forked from nm3clol/nm3clol-public
9745 lines
268 KiB
Markdown
9745 lines
268 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
type: document
|
||
title: Richlands-RCL-Comp-Plan-Current-Draft-Copyas-of-12-01-16D
|
||
file: ../Richlands-RCL-Comp-Plan-Current-Draft-Copyas-of-12-01-16D.pdf
|
||
tags:
|
||
- Cumberland_Plateau_Planning_District_Commission
|
||
docDate: null
|
||
contentType: application/pdf
|
||
contentLength: 4087490
|
||
sha256sum: 46530d56108186e25db69b497fb71dc0220c776db5586fd3d7cd3acac0976ad5
|
||
sha1sum: 16d183948e8a5c6e30d8eb34216db5da6eed8ab2
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
CONTENTS
|
||
|
||
|
||
1 Introduction ......................................................................... 1
|
||
|
||
1.1 Purpose ............................................................................ 1
|
||
|
||
1.2 Authority .......................................................................... 1
|
||
|
||
1.3 Community Input ............................................................. 2
|
||
|
||
1.3.1 Community Survey ................................................... 2
|
||
|
||
1.3.2 Public Input Meeting ................................................ 3
|
||
|
||
1.3.3 Summary of Community Input ................................. 4
|
||
|
||
2 Background .......................................................................... 5
|
||
|
||
2.1 Population and Age .......................................................... 5
|
||
|
||
2.2 Housing ............................................................................ 8
|
||
|
||
2.3 Historic and Cultural Resources ..................................... 11
|
||
|
||
2.3.1 History .................................................................... 11
|
||
|
||
2.3.2 Arts, Culture & Events ............................................ 13
|
||
|
||
2.4 Environmental Resources .............................................. 16
|
||
|
||
2.4.1 Forest Resources .................................................... 16
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Hydrology and Water Resources ........................... 16
|
||
|
||
2.4.3 Mineral & Energy Resources .................................. 18
|
||
|
||
2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning ......................................... 20
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 Historic Development Patterns .............................. 20
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Existing Land Use ................................................... 20
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Existing Zoning ....................................................... 23
|
||
|
||
2.6 Economy ......................................................................... 25
|
||
|
||
2.7 Community Services, Facilities & Utilities ...................... 31
|
||
|
||
2.7.1 Recreation & Tourism ............................................ 31
|
||
|
||
2.7.2 Public Safety ........................................................... 32
|
||
|
||
2.7.3 Public Works ........................................................... 33
|
||
|
||
2.7.4 Water/Wastewater Utilities ................................... 33
|
||
|
||
2.7.5 Electric Utility ......................................................... 34
|
||
|
||
2.7.6 Gas Utility ............................................................... 35
|
||
|
||
2.8 Transportation ............................................................... 36
|
||
|
||
2.8.1 Roadway Functional Classifications ....................... 36
|
||
|
||
2.8.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes ....................................... 36
|
||
|
||
2.8.3 Alternative Transportation Options ....................... 37
|
||
|
||
3 The Plan .............................................................................. 39
|
||
|
||
3.1 Vision .............................................................................. 39
|
||
|
||
3.2 Plan Structure ................................................................. 39
|
||
|
||
3.3 Land Use & Development .............................................. 41
|
||
|
||
3.4 Housing & Neighborhoods ............................................. 43
|
||
|
||
3.5 Economic Development ................................................. 45
|
||
|
||
3.6 Community Services, Facilities & Utilities ...................... 47
|
||
|
||
3.6.1 Public Safety ........................................................... 47
|
||
|
||
3.6.2 Water/Wastewater Utilities ................................... 47
|
||
|
||
3.6.3 Streets and Roads................................................... 48
|
||
|
||
3.6.4 Sanitation ............................................................... 48
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
CONTENTS 2.6 Economy,
|
||
|
||
2.7 Community Services, Facilities & Utilities...
|
||
|
||
1 Introduction... 1 2.7.1 Recreation & Tourism.......
|
||
11 Purpose. 1 2.7.2 Public Safety... 32
|
||
1.2 Authority... 1 2.7.3. Public Works... 33
|
||
1.3. Community Input... 2 2.7.4 Water/Wastewater Utilities. 33
|
||
1.3.1 Community Survey... 2 2.75 — Electric utility. 34
|
||
1.3.2 Public Input Meeting 3 2.7.6 Gas Utility 35
|
||
1.3.3. Summary of Community Input: 4 2.8 Transportation ..rcnennnnnsnnnnnnennennnnseennnee 36
|
||
2 Background. 2.8.1 Roadway Functional Classifications -...-nennee 36
|
||
2.1 Population and Age.... 2.8.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes... 36
|
||
2.2 Housing... 2.8.3 Alternative Transportation Options .....nnnnnee 37
|
||
2.3. Historic and Cultural Resources... 3 Te Plan wnesnnnnnnnnnnninnnnnnnnnnnsnnnnnsseenne 39
|
||
2.3.1 History 3.1 Vision... 39
|
||
2.3.2 Arts, Culture & Events 3B 3.2 Plan Structure. 39
|
||
|
||
2.4 Environmental RESOUrCeS ....cucseotcnesnee 16 3.3 Land Use & Development...
|
||
|
||
2.4.1 Forest Resources...
|
||
|
||
3.4 Housing & Neighborhoods...
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Hydrology and Water Resources. 3.5 Economic Development...
|
||
|
||
2.4.3 Mineral & Energy Resources... 3.6 Community Services, Facilities & Utilities...
|
||
|
||
2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning. 3.6.1 Public Safety. 47
|
||
2.5.1 Historic Development Pattern: 3.6.2 Water/Wastewater Utilities. 47
|
||
2.5.2 Existing Land Use ..... 3.6.3 Streets and Roads. 48
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Existing Zoning ..... 3.6.4 Sanitation
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3.6.5 Electric Utility ......................................................... 49
|
||
|
||
3.7 Transportation ............................................................... 51
|
||
|
||
4 Implementation ................................................................ 57
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
MAPS
|
||
|
||
Existing Land Use .......................................................... after page 22
|
||
|
||
Environmental Constraints ........................................... after page 22
|
||
|
||
Land Suitable for Development .................................... after page 22
|
||
|
||
Existing Zoning .............................................................. after page 24
|
||
|
||
Nonconforming Land uses ............................................ after page 24
|
||
|
||
VDOT Functional Classifications .................................... after page 38
|
||
|
||
Average Annual Daily Traffic ......................................... after page 38
|
||
|
||
Alternative Transportation Options .............................. after page 38
|
||
|
||
Future Land Use ............................................................ after page 42
|
||
|
||
Transportation Improvement Plans .............................. after page 52
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
FIGURES
|
||
|
||
Figure 1: Population Change ................................................... page 5
|
||
|
||
Figure 2: Tazewell Co. – Western & Northwestern District .... page 5
|
||
|
||
Figure 3: Population Change – Neighboring Areas ................. page 6
|
||
|
||
Figure 4: Population Projections ............................................. page 6
|
||
|
||
Figure 5: Projected Population in Tazewell County by Age .... page 6
|
||
|
||
Figure 6: School Enrollment .................................................... page 7
|
||
|
||
Figure 7: Housing Units ........................................................... page 8
|
||
|
||
Figure 8: Households ............................................................... page 8
|
||
|
||
Figure 9: Housing Occupancy .................................................. page 9
|
||
|
||
Figure 10: Housing Tenure ...................................................... page 9
|
||
|
||
Figure 11: Value of Owner-Occupied Housing ........................ page 9
|
||
|
||
Figure 12: Impaired Bodies of Water .................................... page 17
|
||
|
||
Figure 13: Existing Lang Use .................................................. page 21
|
||
|
||
Figure 14: Employment by Industry ...................................... page 25
|
||
|
||
Figure 15: Location Quotient by Sector 2014 ....................... page 26
|
||
|
||
Figure 16: 2004-2014 Employment Change .......................... page 27
|
||
|
||
Figure 17: 1980-2010 Virginia Coal Industry Trends ............. page 27
|
||
|
||
Figure 18: Total Town Employment ...................................... page 28
|
||
|
||
Figure 19: Town Employment Trends ................................... page 29
|
||
|
||
Figure 20: Richlands Subarea of Enterprise Zone ................. page 30
|
||
|
||
Figure 21: VDOT Functional Classifications in Richlands ....... page 36
|
||
|
||
Figure 22: Means of Transportation to Work 2009-2013 ..... page 37
|
||
|
||
Figure 23: Total Bus Trips per Year ....................................... page 38
|
||
|
||
Figure 24: Project Capital Costs (subtables a-i) .............. pages 47-49
|
||
|
||
Figure 25: Priority Road Projects in Current Regional Plan ... page 51
|
||
|
||
Figure 26: Road Projects in Previous SYIP through 2022 ...... page 52
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
3.65 Electric Utility.....
|
||
|
||
3.7 Transportation .
|
||
|
||
4 Implementation...
|
||
|
||
MAPS
|
||
Existing Land Use .... after page 22
|
||
|
||
Environmental Constraints . after page 22
|
||
|
||
Land Suitable for Development. after page 22
|
||
|
||
Existing Zoning... after page 24
|
||
|
||
Nonconforming Land uses... after page 24
|
||
|
||
VDOT Functional Classifications.. after page 38
|
||
|
||
‘Average Annual Daily Traffic. after page 38
|
||
|
||
Alternative Transportation Options... . after page 38
|
||
|
||
Future Land Use..... after page 42
|
||
|
||
Transportation Improvement Plans... after page 52
|
||
|
||
FIGURES
|
||
Figure 1: Population Change page 5
|
||
Figure 2: Tazewell Co. - Western & Northwestern District....page 5
|
||
|
||
Figure 3: Population Change — Neighboring Areas...
|
||
|
||
Figure 4: Population Projections..
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 5: Projected Population in Tazewell County by Age ....page 6
|
||
|
||
Figure 6: School Enrollment
|
||
|
||
Figure 7: Housing Units
|
||
Figure 8: Households...
|
||
|
||
Figure 9: Housing Occupancy.
|
||
|
||
Figure 10: Housing Tenure...
|
||
Figure 11: Value of Owner-Occupied Housing
|
||
Figure 12: Impaired Bodies of Water....
|
||
Figure 13: Existing Lang Use...
|
||
|
||
Figure 14: Employment by Industry
|
||
|
||
Figure 15: Location Quotient by Sector 2014
|
||
|
||
Figure 16: 2004-2014 Employment Change...
|
||
Figure 17: 1980-2010 Virginia Coal Industry Trends...
|
||
|
||
Figure 18: Total Town Employment...
|
||
Figure 19: Town Employment Trends...
|
||
Figure 20: Richlands Subarea of Enterprise Zone ....
|
||
Figure 21: VDOT Fun
|
||
|
||
nal Classifications in Richlands......page 36
|
||
Figure 22: Means of Transportation to Work 2009-2013......page 37
|
||
|
||
Figure 23: Total Bus Trips per Year .. -page 38
|
||
|
||
Figure 24: Project Capital Costs (subtables a). pages 47-49
|
||
|
||
Figure 25: Priority Road Projects in Current Regional Plan...page 51
|
||
Figure 26: Road Projects in Previous SYIP through 2022......page 52
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
1 INTRODUCTION
|
||
|
||
1.1 PURPOSE
|
||
This Comprehensive Plan is a guide for the physical development of
|
||
|
||
the Town of Richlands for the next ten years. It addresses the entire
|
||
|
||
Town and is intended to positively influence all of the physical
|
||
|
||
elements which make up its form. Towards this end, the overriding
|
||
|
||
purpose of the Plan is to encourage the continued development of
|
||
|
||
a safe, healthy and prosperous community by offering a distinctive
|
||
|
||
“vision” for the Town.
|
||
|
||
A Comprehensive Plan represents the most important public
|
||
|
||
document for orchestrating growth and development in the years
|
||
|
||
ahead. It establishes goals, objectives, and strategies to guide both
|
||
|
||
civic and public activities related to land use and resource utilization
|
||
|
||
for a minimum of ten years and up to twenty years. Though a
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan outlines a long-term vision, it is not static. It is
|
||
|
||
meant to be a “living document” – continually reviewed and
|
||
|
||
updated with a major update at least every five years per the Code
|
||
|
||
of Virginia based on changing conditions and shifting resources.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, a Comprehensive Plan is only as good as the tools and
|
||
|
||
actions utilized in implementing the plans on the ground. It only
|
||
|
||
really comes to life as action plans and specific project plans are
|
||
|
||
developed and implemented.
|
||
|
||
1.2 AUTHORITY
|
||
Chapter 22 of Title 15.2 in the Code of Virginia grants local
|
||
|
||
governments distinct powers and responsibilities to plan for future
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
growth and regulate the existing use of land within their
|
||
|
||
jurisdictions. One primary way this is accomplished is through the
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan. Section 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia
|
||
|
||
mandates that:
|
||
|
||
The local planning commission shall prepare and
|
||
|
||
recommend a comprehensive plan for the physical
|
||
|
||
development of the territory within its jurisdiction and
|
||
|
||
every governing body shall adopt a comprehensive
|
||
|
||
plan for the territory under its jurisdiction.
|
||
|
||
The Planning Commission of the Town of Richlands is tasked with
|
||
|
||
the responsibility of preparing the Plan and recommending the plan
|
||
|
||
for adoption by Town Council.
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Comprehensive Plan was developed in the context of
|
||
|
||
large shifts in the local and regional economy as the mining industry
|
||
|
||
continues to decline. These changes create ripples that impact
|
||
|
||
population, housing, public services and transportation and require
|
||
|
||
a plan that identifies opportunities for new growth and the best use
|
||
|
||
of land within the Town boundaries. Because of the need to
|
||
|
||
understand these changes and their ripples, background data and
|
||
|
||
data analysis make up a large part of this document. Such
|
||
|
||
information is an essential element to any planning process and key
|
||
|
||
to creating a Comprehensive Plan that is on target and useful.
|
||
|
||
Equally essential to the planning process and the “jumping off”
|
||
|
||
place for a Comprehensive Plan is community input, the subject of
|
||
|
||
the next sub-section of this plan.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
1 INTRODUCTION
|
||
|
||
1.1 PURPOSE
|
||
|
||
This Comprehensive Plan is a guide for the physical development of
|
||
the Town of Richlands for the next ten years. It addresses the entire
|
||
Town and is intended to positively influence all of the physical
|
||
elements which make up its form. Towards this end, the overriding
|
||
purpose of the Plan is to encourage the continued development of
|
||
a safe, healthy and prosperous community by offering a distinctive
|
||
“vision” for the Town.
|
||
|
||
A Comprehensive Plan represents the most important public
|
||
document for orchestrating growth and development in the years
|
||
ahead. It establishes goals, objectives, and strategies to guide both
|
||
civic and public activities related to land use and resource utilization
|
||
for a minimum of ten years and up to twenty years. Though a
|
||
Comprehensive Plan outlines a long-term vision, it is not static. Itis
|
||
meant to be a “living document” — continually reviewed and
|
||
updated with a major update at least every five years per the Code
|
||
of Virginia based on changing conditions and shifting resources.
|
||
Additionally, a Comprehensive Plan is only as good as the tools and
|
||
actions utilized in implementing the plans on the ground. It only
|
||
really comes to life as action plans and specific project plans are
|
||
developed and implemented.
|
||
|
||
1.2 AUTHORITY
|
||
Chapter 22 of Title 15.2 in the Code of Virginia grants local
|
||
governments distinct powers and responsibilities to plan for future
|
||
|
||
growth and regulate the existing use of land within their
|
||
jurisdictions. One primary way this is accomplished is through the
|
||
Comprehensive Plan. Section 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia
|
||
mandates that:
|
||
|
||
The local planning commission shall prepare and
|
||
recommend a comprehensive plan for the physical
|
||
development of the territory within its jurisdiction and
|
||
every governing body shall adopt a comprehensive
|
||
plan for the territory under its jurisdiction.
|
||
|
||
The Planning Commission of the Town of Richlands is tasked with
|
||
the responsibility of preparing the Plan and recommending the plan
|
||
for adoption by Town Council.
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Comprehensive Plan was developed in the context of
|
||
large shifts in the local and regional economy as the mining industry
|
||
continues to decline. These changes create ripples that impact
|
||
population, housing, public services and transportation and require
|
||
a plan that identifies opportunities for new growth and the best use
|
||
of land within the Town boundaries. Because of the need to
|
||
understand these changes and their ripples, background data and
|
||
data analysis make up a large part of this document. Such
|
||
information is an essential element to any planning process and key
|
||
to creating a Comprehensive Plan that is on target and useful.
|
||
|
||
Equally essential to the planning process and the “jumping off”
|
||
place for a Comprehensive Plan is community input, the subject of
|
||
the next sub-section of this plan.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
1.3 COMMUNITY INPUT
|
||
|
||
1.3.1 Community Survey
|
||
|
||
A community survey was created to better understand citizen
|
||
|
||
values and specific opinions on public services, housing, recreation
|
||
|
||
and the local economy. 151 paper and 54 online surveys were
|
||
|
||
received over the course of 3 months in the fall/winter of 2015-
|
||
|
||
2016. Three-quarters of survey respondents were residents of
|
||
|
||
Richlands, a third work in Richlands, and two-thirds shop in the
|
||
|
||
Town. Respondents of the paper survey were older, with a quarter
|
||
|
||
of them retired, and only half currently employed. Whereas, 85%
|
||
|
||
of online survey respondents were employed and a little over half
|
||
|
||
of them had children. A majority of respondents had family ties
|
||
|
||
and/or were raised in Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Through these surveys it was determined that respondents were
|
||
|
||
generally pleased with essential Town services, but would gladly
|
||
|
||
welcome enhanced recreational opportunities, a more vibrant local
|
||
|
||
economy, and improved housing options and conditions for all
|
||
|
||
residents. A summary of all survey responses is found in the
|
||
|
||
appendices to this plan.
|
||
|
||
Town Problems
|
||
|
||
Survey respondents were asked to specify what they personally
|
||
|
||
believed were the three biggest problems in Richlands among a list
|
||
|
||
of twelve choices with the option of writing in an “other” choice.
|
||
|
||
The three most common problems chosen were lack of jobs as the
|
||
|
||
top choice, drugs as the second choice, and lack of restaurants,
|
||
|
||
stores and services as third. Lack of activities and events was the
|
||
|
||
only other option chosen more than a quarter of the time as a
|
||
|
||
current problem. Several also stated that Town leadership was
|
||
|
||
inadequate and lacked unity within and cooperation with the larger
|
||
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
Housing
|
||
|
||
Only 15% of residents and other respondents felt that poor housing
|
||
|
||
conditions was one of the largest problems, but most agreed that
|
||
|
||
derelict housing and housing in disrepair is an issue to be addressed.
|
||
|
||
Many strongly agreed that more affordable housing options should
|
||
|
||
exist for the elderly, and disagreed that there should be more
|
||
|
||
mobile homes to meet housing needs. Respondents also agreed
|
||
|
||
that more single-family homes should be made available to meet
|
||
|
||
housing needs in the Town.
|
||
|
||
Town Services
|
||
|
||
Respondents were generally satisfied with Town services. Fire and
|
||
|
||
rescue services and police were listed as the most admired services.
|
||
|
||
Experiences with the water, sewer, and electrical utilities were
|
||
|
||
somewhat less satisfactory.
|
||
|
||
Recreation
|
||
|
||
The overall sentiment of respondents regarding recreation was that
|
||
|
||
services and facilities are fairly adequate, but need to be better
|
||
|
||
maintained and updated. Additionally, respondents indicated that
|
||
|
||
the Town should add more recreational opportunities for youth and
|
||
|
||
elderly alike. Residents and Town visitors expressed that they
|
||
|
||
would welcome more playgrounds, more picnic facilities, and more
|
||
|
||
hiking/biking trails specifically along the Clinch River, as long as they
|
||
|
||
were better maintained. Many respondents would like to see safe
|
||
|
||
walking trails, more communal gathering spaces, and recreational
|
||
|
||
clubs become the cornerstone of leisure in Richlands. Respondents
|
||
|
||
also thought that there needs to be more cultural activities that
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
1.3. Community INPUT
|
||
|
||
1.3.1 Community Survey
|
||
|
||
‘A community survey was created to better understand citizen
|
||
values and specific opinions on public services, housing, recreation
|
||
and the local economy. 151 paper and 54 online surveys were
|
||
received over the course of 3 months in the fall/winter of 2015-
|
||
2016. Three-quarters of survey respondents were residents of
|
||
Richlands, a third work in Richlands, and two-thirds shop in the
|
||
Town. Respondents of the paper survey were older, with a quarter
|
||
of them retired, and only half currently employed. Whereas, 85%
|
||
of online survey respondents were employed and a little over half
|
||
of them had children, A majority of respondents had family ties
|
||
and/or were raised in Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Through these surveys it was determined that respondents were
|
||
generally pleased with essential Town services, but would gladly
|
||
welcome enhanced recreational opportunities, a more vibrant local
|
||
economy, and improved housing options and conditions for all
|
||
residents. A summary of all survey responses is found in the
|
||
appendices to this plan.
|
||
|
||
Town Problems
|
||
Survey respondents were asked to specify what they personally
|
||
believed were the three biggest problems in Richlands among a list
|
||
of twelve choices with the option of writing in an “other” choice.
|
||
The three most common problems chosen were lack of jobs as the
|
||
top choice, drugs as the second choice, and lack of restaurants,
|
||
stores and services as third. Lack of activities and events was the
|
||
only other option chosen more than a quarter of the time as a
|
||
current problem. Several also stated that Town leadership was
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
inadequate and lacked unity within and cooperation with the larger
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
Housing
|
||
Only 15% of residents and other respondents felt that poor housing
|
||
conditions was one of the largest problems, but most agreed that
|
||
derelict housing and housing in disrepair is an issue to be addressed.
|
||
Many strongly agreed that more affordable housing options should
|
||
exist for the elderly, and disagreed that there should be more
|
||
mobile homes to meet housing needs. Respondents also agreed
|
||
that more single-family homes should be made available to meet
|
||
housing needs in the Town.
|
||
|
||
Town Services
|
||
Respondents were generally satisfied with Town services. Fire and
|
||
rescue services and police were listed as the most admired services.
|
||
Experiences with the water, sewer, and electrical utilities were
|
||
somewhat less satisfactory.
|
||
|
||
Recreation
|
||
The overall sentiment of respondents regarding recreation was that
|
||
services and facilities are fairly adequate, but need to be better
|
||
maintained and updated. Additionally, respondents indicated that
|
||
the Town should add more recreational opportunities for youth and
|
||
elderly alike. Residents and Town visitors expressed that they
|
||
would welcome more playgrounds, more picnic facilities, and more
|
||
hiking/biking trails specifically along the Clinch River, as long as they
|
||
were better maintained. Many respondents would like to see safe
|
||
walking trails, more communal gathering spaces, and recreational
|
||
clubs become the cornerstone of leisure in Richlands. Respondents
|
||
also thought that there needs to be more cultural activities that
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3
|
||
|
||
celebrate the Town’s art and history to attract more visitors and
|
||
|
||
expand tourism revenue.
|
||
|
||
1.3.2 Public Input Meeting
|
||
|
||
To gather public input, the
|
||
|
||
Town held a comprehensive
|
||
|
||
planning workshop on the
|
||
|
||
evening of December 1st, 2015
|
||
|
||
to dialogue about the future
|
||
|
||
direction of the Town and to
|
||
|
||
create a community vision.
|
||
|
||
About thirty local residents
|
||
|
||
and business owners were in
|
||
|
||
attendance. The input re-
|
||
|
||
ceived on a series of subjects
|
||
|
||
is as follows:
|
||
|
||
Housing and Neighborhoods
|
||
|
||
The negative impact of vacant
|
||
|
||
and blighted buildings was the
|
||
|
||
most common response to
|
||
|
||
questions about housing and
|
||
|
||
neighborhoods. The residents
|
||
|
||
in attendance strongly support community clean-up efforts,
|
||
|
||
specifically in the west end of Town. Another common theme was
|
||
|
||
the desire for better housing options, especially for elderly
|
||
|
||
residents. Respondents wanted to see housing that was still
|
||
|
||
affordable, but offered better alternatives than aging manufactured
|
||
|
||
housing such as stick-built housing and retirement communities.
|
||
|
||
Calls for better housing options also came with the acknowledge-
|
||
|
||
ment that improved housing is difficult if household incomes do not
|
||
|
||
improve.
|
||
|
||
Getting Around Town (Transportation)
|
||
|
||
Residents in attendance noted the lack of street lights in certain
|
||
|
||
areas of Town and the poor condition of sidewalks, especially in the
|
||
|
||
west end.
|
||
|
||
Recreation and Culture
|
||
|
||
A predominant theme expressed by those in attendance was the
|
||
|
||
desire for increased events and recreational activities. Attendees
|
||
|
||
noted several reasons to do so: economic development, options for
|
||
|
||
youth/teens and attracting new residents. The second most
|
||
|
||
common theme was the need to better leverage existing
|
||
|
||
recreational assets. Suggestions included: hosting sports tourna-
|
||
|
||
ments, updating Richlands Recreation Park (as a draw for the
|
||
|
||
region), improving the condition of Critterville and completing plans
|
||
|
||
already started for the Riverwalk Trail.
|
||
|
||
Local Economy
|
||
|
||
To solicit input on the Richlands economy, residents were asked to
|
||
|
||
finish the statement: “The future of Richlands’ economy depends on
|
||
|
||
_______.” Responses were divided between four general answers.
|
||
|
||
Some attendees noted the need to focus on downtown
|
||
|
||
revitalization as a driver for new business and outside visitors. Some
|
||
|
||
saw the growth of the elderly population as an economic
|
||
|
||
opportunity to innovate and expand services. Some noted that new
|
||
|
||
jobs must pay better wages. A final, but equally common response
|
||
|
||
was a concern that there was not strong enough vision, unity and
|
||
|
||
cooperation to drive new economic development opportunities.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
celebrate the Town’s art and history to attract more visitors and
|
||
expand tourism revenue.
|
||
|
||
1.3.2 Public Input Meeting
|
||
To gather public input, the
|
||
Town held a comprehensive
|
||
planning workshop on the
|
||
evening of December 1%, 2015
|
||
to dialogue about the future
|
||
direction of the Town and to
|
||
create a community vision,
|
||
About thirty local residents
|
||
and business owners were in
|
||
attendance. The input re-
|
||
ceived on a series of subjects
|
||
is as follows:
|
||
|
||
Housing and Neighborhoods
|
||
The negative impact of vacant,
|
||
and blighted buildings was the
|
||
most common response to
|
||
questions about housing and
|
||
neighborhoods. The residents
|
||
in attendance strongly support community clean-up efforts,
|
||
specifically in the west end of Town. Another common theme was
|
||
the desire for better housing options, especially for elderly
|
||
residents. Respondents wanted to see housing that was still
|
||
affordable, but offered better alternatives than aging manufactured
|
||
housing such as stick-built housing and retirement communities.
|
||
Calls for better housing options also came with the acknowledge-
|
||
|
||
ment that improved housing is difficult if household incomes do not
|
||
improve.
|
||
|
||
Getting Around Town (Transportation)
|
||
|
||
Residents in attendance noted the lack of street lights in certain
|
||
areas of Town and the poor condition of sidewalks, especially in the
|
||
west end.
|
||
|
||
Recreation and Culture
|
||
|
||
‘A predominant theme expressed by those in attendance was the
|
||
desire for increased events and recreational activities. Attendees
|
||
noted several reasons to do so: economic development, options for
|
||
youth/teens and attracting new residents. The second most
|
||
common theme was the need to better leverage existing
|
||
recreational assets. Suggestions included: hosting sports tourna-
|
||
ments, updating Richlands Recreation Park (as a draw for the
|
||
region), improving the condition of Critterville and completing plans
|
||
already started for the Riverwalk Trail.
|
||
|
||
Local Economy
|
||
To solicit input on the Richlands economy, residents were asked to
|
||
finish the statement: “The future of Richlands’ economy depends on
|
||
”” Responses were divided between four general answers.
|
||
Some attendees noted the need to focus on downtown
|
||
revitalization as a driver for new business and outside visitors. Some
|
||
saw the growth of the elderly population as an economic
|
||
opportunity to innovate and expand services. Some noted that new
|
||
jobs must pay better wages. A final, but equally common response
|
||
was a concern that there was not strong enough vision, unity and
|
||
cooperation to drive new economic development opportunities.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
Town Services
|
||
|
||
Residents were generally positive on the quality of services they
|
||
|
||
received from the Town. However, some attendees advocated for
|
||
|
||
the expansion of natural gas to residential users.
|
||
|
||
Community Vision
|
||
|
||
To solicit input on core concerns and desires for Richlands, those in
|
||
|
||
attendance were asked to finish the statement: “My vision for
|
||
|
||
Richlands is a community where _______.” Most attendees
|
||
|
||
stressed the importance of jobs and a healthy economy that would
|
||
|
||
allow residents to enjoy their lives. Economic vitality was the most
|
||
|
||
important issue, followed by taking better advantage of the natural
|
||
|
||
beauty of the area, strong governmental leadership and better
|
||
|
||
cooperation.
|
||
|
||
The Evening’s Common Thread
|
||
|
||
“Grow or die” was a common sentiment when considering the
|
||
|
||
future of Richlands. Many attendees noted that without new jobs
|
||
|
||
and investment, children raised in Richlands would leave to find
|
||
|
||
better opportunities elsewhere. Without suitable housing and good
|
||
|
||
support services, the elderly would leave as well to be closer to their
|
||
|
||
grown children. The four goals that emerged were: 1) proactive and
|
||
|
||
collaborative leadership; 2) improved housing options; 3) less blight;
|
||
|
||
and 4) a renewed emphasis on recreational and cultural activities
|
||
|
||
and events all for the purpose of serving one large goal: improve the
|
||
|
||
local economy.
|
||
|
||
1.3.3 Summary of Community Input
|
||
|
||
In-person and in writing, residents and neighbors of Richlands
|
||
|
||
communicated their concerns and vision for the future of the Town.
|
||
|
||
Battered by the regional economic downturn, survey and meeting
|
||
|
||
participants emphasized the importance of cultivating higher
|
||
|
||
quality jobs that flourish in the modern economy and spread wealth
|
||
|
||
throughout the community. Next on their agenda was a yearning
|
||
|
||
for better and more affordable housing options that cater to the
|
||
|
||
local demographic, both the community’s aging population and its
|
||
|
||
families. Residents would also like to see an overall clean-up effort
|
||
|
||
to remove blight that places an unwanted burden on the
|
||
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
Once the more pressing issues are resolved, survey and meeting
|
||
|
||
participants expressed that they would like to enjoy expanded
|
||
|
||
recreational and cultural activities, particularly for the youth and
|
||
|
||
elderly. It was felt that additional activities and events could work
|
||
|
||
in tandem with efforts to revitalize the economy. Richlands, to the
|
||
|
||
desire of its residents, friends and neighbors, could then better
|
||
|
||
market itself as a Town with a rich and vibrant history and a wealth
|
||
|
||
of culture and opportunity. However, in order to strive for this
|
||
|
||
vision and sustain it for the next generation in Richlands, unity and
|
||
|
||
cooperation among Town leadership is a must.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Town Services
|
||
|
||
Residents were generally positive on the quality of services they
|
||
received from the Town. However, some attendees advocated for
|
||
the expansion of natural gas to residential users.
|
||
|
||
Community Vision
|
||
To solicit input on core concerns and desires for Richlands, those in
|
||
attendance were asked to finish the statement: “My vision for
|
||
Richlands is a community where ” Most attendees
|
||
stressed the importance of jobs and a healthy economy that would
|
||
allow residents to enjoy their lives. Economic vitality was the most
|
||
important issue, followed by taking better advantage of the natural
|
||
beauty of the area, strong governmental leadership and better
|
||
cooperation.
|
||
|
||
The Evening’s Common Thread
|
||
“Grow or die” was a common sentiment when considering the
|
||
future of Richlands. Many attendees noted that without new jobs
|
||
and investment, children raised in Richlands would leave to find
|
||
better opportunities elsewhere. Without suitable housing and good
|
||
support services, the elderly would leave as well to be closer to their
|
||
grown children. The four goals that emerged were: 1) proactive and
|
||
collaborative leadership; 2) improved housing options; 3) less blight;
|
||
and 4) a renewed emphasis on recreational and cultural activities
|
||
and events all for the purpose of serving one large goal: improve the
|
||
local economy.
|
||
|
||
1.3.3 Summary of Community Input
|
||
In-person and in writing, residents and neighbors of Richlands
|
||
communicated their concerns and vision for the future of the Town.
|
||
Battered by the regional economic downturn, survey and meeting
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
participants emphasized the importance of cultivating higher
|
||
quality jobs that flourish in the modern economy and spread wealth
|
||
throughout the community. Next on their agenda was a yearning
|
||
for better and more affordable housing options that cater to the
|
||
|
||
local demographic, both the community's aging population and its
|
||
|
||
families. Residents would also like to see an overall clean-up effort
|
||
to remove blight that places an unwanted burden on the
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
Once the more pressing issues are resolved, survey and meeting
|
||
participants expressed that they would like to enjoy expanded
|
||
recreational and cultural activities, particularly for the youth and
|
||
elderly. It was felt that additional acti and events could work
|
||
in tandem with efforts to revitalize the economy. Richlands, to the
|
||
desire of residents, friends and neighbors, could then better
|
||
market itself as a Town with a rich and vibrant history and a wealth
|
||
of culture and opportunity. However, in order to strive for this
|
||
vision and sustain it for the next generation in Richlands, unity and
|
||
cooperation among Town leadership is a must.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
2 BACKGROUND
|
||
|
||
2.1 POPULATION AND AGE
|
||
Projections for Richlands and the region show flat growth and an
|
||
|
||
aging population.
|
||
|
||
Figure 1: Population Change
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
9
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
9
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
-2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
h
|
||
|
||
an
|
||
ge
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
9
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
-2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
%
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
h
|
||
|
||
an
|
||
ge
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
st
|
||
|
||
im
|
||
at
|
||
|
||
e
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
-2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
%
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
h
|
||
|
||
an
|
||
ge
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands 4,456 4,144 5,823 1,367 30.7% 5,583 -4.1%
|
||
|
||
Western/NW
|
||
Tazewell Co 15,895 14,484 18,125 2,230 14.0% No Data -
|
||
|
||
Tazewell Co 45,960 44,598 45,078 -882 -1.9% 44,654 -0.9%
|
||
|
||
Cumberland
|
||
Plateau PDC 123,580 118,279 113,976 -9,604 -7.8% 112,785 -1.0%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service
|
||
|
||
Figure 1 shows population change in Richlands and the surrounding
|
||
|
||
region. The 30.7% increase in Richlands’ population between 2000
|
||
|
||
and 2010 can be accounted for by the land brought into the Town
|
||
|
||
by Boundary Adjustment in 2005 – 1,495 residents according to the
|
||
|
||
Commission on Local Government. Without the adjustment, the
|
||
|
||
population would have decreased by 2.9% between 1990 and 2010.
|
||
|
||
Since 2010, the Town’s population has declined by 4.1%, as of 2014.
|
||
|
||
The population for the census-designated districts of Northwestern
|
||
|
||
and Western Tazewell County have been included in Figure 1 to
|
||
|
||
show the population changes in areas surrounding Richlands over
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
the same time periods. The two county districts that Richlands falls
|
||
|
||
within are shown in the map in Figure 2 below.
