDOOR RECREATION SPENDING DIRECTLY GENERATES
|
||
Gear, vonaee® & Trip Related TOTAL Retail Spending Jobs Salaries & Federal Taxes State & Local
|
||
ehicles Wages Taxes
|
||
|
||
Camping $31,271,155,486 $135,591,624,999 $166,862,780,485 Camping $166,862,780,485 1,442,578 $50,684,882,121 | $12,354,788,124 | $11,183,227,292
|
||
Fishing $11,867,666,850 $23,908,160,290 $35,775,827,140 Fishing $35,775,827,140 287,554 $10,395,326,785 | $2,540,632,232 | $2,360,293,823
|
||
Hunting $16,059,527,274 $11,318,772,808 $27,378,300,882 Hunting $27,378,300,082 194,973 $7,415,989,907 | $1,807,179,525 | $1,689,967,918
|
||
Motorcycle Riding $16,726,560,701 $47,428,610,964 $64,155,171,665 Motorcycle Riding $64,155,171,665 480,182 $18,370,693,658 | $4,549,055,289 | $4,013,340,008
|
||
Off Roading $15,520,574,134 $35,996, 107,969 $51,516,682,103 Off Roading $51,516,682,103 386,439 $15,498,769,234 | $3,789,720,978 | $3,338,430,860
|
||
Snow Sports $12,530,315,740 $60,190,242,316 $72,720,558,056 Snow Sports $72,720,558,056 694,918 $24,188,497,260 | $5,813,068,034 | $5,296,608,281
|
||
Trail Sports $25,342,546,672 $176,144,141,213 $201,486,687,885 Trail Sports $201,486,687,885 1,762,665 $607,191,555,234 | $14,832,760,478 | $13,505,790,914
|
||
Water Sports $29,059,965,205 $110,911,844,967 $139,971,810,172 Water Sports $139,970,810,172 1,234,876 $43,893,049,709 | $10,618,742,884 | $9,601,521,150
|
||
Wheel Sports $13,857,894,195 $82,864,146,456 $96,722,040,651 Wheel Sports $96,722,040,651 847,559 $28,543,151,818 | $7,000,352,726 | $6,270,032,370
|
||
Wildlife Watching $12,272,757,581 $17,947,854,866 $30,220,612,447 Wildlife Watching $30,220,612,447 235,825 $8,206,004,990 | $2,006,001,464 | $1,953,449,823
|
||
|
||
$184,508,963,838 $702,301,506,848 $886,810,470,686 $886,810,470,686 75,675,690 $267,915,429,616 $65,312,301,734 $59,212,662,439
|
||
|
||
Source: Outdoor Industry Association. (2017). The Outdoor Recreation Economy. p. 18
|
||
|
||
164
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
165
|
||
|
||
1.3 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau is best situated to
|
||
|
||
invest and specialize in the following
|
||
|
||
segments:
|
||
|
||
1. Camping
|
||
|
||
2. Trail Sports
|
||
|
||
3. Water Sports
|
||
|
||
4. Wheel Sports (Cycling)
|
||
|
||
5. Motorcycle Riding
|
||
|
||
6. Off-Roading
|
||
|
||
The primary focus should be on providing opportunities
|
||
|
||
to spend money while participating in these sports and
|
||
|
||
building high-specialty jobs around these sports to
|
||
|
||
ensure their continuation. Capturing more of the
|
||
|
||
tourism dollar to minimize leakage by assuring
|
||
|
||
appropriate visitor services are available through
|
||
|
||
locally owned, small businesses at major tourist
|
||
|
||
attractions.
|
||
|
||
1.3 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau is best situated to The primary focus should be on providing opportunities
|
||
invest and specialize in the following to spend money while participating in these sports and
|
||
segments: building high-specialty jobs around these sports to
|
||
. ensure their continuation. Capturing more of the
|
||
1. Camping } _ ;
|
||
tourism dollar to minimize leakage by assuring
|
||
2. Trail Sports appropriate visitor services are available through
|
||
3. Water Sports locally owned, small businesses at major tourist
|
||
attractions.
|
||
4. Wheel Sports (Cycling)
|
||
5. Motorcycle Riding
|
||
6. Off-Roading
|
||
|
||
165
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
166
|
||
|
||
1.4 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
In a pandemic environment, outdoor recreation saw the
|
||
|
||
lowest downturn impact among recreation-based segments
|
||
|
||
making it a better tourism employment opportunity than most
|
||
|
||
tourism jobs given this context.
|
||
|
||
In the pandemic environment, VTC found that 70% of
|
||
|
||
travelers wanted to be outdoors and experience nature on
|
||
|
||
their next trip. 83% are selecting a destination based on rest
|
||
|
||
and relaxation activities which was rated as most important
|
||
|
||
destination attribute in selecting where to go.
|
||
|
||
The market demand is sufficient to bolster outdoor
|
||
|
||
recreation job quantity, but the quality of the jobs available in
|
||
|
||
this category will be dependent on year-round related
|
||
|
||
opportunities and quality assurance roles which can provide
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation experiences without actual outdoor sport
|
||
|
||
participation. Cluster study analysis reveals agriculture and
|
||
|
||
mining as two high potential industries within the area that
|
||
|
||
could be tied into tourism initiatives in order to improve
|
||
|
||
tourism resiliency. Outdoor recreation jobs could increase in
|
||
|
||
quality by developing some opportunities around mining
|
||
|
||
tourism and agritourism enterprises.
|
||
|
||
|.4 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Recreation Job Quality
|
||
|
||
n a pandemic environment, outdoor recreation saw the
|
||
owest downturn impact among recreation-based segments
|
||
|
||
making it a better tourism employment opportunity than most
|
||
ourism jobs given this context.
|
||
|
||
n the pandemic environment, VTC found that 70% of
|
||
ravelers wanted to be outdoors and experience nature on
|
||
heir next trip. 83% are selecting a destination based on rest
|
||
and relaxation activities which was rated as most important
|
||
destination attribute in selecting where to go.
|
||
|
||
166
|
||
|
||
The market demand is sufficient to bolster outdoor
|
||
recreation job quantity, but the quality of the jobs available in
|
||
this category will be dependent on year-round related
|
||
opportunities and quality assurance roles which can provide
|
||
outdoor recreation experiences without actual outdoor sport
|
||
participation. Cluster study analysis reveals agriculture and
|
||
mining as two high potential industries within the area that
|
||
could be tied into tourism initiatives in order to improve
|
||
tourism resiliency. Outdoor recreation jobs could increase in
|
||
quality by developing some opportunities around mining
|
||
tourism and agritourism enterprises.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
167
|
||
|
||
1.5 Tourism - Cluster Overview
|
||
Restaurants, RV Parks, Hotels, and
|
||
|
||
Recreational Centers
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
• Cumberland Plateau’s Tourism is largely based on natural attractions such as state parks
|
||
|
||
and forests.
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants make up the largest portion of the region’s Tourism-related workforce with over
|
||
|
||
1,800 employees.
|
||
|
||
• Despite few employees in traditional hotels, Cumberland Plateau has a high location quotient
|
||
|
||
for RV Parks and Campgrounds, a growing industry that will benefit from the development of
|
||
|
||
the Clinch River State Park.
|
||
|
||
Build infrastructure to support interest created by national trends
|
||
in natural resources and eco-tourism.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
• Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their recession
|
||
|
||
resiliency among tourism enterprises and strong natural assets.
|
||
|
||
• Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV parks
|
||
|
||
and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to current market
|
||
|
||
demands.
|
||
|
||
• Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
|
||
such as agriculture and mining.
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
TOTAL U.S. TOURISM-RELATED OUTPUT IN 2016-2019
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
||
|
||
Billions of
|
||
|
||
current dollars
|
||
|
||
Direct
|
||
|
||
Indirect
|
||
|
||
Total
|
||
|
||
1.5 Tourism - Cluster Overview
|
||
Restaurants, RV Parks, Hotels, and
|
||
|
||
Recreational Centers
|
||
Build infrastructure to support interest created by national trends
|
||
|
||
in natural resources and eco-tourism.
|
||
|
||
CASE TO WIN
|
||
|
||
* Cumberland Plateau’s Tourism is largely based on natural attractions such as state parks
|
||
and forests.
|
||
|
||
» Restaurants make up the largest portion of the region’s Tourism-related workforce with over
|
||
1,800 employees.
|
||
|
||
* Despite few employees in traditional hotels, Cumberland Plateau has a high location quotient
|
||
for RV Parks and Campgrounds, a growing industry that will benefit from the development of
|
||
the Clinch River State Park.
|
||
|
||
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES
|
||
|
||
* Continue to expand tourist access to outdoor recreation opportunities due to their recession
|
||
resiliency among tourism enterprises and strong natural assets.
|
||
|
||
* Develop a mixed accommodations industry with more traditional hotels alongside RV parks
|
||
and campgrounds which are experiencing high levels of growth in response to current market
|
||
demands.
|
||
|
||
+ Increase tourism resiliency by tying in with other industries in which the region does well
|
||
such as agriculture and mining.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
||
|
||
CLUSTER INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
ays e@ Direct
|
||
Billions of
|
||
current dollars @ Indirect
|
||
TOTAL U.S. TOURISM-RELATED OUTPUT !N 2016-2019 © Total
|
||
$2,000 ;—
|
||
|
||
$1,500
|
||
|
||
$1,000
|
||
: | | | |
|
||
|
||
$0
|
||
2016 2017 2018 2019
|
||
|
||
167
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
168
|
||
|
||
1.6 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
|
||
Traded Industry
|
||
|
||
Local Industry
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
Total Employment within
|
||
|
||
Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
100 Employees
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
• Currently, tourism infrastructure
|
||
|
||
industries such as hotels and
|
||
|
||
full-service restaurants do not
|
||
|
||
have a high employment
|
||
|
||
concentration in Cumberland
|
||
|
||
Plateau.
|
||
|
||
• Limited-Service Restaurants is
|
||
|
||
the largest industry by
|
||
|
||
employment within the Tourism
|
||
|
||
sector with a location quotient of
|
||
|
||
1.5.
|
||
|
||
• Although the RV Parks and
|
||
|
||
Campgrounds industry does not
|
||
|
||
require large scale employment
|
||
|
||
for operations, the region is
|
||
|
||
relatively advantaged with both a
|
||
|
||
high growth rate and location
|
||
|
||
quotient.
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
O
|
||
J
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
D
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
.A
|
||
|
||
.G
|
||
.R
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
1 = U.S. AVERAGE
|
||
|
||
1.6 Cumberland Plateau Cluster Study
|
||
|
||
15%
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
|
||
* Currently, tourism infrastructure
|
||
11% industries such as hotels and
|
||
full-service restaurants do not
|
||
have a high employment
|
||
concentration in Cumberland
|
||
|
||
8%
|
||
Plateau.
|
||
a + Limited-Service Restaurants is
|
||
s 4% the largest industry by
|
||
g employment within the Tourism
|
||
» sector with a location quotient of
|
||
9 0% @°e 6
|
||
° © © i + Although the RV Parks and
|
||
5 © e Campgrounds industry does not
|
||
uw 4% Traded Industry require large scale employment
|
||
9 for operations, the region is
|
||
a { ) relatively advantaged with both a
|
||
; Local Industry high growth rate and location
|
||
-8% quotient.
|
||
|
||
Blended Industry
|
||
|
||
9
|
||
11% e
|
||
100 Employees
|
||
°
|
||
¢ Note: Dot Size represents
|
||
5 Total Employment within
|
||
-15% Occupation Group
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5
|
||
|
||
LOCATION QUOTIENT
|
||
1 = U.S. AVERAGE
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, EMSI, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
168
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
169
|
||
|
||
1.7 Tourism Cluster
|
||
Contributions to National Annual Growth in Real Tourism
|
||
|
||
487210 Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water
|
||
|
||
561510 Travel Agencies
|
||
|
||
561591 Convention and Visitors’ Bureaus
|
||
|
||
713910 Golf Courses and Country Clubs
|
||
|
||
713930 Marinas
|
||
|
||
713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
|
||
|
||
721110 Hotels and Motels, Except Casino Hotels
|
||
|
||
721211 RV Parks and Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
722310 Food Service Contractors
|
||
|
||
722320 Caterers
|
||
|
||
722511 Full-service Restaurants
|
||
|
||
722513 Limited-service Restaurants
|
||
|
||
722514 Cafeterias, Grill Buffets, & Buffets
|
||
|
||
722515 Snack & Nonalcoholic Beverage Bars
|
||
|
||
CONTRIBUTIONS TO NATIONAL ANNUAL GROWTH IN REAL TOURISM OUTPUT IN 2016-2019
|
||
|
||
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
|
||
|
||
Traveler Accommodations
|
||
|
||
Food & Beverage Services
|
||
|
||
Transportation
|
||
|
||
Recreation, Entertainment, &
|
||
|
||
shopping
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL OVERALL TOURISM GROWTH
|
||
|
||
|.7 Tourism Cluster
|
||
|
||
Contributions to National Annual Growth in Real Tourism
|
||
|
||
CONTRIBUTIONS TO NATIONAL ANNUAL GROWTH IN REAL TOURISM OUTPUT IN 2016-2019
|
||
|
||
3.0%
|
||
@
|
||
2.5% ®
|
||
@) _ Transportation
|
||
@
|
||
shopping
|
||
2.0%
|
||
1.5%
|
||
1.0%
|
||
0.5% nul
|
||
0.0%
|
||
-0.5% 2016 2017 2018 2019
|
||
|
||
ANNUAL OVERALL TOURISM GROWTH
|
||
|
||
a ee
|
||
|
||
" 2.7%
|
||
2.0% 1.5%
|
||
|
||
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis,
|
||
|
||
Traveler Accommodations
|
||
|
||
Food & Beverage Services
|
||
|
||
Recreation, Entertainment, &
|
||
|
||
169
|
||
|
||
NAICS CODES IN CLUSTER
|
||
|
||
487210 Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water
|
||
561510 Travel Agencies
|
||
|
||
561591 Convention and Visitors’ Bureaus
|
||
713910 Golf Courses and Country Clubs
|
||
|
||
713930 Marinas
|
||
|
||
713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
|
||
721110 Hotels and Motels, Except Casino Hotels
|
||
721211 RV Parks and Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
722310 Food Service Contractors
|
||
|
||
722320 Caterers
|
||
|
||
722511 Full-service Restaurants
|
||
|
||
722513 Limited-service Restaurants
|
||
|
||
722514 Cafeterias, Grill Buffets, & Buffets
|
||
722515 Snack & Nonalcoholic Beverage Bars
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
170
|
||
|
||
1.8 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Recommendations:
|
||
|
||
Priority should be given to adding jobs which ensure the continuation of outdoor recreation
|
||
|
||
opportunities in the future and provide best year-round possibilities:
|
||
|
||
1. Water quality management to ensure rivers stay recreation ready and to ensure fish health for
|
||
|
||
continued fishing access
|
||
|
||
2. Accommodations which are activity inclusive and can offer off-season nature retreats, digital detox
|
||
|
||
retreats, or nature-based relaxation which does not directly require trail access.
