--- type: document title: 2010-Audit file: ../2010-Audit.pdf tags: - Russell_County - Audit_and_Budget_Information - '2010' docDate: '2010' contentType: application/pdf contentLength: 2074323 sha256sum: 28f39a05632990c49f0a114ee342670a09d503d4158d627c542dbfe6c2aa7c36 sha1sum: 38120c30f4ef3c5eb24985046615cda1414375d0 --- COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 201 0 COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 INTRODUCTORY SECTION COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Elected and Appointed Officials................................................................................................. 1 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors' Report .. . ... . ... . .. . .. . . .. . .. . ... .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. . ... . .. . ... . ... . . .. . .... .. . .. . ... . .. . .. ... . .. . .. . .. .. . 2·3 Exhibit Page Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Assets ................................................................................................................. . 1 4 Statement of Activities ..................................................................................................................... . 2 5 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet- Governmental Funds ......................................................................................... .. 3 6 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets ............................................................................................................................. .. 4 7 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances- Governmental Funds .................................................................................................................. . 5 8 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities .................................. . 6 9 Statement of Net Assets - Proprietary Funds ................................................................................. . 7 10 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets- Proprietary Funds .................................................................................................................... . 8 11 Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds ............................................................................... .. 9 12 Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets- Fiduciary Funds ................................................................... .. 10 13 Notes to Financial Statements ........................................................................................................... . 14·51 Required Supplementary Information: Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances- Budget and Actual· General Fund ........................................................................................................ 11 52 Budget and Actual- Special Revenue Fund -Industrial Development............................................ 12 53 Budget and Actual- Special Revenue Fund- Coal Road............................................................... 13 54 Budget and Actual· Special Revenue Fund- Rental Assistance................................................... 14 55 Schedule of OPES and Pension Funding Progress.............................................................................. 15 56 COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FiscaL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Page List of Elected and Appointed Official 1 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors' Report .... 23 Exhibit Page Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Assets 1 4 Statement of Activities 2 5 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet — Governmental Funds ..... 3 6 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets .. 4 7 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Governmental Funds 5 8 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 6 9 Statement of Net Assets ~ Proprietary Funds... 7 10 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets - Proprietary Funds 8 Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds. 9 12 Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets - Fiduciary Funds. 1 18 Notes to Financial Statements. 14-51 Required Supplementary Information: Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances ~ ‘Budget and Actual - General Fund... 52 Budget and Actual - Special Revenue Fund — Industrial Development. 12 53 Budget and Actual - Special Revenue Fund ~ Coal Road 13 84 Budget and Actual - Special Revenue Fund — Rental Assistance 14 85 Schedule of OPEB and Pension Funding Progress... 15 56 COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Other Supplementary Information Section: Supplementary Financial Statements Discretely Presented Component Unit- School Board: Exhibit Page Balance Sheet................................................................................................................................. 16 57 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -- Governmental Funds................................................................................................................... 17 58 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances- Budget and Actual........................................................................................................................ 