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission (PDC) region,
|
||
|
||
which includes Buchanan, Dickenson, Russell, and Tazewell
|
||
|
||
Counties, lost 7.8% of its population – 9,604 residents – between
|
||
|
||
2000 and 2010. In contrast, the Western/Northwestern Tazewell
|
||
|
||
County districts grew by 14% or by 2,230 residents.
|
||
|
||
Figure 2: Tazewell County - Western and Northwestern District
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The increase in population surrounding Richlands may be attributed
|
||
|
||
to the growth of the unincorporated “suburbs” west of Richlands
|
||
|
||
including the Raven community and the approaches to Richlands
|
||
|
||
along the U.S. Route 19/460 corridor including Claypool Hill and
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
2 BACKGROUND
|
||
|
||
2.1 POPULATION AND AGE
|
||
Projections for Richlands and the region show flat growth and an.
|
||
aging population
|
||
|
||
Figure 1: Population Change
|
||
|
||
zg
|
||
|
||
2010-2014
|
||
% Change
|
||
|
||
Richlands 4456 44a 5,823 1,367 30.7% 5,583 -4.1%
|
||
|
||
Western/NW
|
||
TezewellCo 15,895 14,484 18,125 2,230 14.0% _No Data -
|
||
|
||
TaxewellCo 45,960 44,598 45,078 __—-882_—-1.9% 44,654 -0.9%
|
||
|
||
Cumberland
|
||
Plateau POC 123,580 118,279 113,976 _-9,608_-7.8% 112,785 _-1.0%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service
|
||
|
||
Figure 1 shows population change in Richlands and the surrounding
|
||
region. The 30.7% increase in Richlands’ population between 2000
|
||
and 2010 can be accounted for by the land brought into the Town
|
||
by Boundary Adjustment in 2005 ~ 1,495 residents according to the
|
||
Commission on Local Government. Without the adjustment, the
|
||
population would have decreased by 2.9% between 1990 and 2010.
|
||
‘Since 2010, the Town's population has declined by 4.1%, as of 2014.
|
||
The population for the census-designated districts of Northwestern
|
||
and Western Tazewell County have been included in Figure 1 to
|
||
show the population changes in areas surrounding Richlands over
|
||
|
||
the same time periods. The two county districts that Richlands falls
|
||
|
||
within are shown in the map in Figure 2 below.
|
||
|
||
The Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission (PDC) region,
|
||
which includes Buchanan, Dickenson, Russell, and Tazewell
|
||
Counties, lost 7.8% of its population ~ 9,604 residents ~ between
|
||
2000 and 2010. In contrast, the Western/Northwestern Tazewell
|
||
County districts grew by 14% or by 2,230 residents.
|
||
|
||
Figure 2: Tazewell County - Western and Northwestern
|
||
|
||
The increase in population surrounding Richlands may be attributed
|
||
to the growth of the unincorporated “suburbs” west of Richlands
|
||
including the Raven community and the approaches to Richlands
|
||
along the U.S. Route 19/460 corridor including Claypool Hill and
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
Cedar Bluff. As can be seen in Figure 3 below, these areas have
|
||
|
||
continued to grow since 1990.
|
||
|
||
Figure 3: Population Change – Neighboring Areas
|
||
|
||
1990 2000 2010
|
||
|
||
1990-
|
||
|
||
2010
|
||
|
||
Percent
|
||
|
||
Change
|
||
|
||
Claypool Hill 1,468 1,719 1,776 + 308 21.0%
|
||
|
||
Cedar Bluff 525 1,085 1,137 + 612 116.6%
|
||
|
||
Raven 985 2,593 2,270 + 1,285 130.5%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
Future projections (Figure 4) for Richlands and the surrounding
|
||
|
||
region show population growth to remain essentially flat. However,
|
||
|
||
as demonstrated in Figure 5, there is growing shift in age cohorts.
|
||
|
||
Age projections for Tazewell County (the only level available) show
|
||
|
||
an increase in residents over the age of 60 and a decrease in children
|
||
|
||
and working age adults. Residents over the age of 60 made up 24%
|
||
|
||
of the total County population in 2010. By 2040, this number is
|
||
|
||
projected to be 34%. In 2010, median age was 41.3 for the Town
|
||
|
||
and 37.2 nationally.
|
||
|
||
Figure 4: Population Projections
|
||
|
||
|
||
2020 2030 2040
|
||
|
||
2020-
|
||
|
||
2040
|
||
|
||
Percent
|
||
|
||
Change
|
||
|
||
Richlands 5,832 5,841 5,850 + 18 0.3%
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County 45,300 45,436 45,535 + 235 0.5%
|
||
|
||
Cumberland Plateau PDC 113,334 113,370 113,558 + 224 0.2%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service
|
||
|
||
Figure 5: Projected Population in Tazewell County by Age
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
As Figure 6 on the next page shows, Tazewell County showed a 5.3%
|
||
|
||
decrease in total school enrollment between 2002 and 2010, from
|
||
|
||
7,002 students to 6,628. Richlands area schools also declined in
|
||
|
||
enrollment, with the exception of Richlands Elementary, which
|
||
|
||
gained 48 students over this time. Combined enrollment from
|
||
|
||
Richlands High School, Richlands Middle and Richlands Elementary
|
||
|
||
School decreased by 4.5%.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
500
|
||
|
||
1000
|
||
|
||
1500
|
||
|
||
2000
|
||
|
||
2500
|
||
|
||
3000
|
||
|
||
3500
|
||
|
||
4000
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
t
|
||
|
||
o
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
t
|
||
|
||
o
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
3
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
3
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
3
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
3
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
5
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
6
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
8
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
8
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
8
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
+
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
p
|
||
u
|
||
|
||
la
|
||
ti
|
||
|
||
o
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
Age Range
|
||
|
||
2010 Census 2040 Projection
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Cedar Bluff. As can be seen in Figure 3 below, these areas have
|
||
continued to grow since 1990.
|
||
|
||
Figure 3: Population Change - Neighboring Areas
|
||
1990- Percent
|
||
200020102010 _change
|
||
Claypool 1ashu719_1768 +308 1.08%
|
||
Cedar bit 52510851137 +612_1166%
|
||
faven sas 2593 2270 +1285 _1305%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
Future projections (Figure 4) for Richlands and the surrounding
|
||
region show population growth to remain essentially flat. However,
|
||
as demonstrated in Figure 5, there is growing shift in age cohorts.
|
||
‘Age projections for Tazewell County (the only level available) show
|
||
an increase in residents over the age of 60 and a decrease in children
|
||
and working age adults. Residents over the age of 60 made up 24%
|
||
of the total County population in 2010. By 2040, this number is
|
||
projected to be 34%, In 2010, median age was 41.3 for the Town
|
||
and 37.2 nationally.
|
||
|
||
Figure 4: Population Projections
|
||
|
||
Percent
|
||
|
||
0202030 2000 Change
|
||
tices saa sau sas ae 03%
|
||
Tozewel county 45300 4548645535 +235 05H |
|
||
CumberandPaeauP0C 15334 113370_13558 422402 |
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 5: Projected Population in Tazewell County by Age
|
||
|
||
4000
|
||
|
||
3500
|
||
|
||
3000
|
||
|
||
2010 Census m 2040 Projection
|
||
|
||
‘Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
‘As Figure 6 on the next page shows, Tazewell County showed a 5.3%
|
||
decrease in total school enrollment between 2002 and 2010, from
|
||
7,002 students to 6,628. Richlands area schools also declined in
|
||
enrollment, with the exception of Richlands Elementary, which
|
||
gained 48 students over this time. Combined enrollment from
|
||
Richlands High School, Richlands Middle and Richlands Elementary
|
||
School decreased by 4.5%.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
|
||
Figure 6: School Enrollment
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Education – Fall Membership Data
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Overall population trends show flat growth or decline for Richlands,
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County and the region. In contrast the surrounding nearby
|
||
|
||
communities have grown significantly in the past decades, resulting
|
||
|
||
in a population increase for the western portions of Tazewell
|
||
|
||
County.
|
||
|
||
Age projections for Tazewell County show that the number of
|
||
|
||
elderly residents will grow and the numbers of children and working
|
||
|
||
age adults will shrink. Correspondingly, school enrollment trends
|
||
|
||
are down for the County and Town.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
According to 2040 projections, the current population will
|
||
|
||
essentially be the same, but with a higher proportion of elderly
|
||
|
||
residents. Without an influx of working age adults contributing to
|
||
|
||
the tax base, the population will stagnate while social assistance
|
||
|
||
costs will increase due to a greater proportion of elderly residents.
|
||
|
||
A change in this scenario is unlikely without new jobs and a growing
|
||
|
||
economy to attract working age adults.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
200
|
||
|
||
400
|
||
|
||
600
|
||
|
||
800
|
||
|
||
1000
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
3
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
7
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
8
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
Fa
|
||
ll
|
||
|
||
Sc
|
||
h
|
||
|
||
o
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
l E
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
ro
|
||
llm
|
||
|
||
e
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
t
|
||
|
||
Year
|
||
|
||
Richlands H.S.
|
||
|
||
Richlands M.S.
|
||
|
||
Richlands E.S.
|
||
|
||
Cedar Bluff E.S.
|
||
|
||
Raven E.S.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 6: School Enrollment
|
||
|
||
1000
|
||
|
||
2 00 |} ———___
|
||
5 600 | Richlands H.s.
|
||
5 100 | —. Richlands Ms
|
||
2 ——Richlands E.S.
|
||
Ce —————— ae
|
||
° Re ES.
|
||
EESSE8 228
|
||
|
||
‘Source: Virginia Department of Education - Fall Membership Data
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
Overall population trends show flat growth or decline for Richlands,
|
||
Tazewell County and the region. In contrast the surrounding nearby
|
||
communities have grown significantly in the past decades, resulting
|
||
in a population increase for the western portions of Tazewell
|
||
County.
|
||
|
||
‘Age projections for Tazewell County show that the number of
|
||
elderly residents will grow and the numbers of children and working
|
||
age adults will shrink. Correspondingly, school enrollment trends
|
||
are down for the County and Town.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
According to 2040 projections, the current population will
|
||
essentially be the same, but with a higher proportion of elderly
|
||
residents. Without an influx of working age adults contributing to
|
||
the tax base, the population will stagnate while social assistance
|
||
|
||
costs will increase due to a greater proportion of elderly residents.
|
||
A change in this scenario is unlikely without new jobs and a growing
|
||
economy to attract working age adults.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
8
|
||
|
||
2.2 HOUSING
|
||
Housing in Richlands is primarily made up of single-family homes
|
||
|
||
and mobile homes. Compared to Tazewell County, the Town has a
|
||
|
||
higher percentage of mobile homes and multifamily units. Multi-
|
||
|
||
family units represent a small percentage of housing in both the
|
||
|
||
Town and County but mobile homes comprise almost a third of all
|
||
|
||
units in Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Figure 7: Housing Units
|
||
|
||
Richlands Percentage Tazewell Percentage
|
||
|
||
Total housing units 2,648 [x] 20,718 [x]
|
||
|
||
Single Family 1,453 55% 13,789 67%
|
||
|
||
Mobile home 848 32% 4,984 24%
|
||
|
||
Attached and Multifamily 347 13% 1,945 9%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2009-2013 Estimates
|
||
|
||
Compared to Virginia overall, Richlands has a much higher rate of
|
||
|
||
mobile homes than the statewide average of 5.4% and a much lower
|
||
|
||
rate of attached and multifamily units than the statewide average
|
||
|
||
of 32.5%. The high rate of mobile homes in Town is partly due to
|
||
|
||
the limited amount of buildable land and the historic need for
|
||
|
||
affordable workforce housing. Much of the manufactured housing
|
||
|
||
that was located in Richlands in the mid-20th century to meet
|
||
|
||
economic demand still remains and is in poor condition.
|
||
|
||
Figure 8: Households
|
||
|
||
2000 2010 Change
|
||
|
||
Total households 1,882 2,552 670
|
||
|
||
Family households (families) 65.0% 63.9% -1.1%
|
||
|
||
Female Householder with children under 18 5.5% 5.7% 0.2%
|
||
|
||
Nonfamily households 35.0% 36.1% 1.1%
|
||
|
||
Households with individuals under 18 years 25.8% 28.3% 2.5%
|
||
|
||
Households with individuals 65 years and over 32.1% 29.0% -3.1%
|
||
|
||
Average household size 2.20 2.28 3.6%
|
||
|
||
Average family size 2.76 2.84 2.9%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
As noted previously, the 2005 Boundary Adjustment makes finding
|
||
|
||
trends between census counts difficult. Figure 8 is a comparison of
|
||
|
||
percentages between different household types from 2000 and
|
||
|
||
2010. It demonstrates that the average household and family size
|
||
|
||
grew and the percentage of elderly households shrunk.
|
||
|
||
As outlined in Figure 9 on the next page, the Town added 723
|
||
|
||
housing units between 2000 and 2010, mostly due to the 2005
|
||
|
||
adjustment. The rate of occupied housing units was largely
|
||
|
||
unchanged over this time. The largest change was in reduced
|
||
|
||
vacancy rate for rental property.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
2.2 HOUSING
|
||
|
||
Housing in Richlands is primarily made up of single-family homes
|
||
and mobile homes. Compared to Tazewell County, the Town has a
|
||
higher percentage of mobile homes and multifamily units. Mul
|
||
family units represent a small percentage of housing in both the
|
||
Town and County but mobile homes comprise almost a third of all
|
||
units in Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Housing Units
|
||
Richlands Percentage __Tazewel
|
||
|
||
Total housing units 2,608 bl 20718 oT
|
||
|
||
Single Family 1483 55% 13,789 on
|
||
|
||
Mobile home 848 32% 4.984 24%
|
||
|
||
Attached and Multifamily 307 13% 4945 9%
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2009-2013 Estimates
|
||
|
||
Compared to Virginia overall, Richlands has a much higher rate of
|
||
mobile homes than the statewide average of 5.4% and a much lower
|
||
rate of attached and multifamily units than the statewide average
|
||
of 32.5%. The high rate of mobile homes in Town is partly due to
|
||
the limited amount of buildable land and the historic need for
|
||
affordable workforce housing. Much of the manufactured housing
|
||
that was located in Richlands in the mid-20" century to meet
|
||
economic demand still remains and is in poor condition.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 8: Households
|
||
|
||
2000 2010 _Change
|
||
|
||
Total households 4gs2 2,552 670
|
||
|
||
Family households (amie) 650% 639% -11%
|
||
Female Householder with children under 18 5.5% 5.7% 0.2%
|
||
|
||
Nonfamily households 380% 361% 14%
|
||
|
||
Households with individuals under 18 years 258% 283% 25%
|
||
|
||
Households with individuals 65 years and over 32.1% 29.0% 3.1%
|
||
|
||
‘Average household size 220 228 3.6%
|
||
|
||
Average family site 276 288 29%
|
||
|
||
‘Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
‘As noted previously, the 2005 Boundary Adjustment makes finding
|
||
trends between census counts difficult. Figure 8 is a comparison of
|
||
percentages between different household types from 2000 and
|
||
2010. It demonstrates that the average household and family size
|
||
grew and the percentage of elderly households shrunk.
|
||
|
||
‘As outlined in Figure 9 on the next page, the Town added 723
|
||
housing units between 2000 and 2010, mostly due to the 2005
|
||
adjustment. The rate of occupied housing units was largely
|
||
unchanged over this time. The largest change was in reduced
|
||
vacancy rate for rental property.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
Figure 9: Housing Occupancy
|
||
|
||
2000 2010 Change
|
||
|
||
Total housing units 2,137 2,860 723
|
||
|
||
Occupied housing units 88.1% 89.2% 1.1%
|
||
|
||
Vacant housing units 11.9% 10.8% -1.1%
|
||
|
||
Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 3.2% 2.4% -0.8%
|
||
|
||
Rental vacancy rate (percent) 15.5% 10.5% -5.0%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
As shown in Figure 10, the number of occupied households in
|
||
|
||
Richlands grew by 670 units. The number of renter-occupied units
|
||
|
||
grew at a faster rate, however, and now makes up a greater
|
||
|
||
percentage of the number of total units than before.
|
||
|
||
Figure 10: Housing Tenure
|
||
|
||
2000 2010 Change
|
||
|
||
Occupied housing units 1,882 2,552 670
|
||
|
||
Owner-occupied housing units 68.7% 63.7% -5.0%
|
||
|
||
Renter-occupied housing units 31.3% 36.3% 5.0%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
Figure 11 shows the value of owner-occupied housing in relation to
|
||
|
||
other communities in the County and to the County overall. Lower-
|
||
|
||
and upper-quartile values can show the range of home values within
|
||
|
||
a community that a median value cannot capture. The lower
|
||
|
||
quartile is the value point of a house that is valued higher than 25%
|
||
|
||
of other homes, and the upper quartile is the value point of a house
|
||
|
||
that is valued higher than 75% of other homes.
|
||
|
||
Figure 11: Value of Owner-Occupied Housing
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2009-2013 Estimates
|
||
|
||
Richlands has a relatively high median home value, second only to
|
||
|
||
the Town of Tazewell. The Town’s lower value quartile of $41,500
|
||
|
||
shows that one out of four owner-occupied units are valued at or
|
||
|
||
below $41,500. The lower quartile home value in Richlands is lower
|
||
|
||
than those in Cedar Bluff, Tazewell Town and Bluefield, Va. This
|
||
|
||
lower value can be an indicator of poor housing conditions and may
|
||
|
||
correspond with Richland’s rate of mobile homes and manufactured
|
||
|
||
housing.
|
||
|
||
With the exception of Bluefield, Va., Richlands has the highest
|
||
|
||
spread between lower- and upper-value quartile housing among the
|
||
|
||
localities shown. This means that there may be fewer homes
|
||
|
||
$-
|
||
|
||
$50,000
|
||
|
||
$100,000
|
||
|
||
$150,000
|
||
|
||
$200,000
|
||
|
||
$250,000
|
||
|
||
Richlands Cedar Bluff Tazewell
|
||
(Town)
|
||
|
||
Bluefield
|
||
(VA)
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Lower value quartile Median value Upper value quartile
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 9: Housing Occupancy
|
||
|
||
2000 2010 change
|
||
|
||
‘otal housing units 24372860723
|
||
‘Occupied housing units sa1% 892% 14%
|
||
Vacant housing units 119% 108% 11%
|
||
|
||
Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 32% 24% 08%
|
||
|
||
Rental vacancy rte (percent) 155% 105% 50%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
‘As shown in Figure 10, the number of occupied households in
|
||
Richlands grew by 670 units. The number of renter-occupied units
|
||
grew at a faster rate, however, and now makes up a greater
|
||
percentage of the number of total units than before.
|
||
|
||
Figure 10: Housing Tenure
|
||
|
||
2000 2010 _change
|
||
|
||
Occupied housing units 1982 2,552 670,
|
||
(Owner-occupied housing units 687% 637% 5.0%
|
||
Renter-occupied housing units 313% 363% 5.0%
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
Figure 11 shows the value of owner-occupied housing in relation to
|
||
other communities in the County and to the County overall. Lower-
|
||
and upper-quartile values can show the range of home values within
|
||
a community that a median value cannot capture. The lower
|
||
quartile is the value point of a house that is valued higher than 25%
|
||
|
||
of other homes, and the upper quartile is the value point of a house
|
||
that is valued higher than 75% of other homes.
|
||
|
||
Figure 11: Value of Owner-Occupied Housing
|
||
|
||
$250,000
|
||
|
||
$200,000
|
||
|
||
$150,000
|
||
|
||
$100,000
|
||
$50,000 +
|
||
$
|
||
|
||
Richlands Cedar Bluff Tazewell Bluefield Tazewell
|
||
(Town) (VA) County
|
||
|
||
Lower value quartile m Median value = Upper value quartile
|
||
|
||
‘Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2009-2013 Estimates
|
||
|
||
Richlands has a relatively high median home value, second only to
|
||
the Town of Tazewell. The Town’s lower value quartile of $41,500
|
||
shows that one out of four owner-occupied units are valued at or
|
||
below $41,500. The lower quartile home value in Richlands is lower
|
||
than those in Cedar Bluff, Tazewell Town and Bluefield, Va. This
|
||
lower value can be an indicator of poor housing conditions and may
|
||
correspond with Richland’s rate of mobile homes and manufactured
|
||
housing.
|
||
|
||
With the exception of Bluefield, Va., Richlands has the highest
|
||
spread between lower- and upper-value quartile housing among the
|
||
localities shown. This means that there may be fewer homes
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
available at a median price range and a higher proportion that are
|
||
|
||
valued either relatively low or relatively high.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
The housing stock in Richlands is primarily a mix of single-family and
|
||
|
||
mobile and manufactured housing at a wide range of values.
|
||
|
||
Though the majority of housing is owner-occupied, rates of rental
|
||
|
||
housing are growing.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
As the population of the Town and the region ages, there will be a
|
||
|
||
greater demand for age-appropriate housing than is currently
|
||
|
||
provided. Also, the Town has a shortage in multifamily housing and
|
||
|
||
an abundance of mobile and manufactured homes compared to
|
||
|
||
statewide averages. These two trends suggest that over the next
|
||
|
||
few decades the Town’s growing elderly population may encounter
|
||
|
||
difficulties in maintaining their existing single family homes and
|
||
|
||
hence their independence. It can be expected that the need for age-
|
||
|
||
appropriate housing, including apartments, townhouses, assisted
|
||
|
||
living facilities, and retirement communities will continue to grow.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
available at a median price range and a higher proportion that are
|
||
valued either relatively low or relatively high.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
‘The housing stock in Richlands is primarily a mix of single-far
|
||
|
||
ly and
|
||
mobile and manufactured housing at a wide range of values.
|
||
Though the majority of housing is owner-occupied, rates of rental
|
||
housing are growing.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
As the population of the Town and the region ages, there will be a
|
||
greater demand for age-appropriate housing than is currently
|
||
provided. Also, the Town has a shortage in multifamily housing and
|
||
an abundance of mobile and manufactured homes compared to
|
||
statewide averages. These two trends suggest that over the next
|
||
few decades the Town's growing elderly population may encounter
|
||
difficulties in maintaining their existing single family homes and
|
||
hence their independence. It can be expected that the need for age-
|
||
appropriate housing, including apartments, townhouses, assisted
|
||
living facilities, and retirement communities will continue to grow.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
11
|
||
|
||
2.3 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
|
||
|
||
2.3.1 History
|
||
Richlands can credit its name to the fertile soil of the Clinch River
|
||
|
||
Valley. However, it was the rich and abundant coal reserves in
|
||
|
||
Southwest Virginia and the extension of the railroad into the region
|
||
|
||
in the late 19th century that shaped the character of the Town into
|
||
|
||
the 20th century and beyond. The Town’s success has been closely
|
||
|
||
reflected in the booms and busts of the coal industry since being
|
||
|
||
platted in 1888.
|
||
|
||
The Town is a stop along the Virginia Coal Heritage Trail, which
|
||
|
||
connects several towns through seven counties in Southwest
|
||
|
||
Virginia’s historic coal mining region. Visitors and local residents can
|
||
|
||
visit the Coal Miners’ Memorial and the soon to be renovated
|
||
|
||
Railroad Section House.
|
||
|
||
The Railroad Section House was the home of the railroad section
|
||
|
||
foreman, tasked with maintaining the section of railroad in and
|
||
|
||
around the Town. The historic building was erected in the 1890’s
|
||
|
||
by the Norfolk and Western Railroad and still has its original board
|
||
|
||
and batten siding, windows and tin roof to this day. Once
|
||
|
||
renovated, the Railroad Section House will document and interpret
|
||
|
||
the Town’s railroad and coal heritage.
|
||
|
||
The Coal Miners’ Memorial of the Commonwealth is located in a
|
||
|
||
prominent location in front of Town Hall. This attractive memorial
|
||
|
||
is the official state memorial and is a tribute to coal miners
|
||
|
||
throughout the region, especially those who lost their lives in
|
||
|
||
mining-related accidents.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Surrounding the Coal Miners’ Memorial is the Richlands Historic
|
||
|
||
District. This district is part of the original Town street grid as laid
|
||
|
||
out by the Clinch Valley Iron and Coal Company in 1888. This district
|
||
|
||
includes Richlands’ historic downtown area and earliest residential
|
||
Railroad Section House
|
||
|
||
Source: Rod Cury
|
||
|
||
Coal Miners’ Memorial
|
||
Source: Visittazewellcounty.org
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
2.3 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
|
||
|
||
2.3.1 History
|
||
Richlands can credit its name to the fertile soil of the Clinch River
|
||
Valley. However, it was the rich and abundant coal reserves in
|
||
Southwest Virginia and the extension of the railroad into the region.
|
||
in the late 19" century that shaped the character of the Town into
|
||
the 20" century and beyond. The Town’s success has been closely
|
||
reflected in the booms and busts of the coal industry since being
|
||
platted in 1888.
|
||
|
||
The Town is a stop along the Virginia Coal Heritage Trail, which
|
||
connects several towns through seven counties in Southwest
|
||
Virginia’s historic coal mining region. Visitors and local residents can
|
||
visit the Coal Miners’ Memorial and the soon to be renovated
|
||
Railroad Section House.
|
||
|
||
Ce ae
|
||
|
||
Railroad Section House
|
||
Source: Rod Cury
|
||
|
||
The Railroad Section House was the home of the railroad section
|
||
foreman, tasked with maintaining the section of railroad in and
|
||
around the Town. The historic building was erected in the 1890's
|
||
by the Norfolk and Western Railroad and still has its original board
|
||
and batten siding, windows and tin roof to this day. Once
|
||
renovated, the Railroad Section House will document and interpret
|
||
the Town's railroad and coal heritage.
|
||
|
||
The Coal Miners’ Memorial of the Commonwealth is located in a
|
||
prominent location in front of Town Hall. This attractive memorial
|
||
is the official state memorial and is a tribute to coal miners
|
||
throughout the region, especially those who lost their lives in
|
||
mining-related accidents.
|
||
|
||
a
|
||
>
|
||
|
||
Coal Miners’ Memorial
|
||
‘Source: Visittazewellcounty.org
|
||
|
||
Surrounding the Coal Miners’ Memorial is the Richlands Historic
|
||
District. This district is part of the original Town street grid as laid
|
||
out by the Clinch Valley Iron and Coal Company in 1888. This district,
|
||
includes Richlands’ historic downtown area and earliest residential
|
||
|
||
cry
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
12
|
||
|
||
neighborhood, both of which show the architectural styles
|
||
|
||
prominent in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The creation of murals
|
||
|
||
and the Fire and Rescue
|
||
|
||
Department sculpture in
|
||
|
||
the downtown (seen at
|
||
|
||
right) highlight the
|
||
|
||
Town’s history and
|
||
|
||
creativity. Additionally,
|
||
|
||
the Richlands Farmer’s
|
||
|
||
Market is located down-
|
||
|
||
town. Venues like these
|
||
|
||
help generate needed
|
||
|
||
downtown foot traffic
|
||
|
||
and serve to draw
|
||
|
||
people to the Town from
|
||
|
||
across the region.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Downtown Murals and Fire & Rescue Sculpture
|
||
Source: Photographs by Community Planning Partners
|
||
|
||
Richlands Historic District
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Historic Resources
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
neighborhood, both of which show the architectural styles
|
||
prominent in the late 19" and early 20" centuries.
|
||
|
||
Richlands Historic District
|
||
‘Source: Virginia Department of Historic Resources
|
||
|
||
The creation of murals
|
||
and the Fire and Rescue
|
||
Department sculpture in
|
||
the downtown (seen at
|
||
right) highlight the
|
||
Town's history and
|
||
creativity. Additionally,
|
||
the Richlands Farmer's
|
||
Market is located down-
|
||
town. Venues like these
|
||
help generate needed
|
||
downtown foot traffic
|
||
and serve to draw
|
||
people to the Town from
|
||
across the region.
|
||
|
||
Downtown Murals and Fire & Rescue Sculpture
|
||
Source: Photographs by Community Planning Partners
|
||
|
||
12
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
The Tazewell Avenue Historic District was developed after the
|
||
|
||
Richlands Historic District, but has similar architecture. The
|
||
|
||
neighborhood includes a commercial district that fronts the railroad
|
||
|
||
with a residential district laid out in a grid pattern behind it.
|
||
|
||
Architectural styles include Late Victorian and Queen Ann homes,
|
||
|
||
but also more modest Colonial Revival, American Craftsmen and
|
||
|
||
Bungalow styles. Historic commercial buildings in this district are
|
||
|
||
two-story brick structures that provide storefront commercial and
|
||
|
||
retail space along the sidewalk.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Williams House is the only building in Richlands singularly listed
|
||
|
||
on the State and National Historic Registers. It was built in 1890 and
|
||
|
||
is one of the earliest buildings constructed in the Town. It was built
|
||
|
||
to serve as the main office for the Clinch Valley Iron and Coal
|
||
|
||
Company that intended to transform Richlands into a prominent
|
||
|
||
coke and iron manufacturing center.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.3.2 Arts, Culture & Events
|
||
|
||
Richlands honors its culture and heritage by coordinating a number
|
||
|
||
of community-wide annual events and serving as a local hub for the
|
||
|
||
arts in Tazewell County.
|
||
|
||
CART (Citizens for the Arts),
|
||
|
||
CART, operating for 36 continuous years, is located near Richlands’
|
||
|
||
public library. Funded by state and national arts endowments and
|
||
|
||
the area’s local governments, CART supports the performing arts. A
|
||
|
||
core value of CART is to provide Arts-in-Education programs that
|
||
|
||
enlighten the public and nurtures students. Over the course of the
|
||
|
||
year CART schedules, organizes and stages numerous theatrical,
|
||
|
||
Tazewell Avenue Historic District
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Historic Resources
|
||
|
||
The Williams House
|
||
Source: Town of Richlands
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
The Tazewell Avenue Historic District was developed after the
|
||
Richlands Historic District, but has similar architecture. The
|
||
neighborhood includes a commercial district that fronts the railroad
|
||
with a residential district laid out in a grid pattern behind it.
|
||
Architectural styles include Late Victorian and Queen Ann homes,
|
||
but also more modest Colonial Revival, American Craftsmen and
|
||
Bungalow styles. Historic commercial buildings in this district are
|
||
two-story brick structures that provide storefront commercial and
|
||
retail space along the sidewalk.
|
||
|
||
Tazewell Avenue Historic District
|
||
‘Source: Virginia Department of Historic Resources
|
||
|
||
The Williams House is the only building in Richlands singularly listed
|
||
on the State and National Historic Registers. It was built in 1890 and
|
||
is one of the earliest buildings constructed in the Town. It was built
|
||
to serve as the main office for the Clinch Valley Iron and Coal
|
||
Company that intended to transform Richlands into a prominent
|
||
coke and iron manufacturing center.
|
||
|
||
The Williams House
|
||
Source: Town of Richlands
|
||
|
||
2.3.2 Arts, Culture & Events
|
||
Richlands honors its culture and heritage by coordinating a number
|
||
of community-wide annual events and serving as a local hub for the
|
||
arts in Tazewell County.
|
||
|
||
CART, operating for 36 continuous years, is located near Richlands’
|
||
public library. Funded by state and national arts endowments and
|
||
the area's local governments, CART supports the performing arts. A
|
||
core value of CART is to provide Arts-in-Education programs that
|
||
enlighten the public and nurtures students. Over the course of the
|
||
year CART schedules, organizes and stages numerous theatrical,
|
||
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
14
|
||
|
||
dance and musical performances at various venues throughout
|
||
|
||
Richlands and Tazewell County for the public to enjoy.
|
||
|
||
Richlands Farmers’ Market
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Farmers’ Market is owned and operated by the Town
|
||
|
||
of Richlands and operates six days per week from April 1 to
|
||
|
||
December 31. The Town funds the Market so that area small
|
||
|
||
businesses and organization can find a staging area for their
|
||
|
||
economic endeavors and is open to area farmers, gardeners, crafts
|
||
|
||
persons, and food vendors.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands Annual Freedom Festival
|
||
|
||
The Freedom Festival has become a regular annual event in mid-
|
||
|
||
summer supported by a host of local and regional sponsors. Across
|
||
|
||
the two-day event, a variety of attractions and vendors are amassed
|
||
|
||
to illustrate the culture, history, and artisanship of the Clinch Valley
|
||
|
||
region. Festival participants enjoy historical tours and reenact-
|
||
|
||
ments, musical performances, a motorcycle show, unique art,
|
||
|
||
patriotic contests, carnival rides, a 5K race, and large fireworks
|
||
|
||
display.
|
||
|
||
Annual Winter Honey Festival
|
||
|
||
This festival is an annual gathering of Richlands area beekeepers,
|
||
|
||
craftsmen, and honey artisans to showcase their bee-related craft.
|
||
|
||
Over 40 vendors participate in the festival representing a variety of
|
||
|
||
honey types and other handcrafted items.
|
||
|
||
Richlands Annual Town Wide Yard Sale
|
||
|
||
The annual Town Wide Yard Sale is sponsored and hosted by the
|
||
|
||
Freedom Festival Committee. Serving as a treasure-seeking
|
||
|
||
occasion not only for Richlands, but Tazewell County as well, the
|
||
|
||
event is held in late spring each year.
|
||
|
||
Local Parades
|
||
|
||
Richlands also sponsors or hosts a number of parades each year that
|
||
|
||
have wide draw including the Richlands High School Homecoming
|
||
|
||
Parade, a Veteran’s Parade, and the annual Christmas Parade.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Richlands’ rail and coal history provide a strong sense of place and
|
||
|
||
heritage and the historic districts help communicate its history.
|
||
|
||
Citizens are rightfully proud of this history and these symbols of the
|
||
|
||
past.
|
||
|
||
Richlands also has a growing array of arts, culture and big events
|
||
|
||
that not only entertain and inspire local citizens, but serve as a draw
|
||
|
||
to the community.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Farmers’ Market
|
||
Source: Town of Richlands
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
dance and musical performances at various venues throughout
|
||
Richlands and Tazewell County for the public to enjoy.
|
||
|
||
Richlands Farmers’ Market
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Farmers’ Market is owned and operated by the Town
|
||
of Richlands and operates six days per week from April 1 to
|
||
December 31. The Town funds the Market so that area small
|
||
businesses and organization can find a staging area for their
|
||
economic endeavors and is open to area farmers, gardeners, crafts
|
||
persons, and food vendors.