|
||
|
||
3. Working with existing RV Resorts and Campgrounds to introduce similar programming for the off-
|
||
|
||
season period to drive need for long term employment
|
||
|
||
4. Courting group travel which may be more open to coming during the off season to make use of
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation areas but may not need actual trail access like schools or nursing homes.
|
||
|
||
5. Forestry planning which allows for recreation access where possible, perhaps in a guided capacity
|
||
|
||
to ensure safety
|
||
|
||
6. Working with restaurants to align open hours and menu offerings with tourist preferences for at
|
||
|
||
least the highest visitation portion of the year.
|
||
|
||
1.8 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Recommendations:
|
||
|
||
Priority should be given to adding jobs which ensure the continuation of outdoor recreation
|
||
opportunities in the future and provide best year-round possibilities:
|
||
|
||
1.
|
||
|
||
Water quality management to ensure rivers stay recreation ready and to ensure fish health for
|
||
continued fishing access
|
||
|
||
. Accommodations which are activity inclusive and can offer off-season nature retreats, digital detox
|
||
|
||
retreats, or nature-based relaxation which does not directly require trail access.
|
||
|
||
. Working with existing RV Resorts and Campgrounds to introduce similar programming for the off-
|
||
|
||
season period to drive need for long term employment
|
||
|
||
. Courting group travel which may be more open to coming during the off season to make use of
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation areas but may not need actual trail access like schools or nursing homes.
|
||
|
||
. Forestry planning which allows for recreation access where possible, perhaps in a guided capacity
|
||
|
||
to ensure safety
|
||
|
||
. Working with restaurants to align open hours and menu offerings with tourist preferences for at
|
||
|
||
least the highest visitation portion of the year.
|
||
|
||
170
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
171
|
||
|
||
1.9 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Job Quality Brought by Outdoor Recreation to the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Of new outdoor participants during the pandemic, most stayed closer to home and 62% engaged in
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation for exercise and health (OIA, 2021). 53% of participants in outdoor recreation during
|
||
|
||
the pandemic reported a greater sense of mental health and wellbeing (UVM, 2020).
|
||
|
||
Outdoor industry job quality for year-round employment will be tied to local participation in outdoor
|
||
|
||
recreation providing a draw for remote workers and assisting in worker retention in the area. Local
|
||
|
||
support and participation in outdoor recreation initiatives provides greater resiliency in times of
|
||
|
||
economic downturn.
|
||
|
||
Outdoor recreation should be considered a quality of life investment for residents and not merely a
|
||
|
||
tourist draw. Most tourist facing businesses in the area report a substantial amount of business coming
|
||
|
||
from the local population.
|
||
|
||
Grima, N., Corcoran, W., Hill-James, C., Langton, B., Sommer, H., and Fisher, B. (2020). The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the
|
||
|
||
COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243344
|
||
|
||
Outdoor Industry Association. (2021). The New Outdoor Participant: COVID and Beyond.
|
||
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243344
|
||
1.9 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Job Quality Brought by Outdoor Recreation to the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Of new outdoor participants during the pandemic, most stayed closer to home and 62% engaged in
|
||
outdoor recreation for exercise and health (OIA, 2021). 53% of participants in outdoor recreation during
|
||
the pandemic reported a greater sense of mental health and wellbeing (UVM, 2020).
|
||
|
||
Outdoor industry job quality for year-round employment will be tied to local participation in outdoor
|
||
recreation providing a draw for remote workers and assisting in worker retention in the area. Local
|
||
support and participation in outdoor recreation initiatives provides greater resiliency in times of
|
||
economic downturn.
|
||
|
||
Outdoor recreation should be considered a quality of life investment for residents and not merely a
|
||
tourist draw. Most tourist facing businesses in the area report a substantial amount of business coming
|
||
from the local population.
|
||
|
||
Grima, N., Corcoran, W., Hill-James, C., Langton, B., Sommer, H., and Fisher, B. (2020). The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the
|
||
COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.137 1/journal,pone,0243344
|
||
Outdoor Industry Association. (2021). The New Outdoor Participant: COVID and Beyond.
|
||
|
||
171
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
172
|
||
|
||
1.10 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Non-local Tourism
|
||
|
||
How much of your business comes from
|
||
|
||
tourists outside the region as opposed to
|
||
|
||
local sources? (Tourism Only)
|
||
|
||
|.10 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Non-local Tourism
|
||
|
||
How much of your business comes from
|
||
tourists outside the region as opposed to
|
||
local sources? (Tourism Only)
|
||
|
||
25-50%
|
||
10-25% 25%
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
75-95%
|
||
25%
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
173
|
||
|
||
1.11 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Job Quality Brought by Outdoor Recreation to the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Live Better, Work Better
|
||
|
||
Address “brain drain” and bolster remote work attractiveness of the destination by centering outdoor
|
||
|
||
recreation opportunities. Access to outdoor recreation aids in mental strain during the pandemic and
|
||
|
||
has now been shown to be an attractive element in trip planning into the future.
|
||
|
||
All jobs in the region increase in quality in a pandemic or economic downturn environment where travel
|
||
|
||
becomes restricted financially or physically. The value people see in the outdoors has grown, and this
|
||
|
||
should be part of the pitch when considering remote worker recruitment.
|
||
|
||
There are numerous campaigns currently running to recruit remote workers offering a variety of
|
||
|
||
incentives. Thus far, there is no hard data on how successful those campaigns have been. However,
|
||
|
||
there is support for the importance placed on access to nature close to home and that becoming a
|
||
|
||
priority for people in remote work environments.
|
||
|
||
Overwhelmingly, stakeholders agreed that a remote worker recruitment campaign would aid the region.
|
||
|
||
This should be a top priority not only for population maintenance and growth, but also for continued
|
||
|
||
local support of outdoor recreation jobs in the area.
|
||
|
||
1.11 Existing Outdoor Recreation Job Opportunities
|
||
Job Quality Brought by Outdoor Recreation to the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Live Better, Work Better
|
||
|
||
Address “brain drain” and bolster remote work attractiveness of the destination by centering outdoor
|
||
recreation opportunities. Access to outdoor recreation aids in mental strain during the pandemic and
|
||
has now been shown to be an attractive element in trip planning into the future.
|
||
|
||
All jobs in the region increase in quality in a pandemic or economic downturn environment where travel
|
||
becomes restricted financially or physically. The value people see in the outdoors has grown, and this
|
||
should be part of the pitch when considering remote worker recruitment.
|
||
|
||
There are numerous campaigns currently running to recruit remote workers offering a variety of
|
||
incentives. Thus far, there is no hard data on how successful those campaigns have been. However,
|
||
there is support for the importance placed on access to nature close to home and that becoming a
|
||
priority for people in remote work environments.
|
||
|
||
Overwhelmingly, stakeholders agreed that a remote worker recruitment campaign would aid the region.
|
||
This should be a top priority not only for population maintenance and growth, but also for continued
|
||
local support of outdoor recreation jobs in the area.
|
||
|
||
173
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
2.0 New Outdoor Recreation
|
||
|
||
Jobs, Small Businesses, and
|
||
|
||
Gap-Filling Entrepreneurship
|
||
|
||
2.0 New Outdoor Recreation
|
||
Jobs, Small Businesses, and
|
||
Gap-Filling Entrepreneurship
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
175
|
||
|
||
2.1.1 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
Identify new outdoor recreation job and small business opportunities not currently utilized in the four counties,
|
||
|
||
with a particular emphasis on gap-filling entrepreneurship ventures that support primary tourism drivers (Breaks
|
||
Interstate Park, Clinch River State Park, Back of the Dragon, Spearhead Trails, SWVA Outdoors, etc.).
|
||
|
||
Pre-pandemic the highest spending rates in outdoor recreation were: 1. Trail sports, 2. Camping, 3.
|
||
|
||
Water sports with a combined spend of $508bil annually in the US
|
||
|
||
Top 5 outdoor activities with new participants during the pandemic were: 1. Walking, 2.
|
||
|
||
Running/Jogging, 3. Cycling, 4. Birdwatching, 5. Fishing (OIA, 2021, The New Outdoor Participant)
|
||
|
||
New business opportunities could focus around increasing trail access and water access. Ease of
|
||
|
||
access is key which relates to not only physical access but ease of total trip planning and ability to
|
||
|
||
satisfy tourist needs while on vacation.
|
||
|
||
This aligns with key market cluster study analysis of high impact opportunities in RV Parks and
|
||
|
||
campgrounds, Restaurants, and Water-based Scenic and sightseeing transportation
|
||
|
||
2.1.1 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
Identify new outdoor recreation job and small business opportunities not currently utilized in the four counties,
|
||
with a particular emphasis on gap-filling entrepreneurship ventures that support primary tourism drivers (Breaks
|
||
Interstate Park, Clinch River State Park, Back of the Dragon, Spearhead Trails, SWVA Outdoors, etc.).
|
||
|
||
Pre-pandemic the highest spending rates in outdoor recreation were: 1. Trail sports, 2. Camping, 3.
|
||
Water sports with a combined spend of $508bil annually in the US
|
||
|
||
Top 5 outdoor activities with new participants during the pandemic were: 1. Walking, 2.
|
||
Running/Jogging, 3. Cycling, 4. Birdwatching, 5. Fishing (O/A, 2021, The New Outdoor Participant)
|
||
|
||
New business opportunities could focus around increasing trail access and water access. Ease of
|
||
access is key which relates to not only physical access but ease of total trip planning and ability to
|
||
satisfy tourist needs while on vacation.
|
||
|
||
This aligns with key market cluster study analysis of high impact opportunities in RV Parks and
|
||
campgrounds, Restaurants, and Water-based Scenic and sightseeing transportation
|
||
|
||
175,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
176
|
||
|
||
2.1.2 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
New Business Needs
|
||
|
||
Cluster development around identified access points for outdoor recreation with visitor services like
|
||
|
||
restaurants, accommodations, and guides and outfitters
|
||
|
||
Replicating high-success models from the region such as Southern Gap with Spearhead Trails access
|
||
|
||
and Back of the Dragon development where multiple tourists needs are met in the same area. The
|
||
|
||
success of these locations is largely due to the proximity of visitor services to area attractions.
|
||
|
||
Visitor services in the region are currently clustered around major roadways. This is a good model for
|
||
|
||
business travel, but can make planning difficult when considering outdoor recreation leisure travel.
|
||
|
||
2.1.2 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
New Business Needs
|
||
|
||
Cluster development around identified access points for outdoor recreation with visitor services like
|
||
restaurants, accommodations, and guides and outfitters
|
||
|
||
Replicating high-success models from the region such as Southern Gap with Spearhead Trails access
|
||
and Back of the Dragon development where multiple tourists needs are met in the same area. The
|
||
success of these locations is largely due to the proximity of visitor services to area attractions.
|
||
|
||
Visitor services in the region are currently clustered around major roadways. This is a good model for
|
||
business travel, but can make planning difficult when considering outdoor recreation leisure travel.
|
||
|
||
176
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
177
|
||
|
||
2.2.1 Select Tourism Assets
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OpenStreetMap, Hickey Global Consulting Services, Regional County Tourism Departments
|
||
|
||
Accommodation
|
||
|
||
Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
Historical Site
|
||
|
||
Museum
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
Park
|
||
|
||
Trail
|
||
|
||
2.2.\ Select Tourism Assets
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
eK Gilbert Creek vv OY ninevine aes Mn SIRT a eet
|
||
van Freehurny Wharncliffe “ cone
|
||
Floyd County Het Pation MoVeigh Majestic WAY “
|
||
‘Breathitt County Coal pot 2 Phelps 16 Heindon
|
||
ier ~
|
||
_ Pv] 1441 52 10|_
|
||
Handige~Vackey Gikevils ike County > eoger Davy nue
|
||
80 Réderfield
|
||
Wayland Galveston ft19} 194 Paw/Paw Wéich,
|
||
home Shelbiana 48) \\KGimballorthfork Crumpler, > Matoaka
|
||
McDowell County Mercer County
|
||
Ligon Maybeury Princet
|
||
|
||
Gamer Knott County 12 Dane oe Bradshaw ey patton »\ Montcalm yy aaa
|
||
|
||
RB Pippa Passes Wheelwright = Buchanan County, 83 24) S Ingleside
|
||
), S|
|
||
80 War, AL
|
||
160 : Wy, UTaaEDD Grundy an Gers) iles'C
|
||
Speight —_-Dorfon 97 7 2 @ Berwin] 16 2) Busted Slles'Coun
|
||
; Jewell Valley i 598
|
||
Ison\ S Ce. 14 Vansant Squire 20) Rocky cep
|
||
McRoberts ® Q Tiptop
|
||
63 Mavisdale Te
|
||
j Jewell Ridge one
|
||
15 {805 60)
|
||
Milstoné | Jenkins s G5)
|
||
fe ae @— Clinehco Tazewell County,
|
||
|
||
-etcher Letcher, County
|
||
Whites! toon
|
||
|
||
Dickenson County,
|
||
McClure
|
||
|
||
931
|
||
|
||
80 Raven G6) BE
|
||
|
||
72 63
|
||
|
||
rammel (3)
|
||
|
||
Russell|County,
|
||
(21)
|
||
}___—_Coeburn © e 6 G2
|
||
Norton County eR 42)
|
||
5257)
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
Allison Gap
|
||
.,
|
||
|
||
Dungannon ©
|
||
|
||
Emory.