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Farmers’ Market
|
||
Source: Town of Richlands
|
||
|
||
Richlands Annual Freedom Festival
|
||
|
||
The Freedom Festival has become a regular annual event in
|
||
summer supported by a host of local and regional sponsors. Across
|
||
the two-day event, a variety of attractions and vendors are amassed
|
||
to illustrate the culture, history, and artisanship of the Clinch Valley
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
region. Festival participants enjoy historical tours and reenact-
|
||
ments, musical performances, a motorcycle show, unique art,
|
||
patriotic contests, carnival rides, a SK race, and large fireworks
|
||
display.
|
||
|
||
Annual Winter Honey Festival
|
||
This festival is an annual gathering of Richlands area beekeepers,
|
||
craftsmen, and honey artisans to showcase their bee-related craft.
|
||
Over 40 vendors participate in the festival representing a variety of
|
||
honey types and other handcrafted items.
|
||
|
||
Richlands Annual Town Wide Yard Sale
|
||
|
||
The annual Town Wide Yard Sale is sponsored and hosted by the
|
||
Freedom Festival Committee. Serving as a treasure-seeking
|
||
occasion not only for Richlands, but Tazewell County as well, the
|
||
event is held in late spring each year.
|
||
|
||
Local Parades
|
||
|
||
Richlands also sponsors or hosts a number of parades each year that
|
||
have wide draw including the Richlands High School Homecoming
|
||
Parade, a Veteran's Parade, and the annual Christmas Parade.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
Richlands’ rail and coal history provide a strong sense of place and
|
||
heritage and the historic districts help communicate its history.
|
||
Citizens are rightfully proud of this history and these symbols of the
|
||
past.
|
||
|
||
Richlands also has a growing array of arts, culture and big events
|
||
that not only entertain and inspire local citizens, but serve as a draw
|
||
to the community.
|
||
|
||
14
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
15
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
Richlands’ rail and coal history, as well as its historic districts should
|
||
|
||
be protected and showcased as a means of maintaining community
|
||
|
||
pride and attracting visitors. The Town’s arts, culture and event
|
||
|
||
offerings should be expanded and utilized as a means of marketing
|
||
|
||
the Town and supporting Richlands economic development efforts.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
Richlands’ rail and coal history, as well as its historic districts should
|
||
be protected and showcased as a means of maintaining community
|
||
pride and attracting visitors. The Town's arts, culture and event
|
||
offerings should be expanded and utilized as a means of marketing
|
||
the Town and supporting Richlands economic development efforts.
|
||
|
||
15
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
16
|
||
|
||
2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
|
||
|
||
2.4.1 Forest Resources
|
||
|
||
One of the Town’s most important resources is its character as a
|
||
|
||
rural community located in a natural setting. The Town is
|
||
|
||
surrounded by hills and ridgelines, most of which are forested.
|
||
|
||
These forested slopes protect against erosion and create attractive
|
||
|
||
vistas for citizens and visitors alike.
|
||
|
||
At the same time, this defining feature also limits development in
|
||
|
||
Richlands. Because development on steep slopes can lead to soil
|
||
|
||
erosion that impacts streams and rivers and potentially undermines
|
||
|
||
building safety, modern building codes limit construction on steep
|
||
|
||
slopes. Construction on slopes above 25% grade is not advised and
|
||
|
||
above 33% is not allowed by the International Building Code (IBC), a
|
||
|
||
provision that is incorporated into the Virginia Uniform Statewide
|
||
|
||
Building Code (USBC). Additionally, the IBC (and hence the (USBC)
|
||
|
||
recommends a setback of 40 feet from the top of a steep slope and
|
||
|
||
15 feet from the bottom of a steep slope. As delineated in Figure
|
||
|
||
12 on page 16 and depicted in the Environmental Constraints Map
|
||
|
||
and Land Suitable for Development Map that follow page 21, these
|
||
|
||
restrictions limit the amount of undeveloped land in Richlands that
|
||
|
||
is suitable for development.
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Hydrology and Water Resources
|
||
The Clinch River, traversing through the center of Richlands, is a
|
||
|
||
crown jewel natural resource in Southwest Virginia. Originating in
|
||
|
||
the mountains northeast of Town, the river travels some 135 miles
|
||
|
||
through Tazewell, Russell, Wise, and Scott counties before reaching
|
||
|
||
Tennessee. With its smooth valleys carved out of the mountains
|
||
|
||
and foothills, the Clinch has played a considerable role in the
|
||
|
||
exploration and settlement of Southwest Virginia.
|
||
|
||
The Clinch is truly a treasure trove of aquatic life. According to the
|
||
|
||
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, the river
|
||
|
||
supports about 50 species of mussels, more than any other river in
|
||
|
||
the world. Over 100 species of non-game fish also claim the Clinch
|
||
|
||
as their home. Lying toward the bottom of the food chain, they play
|
||
|
||
an important role in the survival of other fish and mussel species.
|
||
|
||
The variety of sport fish that flock to the Clinch make it an ideal
|
||
|
||
destination for anglers.
|
||
|
||
Looking North from Richlands Town Hall
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
|
||
|
||
2.4.1 Forest Resources
|
||
|
||
One of the Town’s most important resources is its character as a
|
||
rural community located in a natural setting. The Town is
|
||
surrounded by hills and ridgelines, most of which are forested.
|
||
These forested slopes protect against erosion and create attractive
|
||
vistas for citizens and visitors alike.
|
||
|
||
At the same time, this defining feature also limits development in
|
||
Richlands. Because development on steep slopes can lead to soil
|
||
erosion that impacts streams and rivers and potentially undermines
|
||
building safety, modern building codes limit construction on steep
|
||
slopes. Construction on slopes above 25% grade is not advised and
|
||
above 33% is not allowed by the International Building Code (IBC), a
|
||
provision that is incorporated into the Virginia Uniform Statewide
|
||
Building Code (USBC). Additionally, the IBC (and hence the (USBC)
|
||
recommends a setback of 40 feet from the top of a steep slope and
|
||
15 feet from the bottom of a steep slope. As delineated in Figure
|
||
12 on page 16 and depicted in the Environmental Constraints Map
|
||
and Land Suitable for Development Map that follow page 21, these
|
||
restrictions limit the amount of undeveloped land in Richlands that
|
||
is suitable for development.
|
||
|
||
2.4.2 Hydrology and Water Resources
|
||
|
||
The Clinch River, traversing through the center of Richlands, is a
|
||
crown jewel natural resource in Southwest Virginia. Originating in
|
||
the mountains northeast of Town, the river travels some 135 miles
|
||
through Tazewell, Russell, Wise, and Scott counties before reaching
|
||
Tennessee. With its smooth valleys carved out of the mountains
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Looking North from Richlands Town Hall
|
||
|
||
and foothills, the Clinch has played a considerable role in the
|
||
exploration and settlement of Southwest Virginia,
|
||
|
||
The Clinch is truly a treasure trove of aquatic life. According to the
|
||
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, the river
|
||
supports about 50 species of mussels, more than any other river in
|
||
the world. Over 100 species of non-game fish also claim the Clinch
|
||
as their home. Lying toward the bottom of the food chain, they play
|
||
an important role in the survival of other fish and mussel species.
|
||
The variety of sport fish that flock to the Clinch make it an ideal
|
||
destination for anglers.
|
||
|
||
16
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
17
|
||
|
||
While a natural marvel for Richlands, the Clinch and the low-lying
|
||
|
||
lands adjacent to it can on occasion flood from heavy rain events
|
||
|
||
that fill the Clinch’s mountain feeder streams and rush into the main
|
||
|
||
stem. The Clinch’s extent and the 100-year flood plain surrounding
|
||
|
||
it are shown in the Environmental Constraints Map that follows
|
||
|
||
page 21.
|
||
|
||
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors water quality
|
||
|
||
for the Clinch River as well as the creeks that feed it. The following
|
||
|
||
bodies of water have been listed as impaired in one form or another:
|
||
|
||
Figure 12: Impaired Bodies of Water
|
||
|
||
Name Length
|
||
(miles)
|
||
|
||
Impacted Function Probable Cause
|
||
|
||
Clinch River (from the eastern
|
||
|
||
terminus of River Street to
|
||
|
||
Raven)
|
||
|
||
3.37 Fish Consumption
|
||
|
||
(Mercury in tissue),
|
||
|
||
Recreation
|
||
|
||
Unknown (Mercury),
|
||
|
||
Rural Residential,
|
||
|
||
and Stormwater
|
||
|
||
Runoff
|
||
|
||
Clinch River (from the eastern
|
||
|
||
terminus of River Street to
|
||
|
||
Cedar Bluff)
|
||
|
||
11.77 Recreation (E Coli
|
||
|
||
present)
|
||
|
||
Unknown
|
||
|
||
Town Hill Creek 0.25 Aquatic Life,
|
||
|
||
Recreation
|
||
|
||
Rural Residential ,
|
||
|
||
Silviculture
|
||
|
||
Big Creek 1.33 Aquatic Life,
|
||
|
||
Recreation
|
||
|
||
Coal Mining,
|
||
|
||
Silviculture, Rural
|
||
|
||
Residential
|
||
|
||
Mudlick Creek 2.43 Aquatic Life,
|
||
|
||
Recreation
|
||
|
||
Rural Residential,
|
||
|
||
Unknown
|
||
|
||
Source: EPA Water Quality Assessment
|
||
|
||
The most commonly listed “probable cause” of impairment are rural
|
||
|
||
land uses. The impact of septic systems and livestock can both
|
||
|
||
increase levels of E Coli. The presence of E Coli doesn’t necessarily
|
||
|
||
mean that there are disease-causing bacteria present in the water,
|
||
|
||
but it is a good indicator that other more harmful bacteria might be
|
||
|
||
present and swimming or eating shellfish might be a health risk per
|
||
|
||
EPA guidance. Important steps can be taken locally to reduce levels
|
||
|
||
of E Coli: the extension of public sanitary sewer to all households in
|
||
|
||
the Town, the restoration of vegetated buffers along the creeks and
|
||
|
||
the Clinch River, fencing around creeks and the river where livestock
|
||
|
||
are located, and ensuring that local residents pick up pet waste.
|
||
|
||
The presence of mercury in fish tissue has been identified in the
|
||
|
||
Clinch River, however the Virginia Department of Health has not
|
||
|
||
issued a fish consumption advisory for the river or any local
|
||
|
||
tributary. It should be noted that some of the impacts to the local
|
||
|
||
watershed result from uses beyond the Town boundaries – mining
|
||
|
||
and silviculture.
|
||
|
||
Even with these challenges, the Clinch River is being recognized
|
||
|
||
more and more as a regional asset that not only needs protection,
|
||
|
||
but can also provide opportunity. As part of a regional initiative to
|
||
|
||
expand access to the Clinch River, the Town has been designed as
|
||
|
||
one of the “Hometowns of the Clinch.” The Clinch River Valley
|
||
|
||
Initiative (CRVI) is a collaboration among local, regional and state
|
||
|
||
organizations to improve the environmental quality of the river,
|
||
|
||
provide opportunities for increased recreational access and connect
|
||
|
||
the River to economic development strategies for communities in
|
||
|
||
the Clinch River Valley. CRVI has five goals:
|
||
|
||
1. Develop a Clinch River State Park.
|
||
|
||
2. Develop and integrate access points, trails, and camp-
|
||
|
||
grounds along the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
While a natural marvel for Richlands, the Clinch and the low-lying
|
||
lands adjacent to it can on occasion flood from heavy rain events
|
||
that fill the Clinch’s mountain feeder streams and rush into the main
|
||
stem. The Clinch’s extent and the 100-year flood plain surrounding
|
||
it are shown in the Environmental Constraints Map that follows
|
||
page 21.
|
||
|
||
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors water quality
|
||
for the Clinch River as well as the creeks that feed it. The following
|
||
bodies of water have been listed as impaired in one form or another:
|
||
|
||
‘Length Impacted Function Probable Cause
|
||
(ites)
|
||
Clinch River (rom the eastern 3.37 ‘Fish Consumption Unknown (Mercury),
|
||
‘terminus of River Street to (Mercuryin issue), Rural Residential,
|
||
Raven) Recreation and Stormwater
|
||
Runoff
|
||
Clinch River from the eastern 11.7 Recreation (E Cali Unknown
|
||
terminus of River Street to present)
|
||
Cedar Blut)
|
||
‘Town Hill Creek 025 Aquatic Life, ural Residential,
|
||
Recreation Silviculture
|
||
Big Creek 1.33 Aquatic Life, Coal Mining,
|
||
Recreation Silviculture, Rural
|
||
Residential
|
||
‘Mudlick Creek 2.43 Aquatic tife, Rural Residential,
|
||
|
||
Recreation Unknown,
|
||
|
||
Source: EPA Water Quality Assessment
|
||
|
||
The most commonly listed “probable cause” of impairment are rural
|
||
land uses. The impact of septic systems and livestock can both
|
||
|
||
increase levels of E Coli. The presence of E Coli doesn’t necessarily
|
||
mean that there are disease-causing bacteria present in the water,
|
||
but itis a good indicator that other more harmful bacteria might be
|
||
present and swimming or eating shellfish might be a health risk per
|
||
EPA guidance. Important steps can be taken locally to reduce levels
|
||
of E Coli: the extension of public sanitary sewer to all households in
|
||
the Town, the restoration of vegetated buffers along the creeks and
|
||
the Clinch River, fencing around creeks and the river where livestock
|
||
are located, and ensuring that local residents pick up pet waste.
|
||
|
||
The presence of mercury in fish tissue has been identified in the
|
||
Clinch River, however the Virginia Department of Health has not
|
||
issued a fish consumption advisory for the river or any local
|
||
tributary. It should be noted that some of the impacts to the local
|
||
watershed result from uses beyond the Town boundaries ~ mining
|
||
and silviculture.
|
||
|
||
Even with these challenges, the Clinch River is being recognized
|
||
more and more as a regional asset that not only needs protection,
|
||
but can also provide opportunity. As part of a regional initiative to
|
||
expand access to the Clinch River, the Town has been designed as
|
||
one of the “Hometowns of the Clinch.” The Clinch River Valley
|
||
Initiative (CRVI) is a collaboration among local, regional and state
|
||
organizations to improve the environmental quality of the river,
|
||
provide opportunities for increased recreational access and connect
|
||
the River to economic development strategies for communities in
|
||
the Clinch River Valley. CRVI has five goals:
|
||
|
||
1, Develop a Clinch River State Park.
|
||
|
||
2. Develop and integrate access points, trails, and camp-
|
||
grounds along the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
7
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
18
|
||
|
||
3. Enhance water quality in the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
4. Develop and enhance environmental education oppor-
|
||
|
||
tunities for all community members in the Clinch River
|
||
|
||
watershed.
|
||
|
||
5. Connect and expand downtown revitalization, marketing
|
||
|
||
and entrepreneurial development opportunities in the
|
||
|
||
Clinch River Valley.
|
||
|
||
Currently the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has partnered with the
|
||
|
||
Richlands Christian Academy on the Mile 3118 Riverbank and
|
||
|
||
Riparian Corridor Restoration Project to regrade and stabilize a
|
||
|
||
portion of the River in Richlands to its original channel. These local
|
||
|
||
and regional efforts are already beginning to pay dividends including
|
||
|
||
CRVI being awarded the Scenic Virginia’s Scenic Tourism Award in
|
||
|
||
2015.
|
||
|
||
2.4.3 Mineral & Energy Resources
|
||
Some of the earliest coal mined in America was mined in Central
|
||
|
||
Virginia just south of Richmond and for many years, small coal mines
|
||
|
||
existed in both eastern Virginia and portions of the Blue Ridge and
|
||
|
||
Alleghany Mountains. As the extent of the Southwest Virginia
|
||
|
||
Coalfield was more fully explored and with the help of the railroad,
|
||
|
||
coal mining in the lucrative Southwest Virginia Coalfield far
|
||
|
||
surpassed the production of these early finds and they were all
|
||
|
||
abandoned by the early 1950’s. In Southwest Virginia there are over
|
||
|
||
70 individual coal beds within the rock layer beginning in western
|
||
|
||
Tazewell, Russell and Scott Counties and extending further into
|
||
|
||
Southwest Virginia and into West Virginia and Kentucky. The
|
||
|
||
bituminous coal that is native to these coalfields is regarded as
|
||
|
||
among the highest quality, with less than 1 percent sulfur, less than
|
||
|
||
10 percent ash, and high heat content. Though production has been
|
||
|
||
declining each year since the early 1990s, the value of the quality
|
||
|
||
coal that remains has increased from the uptake in demand for
|
||
|
||
metallurgical coal and high-grade steam coal according to the
|
||
|
||
Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy.
|
||
|
||
As coal mining has declined, hydraulic fracking of natural gas
|
||
|
||
reserves has heightened in intensity. Continued development of
|
||
|
||
the gas present in the Marcellus Shale sediment formation that
|
||
|
||
extends into this part of Virginia serves as an opportunity for energy
|
||
|
||
independence and economic development, particularly for workers
|
||
|
||
in the out-of-commission coal mines.
|
||
|
||
The Division of Mine Land Reclamation within the Department of
|
||
|
||
Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) is tasked with correcting
|
||
|
||
environmental and public safety hazards posed by abandoned
|
||
|
||
mines and former mining activity like landslides, land subsidence,
|
||
|
||
stream sedimentation, dangerous structures, acid mine drainage
|
||
|
||
and open mine portals. DMME classifies items in three priority
|
||
|
||
levels: Priority 1 - features posing an extreme danger to public
|
||
|
||
health and safety; Priority 2 - features posing adverse effects to
|
||
|
||
public health and safety; and Priority 3 - features posing
|
||
|
||
environmental concerns. There is one Priority 2 hazard within Town
|
||
|
||
boundaries that is prioritized for abatement. According to a
|
||
|
||
representative from DMME, this particular feature is a “low Priority
|
||
|
||
2” as it is the remains of an abandoned brick structure that is causing
|
||
|
||
some erosion. No Priority 1 threats were located within one mile of
|
||
|
||
Town boundaries. Per Figure 12, impacts to local water quality are
|
||
|
||
primarily tied to rural land uses like septic systems and livestock.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
3. Enhance water quality in the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
4, Develop and enhance environmental education oppor-
|
||
tunities for all community members in the Clinch River
|
||
watershed.
|
||
|
||
5. Connect and expand downtown revitalization, marketing
|
||
and entrepreneurial development opportunities in the
|
||
Clinch River Valley.
|
||
|
||
Currently the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has partnered with the
|
||
Richlands Christian Academy on the Mile 3118 Riverbank and
|
||
Riparian Corridor Restoration Project to regrade and stabilize a
|
||
portion of the River in Richlands to its original channel. These local
|
||
and regional efforts are already beginning to pay dividends including
|
||
CRVI being awarded the Scenic Virginia’s Scenic Tourism Award in
|
||
2015.
|
||
|
||
2.4.3 Mineral & Energy Resources
|
||
|
||
Some of the earliest coal mined in America was mined in Central
|
||
Virginia just south of Richmond and for many years, small coal mines
|
||
existed in both eastern Virginia and portions of the Blue Ridge and
|
||
Alleghany Mountains. As the extent of the Southwest Virginia
|
||
Coalfield was more fully explored and with the help of the railroad,
|
||
coal mining in the lucrative Southwest Virginia Coalfield far
|
||
surpassed the production of these early finds and they were all
|
||
abandoned by the early 1950's. In Southwest Virginia there are over
|
||
70 individual coal beds within the rock layer beginning in western
|
||
Tazewell, Russell and Scott Counties and extending further into
|
||
Southwest Virginia and into West Virginia and Kentucky. The
|
||
bituminous coal that is native to these coalfields is regarded as
|
||
among the highest quality, with less than 1 percent sulfur, less than
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
10 percent ash, and high heat content. Though production has been
|
||
declining each year since the early 1990s, the value of the quality
|
||
coal that remains has increased from the uptake in demand for
|
||
metallurgical coal and high-grade steam coal according to the
|
||
Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy.
|
||
|
||
‘As coal mining has declined, hydraulic fracking of natural gas
|
||
reserves has heightened in intensity. Continued development of
|
||
the gas present in the Marcellus Shale sediment formation that
|
||
extends into this part of Virginia serves as an opportunity for energy
|
||
independence and economic development, particularly for workers
|
||
in the out-of-commission coal mines.
|
||
|
||
The Division of Mine Land Reclamation within the Department of
|
||
Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) is tasked with correcting
|
||
environmental and public safety hazards posed by abandoned
|
||
mines and former mining activity like landslides, land subsidence,
|
||
stream sedimentation, dangerous structures, acid mine drainage
|
||
and open mine portals. DMME classifies items in three priority
|
||
levels: Priority 1 - features posing an extreme danger to public
|
||
health and safety; Priority 2 - features posing adverse effects to
|
||
public health and safety; and Priority 3 - features posing
|
||
environmental concerns. There is one Priority 2 hazard within Town
|
||
boundaries that is prioritized for abatement. According to a
|
||
representative from DMME, this particular feature is a “low Priority
|
||
2” as itis the remains of an abandoned brick structure that is causing
|
||
some erosion. No Priority 1 threats were located within one mile of
|
||
Town boundaries. Per Figure 12, impacts to local water quality are
|
||
primarily tied to rural land uses like septic systems and livestock.
|
||
|
||
18
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
19
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
The Town’s waterways and hillsides are valuable assets that should
|
||
|
||
be protected. Local development policies should include building
|
||
|
||
restrictions on steep slopes. Additionally, whether through public
|
||
|
||
or private efforts, opportunities to revegetate stream banks and the
|
||
|
||
banks of the Clinch River should be pursued.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
The Town’s waterways and hillsides are valuable assets that should
|
||
be protected. Local development policies should include building
|
||
restrictions on steep slopes. Additionally, whether through public
|
||
or private efforts, opportunities to revegetate stream banks and the
|
||
banks of the Clinch River should be pursued.
|
||
|
||
19
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
20
|
||
|
||
2.5 EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 Historic Development Patterns
|
||
|
||
The Town’s development patterns grew up around the level ground
|
||
|
||
of the Clinch River Valley and the access provided by the historic
|
||
|
||
Norfolk and Western Railroad. Industrial uses located adjacent to
|
||
|
||
the railroad, commercial districts located nearby along Front Street,
|
||
|
||
and the earliest residential neighborhoods were located within
|
||
|
||
walking distance to both.
|
||
|
||
Development patterns continued to change as Front Street also
|
||
|
||
became U.S. Route 460, an important transportation route for
|
||
|
||
business and industry as well as individual travelers. Shopping
|
||
|
||
centers and other retail uses were positioned along the 460
|
||
|
||
corridor. Given the topography and strong demand for affordable
|
||
|
||
housing, much new housing in Richlands in the middle of the 20th
|
||
|
||
century was manufactured housing built on or next to surrounding
|
||
|
||
hillsides.
|
||
|
||
In 1971 the Route 460 bypass was constructed to reroute through
|
||
|
||
traffic away from Front Street lined with retail shops and the Town’s
|
||
|
||
historic downtown.
|
||
|
||
In 2005, the Town annexed a large section of land to the south and
|
||
|
||
west of its then existing boundaries, increasing total land area from
|
||
|
||
1,674 acres to 3,651 acres. The annexed area includes a series of
|
||
|
||
hills and bisecting streams, as well as additional flat land in the
|
||
|
||
Clinch River Valley. Most of the land in the annexed area is either
|
||
|
||
vacant or residential, and includes the Hidden Valley subdivision
|
||
|
||
and the former Richlands Municipal Airport. Most of the remaining
|
||
|
||
vacant or forested land in the 2005 area is not buildable due to
|
||
|
||
steep slopes. One primary exception is the area surrounding the
|
||
|
||
former airport. This flatland represents the largest area of land
|
||
|
||
within Town boundaries that is suitable for development.
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Existing Land Use
|
||
Within the borders of Richlands there are 3,651 acres of land or
|
||
|
||
about 5.7 square miles. Currently, 44.1% of the Town’s land area is
|
||
|
||
developed. Most of the developed land is dedicated to single-family
|
||
|
||
residential use, which represents 40.0% of all the developed land.
|
||
|
||
Manufactured homes are the second most common use of
|
||
|
||
developed land (excluding road rights-of-way), a use found on
|
||
|
||
10.0% of the developed land. Nearly all residential neighborhoods
|
||
|
||
in Richlands include a mix of stick-built and manufactured housing,
|
||
|
||
the primary exception being the Hidden Valley subdivision which is
|
||
|
||
the only area of Town that is zoned R-1, a zoning classification which
|
||
|
||
excludes manufactured and modular housing. Multifamily develop-
|
||
|
||
ment is very limited and essentially includes only two apartment
|
||
|
||
complexes.
|
||
|
||
Commercial uses are primarily located along the U.S. 460
|
||
|
||
Business/Front Street corridor and make up 7.1% of the developed
|
||
|
||
land. Most retail uses are located in shopping centers while the
|
||
|
||
historic commercial districts include a mix of retail and
|
||
|
||
professional/personal services. Retail use predominates the three
|
||
|
||
commercial land uses and occupies 5.1% of the developed land.
|
||
|
||
This is reflected in Figure 19: Town Employment Trends which
|
||
|
||
identifies Retail Trade and Accommodation and Food Services as the
|
||
|
||
second and third largest employment sectors for the Town.
|
||
|
||
6% of developed land is allocated to industrial uses. Land use that
|
||
|
||
is defined as industrial can include manufacturing, heavy goods
|
||
|
||
storage, or solid waste management. Most industrial uses in
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
2.5 — EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING
|
||
|
||
2.5.1 Historic Development Patterns
|
||
|
||
‘The Town’s development patterns grew up around the level ground
|
||
of the Clinch River Valley and the access provided by the historic
|
||
Norfolk and Western Railroad. Industrial uses located adjacent to
|
||
the railroad, commercial districts located nearby along Front Street,
|
||
and the earliest residential neighborhoods were located within
|
||
walking distance to both.
|
||
|
||
Development patterns continued to change as Front Street also
|
||
became U.S. Route 460, an important transportation route for
|
||
business and industry as well as individual travelers. Shopping
|
||
centers and other retail uses were positioned along the 460
|
||
corridor. Given the topography and strong demand for affordable
|
||
housing, much new housing in Richlands in the middle of the 20"
|
||
century was manufactured housing built on or next to surrounding
|
||
hillsides.
|
||
|
||
In 1971 the Route 460 bypass was constructed to reroute through
|
||
traffic away from Front Street lined with retail shops and the Town's
|
||
historic downtown.
|
||
|
||
In 2005, the Town annexed a large section of land to the south and
|
||
west of its then existing boundaries, increasing total land area from
|
||
1,674 acres to 3,651 acres. The annexed area includes a series of
|
||
hills and bisecting streams, as well as additional flat land in the
|
||
Clinch River Valley. Most of the land in the annexed area is either
|
||
vacant or residential, and includes the Hidden Valley subdivision
|
||
and the former Richlands Municipal Airport. Most of the remaining
|
||
vacant or forested land in the 2005 area is not buildable due to
|
||
steep slopes. One primary exception is the area surrounding the
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
former airport. This flatland represents the largest area of land
|
||
within Town boundaries that is suitable for development.
|
||
|
||
2.5.2 Existing Land Use
|
||
Within the borders of Richlands there are 3,651 acres of land or
|
||
about 5.7 square miles. Currently, 44.1% of the Town’s land area is
|
||
developed. Most of the developed land is dedicated to single-family
|
||
residential use, which represents 40.0% of all the developed land.
|
||
Manufactured homes are the second most common use of
|
||
developed land (excluding road rights-of-way), a use found on
|
||
10.0% of the developed land. Nearly all residential neighborhoods
|
||
in Richlands include a mix of stick-built and manufactured housing,
|
||
the primary exception being the Hidden Valley subdivision which is
|
||
the only area of Town that is zoned R-1, a zoning classification which
|
||
excludes manufactured and modular housing. Multifamily develop-
|
||
ment is very limited and essentially includes only two apartment
|
||
complexes.
|
||
|
||
Commercial uses are primarily located along the U.S. 460
|
||
Business/Front Street corridor and make up 7.1% of the developed
|
||
land. Most retail uses are located in shopping centers while the
|
||
historic commercial districts include a mix of retail and
|
||
professional/personal services. Retail use predominates the three
|
||
commercial land uses and occupies 5.1% of the developed land.
|
||
This is reflected in Figure 19: Town Employment Trends which
|
||
identifies Retail Trade and Accommodation and Food Services as the
|
||
second and third largest employment sectors for the Town.
|
||
|
||
6% of developed land is allocated to industrial uses. Land use that
|
||
is defined as industrial can include manufacturing, heavy goods
|
||
storage, or solid waste management. Most industrial uses in
|
||
|
||
20
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
21
|
||
|
||
Richlands are related to storage, recycling or waste with limited
|
||
|
||
manufacturing. The low percentage of industrial land use is also
|
||
|
||
reflected in Figure 19, which shows that Manufacturing only
|
||
|
||
accounts for a small percentage of total employment.
|
||
|
||
The table in Figure 13 identifies both developed and undeveloped
|
||
|
||
land. 55.9% of all land within the Town is classified as undeveloped,
|
||
|
||
a category that includes agricultural, river, and vacant/forested
|
||
|
||
land. However, only 365 acres (17.8% of the undeveloped land and
|
||
|
||
10.0% of the total land area) is suitable for development. Land
|
||
|
||
considered unsuitable for development includes those areas that
|
||
|
||
are prone to flooding (within the 100-year floodplain) and areas
|
||
|
||
with steep slopes. Steep slope calculations were performed based
|
||
|
||
on the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code/International
|
||
|
||
Building Code standards. Unbuildable vacant land includes flood-
|
||
|
||
plains, slopes of 25% or greater, and a buffer of 27.5 feet adjacent
|
||
|
||
to those slopes (the average of a 15-foot setback from the bottom
|
||
|
||
of a steep slope and a 40-foot setback from the top of a steep slope
|
||
|
||
delineated in the Building Codes).
|
||
|
||
The undeveloped land that is suitable for development includes 280
|
||
|
||
acres that are currently vacant and/or forested and 85 acres of
|
||
|
||
agricultural land. As illustrated in the Land Suitable for Develop-
|
||
|
||
ment Map that follows page 21, much of this buildable land is found
|
||
|
||
in scattered, small sites. The median size of a buildable section of
|
||
|
||
forested land is about 0.10 acres and for agricultural land, 0.5 acres.
|
||
|
||
Figure 13: Existing Land Use
|
||
|
||
Land Use Classification Acres Percent
|
||
|
||
D
|
||
e
|
||
|
||
ve
|
||
lo
|
||
|
||
p
|
||
e
|
||
|
||
d
|
||
L
|
||
|
||
an
|
||
d
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Commercial
|
||
|
||
Retail 82 5.1%
|
||
|
||
General Commercial 17 1.0%
|
||
|
||
Business/Professional 16 1.0%
|
||
|
||
Industrial
|
||
|
||
Light Industrial 87 5.4%
|
||
|
||
Heavy Industrial 3 0.2%
|
||
|
||
Warehousing 6 0.4%
|
||
|
||
Residential
|
||
|
||
Single-Family Residential 643 40.0%
|
||
|
||
Mobile Homes 161 10.0%
|
||
|
||
Multifamily Residential 37 2.3%
|
||
|
||
Public and
|
||
Institutional
|
||
|
||
Community Facilities 81 5.0%
|
||
|
||
Worship/Cemeteries/Lodges 55 3.4%
|
||
|
||
Parks & Recreation 39 2.4%
|
||
|
||
Road/Rail Rights of Way 357 22.2%
|
||
|
||
|
||
Unbuildable Portions 24 1.5%
|
||
|
||
Subtotal - Developed Land 1,608 44.1%
|
||
|
||
U
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
d
|
||
e
|
||
|
||
ve
|
||
lo
|
||
|
||
p
|
||
e
|
||
|
||
d
|
||
|
||
|
||
La
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
d
|
||
|
||
|
||
Suitable for
|
||
Development
|
||
|
||
Agricultural 85 4.1%
|
||
|
||
Vacant/Forested 280 13.7%
|
||
|
||
Not Suitable
|
||
for Develop-
|
||
ment
|
||
|
||
Agricultural 179 8.8%
|
||
|
||
Vacant/Forested 1,458 71.4%
|
||
|
||
River Acreage 40 2.0%
|
||
|
||
Subtotal - Undeveloped Land 2,042 55.9%
|
||
|
||
Total Land Area 3,651 100.0%
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Richlands are related to storage, recycling or waste with limited
|
||
manufacturing. The low percentage of industrial land use is also
|
||
reflected in Figure 19, which shows that Manufacturing only
|
||
accounts for a small percentage of total employment.
|
||
|
||
The table in Figure 13 identifies both developed and undeveloped
|
||
land, 55.9% of all land within the Town is classified as undeveloped,
|
||
a category that includes agricultural, river, and vacant/forested
|
||
land, However, only 365 acres (17.8% of the undeveloped land and
|
||
10.0% of the total land area) is suitable for development. Land
|
||
considered unsuitable for development includes those areas that
|
||
are prone to flooding (within the 100-year floodplain) and areas
|
||
with steep slopes. Steep slope calculations were performed based
|
||
on the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code/international
|
||
Building Code standards. Unbuildable vacant land includes flood-
|
||
plains, slopes of 25% or greater, and a buffer of 27.5 feet adjacent
|
||
to those slopes (the average of a 15-foot setback from the bottom
|
||
of a steep slope and a 40-foot setback from the top of a steep slope
|
||
delineated in the Building Codes).
|
||
|
||
The undeveloped land that is suitable for development includes 280
|
||
acres that are currently vacant and/or forested and 85 acres of
|
||
agricultural land. As illustrated in the Land Suitable for Develop-
|
||
ment Map that follows page 21, much of this buildable land is found
|
||
in scattered, small sites. The median size of a buildable section of
|
||
forested land is about 0.10 acres and for agricultural land, 0.5 acres.
|
||
|
||
Figure 13: Existing Land Use
|
||
|
||
Land Use Classification __Acres__ Percent
|
||
Retail 82 5.1%
|
||
|
||
Commercial | General Commercial a7|__ 1.0%
|
||
Business/Professional 16 1.0%
|
||
|
||
Light industrial a7| 5.4%
|
||
|
||
Industrial Heavy Industrial 3|__0.2%
|
||
|
||
z Warehousing 6| 04%
|
||
z Single-Family Residential 643 | 40.0%
|
||
3 | Resident [ “obit Homes yi [ 100%
|
||
& Multifamily Residential 37| 2.3%
|
||
Community Facilities 81 5.0%
|
||
|
||
Publicand |_Worship/Cemeteries/todges | __55|__3.4%
|
||
Institutional Parks & Recreation 39 2.4%
|
||
Road/Rail Rights of Way 357 22.2%
|
||
|
||
Unbuildable Portions zal 15%
|
||
|
||
Subtotal - Developed Land 1,608 | _ 44.1%
|
||
|
||
s Suitable for Agricultural 85 4.1%
|
||
é . Development | vacant/Forested 280] 13.7%
|
||
25 | notsuitable | Agricultural 179 | 8.8%
|
||
z for Develop: | vacant/Forested 1,458 | 71.4%
|
||
River Acreage 4o| 2.0%
|
||
|
||
‘Subtotal - Undeveloped Land 2,042 | 55.9%
|
||
|
||
Total Land Area | 3,651 | 100.0%
|
||
|
||
21
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
22
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Only 10.0% of the Town’s total land area is undeveloped and
|
||
|
||
suitable for new development. Most of the buildable land classified
|
||
|
||
as vacant/forested is bounded by steep slopes and will only support
|
||
|
||
limited single-family construction. With few buildable acres remain-
|
||
|
||
ing, agricultural land represents the greatest opportunity for new
|
||
|
||
development where located beyond the 100-year floodplain.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
The Town must use the remaining buildable and undeveloped land
|
||
|
||
to best further the goals and objectives identified in this plan. In
|
||
|
||
addition, opportunities for revitalization and redevelopment of land
|
||
|
||
already developed should be considered. Finally, an additional
|
||
|
||
future boundary adjustment might be in order to capture additional
|
||
|
||
land better suited for development than that currently found within
|
||
|
||
the Town limits.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
‘Summary
|
||
|
||
Only 10.0% of the Town’s total land area is undeveloped and
|
||
suitable for new development. Most of the buildable land classified
|
||
as vacant/forested is bounded by steep slopes and will only support
|
||
limited single-family construction. With few buildable acres remain-
|
||
ing, agricultural land represents the greatest opportunity for new
|
||
development where located beyond the 100-year floodplain.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
The Town must use the remaining buildable and undeveloped land
|
||
to best further the goals and objectives identified in this plan. In
|
||
addition, opportunities for revitalization and redevelopment of land
|
||
already developed should be considered. Finally, an additional
|
||
future boundary adjustment might be in order to capture additional
|
||
land better suited for development than that currently found within
|
||
the Town limits.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
22
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
EXISTING LAND USE
|
||
|
||
-SOWPRENENSIVE PLAN STUDY
|
||
|
||
(OF RICHLANDS, VIRGINIA
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
LAND SUITABLE FOR —,
|
||
COMPREHENSIVE
|
||
‘Town oF cuban
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
23
|
||
|
||
2.5.3 Existing Zoning
|
||
The Richlands Zoning Ordinance, adopted in 1971, classifies all Town
|
||
|
||
land into six categories or districts:
|
||
|
||
Limited Residential (R-1) – a single-family classification that
|
||
|
||
restricts manufactured or pre-fabricated housing.