|
||
lickelsville
|
||
|
||
rz Washington County (U1
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OpenStreetMap, Hickey Global Consulting Services, Regional County Tourism Departments
|
||
|
||
177
|
||
|
||
67) rn 6 Gea “Bisnd Cour
|
||
|
||
542)
|
||
|
||
Burkes Garden
|
||
|
||
52
|
||
16
|
||
32 Kent
|
||
21
|
||
Broadford
|
||
90
|
||
Rural Retreat Wythe Coun
|
||
Atkins
|
||
Smyth County
|
||
Marion ;
|
||
McMulli Cripple Creek
|
||
Adwolf
|
||
Sugar Grove Carroll County
|
||
a ~~
|
||
16] 9
|
||
oo” 21
|
||
|
||
Accommodation
|
||
Campgrounds
|
||
Historical Site
|
||
Museum
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
Park
|
||
|
||
Trail
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
178
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER Tourist Site
|
||
ACCOMMODATION
|
||
|
||
1 Comfort Inn
|
||
|
||
2 Comfort Inn & Suites
|
||
|
||
3 Cuz's Cabins & Restaurant
|
||
|
||
4 Elk Garden Methodist Bike Hostel
|
||
|
||
5 Fincastle Motor Inn
|
||
|
||
6 Holiday Inn Express & Suites Lebanon, an IHG Hotel
|
||
|
||
7 Holiday Inn Express Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
|
||
8 Real McCoy Cabins, Country Store and Kitchen
|
||
|
||
9 Sleep Inn & Suites
|
||
|
||
10 Super 8 by Wyndham Lebanon
|
||
|
||
11 Super 8 Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
|
||
12 Western Front Hotel
|
||
|
||
CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
13 Riverbend Campground
|
||
|
||
14 Southern Gap Outdoor Adventure
|
||
|
||
15 Thunder River Campground
|
||
|
||
16 Trailhead ATV Resort
|
||
|
||
HISTORICAL SITES
|
||
|
||
17 Coal Miners' Memorial
|
||
|
||
18 Ellenbrook Mansion
|
||
|
||
19 Old Russell County Court House (Robert Dickenson Home)
|
||
|
||
20 Walter McDonald Sanders House
|
||
|
||
MUSEUMS
|
||
|
||
21 Dante Coal Miners & Railroad Museum
|
||
|
||
22 Historic Crab Orchard Museum
|
||
|
||
23 Honaker Heritage Museum
|
||
|
||
24 Pocahontas Exhibition Coal Mine & Museum
|
||
|
||
25 Ralph Stanley Museum
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER Tourist Site
|
||
OTHER TOURIST SITES
|
||
|
||
26 Citizens for the Arts
|
||
|
||
27 Clinch River Farms
|
||
|
||
28 Foxtail Orchards, Inc
|
||
|
||
29 Plumb Creek Winery
|
||
|
||
30 Sandy Head Ostrich Farm
|
||
|
||
PARKS
|
||
|
||
31 Big Cedar Creek
|
||
|
||
32 Birch Knob Observation Tower
|
||
|
||
33 Breaks Interstate Park
|
||
|
||
34 Burkes Garden
|
||
|
||
35 Cavitt's Creek Park
|
||
|
||
36 Cedar Bluff
|
||
|
||
37 Clinch River State Park
|
||
|
||
38 Hidden Valley Climbing
|
||
|
||
39 Hidden Valley Wildlife Management Area
|
||
|
||
40 John W Flannagan Dam
|
||
|
||
41 Keen Mountain Park
|
||
|
||
42 Laurel Bed Lake
|
||
|
||
43 Lincolnshire Park
|
||
|
||
44 Pinnacle Natural Area Preserve
|
||
|
||
45 Poplar Gap Park
|
||
|
||
46 Tank Hollow Falls
|
||
|
||
47 The Channels Natural Area Preserve
|
||
|
||
48 Verner Blankenship Community Park
|
||
|
||
TRAILS
|
||
|
||
49 Brumley Mountain Trail
|
||
|
||
50 Coal Canyon Trailhead
|
||
|
||
51 Great Channels Trailhead
|
||
|
||
52 Pocahontas OHV Trailhead
|
||
|
||
53 Ridgeview Trailhead
|
||
|
||
54 Sugar Hill Trail System
|
||
|
||
55 The Original Pocahontas Trailhead
|
||
|
||
2.2.2 Select Tourism Assets
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
2.2.2 Select Tourism Assets
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER
|
||
ACCOMMODATION
|
||
|
||
ODN DOR WY
|
||
|
||
Pe
|
||
ro
|
||
|
||
12
|
||
CAMPGROUNDS
|
||
|
||
MUSEUMS
|
||
21
|
||
22
|
||
23
|
||
24
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
Tourist Site
|
||
|
||
Comfort Inn
|
||
Comfort Inn & Suites
|
||
Cuz's Cabins & Restaurant
|
||
Elk Garden Methodist Bike Hostel
|
||
Fincastle Motor Inn
|
||
Holiday Inn Express & Suites Lebanon, an IHG Hotel
|
||
Holiday Inn Express Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
Real McCoy Cabins, Country Store and Kitchen
|
||
Sleep Inn & Suites
|
||
Super 8 by Wyndham Lebanon
|
||
Super 8 Richlands/Claypool Hill
|
||
lestern Front Hotel
|
||
|
||
Riverbend Campground
|
||
Southern Gap Outdoor Adventure
|
||
Thunder River Campground
|
||
Trailhead ATV Resort
|
||
|
||
z
|
||
a
|
||
x
|
||
3°
|
||
2
|
||
fe)
|
||
>
|
||
cr
|
||
Q
|
||
Sj
|
||
m
|
||
2)
|
||
|
||
Coal Miners' Memorial
|
||
|
||
Ellenbrook Mansion
|
||
|
||
Old Russell County Court House (Robert Dickenson Home)
|
||
alter McDonald Sanders House
|
||
|
||
Dante Coal Miners & Railroad Museum
|
||
Historic Crab Orchard Museum
|
||
|
||
Honaker Heritage Museum
|
||
|
||
Pocahontas Exhibition Coal Mine & Museum
|
||
Ralph Stanley Museum
|
||
|
||
178
|
||
|
||
MAP ID NUMBER
|
||
OTHER TOURIST SITES
|
||
26
|
||
27
|
||
28
|
||
29
|
||
30
|
||
PARKS
|
||
31
|
||
32
|
||
33
|
||
34
|
||
35
|
||
36
|
||
37
|
||
38
|
||
39
|
||
40
|
||
41
|
||
42
|
||
43
|
||
44
|
||
45
|
||
46
|
||
47
|
||
48
|
||
TRAI
|
||
|
||
49
|
||
50
|
||
yl
|
||
52
|
||
53
|
||
54
|
||
95
|
||
|
||
Citizens for the Arts
|
||
Clinch River Farms
|
||
Foxtail Orchards, Inc
|
||
Plumb Creek Winery
|
||
‘Sandy Head Ostrich Farm
|
||
|
||
Big Cedar Creek
|
||
|
||
Birch Knob Observation Tower
|
||
Breaks Interstate Park
|
||
|
||
Burkes Garden
|
||
|
||
Cavitt's Creek Park
|
||
|
||
Cedar Bluff
|
||
|
||
Clinch River State Park
|
||
Hidden Valley Climbing
|
||
|
||
Tourist Site
|
||
|
||
Hidden Valley Wildlife Management Area
|
||
|
||
John W Flannagan Dam
|
||
|
||
Keen Mountain Park
|
||
|
||
Laurel Bed Lake
|
||
|
||
Lincolnshire Park
|
||
|
||
Pinnacle Natural Area Preserve
|
||
Poplar Gap Park
|
||
|
||
Tank Hollow Falls
|
||
|
||
The Channels Natural Area Preserve
|
||
Verner Blankenship Community Park
|
||
|
||
Brumley Mountain Trail
|
||
|
||
Coal Canyon Trailhead
|
||
|
||
Great Channels Trailhead
|
||
Pocahontas OHV Trailhead
|
||
Ridgeview Trailhead
|
||
|
||
Sugar Hill Trail System
|
||
|
||
The Original Pocahontas Trailhead
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
179
|
||
|
||
2.3 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
Recommended key development locations should each have an outdoor recreation use focus. This will
|
||
|
||
ensure that visitor services are well matched to the actual activities tourists will be engaging in at these
|
||
|
||
locations. A singular location may provide opportunities for multiple activities, but for the sake of
|
||
|
||
development, a primary activity should be identified and developed around:
|
||
|
||
• Hiking
|
||
|
||
• Trans-America Trail
|
||
|
||
• Fishing
|
||
|
||
• Camping
|
||
|
||
• Off-Road Trails
|
||
|
||
• Birding
|
||
|
||
The ability to provide a rest and relaxation element is, in part, ease of trip planning. Having a robust
|
||
|
||
number of restaurants, places to stay near outdoor recreation activities, and low barriers to entry in
|
||
|
||
participation are all key factors in providing the type of outdoor recreation-based vacation travelers are
|
||
|
||
most interested in as the tourism economy begins to recover from the effects of the pandemic.
|
||
|
||
2.3 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
Recommended key development locations should each have an outdoor recreation use focus. This will
|
||
ensure that visitor services are well matched to the actual activities tourists will be engaging in at these
|
||
locations. A singular location may provide opportunities for multiple activities, but for the sake of
|
||
development, a primary activity should be identified and developed around:
|
||
|
||
° Hiking
|
||
|
||
¢ Trans-America Trail
|
||
|
||
¢ Fishing
|
||
|
||
* Camping
|
||
|
||
¢ Off-Road Trails
|
||
|
||
° Birding
|
||
|
||
The ability to provide a rest and relaxation element is, in part, ease of trip planning. Having a robust
|
||
number of restaurants, places to stay near outdoor recreation activities, and low barriers to entry in
|
||
participation are all key factors in providing the type of outdoor recreation-based vacation travelers are
|
||
most interested in as the tourism economy begins to recover from the effects of the pandemic.
|
||
|
||
179
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
180
|
||
|
||
2.4 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
Tourist Needs Checklist for Key Areas:
|
||
|
||
Full service restaurant available for lunch-dinner
|
||
|
||
• Serves some local food products
|
||
|
||
• Serves cultural or restaurant specialty item
|
||
|
||
Grocery Store
|
||
|
||
• Sells packaged goods for travel
|
||
|
||
• Some local products available
|
||
|
||
Accommodations within walking access to area’s identified
|
||
|
||
major attraction
|
||
|
||
• Walking access can be substituted for shuttle or other public
|
||
|
||
transit access
|
||
|
||
Alcohol availability
|
||
|
||
• This can be provided at either a restaurant location or at a
|
||
|
||
grocery store
|
||
|
||
• A local alcohol offering should be available along with nationally
|
||
|
||
recognized brands
|
||
|
||
Visitor Service or Information Area (Does not need to be
|
||
|
||
staffed)
|
||
|
||
• Has maps available
|
||
|
||
• Has area guides available
|
||
|
||
• Has information on rentals
|
||
|
||
• Has any area restrictions or policies
|
||
|
||
• Has emergency services information
|
||
|
||
Outfitter/Guide
|
||
|
||
• Has relevant equipment to purchase or rent
|
||
|
||
• Provides at least one guided service
|
||
|
||
• Has repair capacities where activity necessitates
|
||
|
||
Internet and Cell Service availability
|
||
|
||
• Important for emergency services
|
||
|
||
• Area encourages social media engagement during trip and after
|
||
|
||
return
|
||
|
||
2.4 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
Tourist Needs Checklist for Key Areas:
|
||
|
||
» Full service restaurant available for lunch-dinner > Visitor Service or Information Area (Does not need to be
|
||
e Serves some local food products staffed)
|
||
e Serves cultural or restaurant specialty item e Has maps available
|
||
e Has area guides available
|
||
» Grocery Store e Has information on rentals
|
||
e Sells packaged goods for travel e Has any area restrictions or policies
|
||
e Some local products available e Has emergency services information
|
||
|
||
» Accommodations within walking access to area’s identified » Outfitter/Guide
|
||
|
||
major attraction e Has relevant equipment to purchase or rent
|
||
e Walking access can be substituted for shuttle or other public e Provides at least one guided service
|
||
transit access e Has repair capacities where activity necessitates
|
||
» Alcohol availability > Internet and Cell Service availability
|
||
e This can be provided at either a restaurant location or ata e Important for emergency services
|
||
grocery store e Area encourages social media engagement during trip and after
|
||
e A local alcohol offering should be available along with nationally return
|
||
|
||
recognized brands
|
||
|
||
180
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
181
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
In many areas, these needs can be combined within a single business. Especially as areas begin to
|
||
|
||
develop and grow, it will be best to focus on those services which serve resident and tourist needs
|
||
|
||
equally.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, certain services may be unstaffed to start and become staffed as demand grows.
|
||
|
||
This checklist aligns with needs identified by stakeholders during the interview process.
|
||
|
||
Aside from accommodations and visitor information, all items on the checklist will also increase overall
|
||
|
||
resident quality of life. As these areas develop, they become more attractive to remote workers and
|
||
|
||
improve walkability for tourists and residents alike. This checklist is designed with improving livability in
|
||
|
||
mind so as to create areas that both tourists and residents may enjoy as opposed to developing areas
|
||
|
||
into tourist only spaces.
|
||
|
||
In developing these small businesses, preference and funding should be given to encourage adaptive
|
||
|
||
reuse of existing structures in these areas as opposed to new buildings where possible. This will
|
||
|
||
maintain local character and history both of which are highly ranked as attractive to visitors.
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
In many areas, these needs can be combined within a single business. Especially as areas begin to
|
||
develop and grow, it will be best to focus on those services which serve resident and tourist needs
|
||
equally.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, certain services may be unstaffed to start and become staffed as demand grows.
|
||
This checklist aligns with needs identified by stakeholders during the interview process.
|
||
|
||
Aside from accommodations and visitor information, all items on the checklist will also increase overall
|
||
resident quality of life. As these areas develop, they become more attractive to remote workers and
|
||
improve walkability for tourists and residents alike. This checklist is designed with improving livability in
|
||
mind so as to create areas that both tourists and residents may enjoy as opposed to developing areas
|
||
into tourist only spaces.
|
||
|
||
In developing these small businesses, preference and funding should be given to encourage adaptive
|
||
reuse of existing structures in these areas as opposed to new buildings where possible. This will
|
||
maintain local character and history both of which are highly ranked as attractive to visitors.
|
||
|
||
181
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
182
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
Overall, better support services are needed for entrepreneurs looking to start these new ventures. The
|
||
|
||
Southern Virginia Community College should be engaged to develop a restaurant and hospitality
|
||
|
||
program as part of their business track offerings to teach business skills around owning and operating
|
||
|
||
these types of businesses.
|
||
|
||
Counties or a relevant economic interest group should provide scholarships for entrepreneurs interested
|
||
|
||
in starting needed visitor service businesses in identified opportunity and development zones. This
|
||
|
||
program could be used to incentivize business development in a way that is more likely to be
|
||
|
||
sustainable in the long term and ensure that other local grant money is being given to businesses with
|
||
|
||
the best chance of stability.
|
||
|
||
Especially in a pandemic environment where recovery and businesses continuation funding becomes
|
||
|
||
available, training investments in local small business owners could ensure that recovery funding goes
|
||
|
||
towards businesses that are suffering due to economic downturn as opposed to unsustainable business
|
||
|
||
practice.