|
||
|
||
General Residential (R-2) – a classification that allows a wide
|
||
|
||
range of residential uses, including stick-built and
|
||
|
||
manufactured single-family residences, townhomes,
|
||
|
||
multifamily structures as well as some commercial and
|
||
|
||
institutional uses. R-2 is the most widely applied district in
|
||
|
||
the Town, including most undeveloped land.
|
||
|
||
General Business (B-2) – a commercial classification that
|
||
|
||
permits retail businesses, office buildings and some
|
||
|
||
institutional uses (e.g. churches, libraries). It allows for
|
||
|
||
commercial uses that generate traffic and deliveries but
|
||
|
||
excludes industrial uses.
|
||
|
||
General Industrial (M-1) – an industrial classification that
|
||
|
||
permits manufacturing and heavy goods storage that can be
|
||
|
||
located near residential areas without creating a nuisance.
|
||
|
||
Prior to issuing a building permit for a new use, plans must
|
||
|
||
be submitted that demonstrate the proposed use will not
|
||
|
||
create a nuisance.
|
||
|
||
General Agricultural (A-1) – a classification that allows
|
||
|
||
agriculture, dairying and forestry uses, as well as a broad list
|
||
|
||
of residential uses, limited commercial uses and limited
|
||
|
||
recreational uses with conditions.
|
||
|
||
Special Conservation (C-1) – a classification that is intended
|
||
|
||
to protect environmentally sensitive areas and flood plains
|
||
|
||
and allows for agricultural uses. This classification has not
|
||
|
||
been assigned to any land parcels at this point.
|
||
|
||
The Existing Zoning Map that follows page 23 shows where the
|
||
|
||
different classifications have been applied. It further shows were
|
||
|
||
the Town has chosen to put in place mixed zoning with three
|
||
|
||
combinations: M-1/B-2, M-1/R-2 and B-2/R-2. This very unusual
|
||
|
||
provision came about when the Zoning Ordinance was created
|
||
|
||
because there were areas in Town that did not neatly break out into
|
||
|
||
the established districts.
|
||
|
||
Recent amendments to the Zoning Ordinance include the addition
|
||
|
||
of the R-1 residential district for the Hidden Valley subdivision in
|
||
|
||
2005 and the reversion of some of those parcels to an R-2
|
||
|
||
designation in 2011. Any land use that is not specifically permitted
|
||
|
||
by the zoning ordinance for the district in which it is located, but
|
||
|
||
was already present before the zoning ordinance was adopted or
|
||
|
||
changed, is considered a nonconforming use. The State of Virginia
|
||
|
||
gives protection to nonconforming uses, with some limits, in Title
|
||
|
||
15.2, Chapter 22, Section 2307 of the Code of Virginia.
|
||
|
||
Nonconforming uses may legally continue indefinitely so long as the
|
||
|
||
building’s use isn’t discontinued for a period of at least two years.
|
||
|
||
The law gives particular protections to manufactured homes. Any
|
||
|
||
nonconforming manufactured home can be replaced with a newer
|
||
|
||
model and keep its nonconforming status.
|
||
|
||
The Nonconforming Land Uses Map that follows page 23 identifies
|
||
|
||
those buildings that may be considered nonconforming. This map
|
||
|
||
is intended to be general in nature and each building’s status should
|
||
|
||
be verified individually. The largest concentrations of non-
|
||
|
||
conforming uses are located in historically residential areas that
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
2.5.3. Existing Zoning
|
||
The Richlands Zoning Ordinance, adopted in 1971, classifies all Town
|
||
land into six categories or districts:
|
||
|
||
© Limited Residential (R-1) - a single-family classification that
|
||
restricts manufactured or pre-fabricated housing,
|
||
|
||
* General Residential (R-2)—a classification that allows a wide
|
||
range of residential uses, including stick-built and
|
||
manufactured single-family residences, townhomes,
|
||
multifamily structures as well as some commercial and
|
||
institutional uses. R-2 is the most widely applied district in
|
||
the Town, including most undeveloped land.
|
||
|
||
General Business (B-2) — a commercial classification that
|
||
permits retail businesses, office buildings and some
|
||
institutional uses (e.g. churches, libraries). It allows for
|
||
commercial uses that generate traffic and deliveries but
|
||
excludes industrial uses.
|
||
|
||
* General Industrial (M-1) - an industrial classification that
|
||
permits manufacturing and heavy goods storage that can be
|
||
located near residential areas without creating a nuisance.
|
||
Prior to issuing a building permit for a new use, plans must
|
||
be submitted that demonstrate the proposed use will not
|
||
create a nuisance.
|
||
|
||
© General Agricultural (A-1) - a classification that allows
|
||
agriculture, dairying and forestry uses, as well as a broad list
|
||
of residential uses, limited commercial uses and limited
|
||
recreational uses with conditions.
|
||
|
||
‘Special Conservation (C-1) ~ a classification that is intended
|
||
|
||
to protect environmentally sensitive areas and flood plains
|
||
and allows for agricultural uses. This classification has not
|
||
been assigned to any land parcels at this point.
|
||
|
||
The Existing Zoning Map that follows page 23 shows where the
|
||
different classifications have been applied. It further shows were
|
||
the Town has chosen to put in place mixed zoning with three
|
||
combinations: M-1/B-2, M-1/R-2 and B-2/R-2. This very unusual
|
||
provision came about when the Zoning Ordinance was created
|
||
because there were areas in Town that did not neatly break out into
|
||
the established districts.
|
||
|
||
Recent amendments to the Zoning Ordinance include the addition
|
||
of the R-1 residential district for the Hidden Valley subdivision in
|
||
2005 and the reversion of some of those parcels to an R-2
|
||
designation in 2011. Any land use that is not specifically permitted
|
||
by the zoning ordinance for the district in which it is located, but
|
||
was already present before the zoning ordinance was adopted or
|
||
changed, is considered a nonconforming use. The State of Virginia
|
||
gives protection to nonconforming uses, with some limits, in Title
|
||
15.2, Chapter 22, Section 2307 of the Code of Virginia.
|
||
Nonconforming uses may legally continue indefinitely so long as the
|
||
building's use isn’t discontinued for a period of at least two years.
|
||
The law gives particular protections to manufactured homes. Any
|
||
nonconforming manufactured home can be replaced with a newer
|
||
model and keep its nonconforming status.
|
||
|
||
The Nonconforming Land Uses Map that follows page 23 identifies
|
||
those buildings that may be considered nonconforming. This map
|
||
is intended to be general in nature and each building's status should
|
||
be verified individually. The largest concentrations of non-
|
||
conforming uses are located in historically residential areas that
|
||
|
||
23
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
24
|
||
|
||
have been zoned for future commercial or industrial uses. In some
|
||
|
||
cases, these areas are intact residential neighborhoods and historic
|
||
|
||
districts. In addition to nonconforming residential uses, there are
|
||
|
||
also a few commercial and industrial nonconforming uses located in
|
||
|
||
the area that was annexed into the Town.
|
||
|
||
Local governments have statutory authority per the Code of Virginia
|
||
|
||
to enact and enforce zoning ordinances. The enabling legislation for
|
||
|
||
zoning is amended on a fairly regular basis and local zoning
|
||
|
||
ordinances should be reviewed periodically to ensure that they are
|
||
|
||
in compliance with state law. The Richlands Zoning Ordinance has
|
||
|
||
not been reviewed recently and in light of ongoing changes in the
|
||
|
||
enabling legislation, should be updated in the very near future.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
There are areas where the Town’s historic development patterns do
|
||
|
||
not match up with the allowable uses and the geography assigned
|
||
|
||
to the various zoning districts. Additionally, the Town’s most
|
||
|
||
prevalent residential zoning district is very permissive and allows a
|
||
|
||
wide range of residential uses, including manufactured, stick-built
|
||
|
||
and multifamily housing. Finally, the Richlands Zoning Ordinance
|
||
|
||
likely needs to be reviewed and updated.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
The Town needs to add additional residential categories to
|
||
|
||
encourage and guide the development of the housing stock that is
|
||
|
||
needed for the future, particularly townhomes, apartments, and
|
||
|
||
housing appropriate for senior adults.
|
||
|
||
The Town must continue to balance a need for an expanded
|
||
|
||
economic base through commercial and industrial development
|
||
|
||
and a need to protect established single-family neighborhoods. As
|
||
|
||
the Town considers locations for economic development,
|
||
|
||
residential neighborhoods that are zoned for commercial or
|
||
|
||
industrial uses should be rezoned.
|
||
|
||
Finally, the Town should consider including development standards
|
||
|
||
in the Zoning Ordinance that protect sensitive environmental areas
|
||
|
||
such as creeks, rivers, floodplains and steep slopes in accordance
|
||
|
||
with the Uniform Statewide Building Code and Erosion and
|
||
|
||
Sediment Control Act.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
have been zoned for future commercial or industrial uses. In some
|
||
cases, these areas are intact residential neighborhoods and historic
|
||
districts. In addition to nonconforming residential uses, there are
|
||
also a few commercial and industrial nonconforming uses located in
|
||
the area that was annexed into the Town.
|
||
|
||
Local governments have statutory authority per the Code of Virginia
|
||
to enact and enforce zoning ordinances. The enabling legislation for
|
||
zoning is amended on a fairly regular basis and local zoning
|
||
ordinances should be reviewed periodically to ensure that they are
|
||
in compliance with state law. The Richlands Zoning Ordinance has
|
||
not been reviewed recently and in light of ongoing changes in the
|
||
enabling legislation, should be updated in the very near future.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
There are areas where the Town's historic development patterns do
|
||
not match up with the allowable uses and the geography assigned
|
||
to the various zoning districts. Additionally, the Town’s most
|
||
prevalent residential zoning district is very permissive and allows a
|
||
wide range of residential uses, including manufactured, stick-built
|
||
and multifamily housing. Finally, the Richlands Zoning Ordinance
|
||
likely needs to be reviewed and updated.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
The Town needs to add additional residential categori
|
||
encourage and guide the development of the housing stock that is
|
||
needed for the future, particularly townhomes, apartments, and
|
||
housing appropriate for senior adults.
|
||
|
||
to
|
||
|
||
The Town must continue to balance a need for an expanded
|
||
economic base through commercial and industrial development
|
||
and a need to protect established single-family neighborhoods. As
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
the Town considers locations for economic development,
|
||
residential neighborhoods that are zoned for commercial or
|
||
industrial uses should be rezoned.
|
||
|
||
Finally, the Town should consider including development standards
|
||
in the Zoning Ordinance that protect sensitive environmental areas
|
||
such as creeks, rivers, floodplains and steep slopes in accordance
|
||
with the Uniform Statewide Building Code and Erosion and
|
||
Sediment Control Act.
|
||
|
||
24
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
EXISTING ZONING
|
||
(COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STUDY
|
||
TOWN OF RICHLANDS, VIRGINIA
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NONCONFORMING LAND USES
|
||
|
||
“OMPREHENSIVE PLAN STUDY.
|
||
(OF RICHLANDS, VIRGINIA
|
||
|
||
SP,
|
||
|
||
"TOWN OF
|
||
RICHLANDS
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
2.6 ECONOMY
|
||
The economy in Richlands is tied to statewide, national and
|
||
|
||
international market trends. Its location along the Norfolk Southern
|
||
|
||
Railroad connects the coal fields of the Appalachian Plateau to the
|
||
|
||
Port of Norfolk and to markets around the globe. Additionally, its
|
||
|
||
location in western Tazewell County, on the U.S. Route 460 and near
|
||
|
||
the U.S. Route 19 corridors ties its local economy with the
|
||
|
||
economies of Russell and Buchanan Counties as well as greater
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County.
|
||
|
||
Within this three-county region, Tazewell County has the largest
|
||
|
||
employment base. Trade, Transportation, & Utilities employ the
|
||
|
||
most people, and within that sector, retail trade jobs dominate.
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing and Natural Resources & Mining both rank below
|
||
|
||
Education & Health Services and Leisure and Hospitality
|
||
|
||
Like Tazewell County, Russell County’s largest and second largest
|
||
|
||
employment sectors are the Trade, Transportation, & Utilities
|
||
|
||
sector and Education and Health Services sector, respectively.
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County is unique among the three in that its largest
|
||
|
||
employment sector is Natural Resources & Mining due to its
|
||
|
||
location more squarely in the heart of the coal fields.
|
||
|
||
Figure 15 on the next page shows the Location Quotient for each
|
||
|
||
sector. The Location Quotient (LQ) measures the saturation of an
|
||
|
||
industry sector as compared to the national average. The LQ helps
|
||
|
||
determine the number of dollars that an industry is drawing or not
|
||
|
||
drawing from outside the market area. For example, with an LQ of
|
||
|
||
3.7, the Natural Resources & Mining sector is nearly four times more
|
||
|
||
concentrated within Tazewell County than the national average.
|
||
|
||
Industries with an LQ over 1.0 are called Basic Industries because
|
||
|
||
they draw money from outside of the community and form the base
|
||
|
||
of the economy. This base is typically where a locality’s better
|
||
|
||
paying jobs are created in a good economy and lost in a bad
|
||
|
||
economy.
|
||
|
||
Figure 14: Employment by Industry 2015
|
||
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Russell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Base Industry: Total All Industries 17,883 5,728 5,103
|
||
|
||
Trade, Transportation, & Utilities 3,864 1,206 1,227
|
||
|
||
Education & Health Services 4,016 839 1,047
|
||
|
||
Leisure and Hospitality 1,393 305 488
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing 1,178 199 187
|
||
|
||
Professional & Business Services 998 691 741
|
||
|
||
Natural Resources & Mining 761 1,613 304
|
||
|
||
Financial Activities 542 186 257
|
||
|
||
Construction 603 520 400
|
||
|
||
Other Services 911 ND 166
|
||
|
||
Information 90 ND 287
|
||
|
||
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
|
||
|
||
ND: Non-disclosable indicates a local industry that is comprised of only a small
|
||
|
||
number of employers and information is withheld to protect company specific data.
|
||
|
||
An industry sector with an LQ less than 1.0 means that that industry
|
||
|
||
is less concentrated in that county than the national average and is
|
||
|
||
solely reliant on dollars present in the local economy. Additionally,
|
||
|
||
an LQ less that one means that dollars in that industry are flowing
|
||
|
||
to other localities as local citizens spend their money elsewhere.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
2.6 ECONOMY
|
||
|
||
The economy in Richlands is tied to statewide, national and
|
||
international market trends. Its location along the Norfolk Southern
|
||
Railroad connects the coal fields of the Appalachian Plateau to the
|
||
Port of Norfolk and to markets around the globe. Additionally, its
|
||
location in western Tazewell County, on the U.S. Route 460 and near
|
||
the U.S. Route 19 corridors ties its local economy with the
|
||
economies of Russell and Buchanan Counties as well as greater
|
||
Tazewell County.
|
||
|
||
Within this three-county region, Tazewell County has the largest
|
||
employment base. Trade, Transportation, & Utilities employ the
|
||
most people, and within that sector, retail trade jobs dominate.
|
||
Manufacturing and Natural Resources & Mining both rank below
|
||
Education & Health Services and Leisure and Hospitality
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County, Russell County's largest and second largest
|
||
employment sectors are the Trade, Transportation, & Utilities
|
||
sector and Education and Health Services sector, respectively.
|
||
Buchanan County is unique among the three in that its largest
|
||
employment sector is Natural Resources & Mining due to its
|
||
location more squarely in the heart of the coal fields.
|
||
|
||
Figure 15 on the next page shows the Location Quotient for each
|
||
sector. The Location Quotient (LQ) measures the saturation of an
|
||
industry sector as compared to the national average. The LQ helps
|
||
determine the number of dollars that an industry is drawing or not
|
||
drawing from outside the market area. For example, with an LQ of
|
||
3.7, the Natural Resources & Mining sector is nearly four times more
|
||
concentrated within Tazewell County than the national average.
|
||
Industries with an LQ over 1.0 are called Basic Industries because
|
||
|
||
they draw money from outside of the community and form the base
|
||
of the economy. This base is typically where a locality’s better
|
||
paying jobs are created in a good economy and lost in a bad
|
||
economy.
|
||
|
||
Figure 14: Employment by Industry 2015
|
||
|
||
Tazewell Buchanan Russell
|
||
|
||
County County County
|
||
Base Industry: Tota All Industries 1788 sms 508
|
||
Trade, Transportation, & Utilities 36s 1,206 1,227
|
||
Education & Health Services 4016 839 1,047
|
||
Leisure and Hospitality 1393 305 a8.
|
||
Manufacturing 178 199 187
|
||
Professional & Business Services 998 oot rat
|
||
Natural Resources & Mining 711613 308
|
||
Financial Activities 542 186 257
|
||
Construction 603 520400
|
||
other Services ai ND 166
|
||
Information 30 ND 287
|
||
|
||
‘Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
|
||
|
||
ND: Non-disclosable indicates a local industry that is comprised of only a small
|
||
‘number of employers and information is withheld to protect company specific data
|
||
|
||
‘An industry sector with an LQ less than 1.0 means that that industry
|
||
is less concentrated in that county than the national average and is
|
||
solely reliant on dollars present in the local economy. Additionally,
|
||
an LQ less that one means that dollars in that industry are flowing
|
||
to other localities as local citizens spend their money elsewhere.
|
||
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
26
|
||
|
||
These industries are considered Non-Basic Industries. In any
|
||
|
||
economy there will be a mix of both types, but the impact of a miner
|
||
|
||
losing a job in Russell County is much greater than a waiter at a local
|
||
|
||
restaurant losing a job because the miner’s job was bringing wealth
|
||
|
||
from outside the county and the waiter’s job was being supported
|
||
|
||
only locally by the miner’s disposable income.
|
||
|
||
Figure 15: Location Quotient by Sector 2014
|
||
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Russell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Base Industry: Total All Industries 1.00 1.00 1.00
|
||
|
||
Natural Resources & Mining 9.04 32.45 8.80
|
||
|
||
Trade, Transportation, & Utilities 1.32 0.84 0.91
|
||
|
||
Education & Health Services 1.14 0.91 1.13
|
||
|
||
Other Services 1.56 0.53 0.61
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing 1.13 0.37 0.87
|
||
|
||
Construction 0.73 1.03 1.54
|
||
|
||
Leisure and Hospitality 0.81 0.38 0.67
|
||
|
||
Financial Activities 0.68 0.46 0.69
|
||
|
||
Professional & Business Services 0.33 0.49 0.73
|
||
|
||
Information 0.28 0.18 0.41
|
||
|
||
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
|
||
|
||
The location quotient of the Natural Resources & Mining sector is
|
||
|
||
the largest in all three counties. In Buchanan County in particular,
|
||
|
||
this sector has an oversized impact on the overall economy.
|
||
|
||
Fluctuations in this sector can have a huge impact on all other job
|
||
|
||
holders in Buchanan. In Russell County, coal is still “king” but the
|
||
|
||
Information sector is the strongest alternative to the mining
|
||
|
||
industry as a result of the new employment created by call centers
|
||
|
||
that have opened in the County in recent years.
|
||
|
||
In Tazewell County, four sectors are shown to be supportive of the
|
||
|
||
rest of the economy – Natural Resources & Mining, Trade,
|
||
|
||
Transportation, & Utilities, Education & Health Services and Other
|
||
|
||
Services. The following industrial subsectors represent the strongest
|
||
|
||
component of each identified sector:
|
||
|
||
1. Natural Resources & Mining
|
||
|
||
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
|
||
|
||
2. Trade, Transportation, & Utilities
|
||
|
||
Retail Trade
|
||
|
||
3. Education & Health Services
|
||
|
||
Educational Services
|
||
|
||
Health Care and Social Assistance
|
||
|
||
4. Other Services
|
||
|
||
Repair and Maintenance
|
||
|
||
Personal and Laundry Services
|
||
|
||
As can be seen in Figure 16 on the next page, private sector
|
||
|
||
employment has dropped in all three counties in the region from
|
||
|
||
2004-2014. Both Tazewell County and Russell County lost hundreds
|
||
|
||
of jobs. Tazewell County lost almost 1,000 jobs, mostly from
|
||
|
||
manufacturing and retail trade. The largest increase in employment
|
||
|
||
and Location Quotient for Tazewell County came from the Natural
|
||
|
||
Resources & Mining sector. The County also saw modest gains in
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
These industries are considered Non-Basic Industries. In any
|
||
economy there will be a mix of both types, but the impact of a miner
|
||
losing a job in Russell County is much greater than a waiter at a local
|
||
restaurant losing a job because the miner's job was bringing wealth
|
||
from outside the county and the waiter’s job was being supported
|
||
only locally by the miner's
|
||
|
||
Figure 15: Location Quotient by Sector 2014
|
||
|
||
Tazewell Buchanan Russell
|
||
|
||
County County __County
|
||
Base Industry: Total All Industries 1.00 1.00 1.00
|
||
Natural Resources & Mining 904 32.45 8.80
|
||
Trade, Transportation, & Utilities 132 084 91
|
||
Education & Health Services 114 ost 413
|
||
Other Services 156 os3 ost
|
||
Manufacturing 113 037 087
|
||
Construction 073 1.03 154
|
||
Leisure and Hospitality ost 0.38 067
|
||
Financial Activities 068 0.46 0.69
|
||
Professional & Business Services 0.33 0.49 0.73,
|
||
Information 028 0.18 oat
|
||
|
||
‘Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
|
||
|
||
The location quotient of the Natural Resources & Mining sector is
|
||
the largest in all three counties. In Buchanan County in particular,
|
||
this sector has an oversized impact on the overall economy.
|
||
Fluctuations in this sector can have a huge impact on all other job
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
holders in Buchanan. In Russell County, coal is still “king” but the
|
||
Information sector is the strongest alternative to the mining
|
||
industry as a result of the new employment created by call centers
|
||
that have opened in the County in recent years.
|
||
|
||
In Tazewell County, four sectors are shown to be supportive of the
|
||
rest of the economy ~ Natural Resources & Mining, Trade,
|
||
Transportation, & Utilities, Education & Health Services and Other
|
||
Services. The following industrial subsectors represent the strongest
|
||
component of each identified sector:
|
||
|
||
1. Natural Resources & Mining
|
||
‘© Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
|
||
|
||
2. Trade, Transportation, & Utilities
|
||
© Retail Trade
|
||
|
||
3. Education & Health Services
|
||
‘* Educational Services
|
||
‘* Health Care and Social Assistance
|
||
|
||
4, Other Services
|
||
* Repair and Maintenance
|
||
* Personal and Laundry Services
|
||
|
||
‘As can be seen in Figure 16 on the next page, private sector
|
||
employment has dropped in all three counties in the region from
|
||
2004-2014. Both Tazewell County and Russell County lost hundreds
|
||
of jobs. Tazewell County lost almost 1,000 jobs, mostly from
|
||
manufacturing and retail trade. The largest increase in employment
|
||
and Location Quotient for Tazewell County came from the Natural
|
||
Resources & Mining sector. The County also saw modest gains in
|
||
|
||
26
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
27
|
||
|
||
the Construction, Professional & Business Services and Leisure &
|
||
|
||
Hospitality sectors.
|
||
|
||
Figure 16: 2004-2014 Employment Changes
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Tazewell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Buchanan
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
Russell
|
||
County
|
||
|
||
No. LQ No. LQ No. LQ
|
||
|
||
Base Industry: Total All Industries -972
|
||
|
||
|
||
- -62 - -1,404 0
|
||
|
||
Trade, Transportation, & Utilities -588 -0.05 -61 -0.01 -192 0.12
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing -331 0.07 -140 -0.12 -1,287 -1.37
|
||
|
||
Financial Activities -150 -0.05 -20 0 -25 0.16
|
||
|
||
Education & Health Services -148 -0.20 10 -0.15 61 0.13
|
||
|
||
Other Services -121 -0.08 - - 51 0.44
|
||
|
||
Information -77 -0.15 - - -183 -0.15
|
||
|
||
Construction 36 0.26 -133 -0.05 -222 -0.02
|
||
|
||
Leisure and Hospitality 51 0.02 -50 -0.11 177 0.34
|
||
|
||
Professional & Business Services 107 0.05 391 0.39 323 0.45
|
||
|
||
Natural Resources & Mining 248 0.93 -3 -2.37 -106 -0.76
|
||
|
||
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
|
||
|
||
Russell County lost over 20% of its workforce, largely from a loss in
|
||
|
||
manufacturing jobs. In spite of having a strong LQ, Russell County
|
||
|
||
had a net loss of 183 jobs in the Information sector. Buchanan
|
||
|
||
County only lost 62 jobs and saw the biggest job gain out of any
|
||
|
||
sector in any county from the Professional & Business Services
|
||
|
||
sector.
|
||
|
||
Natural Resources and Mining
|
||
|
||
In all three counties, Natural Resources and Mining remains the
|
||
|
||
strongest Basic Industry even as employment has shifted within the
|
||
|
||
industry. This is likely due to the growth of hydraulic fracking of
|
||
|
||
natural gas and the dollars it brings into the local economy. This
|
||
|
||
sector is particularly gaining momentum in Tazewell County, while
|
||
|
||
Buchanan County remains most reliant on the sector. However,
|
||
|
||
related to the coal industry specifically, the tonnage of coal pro-
|
||
|
||
duced and the number of mining jobs have been steadily falling in
|
||
|
||
Virginia as a whole. (see figure 17)
|
||
|
||
Figure 17: 1980-2010 Virginia Coal Industry Trends
|
||
|
||
Annual Tonnage Total Employees
|
||
|
||
1980 42,794,010 18,688
|
||
|
||
1990 46,636,708 10,265
|
||
|
||
2000 33,259,580 4,948
|
||
|
||
2010 22,149,326 4,671
|
||
|
||
Source: Virginia Department of Mines Minerals and Energy
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing Sector
|
||
|
||
Compared to some other communities, manufacturing is not as
|
||
|
||
strong in Tazewell and surrounding counties. However, with an LQ
|
||
|
||
of 0.99, the Manufacturing sector comes close to hitting a 1.0 LQ
|
||
|
||
which would indicate a balanced presence in the Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
economy. Manufacturing employment in Tazewell County does
|
||
|
||
account for 11% of all employment. Per the 2012 edition of County
|
||
|
||
Business Patterns produced by the U.S. Census Bureau, Richlands
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
the Construction, Professional & Business Services and Leisure &
|
||
Hospitality sectors.
|
||
|
||
Figure 16: 2004-2014 Employment Changes,
|
||
|
||
Tazewell Buchanan Russell
|
||
|
||
County ‘county County
|
||
|
||
No. 1Q No, 1a No.
|
||
Base Industry: Total Allindustries __-972 = 62-108
|
||
Trade, Transportation & Utlities 588-005 61-001 1920.12
|
||
Manufacturing “3310.07 -140-0.12_-1,287_-1.37
|
||
Financial Activities -150_-005 200 25s
|
||
Education & Health Services, “M8020 10-015 ots
|
||
Other Services “121 -0.08 - 51a
|
||
Information 7-048 - = 183-015
|
||
Construction 36026 133-005-222 -0.02
|
||
Leisure and Hospitality 51002-50011 1770.38
|
||
Professional & Business Services 107005 391039 3230.45
|
||
Natural Resources & Mining 248093 3-237 _-106_-0.76
|
||
|
||
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
|
||
|
||
Russell County lost over 20% of its workforce, largely from a loss in
|
||
manufacturing jobs. In spite of having a strong LQ, Russell County
|
||
had a net loss of 183 jobs in the Information sector. Buchanan
|
||
County only lost 62 jobs and saw the biggest job gain out of any
|
||
sector in any county from the Professional & Business Services
|
||
sector.
|
||
|
||
Natural Resources and Mining
|
||
|
||
In all three counties, Natural Resources and Mining remains the
|
||
strongest Basic Industry even as employment has shifted within the
|
||
industry. This is likely due to the growth of hydraulic fracking of
|
||
natural gas and the dollars it brings into the local economy. This
|
||
sector is particularly gaining momentum in Tazewell County, while
|
||
Buchanan County remains most reliant on the sector. However,
|
||
related to the coal industry specifically, the tonnage of coal pro-
|
||
duced and the number of mining jobs have been steadily falling in
|
||
Virginia as a whole. (see figure 17)
|
||
|
||
Figure 17: 1980-2010 Vi Coal Industry Trends
|
||
|
||
Annual Tonnage Total Employee:
|
||
|
||
1980 42,794,010 18,688
|
||
1990 46,636,708 10,265
|
||
2000 33,259,580 4948
|
||
2010 22,149,326 4671
|
||
|
||
‘Source: Virginia Department of Mines Minerals and Energy
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing Sector
|
||
|
||
Compared to some other communities, manufacturing is not as
|
||
strong in Tazewell and surrounding counties. However, with an LQ
|
||
of 0.99, the Manufacturing sector comes close to hitting a 1.0 LQ
|
||
which would indicate a balanced presence in the Tazewell County
|
||
economy. Manufacturing employment in Tazewell County does
|
||
account for 11% of all employment. Per the 2012 edition of County
|
||
Business Patterns produced by the U.S. Census Bureau, Richlands
|
||
|
||
27
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
28
|
||
|
||
had a few small manufacturing firms and one larger construction
|
||
|
||
machinery manufacturer.
|
||
|
||
Retail
|
||
|
||
In Tazewell County, the Retail Trade subsector has a Location
|
||
|
||
Quotient of 1.79, meaning that the County’s retail outlets serve
|
||
|
||
more than just local residents and bring money into the County from
|
||
|
||
residents who reside outside of the County. It also represents
|
||
|
||
almost a quarter (24%) of all employment in the County. Retail
|
||
|
||
employment in Richlands is more centered on small businesses,
|
||
|
||
with only 1 of every 44 retail establishments employing more than
|
||
|
||
50 people and because of this, the Town has a lower percentage of
|
||
|
||
jobs in retail than the County overall.
|
||
|
||
Health Care and Social Assistance
|
||
|
||
In northwestern Tazewell County, 45% of all civilian employment (or
|
||
|
||
755 jobs) is in the Education, Health Care & Social Assistance sector
|
||
|
||
according to the American Community Survey, 2009-2013 5-year
|
||
|
||
estimates. Notably, Clinch Valley Heath (CVH) employs 687 persons
|
||
|
||
with an annual payroll of over $43 million. CVH is comprised of four
|
||
|
||
entities: Clinch Valley Medical Center, a 175-bed acute care hospital
|
||
|
||
offering cancer services and specialty care for the heart, lungs, and
|
||
|
||
vascular systems, emergency services, physical rehabilitation,
|
||
|
||
pediatrics, obstetrics, and advanced diagnostics; Clinch Valley
|
||
|
||
Physician Practices, a comprehensive group of physicians and
|
||
|
||
surgeons; Preferred Home Health Services, a full-service healthcare
|
||
|
||
agency providing quality home healthcare for patients in Southwest
|
||
|
||
Virginia; and Clinch Valley Urgent Care providing walk-in care during
|
||
|
||
early and late hours and weekends including X-ray, drug testing, and
|
||
|
||
laboratory services. CVH is a key player in the local economy and
|
||
|
||
pays $512,652 in local taxes annually.
|
||
|
||
Town Employment
|
||
|
||
Private sector jobs in the Town of Richlands have fallen by 16%
|
||
|
||
between 1998 and 2012. Figure 18 shows a negative trend despite
|
||
|
||
employment shifting upward in 2012. It is unclear whether or not
|
||
|
||
future employment will continue to increase and reverse this long-
|
||
|
||
term negative trend. Figure 19 on page 28 displays the estimated
|
||
|
||
number of private sector jobs for top local employment sectors and
|
||
|
||
their variation from 1998 to 2012. The Town’s largest employment
|
||
|
||
subsector, Health Care & Social Assistance, has decreased in the
|
||
|
||
number of jobs since 2008, but still has more employees than in 1998.
|
||
|
||
Figure 18: Total Town Employment
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census – County Business Patterns (24641 ZIP Code)
|
||
|
||
This subsector is projected to grow nationwide and with the
|
||
|
||
continued success of Clinch Valley Health, this number has most
|
||
|
||
likely begun to increase again. Given its impact as a job creator, the
|
||
|
||
trending growth or decline of this sector will be important to
|
||
|
||
monitor as well as any other medical employment centers in the
|
||
|
||
region and their impact on Richlands as a healthcare destination.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2000
|
||
|
||
2200
|
||
|
||
2400
|
||
|
||
2600
|
||
|
||
2800
|
||
|
||
3000
|
||
|
||
3200
|
||
|
||
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
|
||
|
||
Total Employment
|
||
|
||
Linear (Total
|
||
Employment)
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
had a few small manufacturing firms and one larger construction
|
||
machinery manufacturer.
|
||
|
||
Retail
|
||
|
||
In Tazewell County, the Retail Trade subsector has a Location
|
||
Quotient of 1.79, meaning that the County's retail outlets serve
|
||
more than just local residents and bring money into the County from
|
||
residents who reside outside of the County. It also represents
|
||
almost a quarter (24%) of all employment in the County. Retail
|
||
employment in Richlands is more centered on small businesses,
|
||
with only 1 of every 44 retail establishments employing more than
|
||
50 people and because of this, the Town has a lower percentage of
|
||
jobs in retail than the County overall.
|
||
|
||
Health Care and Social Assistance
|
||
In northwestern Tazewell County, 45% of all civilian employment (or
|
||
755 jobs) is in the Education, Health Care & Social Assistance sector
|
||
according to the American Community Survey, 2009-2013 S-year
|
||
estimates. Notably, Clinch Valley Heath (CVH) employs 687 persons
|
||
with an annual payroll of over $43 million. CVH is comprised of four
|
||
entities: Clinch Valley Medical Center, a 175-bed acute care hospital
|
||
offering cancer services and specialty care for the heart, lungs, and
|
||
vascular systems, emergency services, physical rehabilitation,
|
||
pediatrics, obstetrics, and advanced diagnostics; Clinch Valley
|
||
Physician Practices, a comprehensive group of physicians and
|
||
surgeons; Preferred Home Health Services, a full-service healthcare
|
||
agency providing quality home healthcare for patients in Southwest
|
||
Virginia; and Clinch Valley Urgent Care providing walk-in care during
|
||
early and late hours and weekends including X-ray, drug testing, and
|
||
laboratory services. CVH is a key player in the local economy and
|
||
pays $512,652 in local taxes annually.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Town Employment
|
||
|
||
Private sector jobs in the Town of Richlands have fallen by 16%
|
||
between 1998 and 2012. Figure 18 shows a negative trend despite
|
||
employment shifting upward in 2012. It is unclear whether or not
|
||
future employment will continue to increase and reverse this long-
|
||
term negative trend. Figure 19 on page 28 displays the estimated
|
||
number of private sector jobs for top local employment sectors and
|
||
their variation from 1998 to 2012. The Town's largest employment
|
||
subsector, Health Care & Social Assistance, has decreased in the
|
||
number of jobs since 2008, but still has more employees than in 1998.
|
||
|
||
Figure 18: Total Town Employment
|
||
|
||
3200 4
|
||
|
||
3000 +
|
||
2800 + Total Employment
|
||
2600 +
|
||
|
||
2400 + —Linear (Total
|
||
|
||
a9 | Employment)
|
||
2000 |
|
||
|
||
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
|
||
|
||
‘Source: U.S. Census ~ County Business Pattems (24641 ZIP Code)
|
||
|
||
This subsector is projected to grow nationwide and with the
|
||
continued success of Clinch Valley Health, this number has most
|
||
likely begun to increase again. Given its impact as a job creator, the
|
||
trending growth or decline of this sector will be important to
|
||
monitor as well as any other medical employment centers in the
|
||
region and their impact on Richlands as a healthcare destination.
|
||
|
||
28
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
29
|
||
|
||
Figure 19: Town Employment Trends
|
||
|
||
The most noticeable decline has been in mining jobs, though it
|
||
|
||
should be noted that the numbers in both Figure 18 and 19 are for
|
||
|
||
the entire 24641 zip code that includes areas outside of Town.
|
||
|
||
Similarly, the retail sector has also declined. The impact of the
|
||
|
||
construction of a Walmart in Claypool Hill in 2000 is reflected in a
|
||
|
||
loss of retail employment within the Town. In addition to this sharp
|
||
|
||
reduction, retail jobs have steadily declined since 2000.