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 New Outdoor Recreation Job and Small Business Opportunities
|
||
|
||
Overall, better support services are needed for entrepreneurs looking to start these new ventures. The
|
||
Southern Virginia Community College should be engaged to develop a restaurant and hospitality
|
||
program as part of their business track offerings to teach business skills around owning and operating
|
||
these types of businesses.
|
||
|
||
Counties or a relevant economic interest group should provide scholarships for entrepreneurs interested
|
||
in starting needed visitor service businesses in identified opportunity and development zones. This
|
||
program could be used to incentivize business development in a way that is more likely to be
|
||
sustainable in the long term and ensure that other local grant money is being given to businesses with
|
||
the best chance of stability.
|
||
|
||
Especially in a pandemic environment where recovery and businesses continuation funding becomes
|
||
available, training investments in local small business owners could ensure that recovery funding goes
|
||
towards businesses that are suffering due to economic downturn as opposed to unsustainable business
|
||
practice.
|
||
|
||
182
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
3.0 Tourism Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
Plan
|
||
|
||
Tourism Pandemic Response
|
||
Plan
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
184
|
||
|
||
3.1.1 Tourism Best Practices
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
By now, the primary control and containment protocols for pandemic response are well known. These 5 elements are the cornerstone of
|
||
pandemic response for all tourism businesses and can be rapidly implemented in a pandemic environment.
|
||
|
||
1 PHYSICAL DISTANCING 2 TRANSMISSION BARRIERS 3 ENHANCED SANITATION 4 LIMITING IN PERSON INTERACTION 5 HEALTH SCREENINGS
|
||
|
||
• Maintaining government
|
||
|
||
suggested distances between
|
||
|
||
people
|
||
|
||
• Operating businesses at
|
||
|
||
partial capacity
|
||
|
||
• Face masks
|
||
|
||
• Physical barriers for in person
|
||
|
||
interaction
|
||
|
||
• Face shields
|
||
|
||
• Other PPE
|
||
|
||
• More frequent cleaning of
|
||
|
||
high-touch surfaces
|
||
|
||
• Use of products proven
|
||
|
||
effective against virus
|
||
|
||
• Hand washing
|
||
|
||
• Hand sanitizing
|
||
|
||
• Post exposure quarantine
|
||
|
||
• Automated services
|
||
|
||
• Stay at home orders
|
||
|
||
• Contactless services
|
||
|
||
• Testing for viral infection
|
||
|
||
• Symptom monitoring
|
||
|
||
• Vaccination checks
|
||
|
||
3.1.) Tourism Best Practices
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
By wow the primary control and containment protocols for pandemic response are well known. These 5 elements are the cornerstone of
|
||
|
||
pandemic response for all tourism businesses and can be rapidly implemented in a pandemic environment.
|
||
|
||
PHYSICAL DISTANCING ENHANCED SANITATION HEALTH SCREENINGS
|
||
° Maintaining government * Face masks ° More frequent cleaning of ¢ Post exposure quarantine * Testing for viral infection
|
||
suggested distances between high-touch surfaces
|
||
people « Physical barriers for in person « Automated services « Symptom monitoring
|
||
interaction ° Use of products proven .
|
||
* Operating businesses at effective against virus * Stay at home orders * Vaccination checks
|
||
* Face shields
|
||
|
||
partial capacity
|
||
|
||
* Hand washing Contactless services
|
||
|
||
Other PPE
|
||
° Hand sanitizing
|
||
|
||
184
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
185
|
||
|
||
3.1.2 Tourism Best Practices
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
Recommended equipment and assistance needed to rapidly enact pandemic response varies for each operational category. Access to the
|
||
following items will be essential in meeting a pandemic threat while keeping businesses operational. Starred items (*) should be maintained in a
|
||
small stockpile within the region for rapid deployment in a pandemic scenario.
|
||
|
||
1 PHYSICAL DISTANCING 2 TRANSMISSION BARRIERS 3 ENHANCED SANITATION 4 LIMITING IN PERSON INTERACTION 5 HEALTH SCREENINGS
|
||
|
||
• Signage indicating occupancy
|
||
|
||
limitations
|
||
|
||
• Physical markers denoting
|
||
|
||
distancing
|
||
|
||
• Face masks*
|
||
|
||
• Transparent plastic sheets for
|
||
|
||
barriers
|
||
|
||
• Face shields
|
||
|
||
• Other PPE
|
||
|
||
• CDC approved cleaning
|
||
|
||
solutions
|
||
|
||
• Additional soap, cloths, and
|
||
|
||
paper towels*
|
||
|
||
• Hand sanitizer*
|
||
|
||
• Technologies which limit
|
||
|
||
person to person interaction
|
||
|
||
• Websites which allow for
|
||
|
||
online ordering and payment
|
||
|
||
processing
|
||
|
||
• Online presence to update
|
||
|
||
open status and business
|
||
|
||
restrictions
|
||
|
||
• Testing kits
|
||
|
||
• Online platforms for symptom
|
||
|
||
checks and waivers
|
||
|
||
• Vaccination waivers
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
|
||
3.1.2 Tourism Best Practices
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Recommended equipment and assistance needed to rapidly enact pandemic response varies for each operational category. Access to the
|
||
following items will be essential in meeting a pandemic threat while keeping businesses operational. Starred items (*) should be maintained in a
|
||
small stockpile within the region for rapid deployment in a pandemic scenario.
|
||
|
||
PHYSICAL DISTANCING
|
||
|
||
ENHANCED SANITATION
|
||
|
||
* Signage indicating occupancy
|
||
limitations
|
||
|
||
« Physical markers denoting
|
||
distancing
|
||
|
||
Face masks*
|
||
|
||
Transparent plastic sheets for
|
||
barriers
|
||
|
||
Face shields
|
||
|
||
Other PPE
|
||
|
||
* CDC approved cleaning
|
||
solutions
|
||
|
||
« Additional soap, cloths, and
|
||
paper towels*
|
||
|
||
* Hand sanitizer*
|
||
|
||
* Technologies which limit
|
||
person to person interaction
|
||
|
||
« Websites which allow for
|
||
online ordering and payment
|
||
processing
|
||
|
||
° Online presence to update
|
||
open status and business
|
||
restrictions
|
||
|
||
HEALTH SCREENINGS
|
||
° Testing kits
|
||
|
||
* Online platforms for symptom
|
||
checks and waivers
|
||
|
||
« Vaccination waivers
|
||
|
||
185
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
186
|
||
|
||
3.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Business-related pandemic response
|
||
|
||
What was done well (with
|
||
|
||
region's business-related
|
||
|
||
pandemic response
|
||
|
||
efforts)?
|
||
|
||
Health Services
|
||
• Did a great job working with local health department on what was
|
||
|
||
expected.
|
||
|
||
• Health care stepped up with testing.
|
||
|
||
• Vaccine rollout did well.
|
||
|
||
• Contact with local health department office and covid clinics.
|
||
|
||
• Acted quickly to protect the aging population.
|
||
|
||
• Rollout of the vaccines went well.
|
||
|
||
• Hands-on health department. Had active outreach from health
|
||
|
||
department for events.
|
||
|
||
• Grant funding was well run and distributed effectively.
|
||
|
||
• CARES money was distributed well.
|
||
|
||
• IDA had funds available quickly. Application process was very easy.
|
||
|
||
• Turnaround on funds was fast to get people reopened.
|
||
|
||
• Grant access was smooth and there was assistance in getting funding.
|
||
|
||
• PPP distribution was done well. Business wouldn't have survived without
|
||
|
||
it.
|
||
|
||
• The Cumberland Plateau provided me with easy access to funds to build
|
||
|
||
our capabilities which allowed me to hire additional workers.
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
|
||
• Board of supervisors were supportive of businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Help with navigating the language of the mandates.
|
||
|
||
• County tourism called to check in on reopening; fairly regular
|
||
|
||
communications.
|
||
|
||
• Everyone worked together.
|
||
|
||
• Overall, good. Proactive reach out.
|
||
|
||
Community Response
|
||
• Promotion for grant programs was done well.
|
||
|
||
• UVA Wise program helped to develop a website.
|
||
|
||
• Mask billboards did well.
|
||
|
||
Marketing
|
||
|
||
3.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Business-related pandemic response
|
||
|
||
What was done well (with
|
||
region's business-related
|
||
pandemic response
|
||
efforts)?
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
Grant funding was well run and distributed effectively.
|
||
|
||
CARES money was distributed well.
|
||
|
||
IDA had funds available quickly. Application process was very easy.
|
||
Turnaround on funds was fast to get people reopened.
|
||
|
||
Grant access was smooth and there was assistance in getting funding.
|
||
PPP distribution was done well. Business wouldn't have survived without
|
||
it.
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau provided me with easy access to funds to build
|
||
our capabilities which allowed me to hire additional workers.
|
||
|
||
Community Response
|
||
|
||
°
|
||
|
||
Board of supervisors were supportive of businesses.
|
||
Help with navigating the language of the mandates.
|
||
|
||
County tourism called to check in on reopening; fairly regular
|
||
communications.
|
||
|
||
Everyone worked together.
|
||
|
||
Overall, good. Proactive reach out.
|
||
|
||
186
|
||
|
||
Health Services
|
||
¢ Did a great job working with local health department on what was
|
||
expected.
|
||
|
||
* Health care stepped up with testing.
|
||
|
||
* Vaccine rollout did well.
|
||
|
||
* Contact with local health department office and covid clinics.
|
||
* Acted quickly to protect the aging population.
|
||
|
||
* Rollout of the vaccines went well.
|
||
|
||
« Hands-on health department. Had active outreach from health
|
||
department for events.
|
||
|
||
Marketing
|
||
|
||
« Promotion for grant programs was done well.
|
||
« UVA Wise program helped to develop a website.
|
||
« Mask billboards did well.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
187
|
||
|
||
3.3 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
COVID-19 Assistance
|
||
|
||
Did you use or receive
|
||
|
||
assistance from
|
||
|
||
pandemic response
|
||
|
||
programs?
|
||
|
||
Funding efforts were routinely
|
||
|
||
mentioned as a highlight of
|
||
|
||
pandemic response in the area. In
|
||
|
||
a future pandemic event, similar
|
||
|
||
types of funding should be made
|
||
|
||
available to business owners.
|
||
|
||
3.3 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
COVID-19 Assistance
|
||
|
||
Cumberland RLF
|
||
Did you use or receive Rebuild VA Program
|
||
assistance from State Grant)
|
||
pandemic response
|
||
programs?
|
||
|
||
/ is IDA Grant
|
||
ce)
|
||
23%
|
||
Funding efforts were routinely
|
||
mentioned as a highlight of
|
||
|
||
pandemic response in the area. In T A
|
||
a future pandemic event, similar own Cares Act Grant
|
||
|
||
types of funding should be made 23%
|
||
available to business owners.
|
||
|
||
187
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
188
|
||
|
||
3.4 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
More Effective Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
Better, more accurate, and more
|
||
|
||
streamlined information was the
|
||
|
||
most frequent suggestion in
|
||
|
||
improving area pandemic response.
|
||
|
||
Even in many of the
|
||
|
||
recommendations around costs,
|
||
|
||
additional information is the key with
|
||
|
||
better information on grant program
|
||
|
||
qualifications and costs associated
|
||
|
||
with a pandemic operating
|
||
|
||
environment. The calls for additional
|
||
|
||
community engagement also echo
|
||
|
||
desires for communication and a
|
||
|
||
streamlined flow of information.
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
• Education component was missing.
|
||
|
||
• Rules and actual business education around response and guideline.
|
||
|
||
• Education on the vaccines was lacking.
|
||
|
||
• More information on actual guidelines as well as information on the
|
||
|
||
reasoning behind those guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Banks not informed of grant guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Better instructions
|
||
|
||
• Not much guidance on how to handle COVID guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• No singular vision for how to handle restrictions and get educated on
|
||
|
||
health needs and safety standards.
|
||
|
||
• No clear leadership from health department on business specific
|
||
|
||
guidelines.
|
||
|
||
• Better information
|
||
|
||
• Difficult to maintain policies for staff and guests due to lack of time, depth
|
||
|
||
of info, lack of clarification.
|
||
|
||
• Target businesses specifically for information.
|
||
|
||
• Need better local information source.
|
||
|
||
• More timely information. Announcements on Friday evenings after close
|
||
|
||
not helpful because you couldn't receive further guidance.
|
||
|
||
Information
|
||
• Would've liked more county support for grants through pandemic and into
|
||
|
||
the future. Matching through VCEDA.
|
||
|
||
• State grant assistance and PPP wasn't sufficient for small business needs
|
||
|
||
• Funding a vocational skills program would have been essential to post
|
||
|
||
pandemic recovery.
|
||
|
||
• Difficulty to get money through larger funds due to restrictions around
|
||
|
||
qualifications.
|
||
|
||
• Resources got a bit swamped, and grant systems got overwhelmed.
|
||
|
||
• Costs went up due to reinvestment in businesses and that wasn't covered
|
||
|
||
by grant funding.
|
||
|
||
• Had to make an investment to meet COVID standards without sufficient
|
||
|
||
funding support for those needs.
|
||
|
||
• Filled out numerous grants but got bumped back due to grant
|
||
|
||
qualifications. Feels like a waste of time.
|
||
|
||
• Help with upfront costs to new business to meet pandemic needs.
|
||
|
||
• People had no information that grant money was being made available.
|
||
|
||
• Needed funding faster.
|
||
|
||
Cost
|
||
|
||
• More involvement from county and town. Feels like business owners are
|
||
|
||
on their own.
|
||
|
||
• Coordination between States (border communities).
|
||
|
||
• Need better regional connection to SBDC.
|
||
|
||
• Needed better pandemic exit strategy.
|
||
|
||
Community Involvement
|
||
• Better promotion and active engagement with marketing materials
|
||
|
||
especially when put online.
|
||
|
||
• Instead of pouring money into individual payments, preferred to see the
|
||
|
||
community colleges funded and staffed with educational programs that
|
||
|
||
can provide skilled workers to the manufacturing industry.
|
||
|
||
• PPE availability.
|
||
|
||
• More testing needed.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
Better, more accurate, and more
|
||
streamlined information was the
|
||
most frequent suggestion in
|
||
improving area pandemic response.
|
||
Even in many of the
|
||
recommendations around costs,
|
||
additional information is the key with
|
||
better information on grant program
|
||
qualifications and costs associated
|
||
with a pandemic operating
|
||
environment. The calls for additional
|
||
community engagement also echo
|
||
desires for communication and a
|
||
streamlined flow of information.
|
||
|
||
3.4 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
More Effective Pandemic Response
|
||
|
||
Information
|
||
|
||
* Education component was missing.
|
||
» Rules and actual business education around response and guideline.
|
||
* Education on the vaccines was lacking.
|
||
|
||
* More information on actual guidelines as well as information on the
|
||
reasoning behind those guidelines.
|
||
|
||
* Banks not informed of grant guidelines.
|
||
* Better instructions
|
||
« Not much guidance on how to handle COVID guidelines.
|
||
|
||
* No singular vision for how to handle restrictions and get educated on
|
||
health needs and safety standards.
|
||
|
||
* No clear leadership from health department on business specific
|
||
guidelines.
|
||
|
||
* Better information
|
||
|
||
° Difficult to maintain policies for staff and guests due to lack of time, depth
|
||
of info, lack of clarification.
|
||
|
||
* Target businesses specifically for information.
|
||
* Need better local information source.
|
||
|
||
« More timely information. Announcements on Friday evenings after close
|
||
not helpful because you couldn't receive further guidance.
|
||
|
||
Community Involvement
|
||
|
||
More involvement from county and town. Feels like business owners are
|
||
on their own.
|
||
|
||
* Coordination between States (border communities).
|
||
« Need better regional connection to SBDC.
|
||
- Needed better pandemic exit strategy.
|
||
|
||
188
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous _
|
||
|
||
Cost
|
||
|
||
* Would've liked more county support for grants through pandemic and into
|
||
|
||
the future. Matching through VCEDA.
|
||
State grant assistance and PPP wasn't sufficient for small business needs
|
||
|
||
Funding a vocational skills program would have been essential to post
|
||
pandemic recovery.
|
||
|
||
Difficulty to get money through larger funds due to restrictions around
|
||
qualifications.
|
||
|
||
Resources got a bit swamped, and grant systems got overwhelmed.
|
||
|
||
Costs went up due to reinvestment in businesses and that wasn't covered
|
||
by grant funding.
|
||
|
||
Had to make an investment to meet COVID standards without sufficient
|
||
funding support for those needs.
|
||
|
||
Filled out numerous grants but got bumped back due to grant
|
||
qualifications. Feels like a waste of time.
|
||
|
||
Help with upfront costs to new business to meet pandemic needs.
|
||
People had no information that grant money was being made available.
|
||
Needed funding faster.
|
||
|
||
Better promotion and active engagement with marketing materials
|
||
especially when put online.
|
||
|
||
Instead of pouring money into individual payments, preferred to see the
|
||
community colleges funded and staffed with educational programs that
|
||
can provide skilled workers to the manufacturing industry.
|
||
|
||
PPE availability.
|
||
More testing needed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
189
|
||
|
||
3.5.1 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Government and Non-Profit
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
Governmental and non-profit
|
||
|
||
organizations expressed better
|
||
|
||
satisfaction with regional
|
||
|
||
communication. This makes them a
|
||
|
||
possible resource to businesses who
|
||
|
||
felt communication was less
|
||
|
||
accessible than they’d hoped.
|
||
|
||
What was done well?
|
||
• Rally calls gathered info and group camaraderie, communication
|
||
|
||
between organizations increased.
|
||
|
||
• Calls together plus individual outreach.
|
||
|
||
• Keeping people updated.
|
||
|
||
• VTC did industry meetings, monthly calls were helpful.
|
||
|
||
• Partnered with UVA WISE, gather regularly to provide a resource
|
||
|
||
for those at high level in the industry within gov and non-profit
|
||
|
||
orgs.
|
||
|
||
• Marketing efforts, pushing people towards time saving tech.
|
||
|
||
• Rally calls were useful for keeping people calm.
|
||
|
||
• Communication and togetherness. We were supported from
|
||
|
||
multiple sources.
|
||
|
||
Communication
|
||
• Comprehensive response.
|
||
|
||
• No complaints
|
||
|
||
• Good job overall
|
||
|
||
• In general, went well.
|
||
|
||
• I think it was handled well.
|
||
|
||
Overall Effort
|
||
|
||
• Funding grants
|
||
|
||
• We were awash in funding to help businesses.
|
||
|
||
Funding
|
||
• Scarecrow campaign.
|
||
|
||
• Followed recommendations from State.
|
||
|
||
• To some extent , quick reaction from business owners.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
3.5.) Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Government and Non-Profit
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
What was done well? Communication Overall Effort
|
||
* Rally calls gathered info and group camaraderie, communication * Comprehensive response.
|
||
between organizations increased. * No complaints
|
||
* Calls together plus individual outreach. * Good job overall
|
||
* Keeping people updated. * In general, went well.
|
||
- VTC did industry meetings, monthly calls were helpful. + | think it was handled well.
|
||
- Partnered with UVA WISE, gather regularly to provide a resource
|
||
for those at high level in the industry within gov and non-profit
|
||
orgs.
|
||
Governmental and non-profit + Marketing efforts, pushing people towards time saving tech.
|
||
organizations expressed better « Rally calls were useful for keeping people calm.
|
||
satisfaction with regional * Communication and togetherness. We were supported from
|
||
|
||
. ge . multiple sources.
|
||
communication. This makes them a
|
||
|
||
possible resource to businesses who Funding Miscellaneous
|
||
felt communication was less * Funding grants * Scarecrow campaign.
|
||
accessible than they’d hoped. » We were awash in funding to help businesses. * Followed recommendations from State.
|
||
|
||
* To some extent , quick reaction from business owners.
|
||
|
||
189
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
190
|
||
|
||
3.5.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Government and Non-Profit
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
Requests for additional clarity from
|
||
|
||
this stakeholder group mostly reveal
|
||
|
||
a desire for a stronger, more
|
||
|
||
centralized regional structure around
|
||
|
||
pandemic response. This group
|
||
|
||
correctly identified the need the
|
||
|
||
business group had for a centralized
|
||
|
||
information source. Additionally, the
|
||
|
||
“Reaction” section further
|
||
|
||
emphasizes the need for a
|
||
|
||
coordinated, regional effort to
|
||
|
||
addressing the appropriate
|
||
|
||
application and timing of pandemic
|
||
|
||
responses.
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
• Lack of clarification and diverse interpretation of information
|
||
|
||
available, clearer direction was needed.
|
||
|
||
• Lots of confusion around qualifications.
|
||
|
||
• Needed clear process.
|
||
|
||
• Could have been a central information source since each county
|
||
|
||
also had its own grants so confusion around criteria.
|
||
|
||
• Early confusion over what would be helpful, try to create a
|
||
|
||
universal application to be able to update each year, have those
|
||
|
||
numbers available, would allow them to know when anything
|
||
|
||
happens what they might be able to do and how they could apply.
|
||
|
||
• Orders came quickly which caused business panic, business
|
||
|
||
adjustments and learning, right way kept changing, trying to stay
|
||
|
||
up to date, and find unified approach.
|
||
|
||
• Lack of steady information, info changed constantly with lots of
|
||
|
||
uncertainty of federal and state info.
|
||
|
||
• More straightforward application.
|
||
|
||
Clarity
|
||
• Had over reaction and then under reaction.
|
||
|
||
• The "shut down" imposed by the State should have been imposed
|
||
|
||
on a regional basis. Our economy was prematurely "shut down"
|
||
|
||
when the virus was not present or at least not prevalent here.
|
||
|
||
• Then when the virus came in the fall residents were fatigued with
|
||
|
||
the limitations. This led to less public cooperation at the critical
|
||
|
||
juncture in October and November.
|
||
|
||
• Ironically, the "shut down" made the problem worse here and
|
||
|
||
prolonged it.
|
||
|
||
• Response delayed due to cases in area delayed.
|
||
|
||
Reaction
|
||
|
||
• I think it was handled well.
|
||
|
||
• Nothing.
|
||
|
||
• I think business response was about right. It was as effective as
|
||
|
||
could be expected.
|
||
|
||
Nothing
|
||
• More community outreach for info in rural areas.
|
||
|
||
• No town representatives to give info for what they can be doing to
|
||
|
||
help the public.
|
||
|
||
• Federal grants need to be prepared in advance.
|
||
|
||
• Banks were having a hard to knowing how to loan and distribute
|
||
|
||
funds; PPP loans were hardest
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
3.5.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Government and Non-Profit
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
What would have made
|
||
the region's business-
|
||
related pandemic
|
||
response efforts more
|
||
effective?
|
||
|
||
Requests for additional clarity from
|
||
this stakeholder group mostly reveal
|
||
a desire for a stronger, more
|
||
centralized regional structure around
|
||
pandemic response. This group
|
||
correctly identified the need the
|
||
business group had for a centralized
|
||
information source. Additionally, the
|
||
“Reaction” section further
|
||
emphasizes the need for a
|
||
coordinated, regional effort to
|
||
addressing the appropriate
|
||
application and timing of pandemic
|
||
responses.
|
||
|
||
Clarity
|
||
|
||
* Lack of clarification and diverse interpretation of information
|
||
available, clearer direction was needed.
|
||
|
||
« Lots of confusion around qualifications.
|
||
- Needed clear process.
|
||
|
||
* Could have been a central information source since each county
|
||
also had its own grants so confusion around criteria.
|
||
|
||
- Early confusion over what would be helpful, try to create a
|
||
universal application to be able to update each year, have those
|
||
numbers available, would allow them to know when anything
|
||
happens what they might be able to do and how they could apply.
|
||
|
||
* Orders came quickly which caused business panic, business
|
||
adjustments and learning, right way kept changing, trying to stay
|
||
up to date, and find unified approach.
|
||
|
||
« Lack of steady information, info changed constantly with lots of
|
||
uncertainty of federal and state info.
|
||
|
||
- More straightforward application.
|
||
|
||
Nothing
|
||
|
||
« | think it was handled well.
|
||
* Nothing.
|
||
|
||
* | think business response was about right. It was as effective as
|
||
could be expected.
|
||
|
||
190
|
||
|
||
Reaction
|
||
* Had over reaction and then under reaction.
|
||
|
||
* The "shut down" imposed by the State should have been imposed
|
||
on a regional basis. Our economy was prematurely "shut down"
|
||
when the virus was not present or at least not prevalent here.
|
||
|
||
* Then when the virus came in the fall residents were fatigued with
|
||
the limitations. This led to less public cooperation at the critical
|
||
juncture in October and November.
|
||
|
||
* lronically, the "shut down" made the problem worse here and
|
||
prolonged it.
|
||
|
||
» Response delayed due to cases in area delayed.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
* More community outreach for info in rural areas.
|
||
|
||
- No town representatives to give info for what they can be doing to
|
||
help the public.
|
||
|
||
« Federal grants need to be prepared in advance.
|
||
|
||
« Banks were having a hard to knowing how to loan and distribute
|
||
funds; PPP loans were hardest
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
191
|
||
|
||
3.6 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Business Responses
|
||
|
||
Businesses received and sought out
|
||
|
||
pandemic response information
|
||
|
||
through a variety of sources. A need
|
||
|
||
appears to guide businesses towards
|
||
|
||
regionally specific and consistently
|
||
|
||
reliable sources of information.
|
||
|
||
Distilling national level restrictions
|
||
|
||
from the CDC may not align with the
|
||
|
||
state level response plan. These
|
||
|
||
discrepancies combined with
|
||
|
||
unofficial sources such as social
|
||
|
||
media and person-to-person
|
||
|
||
communication can lead to
|
||
|
||
businesses picking and choosing
|
||
|
||
strictures to implement.
|
||
|
||
What sources did you
|
||
|
||
use to gain information
|
||
|
||
about pandemic
|
||
|
||
response, guidelines,
|
||
|
||
and recovery resources?
|
||
|
||
• CDC website.
|
||
|
||
• SBA website
|
||
|
||
• County did active outreach.
|
||
|
||
• County website
|
||
|
||
• SBDC
|
||
|
||
• Workforce Development Board
|
||
|
||
• Used small business assistance center at the
|
||
|
||
college.
|
||
|
||
• County officials
|
||
|
||
• Heart of Appalachian pushed out recovery
|
||
|
||
information and grant funding
|
||
|
||
• State briefings
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• Workforce board
|
||
|
||
• Workforce development board
|
||
|
||
• Press releases from governor's office
|
||
|
||
• DCR had updated and recently refreshed
|
||
|
||
documents.
|
||
|
||
• Received information from the county with emails.
|
||
|
||
• IDA let owners know about grant program.
|
||
|
||
• Governor’s press conferences.
|
||
|
||
• Local health department on local guidelines and
|
||
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
• Health department for information.
|
||
|
||
• Straight from health department.
|
||
|
||
• Health department guidance. Although sometimes
|
||
|
||
document would be issued and then changes.
|
||
|
||
• Health department provided information, but also
|
||
|
||
acted as enforcement.
|
||
|
||
Government & Nonprofit
|
||
• Person to person.
|
||
|
||
• Word of mouth
|
||
|
||
• Word of mouth
|
||
|
||
• Lots of word of mouth.
|
||
|
||
Person-to-Person
|
||
|
||
• Online news sources.
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Internet
|
||
|
||
• Emails
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
• Found out about grants through Facebook.
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
Online
|
||
|
||
• CPA did application for PPP.
|
||
|
||
• Information on loans from local banks.
|
||
|
||
• Accountant
|
||
|
||
• Chamber
|
||
|
||
• Chamber emails.
|
||
|
||
• SVAM - Southwest Virginia Association of
|
||
|
||
Manufactures
|
||
|
||
Professionals & Organizations
|
||
|
||
• News
|
||
|
||
• National news but messages were very mixed.
|
||
|
||
• News
|
||
|
||
• General news sources.
|
||
|
||
• Newspaper
|
||
|
||
News
|
||
|
||
• Made a lot of outgoing calls to prepare and
|
||
|
||
ensure within compliance.
|
||
|
||
• Dual state situation required multi-state
|
||
|
||
coordination. KY and VA response differences.
|
||
|
||
• Consultant stayed up on information and
|
||
|
||
pushed that out.
|
||
|
||
• No common leadership sources of information.
|
||
|
||
• Corporate HQ.
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
3.6 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Business Responses
|
||
|
||
What sources did you Government & Nonprofit Person-to-Person News
|
||
. . . CDC website. * Person to person. « News
|
||
use to gain information SBA website * Word of mouth » National news but messages were very mixed.
|
||
|
||
about pandemic
|
||
response, guidelines,
|
||
and recovery resources?
|
||
|
||
Businesses received and sought out
|
||
pandemic response information
|
||
through a variety of sources. A need
|
||
appears to guide businesses towards
|
||
regionally specific and consistently
|
||
reliable sources of information.
|
||
Distilling national level restrictions
|
||
from the CDC may not align with the
|
||
state level response plan. These
|
||
discrepancies combined with
|
||
unofficial sources such as social
|
||
media and person-to-person
|
||
communication can lead to
|
||
businesses picking and choosing
|
||
strictures to implement.
|
||
|
||
County did active outreach.
|
||
County website
|
||
|
||
SBDC
|
||
|
||
Workforce Development Board
|
||
|
||
Used small business assistance center at the
|
||
college.
|
||
|
||
County officials
|
||
|
||
Heart of Appalachian pushed out recovery
|
||
information and grant funding
|
||
|
||
State briefings
|
||
|
||
CDC
|
||
|
||
Workforce board
|
||
|
||
Workforce development board
|
||
|
||
Press releases from governor's office
|
||
|
||
DCR had updated and recently refreshed
|
||
documents.
|
||
|
||
Received information from the county with emails.
|
||
IDA let owners know about grant program.
|
||
Governor's press conferences.
|
||
|
||
Local health department on local guidelines and
|
||
differences.
|
||
|
||
Health department for information.
|
||
Straight from health department.
|
||
|
||
Health department guidance. Although sometimes
|
||
document would be issued and then changes.
|
||
|
||
Health department provided information, but also
|
||
acted as enforcement.
|
||
|
||
191
|
||
|
||
* Word of mouth
|
||
* Lots of word of mouth.
|
||
|
||
Online
|
||
* Online news sources.
|
||
|
||
* Internet
|
||
|
||
* Internet
|
||
|
||
* Internet
|
||
|
||
* Internet
|
||
|
||
* Emails
|
||
|
||
» Facebook
|
||
|
||
» Found out about grants through Facebook.
|
||
» Facebook
|
||
|
||
Professionals & Organizations
|
||
|
||
* CPA did application for PPP.
|
||
* Information on loans from local banks.