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing and Information are two industry sectors that do not
|
||
|
||
currently contribute a large percentage of jobs to the local economy
|
||
|
||
but could become growth opportunities in the near future. The town
|
||
|
||
has a strong transportation network of highways, rail and air con-
|
||
|
||
nections, strong telecom infrastructure, competitive utility rates
|
||
|
||
and opportunities to connect to natural gas. These assets are being
|
||
|
||
promoted in order to attract manufacturing companies to the Town.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The attraction of Information companies like those that have
|
||
|
||
located in Buchanan and Russell Counties would be a large asset to
|
||
|
||
the Town. In addition to providing jobs, these industries are also
|
||
|
||
high volume consumers of electricity, which could be provided by
|
||
|
||
the Town’s local utility.
|
||
|
||
Enterprise Zone
|
||
|
||
The Town of Richlands cooperates with Tazewell County on the
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County Enterprise Zone which includes a subarea in the
|
||
|
||
Town as shown on the following page. In addition to state incentives,
|
||
|
||
Richlands provides to qualifying business in the Enterprise Zone:
|
||
|
||
1. A declining Rehabilitated Real Estate Tax Exemption
|
||
|
||
Incentive for qualifying improvements of 80%, 60%, and
|
||
|
||
40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
200
|
||
|
||
400
|
||
|
||
600
|
||
|
||
800
|
||
|
||
1000
|
||
|
||
1200
|
||
|
||
Health care and
|
||
social assistance
|
||
|
||
Retail trade Accommodation
|
||
& food services
|
||
|
||
Mining Finance &
|
||
insurance
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing Information Professional,
|
||
scientific &
|
||
|
||
technical services
|
||
|
||
Admin, support,
|
||
waste mgt,
|
||
|
||
remediation
|
||
services
|
||
|
||
Jo
|
||
b
|
||
|
||
s
|
||
|
||
Industry Sector
|
||
|
||
1998
|
||
2000
|
||
2002
|
||
2004
|
||
2006
|
||
2008
|
||
2010
|
||
2012
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census – County Business Patterns (24641 ZIP Code)
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 19: Town Employment Trends
|
||
|
||
1200 | 1998
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
1000 = 2000
|
||
800 2002
|
||
‘oo 2004
|
||
* 2008
|
||
3 400 = 2008
|
||
200 2010
|
||
|
||
0 hn ee ee ee er
|
||
|
||
Healthcare and Retailtrade Accommodation Mining Finance & Manufacturing Information Professional, Admin, support,
|
||
social assistance & food services Insurance scientific waste met,
|
||
technical services remediation
|
||
|
||
Industry Sector
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census ~ County Business Patterns (24641 ZIP Code)
|
||
|
||
The most noticeable decline has been in mining jobs, though it
|
||
should be noted that the numbers in both Figure 18 and 19 are for
|
||
the entire 24641 zip code that includes areas outside of Town.
|
||
Similarly, the retail sector has also declined. The impact of the
|
||
construction of a Walmart in Claypool Hill in 2000 is reflected in a
|
||
loss of retail employment within the Town. In addition to this sharp
|
||
reduction, retail jobs have steadily declined since 2000.
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing and Information are two industry sectors that do not
|
||
currently contribute a large percentage of jobs to the local economy
|
||
but could become growth opportunities in the near future. The town
|
||
has a strong transportation network of highways, rail and air con-
|
||
nections, strong telecom infrastructure, competitive utility rates
|
||
and opportunities to connect to natural gas. These assets are being
|
||
order to attract manufacturing companies to the Town.
|
||
|
||
The attraction of Information companies like those that have
|
||
located in Buchanan and Russell Counties would be a large asset to
|
||
the Town. In addition to providing jobs, these industries are also
|
||
high volume consumers of electricity, which could be provided by
|
||
the Town's local utility.
|
||
|
||
Enterprise Zone
|
||
The Town of Richlands cooperates with Tazewell County on the
|
||
Tazewell County Enterprise Zone which includes a subarea in the
|
||
Town as shown on the following page. In addition to state incentives,
|
||
Richlands provides to qualifying business in the Enterprise Zone:
|
||
|
||
1. A declining Rehabilitated Real Estate Tax Exemption
|
||
Incentive for qualifying improvements of 80%, 60%, and
|
||
40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
29
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
30
|
||
|
||
2. A Building Permit and Development Fee Refund Incentive.
|
||
|
||
3. A declining Lodging Tax Refund Incentive of 80%, 60%, and
|
||
|
||
40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
4. A declining Meals Tax Refund Incentive of 80%, 60%, and
|
||
|
||
40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
5. A declining Business License Fee Abatement of 80%, 60%,
|
||
|
||
and 40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
These Enterprise Zone Incentives are new in 2016 and it is hoped
|
||
|
||
that they will help incentivize new business and industry start-ups
|
||
|
||
in the Town. There is a small trend developing where businesses in
|
||
|
||
more distressed areas of Southwest Virginia are looking to be in a
|
||
|
||
larger, more dynamic markets such as the Town of Abingdon and
|
||
|
||
Richlands. It is hope that these Incentives will also help pull some
|
||
|
||
of those relocating businesses to the Town.
|
||
|
||
Appalachian One-Stop Center
|
||
|
||
Richlands is home to Southwest Virginia’s first American Job Center
|
||
|
||
also known as One-Stop Centers, housed in the Richlands Business
|
||
|
||
Incubator facility. Established under the Workforce Investment Act
|
||
|
||
and reauthorized under the Workforce Innovation and Oppor-
|
||
|
||
tunities Act of 2014, the One-Stop Center streamlines job search
|
||
|
||
and job training efforts by offering referrals, career counseling, job
|
||
|
||
listings, and other employment-related services under one roof.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Though it still plays a central part in the local economy, the Natural
|
||
|
||
Resources & Mining sector is declining in the region. Town
|
||
|
||
employment is also declining, impacted by the loss of these mining
|
||
|
||
jobs and the loss of Retail Trade jobs that have moved to the U.S.
|
||
|
||
Route 19 Corridor. Currently the Health Care & Social Assistance
|
||
|
||
subsector, and more specifically, Clinch Valley Health, is the largest
|
||
|
||
private employer in the Town. The Manufacturing and Information
|
||
|
||
sectors may offer the strongest opportunities for growth in
|
||
|
||
Richlands due to the presence of assets needed by these industries.
|
||
|
||
Figure 20: Richlands Subarea -Tazewell County Enterprise Zone
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
Despite the decline of the coal mining industry and loss of retail jobs,
|
||
|
||
the Town boasts infrastructure assets that could support
|
||
|
||
Manufacturing, information and data driven industries. Though too
|
||
|
||
new to tell, it is very likely that the recently adopted Enterprise Zone
|
||
|
||
Incentives will pay significant dividends in the future if the Town is
|
||
|
||
able to support business start-ups and attract businesses to relocate
|
||
|
||
within the Town.
|
||
|
||
Source: Tazewell County Office of Economic Development
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
2. A Building Permit and Development Fee Refund Incentive.
|
||
|
||
3. A declining Lodging Tax Refund Incentive of 80%, 60%, and
|
||
40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
4. A declining Meals Tax Refund Incentive of 80%, 60%, and
|
||
40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
5. A declining Business License Fee Abatement of 80%, 60%,
|
||
and 40% over three years.
|
||
|
||
These Enterprise Zone Incentives are new in 2016 and it is hoped
|
||
that they will help incentivize new business and industry start-ups
|
||
in the Town. There is a small trend developing where businesses in
|
||
more distressed areas of Southwest Virginia are looking to be in a
|
||
larger, more dynamic markets such as the Town of Abingdon and
|
||
Richlands. It is hope that these Incentives will also help pull some
|
||
of those relocating businesses to the Town.
|
||
|
||
Appalachian One-Stop Center
|
||
Richlands is home to Southwest
|
||
also known as One-Stop Centers, housed in the Richlands Business
|
||
Incubator facility. Established under the Workforce Investment Act
|
||
and reauthorized under the Workforce Innovation and Oppor-
|
||
tunities Act of 2014, the One-Stop Center streamlines job search
|
||
and job training efforts by offering referrals, career counseling, job
|
||
listings, and other employment-related services under one roof.
|
||
|
||
ia’s first American Job Center
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Though it still plays a central part in the local economy, the Natural
|
||
Resources & Mining sector is declining in the region. Town
|
||
employment is also declining, impacted by the loss of these mining
|
||
jobs and the loss of Retail Trade jobs that have moved to the U.S.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Route 19 Corridor. Currently the Health Care & Social Assistance
|
||
subsector, and more specifically, Clinch Valley Health, is the largest
|
||
private employer in the Town. The Manufacturing and Information
|
||
sectors may offer the strongest opportunities for growth in
|
||
Richlands due to the presence of assets needed by these industries.
|
||
|
||
Figure 20: Richlands Subarea -Tazewell County Enterprise Zone
|
||
|
||
‘Source: Tazewell County Office of Economic Development
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
Despite the decline of the coal mining industry and loss of retail jobs,
|
||
the Town boasts infrastructure assets that could support
|
||
Manufacturing, information and data driven industries. Though too
|
||
new to tell, itis very likely that the recently adopted Enterprise Zone
|
||
Incentives will pay significant dividends in the future if the Town is
|
||
able to support business start-ups and attract businesses to relocate
|
||
within the Town.
|
||
|
||
30
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
31
|
||
|
||
2.7 COMMUNITY SERVICES, FACILITIES & UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
2.7.1 Recreation & Tourism
|
||
The Town currently has two primary recreation facilities and a
|
||
|
||
pedestrian and bike trail. A voluntary nine-member Recreation
|
||
|
||
Commission is established to “provide, conduct, and supervise” the
|
||
|
||
Town’s recreation facilities and activities. The Department of Parks
|
||
|
||
and Recreation is tasked with daily operations for its two park
|
||
|
||
facilities and recreational trail. The department focuses primarily
|
||
|
||
on providing opportunities for leisure activities for town residents.
|
||
|
||
The staff includes two full-time employees: the Executive Director
|
||
|
||
and a supervisor. Part-time employees include a facility
|
||
|
||
maintenance worker, life guards during the summer months, and
|
||
|
||
others that work year-round to provide additional services such as
|
||
|
||
coaching for local youth sports teams.
|
||
|
||
The expenses for the Department in FY 2015 was just under
|
||
|
||
$300,000. The Department is partially self-funded in that it collects
|
||
|
||
approximately $35,000 to $50,000 annually from fees and services.
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Recreation Park provides a gym, weight room, two
|
||
|
||
community rooms as well as an outdoor pool, three tennis courts, a
|
||
|
||
soccer field and a baseball/softball field. This facility, built in 1976
|
||
|
||
is currently in the midst of an extensive renovation. Phases 1 and 2
|
||
|
||
are completed and included the renovation/replacement of the
|
||
|
||
entire roof, gym floor and partitions, bleachers, and scoreboards
|
||
|
||
and upgrading of the electrical system. Phases 3 and 4 are
|
||
|
||
scheduled to begin in FY17 and include the expansion of the weight
|
||
|
||
room as well as the renovation of the restrooms.
|
||
|
||
The Williams Park Complex is located on Farmer Street, on the
|
||
|
||
southern side of the Clinch River, opposite of downtown. The
|
||
|
||
complex provides four baseball/softball fields, two basketball
|
||
|
||
courts, a picnic pavilion and playground. Funds for acquisition and
|
||
|
||
development of the park came from the Town and County, local
|
||
|
||
donations, and the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund.
|
||
|
||
The park is located in the 100-year floodplain and connects to the
|
||
|
||
Clinch River Pedestrian Walkway and Bike Trail. The trail currently
|
||
|
||
extends approximately 1,500 feet from the Williams Park Complex
|
||
|
||
and follows the Clinch River downstream and westward but ends
|
||
|
||
before reaching the Front Street Bridge. The trail was funded in part
|
||
|
||
by a Transportation Enhancement Grant of the Virginia Department
|
||
|
||
of Transportation in 2000.
|
||
|
||
An extension of the Clinch River Pedestrian Walkway and Bike Trail
|
||
|
||
has been proposed that would extend the existing trail along the
|
||
|
||
river for approximately 2 additional miles until it reached the
|
||
|
||
swinging bridge located near the intersection of Page Street and
|
||
|
||
Matney Lane. A site analysis and proposed route was completed in
|
||
|
||
the fall of 2013 with assistance from the Community Design
|
||
|
||
Assistance Center of Virginia Tech. In addition to identifying a
|
||
|
||
course, the analysis also includes recommended locations for future
|
||
|
||
public access, parks and open space along the river.
|
||
|
||
It should be noted that the users of the Town’s recreation facilities
|
||
|
||
include Tazewell County residents and residents of other nearby
|
||
|
||
towns. Town staff estimate that the ratio of in-town versus out-of-
|
||
|
||
town users to be 30% in-town and 70% out-of-town.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
2.7 COMMUNITY SERVICES, FACILITIES & UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
2.7.1 Recreation & Tourism
|
||
|
||
The Town currently has two primary recreation facilities and a
|
||
pedestrian and bike trail. A voluntary nine-member Recreation
|
||
Commission is established to “provide, conduct, and supervise” the
|
||
Town’s recreation facilities and activities. The Department of Parks
|
||
and Recreation is tasked with daily operations for its two park
|
||
facilities and recreational trail.
|
||
|
||
The department focuses primarily
|
||
on providing opportunities for leisure activities for town residents
|
||
The staff includes two full-time employees: the Executive Director
|
||
and a supervisor. Part-time employees include a facility
|
||
maintenance worker, life guards during the summer months, and
|
||
others that work year-round to provide additional services such as
|
||
coaching for local youth sports teams.
|
||
|
||
The expenses for the Department in FY 2015 was just under
|
||
$300,000. The Department is partially self-funded in that it collects
|
||
approximately $35,000 to $50,000 annually from fees and services.
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Recreation Park provides a gym, weight room, two
|
||
community rooms as well as an outdoor pool, three tennis courts, a
|
||
soccer field and a baseball/softball field. This facility, built in 1976
|
||
is currently in the midst of an extensive renovation. Phases 1 and 2
|
||
are completed and included the renovation/replacement of the
|
||
entire roof, gym floor and partitions, bleachers, and scoreboards
|
||
and upgrading of the electrical system. Phases 3 and 4 are
|
||
scheduled to begin in FY17 and include the expansion of the weight
|
||
room as well as the renovation of the restrooms.
|
||
|
||
The Williams Park Complex is located on Farmer Street, on the
|
||
southern side of the Clinch River, opposite of downtown. The
|
||
complex provides four baseball/softball fields, two basketball
|
||
courts, a picnic pavilion and playground. Funds for acquisition and
|
||
development of the park came from the Town and County, local
|
||
donations, and the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund.
|
||
|
||
The park is located in the 100-year floodplain and connects to the
|
||
Clinch River Pedestrian Walkway and Bike Trail. The trail currently
|
||
extends approximately 1,500 feet from the Williams Park Complex
|
||
and follows the Clinch River downstream and westward but ends
|
||
before reaching the Front Street Bridge. The trail was funded in part
|
||
by a Transportation Enhancement Grant of the Virginia Department
|
||
of Transportation in 2000.
|
||
|
||
‘An extension of the Clinch River Pedestrian Walkway and Bike Trail
|
||
has been proposed that would extend the existing trail along the
|
||
river for approximately 2 additional miles until it reached the
|
||
swinging bridge located near the intersection of Page Street and
|
||
Matney Lane. A site analysis and proposed route was completed in
|
||
the fall of 2013 with assistance from the Community Design
|
||
Assistance Center of Virginia Tech. In addition to identifying a
|
||
course, the analysis also includes recommended locations for future
|
||
public access, parks and open space along the river.
|
||
|
||
It should be noted that the users of the Town’s recreation facilities
|
||
include Tazewell County residents and residents of other nearby
|
||
towns. Town staff estimate that the ratio of in-town versus out-of-
|
||
town users to be 30% in-town and 70% out-of-town.
|
||
|
||
31
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
32
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
All of the Town’s existing and proposed recreational opportunities
|
||
|
||
are located along or within walking distance to the Clinch River. As
|
||
|
||
such, the river plays an important role in the quality of life of local
|
||
|
||
residents and serves as a great local asset to attract others to the
|
||
|
||
Town. Expanded access to the river also provides a high value use
|
||
|
||
for land located within the 100-year floodplain that should and
|
||
|
||
would not be developed otherwise.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
By seeking to complete its portions of the Clinch River Pedestrian
|
||
|
||
Walkway and Bike Trail and supporting the Clinch River Valley
|
||
|
||
Initiative the Town is able to serve residents and visitors by
|
||
|
||
providing recreational opportunities, making the Town a more
|
||
|
||
attractive location for business and residents looking to relocate,
|
||
|
||
and improving the environmental quality of the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, the Town is the hub of much of the region’s
|
||
|
||
recreational events. This is a real plus for the Town in that it draws
|
||
|
||
people in, but it does come at some expense.
|
||
|
||
2.7.2 Public Safety
|
||
|
||
Police
|
||
|
||
The Police Department serves the entire Town and occasionally
|
||
|
||
responds to requests for assistance from neighboring departments
|
||
|
||
through a mutual aid agreement. Average emergency response
|
||
|
||
time for 2015 was three (3) to four (4) minutes and, as such, no need
|
||
|
||
for a substation has been identified. The Department has seventeen
|
||
|
||
(17) sworn officers and currently has twenty-one (21) vehicles in its
|
||
|
||
inventory that range in age from one (1) to eleven (11) years. The
|
||
|
||
radio consoles and radio paging systems at the Police
|
||
|
||
Communications Center are severely outdated. The cost for police
|
||
|
||
protection in FY 2016 was $1.82 million.
|
||
|
||
Fire and Rescue
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department serves all areas within the Town
|
||
|
||
limits and the Western and Northwestern Districts of Tazewell
|
||
|
||
County. Made up of thirty-eight (38) full and part-time staff, the
|
||
|
||
Department has nine (9) fire trucks and other fire equipment, five
|
||
|
||
(5) ambulances, and two (2) SUV’s for the Fire and EMS Chiefs. The
|
||
|
||
strength of the staff and training, the newness of the equipment,
|
||
|
||
response times, distances traveled to a fire, and water availability
|
||
|
||
and pressure have helped the Town achieve an ISO Rating of 6, thus
|
||
|
||
helping keep insurance rates down for the community.
|
||
|
||
In 2015 (calendar year) the Department responded to 307 fire calls
|
||
|
||
and 2,486 call for emergency medical services (EMS) at a cost of just
|
||
|
||
Engine 504 in Front of Town Hall
|
||
|
||
Source: Richlands Fire & Rescue
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Al of the Town’s existing and proposed recreational opportunities
|
||
are located along or within walking distance to the Clinch River. As
|
||
such, the river plays an important role in the quality of life of local
|
||
residents and serves as a great local asset to attract others to the
|
||
Town. Expanded access to the river also provides a high value use
|
||
for land located within the 100-year floodplain that should and
|
||
‘would not be developed otherwise.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
By seeking to complete its portions of the Clinch River Pedestrian
|
||
Walkway and Bike Trail and supporting the Clinch River Valley
|
||
Initiative the Town is able to serve residents and visitors by
|
||
providing recreational opportunities, making the Town a more
|
||
attractive location for business and residents looking to relocate,
|
||
and improving the environmental quality of the Clinch River.
|
||
Additionally, the Town is the hub of much of the region’s
|
||
recreational events. This is a real plus for the Town in that it draws
|
||
people in, but it does come at some expense.
|
||
|
||
2.7.2 Public Safety
|
||
|
||
Police
|
||
|
||
The Police Department serves the entire Town and occasionally
|
||
responds to requests for assistance from neighboring departments
|
||
through a mutual aid agreement. Average emergency response
|
||
time for 2015 was three (3) to four (4) minutes and, as such, noneed
|
||
for a substation has been identified. The Department has seventeen
|
||
(17) sworn officers and currently has twenty-one (21) vehicles in its
|
||
inventory that range in age from one (1) to eleven (11) years. The
|
||
radio consoles and radio paging systems at the Police
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Communications Center are severely outdated. The cost for police
|
||
protection in FY 2016 was $1.82 million.
|
||
|
||
Fire and Rescue
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department serves all areas within the Town
|
||
limits and the Western and Northwestern Districts of Tazewell
|
||
|
||
Engine 504 in Front of Town Hall
|
||
Source: Richlands Fire & Rescue
|
||
|
||
County. Made up of thirty-eight (38) full and part-time staff, the
|
||
Department has nine (9) fire trucks and other fire equipment, five
|
||
(5) ambulances, and two (2) SUV's for the Fire and EMS Chiefs. The
|
||
strength of the staff and training, the newness of the equipment,
|
||
response times, distances traveled to a fire, and water availability
|
||
and pressure have helped the Town achieve an ISO Rating of 6, thus
|
||
helping keep insurance rates down for the community.
|
||
|
||
In 2015 (calendar year) the Department responded to 307 fire calls
|
||
and 2,486 call for emergency medical services (EMS) at a cost of just,
|
||
|
||
32
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
33
|
||
|
||
over $770,000 (fiscal year). As with the other Town services, 70% of
|
||
|
||
the fire and EMS calls are to areas outside of the Town of Richlands
|
||
|
||
in an average year. Tazewell County contributes $60,000 annually
|
||
|
||
to the Town for fire protection services and $10,500 for EMS
|
||
|
||
services.
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department also maintains a 1,730 square foot
|
||
|
||
Burn Building for the purpose of training more than 300 firefighters
|
||
|
||
from the Town of Richlands and surrounding communities.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department has successfully maintained an ISO
|
||
|
||
Public Protection Classification rating of 6 in recent years which
|
||
|
||
helps keep hazard insurance rates low for its residents and
|
||
|
||
businesses.
|
||
|
||
2.7.3 Public Works
|
||
|
||
Streets & Roads
|
||
|
||
The Streets and Roads Department is in charge of maintaining,
|
||
|
||
rehabilitating, and plowing the Town’s roadways and maintenance
|
||
|
||
and repair of storm sewers, drains, culverts and street
|
||
|
||
markings/signs in Richlands. Generally speaking, maintenance
|
||
|
||
equipment, roads, and sidewalks are not in optimal condition. The
|
||
|
||
department is in possession of snow removal equipment that is
|
||
|
||
fairly worn out, and some of the Town’s sidewalks and curbs could
|
||
|
||
greatly benefit from refurbishment. The Streets and Roads Depart-
|
||
|
||
ment operates with a staff of twelve (12) and expended just under
|
||
|
||
$920,000 in FY 2015 supported by approximately $900,000 annually
|
||
|
||
in Urban Maintenance Program funds from the Virginia Department
|
||
|
||
of Transportation.
|
||
|
||
Sanitation
|
||
|
||
The Town’s Sanitation Department is responsible for collecting and
|
||
|
||
disposing of residential garbage, household trash and bulk items. It
|
||
|
||
operates with a staff of six (6) and four (4) refuse trucks. The cost
|
||
|
||
for sanitation services in FY 2015 was just under $400,000 with just
|
||
|
||
over $407,000 collected in fees.
|
||
|
||
2.7.4 Water/Wastewater Utilities
|
||
|
||
Water
|
||
|
||
The Town owns and operates the Richlands Regional Water
|
||
|
||
Treatment Facility, a 2.5 million gallons per day (MGD) facility that
|
||
|
||
utilizes conventional methods to treat and deliver potable water to
|
||
|
||
the Town's distribution system. Partnering with the Town of Cedar
|
||
|
||
Bluff and the Tazewell County Public Service Authority, the facility
|
||
|
||
was constructed in 1994 and currently furnishes water to the Town
|
||
|
||
Richlands Fire & Rescue Department Burn Building
|
||
|
||
Source: Richlands Fire & Rescue
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
over $770,000 (fiscal year). As with the other Town services, 70% of
|
||
the fire and EMS calls are to areas outside of the Town of Richlands
|
||
in an average year. Tazewell County contributes $60,000 annually
|
||
to the Town for fire protection services and $10,500 for EMS
|
||
services.
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department also maintains a 1,730 square foot
|
||
Burn Building for the purpose of training more than 300 firefighters
|
||
from the Town of Richlands and surrounding communities.
|
||
|
||
oe
|
||
|
||
Richlands Fire & Rescue Department Burn Building
|
||
‘Source: Richlands Fire & Rescue
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department has successfully maintained an ISO
|
||
Public Protection Classification rating of 6 in recent years which
|
||
helps keep hazard insurance rates low for its residents and
|
||
businesses.
|
||
|
||
2.7.3. Public Works
|
||
|
||
Streets & Roads
|
||
|
||
The Streets and Roads Department is in charge of maintaining,
|
||
rehabilitating, and plowing the Town’s roadways and maintenance
|
||
and repair of storm sewers, drains, culverts and street
|
||
markings/signs in Richlands. Generally speaking, maintenance
|
||
equipment, roads, and sidewalks are not in optimal condition. The
|
||
department is in possession of snow removal equipment that is
|
||
fairly worn out, and some of the Town’s sidewalks and curbs could
|
||
greatly benefit from refurbishment. The Streets and Roads Depart-
|
||
ment operates with a staff of twelve (12) and expended just under
|
||
$920,000 in FY 2015 supported by approximately $900,000 annually
|
||
in Urban Maintenance Program funds from the Virginia Department
|
||
of Transportation.
|
||
|
||
Sanitation
|
||
The Town's Sanitation Department is responsible for collecting and
|
||
disposing of residential garbage, household trash and bulk items. It
|
||
operates with a staff of six (6) and four (4) refuse trucks. The cost
|
||
for sanitation services in FY 2015 was just under $400,000 with just
|
||
over $407,000 collected in fees.
|
||
|
||
2.7.4 Water/Wastewater Utilities
|
||
|
||
Water
|
||
|
||
The Town owns and operates the Richlands Regional Water
|
||
Treatment Facility, a 2.5 million gallons per day (MGD) facility that
|
||
utilizes conventional methods to treat and deliver potable water to
|
||
the Town's distribution system. Partnering with the Town of Cedar
|
||
Bluff and the Tazewell County Public Service Authority, the facility
|
||
was constructed in 1994 and currently furnishes water to the Town
|
||
|
||
33
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
34
|
||
|
||
of Cedar Bluff, the communities of Raven and Doran and other rural
|
||
|
||
areas in the Northwestern district of Tazewell County through a
|
||
|
||
contract with the Tazewell County Public Service Authority (PSA)
|
||
|
||
and portions of Russell and Buchannan Counties as a wholesale
|
||
|
||
supplier of treated water. The water treatment plant is currently
|
||
|
||
operating at about 48% capacity and serves 2,465 in-town and 77
|
||
|
||
out-of-town customers. The plant also provides water treatment
|
||
|
||
services to approximately 10,000 customers outside of the Town
|
||
|
||
through the agreements with the Tazewell County PSA and
|
||
|
||
neighboring counties.
|
||
|
||
Water distribution is accomplished through the use of booster
|
||
|
||
pumping stations and storage tanks located throughout the service
|
||
|
||
area. Water reliability is sustained through interties with other
|
||
|
||
adjacent water producers.
|
||
|
||
Wastewater
|
||
|
||
Richlands owns and operates the Richlands Regional Wastewater
|
||
|
||
Treatment Facility, a 4.0 million gallons per day (MGD) facility. The
|
||
|
||
plant, located at 425 Plant Road, treats wastewater received from
|
||
|
||
both the Town and the Tazewell County Public Service Authority's
|
||
|
||
sewage collection system. Partnering with the Town of Cedar Bluff
|
||
|
||
and the Tazewell County PSA, the facility was constructed in 1990
|
||
|
||
and currently serves the Town of Cedar Bluff and the communities
|
||
|
||
of Raven, Doran and Banes Bottom. Treated wastewater is
|
||
|
||
discharged into the Clinch River while sludge is disposed of
|
||
|
||
naturally. The wastewater treatment plant is at approximately 30%
|
||
|
||
capacity and serves 2,403 in-town and 60 out-of-town customers.
|
||
|
||
Almost all potential users in the town with access to a nearby sewer
|
||
|
||
line are connected to the system with the exception of a small
|
||
|
||
number of households on West Fork Road. The plant also provides
|
||
|
||
wastewater treatment services to approximately 10,000 customers
|
||
|
||
outside of the Town through agreement with the Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
PSA.
|
||
|
||
In FY 2015 Richlands’ operating revenue from water and sewer
|
||
|
||
utilities was $2.3 million and expenses were $2.4 million. The water
|
||
|
||
and wastewater utilities and line maintenance staff number fifteen
|
||
|
||
(15) employees.
|
||
|
||
2.7.5 Electric Utility
|
||
|
||
The Town owns and operates its own user-supported electric utility
|
||
|
||
that provides service to most residents and businesses within the
|
||
|
||
town. It purchases energy wholesale from American Municipal
|
||
|
||
Power and is able to provide electrical service at very competitive
|
||
|
||
rates. Approximately 2,500 electric customers are served by the
|
||
|
||
Town. Operating revenue for FY 2015 operating revenue matched
|
||
|
||
expenses at just over $6 million. Additionally, 500 electric customers
|
||
|
||
are served by AEP (Appalachian Power), mainly in the areas
|
||
|
||
incorporated into the Town in the 2005 Boundary Adjustment.
|
||
|
||
The Town’s power supply portfolio consists of owned asset capacity,
|
||
|
||
contracted assets, block purchases, and market purchases. The
|
||
|
||
Town owns capacity in the following generation facilities: 1) 2.588
|
||
|
||
kilowatts (kWs) in the Prairie State Energy Campus, a two unit, 1,600
|
||
|
||
megawatt (MW) mine mouth coal fired plan located in Southern
|
||
|
||
Illinois with a 30-year coal reserve on site; 2) 2,208 kWs in the
|
||
|
||
Freemont Energy Center, a 675 MW natural gas combined cycle unit
|
||
|
||
in Ohio; 3) 1,499 kWs in the Smithland, Cannelton & Willow Island
|
||
|
||
complex, a 208 MW run-of-the-river hydroelectric plant in West
|
||
|
||
Virginia; and 4) “behind the meter” generation through a 1.2 MW
|
||
|
||
generator.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
of Cedar Bluff, the communities of Raven and Doran and other rural
|
||
areas in the Northwestern district of Tazewell County through a
|
||
contract with the Tazewell County Public Service Authority (PSA)
|
||
and portions of Russell and Buchanan Counties as a wholesale
|
||
supplier of treated water. The water treatment plant is currently
|
||
operating at about 48% capacity and serves 2,465 in-town and 77
|
||
out-of-town customers. The plant also provides water treatment
|
||
services to approximately 10,000 customers outside of the Town
|
||
through the agreements with the Tazewell County PSA and
|
||
neighboring counties.
|
||
|
||
Water distribution is accomplished through the use of booster
|
||
pumping stations and storage tanks located throughout the service
|
||
area, Water reliability is sustained through interties with other
|
||
adjacent water producers.
|
||
|
||
Wastewater
|
||
Richlands owns and operates the Richlands Regional Wastewater
|
||
Treatment Facility, a 4.0 million gallons per day (MGD) facility. The
|
||
plant, located at 425 Plant Road, treats wastewater received from
|
||
both the Town and the Tazewell County Public Service Authority's
|
||
sewage collection system. Partnering with the Town of Cedar Bluff
|
||
and the Tazewell County PSA, the facility was constructed in 1990
|
||
and currently serves the Town of Cedar Bluff and the communities
|
||
of Raven, Doran and Banes Bottom. Treated wastewater is
|
||
discharged into the Clinch River while sludge is disposed of
|
||
naturally. The wastewater treatment plant is at approximately 30%
|
||
capacity and serves 2,403 in-town and 60 out-of-town customers
|
||
Almost all potential users in the town with access to a nearby sewer
|
||
line are connected to the system with the exception of a small
|
||
number of households on West Fork Road. The plant also provides
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
wastewater treatment services to approximately 10,000 customers
|
||
outside of the Town through agreement with the Tazewell County
|
||
PSA,
|
||
|
||
In FY 2015 Richlands’ operating revenue from water and sewer
|
||
utilities was $2.3 million and expenses were $2.4 million. The water
|
||
and wastewater utilities and line maintenance staff number fifteen
|
||
(15) employees.
|
||
|
||
2.7.5 Electric Utility
|
||
|
||
The Town owns and operates its own user-supported electric utility
|
||
that provides service to most residents and businesses within the
|
||
town. It purchases energy wholesale from American Municipal
|
||
Power and is able to provide electrical service at very competitive
|
||
rates. Approximately 2,500 electric customers are served by the
|
||
Town. Operating revenue for FY 2015 operating revenue matched
|
||
expenses at just over $6 million. Additionally, 500 electric customers
|
||
are served by AEP (Appalachian Power), mainly in the areas
|
||
incorporated into the Town in the 2005 Boundary Adjustment.
|
||
|
||
The Town's power supply portfolio consists of owned asset capacity,
|
||
contracted assets, block purchases, and market purchases. The
|
||
Town owns capacity in the following generation facilities: 1) 2.588
|
||
kilowatts (kWs) in the Prairie State Energy Campus, a two unit, 1,600
|
||
megawatt (MW) mine mouth coal fired plan located in Southern
|
||
Illinois with a 30-year coal reserve on site; 2) 2,208 kWs in the
|
||
Freemont Energy Center, a 675 MW natural gas combined cycle unit
|
||
in Ohio; 3) 1,499 kWs in the Smithland, Cannelton & Willow Island
|
||
complex, a 208 MW run-of-the-river hydroelectric plant in West
|
||
Virginia; and 4) “behind the meter” generation through a 1.2 MW
|
||
generator.
|
||
|
||
34
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
35
|
||
|
||
The Town has contracted assets with the Southeastern Power
|
||
|
||
Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy for hydroelectric
|
||
|
||
units in Virginia owned and controlled by the Army Corps of
|
||
|
||
Engineers. These units provide 500 kWs of the Town’s needed
|
||
|
||
capacity.
|
||
|
||
The remaining kWs needed by the Town for its customers are
|
||
|
||
provided through block purchases (contractual obligations with
|
||
|
||
utilities and energy brokers of financial institutions) and market
|
||
|
||
purchases.
|
||
|
||
The Town of Richlands is committed to seeking, evaluating, and
|
||
|
||
pursuing power supply opportunities in order to maintain service
|
||
|
||
reliability at cost competitive rates.
|
||
|
||
2.7.6 Gas Utility
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Natural Gas Distribution Company, a private utility,
|
||
|
||
currently provides natural gas to the Clinch Valley Medical Center
|
||
|
||
and the Lake Park community immediately behind it. Within (one)
|
||
|
||
1 mile of the Town of Richlands is an open-access, high capacity
|
||
|
||
Transco pipeline which could supply the Town with an unlimited
|
||
|
||
supply of natural gas produced from coal bed methane. The Town
|
||
|
||
and Appalachian Natural Gas continue exploration of a partnership
|
||
|
||
to develop a town-wide natural gas distribution system.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Public water, wastewater and electrical utilities are provided
|
||
|
||
throughout the large majority of the Town. Water and wastewater
|
||
|
||
are treated at plants that are operating at less than half of their
|
||
|
||
capacity. The Police and Fire and Rescue Departments do an
|
||
|
||
admirable job keeping Richlands citizens and citizens of surrounding
|
||
|
||
communities safe given limited resources. The Town’s public utili-
|
||
|
||
ties and services, including those provide by the Parks and
|
||
|
||
Recreation Department, get mostly high marks from its citizens per
|
||
|
||
the community survey and public input session.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
The Town has the necessary infrastructure and utility capacity in
|
||
|
||
place to support efforts at bringing in much needed additional
|
||
|
||
employers. This infrastructure and capacity can also handle
|
||
|
||
additional businesses and households, both within the Town if
|
||
|
||
internal growth was to occur and outside the Town if a future
|
||
|
||
boundary adjustment was to occur. As with any utility that has
|
||
|
||
additional unused capacity, additional users would go far to help
|
||
|
||
cover the costs of providing the utility in real time and over time as
|
||
|
||
operational costs and the cost of ongoing capital improvements to
|
||
|
||
the system climb.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
The Town has contracted assets with the Southeastern Power
|
||
Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy for hydroelectric
|
||
Units in Virginia owned and controlled by the Army Corps of
|
||
Engineers. These units provide 500 kWs of the Town's needed
|
||
capacity.
|
||
|
||
The remaining kWs needed by the Town for its customers are
|
||
provided through block purchases (contractual obligations with
|
||
utilities and energy brokers of financial institutions) and market
|
||
purchases.
|
||
|
||
The Town of Richlands is committed to seeking, evaluating, and
|
||
pursuing power supply opportunities in order to maintain service
|
||
reliability at cost competitive rates.
|
||
|
||
2.7.6 Gas Utility
|
||
|
||
Appalachian Natural Gas Distribution Company, a private utility,
|
||
currently provides natural gas to the Clinch Valley Medical Center
|
||
and the Lake Park community immediately behind it. Within (one)
|
||
1 mile of the Town of Richlands is an open-access, high capacity
|
||
Transco pipeline which could supply the Town with an unlimited
|
||
supply of natural gas produced from coal bed methane. The Town
|
||
and Appalachian Natural Gas continue exploration of a partnership
|
||
to develop a town-wide natural gas distribution system
|
||
|
||
‘summary
|
||
|
||
Public water, wastewater and electrical utilities are provided
|
||
throughout the large majority of the Town. Water and wastewater
|
||
are treated at plants that are operating at less than half of their
|
||
capacity. The Police and Fire and Rescue Departments do an
|
||
admirable job keeping Richlands citizens and citizens of surrounding
|
||
communities safe given limited resources. The Town’s public utili-
|
||
|
||
ties and services, including those provide by the Parks and
|
||
Recreation Department, get mostly high marks from its citizens per
|
||
the community survey and public input session.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
The Town has the necessary infrastructure and utility capacity in
|
||
place to support efforts at bringing in much needed additional
|
||
employers. This infrastructure and capacity can also handle
|
||
additional businesses and households, both within the Town if
|
||
internal growth was to occur and outside the Town if a future
|
||
boundary adjustment was to occur. As with any utility that has
|
||
additional unused capacity, additional users would go far to help
|
||
cover the costs of providing the utility in real time and over time as
|
||
operational costs and the cost of ongoing capital improvements to
|
||
the system climb.
|
||
|
||
35
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
36
|
||
|
||
2.8 TRANSPORTATION
|
||
|
||
2.8.1 Roadway Functional Classifications
|
||
|
||
The Town’s road network includes routes classified by VDOT as
|
||
|
||
principal or minor arterials and major or minor collectors. These
|
||
|
||
classifications denote the kind of function each roadway serves.
|
||
|
||
Arterials are intended to emphasize mobility, the efficiency by
|
||
|
||
which traffic can move. Collectors are intended to emphasize
|
||
|
||
access, connecting different uses along the route. Each functional
|
||
|
||
classification exists on a scale between providing efficient mobility
|
||
|
||
and access via points of entry and exit. The VDOT Functional
|
||
|
||
Classifications are represented graphically in Figure 21 to the right
|
||
|
||
and on a VDOT Functional Classifications Map that follows page 38.
|
||
|
||
U.S. Route 460 Bypass and Business are the primary arteries in
|
||
|
||
Richlands. 460 is part of the Heartland Corridor, a designated
|
||
|
||
Corridor of Statewide Significance. A major function of the corridor
|
||
|
||
is to transport freight from the coalfields to Hampton Roads. In
|
||
|
||
addition to moving freight towards the east coast, Route 460 also
|
||
|
||
connects the coalfields to markets in the Midwest. The segment of
|
||
|
||
Route 460 parallel to the railroad and adjacent to the Clinch Valley
|
||
|
||
Medical Center is typically the most congested stretch of road in the
|
||
|
||
area. Mobility along Route 460 is a high priority and as such, access
|
||
|
||
points are tightly managed, especially along this segment.
|
||
|
||
2.8.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes
|
||
|
||
Traffic volume data from 2014 shows the Town’s busiest roadways.
|
||
|
||
The Route 460 Bypass carries the largest loads, particularly at the
|
||
|
||
eastern and western Town boundaries. A reduction in total traffic
|
||
|
||
volume on the Route 460 Bypass between the intersection with Front
|
||
|
||
Street and the exit onto Railroad Street demonstrates that these two
|
||
|
||
Figure 21: VDOT Functional Classifications in Richlands
|
||
|
||
points are the most frequently used entrance and exit in and out of
|
||
|
||
downtown. Route 460 Business where 2nd Street merges with Front
|
||
|
||
Street is the busiest non-Bypass segment. There are several access
|
||
|
||
points along this segment including fast food and convenience uses
|
||
|
||
that create a tension between road mobility and access. To
|
||
|
||
accommodate the high traffic volumes and increase accessibility,
|
||
|
||
this segment has been identified for road widening and two-way left
|
||
|
||
turn lanes. (An Average Annual Daily Traffic Map follows page 38.)
|
||
|
||
Principal
|
||
Arterial
|
||
|
||
• Route 460 - Governor George C Perry Highway
|
||
|
||
Minor
|
||
Arterial
|
||
|
||
• Business 460 - Front Street and Second Street
|
||
|
||
• Route 67, (South of Rt. 460) - Railroad Street
|
||
|
||
• Route 67 - Raven Road
|
||
|
||
Major
|
||
Collector
|
||
|
||
• Route 67, (North of Rt. 460) - Railroad Street
|
||
|
||
• Route 609 - Kent Ridge Road and Veteran Drive
|
||
|
||
Minor
|
||
Collector
|
||
|
||
• Norfolk Street
|
||
|
||
• Edgewater Drive
|
||
|
||
H
|
||
igh
|
||
|
||
er M
|
||
o
|
||
|
||
b
|
||
ility
|
||
|
||
H
|
||
igh
|
||
|
||
er A
|
||
ccess
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
2.8 TRANSPORTATION
|
||
|
||
2.8.1 Roadway Functional Classifications
|
||
The Town’s road network includes routes classified by VDOT as
|
||
principal or minor arterials and major or minor collectors. These
|
||
classifications denote the kind of function each roadway serves.
|
||
Arterials are intended to emphasize mobility, the efficiency by
|
||
which traffic can move. Collectors are intended to emphasize
|
||
access, connecting different uses along the route. Each functional
|
||
classification exists on a scale between providing efficient mobility
|
||
and access via points of entry and exit. The VDOT Functional
|
||
Classifications are represented graphically in Figure 21 to the right
|
||
and on a VDOT Functional Classifications Map that follows page 38.
|
||
|
||
U.S. Route 460 Bypass and Business are the primary arteries in
|
||
Richlands. 460 is part of the Heartland Corridor, a designated
|
||
Corridor of Statewide Significance. A major function of the corridor
|
||
is to transport freight from the coalfields to Hampton Roads. In
|
||
addition to moving freight towards the east coast, Route 460 also
|
||
connects the coalfields to markets in the Midwest. The segment of
|
||
Route 460 parallel to the railroad and adjacent to the Clinch Valley
|
||
Medical Center is typically the most congested stretch of road in the
|
||
area. Mobility along Route 460 is a high priority and as such, access
|
||
points are tightly managed, especially along this segment.
|
||
|
||
2.8.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes
|
||
|
||
Traffic volume data from 2014 shows the Town’s busiest roadways.
|
||
The Route 460 Bypass carries the largest loads, particularly at the
|
||
eastern and western Town boundaries. A reduction in total traffic
|
||
volume on the Route 460 Bypass between the intersection with Front
|
||
Street and the exit onto Railroad Street demonstrates that these two
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 21: VDOT Functional Classifications in Richlands
|
||
|
||
+ Route 460 - Governor George C Perry Highway
|
||
Principal
|
||
Arterial
|
||
|
||
* Business 460 - Front Street and Second Street
|
||
‘+ Route 67, (South of Rt. 460) - Railroad Street
|
||
|
||
Minor |. Route 67 - Rav
|
||
inet, | + Route 67- Raven Road
|
||
|
||
+ Route 67, (North of Rt. 460) - Railroad Street
|
||
Major | * Route 609 - Kent Ridge Road and Veteran Drive
|
||
Collector
|
||
|
||
IH
|
||
|
||
3004 19
|
||
|
||
+ Norfolk Street
|
||
Minor | * Edgewater Drive
|
||
Collector
|
||
|
||
points are the most frequently used entrance and exit in and out of
|
||
downtown. Route 460 Business where 2" Street merges with Front
|
||
Street is the busiest non-Bypass segment. There are several access
|
||
points along this segment including fast food and convenience uses
|
||
that create a tension between road mobility and access. To
|
||
accommodate the high traffic volumes and increase accessibility,
|
||
this segment has been identified for road widening and two-way left
|
||
turn lanes, (An Average Annual Daily Traffic Map follows page 38.)
|
||
|
||
36
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
37
|
||
|
||
2.8.3 Alternative Transportation Options
|
||
In addition to local and regional roads, Richlands’ transportation
|
||
|
||
network includes railroads for freight and a local bus system
|
||
|
||
operated by Four County Transit. Sidewalks are available in most
|
||
|
||
commercial areas of town, in a few of the older residential
|
||
|
||
neighborhoods and along some major roads. The town has no
|
||
|
||
designated bike lanes and, perhaps due to topography, biking is not
|
||
|
||
a widely used means of transportation.
|
||
|
||
Figure 22: Means of Transportation to Work 2009-2013
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Estimate
|
||
|
||
Margin
|
||
of Error
|
||
|
||
Workers 16 years and over 2,044 +/-192
|
||
|
||
Car, truck, or van 94% +/-4.4
|
||
|
||
Drove alone 87% +/-5.1
|
||
|
||
Carpooled 7% +/-3.4
|
||
|
||
In 2-person carpool 5% +/-3.1
|
||
|
||
In 3-person carpool 2% +/-1.2
|
||
|
||
In 4-or-more person carpool 0% +/-1.7
|
||
|
||
Workers per car, truck, or van 104% +/-0.02
|
||
|
||
Public transportation (excluding taxicab) 0% +/-1.7
|
||
|
||
Walked 2% +/-1.6
|
||
|
||
Bicycle 0% +/-1.7
|
||
|
||
Taxicab, motorcycle, or other means 1% +/-0.8
|
||
|
||
Worked at home 3% +/-3.5
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2009-2013 Estimates
|
||
|
||
As noted in Figure 22, private vehicles are the most common means
|
||
|
||
of transportation to work. The sample size of the U.S. Census
|
||
|
||
Bureau’s American Community Survey means that the margin of
|
||
|
||
error is especially large for the underutilized means of
|
||
|
||
transportation. Despite the lack of precision, the findings
|
||
|
||
demonstrate that there are currently very few workers in Richlands
|
||
|
||
that are using modes of transportation other than personal
|
||
|
||
automobile when commuting to work.
|
||
|
||
Walking and Biking
|
||
|
||
The commercial district and neighborhoods surrounding Richlands
|
||
|
||
Town Hall as well as the entire lengths of 2nd Street and Front Street
|
||
|
||
are well lined with sidewalks. Front Street from downtown to the
|
||
|
||
school complex provides a key connection along a heavily trafficked
|
||
|
||
road. In other areas sidewalks are less available. The Alternate
|
||
|
||
Transportation Options map that follows page 38 identifies key
|
||
|
||
sidewalk extensions needed along busy roads that could serve to
|
||
|
||
connect residential
|
||
|
||
areas with jobs and
|
||
|
||
retail and service
|
||
|
||
centers.
|
||
|
||
There are currently
|
||
|
||
no bike lanes in
|
||
|
||
Richlands. Per the
|
||
|
||
data to the left, bike
|
||
|
||
ridership is very low
|
||
|
||
in Richlands. If bike
|
||
|
||
usage increases,
|
||
|
||
especially on busy
|
||
|
||
roads with narrow or
|
||
A Bike Sharrow
|
||
|
||
Source: Flickr.com, Michael Andersen
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
2.8.3 Alternative Transportation Options
|
||
In addition to local and regional roads, Richlands’ transportation
|
||
network includes railroads for freight and a local bus system
|
||
operated by Four County Transit. Sidewalks are available in most
|
||
commercial areas of town, in a few of the older residential
|
||
neighborhoods and along some major roads. The town has no
|
||
designated bike lanes and, perhaps due to topography, biking is not
|
||
a widely used means of transportation.
|
||
|
||
Figure 22: Means of Transportation to Work 2009-2013
|
||
Margin
|
||
Estimate of Error
|
||
Workers 16 years and over 2088 +/-192
|
||
Car, truck, or van 94% 4
|
||
Drove alone 8% +/5a
|
||
Carpooled 7% 4/34
|
||
In 2-person carpool 5% 4/34
|
||
In 3-person carpool 2% 4/42
|
||
In 4-or-more person carpool om a7
|
||
Workers per car, truck, or van 108% —_+/-0.02
|
||
Public transportation (excluding taxicab) om sear
|
||
Walked 2% 4/46
|
||
Bicycle o% afar
|
||
Taxicab, motorcycle or other means 1% 4/08
|
||
Worked at home ae as
|
||
|
||
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2009-2013 Estimates
|
||
|
||
As noted in Figure 22, private vehicles are the most common means
|
||
of transportation to work. The sample size of the U.S. Census
|
||
Bureau's American Community Survey means that the margin of
|
||
error is especially large for the underutilized means of
|
||
transportation. Despite the lack of precision, the findings
|
||
demonstrate that there are currently very few workers in Richlands
|
||
that are using modes of transportation other than personal
|
||
automobile when commuting to work.
|
||
|
||
Walking and Biking
|
||
The commercial di
|
||
|
||
rict and neighborhoods surrounding Richlands
|
||
Town Hall as well as the entire lengths of 2” Street and Front Street
|
||
are well lined with sidewalks. Front Street from downtown to the
|
||
school complex provides a key connection along a heavily trafficked
|
||
road. In other areas sidewalks are less available. The Alternate
|
||
Transportation Options map that follows page 38 identifies key
|
||
sidewalk extensions needed along busy roads that could serve to.
|
||
connect residential
|
||
areas with jobs and
|
||
retail and service
|
||
centers.
|
||
|
||
There are currently
|
||
no bil lanes in
|
||
Richlands. Per the
|
||
data to the left, bike
|
||
ridership is very low
|
||
in Richlands. If bike
|
||
usage _increases,
|
||
especially on busy
|
||
roads with narrow or
|
||
|
||
ABike Sharrow
|
||
‘Source: Flickr.com, Michael Andersen
|
||
|
||
37
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
38
|
||
|
||
no shoulders, bike “sharrows” can be installed to signal to drivers
|
||
|
||
that they must be alert and share the road with bicyclists.
|
||
|
||
Public Transit
|
||
|
||
The bus service provided by Four County Transit is deviated fixed
|
||
|
||
route service throughout the Town and connecting to the region.
|
||
|
||
The Town contributes $7,200 annually to Four County Transit in
|
||
|
||
support of its citizens’ usage of the system. The Alternative
|
||
|
||
Transportation Options Map shows the current fixed routes within
|
||
|
||
the Town and a route that connects Richlands residents to retail
|
||
|
||
destinations in Claypool Hill and Pounding Mill.
|
||
|
||
Figure 23: Total Bus Trips per Year
|
||
|
||
Fiscal Year
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Route
|
||
Pounding Mill
|
||
|
||
Connector
|
||
|
||
2010-2011 15,008 *4,141
|
||
|
||
2011-2012 15,672 7,635
|
||
|
||
2012-2013 14,949 8,532
|
||
|
||
2013-2014 16,294 9,750
|
||
|
||
2014-2015 11,935 10,648
|
||
|
||
Source: Four County Transit * Route began in November 2010
|
||
|
||
As demonstrated in Figure 23, ridership levels for the Richlands
|
||
|
||
Route have remained relatively constant until FY 2014-2015 when
|
||
|
||
total number of trips on the Richlands Route fell by 27%. Part of this
|
||
|
||
reduction may be due to the fact that some bus stops along the
|
||
|
||
Richlands Route were moved to the Pounding Mill Connector in that
|
||
|
||
year. Even accounting for this change, total ridership between the
|
||
|
||
two routes dropped in FY 2014-2015. Ridership levels for the
|
||
|
||
Pounding Mill Connector have risen steadily since service began in
|
||
|
||
2010.
|
||
|
||
Rail
|
||
|
||
Many of Norfolk Southern’s freight rail lines which run through
|
||
|
||
Virginia’s coalfields converge in Richlands and connect to wider
|
||
|
||
markets on the east coast and Midwest. In 2010, Norfolk Southern
|
||
|
||
completed improvements that increased freight capacity on the
|
||
|
||
Heartland Corridor, which runs from the Port of Virginia in Hampton
|
||
|
||
Roads to markets in the Midwest. The corridor’s mainline does not
|
||
|
||
pass through the Town, but it is easily accessible from Norfolk
|
||
|
||
Southern’s network of rail lines that do enter the Town. Amtrak’s
|
||
|
||
passenger rail corridors in Virginia do not provide access to
|
||
|
||
Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
|
||
Richlands’ transportation network is very robust, but does not
|
||
|
||
adequately promote and support walking and bicycling as
|
||
|
||
alternative means of transportation. However, constructing and
|
||
|
||
maintaining additional pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure
|
||
|
||
would be challenging given the ongoing expense of maintaining the
|
||
|
||
road network that is already in place. Road maintenance costs will
|
||
|
||
be significant in future years and the support and regular and special
|
||
|
||
funding provided by the Virginia Transportation Department is
|
||
|
||
crucial to the future success of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
Richlands needs to continue working with its local, regional, and
|
||
|
||
state partners, both public and private, to ensure that resources are
|
||
|
||
made available to keep the Town well-connected to national and
|
||
|
||
international markets via a modern transportation network.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
no shoulders, bike “sharrows” can be installed to signal to drivers
|
||
that they must be alert and share the road with bicyclists.
|
||
|
||
Public Transit
|
||
|
||
The bus service provided by Four County Transit is deviated fixed
|
||
route service throughout the Town and connecting to the region.
|
||
The Town contributes $7,200 annually to Four County Transit in
|
||
support of its citizens’ usage of the system. The Alternative
|
||
Transportation Options Map shows the current fixed routes within
|
||
the Town and a route that connects Richlands residents to retail
|
||
destinations in Claypool Hill and Pounding Mil.
|
||
|
||
Figure 23: Total Bus Trips per Year
|
||
|
||
Richlands Pounding Mill
|
||
cal Year Route Connector
|
||
2010-2011, 415,008 sai
|
||
2011-2012 15,672 7835
|
||
2012-2013, 14,949 8532
|
||
2013-2018 16,294 9,750
|
||
20142015, 11,935 10,648
|
||
|
||
‘Source: Four County Transit. * Route began in November 2010
|
||
|
||
‘As demonstrated in Figure 23, ridership levels for the Richlands
|
||
Route have remained relatively constant until FY 2014-2015 when
|
||
total number of trips on the Richlands Route fell by 27%. Part of this
|
||
reduction may be due to the fact that some bus stops along the
|
||
Richlands Route were moved to the Pounding Mill Connector in that
|
||
year. Even accounting for this change, total ridership between the
|
||
two routes dropped in FY 2014-2015. Ridership levels for the
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Pounding Mill Connector have risen steadily since service began in
|
||
2010.
|
||
|
||
Rail
|
||
|
||
Many of Norfolk Southern’s freight rail lines which run through
|
||
Virginia’s coalfields converge in Richlands and connect to wider
|
||
markets on the east coast and Midwest. In 2010, Norfolk Southern
|
||
completed improvements that increased freight capacity on the
|
||
Heartland Corridor, which runs from the Port of Virginia in Hampton
|
||
Roads to markets in the Midwest. The corridor’s mainline does not
|
||
pass through the Town, but it is easily accessible from Norfolk
|
||
Southern’s network of rail lines that do enter the Town. Amtrak's
|
||
passenger rail corridors in Virginia do not provide access to
|
||
Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Summary
|
||
Richlands’ transportation network is very robust, but does not
|
||
adequately promote and support walking and bicycling as
|
||
alternative means of transportation. However, constructing and
|
||
maintaining additional pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure
|
||
would be challenging given the ongoing expense of maintaining the
|
||
road network that is already in place. Road maintenance costs will
|
||
be significant in future years and the support and regular and special
|
||
funding provided by the Virginia Transportation Department is
|
||
crucial to the future success of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Key Takeaway
|
||
|
||
Richlands needs to continue working with its local, regional, and
|
||
state partners, both public and private, to ensure that resources are
|
||
made available to keep the Town well-connected to national and
|
||
international markets via a modern transportation network.
|
||
|
||
38
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
VDOT FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS.
|
||
|
||
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STUDY
|
||
‘own oF RIcHLANDS, ViRINIA f
|
||
|
||
sens rocnown catarcanons
|
||
a cmerrencrnamnense
|
||
|
||
eo tenon
|
||
GOP ascconsey
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC
|
||
|
||
‘COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STUDY
|
||
|
||
cee ame
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION obi 4
|
||
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STUDY t
|
||
‘OF RICHLANDS, VIRGINIA f \ Xi
|
||
|
||
9 ar sie
|
||
|
||
FICHLANDS 79 POUNDING LL
|
||
“Teanrt ROUTE NET
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
39
|
||
|
||
3 THE PLAN
|
||
|
||
3.1 VISION
|
||
|
||
One of the most compelling themes to emerge from this
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Planning process is that even with its challenges,
|
||
|
||
the Town of Richlands is better poised than many towns in
|
||
|
||
Southwest Virginia to take advantage of the shifts in the regional
|
||
|
||
economy. It sits at a hub for both the regional highway and rail
|
||
|
||
transportation networks. It is home to a large regional hospital. It
|
||
|
||
is a more developed locality with levels of public services often
|
||
|
||
reserved for much larger communities. It is located well to take
|
||
|
||
advantage of the growth in natural gas exploration and extraction.
|
||
|
||
From this opportunity emerges a vision statement:
|
||
|
||
Building on our rich history, ideal location, & “can do”
|
||
|
||
attitude, Richlands will strive to be a premier
|
||
|
||
community in Southwest Virginia.
|
||
|
||
This vision statement serves as a challenge to the Town of Richlands
|
||
|
||
and as a reminder that it has what it takes to grow and advance in
|
||
|
||
the future. It is an aspirational statement, intentionally short on
|
||
|
||
details. The details come in the remainder of the Plan component
|
||
|
||
that follows.
|
||
|
||
3.2 PLAN STRUCTURE
|
||
|
||
Beyond the vision, the Plan component of a Comprehensive Plan
|
||
|
||
can take on many forms and formats including a vision statement; a
|
||
|
||
list of goals, objectives, and strategies; a list of policy initiatives;
|
||
|
||
illustrative plans and conceptual drawings of particular public
|
||
|
||
improvements or areas targeted for transformation; and/or a list of
|
||
|
||
capital improvements needed to move the locality forward. At a
|
||
|
||
minimum and as required by the Code of Virginia, it must include a
|
||
|
||
generalized land use plan that encourages an orderly, harmonious
|
||
|
||
arrangement of land that will meet the present and future needs of
|
||
|
||
the locality. This is typically done through a Future Land Use Map
|
||
|
||
that represents the vision the locality has for the development
|
||
|
||
and/or redevelopment of the land within its boundaries.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, in Virginia, a Comprehensive Plan must contain a
|
||
|
||
transportation plan that lines up with regional and statewide road
|
||
|
||
planning efforts and funding priorities as promulgated by the
|
||
|
||
Virginia Department of Transportation.
|
||
|
||
The remainder of the Plan has been structured with a combination
|
||
|
||
of forms/formats. Sub-sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 that follow are set
|
||
|
||
up as goals, objectives, and strategies that line out broad directions
|
||
|
||
and specific strategies that need to be undertaken to move the
|
||
|
||
Town of Richlands forward in the areas of land use and
|
||
|
||
development, housing and neighborhoods, and economic
|
||
|
||
development. For the most part, the strategies outlined in these
|
||
|
||
sub-sections are not very capital intensive or depend on the infusion
|
||
|
||
of outside capital via grants available through the Commonwealth
|
||
|
||
of Virginia. They are also strategies that take a number of years to
|
||
|
||
fully implement or are implemented in distinct stages. Sub-
|
||
|
||
section 3.2 also contains the Future Land Use Map as referenced
|
||
|
||
above.
|
||
|
||
Sub-section 3.5 addresses the capital needs related to community
|
||
|
||
services, facilities, and utilities and is set up as a longer-term Capital
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
3 THE PLAN
|
||
|
||
3.1 VISION
|
||
|
||
One of the most compelling themes to emerge from this
|
||
Comprehensive Planning process is that even with its challenges,
|
||
the Town of Richlands is better poised than many towns in
|
||
Southwest Virginia to take advantage of the shifts in the regional
|
||
economy. It sits at a hub for both the regional highway and rail
|
||
transportation networks. It is home to a large regional hospital. It
|
||
is a more developed locality with levels of public services often
|
||
reserved for much larger communities. It is located well to take
|
||
advantage of the growth in natural gas exploration and extraction,
|
||
|
||
From this opportunity emerges a vision statement:
|
||
|
||
Building on our rich history, ideal location, & “can do”
|
||
attitude, Richlands will strive to be a premier
|
||
community in Southwest Virginia.
|
||
|
||
This vision statement serves as a challenge to the Town of Richlands
|
||
and as a reminder that it has what it takes to grow and advance in
|
||
the future. It is an aspirational statement, intentionally short on
|
||
details. The details come in the remainder of the Plan component
|
||
that follows.
|
||
|
||
3.2 PLAN STRUCTURE
|
||
|
||
Beyond the vision, the Plan component of a Comprehensive Plan
|
||
can take on many forms and formats including a vision statement; a
|
||
|
||
list of goals, objectives, and strategies; a list of policy initiatives;
|
||
illustrative plans and conceptual drawings of particular public
|
||
improvements or areas targeted for transformation; and/or a list of
|
||
capital improvements needed to move the locality forward. At a
|
||
minimum and as required by the Code of Virginia, it must include a
|
||
generalized land use plan that encourages an orderly, harmonious
|
||
arrangement of land that will meet the present and future needs of
|
||
the locality. This is typically done through a Future Land Use Map
|
||
that represents the vision the locality has for the development
|
||
and/or redevelopment of the land within its boundaries.
|
||
Additionally, in Virginia, a Comprehensive Plan must contain a
|
||
transportation plan that lines up with regional and statewide road
|
||
planning efforts and funding priorities as promulgated by the
|
||
Virginia Department of Transportation.
|
||
|
||
The remainder of the Plan has been structured with a combination
|
||
of forms/formats. Sub-sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 that follow are set
|
||
up as goals, objectives, and strategies that line out broad directions
|
||
and specific strategies that need to be undertaken to move the
|
||
Town of Richlands forward in the areas of land use and
|
||
development, housing and neighborhoods, and economic
|
||
development. For the most part, the strategies outlined in these
|
||
sub-sections are not very capital intensive or depend on the infusion
|
||
of outside capital via grants available through the Commonwealth
|
||
of Virginia. They are also strategies that take a number of years to
|
||
fully implement or are implemented in distinct stages. Sub-
|
||
section 3.2 also contains the Future Land Use Map as referenced
|
||
above,
|
||
|
||
Sub-section 3.5 addresses the capital needs related to community
|
||
services, facilities, and utilities and is set up as a longer-term Capital
|
||
|
||
39
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
40
|
||
|
||
Improvement Plan (CIP) that provides guidance to the annual CIP
|
||
|
||
planning process in future years. It also sets forth goals, objectives,
|
||
|
||
and strategies to increase the sustainability and resiliency of the
|
||
|
||
Town in light of the challenging financial atmosphere Richlands finds
|
||
|
||
itself in these days.
|
||
|
||
Sub-section 3.6 outlines the transportation projects previously
|
||
|
||
identified by the Town and regional leaders as priorities and
|
||
|
||
provides additional information about a shift in funding priorities for
|
||
|
||
the Virginia Department of Transportation. Because this shift is still
|
||
|
||
a work in progress, this Comprehensive Plan can highlight its
|
||
|
||
potential impact, but can not fully line up project needs and funding
|
||
|
||
opportunities at this time. Therefore, this sub-section also includes
|
||
|
||
a set of goals, objectives, and strategies aimed at developing more
|
||
|
||
concrete transportation plans in the near future.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Improvement Plan (CIP) that provides guidance to the annual CIP
|
||
planning process in future years. It also sets forth goals, objectives,
|
||
and strategies to increase the sustainability and resiliency of the
|
||
Town in light of the challenging financial atmosphere Richlands finds
|
||
itself in these days.
|
||
|
||
Sub-section 3.6 outlines the transportation projects previously
|
||
identified by the Town and regional leaders as priorities and
|
||
provides additional information about a shift in funding priorities for
|
||
the Virginia Department of Transportation. Because this shiftis still
|
||
a work in progress, this Comprehensive Plan can highlight its
|
||
potential impact, but can not fully line up project needs and funding
|
||
opportunities at this time. Therefore, this sub-section also includes
|
||
a set of goals, objectives, and strategies aimed at developing more
|
||
concrete transportation plans in the near future,
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
40
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
41
|
||
|
||
3.3 LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT
|
||
|
||
As a community located in an economically challenged region of
|
||
|
||
Virginia, Richlands has to walk a fine line of having land use and
|
||
|
||
development guidelines and regulations that are both specific
|
||
|
||
enough to guide development and flexible enough to not scare
|
||
|
||
away new development. In Southwest Virginia competition is keen
|
||
|
||
for the limited amount of growth that comes to the region in any
|
||
|
||
given year. When it becomes too burdensome to undertake a
|
||
|
||
project in one locality, a developer can move just down the road to
|
||
|
||
where the development atmosphere is friendlier, either in a nearby
|
||
|
||
town or in an unincorporated portion of Tazewell County or some
|
||
|
||
other nearby county.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies do more closely
|
||
|
||
regulate the development environment in Richlands. At the same
|
||
|
||
time, they also include provisions that if implemented would
|
||
|
||
incentivize development and redevelopment in Richlands. An
|
||
|
||
example of an incentive is the Real Estate Property Tax Partial
|
||
|
||
Exemption for improvements to older structures. Even delineating
|
||
|
||
more clearly the zoning districts and uses is in itself an incentive to
|
||
|
||
build a new house or develop a new business where you know there
|
||
|
||
will not be incompatible uses or ongoing nuisances in close
|
||
|
||
proximity to each other.
|
||
|
||
Goal: To spur the development of vacant land and the
|
||
|
||
redevelopment of underutilized parcels and dilapidated structures
|
||
|
||
by implementing forward-looking land use and development
|
||
|
||
policies, ordinances, and strategies.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the amount of vacant land and
|
||
|
||
existing retail, commercial, and industrial buildings being
|
||
|
||
actively marketed.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A decrease in the number of underutilized parcels
|
||
|
||
and dilapidated structures.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the annual number of issued Building
|
||
|
||
Permits as a measure of development/redevelopment activity.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An expansion of the Town’s boundary as warranted
|
||
|
||
by a continued shift of development to nearby unincorporated
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County lands and concurrent loss of business and
|
||
|
||
industry in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Utilize the Future Land Use Map included in
|
||
|
||
this Comprehensive Plan as a platform for making
|
||
|
||
additional future land use designations in order to improve
|
||
|
||
the Town’s existing land use patterns and to encourage and
|
||
|
||
accommodate new development.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Update and upgrade the Town Zoning
|
||
|
||
Ordinance and Zoning Map to provide stronger guidance to
|
||
|
||
the proper development of land and structures including
|
||
|
||
the elimination of split zoning and the creation of new
|
||
|
||
zoning categories/districts such as Mixed Use.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Additionally update and upgrade the Town
|
||
|
||
Zoning Ordinance to allow for targeted economic
|
||
|
||
development and redevelopment projects to be sited via
|
||
|
||
one or more new “floating” zones similar to the typical
|
||
|
||
Planned Unit Development floating zone utilized by many
|
||
|
||
communities today. Such floating zones might be of three
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
3.3 LAND Use & DEVELOPMENT
|
||
|
||
‘As a community located in an economically challenged region of
|
||
Virginia, Richlands has to walk a fine line of having land use and
|
||
development guidelines and regulations that are both specific
|
||
enough to guide development and flexible enough to not scare
|
||
away new development. In Southwest Virginia competition is keen
|
||
for the limited amount of growth that comes to the region in any
|
||
given year. When it becomes too burdensome to undertake a
|
||
project in one locality, a developer can move just down the road to
|
||
where the development atmosphere is friendlier, either in a nearby
|
||
town or in an unincorporated portion of Tazewell County or some
|
||
other nearby county.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies do more closely
|
||
regulate the development environment in Richlands. At the same
|
||
, they also include provisions that if implemented would
|
||
incentivize development and redevelopment in Richlands. An
|
||
example of an incentive is the Real Estate Property Tax Partial
|
||
Exemption for improvements to older structures. Even delineating
|
||
more clearly the zoning districts and uses is in itself an incentive to
|
||
build a new house or develop a new business where you know there
|
||
will not be incompatible uses or ongoing nuisances in close
|
||
proximity to each other.
|
||
|
||
Goal: To spur the development of vacant land and the
|
||
redevelopment of underutilized parcels and dilapidated structures
|
||
by implementing forward-looking land use and development
|
||
policies, ordinances, and strategies.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the amount of vacant land and
|
||
existing retail, commercial, and industrial buildings being
|
||
actively marketed.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A decrease in the number of underutilized parcels
|
||
|
||
and dilapidated structures.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the annual number of issued Building
|
||
Permits as a measure of development/redevelopment activity.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An expansion of the Town's boundary as warranted
|
||
by a continued shift of development to nearby unincorporated
|
||
Tazewell County lands and concurrent loss of business and
|
||
industry in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Utilize the Future Land Use Map included in
|
||
this Comprehensive Plan as a platform for making
|
||
additional future land use designations in order to improve
|
||
the Town’s existing land use patterns and to encourage and
|
||
accommodate new development.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Update and upgrade the Town Zoning
|
||
Ordinance and Zoning Map to provide stronger guidance to
|
||
the proper development of land and structures including
|
||
the elimination of split zoning and the creation of new
|
||
zoning categories/districts such as Mixed Use.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Additionally update and upgrade the Town
|
||
Zoning Ordinance to allow for targeted economic
|
||
development and redevelopment projects to be sited via
|
||
fone or more new “floating” zones similar to the typical
|
||
Planned Unit Development floating zone utilized by many
|
||
communities today. Such floating zones might be of three
|
||
|
||
a1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
42
|
||
|
||
types: Economic Development, Mixed Use, and Mixed
|
||
|
||
Residential.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Adopt and implement a Real Estate Property
|
||
|
||
Tax Partial Exemption Ordinance for improvements to older
|
||
|
||
structures [100% exemption of increase in assessment or
|
||
|
||
50% of actual cost of improvements phased out over a
|
||
|
||
period of up to 15 years (as allowed under the Code of
|
||
|
||
Virginia, § 58.1-3220)].