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
Accountant
|
||
Chamber
|
||
Chamber emails.
|
||
|
||
SVAM - Southwest Virginia Association of
|
||
Manufactures
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
- News
|
||
» General news sources.
|
||
» Newspaper
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
« Made a lot of outgoing calls to prepare and
|
||
ensure within compliance.
|
||
|
||
* Dual state situation required multi-state
|
||
coordination. KY and VA response differences.
|
||
|
||
* Consultant stayed up on information and
|
||
pushed that out.
|
||
|
||
« No common leadership sources of information.
|
||
* Corporate HQ.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
192
|
||
|
||
3.7 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Information Sources
|
||
|
||
And did you feel
|
||
|
||
adequately informed by
|
||
|
||
those sources?
|
||
|
||
Just under 50% of stakeholders
|
||
|
||
did not feel adequately informed
|
||
|
||
by the multiple sources of
|
||
|
||
information they used to craft their
|
||
|
||
pandemic response.
|
||
|
||
Yes
|
||
|
||
53%
|
||
|
||
3.7 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Information Sources
|
||
|
||
And did you feel
|
||
adequately informed by
|
||
those sources? somewhat
|
||
|
||
29%
|
||
|
||
Just under 50% of stakeholders
|
||
did not feel adequately informed
|
||
by the multiple sources of
|
||
information they used to craft their
|
||
pandemic response.
|
||
|
||
192
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
193
|
||
|
||
3.8 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Government and Non-Profit
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
Government and non-profit entities
|
||
|
||
were more likely to get their
|
||
|
||
information from official sources. All
|
||
|
||
levels of government were consulted
|
||
|
||
which ensures appropriate
|
||
|
||
understanding of differences and
|
||
|
||
similarities in regulation. Fewer types
|
||
|
||
of sources were consulted overall
|
||
|
||
meaning fewer chances to absorb
|
||
|
||
incorrect or unverifiable information.
|
||
|
||
What sources did you
|
||
|
||
use to gain information
|
||
|
||
about pandemic
|
||
|
||
response, guidelines,
|
||
|
||
and recovery resources?
|
||
|
||
• VEDP
|
||
|
||
• Virginia health webpage
|
||
|
||
• SBDC
|
||
|
||
• State Gov
|
||
|
||
• State Government
|
||
|
||
• State government
|
||
|
||
• State
|
||
|
||
• Department of Treasury
|
||
|
||
• VDH
|
||
|
||
• Virginia Department of Health
|
||
|
||
• Governor’s calls were not useful for
|
||
|
||
tourism and funding.
|
||
|
||
• Governor calls were useful for guidelines
|
||
|
||
• Gov. Northam's office
|
||
|
||
• State website
|
||
|
||
• VDH
|
||
|
||
• CICV (Council of Independent Colleges in
|
||
|
||
Virginia)
|
||
|
||
State Government
|
||
• County
|
||
|
||
• County Administration
|
||
|
||
• County emergency management
|
||
|
||
• County administrator
|
||
|
||
• Local gov’t website
|
||
|
||
• Health Departments
|
||
|
||
• Health department
|
||
|
||
• Local Health Department
|
||
|
||
Local Government
|
||
|
||
• Federal website
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• CDC
|
||
|
||
• Federal Government
|
||
|
||
• Federal Government
|
||
|
||
Federal Government
|
||
|
||
• Social media
|
||
|
||
• Facebook
|
||
|
||
• Social media
|
||
|
||
• Industry tourism group on Facebook
|
||
|
||
Social Media
|
||
|
||
• Downtown happy hours.
|
||
|
||
• RALLY calls
|
||
|
||
• Internal communications
|
||
|
||
• Pharmacy school
|
||
|
||
• Large restaurant chain
|
||
|
||
• Private organizations
|
||
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
||
|
||
3.8 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Government and Non-Profit
|
||
|
||
Responses
|
||
|
||
What sources did you State Government Local Government Social Media
|
||
|
||
t - f ti »« VEDP * County * Social media
|
||
use to gain inrormation * Virginia health webpage * County Administration * Facebook
|
||
about pandemic + SBDC * County emergency management + Social media
|
||
response, g uidel i nes, * State Gov * County administrator * Industry tourism group on Facebook
|
||
|
||
* State Government * Local gov’t website
|
||
and recovery resources? ° State government * Health Departments
|
||
. . ° State * Health department
|
||
Government and non-profit entities * Department of Treasury * Local Health Department
|
||
were more likely to get their + VDH
|
||
information from official sources. All * Virginia Department of Health
|
||
levels of government were consulted + Governor's calls were not useful for Federal Government Miscellaneous
|
||
: : tourism and funding. « Federal website * Downtown happy hours.
|
||
which ensures appropriate * Governor calls were useful for guidelines * CDC * RALLY calls
|
||
understanding of differences and * Gov. Northam's office * CDC + Internal communications
|
||
similarities in regulation. Fewer types + State website * CDC » Pharmacy school
|
||
of sources were consulted overall * VDH * cbc * Large restaurant chain
|
||
meaning fewer chances to absorb . vicy (Council of Independent Colleges in * Federal Government « Private organizations
|
||
irginia) + Federal Government
|
||
|
||
incorrect or unverifiable information.
|
||
|
||
193
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
194
|
||
|
||
3.9.1 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Source Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
And did you feel
|
||
|
||
adequately informed by
|
||
|
||
those sources?
|
||
|
||
Governments and non-profits felt
|
||
|
||
better informed by fewer, higher
|
||
|
||
quality sources than did their
|
||
|
||
business sector counterparts.
|
||
|
||
3.9.) Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Source Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
And did you feel
|
||
adequately informed by
|
||
those sources?
|
||
|
||
Governments and non-profits felt
|
||
|
||
better informed by fewer, higher
|
||
uality sources than did their
|
||
|
||
many No 7%
|
||
|
||
business sector counterparts.
|
||
|
||
Sometimes
|
||
|
||
21%
|
||
|
||
194
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
195
|
||
|
||
3.9.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Source Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
Did you feel you played a
|
||
|
||
leadership role in
|
||
|
||
pandemic response in
|
||
|
||
your sector?
|
||
|
||
All felt they had played at least
|
||
|
||
some kind of leadership role
|
||
|
||
during the pandemic. This was
|
||
|
||
supported by the mentions of
|
||
|
||
assistance in information and
|
||
|
||
distribution of funding and
|
||
|
||
community togetherness by
|
||
|
||
business stakeholders.
|
||
|
||
3.9.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Source Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
Did you feel you played a
|
||
leadership role in
|
||
pandemic response in
|
||
your sector?
|
||
|
||
All felt they had played at least
|
||
some kind of leadership role
|
||
during the pandemic. This was
|
||
seustanceininfornaton ane 12%
|
||
distribution of funding and
|
||
community togetherness by
|
||
business stakeholders.
|
||
|
||
To Some Degree
|
||
|
||
195
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
196
|
||
|
||
3.10 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Role Capability
|
||
|
||
And did you feel capable
|
||
|
||
in that role?
|
||
|
||
Again, this group expressed a
|
||
|
||
majority feeling capable in a
|
||
|
||
leadership role during the
|
||
|
||
pandemic. This would indicate that
|
||
|
||
this group is ready to take on
|
||
|
||
additional leadership roles
|
||
|
||
especially if they are more officially
|
||
|
||
designated to act in that capacity.
|
||
|
||
3.10 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Role Capability
|
||
|
||
And did you feel capable
|
||
in that role?
|
||
|
||
Again, this group expressed a
|
||
majority feeling capable in a
|
||
leadership role during the
|
||
pandemic. This would indicate that No
|
||
|
||
this group is ready to take on oO
|
||
additional leadership roles 13 to
|
||
|
||
especially if they are more officially
|
||
designated to act in that capacity. Sometimes
|
||
|
||
19%
|
||
|
||
196
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
197
|
||
|
||
3.11 Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
|
||
Pandemic scenarios are highly changeable with approaches evolving as more information is discovered,
|
||
|
||
new medical advances are made, and political decision making continues. During the COVID-19
|
||
|
||
pandemic, different states have taken widely varied approaches within the bounds of national
|
||
|
||
recommendations and regulations to varying degrees of success in controlling spread and continuation
|
||
|
||
of business operations and tourism.
|
||
|
||
Due to this inherent variability, the most important planning adjustment for the Cumberland Plateau is to
|
||
|
||
create a communications structure that allows information to be passed quickly and effectively.
|
||
|
||
Information should be aggregated from reliable sources by government entities which already have a
|
||
|
||
community presence and then distributed throughout the region.
|
||
|
||
3.11 Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
Response
|
||
|
||
Pandemic scenarios are highly changeable with approaches evolving as more information is discovered,
|
||
new medical advances are made, and political decision making continues. During the COVID-19
|
||
pandemic, different states have taken widely varied approaches within the bounds of national
|
||
recommendations and regulations to varying degrees of success in controlling spread and continuation
|
||
of business operations and tourism.
|
||
|
||
Due to this inherent variability, the most important planning adjustment for the Cumberland Plateau is to
|
||
create a communications structure that allows information to be passed quickly and effectively.
|
||
Information should be aggregated from reliable sources by government entities which already have a
|
||
community presence and then distributed throughout the region.
|
||
|
||
197
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
198
|
||
|
||
3.11 Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and Response
|
||
|
||
3.1] Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and Response
|
||
|
||
NATIONAL )
|
||
POLICY
|
||
|
||
7 ® N (FSi \
|
||
; y (Si nage &
|
||
\ ae \ Advertising
|
||
CT s
|
||
|
||
oo
|
||
|
||
\ (Clearinghouse
|
||
Yo aN x
|
||
'( Business)
|
||
|
||
a
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
199
|
||
|
||
3.13 Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
|
||
Response
|
||
|
||
The Pandemic Action Board should consist of the following representative members:
|
||
|
||
• A tourism administration representative from each county
|
||
|
||
• Virginia Department of Health
|
||
|
||
• Restaurants
|
||
|
||
• Accommodations
|
||
|
||
• Retail
|
||
|
||
• Outdoor recreation
|
||
|
||
• Cultural attractions
|
||
|
||
These representatives would meet bi-weekly to determine regional strategy. They could assess new
|
||
|
||
information from reputable sources but also check in with industry representatives to determine how
|
||
|
||
policy measures are impacting tourism industry businesses.
|
||
|
||
3.13 Recommendations
|
||
COVID-19 Management and
|
||
Response
|
||
|
||
The Pandemic Action Board should consist of the following representative members:
|
||
|
||
¢ A tourism administration representative from each county
|
||
¢ Virginia Department of Health
|
||
|
||
e Restaurants
|
||
|
||
* Accommodations
|
||
|
||
* Retail
|
||
|
||
* Outdoor recreation
|
||
|
||
¢ Cultural attractions
|
||
|
||
These representatives would meet bi-weekly to determine regional strategy. They could assess new
|
||
information from reputable sources but also check in with industry representatives to determine how
|
||
policy measures are impacting tourism industry businesses.
|
||
|
||
199
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
4.0 Tourism Asset Proposal
|
||
|
||
4.0 Tourism Asset Proposal
|
||
|
||
HICKEYGLOBAL
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
201
|
||
|
||
4.1.1 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
What would the event entail?
|
||
|
||
A 4 day (long weekend) bicycle rally that tours the Cumberland Plateau region with stopover nights in
|
||
|
||
each county that include events such as small festivals celebrating local culture or music festivals
|
||
|
||
highlighting local bands:
|
||
|
||
• The route would include a night in each of the four Cumberland Plateau region counties.
|
||
|
||
• Cyclists would ride from county to county and then set up to camp on arrival.
|
||
|
||
• This event is not intended to be a race, so attractions along the route such as food vendors, natural wonders, and
|
||
|
||
cultural landmarks can be incorporated as stopping points.
|
||
|
||
• Each host destination would have a nighttime activity to welcome cyclists to the destination. This way, the event
|
||
|
||
takes on the characteristic of being a roving festival as opposed to a bike race or a biking only event.
|
||
|
||
• Additional, non-cyclist tourists can be incorporated into the fun by allowing them to attend destination events without
|
||
|
||
cycling.
|
||
|
||
• This event should be ticketed to assist destinations in covering costs associated with hosting and cleanup. Non-
|
||
|
||
cyclist tourists should also be ticketed to attend festival events.
|
||
|
||
• As a start point, the region should hold this event every 3-4 years to give adequate time for planning, area
|
||
|
||
development, and partnership building.
|
||
|
||
• In between events, the route with associated agritourism and heritage tourism stops could be made available online
|
||
|
||
and through a brochure to act as a semi-permanent touring route for those visiting the area.
|
||
|
||
4.\.1| Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
What would the event entail?
|
||
|
||
A 4 day (long weekend) bicycle rally that tours the Cumberland Plateau region with stopover nights in
|
||
each county that include events such as small festivals celebrating local culture or music festivals
|
||
highlighting local bands:
|
||
|
||
The route would include a night in each of the four Cumberland Plateau region counties.
|
||
Cyclists would ride from county to county and then set up to camp on arrival.
|
||
|
||
This event is not intended to be a race, so attractions along the route such as food vendors, natural wonders, and
|
||
cultural landmarks can be incorporated as stopping points.
|
||
|
||
Each host destination would have a nighttime activity to welcome cyclists to the destination. This way, the event
|
||
takes on the characteristic of being a roving festival as opposed to a bike race or a biking only event.
|
||
|
||
Additional, non-cyclist tourists can be incorporated into the fun by allowing them to attend destination events without
|
||
cycling.
|
||
|
||
This event should be ticketed to assist destinations in covering costs associated with hosting and cleanup. Non-
|
||
cyclist tourists should also be ticketed to attend festival events.
|
||
|
||
As a start point, the region should hold this event every 3-4 years to give adequate time for planning, area
|
||
development, and partnership building.
|
||
|
||
In between events, the route with associated agritourism and heritage tourism stops could be made available online
|
||
and through a brochure to act as a semi-permanent touring route for those visiting the area.
|
||
|
||
201
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
202
|
||
|
||
4.1.2 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Benefits to the region
|
||
|
||
• Opportunity to highlight natural beauty of the region
|
||
|
||
• Way to introduce tourists to the region who already have an interest in outdoor recreation
|
||
|
||
• Chance to highlight areas which are developing as tourism destinations or new assets of the region
|
||
|
||
• Aligns with region’s already developed goals and plans for the region in supporting small,
|
||
|
||
entrepreneurial tourism businesses and creative economies planning.
|
||
|
||
• Provides ample partnership opportunities to strengthen regional tourism cooperation
|
||
|
||
• Stopover nights and stops along the route allow highlights of local food and culture
|
||
|
||
• Makes the region seem inherently more accessible by giving tourists a pre-defined access route
|
||
|
||
• Supports infrastructure development goals and tourism development goals for the region that are
|
||
|
||
beneficial to tourists and residents
|
||
|
||
4.\.2 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Benefits to the region
|
||
¢ Opportunity to highlight natural beauty of the region
|
||
e Way to introduce tourists to the region who already have an interest in outdoor recreation
|
||
¢ Chance to highlight areas which are developing as tourism destinations or new assets of the region
|
||
|
||
¢ Aligns with region’s already developed goals and plans for the region in supporting small,
|
||
entrepreneurial tourism businesses and creative economies planning.
|
||
|
||
¢ Provides ample partnership opportunities to strengthen regional tourism cooperation
|
||
e Stopover nights and stops along the route allow highlights of local food and culture
|
||
¢ Makes the region seem inherently more accessible by giving tourists a pre-defined access route
|
||
|
||
¢ Supports infrastructure development goals and tourism development goals for the region that are
|
||
beneficial to tourists and residents
|
||
|
||
202
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
203
|
||
|
||
4.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
Shift in Tourist Demographics
|
||
|
||
This event speaks to the
|
||
|
||
demographics shifts that have been
|
||
|
||
observed at a national level in
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation as well as at the
|
||
|
||
local level. This event incorporates
|
||
|
||
camping, which has grown in
|
||
|
||
popularity, focuses on the region’s
|
||
|
||
natural assets which are a draw for
|
||
|
||
those in more urban environments,
|
||
|
||
and is a more active event speaking
|
||
|
||
to the younger and more outdoorsy
|
||
|
||
demographics currently exploring the
|
||
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
Have you seen a shift in
|
||
|
||
tourist demographics
|
||
|
||
during the pandemic?
|
||
|
||
(Examples include age,
|
||
|
||
income, location of
|
||
|
||
origin, interests upon
|
||
|
||
arrival, etc.)
|
||
|
||
• Usually pulling from neighboring states.
|
||
|
||
• 50% of business comes from VA and KY
|
||
|
||
• Pandemic changes not particularly high. Still seeing similar
|
||
|
||
demographics.
|
||
|
||
• Big boom in camping. Shifted slightly more local during pandemic.
|
||
|
||
• Ongoing shift away from older, less experienced community
|
||
|
||
toward more outdoorsy and younger demographic.
|
||
|
||
• Emphasis on natural assets as opposed to the facilities.
|
||
|
||
• Anecdotal increase in rock climbing.
|
||
|
||
• Classic destinations are getting crowded, so people are spreading
|
||
|
||
out. Getting away urban and crowding.
|
||
|
||
• Mostly returning guests from NC and Ohio. Have seen a pandemic
|
||
|
||
uptick from Pike County and Lecher County KY.
|
||
|
||
• Shift towards farther flung markets. Heavy influx from NY. Major
|
||
|
||
draw was the ATV trails.
|
||
|
||
• Most travelers outside of the immediate area are coming from
|
||
|
||
outside of the state entirely. Lots of NC, SC, PA, OH
|
||
|
||
• Not much shift
|
||
|
||
Observations
|
||
|
||
4.2 Stakeholder Feedback
|
||
|
||
Shiff in Tourist Demographics
|
||
|
||
Have you seen a shift in
|
||
tourist demographics
|
||
during the pandemic?
|
||
(Examples include age,
|
||
income, location of
|
||
origin, interests upon
|
||
|
||
antival: EtG to the
|
||
|
||
demographics shifts that have been
|
||
observed at a national level in
|
||
outdoor recreation as well as at the
|
||
local level. This event incorporates
|
||
camping, which has grown in
|
||
popularity, focuses on the region’s
|
||
natural assets which are a draw for
|
||
those in more urban environments,
|
||
and is a more active event speaking
|
||
to the younger and more outdoorsy
|
||
demographics currently exploring the
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
Observations
|
||
|
||
Usually pulling from neighboring states.
|
||
50% of business comes from VA and KY
|
||
|
||
Pandemic changes not particularly high. Still seeing similar
|
||
demographics.
|
||
|
||
Big boom in camping. Shifted slightly more local during pandemic.
|
||
|
||
Ongoing shift away from older, less experienced community
|
||
toward more outdoorsy and younger demographic.
|
||
|
||
Emphasis on natural assets as opposed to the facilities.
|
||
Anecdotal increase in rock climbing.
|
||
|
||
Classic destinations are getting crowded, so people are spreading
|
||
out. Getting away urban and crowding.
|
||
|
||
Mostly returning guests from NC and Ohio. Have seen a pandemic
|
||
uptick from Pike County and Lecher County KY.
|
||
|
||
Shift towards farther flung markets. Heavy influx from NY. Major
|
||
draw was the ATV trails.
|
||
|
||
Most travelers outside of the immediate area are coming from
|
||
outside of the state entirely. Lots of NC, SC, PA, OH
|
||
|
||
Not much shift
|
||
|
||
203
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
204
|
||
|
||
4.3 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
This event is designed to specifically
|
||
|
||
speak to stakeholder feedback.
|
||
|
||
These elements mentioned in
|
||
|
||
feedback can be enhanced or
|
||
|
||
supported by holding this bike
|
||
|
||
festival.
|
||
|
||
• Outdoor industry businesses who put a high
|
||
|
||
value on quality of life.
|
||
|
||
Government & Nonprofit
|
||
• More regional approach to activities with
|
||
|
||
rotation between recreation sources.
|
||
|
||
• Additional activities in the park area.
|
||
|
||
• Could use community guide for helping to
|
||
|
||
start new businesses.
|
||
|
||
• Need additional signage to find trailheads
|
||
|
||
and parking areas for hiking
|
||
|
||
Tourism Specific:
|
||
|
||
• Remoteness, difficulty of travel to the area.
|
||
|
||
People expect short drive to everything.
|
||
|
||
• Lots to do in area but need willingness to
|
||
|
||
drive.
|
||
|
||
• Some people aren't willing to make the
|
||
|
||
drive to get to these places.
|
||
|
||
• Roads, and the difficulty of getting to the
|
||
|
||
site.
|
||
|
||
Accessibility
|
||
|
||
• More modernization but maintaining
|
||
|
||
community historic beauty.
|
||
|
||
• Natural beauty preserved.
|
||
|
||
• Trashcans and dumping out on the side of the
|
||
|
||
road need to go.
|
||
|
||
• Clean up the community a bit.
|
||
|
||
Tourism and Business:
|
||
|
||
• More tourism friendly- pushing out into the
|
||
|
||
community with signage and
|
||
|
||
communication from major tourism draws
|
||
|
||
which already exist.
|
||
|
||
• See outdoor activities become the center
|
||
|
||
piece of the community's tourism efforts.
|
||
|
||
• Opportunities for local people to become
|
||
|
||
entrepreneurs in outdoor industry.
|
||
|
||
• Additional emphasis on the tourism
|
||
|
||
market.
|
||
|
||
• Bike shops.
|
||
|
||
• More services to capture people once their
|
||
|
||
already here.
|
||
|
||
• More inter-county cooperation in tourism
|
||
|
||
• Trail expansion
|
||
|
||
• A destination for trails and camping.
|
||
|
||
Strong Tourism Economy
|
||
|
||
• Expanded tourism and recreation
|
||
|
||
opportunities for the public.
|
||
|
||
• Welcoming area with tourism economy.
|
||
|
||
• Heart of Appalachia itinerary planning
|
||
|
||
including day trips working out from other
|
||
|
||
attractions outside the area.
|
||
|
||
Expanded Tourism
|
||
|
||
4.3 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
This event is designed to specifically Government & Nonprofit Tourism Specific: Strong Tourism Economy
|
||
speak to stakeholder feedback. * Outdoor industry businesses who put a high . More regional approach to activities with ° More tourism friendly- pushing out into the
|
||
. ; value on quality of life. rotation between recreation sources. community with signage and
|
||
These elements mentioned in + Additional activities in the park area. communication from major tourism draws
|
||
feedback can be enhanced or * Could use community guide for helping to which already exist,
|
||
start new businesses. * See outdoor activities become the center
|
||
|
||
supported by holding this bike
|
||
|
||
« Need additional signage to find trailheads piece of the community's tourism efforts.
|
||
|
||
festival. Expanded Tourism and parking areas for hiking + Opportunities for local people to become
|
||
- Expanded tourism and recreation entrepreneurs in outdoor industry.
|
||
opportunities for the public. + Additional emphasis on the tourism
|
||
* Welcoming area with tourism economy. market.
|
||
° Heart of Appalachia itinerary planning - Bike shops.
|
||
including day trips working out from other + More services to capture people once their
|
||
attractions outside the area. already here.
|
||
|
||
A ibilit » More inter-county cooperation in tourism
|
||
|
||
» Remoteness, difficulty of travel to the area. | Trail .
|
||
People expect short drive to everything. rall expansion
|
||
|
||
Tourism and Business: + Lots to do in area but need willingness to * “destination for trails and camping.
|
||
« More modernization but maintaining drive.
|
||
community historic beauty. ° Some people aren't willing to make the
|
||
|
||
- Natural beauty preserved. drive to get to these places.
|
||
|
||
* Trashcans and dumping out on the side of the + Roads, and the difficulty of getting to the
|
||
road need to go. site.
|
||
|
||
* Clean up the community a bit.
|
||
|
||
204
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
205
|
||
|
||
4.4.1 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Host stopover locations will need:
|
||
|
||
Large area for tent camping
|
||
|
||
• At least a portion should be available year-round for trail
|
||
|
||
continuation
|
||
|
||
Restaurants or ability to get food trucks or stands Sells
|
||
|
||
packaged goods for travel
|
||
|
||
• Participating vendors should offer at least one locally distinctive
|
||
|
||
dish for the event
|
||
|
||
Outdoor venue space for nighttime activity
|
||
|
||
• This could be the same area as the one used for camping if
|
||
|
||
enough space exists
|
||
|
||
• This space should be incorporated into the closest main street
|
||
|
||
area
|
||
|
||
Road accessibility suitable for bikes
|
||
|
||
• This can be provided at either a restaurant location or at a grocery
|
||
|
||
store
|
||
|
||
• A local alcohol offering should be available along with nationally
|
||
|
||
recognized brands
|
||
|
||
Space for those not biking
|
||
|
||
• Additional space should be incorporated for participation in
|
||
|
||
stopover events and camping
|
||
|
||
A key asset the location hopes to showcase
|
||
|
||
• A key asset the location hopes to showcase
|
||
|
||
4.4.| Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Host stopover locations will need:
|
||
|
||
» Large area for tent camping >» Road accessibility suitable for bikes
|
||
e Atleast a portion should be available year-round for trail e This can be provided at either a restaurant location or at a grocery
|
||
continuation store
|
||
|
||
e A local alcohol offering should be available along with nationally
|
||
> Restaurants or ability to get food trucks or stands Sells recognized brands
|
||
|
||
packaged goods for travel
|
||
e Participating vendors should offer at least one locally distinctive » Space for those not biking
|
||
|
||
dish for the event e Additional space should be incorporated for participation in
|
||
> Outdoor venue space for nighttime activity stopover events and camping
|
||
e This could be the same area as the one used for camping if
|
||
enough space exists >» Akey asset the location hopes to showcase
|
||
e This space should be incorporated into the closest main street e A key asset the location hopes to showcase
|
||
|
||
area
|
||
|
||
205
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
206
|
||
|
||
4.4.2 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Pandemic Resiliency
|
||
|
||
Event is held entirely outdoors
|
||
|
||
Outdoor recreation is seen as highly desirable in a pandemic
|
||
|
||
environment
|
||
|
||
It can be easily accessed from key source markets by car
|
||
|
||
which contributes to pandemic resiliency.
|
||
|
||
Can provide a communal environment while still adhering to
|
||
|
||
distancing guidelines
|
||
|
||
Participation can remain affordable with participants able to
|
||
|
||
choose level of involvement and length of stay
|
||
|
||
Meets pandemic use preferences of new outdoor recreation
|
||
|
||
participants with opportunities for time in nature, a relaxed
|
||
|
||
pace, and food tourism integration which appeals to the
|
||
|
||
younger demographics getting involved.
|
||
|
||
4.4.2 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Pandemic Resiliency
|
||
|
||
» Event is held entirely outdoors >» Participation can remain affordable with participants able to
|
||
choose level of involvement and length of stay
|
||
|
||
» Outdoor recreation is seen as highly desirable in a pandemic
|
||
|
||
environment >» Meets pandemic use preferences of new outdoor recreation
|
||
participants with opportunities for time in nature, a relaxed
|
||
» It can be easily accessed from key source markets by car pace, and food tourism integration which appeals to the
|
||
which contributes to pandemic resiliency. younger demographics getting involved.
|
||
|
||
» Can provide a communal environment while still adhering to
|
||
distancing guidelines
|
||
|
||
206
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
207
|
||
|
||
4.4.3 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Needed Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
❑ Roads must be suitable for packs of bikes to travel along
|
||
|
||
❑Medical services available to cyclists
|
||
|
||
❑ Trash collection services at campsites and along routes
|
||
|
||
❑ Toilet facilities along route
|
||
|
||
❑Wayfinding signage
|
||
|
||
❑ Possible partial road closures or reroutes for biker safety
|
||
|
||
❑ Pre-rally beautification and route cleanup
|
||
|
||
• Road maintenance, wayfinding signage, and
|
||
|
||
pre-route beautification can all be leveraged for
|
||
|
||
year-round viability. These were all stake-
|
||
|
||
holder identified needs during surveying.
|
||
|
||
• These points can be used to encourage
|
||
|
||
destinations to maintain a “tourist ready” status
|
||
|
||
where the area is clean, well signposted, and
|
||
|
||
roads are well maintained for best access.
|
||
|
||
These community beautification and
|
||
|
||
infrastructure initiatives were identified by
|
||
|
||
business, tourism specific, and government and
|
||
|
||
non-profit stakeholders.
|
||
|
||
4.4.3 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Needed Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
_] Roads must be suitable for packs of bikes to travel along » Road maintenance, wayfinding signage, and
|
||
pre-route beautification can all be leveraged for
|
||
|
||
year-round viability. These were all stake-
|
||
holder identified needs during surveying.
|
||
|
||
_) Medical services available to cyclists
|
||
_] Trash collection services at campsites and along routes
|
||
|
||
I Toilet facilities along route e These points can be used to encourage
|
||
|
||
—! Wayfinding signage destinations to maintain a “tourist ready” status
|
||
_] Possible partial road closures or reroutes for biker safety where the area is clean, well signposted, and
|
||
roads are well maintained for best access.
|
||
These community beautification and
|
||
infrastructure initiatives were identified by
|
||
business, tourism specific, and government and
|
||
non-profit stakeholders.