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: Adopt and implement a Land Use Assessment
|
||
|
||
Ordinance to allow for reduced property assessments for
|
||
|
||
land in agricultural, horticultural, forestal, or open-space
|
||
|
||
use (as allowed under the Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3230ff).
|
||
|
||
Strategy #6: Undertake a boundary adjustment study to
|
||
|
||
determine the feasibility and efficacy of pursuing a future
|
||
|
||
boundary adjustment with Tazewell County.
|
||
|
||
Because of the amount of land constrained by environmental
|
||
|
||
factors (floodplain and steep slopes) [see Environmental Constraints
|
||
|
||
map], the Future Land Use Map that follows this page does contain
|
||
|
||
future land use designations indicating the extent to which currently
|
||
|
||
vacant parcels can be developed. Those designations include:
|
||
|
||
Constrained – parcels where approximately 75% or more of
|
||
|
||
the land is in the floodplain or contains steep slopes.
|
||
|
||
Mixed Constrained/Developable – parcels where approx-
|
||
|
||
imately 25% to 75% of the land is in the floodplain or
|
||
|
||
contains steep slopes.
|
||
|
||
Developable – parcels where approximately 25% or less of
|
||
|
||
the land is in the floodplain or contains steep slopes.
|
||
|
||
An additional factor in determining the uses outlined above was the
|
||
|
||
isolation of certain parcels due to their distance from a public road
|
||
|
||
or their location behind an already developed parcel.
|
||
|
||
The Future Land Use map that follows this page is hereby
|
||
|
||
established as the Land Use Plan for the Town of Richlands. It may
|
||
|
||
be amended from time to time through action of the Town of
|
||
|
||
Richlands Planning Commission and subsequently approved by
|
||
|
||
Town Council or by alterations made under a future comprehensive
|
||
|
||
plan for the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
types: Economic Development, Mixed Use, and Mixed
|
||
Residential.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Adopt and implement a Real Estate Property
|
||
Tax Partial Exemption Ordinance for improvements to older
|
||
structures [100% exemption of increase in assessment or
|
||
50% of actual cost of improvements phased out over a
|
||
period of up to 15 years (as allowed under the Code of
|
||
Virginia, § 58.1-3220)].
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: Adopt and implement a Land Use Assessment
|
||
Ordinance to allow for reduced property assessments for
|
||
land in agricultural, horticultural, forestal, or open-space
|
||
use (as allowed under the Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3230f).
|
||
|
||
Strategy #6: Undertake a boundary adjustment study to
|
||
determine the feasibility and efficacy of pursuing a future
|
||
boundary adjustment with Tazewell County.
|
||
|
||
Because of the amount of land constrained by environmental
|
||
factors (floodplain and steep slopes) [see Environmental Constraints
|
||
map], the Future Land Use Map that follows this page does contain
|
||
future land use designations indicating the extent to which currently
|
||
vacant parcels can be developed. Those designations include:
|
||
|
||
* Constrained — parcels where approximately 75% or more of
|
||
the land is in the floodplain or contains steep slopes.
|
||
|
||
‘* Mixed Constrained/Developable — parcels where approx-
|
||
imately 25% to 75% of the land is in the floodplain or
|
||
contains steep slopes.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
‘* Developable ~ parcels where approximately 25% or less of
|
||
the land is in the floodplain or contains steep slopes.
|
||
|
||
‘An additional factor in determining the uses outlined above was the
|
||
isolation of certain parcels due to their distance from a pul
|
||
or their location behind an already developed parcel.
|
||
|
||
road
|
||
|
||
The Future Land Use map that follows this page is hereby
|
||
established as the Land Use Plan for the Town of Richlands. It may
|
||
be amended from time to time through action of the Town of
|
||
Richlands Planning Commission and subsequently approved by
|
||
Town Council or by alterations made under a future comprehensive
|
||
plan for the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
42
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
FUTURE LAND USE
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
43
|
||
|
||
3.4 HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOODS
|
||
|
||
Even though Richlands’ population is projected to stay relatively flat
|
||
|
||
in future years, new and rehabilitated housing will still be needed as
|
||
|
||
the housing stock continues to age. Additionally, additional housing
|
||
|
||
types achieved through new construction will be needed to
|
||
|
||
maintain a healthy mix of ages within the Town limits, particularly
|
||
|
||
for young families and the elderly. The following goal, objectives,
|
||
|
||
and strategies are established to address these issues and to
|
||
|
||
hopefully position the Town for growth in the future as the local
|
||
|
||
economy continues to adjust to the decline in coal mining in the
|
||
|
||
region.
|
||
|
||
Goal: To provide a strong mix of housing options by promoting the
|
||
|
||
rehabilitation of existing housing and the development of new
|
||
|
||
housing for persons of varying income levels, household size, and
|
||
|
||
stages of life.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A decrease in the number of households living in
|
||
|
||
substandard housing in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the annual number of major housing
|
||
|
||
rehabilitations and additions in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the annual number of new housing
|
||
|
||
starts in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: The development of additional housing types in the
|
||
|
||
Town of Richlands including townhomes, upscale apartments,
|
||
|
||
senior apartments, well-built affordable housing units, and new
|
||
|
||
or rehabbed small units for millennials.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Secure a Planning Grant from the Virginia
|
||
|
||
Department of Housing and Community Development
|
||
|
||
(VDHCD) to conduct a town-wide Housing Needs
|
||
|
||
Assessment that prioritizes neighborhoods for housing
|
||
|
||
rehabilitation and identifies new housing development
|
||
|
||
opportunities.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Secure a second Planning Grant from VDHCD
|
||
|
||
to plan, apply for, and if awarded implementation funding,
|
||
|
||
undertake a specific Community Development Block Grant
|
||
|
||
(CDBG)-funded housing rehabilitation project in a targeted
|
||
|
||
neighborhood of high need.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Work with a recognized and capable non-
|
||
|
||
profit community development corporation to determine
|
||
|
||
the opportunities for the development of additional low-
|
||
|
||
and moderate-income housing communities with the
|
||
|
||
assistance of various grants such as the Virginia Housing
|
||
|
||
Trust Fund and various incentives such as the Low-Income
|
||
|
||
Housing Tax Credit program.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Secure grant funding from the Virginia
|
||
|
||
Housing Development Authority a Mixed Use-Mixed Income
|
||
|
||
(MUMI) Planning Grant to study the feasibility of adaptively
|
||
|
||
reusing one or more downtown structures as a mixed use
|
||
|
||
(residential rental/retail) facility.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: In cooperation with local realtors, develop
|
||
|
||
and maintain a section of the Town of Richland’s website as
|
||
|
||
a means of promoting “housing opportunities available in
|
||
|
||
Richlands” that promotes housing ready for occupancy,
|
||
|
||
“fixer-uppers,” and land available for residential
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
3.4 HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOODS
|
||
|
||
Even though Richlands’ population is projected to stay relatively flat
|
||
in future years, new and rehabilitated housing will still be needed as
|
||
the housing stock continues to age. Additionally, additional housing
|
||
types achieved through new construction will be needed to
|
||
maintain a healthy mix of ages within the Town limits, particularly
|
||
for young families and the elderly. The following goal, objectives,
|
||
and strategies are established to address these issues and to
|
||
hopefully position the Town for growth in the future as the local
|
||
economy co!
|
||
region.
|
||
|
||
lues to adjust to the decline in coal mining in the
|
||
|
||
Goal: To provide a strong mix of housing options by promoting the
|
||
rehabilitation of existing housing and the development of new
|
||
housing for persons of varying income levels, household size, and
|
||
stages of life.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A decrease in the number of households living in
|
||
substandard housing in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the annual number of major housing
|
||
rehabilitations and additions in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in the annual number of new housing
|
||
starts in the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: The development of additional housing types in the
|
||
‘Town of Richlands including townhomes, upscale apartments,
|
||
senior apartments, well-built affordable housing units, and new
|
||
or rehabbed small units for millennials.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Secure a Planning Grant from the Virginia
|
||
Department of Housing and Community Development
|
||
(VDHCD) to conduct a town-wide Housing Needs
|
||
Assessment that prioritizes neighborhoods for housing
|
||
rehabilitation and identifies new housing development
|
||
opportunities.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Secure a second Planning Grant from VDHCD
|
||
to plan, apply for, and if awarded implementation funding,
|
||
undertake a specific Community Development Block Grant
|
||
(CDBG)-funded housing rehabilitation project in a targeted
|
||
neighborhood of high need.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Work with a recognized and capable non-
|
||
profit community development corporation to determine
|
||
the opportunities for the development of additional low-
|
||
and moderate-income housing communities with the
|
||
assistance of various grants such as the Virginia Housing
|
||
Trust Fund and various incentives such as the Low-Income
|
||
Housing Tax Credit program.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Secure grant funding from the Virginia
|
||
Housing Development Authority a Mixed Use-Mixed Income
|
||
(MUMI) Planning Grant to study the feasibility of adaptively
|
||
reusing one or more downtown structures as a mixed use
|
||
(residential rental/retail) facility.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: In cooperation with local realtors, develop
|
||
and maintain a section of the Town of Richland’s website as
|
||
a means of promoting “housing opportunities available in
|
||
Richlands” that promotes housing ready for occupancy,
|
||
“fixer-uppers,” and land available for residential
|
||
|
||
43
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
44
|
||
|
||
development. This strategy should have multiple target
|
||
|
||
markets including young families and persons who grew up
|
||
|
||
in Southwest Virginia that are seeking to return to the area
|
||
|
||
in their retirement years.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
development. This strategy should have multiple target
|
||
markets including young families and persons who grew up
|
||
in Southwest Virginia that are seeking to return to the area
|
||
in their retirement years.
|
||
|
||
44
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
45
|
||
|
||
3.5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
|
||
In our modern world, local economies are more connected to and
|
||
|
||
impacted by regional, state, national, and international economies
|
||
|
||
than ever before. Because of this, local economic development
|
||
|
||
efforts can never be undertaken in isolation. Securing resources,
|
||
|
||
both private and public, and expertise from outside of the
|
||
|
||
immediate community is key to building a strong local economy.
|
||
|
||
This is even more true as localities seek to land larger companies
|
||
|
||
and develop basic industries that bring new wealth into the
|
||
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
At the same time, there has been a burst of entrepreneurial
|
||
|
||
development in America in recent years, particularly among
|
||
|
||
younger people. Much of this new entrepreneurial development
|
||
|
||
has occurred in the larger cities which serve as magnets, pulling Gen
|
||
|
||
Xers and Millenials away from rural and small town communities.
|
||
|
||
Countering this trend through supporting entrepreneurial
|
||
|
||
development in non-urban settings is a very challenging, but
|
||
|
||
essential part of developing the local economy. Such support also
|
||
|
||
provides the benefit of helping keep at least some of the younger
|
||
|
||
residents of the community at home instead of watching them all
|
||
|
||
migrate to the big cities.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies keep these two trends
|
||
|
||
in mind.
|
||
|
||
Goal: To expand economic opportunities for the citizens of
|
||
|
||
Richlands by encouraging and supporting the development of new
|
||
|
||
retail, commercial, office, tourism, and industrial enterprises within
|
||
|
||
the Town of Richlands and on its doorstep through regional
|
||
|
||
economic development partnerships.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in employment and a commensurate
|
||
|
||
decrease in unemployment and underemployment within the
|
||
|
||
Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A pattern of growth in median household income in
|
||
|
||
the Town of Richlands in excess of the rate of inflation.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Secure a Planning Grant from VDHCD to plan,
|
||
|
||
apply for, and if awarded implementation funding,
|
||
|
||
undertake a specific Community Development Block Grant
|
||
|
||
(CDBG)-funded downtown revitalization project for the
|
||
|
||
section of Downtown Richlands west of the Clinch River
|
||
|
||
along 2nd Street and Front Street.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Continue to develop natural gas as a town-
|
||
|
||
wide utility and explore at the appropriate stage of
|
||
|
||
development the efficacy and feasibility of a stronger Town
|
||
|
||
role in expanding the delivery of natural gas to residential,
|
||
|
||
retail, office, commercial, and industrial users.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: In cooperation with the Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
Office of Economic Development and the Virginia Economic
|
||
|
||
Development Partnership, actively promote the Town of
|
||
|
||
Richland’s Enterprise Zone and other key economic
|
||
|
||
development opportunities to regional, statewide, and
|
||
|
||
national markets.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: In cooperation with the Tazewell County
|
||
|
||
Tourism Department and Clinch River Valley Initiative,
|
||
|
||
actively promote the historic and cultural assets in
|
||
|
||
Downtown Richlands including the Coal Miner’s Memorial,
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
3.5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
|
||
|
||
In our modern world, local economies are more connected to and
|
||
impacted by regional, state, national, and international economies
|
||
than ever before. Because of this, local economic development
|
||
efforts can never be undertaken in isolation. Securing resources,
|
||
both private and public, and expertise from outside of the
|
||
immediate community is key to building a strong local economy.
|
||
This is even more true as localities seek to land larger companies
|
||
and develop basic industries that bring new wealth into the
|
||
community.
|
||
|
||
‘At the same time, there has been a burst of entrepreneurial
|
||
development in America in recent years, particularly among
|
||
younger people. Much of this new entrepreneurial development
|
||
has occurred in the larger cities which serve as magnets, pulling Gen
|
||
Xers and Millenials away from rural and small town communities.
|
||
Countering this trend through supporting entrepreneurial
|
||
development in non-urban settings is a very challenging, but
|
||
essential part of developing the local economy. Such support also
|
||
provides the benefit of helping keep at least some of the younger
|
||
residents of the community at home instead of watching them all
|
||
migrate to the big cities.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies keep these two trends
|
||
in mind.
|
||
|
||
Goal: To expand economic opportunities for the citizens of
|
||
Richlands by encouraging and supporting the development of new
|
||
retail, commercial, office, tourism, and industrial enterprises withit
|
||
|
||
the Town of Richlands and on its doorstep through regional
|
||
economic development partnerships.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An increase in employment and a commensurate
|
||
decrease in unemployment and underemployment within the
|
||
Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A pattern of growth in median household income in
|
||
the Town of Richlands in excess of the rate of inflation.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Secure a Planning Grant from VDHCD to plan,
|
||
apply for, and if awarded implementation funding,
|
||
undertake a specific Community Development Block Grant
|
||
(CDBG)-funded downtown revitalization project for the
|
||
section of Downtown Richlands west of the Clinch River
|
||
along 2” Street and Front Street.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Continue to develop natural gas as a town-
|
||
wide utility and explore at the appropriate stage of
|
||
development the efficacy and feasibility of a stronger Town
|
||
role in expanding the delivery of natural gas to residential,
|
||
retail, office, commercial, and industrial users.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: In cooperation with the Tazewell County
|
||
Office of Economic Development and the Virginia Economic
|
||
Development Partnership, actively promote the Town of
|
||
Richland’s Enterprise Zone and other key economic
|
||
development opportunities to regional, statewide, and
|
||
national markets,
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: In cooperation with the Tazewell County
|
||
Tourism Department and Clinch River Valley Initiative,
|
||
actively promote the historic and cultural assets in
|
||
Downtown Richlands including the Coal Miner’s Memorial,
|
||
|
||
45
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
46
|
||
|
||
Section House, Clinch River access, downtown businesses
|
||
|
||
and architecture, and the downtown murals.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: In cooperation with the Small Business
|
||
|
||
Development Center at Southwest Virginia Community
|
||
|
||
College, the Tazewell County Economic Development
|
||
|
||
Department, and the Appalachian One Stop Workforce
|
||
|
||
Center create an Entrepreneur “Boot Camp” and pursue all
|
||
|
||
funding opportunities of support for the program and its
|
||
|
||
graduates such as the Virginia Department of Housing and
|
||
|
||
Economic Development’s “Building Entrepreneurial
|
||
|
||
Economies” grant funding.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #6: In cooperation with the Richlands Area
|
||
|
||
Chamber of Commerce, host a twice yearly forum of
|
||
|
||
realtors, developers, and business leaders within the Town
|
||
|
||
of Richlands to keep them abreast of developments within
|
||
|
||
the Town, solicit their input, and gain their commitment as
|
||
|
||
promoters of the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #7: Develop and maintain a section of the Town
|
||
|
||
of Richland’s website as a means of promoting “economic
|
||
|
||
opportunities available in Richlands.”
|
||
|
||
Strategy #8: Maintain an awareness of the state resources
|
||
|
||
available for economic development and where
|
||
|
||
opportunity arises, vigorously pursue all state funding
|
||
|
||
available for economic development projects.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #9: Prioritize the participation of key Town staff
|
||
|
||
and elected officials in regional and statewide economic
|
||
|
||
development forums, training events, and promotional
|
||
|
||
events.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Section House, Clinch River access, downtown businesses
|
||
and architecture, and the downtown murals.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: In cooperation with the Small Business
|
||
Development Center at Southwest Virginia Community
|
||
College, the Tazewell County Economic Development
|
||
Department, and the Appalachian One Stop Workforce
|
||
Center create an Entrepreneur “Boot Camp” and pursue all
|
||
funding opportunities of support for the program and its
|
||
graduates such as the Virginia Department of Housing and
|
||
Economic Development's “Building Entrepreneurial
|
||
Economies” grant funding.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #6: In cooperation the Richlands Area
|
||
Chamber of Commerce, host a twice yearly forum of
|
||
realtors, developers, and business leaders within the Town
|
||
of Richlands to keep them abreast of developments within
|
||
the Town, solicit their input, and gain their commitment as
|
||
promoters of the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #7: Develop and maintain a section of the Town
|
||
of Richland’s website as a means of promoting “economic
|
||
opportunities available in Richlands.”
|
||
|
||
Strategy #8: Maintain an awareness of the state resources
|
||
available for economic development and where
|
||
opportunity arises, vigorously pursue all state funding
|
||
available for economic development projects.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #9: Prioritize the participation of key Town staff
|
||
and elected officials in regional and statewide economic
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
development forums, training events, and promotional
|
||
events.
|
||
|
||
46
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
47
|
||
|
||
3.6 COMMUNITY SERVICES, FACILITIES & UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
The following information is set up as a longer-term Capital
|
||
|
||
Improvement Plan (CIP) that provides guidance to the annual CIP
|
||
|
||
planning process in future years. The costs cited represent the best
|
||
|
||
estimate of the various department heads for the Town of
|
||
|
||
Richlands.
|
||
|
||
3.6.1 Public Safety
|
||
|
||
Police
|
||
|
||
The Police Department is funded mainly through the General Fund,
|
||
|
||
but also receives categorical aid/grants from the Commonwealth of
|
||
|
||
Virginia and to a lesser degree, fines and asset forfeitures. The
|
||
|
||
Department identified two primary capital needs: upgraded
|
||
|
||
technology and replacement of its vehicle fleet. Costs for these
|
||
|
||
investments have been programmed through 2021.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-a: Police Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$64,000 $178,500 $190,500 $128,000 $138,000 $699,000
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Fire and Rescue
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department is funded through the General
|
||
|
||
Fund and categorical aid/grants from the Commonwealth of
|
||
|
||
Virginia, but also receives funding from Rescue Squad fees of
|
||
|
||
$550,000 to $600,000 annually. Upcoming capital expenses include
|
||
|
||
a new Fire/EMS building estimated at $4.2 million. Additionally, the
|
||
|
||
Department has identified the need for a new ladder truck. The cost
|
||
|
||
of a new truck is estimated at $1.2 million, but it can also be
|
||
|
||
purchased used for $300,000.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-b: Fire Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
|
||
|
||
$0 $650,000 $1,550,000 $30,000 $0
|
||
|
||
2022 Total
|
||
|
||
$4,265,000 $6,465,000
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Capital needs for the Rescue Squad are related to expanding
|
||
|
||
capacity. The need for two new trucks and new staff hires have also
|
||
|
||
been identified.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-c: Rescue Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$171,840 $22,000 $13,000 $160,000 $25,000 $391,840
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3.6.2 Water/Wastewater Utilities
|
||
|
||
Water Treatment
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Regional Water Treatment Facility is in good
|
||
|
||
condition and operates under capacity. Nevertheless, regularly
|
||
|
||
scheduled maintenance and improvements needed to keep up with
|
||
|
||
current standards are having a growing impact on the Water Utility
|
||
|
||
budget. Repair/painting costs for the Airport tank that is a part of
|
||
|
||
the water treatment plant are estimated at $250,000.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
3.6 COMMUNITY SERVICES, FACILITIES & UTILITIES
|
||
|
||
The following information is set up as a longer-term Capital
|
||
Improvement Plan (CIP) that provides guidance to the annual CIP
|
||
planning process in future years. The costs cited represent the best
|
||
estimate of the various department heads for the Town of
|
||
Richlands.
|
||
|
||
3.6.1 Public Safety
|
||
|
||
Police
|
||
|
||
The Police Department is funded mainly through the General Fund,
|
||
but also receives categorical aid/grants from the Commonwealth of
|
||
Virginia and to a lesser degree, fines and asset forfeitures. The
|
||
Department identified two primary capital needs: upgraded
|
||
technology and replacement of its vehicle fleet. Costs for these
|
||
investments have been programmed through 2021.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-a: Police Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$64,000 | $178,500 | $190,500 | $128,000 | $138,000 | $699,000
|
||
|
||
Fire and Rescue
|
||
|
||
The Fire and Rescue Department is funded through the General
|
||
Fund and categorical aid/grants from the Commonwealth of
|
||
Virginia, but also receives funding from Rescue Squad fees of
|
||
$550,000 to $600,000 annually. Upcoming capital expenses include
|
||
a new Fire/EMS building estimated at $4.2 million. Additionally, the
|
||
Department has identified the need for a new ladder truck. The cost
|
||
|
||
of a new truck is estimated at $1.2 million, but it can also be
|
||
purchased used for $300,000.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-b: Fire Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019_| 2020 2021
|
||
|
||
$650,000 | $1,550,000 | $30,000
|
||
2022 Total
|
||
|
||
$4,265,000 | $6,465,000
|
||
|
||
Capital needs for the Rescue Squad are related to expanding
|
||
capacity. The need for two new trucks and new staff hires have also
|
||
been identified.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-c: Rescue Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$171,840 | $22,000 | $13,000 | $160,000 | $25,000 _| $391,840
|
||
|
||
3.6.2 Water/Wastewater Utilities
|
||
|
||
Water Treatment
|
||
|
||
The Richlands Regional Water Treatment Facility is in good
|
||
condition and operates under capacity. Nevertheless, regularly
|
||
scheduled maintenance and improvements needed to keep up with
|
||
current standards are having a growing impact on the Water Utility
|
||
budget. Repair/painting costs for the Airport tank that is a part of,
|
||
the water treatment plant are estimated at $250,000.
|
||
|
||
47
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
48
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-d: Water Treatment Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$334,750 $37,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $371,750
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Wastewater Treatment
|
||
|
||
Projected capital costs are identified through 2019 and are primarily
|
||
|
||
focused on the maintenance of the existing system. The largest
|
||
|
||
upcoming capital needs are a dump truck for bio-solids ($85,000)
|
||
|
||
and an upgrade for the plant’s ultra-violet (UV) disinfection system
|
||
|
||
($250,000).
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-e: Wastewater Treatment Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$167,650 $435,000 $5,000 $30,000 $0 $637,750
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Water/Wastewater Lines
|
||
|
||
Included in the projected capital costs below is a sewer line
|
||
|
||
extension along West Fork Road, a water line extension to the Hill
|
||
|
||
Creek area, and a water line extension on Sagewood Drive off of
|
||
|
||
Route 629 (Daw Road). These extensions are programmed to be
|
||
|
||
accomplished through 2022. The largest expense, however, is line
|
||
|
||
replacement and enlargement on Clinch and Patterson Streets
|
||
|
||
($100,000). Further extension of water and sewer lines within Town
|
||
|
||
boundaries is limited because of topographical constraints.
|
||
|
||
Repair costs for the Farmer tank are estimated at $150,000. A long-
|
||
|
||
term solution needs to be identified for the School tank. The tank
|
||
|
||
will need to be repaired or, if replaced, the Downtown tank could
|
||
|
||
be moved and consolidated with a new School tank.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-f: Water/Wastewater Line Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$230,800 $65,000 $70,000 $100,000 $40,000 $505,800
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3.6.3 Streets and Roads
|
||
|
||
The largest capital expense on an ongoing basis for the Streets and
|
||
|
||
Road Department is repaving of existing roads. Additional capital
|
||
|
||
expenses include equipment purchases, such as a new street
|
||
|
||
sweeper scheduled for FY2019 at $75,000 and other facilities, such
|
||
|
||
as a new salt building scheduled for $250,000 in FY2019.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-g: Streets Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$540,000 $40,000 $755,000 $27,500 $80,000 $1,442,500
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3.6.4 Sanitation
|
||
|
||
The largest capital expense for the Sanitation Department is the
|
||
|
||
replacement of garbage trucks and other equipment. A grapple
|
||
|
||
truck is scheduled for FY2019 at $125,000 and a new garbage truck
|
||
|
||
is scheduled for FY2020 for $150,000.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-h: Sanitation Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$0 $0 $125,000 $150,000 $0 $275,000
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-d: Water Treatment Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-f: Water/Wastewater Line Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
$334,750 | $37,000 | $25,000 $0 so_| $371,750 $230,800 | $65,000 | $70,000 | $100,000 | $40,000 _| $505,800
|
||
Wastewater Treatment
|
||
|
||
Projected capital costs are identified through 2019 and are primarily
|
||
focused on the maintenance of the existing system. The largest
|
||
upcoming capital needs are a dump truck for bio-solids ($85,000)
|
||
and an upgrade for the plant’s ultra-violet (UV) disinfection system
|
||
($250,000).
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-e: Wastewater Treatment Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 | 2018 2019 2020 2021 | Total
|
||
$167,650 | $435,000 | $5,000 | $30,000 $0_| $637,750
|
||
|
||
Water/Wastewater Lines
|
||
|
||
Included in the projected capital costs below is a sewer line
|
||
extension along West Fork Road, a water line extension to the Hill
|
||
Creek area, and a water line extension on Sagewood Drive off of
|
||
Route 629 (Daw Road). These extensions are programmed to be
|
||
accomplished through 2022. The largest expense, however, is line
|
||
replacement and enlargement on Clinch and Patterson Streets
|
||
($100,000). Further extension of water and sewer lines within Town
|
||
boundaries
|
||
|
||
limited because of topographical constraints.
|
||
|
||
Repair costs for the Farmer tank are estimated at $150,000. Along-
|
||
term solution needs to be identified for the School tank. The tank
|
||
will need to be repaired or, if replaced, the Downtown tank could
|
||
|
||
3.6.3 Streets and Roads
|
||
|
||
The largest capital expense on an ongoing basis for the Streets and
|
||
Road Department is repaving of existing roads. Additional capital
|
||
expenses include equipment purchases, such as a new street
|
||
sweeper scheduled for FY2019 at $75,000 and other facilities, such
|
||
as a new salt building scheduled for $250,000 in FY2019.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-g: Streets Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 __2020__2021 Total
|
||
$540,000 | $40,000 _| $755,000 | $27,500 | $80,000 | $1,442,500
|
||
|
||
3.6.4 Sanitation
|
||
|
||
The largest capital expense for the Sanitation Department is the
|
||
replacement of garbage trucks and other equipment. A grapple
|
||
truck is scheduled for FY2019 at $125,000 and a new garbage truck
|
||
is scheduled for FY2020 for $150,000.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-h: Sanitation Projected Capital Costs
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
so $0 | $125,000 | $150,000 0 | $275,000
|
||
|
||
48
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
49
|
||
|
||
3.6.5 Electric Utility
|
||
|
||
The cost of smaller capital improvements to the Electric Utility can
|
||
|
||
be funded with minimal adjustments to the electric utility fees
|
||
|
||
charged to the customers of the system. Larger and unanticipated
|
||
|
||
capital costs that may be encountered in the future would likely
|
||
|
||
require much larger adjustments in these fees. If the Electric Utility
|
||
|
||
were able to expand to take in those AEP customers that remain
|
||
|
||
within the Town’s boundary from the previous boundary
|
||
|
||
adjustment or through a new boundary adjustment, these costs
|
||
|
||
could be spread out over a larger customer base. However, AEP
|
||
|
||
assets or any other electric company assets would have to be
|
||
|
||
acquired at significant cost. This would be a difficult and expensive
|
||
|
||
proposition and not necessarily included as part of any negotiated
|
||
|
||
boundary adjustment since the assets are privately held.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-i: Electrical Utility Projected Capital Costs.
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
|
||
$45,750 $106,000 $0 $0 $0 $151,750
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The total of all the capital expenses outlined above and on the
|
||
|
||
previous two pages is $10.3 million over the next five (5) to six (6)
|
||
|
||
years, or approximately $1.75 to $2.1 million per year. While not
|
||
|
||
large by some standards, this amount can represent a challenge for
|
||
|
||
a smaller community like the Town of Richlands. Additionally,
|
||
|
||
having sufficient capital funds on hand is very important in that
|
||
|
||
more and more of the funding agencies require matching funds to
|
||
|
||
access their grant funds
|
||
|
||
The Town handles many of its capital expenses on a “pay as you go”
|
||
|
||
basis through its Capital Improvement Plan, but an expense such as
|
||
|
||
a new Fire/EMS Building requires taking on new debt. Every year,
|
||
|
||
the budgeting processes for the General Fund, Utilities, and Capital
|
||
|
||
Improvement Budgets are quite challenging. Town leadership
|
||
|
||
anticipates that budgeting will be an ongoing challenge, short of
|
||
|
||
having a large amount of new residential, commercial, or industrial
|
||
|
||
growth come to the Town.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies are offered as a means
|
||
|
||
of putting the Town of Richlands on better footing to handle the
|
||
|
||
current and future capital needs and expenditures, as well as
|
||
|
||
smooth out any ups and downs in General Fund revenue and
|
||
|
||
expenses that might be encountered.
|
||
|
||
Goal: To raise and set aside the operational and capital resources
|
||
|
||
needed to undergird the growth and development of the Town of
|
||
|
||
Richlands as a premier Southwest Virginia Community.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An improvement in the sustainability and resilience
|
||
|
||
of the Town of Richlands to weather the continuing shift in the
|
||
|
||
Southwest Virginia regional economy, any future regional and
|
||
|
||
economic downturns, man-made and natural disasters, and
|
||
|
||
other unanticipated events.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A better and smoother transition to any increases
|
||
|
||
in taxes and/or fees that might become necessary to continue
|
||
|
||
functioning as a well-tuned local government.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Regularly develop a more robust Capital
|
||
|
||
Improvement Plan that anticipates annual and five-year
|
||
|
||
capital needs and expenditures and outlines sources of
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
3.6.5 Electric Utility
|
||
|
||
The cost of smaller capital improvements to the Electric Utility can
|
||
be funded with minimal adjustments to the electric utility fees
|
||
charged to the customers of the system. Larger and unanticipated
|
||
capital costs that may be encountered in the future would
|
||
require much larger adjustments in these fees. If the Electric U
|
||
were able to expand to take in those AEP customers that remain
|
||
within the Town’s boundary from the previous boundary
|
||
adjustment or through a new boundary adjustment, these costs
|
||
could be spread out over a larger customer base. However, AEP
|
||
assets or any other electric company assets would have to be
|
||
acquired at significant cost. This would be a difficult and expensive
|
||
proposition and not necessarily included as part of any negotiated
|
||
boundary adjustment since the assets are privately held.
|
||
|
||
Figure 24-i: Electrical Utility Projected Capital Costs.
|
||
|
||
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
|
||
$45,750 _| $106,000 $0 $0 so | $151,750
|
||
|
||
The total of all the capital expenses outlined above and on the
|
||
previous two pages is $10.3 million over the next five (5) to six (6)
|
||
years, or approximately $1.75 to $2.1 million per year. While not
|
||
large by some standards, this amount can represent a challenge for
|
||
a smaller community like the Town of Richlands. Additionally,
|
||
having sufficient capital funds on hand is very important in that
|
||
more and more of the funding agencies require matching funds to
|
||
access their grant funds
|
||
|
||
The Town handles many of its capital expenses on a “pay as you go”
|
||
basis through its Capital Improvement Plan, but an expense such as
|
||
a new Fire/EMS Building requires taking on new debt. Every year,
|
||
the budgeting processes for the General Fund, Utilities, and Capital
|
||
Improvement Budgets are quite challenging. Town leadership
|
||
anticipates that budgeting will be an ongoing challenge, short of
|
||
having a large amount of new residential, commercial, or industrial
|
||
growth come to the Town.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies are offered as a means
|
||
of putting the Town of Richlands on better footing to handle the
|
||
current and future capital needs and expenditures, as well as
|
||
smooth out any ups and downs in General Fund revenue and
|
||
expenses that might be encountered.
|
||
|
||
Goal: To raise and set aside the operational and capital resources
|
||
needed to undergird the growth and development of the Town of
|
||
Richlands as a premier Southwest Virginia Community.
|
||
|
||
Objective: An improvement in the sustainability and resilience
|
||
of the Town of Richlands to weather the continuing shift in the
|
||
Southwest Virginia regional economy, any future regional and
|
||
economic downturns, man-made and natural disasters, and
|
||
other unanticipated events.
|
||
|
||
Objecti
|
||
in taxes and/or fees that might become necessary to continue
|
||
functioning as a well-tuned local government.
|
||
|
||
A better and smoother transition to any increases
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Regularly develop a more robust Capital
|
||
Improvement Plan that anticipates annual and five-year
|
||
capital needs and expenditures and outlines sources of
|
||
|
||
49
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
50
|
||
|
||
funding for each expenditure (General Funds, any
|
||
|
||
applicable state and federal grants, partnering entities,
|
||
|
||
private donations, etc.).
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Determine on a five-year basis an annual
|
||
|
||
General Fund allocation to be set aside to fund the Capital
|
||
|
||
Improvement Plan and adjust revenues and/or other
|
||
|
||
expenditures to provide the funding needed.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Create a “rainy day” General Fund reserve and
|
||
|
||
a “rainy day” Capital Improvement reserve to be funded at
|
||
|
||
percentages of the annual General Fund Budget and Capital
|
||
|
||
Improvement Budget set by the Town Council and fund
|
||
|
||
them from any revenue over expenses on an annual basis
|
||
|
||
until the percentages are met.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Undertake a boundary adjustment study to
|
||
|
||
determine the feasibility and efficacy of pursuing a future
|
||
|
||
boundary adjustment with Tazewell County. (Repeated
|
||
|
||
from page 41.)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
funding for each expenditure (General Funds, any
|
||
applicable state and federal grants, partnering entities,
|
||
private donations, etc.),
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Determine on a five-year basis an annual
|
||
General Fund allocation to be set aside to fund the Capital
|
||
Improvement Plan and adjust revenues and/or other
|
||
expenditures to provide the funding needed.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Create a “rainy day” General Fund reserve and
|
||
a “rainy day” Capital Improvement reserve to be funded at
|
||
percentages of the annual General Fund Budget and Capital
|
||
Improvement Budget set by the Town Council and fund
|
||
them from any revenue over expenses on an annual basis
|
||
until the percentages are met.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Undertake a boundary adjustment study to
|
||
determine the feasibility and efficacy of pursuing a future
|
||
boundary adjustment with Tazewell County. (Repeated
|
||
from page 41.)