|
||
|
||
LJ Pre-rally beautification and route cleanup
|
||
|
||
207
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
208
|
||
|
||
4.5 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Partnership Potential
|
||
|
||
The rally could directly engage the following partners:
|
||
|
||
• The Crooked Road to host local music events at stopovers
|
||
|
||
• Local small businesses for prizes or booths
|
||
|
||
• Local food producers and food trucks and restaurants to have
|
||
|
||
food available at stopovers
|
||
|
||
• As this is not a bike race, there are opportunities for agritourism
|
||
|
||
stops along the main route
|
||
|
||
• Local volunteers and non-profit organizations should be worked
|
||
|
||
with to sponsor nighttime events, coordinate set up, and assist
|
||
|
||
with cleanup
|
||
|
||
• Regional partnership between tourism boards and highlighted
|
||
|
||
areas
|
||
|
||
• Larger manufacturing and industrial businesses for event
|
||
|
||
sponsorship opportunities
|
||
|
||
All of these partnerships necessitate the type of regional
|
||
|
||
cooperation and small business support that stakeholders
|
||
|
||
included in their long term vision of the area. The festival
|
||
|
||
could serve as an industry anchor and introduce tourists to
|
||
|
||
the communities and associated businesses there that are
|
||
|
||
ready to welcome tourists and grow tourist presence. This list
|
||
|
||
is not exhaustive but can be used as a start point for seeking
|
||
|
||
event partners
|
||
|
||
4.5 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Partnership Potential
|
||
|
||
» The rally could directly engage the following partners:
|
||
e The Crooked Road to host local music events at stopovers
|
||
|
||
Local food p
|
||
ood availab
|
||
|
||
Local small businesses for prizes or booths
|
||
|
||
roducers and food trucks and restaurants to have
|
||
e at stopovers
|
||
|
||
As this is not a bike race, there are opportunities for agritourism
|
||
|
||
stops along
|
||
|
||
he main route
|
||
|
||
Local volunteers and non-profit organizations should be worked
|
||
|
||
with to sponsor nighttime events, coordinate set up, and assist
|
||
with cleanup
|
||
Regional partnership between tourism boards and highlighted
|
||
|
||
areas
|
||
|
||
Larger manufacturing and industrial businesses for event
|
||
|
||
sponsorship
|
||
|
||
opportunities
|
||
|
||
> All of these partnerships necessitate the type of regional
|
||
|
||
208
|
||
|
||
cooperation and small business support that stakeholders
|
||
included in their long term vision of the area. The festival
|
||
could serve as an industry anchor and introduce tourists to
|
||
the communities and associated businesses there that are
|
||
ready to welcome tourists and grow tourist presence. This list
|
||
is not exhaustive but can be used as a start point for seeking
|
||
event partners
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
209
|
||
|
||
4.6 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Location
|
||
• The bike route should run through all four
|
||
|
||
counties in the CPPDC region
|
||
|
||
• The route can be redone every 4 years when
|
||
|
||
the race is run to highlight new tourism
|
||
|
||
development and bring attention to target areas
|
||
|
||
for tourism development
|
||
|
||
• Ideally each leg should run 30-50mi to remain
|
||
|
||
accessible to mid-level bikers
|
||
|
||
• This asset map can be used as a start point for
|
||
|
||
currently developed route options.
|
||
|
||
Accommodation
|
||
|
||
Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
Historical Site
|
||
|
||
Museum
|
||
|
||
Other
|
||
|
||
Park
|
||
|
||
Trail
|
||
|
||
4.6 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Freebum
|
||
|
||
Whameliffe
|
||
|
||
Zebulon McVeigh
|
||
un aq \
|
||
|
||
peed
|
||
|
||
Pikeville [1441 Pike County ReSe Day
|
||
asl aoe Roderfield
|
||
Shelbiana \_ Wéich
|
||
ral 7 KAY 4 McDowell County
|
||
. Belcher
|
||
|
||
War,
|
||
2 16
|
||
Berwind
|
||
|
||
Jewell Valley
|
||
|
||
ee
|
||
|
||
Be S25 0%
|
||
®o
|
||
|
||
}__—_Coebum™—_,
|
||
|
||
on County Broadions
|
||
|
||
Allison Gap
|
||
|
||
Dungannon
|
||
|
||
\
|
||
|
||
"critic
|
||
|
||
‘
|
||
Meadowview ‘
|
||
|
||
Glade Spring-e~ —
|
||
|
||
kmore
|
||
Nickelsville S
|
||
kt Countyl72 Washington County
|
||
|
||
ze + aan l5R *~
|
||
|
||
Maybeury
|
||
Gai
|
||
Bradshaw. TA ry 4 \ Montcalm
|
||
Anawalt
|
||
83 24 ine
|
||
|
||
. Smyth Ss
|
||
|
||
ar
|
||
|
||
’
|
||
~ Arista
|
||
|
||
Kimball
|
||
|
||
all Crumpler, + Matoaka~ |
|
||
Ear f' Mercer Coil
|
||
|
||
Be =s
|
||
|
||
Marion
|
||
|
||
Sugar Grove
|
||
|
||
209
|
||
|
||
¢ The bike route should run through all four
|
||
counties in the CPPDC region
|
||
|
||
¢ The route can be redone every 4 years when
|
||
the race is run to highlight new tourism
|
||
development and bring attention to target areas
|
||
for tourism development
|
||
|
||
¢ Ideally each leg should run 30-50mi to remain
|
||
accessible to mid-level bikers
|
||
|
||
¢ This asset map can be used as a start point for
|
||
|
||
currently developed route options.
|
||
|
||
e@ Accommodation
|
||
|
||
e@ Campgrounds
|
||
|
||
e@ Historical Site
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
210
|
||
|
||
4.7 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Time of Year and a Note on Seasonality
|
||
|
||
• This event could be used to extend regional seasonality. As the area seeks to establish itself better
|
||
|
||
as a tourism destination, having a season opening event or season closing event can extend the
|
||
|
||
time period in which the region is presented to tourists as open and viable for outdoor recreation.
|
||
|
||
• Other cycling events of larger scale start as early as April and are largely concluded by mid-
|
||
|
||
November.
|
||
|
||
• As this would be an entirely outdoor event, caution must be taken as to selecting a time where the
|
||
|
||
weather is likely to be good. Good weather in this case should be defined as unlikely to cause
|
||
|
||
hazardous conditions. This would include road conditions as well as health factors like risk of heat
|
||
|
||
stroke.
|
||
|
||
• If the route is posted online and published as a brochure which highlights attractions along the way
|
||
|
||
and the route itself as an informal bike touring trail for the region, this provides year-round use
|
||
|
||
options for individual travelers
|
||
|
||
4./ Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Time of Year and a Note on Seasonality
|
||
|
||
¢ This event could be used to extend regional seasonality. As the area seeks to establish itself better
|
||
as a tourism destination, having a season opening event or season closing event can extend the
|
||
time period in which the region is presented to tourists as open and viable for outdoor recreation.
|
||
|
||
¢ Other cycling events of larger scale start as early as April and are largely concluded by mid-
|
||
November.
|
||
|
||
¢ As this would be an entirely outdoor event, caution must be taken as to selecting a time where the
|
||
weather is likely to be good. Good weather in this case should be defined as unlikely to cause
|
||
hazardous conditions. This would include road conditions as well as health factors like risk of heat
|
||
stroke.
|
||
|
||
¢ If the route is posted online and published as a brochure which highlights attractions along the way
|
||
and the route itself as an informal bike touring trail for the region, this provides year-round use
|
||
options for individual travelers
|
||
|
||
210
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
211
|
||
|
||
4.8.1 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Predicted Economic Impact
|
||
|
||
• The average cyclist to the Shenandoah Valley
|
||
|
||
was found to generate $155 per person per day
|
||
|
||
in direct spending.
|
||
|
||
• Assuming a fairly conservative participation
|
||
|
||
number of 200 cyclists this festival would
|
||
|
||
generate $124,000 in direct spending before
|
||
|
||
ticket price.
|
||
|
||
• A recommended ticket price for this event
|
||
|
||
would be $250 per cyclist generating an
|
||
|
||
additional $50,000 in spending.
|
||
|
||
• Using the Shenandoah Valley’s modeling,
|
||
|
||
another $52,200 would be likely in indirect
|
||
|
||
impact and $43,500 in induced impact
|
||
|
||
SPENDING TYPE ESTIMATED DOLLAR AMOUNT
|
||
|
||
Direct Spending $124,000
|
||
|
||
Ticket Revenue $50,000
|
||
|
||
Indirect Impact $52,200
|
||
|
||
Induced Impact $43,500
|
||
|
||
Total Predict Impact from
|
||
Cyclists
|
||
|
||
$269,700
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
4.8.1 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Predicted Economic Impact
|
||
|
||
° The average cyclist to the Shenandoah Valley
|
||
was found to generate $155 per person per day
|
||
in direct spending.
|
||
|
||
e Assuming a fairly conservative participation
|
||
number of 200 cyclists this festival would
|
||
generate $124,000 in direct spending before
|
||
ticket price.
|
||
|
||
e A recommended ticket price for this event
|
||
would be $250 per cyclist generating an
|
||
additional $50,000 in spending.
|
||
|
||
e Using the Shenandoah Valley’s modeling,
|
||
another $52,200 would be likely in indirect
|
||
impact and $43,500 in induced impact
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
SPENDING TYPE | ESTIMATED DOLLAR AMOUNT
|
||
Direct Spending $124,000
|
||
Ticket Revenue $50,000
|
||
|
||
Indirect Impact $52,200
|
||
Induced Impact $43,500
|
||
|
||
$269,700
|
||
|
||
Total Predict Impact from
|
||
|
||
Cyclists
|
||
|
||
211
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
212
|
||
|
||
4.8.2 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Predicted Economic Impact
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
Additional spending associated with this event would be likely
|
||
|
||
considering the increased spend of:
|
||
|
||
• The nighttime events and festivals
|
||
|
||
• Non-cyclist, festival-only participants
|
||
|
||
The economic reach of this event is likely to extend beyond
|
||
|
||
the festival itself by prompting return visits to the area for
|
||
|
||
outdoor recreation.
|
||
|
||
The structure of this festival with overnight stays in the region
|
||
|
||
assured also eliminates most traditional sources of tourism
|
||
|
||
leakage.
|
||
|
||
The event would also have additional economic impacts by
|
||
|
||
establishing the Cumberland Plateau as a destination in
|
||
|
||
Virginia for cycling. The Shenandoah Valley found a total
|
||
|
||
annual impact from cycling tourism to be $13.6 million. By
|
||
|
||
hosting this event, the Cumberland Plateau would position
|
||
|
||
itself to see these higher annual economic impact numbers
|
||
|
||
from cycling tourism.
|
||
|
||
4.8.2 Cumberland Plateau Bike Rally
|
||
|
||
A Festival on Two Wheels
|
||
|
||
Predicted Economic Impact
|
||
|
||
» Additional spending associated with this event would be likely
|
||
|
||
considering the increased spend of:
|
||
e The nighttime events and festivals
|
||
e Non-cyclist, festival-only participants
|
||
|
||
» The economic reach of this event is likely to extend beyond
|
||
the festival itself by prompting return visits to the area for
|
||
outdoor recreation.
|
||
|
||
>» The event would also have additional economic impacts by
|
||
|
||
» The structure of this festival with overnight stays in the region
|
||
|
||
assured also eliminates most traditional sources of tourism
|
||
leakage.
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
establishing the Cumberland Plateau as a destination in
|
||
Virginia for cycling. The Shenandoah Valley found a total
|
||
annual impact from cycling tourism to be $13.6 million. By
|
||
hosting this event, the Cumberland Plateau would position
|
||
itself to see these higher annual economic impact numbers
|
||
from cycling tourism.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
213
|
||
|
||
4.9.1 Additional Ideas
|
||
EDA Travel, Tourism and Outdoor
|
||
|
||
Recreation Funding
|
||
|
||
To be developed as part of Tourism Master Plan
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
Water access for fishing and kayaking could grow to become
|
||
|
||
a key asset for the area.
|
||
|
||
Additional water access is needed throughout the county to
|
||
|
||
accommodate activity usage without threatening native
|
||
|
||
species.
|
||
|
||
EDA grant funding in conjunction with the American Rescue
|
||
|
||
Plan could be used to create a water trails system.
|
||
|
||
This trail network should be connected where possible to
|
||
|
||
allow for multi-day water trips. However, the trail system can
|
||
|
||
also just be a regionally organized series of trails.
|
||
|
||
Continued access should be actively planned for including
|
||
|
||
ownership planning for boat launches, access ramps, and
|
||
|
||
fishing platforms or piers.
|
||
|
||
4.9.\| Additional ldeas
|
||
|
||
EDA Travel, Tourism and Outdoor
|
||
Recreation Funding
|
||
|
||
To be developed as part of Tourism Master Plan
|
||
|
||
» Water access for fishing and kayaking could grow to become > This trail network should be connected where possible to
|
||
a key asset for the area. allow for multi-day water trips. However, the trail system can
|
||
|
||
also just be a regionally organized series of trails.
|
||
» Additional water access is needed throughout the county to
|
||
accommodate activity usage without threatening native » Continued access should be actively planned for including
|
||
species. ownership planning for boat launches, access ramps, and
|
||
fishing platforms or piers.
|
||
» EDA grant funding in conjunction with the American Rescue
|
||
Plan could be used to create a water trails system.
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
213
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
214
|
||
|
||
4.9.2 Additional Ideas
|
||
EDA Travel, Tourism and Outdoor
|
||
|
||
Recreation Funding
|
||
|
||
Idea for future mine closure
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
If there is a mine or quarry closure which leaves an open pit
|
||
|
||
style area, it could potentially be developed into a mining
|
||
|
||
play park.
|
||
|
||
This could follow a similar model to Diggerland USA, but with
|
||
|
||
a regionally specific mining theme allowing young people to
|
||
|
||
use heavy machinery and mining equipment under
|
||
|
||
appropriate supervision.
|
||
|
||
Similar mining adventure tours have been implemented in
|
||
|
||
Australia in the Central Deborah Mine to great success with
|
||
|
||
active drilling demonstrations and surface tours where
|
||
|
||
people enjoy the experience of getting to look into a pit mine.
|
||
|
||
These types of developments provide job opportunities for
|
||
|
||
displaced workers who have experience with heavy
|
||
|
||
machinery.
|
||
|
||
Image: diggerlandusa.org
|
||
|
||
4.9.2 Additional ldeas
|
||
|
||
EDA Travel, Tourism and Outdoor
|
||
Recreation Funding
|
||
|
||
Idea for future mine closure
|
||
|
||
» If there is a mine or quarry closure which leaves an open pit
|
||
style area, it could potentially be developed into a mining
|
||
play park.
|
||
|
||
» This could follow a similar model to Diggerland USA, but with
|
||
a regionally specific mining theme allowing young people to
|
||
use heavy machinery and mining equipment under
|
||
appropriate supervision.
|
||
|
||
>» Similar mining adventure tours have been implemented in
|
||
Australia in the Central Deborah Mine to great success with
|
||
active drilling demonstrations and surface tours where
|
||
people enjoy the experience of getting to look into a pit mine.
|
||
|
||
» These types of developments provide job opportunities for
|
||
displaced workers who have experience with heavy
|
||
machinery.
|
||
|
||
Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission. (2016). The Economic Impact of Bicycling in the Central Shenandoah Valley.
|
||
|
||
214
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Proprietary & Confidential © 2021 Hickey Global. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
Title
|
||
|
||
Date
|
||
|
||
Company name or logoBarry I. Matherly, CEcD, FM, HLM
|
||
|
||
President & CEO, Hickey Global
|
||
|
||
+1 917-410-4626
|
||
|
||
bmatherly@hickeyglobal.com
|
||
|
||
125 Park Avenue, 25th Floor
|
||
|
||
New York, NY 10017
|
||
|
||
hickeyglobal.com
|
||
|
||
mailto:bmatherly@hickeyglobal.com
|
||
http://www.hickeyglobal.com/
|
||
Barry I. Matherly, CEcD, FM, HLM
|
||
|
||
President & CEO, Hickey Global
|
||
+1 917-410-4626
|
||
|
||
bmatherly@hickeyglobal.com
|
||
|
||
125 Park Avenue, 25th Floor
|
||
New York, NY 10017
|
||
|
||
ogo!
|
||
|
||
hickeyglobal.com
|
||
|
||
HICKEY GLOBAL
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
|