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
50
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
51
|
||
|
||
3.7 TRANSPORTATION
|
||
Transportation planning for Richlands is chiefly influenced by
|
||
|
||
statewide and regional planning efforts. The Virginia Department
|
||
|
||
of Transportation (VDOT) VTrans 2035 Surface Transportation Plan
|
||
|
||
was the statewide plan that guided the most recent regional
|
||
|
||
transportation planning effort of the Cumberland Plateau Planning
|
||
|
||
District Commission (PDC) in partnership with its allied local
|
||
|
||
governments. The projects identified in this plan were determined
|
||
|
||
by locally identified needs and are not necessarily constrained by
|
||
|
||
cost limits. Seventeen road projects in Richlands were identified for
|
||
|
||
implementation over a 25-year planning horizon, divided into short-
|
||
|
||
term, mid-term, and long-term timeframes.
|
||
|
||
The replacement of the US 460 Business/Front Street bridge over
|
||
|
||
the Clinch River was the highest priority short-term road
|
||
|
||
improvement project and work has been completed. Short term
|
||
|
||
goals also include increased road signage for secondary roads that
|
||
|
||
intersect with Front Street and Second Street and the widening of
|
||
|
||
Front Street/Business Route 460 to three lanes between the
|
||
|
||
convergence of Second Street and Front Street and the western
|
||
|
||
Clinch River Bridge. Over the mid-term, the condition of Town
|
||
|
||
bridges has been identified as a high priority. Two bridges that cross
|
||
|
||
the Clinch River, as well as the Veterans Drive overpass have all been
|
||
|
||
recognized as in need of repair. Long-term improvements include
|
||
|
||
improvements to the railroad grade at the crossings that connect
|
||
|
||
Clinch Street to US 460, expanding the width of Big Creek Road to
|
||
|
||
modern standards, and extending Veterans Drive beyond the
|
||
|
||
intersection with Second Street to connect to US 460 Bypass.
|
||
|
||
The full list of desired improvements put forward in this Regional
|
||
|
||
Plan is shown in Figure 25 below and on the next page and are
|
||
|
||
shown on the Transportation Improvement Plans map that follows
|
||
|
||
page 51.
|
||
|
||
Figure 25: Richlands Priority Road Projects in Current Regional Plan
|
||
|
||
|
||
Location Timeframe Description
|
||
|
||
1 US 460 (Richlands Bypass)/US
|
||
|
||
460 Bus. (Front St.)
|
||
|
||
Short Improve US 460 Bus. approach to the
|
||
|
||
intersection as part of bridge replacement at
|
||
|
||
west end Clinch River. (COMPLETED)
|
||
|
||
2 US 460 Bus. (Front St.)/Bridge
|
||
|
||
over west end Clinch River
|
||
|
||
Short Replace bridge and reconstruct nearby
|
||
|
||
approaches. (COMPLETED)
|
||
|
||
3 460 Bus. (front St.)/Scott St. Short Add street name signs onto mast arms.
|
||
|
||
4 Second St./Scott St. Short Add street name signs onto mast arms.
|
||
|
||
5 Second St./Suffolk Ave. Short Add street name signs, “No U-turn” signs for
|
||
|
||
westbound approach, and speed limit sign
|
||
|
||
west of intersection.
|
||
|
||
6 Second St./Railroad Ave. Short Add street name signs and “No U-turn” signs
|
||
|
||
for westbound approach.
|
||
|
||
7 US 460 Bus. (Front St.)/Railroad
|
||
|
||
Ave.
|
||
|
||
Short Add street name signs and speed limit sign just
|
||
|
||
west of intersection.
|
||
|
||
8 US 460 Bus. (front St.)/Allegheny
|
||
|
||
St.
|
||
|
||
Short Add street name signs to mast arms.
|
||
|
||
9 US 460 Bus. (front St.)/Floyd St. Short Add street name signs to mast arms.
|
||
|
||
10 Second St./Rockbridge Ave. Short Add street name signs to mast arms.
|
||
|
||
11 US 460 Bus. (front St.) from
|
||
|
||
bridge over west end Clinch
|
||
|
||
River to Second St.
|
||
|
||
Short Widen roadway to three-lane urban standards
|
||
|
||
to provide two-way left turn lanes.
|
||
|
||
(COMPLETED)
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
3.7 TRANSPORTATION
|
||
|
||
Transportation planning for Richlands is chiefly influenced by
|
||
statewide and regional planning efforts. The Virginia Department
|
||
of Transportation (VDOT) VTrans 2035 Surface Transportation Plan
|
||
was the statewide plan that guided the most recent regional
|
||
transportation planning effort of the Cumberland Plateau Planning
|
||
District Commission (PDC) in partnership with its allied local
|
||
governments. The projects identified in this plan were determined
|
||
by locally identified needs and are not necessarily constrained by
|
||
cost limits. Seventeen road projects in Richlands were identified for
|
||
implementation over a 25-year planning horizon, divided into short-
|
||
term, mid-term, and long-term timeframes.
|
||
|
||
The replacement of the US 460 Business/Front Street bridge over
|
||
the Clinch River was the highest priority short-term road
|
||
improvement project and work has been completed. Short term
|
||
goals also include increased road signage for secondary roads that
|
||
intersect with Front Street and Second Street and the widening of
|
||
Front Street/Business Route 460 to three lanes between the
|
||
convergence of Second Street and Front Street and the western
|
||
Clinch River Bridge. Over the mid-term, the condition of Town
|
||
bridges has been identified as a high priority. Two bridges that cross
|
||
the Clinch River, as well as the Veterans Drive overpass have all been
|
||
recognized as in need of repair. Long-term improvements include
|
||
improvements to the railroad grade at the crossings that connect
|
||
Clinch Street to US 460, expanding the width of Big Creek Road to
|
||
modern standards, and extending Veterans Drive beyond the
|
||
intersection with Second Street to connect to US 460 Bypass.
|
||
|
||
The full list of desired improvements put forward in this Regional
|
||
Plan is shown in Figure 25 below and on the next page and are
|
||
|
||
shown on the Transportation Improvement Plans map that follows
|
||
page 51.
|
||
|
||
Figure 25: Richlands Priority Road Projects in Current Regional Plan
|
||
|
||
Toeation Timeframe Description
|
||
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
US 460 (Richlands Bypassy/US short
|
||
460 Bus, (Front St.)
|
||
|
||
Tmprove US 460 Bus. approach to the
|
||
Intersection as part of bridge replacement at
|
||
west end Clinch River. (COMPLETED)
|
||
|
||
US 460 Bus, (Front St/Bridge short
|
||
over west end clinch River
|
||
|
||
Replace bridge and reconstruct
|
||
approaches, (COMPLETED)
|
||
|
||
nearby
|
||
|
||
{460 Bus. (front St)/Scott st. Short [Add street name signs onto mast rm
|
||
|
||
Second St./Scott St Short [Add street name signs onto mast arms.
|
||
|
||
‘Second St,/Suffolk Ave. ‘Short [Add street name signs, "No U-turn” signs for
|
||
westbound approach, and speed limit sign
|
||
west of intersection,
|
||
|
||
Second St/Rallroad Ave. Short ‘Add street name signs and “No U-turn” signs
|
||
|
||
for westbound approach
|
||
|
||
US 460 us. (Front St)/Raiload short ‘Add street name signs and speed limit sign just
|
||
ave. west of intersection
|
||
|
||
US 460 Bus. front St./Allegheny Short
|
||
st
|
||
|
||
[Add street name signs to mast arms.
|
||
|
||
US 460 Bus. (front St/Floyd St. Short [Add street name signs to mast arms.
|
||
|
||
Second St /Rockbridge Ave, Short |Add street name signs to mast arms.
|
||
|
||
US 460 Bus. (front St) from short
|
||
bridge over west end Clinch
|
||
River to Second St.
|
||
|
||
‘Widen roadway to three-lane urban standards
|
||
to provide two-way left tur lanes.
|
||
(compLereD)
|
||
|
||
51
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
52
|
||
|
||
12 US 460 Bus. (Front St.)/Bridge
|
||
|
||
over east end Clinch River
|
||
|
||
Mid Upgrade bridge.
|
||
|
||
13 US 460 Bus. (Second St.)/Bridge
|
||
|
||
over east end Clinch River
|
||
|
||
Mid Upgrade bridge.
|
||
|
||
14 VA 609 (Veterans Dr.) at Bridge
|
||
|
||
w. of Incubator
|
||
|
||
Mid Upgrade bridge.
|
||
|
||
15 Clinch St./railroad crossing (near
|
||
|
||
Altizer)
|
||
|
||
Long Lower railroad to eliminate humped crossing.
|
||
|
||
16 Clinch St./railroad crossing (near
|
||
|
||
Lake Park Dr.)
|
||
|
||
Long Lower railroad to eliminate humped crossing.
|
||
|
||
17 VA 67 (Big Creek Rd.) from
|
||
|
||
Kentucky Ave. to 0.62 Mi. SW of
|
||
|
||
NCL
|
||
|
||
Long Reconstruct to two-lane urban standards.
|
||
|
||
18 VA 67 (Big Creek Rd.) from 0.31
|
||
|
||
Mi. SW of NCL to NCL
|
||
|
||
Long Reconstruct to two-lane urban standards.
|
||
|
||
19 Veterans Dr. Ext. from Second
|
||
|
||
St./Veterans Dr. intersection to
|
||
|
||
US 460 Bypass
|
||
|
||
Long Extend Veterans Dr. from Second St. to US 460
|
||
|
||
Bypass and construct to two-lane urban
|
||
|
||
standards, including new bridge over Clinch
|
||
|
||
River.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richland’s transportation projects currently scheduled in the Six
|
||
|
||
Year Improvement Plan that was approved under the VTrans 2035
|
||
|
||
planning process are listed in the next column. Project 1A on this
|
||
|
||
list is also shown on the Transportation Improvement Plans map
|
||
|
||
that follows this page.
|
||
|
||
Figure 26: Richlands Road Projects in Previous SYIP through 2022
|
||
|
||
|
||
Description
|
||
(values in $ thousands)
|
||
|
||
Estimate Previous FY17 FY18-22 Balance
|
||
|
||
1A Bridge Replacement - Front
|
||
|
||
Street (Bus. 460) over Big
|
||
|
||
Town Hill Creek
|
||
|
||
$3,770 $2,095 $- $1,675 $-
|
||
|
||
2A Railroad Section Foreman's
|
||
|
||
House Restoration
|
||
|
||
$532 $604 $- $- $(71)
|
||
|
||
3A Pavement overlay and
|
||
|
||
maintenance
|
||
|
||
$700 $700 $- $- $-
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
16
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
US 460 Bus. (Front StV/aridge Mid Upgrade bridge.
|
||
‘over east end Clinch River
|
||
|
||
US 460 Bus, (Second St)/Bridge Mid Uperade bridge.
|
||
|
||
‘ver east end Clinch River
|
||
|
||
VA 608 (Veterans Dr.) at Bridge Mid Upgrade bridge.
|
||
|
||
of incubator
|
||
|
||
Clinch St railroad crossing (near Long: Lower railroad to eliminate humped crossing
|
||
altize)
|
||
|
||
Cline St /rairoad crossing (near Long, Lower railroad to eliminate humped crossing
|
||
Lake Park Dr)
|
||
|
||
VA 67 (Big Creek Rd) from Long. Reconstruct to twovlane urban standards.
|
||
Kentucky Ave, t0 0.62 Mi. SW of
|
||
|
||
New
|
||
|
||
VA 67 (Big Creek Rd) from 0.31 Long, Reconstruct to two-lane urban standards.
|
||
|
||
(Mi, SW of NCL to NCL
|
||
|
||
Veterans Dr. Ext. from Second Long. Extend Veterans Dr. from Second St. to US 460
|
||
|
||
St,Neterans Dr. intersection to
|
||
Us 460 Bypass
|
||
|
||
Bypass and construct to two-lane urban
|
||
standards, inuding new bridge over Clinch
|
||
River.
|
||
|
||
Richland’s transportation projects currently scheduled in the Six
|
||
Year Improvement Plan that was approved under the VTrans 2035,
|
||
planning process are listed in the next column. Project 1 on this
|
||
list is also shown on the Transportation Improvement Plans map
|
||
that follows this page.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Figure 26: Richlands Road Projects in Previous SYIP through 2022
|
||
|
||
Description
|
||
{values in $ thousands)
|
||
|
||
Estimate
|
||
|
||
Previous FYI7 FYI6-22 Balance
|
||
|
||
2A
|
||
|
||
‘Bridge Replacement - Front
|
||
Street (Bus. 460) over Big
|
||
Town Hill Creek
|
||
|
||
Railroad Section Foreman’s
|
||
House Restoration
|
||
|
||
Pavement
|
||
maintenance
|
||
|
||
overlay and
|
||
|
||
3770
|
||
|
||
$532
|
||
|
||
$700
|
||
|
||
32085
|
||
|
||
aes =
|
||
|
||
$604 s. sy)
|
||
|
||
$700 SS cS
|
||
|
||
52
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLANS
|
||
|
||
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STUDY
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
53
|
||
|
||
VDOT’s new VTrans 2040 Vision has been put forward that identifies
|
||
|
||
statewide visions and funding priorities that will help direct future
|
||
|
||
regional planning efforts. A more detailed transportation plan, the
|
||
|
||
VTrans 2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan will replace the
|
||
|
||
existing 2035 plan in 2016. In the future, improvements identified
|
||
|
||
in each regional plan will be prioritized for funding based on their
|
||
|
||
connection to these specific funding priorities. The Six Year
|
||
|
||
Improvement Plan (SYIP) has long been used as a means of listing
|
||
|
||
the transportation improvements that have been selected by VDOT
|
||
|
||
and scheduled for implementation over six years.
|
||
|
||
Under VTrans 2040, moving a project from the planning stage to
|
||
|
||
being programmed and funded under the SYIP will be on
|
||
|
||
competitive basis according to these new priorities:
|
||
|
||
A. Economic Competitiveness and Prosperity: invest in a
|
||
|
||
transportation system that supports a robust, diverse, and
|
||
|
||
competitive economy.
|
||
|
||
B. Accessible and Connected Places: increase the oppor-
|
||
|
||
tunities for people and businesses to efficiently access jobs,
|
||
|
||
services, activity centers, and distribution hubs.
|
||
|
||
C. Safety for All Users: provide a safe transportation system
|
||
|
||
for passengers and goods on all travel modes.
|
||
|
||
D. Proactive System Management: maintain the transport-
|
||
|
||
ation system in good condition and leverage technology to
|
||
|
||
optimize existing and new infrastructure.
|
||
|
||
E. Healthy and Sustainable Communities: support a variety of
|
||
|
||
community types promoting local economies and healthy
|
||
|
||
multi‐modal lifestyles that minimize vehicle travel, while
|
||
|
||
preserving agricultural, natural, historic and cultural
|
||
|
||
resources.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, the VTrans 2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan
|
||
|
||
serves to delineate how funding decisions will be made in the
|
||
|
||
future, particularly as related to the funding that are available
|
||
|
||
according to the terms of House Bill 2 (HB2) approved in 2014, now
|
||
|
||
called SMART SCALE. This competitive process has already begun
|
||
|
||
with round one funding being awarded in 2016 and added to the Six
|
||
|
||
Year Improvement Plan. Though a match is not required for SMART
|
||
|
||
SCALE funding, in the first round, 321 applications were submitted
|
||
|
||
requesting $6.95 billion in funding with $7.93 billion in other funds
|
||
|
||
also included for the projects.
|
||
|
||
Future applications will be due in the fall of each year for funds to
|
||
|
||
be awarded the following year through inclusion in the Six Year
|
||
|
||
Improvement Plan as either a VDOT High Priority Project (category
|
||
|
||
# 1 and #2 below) or through the Construction District Grant
|
||
|
||
Program (all categories below). SMART SCALE funded projects fall
|
||
|
||
into four (4) categories:
|
||
|
||
1. Corridor of Statewide Significance – key multimodal travel
|
||
|
||
corridors that move people and goods within and through
|
||
|
||
Virginia, serving primarily long-distance/interregional
|
||
|
||
travel.
|
||
|
||
2. Regional Networks – multimodal networks that facilitate
|
||
|
||
intraregional travel within highly urbanized areas.
|
||
|
||
3. Urban Development Areas (UDA) – areas where juris-
|
||
|
||
dictions intend to concentrate future population growth
|
||
|
||
and development consistent with the UDA definition in the
|
||
|
||
Code of Virginia.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
VDOT's new VTrans 2040 Vision has been put forward that identifies
|
||
statewide visions and funding priorities that will help direct future
|
||
regional planning efforts. A more detailed transportation plan, the
|
||
VTrans 2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan will replace the
|
||
existing 2035 plan in 2016. In the future, improvements identified
|
||
in each regional plan will be prioritized for funding based on their
|
||
connection to these specific funding priorities. The Six Year
|
||
Improvement Plan (SYIP) has long been used as a means of listing
|
||
the transportation improvements that have been selected by VDOT
|
||
and scheduled for implementation over six years.
|
||
|
||
Under VTrans 2040, moving a project from the planning stage to
|
||
being programmed and funded under the SYIP will be on
|
||
competitive basis according to these new priorities:
|
||
|
||
‘A. Economic Competitiveness and Prosperity: invest in a
|
||
transportation system that supports a robust, diverse, and
|
||
competitive economy.
|
||
|
||
B. Accessible and Connected Places: increase the oppor-
|
||
tunities for people and businesses to efficiently access jobs,
|
||
services, activity centers, and distribution hubs.
|
||
|
||
C. Safety for All Users: provide a safe transportation system
|
||
for passengers and goods on all travel modes.
|
||
|
||
D. Proactive System Management: maintain the transport-
|
||
ation system in good condition and leverage technology to
|
||
optimize existing and new infrastructure.
|
||
|
||
E. Healthy and Sustainable Communities: support a variety of
|
||
community types promoting local economies and healthy
|
||
multi-modal lifestyles that minimize vehicle travel, while
|
||
|
||
preserving agricultural, natural, historic and cultural
|
||
resources.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, the VTrans 2040 Multimodal Transporta
|
||
serves to delineate how funding decisions will be made in the
|
||
future, particularly as related to the funding that are available
|
||
according to the terms of House Bill 2 (HB2) approved in 2014, now
|
||
called SMART SCALE. This competitive process has already begun
|
||
with round one funding being awarded in 2016 and added to the Six
|
||
Year Improvement Plan. Though a match is not required for SMART
|
||
SCALE funding, in the first round, 321 applications were submitted
|
||
requesting $6.95 billion in funding with $7.93 billion in other funds
|
||
also included for the projects.
|
||
|
||
n Plan
|
||
|
||
Future applications will be due in the fall of each year for funds to
|
||
be awarded the following year through inclusion in the Six Year
|
||
Improvement Plan as either a VDOT High Priority Project (category
|
||
# 1 and #2 below) or through the Construction District Grant
|
||
Program (all categories below). SMART SCALE funded projects fall
|
||
into four (4) categories:
|
||
|
||
1. Corridor of Statewide Significance ~ key multimodal travel
|
||
corridors that move people and goods within and through
|
||
Virginia, serving primarily long-distance/interregional
|
||
travel
|
||
|
||
2. Regional Networks - multimodal networks that facilitate
|
||
intraregional travel within highly urbanized areas.
|
||
|
||
3. Urban Development Areas (UDA) - areas where juris-
|
||
dictions intend to concentrate future population growth
|
||
and development consistent with the UDA definition in the
|
||
Code of Virginia
|
||
|
||
53
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
54
|
||
|
||
4. Transportation Safety Needs – statewide safety needs
|
||
|
||
identified in VTrans2040.
|
||
|
||
SMART SCALE funded projects are scored and awarded funds based
|
||
|
||
on their impact on the following evaluation criteria/measures:
|
||
|
||
1. Safety
|
||
|
||
2. Congestion Mitigation
|
||
|
||
3. Accessibility
|
||
|
||
4. Environmental Quality
|
||
|
||
5. Economic Development
|
||
|
||
6. Land Use Coordination for Areas Over 200,000 in Population
|
||
|
||
Though SMART SCALE applications are scored objectively on the
|
||
|
||
criteria listed above, the criteria are weighted based on the location
|
||
|
||
of the project. In Southside and Southwest Virginia, the weighting
|
||
|
||
factor is skewed toward projects that generate economic
|
||
|
||
development.
|
||
|
||
It is very important to note that U.S. 460 is a Corridor of Statewide
|
||
|
||
Significance. Such Corridors include parallel roads and other
|
||
|
||
adjoining transportation facilities such as airports and ports. Being
|
||
|
||
on the U.S. 460 Corridor is a very big plus for the Town of Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Beyond projects funded through the Six Year Improvement Plan and
|
||
|
||
the SMART SCALE funding process, the Town of Richlands will
|
||
|
||
continue to receive an annual allocation of Urban Maintenance
|
||
|
||
Program funds. The Town will also be able to apply for Revenue
|
||
|
||
Sharing funds, but these funds must be matched dollar for dollar.
|
||
|
||
Of particular concern to the Town of Richlands is the number of
|
||
|
||
bridges in the Town and the need for significant maintenance and
|
||
|
||
upgrades that they require. Given this looming need, Town and
|
||
|
||
Tazewell County staff and elected leaders and representatives from
|
||
|
||
the Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission will need to
|
||
|
||
make a strong case for local improvements using the funding
|
||
|
||
priorities identified in VTRANS 2040 and by the SMART SCALE
|
||
|
||
funding process.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies are intended to help
|
||
|
||
the Town of Richlands take the lead in meeting its transportation
|
||
|
||
needs for the future:
|
||
|
||
Goal: To improve the quality, viability, connectivity, and safety of
|
||
|
||
the existing transportation network in the Town of Richlands
|
||
|
||
including improvements that promote a “multi-modal lifestyle” and
|
||
|
||
expand the economic opportunities and prosperity of the
|
||
|
||
community and its citizens.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A reframing of all existing and future transportation
|
||
|
||
improvements per the priorities established by the VTrans 2040
|
||
|
||
Multimodal Transportation Plan.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A repositioning of the Town of Richlands as a key
|
||
|
||
part of the U.S. Route 460 Corridor of Statewide Significance as
|
||
|
||
delineated in the VTrans 2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan
|
||
|
||
and the funding protocols and scoring criteria for SMART SCALE
|
||
|
||
funding as established by VDOT in order to secure needed
|
||
|
||
resources.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
4. Transportation Safety Needs — statewide safety needs
|
||
identified in VTrans2040.
|
||
|
||
SMART SCALE funded projects are scored and awarded funds based
|
||
on their impact on the following evaluation criteria/measures:
|
||
|
||
1. Safety
|
||
Congestion Mitigation
|
||
|
||
Accessibility
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
3
|
||
|
||
4. Environmental Quality
|
||
5. Economic Development
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
Land Use Coordination for Areas Over 200,000 in Population
|
||
|
||
Though SMART SCALE applications are scored objectively on the
|
||
criteria listed above, the criteria are weighted based on the location
|
||
of the project. In Southside and Southwest Virginia, the weighting
|
||
factor is skewed toward projects that generate economic
|
||
development.
|
||
|
||
It is very important to note that U.S. 460 is a Corridor of Statewide
|
||
Significance. Such Corridors include parallel roads and other
|
||
adjoining transportation facilities such as airports and ports. Being
|
||
on the U.S. 460 Corridor is a very big plus for the Town of Richlands,
|
||
|
||
Beyond projects funded through the Six Year Improvement Plan and
|
||
the SMART SCALE funding process, the Town of Richlands will
|
||
continue to receive an annual allocation of Urban Maintenance
|
||
Program funds. The Town will also be able to apply for Revenue
|
||
Sharing funds, but these funds must be matched dollar for dollar.
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Of particular concern to the Town of Richlands is the number of
|
||
bridges in the Town and the need for significant maintenance and
|
||
upgrades that they require. Given this looming need, Town and
|
||
Tazewell County staff and elected leaders and representatives from
|
||
the Cumberland Plateau Planning Di Comi ion will need to
|
||
make a strong case for local improvements using the funding
|
||
priorities identified in VTRANS 2040 and by the SMART SCALE
|
||
funding process.
|
||
|
||
The following goal, objectives, and strategies are intended to help
|
||
the Town of Richlands take the lead in meeting its transportation
|
||
needs for the future:
|
||
|
||
Goal: To improve the quality, viability, connectivity, and safety of
|
||
the existing transportation network in the Town of Richlands
|
||
including improvements that promote a “multi-modal lifestyle” and
|
||
expand the economic opportunities and prosperity of the
|
||
community and its citizens.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A reframing of all existing and future transportation
|
||
improvements per the priorities established by the VTrans 2040
|
||
Multimodal Transportation Plan.
|
||
|
||
Objective: A repositioning of the Town of Richlands as a key
|
||
part of the U.S. Route 460 Corridor of Statewide Significance as
|
||
delineated in the VTrans 2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan
|
||
and the funding protocols and scoring criteria for SMART SCALE
|
||
funding as established by VDOT in order to secure needed
|
||
resources.
|
||
|
||
54
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
55
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: In cooperation with the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
|
||
Planning District Commission (PDC), Tazewell County, and
|
||
|
||
the VDOT Bristol District Office, update the Town of
|
||
|
||
Richlands portion of the PDC’s Regional Long Range
|
||
|
||
Transportation Improvement Plan.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: On annual basis and in consultation with the
|
||
|
||
VDOT Bristol District Office, seek to submit a SMART SCALE
|
||
|
||
funding application for new, expanded, and significantly
|
||
|
||
improved roadways and other components of the
|
||
|
||
transportation network as a part of a Corridor of Statewide
|
||
|
||
Significance with a goal of improving the economic
|
||
|
||
competitiveness and prosperity of the Town and region or
|
||
|
||
to alleviate unsafe conditions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: In cooperation with the Cumberland Plateau
|
||
Planning District Commission (PDC), Tazewell County, and
|
||
the VDOT Bristol District Office, update the Town of
|
||
Richlands portion of the PDC’s Regional Long Range
|
||
Transportation Improvement Plan.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: On annual basis and in consultation with the
|
||
VDOT Bristol District Office, seek to submit a SMART SCALE
|
||
funding application for new, expanded, and significantly
|
||
improved roadways and other components of the
|
||
transportation network as a part of a Corridor of Statewide
|
||
Significance with a goal of improving the economic
|
||
competitiveness and prosperity of the Town and region or
|
||
to alleviate unsafe conditions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
56
|
||
|
||
[This page is intentionally left blank.]
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
[This page is intentionally left blank.]
|
||
|
||
56
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
57
|
||
|
||
4 IMPLEMENTATION
|
||
|
||
The success of a Comprehensive Plan depends on a scheduled
|
||
|
||
implementation of the Plan’s goals, objective, and strategies that is
|
||
|
||
monitored and adjusted as needed over the life of the Plan. The
|
||
|
||
following Implementation Schedule outlines out how the “on the
|
||
|
||
ground” work of this Comprehensive Plan is to unfold. It serves the
|
||
|
||
purpose of pacing the work in order that planning proceeds
|
||
|
||
expenditures to make sure funds are secured and expended in a
|
||
|
||
timely and prudent manner.
|
||
|
||
This Implementation Schedule also lines out the less capital
|
||
|
||
intensive actions that reflect changes in focus or priorities, in the
|
||
|
||
budgeting process, and in how the Town publicizes development
|
||
|
||
opportunities within the Town. While not capital intensive, these
|
||
|
||
actions could be just as impactful. It is hoped that these actions
|
||
|
||
become imbedded in the DNA of the Town of Richlands and are
|
||
|
||
repeated on a regular basis as long as they prove useful to the
|
||
|
||
Town’s growth and development.
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
4 IMPLEMENTATION
|
||
|
||
The success of a Comprehensive Plan depends on a scheduled
|
||
implementation of the Plan's goals, objective, and strategies that is
|
||
monitored and adjusted as needed over the of the Plan. The
|
||
following Implementation Schedule outlines out how the “on the
|
||
ground” work of this Comprehensive Plan is to unfold. It serves the
|
||
Purpose of pacing the work in order that planning proceeds
|
||
expenditures to make sure funds are secured and expended in a
|
||
timely and prudent manner.
|
||
|
||
This Implementation Schedule also lines out the less capital
|
||
intensive actions that reflect changes in focus or priorities, in the
|
||
budgeting process, and in how the Town publicizes development
|
||
opportunities within the Town. While not capital intensive, these
|
||
actions could be just as impactful. It is hoped that these actions
|
||
become imbedded in the DNA of the Town of Richlands and are
|
||
repeated on a regular basis as long as they prove useful to the
|
||
Town’s growth and development.
|
||
|
||
s7
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
|
||
58
|
||
|
||
[This page is left intentionally blank.]
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
[This page is left intentionally blank.)
|
||
|
||
58
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Implementation Schedule
|
||
Year 1
|
||
|
||
Year 2
|
||
|
||
Year 3
|
||
|
||
Year 4
|
||
|
||
Year 5
|
||
|
||
Year 6
|
||
|
||
Year 7
|
||
|
||
Year 8
|
||
|
||
Year 9
|
||
|
||
Year 1
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
Land Use & Development
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Utilize Future Land Use Map as a platform for future land use decisions.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Update and upgrade the Town Zoning Ordinance and Map.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Develop new "floating zone" zoning categories for inclusion in the Zoning Ordinance.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Adopt and implement a Real Estate Property Tax Partial Exemption Ordinance.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: Adopt and implement a Land Use Assessment Ordinance.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #6: Undertake a boundary adjustment study to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a future adjustment.
|
||
|
||
Housing & Neighborhoods
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Conduct a town-wide housing study utilizing a Planning Grant from VDHCD.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Plan for, submit an application, and implement a CDBG-funded neighborhood housing rehab project.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Work with a non-profit community development corporation to develop new low- to moderate-income housing.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Secure VHDA Mixed Use-Mixed Income (MUMI) Planning Grant for downtown adaptive reuse.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: Develop and maintain a "housing opportunities available in Richlands" section of the Town's website.
|
||
|
||
Economic Development
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Plan for, submit an application, and implement a CDBG-funded downtown revitalization project west of the Clinch River.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Continue to develop natural gas as a town-wide utility and at the right stage take a stronger role in developing the asset.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: In cooperation with Tazewell County and VEDP, promote the Town of Richland's Enterprise Zone.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: In cooperation with Tazewell County and the CRVI, promote Downtown Richland's historic and cultural assets.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #5: In cooperation with the SBDC of SVCC, Tazewell County, and the Workforce Center, develop an Entrepreneur "Boot Camp."
|
||
|
||
Strategy #6: In cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce, host a twice yearly forum on development opportunities in Richlands.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #7: Develop and maintain an "economic development opportunities available in Richlands" section of the Town's website.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #8: Maintain an awareness of and vigorously pursue all state funding available for economic development.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #9: Regularly participate in economic development forums, training events, and promotional events.
|
||
|
||
Community Services, Facilities & Utilities
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Regularly develop a more robust 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: Determine on a 5-year basis an annual General Fund allocation to fund the Capital Improvement Plan.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Create "rainy day" General Fund and Capital Improvement reserves to be funded at percentages set by Council.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: Undertake a boundary adjustment study to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a future adjustment.
|
||
|
||
Transportation
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: In cooperation with local/regional partners, update the Town's portion of the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #2: On annual basis, seek to submit a SMART SCALE application for funding to improve and expand the transportation network.
|
||
|
||
59
|
||
|
||
Richlands
|
||
|
||
Comprehensive Plan 2016
|
||
|
||
Implementation Schedule SEES ESSEESS
|
||
Suateg Utz Futire Land Use Map a plato for future land ue decsons. vivieivielelviviele
|
||
Straten #2: Update and upgrade the Town Zoning Ordinance and Map. vie
|
||
Seatey #3: Develop new “otng one zoning ctor for incsion nthe Zoning Ordnance vie
|
||
Strategy: Adopt and implementa fel Esa Property Tat arial Exemption Ordnance viv
|
||
Sursteg/#5: Adopt and implement Land Us Assessment Ordnance, viv
|
||
Suatey #5. Undertake» boundary adjustment study to determin the eat and eficacy ofa ture ade “
|
||
|
||
Strategy: Conduct a townie housing study lang Planing Grant rom VOHED z
|
||
|
||
Straten #2: Plan for, submit an appicaton, and implementa CDBG funded neighborhood housing rehab project viele
|
||
|
||
Strategy #3: Werk witha non-profit communty development earporation o develop new lw-to maderatencome housing. vivle[<
|
||
|
||
Straten #: Secure VHDA Mined Use Mined Income (MUM Paning Gran fr downtown adoptive ese z
|
||
|
||
urate 85: Develop and maintain “housing opportrites viable n Richlands” section ofthe Town's website PaParArarararararars
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Plan for, submit an application, and implement a CDBG funded downtown revitalization project west ofthe Glinch ive.
|
||
|
||
Strategy 2: Continue to develop natural gas a 2 town-wde utility and atthe right stage take a stronger role in developing the asset
|
||
Strategy #3: In cooperation with Tazewell County and VEOP, promote the Town of Richlands Enterprise Zone.
|
||
|
||
Strategy #4: In cooperation with Tazewell County and the CRM, promote Downtown Richlands historic ad cuturl assets
|
||
Srateny 85: In cooperation with the SBDC of SUCC, Tazewell County, and the Workfore Center, develop an Entrepreneur “Boot Camp.
|
||
Strategy 6: In cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce, host twice yearly forum on development opportunites in Richlands,
|
||
Strategy #7: Develop and maintain a
|
||
Strategy #8: Maintain an awareness of and vigorously pursue all tate funding avalablefor economic development.
|
||
|
||
<
|
||
<
|
||
<
|
||
<
|
||
s
|
||
|
||
<
|
||
<
|
||
<
|
||
<
|
||
<
|
||
|
||
‘economic development opportunities available in Richlands" section ofthe Town's website
|
||
|
||
Porerererererere
|
||
PoreceCerecererars
|
||
SSS
|
||
Perererererererans
|
||
fererene
|
||
ss
|
||
ererens
|
||
pererere
|
||
Porerers
|
||
erates
|
||
|
||
events, 204 pro
|
||
|
||
Strategy #1: Regularly develop a more robust 5Year Capital Improvement Plan
|
||
Strategy 2: Determine on a 5-year bass an annual General Fund allocation to fund the Capital improvement Pan
|
||
Strategy #3: Create “rainy day” General Fund and Capital Improvement reserves tobe funded at percentages set by Counc
|
||
|
||
carers
|
||
.
|
||
5
|
||
.
|
||
S
|
||
.
|
||
<
|
||
|
||
<
|
||
|
||
tegy Hd: Undertake 2 boundary adjustment study to determine the feaibiltyand efficacy of 2 future adjustment.
|
||
Transportation
|
||
Strategy #1: In cooperation with local/regional partners, update the Town's portion of the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan. | ¥ | ¥
|
||
Strategy #2: On annual basis, seek to submit a SMART SCALE application for funding to improve and expand the transportation network viviviviviviviviy
|
||
|
||
59
|
||
|
||
|
||
|