18 59 Schedule Page Supporting Schedules: Schedule of Revenues- Budget and Actual - Governmental Funds ................................................ . 1 60-65 Schedule of Expenditures- Budget and Actual - Governmental Funds .......................................... .. 2 66-69 Other Statistical Information: Government-wide Information: Government-Wide Expenses by Function....................................................................................... 1 70 Government-Wide Revenues.......................................................................................................... 2 71 Fund Information: General Governmental Expenditures by Function........................................................................... 3 72 General Governmental Revenues by Source.................................................................................. 4 73 Property Tax Levies and Collections............................................................................................... 5 74 Assessed Value of Taxable Property............................................................................................... 6 75 Property Tax Rates......................................................................................................................... 7 76 Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita........................................................................................................................... 8 77 Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Governmental Expenditures................................................................................. 9 78 COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FiscaL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 ‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Other Supplementary Information Section: Exhibit Supplementary Financial Statements Discretely Presented Component Unit - School Board: Balance Sheet 16 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Governmental Funds. 17 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances — Budget and Actual... 18 Schedule Supporting Schedules: Schedule of Revenues — Budget and Actual - Governmental Funds 1 Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Governmental Funds 2 Other Statistical Information: Table Government-wide Information: Government-Wide Expenses by Function 1 Government-Wide Revenues... 2 Fund Information: General Governmental Expenditures by Function General Governmental Revenues by Sourc Property Tax Levies and Collections Assessed Value of Taxable Property Property Tax Rates ... Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita... 8 Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Governmental Expenditures . 9 Page 60-65 66-69 Page 70 71 72 73 74 i) 76 7 78 COMPLIANCE SECTION Compliance: COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards....................................................................... 79-80 Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133............. 81-82 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards..................................................................................... 83-85 Schedule of Findings, Responses, and Questioned Costs................................................................. 86-88 COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FiscaL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) COMPLIANCE SECTION Page Compliance: Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordanee with Government Auaiting Standards... 79-80 Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in Accordanes with OMB Circular A-133. 81-82 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards... 83-85 Schedule of Findings, Responses, and Questioned Costs.. 86-88 INTRODUCTORY SECTION INTRODUCTORY SECTION Danny Brown, Vice Chair Bob Keene Billy Wayne Wampler Charlie Collins, Vice Chair Fayrene Plaster Tom Griffith Authur Lawson, Vice Chair COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mike Puckett, Chair COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD Carl Jackson, Chair SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD Harry Ferguson, Jr., Chair Raymond Edward Harrison, Jr., Secretary OTHER OFFICIALS Jon Bowerbank Earnest (Shy) Kennedy Bob Hillman Linda Cross Bill W. Wampler Clerk of the Circuit Court ..................................................................................... Ann S. McReynolds Commonwealth's Attorney ............................................................................................... Brian Patton Commissioner of the Revenue .............................................................................. Randy N. Williams Treasurer ............................................................................................................... Patrick Thompson Sheriff ................................................................................................................................. Steve Dye Acting Superintendent of Schools ................................................................................... Mike Puckett Director of Social Services .......................................................................... Raymond E. Harrison, Jr. County Administrator ...................................................................................................... Jim Gillespie County Attorney ............................................................................................................. Dennis Jones -1- CouNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mike Puckett, Chair Danny Brown, Vice Chair Jon Bowerbank Bob Keene Eamest (Shy) Kennedy Billy Wayne Wampler COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD Carl Jackson, Chair Charlie Collins, Vice Chair Bob Hillman Fayrene Plaster Linda Cross Tom Griffith SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD Harry Ferguson, Jr., Chair ‘Authur Lawson, Vice Chair Bill W. Wampler Raymond Edward Harrison, Jr,, Secretary OTHER OFFICIALS Clerk of the Circuit Court Commonwealth's Attorney. Commissioner of the Revenue .. Treasurer Sheriff.. Acting Superintendent of Schools. Director of Social Services..... County Administrator....... County Attorney... Ann $, McReynolds seeeneee Ban Patton Randy N. Williams. Pattick Thompson Steve Dye Mike Puckett "Raymond E. Harrison, Jr. ...im Gillespie seneeeeDe@nnis Jones: FINANCIAL SECTION FINANCIAL SECTION ROBINSON, JF ARMJER, COX ASSOCIATES CER17F!ED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT> A PROFESSIONAL LIM/Tl:D L!ABILTTY COMPANY Independent Auditors' Report TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA LEBANON, VIRGINIA We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component units, the major funds, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Russell, Virginia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprise the County's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the County of Russell, Virginia's management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of the Russell County Public Service Authority, which represents 24.3% and 6.6% of the total net assets and program revenues, respectively, of the aggregate discretely presented component units. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion on the basic financial statements insofar as they relate to the amount included for the Russell County Public Service Authority in the aggregate discretely presented component unit, are based solely on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by Comptroller General of the United States; and the Specifications for Audits of Counties, Cities, and Towns, issued by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, , the business­ type activities the discretely presented component units, the major funds, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Russell, Virginia as of June 30, 2010, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 26, 2011, on our consideration of the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. -2- ROBINSON, FARMER, COX ASSOCIATES (CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ‘A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Independent Auditors’ Report TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RUSSELL, VIRGINIA LEBANON, VIRGINIA We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component units, the major funds, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Russell, Virginia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprise the County's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the County of Russell, Virginia's management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of the Russell County Public Service Authority, which teptesents 24.3% and 6.6% of the total net assets and program revenues, respectively, of the aggregate discretely presented component units. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion on the basic financial statements insofar as they relate to the amount included for the Russell County Public Service Authority in the aggregate discretely presented component unit, are based solely ‘on the report of the other auditors. ‘We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by Comptroller General of the United States; and the Specifications for Audits of Counties, Cities, and Towns, issued by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to Obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, ‘An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, , the business- type activities the discretely presented component units, the major funds, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Russell, Virginia as of June 30, 2010, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, In accordance with Goverment Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 26, 2011, on our consideration of the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The County has elected to omit Management's Discussion and Analysis which is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The budgetary comparison information and the schedules of OPES and pension funding progress as listed in the table of contents are not a required part of the basic financial statements but are supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the County of Russell, Virginia's basic financial statements. The introductory section and the other supplementary information section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements of the County of Russell, Virginia. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The introductory section and other supplementary information section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. if~tnz., ~~ dt ~oa·~ Christiansburg, Virginia January 26, 2011 -3- The County has elected to omit Management's Discussion and Analysis which is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The budgetary comparison information and the schedules of OPEB and pension funding progress as listed in the table of contents are not a required part of the basic financial statements but are supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise ‘the County of Russell, Virginia's basic financial statements. The introductory section and the other supplementary information section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements of the County of Russell, Virginia. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The introductory section and other supplementary information section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. Holeinoen, Seeman, py Chsocicttes- Christiansburg, Virginia January 26, 2011 Basic Financial Statements Basic Financial Statements Exhibit! County of Russell, Virginia Statement of Net Assets June 30,2010 Com anent Units Prima~ Government Industrial Russell County Castlewood Governmental Business·type Development Public Service Water and Sewage Activities Activities Total School Board Authoritv Authority Authority ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents 8,145,621 49,575 $ 8,195,196 1,879,511 $ 1,119,028 $ 1,569,766 $ 134,066 Investments in custody of others 1,730,417 1,730,417 Receivables (net of allowance for uncollectibles)· Taxes receivable 6,915,930 6,915,930 Accounts receivable 453,351 6,331 459,682 82,221 9,932 739,806 223,373 Notes receivable 4,344 4,344 Due from pnmary government 425,000 Due from component un1t 365,000 365,000 Due from other governmental umts 1,296,930 1,296,930 1,681,471 Inventories 20,473 Lease purchase receivable 578,160 Prepaid expenses 19,114 Othel assets Bond issuance costs 34,518 Restricted assets: Temporarity restricted: Cash and cash equivalents 2,286,757 2,286,757 426,439 117,317 Investments {in custody of others) Intergovernmental receivable Noncurrent assets· Lease purchase receivable- net ol current portion 981,372 Capital assets (net of accumulated depreciation) Land 1,541,333 1,541,333 4,643,707 1,439,397 106,332 102,830 Bu1ldings and improvements 15,412,448 15,412,448 11,320,900 6,310,110 2,440,501 Improvements other than buildings Machinery and equipment 1,527,586 1,527,586 1,753,256 497,577 Infrastructure 12,635,185 Utility plant in service 3,647,661 3,647,661 8,653,513 Construction in prO{lress 2,445,645 2,445,645 90,571 1,176,639 571,611 Less: Accumulated Deprecia~on 2,752,659 Total assets $ 42,125,362 3,703,567 45,828,929 21,451,637 $ 12,998,172 15,331,015 9,250,213 LIABILITIES Accounts payable 1,845,561 27,050 1,872,611 618,225 $ 43,838 387,627 55,694 Accrued liabilities 980,529 129,842 8,622 Customer deposits 10,738 43,408 Accrued interest payable 323,118 1,858 324,976 126,614 23,181 9,216 Due to primary government 200,000 165,000 Due to component unit 425,000 425,000 Unearned revenue 4,313,714 4,313,714 Long-term liabiht1es: Due within one year 2,013,436 17,867 2,031,303 2,972,910 3,870,603 233,235 Due in more than one year 20,941,961 751,554 21,693,515 1,064,578 10,781,137 3,680,992 3,928,791 Total liabilities 29,862,790 $ 798,329 30,661,"119 2,663,332 $ 14,124,499 $ 8,102,983 4,443,966 NET ASSETS Invested in capital assets, net o1 related debt 6,670,389 $ 2,878,240 $ 9,548,629 17,808,434 $ 3,889,731 $ 5,449,375 $ 4,604,201 Restricted for: Coal Road 1,514,134 1,514,134 School Construction 909,791 909,791 Debt service and bond covenants 426,439 1,113,658 117,317 Unrestricted (dencit) Total net assets The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. -4- ahi County ot use Vit ‘Start of el sae cw 20 angen nits Paar Govt inant Rss Comy Crees Gouna Basten Dnloent —PbleSerce Walrad Senge ‘eas ‘tes Tos! Satgtbsed ety pe assets an aaah exon s CS er ) Iemagin cee viaosir vroosir 7 trates fetal x cis Tasers sassao0 eg1sso0 nese ‘5351 sai ‘sae ez ae 19608 ws tee cas oe fon i, ue amr grnet : 25000 : Cie taco sso ss003 ‘is em abe goers zs uss ari ‘str i, ne (eae pae cei eseemeies wean Oat end ares msi . ee Toren estes ah anda onions 208707 are : os wna isms en ee : targets : sonar aaa pes eae rete pin . . sist oe ase pata rson at po stan tevin agesror tg scot vgn Bulent arcoporonens vee ny: aos S310; eras ope ules ° ‘achoy anes! er vase 8 sgt pore : : ve6s5905 nly pain seve sees) : : aes3513 eahsen poss 2485686 ssn ssmagc0 snst {ess cons Depesatin : . eres "alae z a uuxpumes eco p9ate s saisssn Seas) $a aes SaaS rm Se fesse, . ‘eases ase ene Case ps ‘az 08 foci 0 anid 88 usr mass Bet 8 Ohetopmay perm Ea) von Due senger 3900 25008 Sarton asia aaiarie Ung: he net 2013608 re9 aes zaesn samara ass Deh oreben creer oxi rissa aigeosig tgs anigy _—samase aga “ot tes z 1 ner asses Fessincpalases.ttitddeh ee ase Cathe saan sau Sete Cranoen ssi 02781 Dalemavarstoe coos : 2448 wan vse tat 1s moni toss mpi ssaeasn wr Teatet aes i esse §__aaiszs_S___Wsl7si0 Ses §__ueesoy § pain tsar “Then oie are anata sya pat oe So &, ' Functions/Programs PRIMARY GOVERNMENT: Govemmenlal ac11V111es Ger>eral g;JVemmenl adm1n1s1rat10fl Judrc.al adm,n1s1ra11on PUbliC safety Public works HeaHh and weilare Educat1011 Parks, recrealion, afld cultural Community development Interest on tong.1erm debt T alai governmental actJVihes Bus1ness·lype ae1111111es SeMce Aulhorrty T alai pnmary govemmenl COMPONENT UNITS: School Board lnduslrial Develq)menl Aulhonty Russell County PubliC Sef\llce Aulhorily Casllewood Water and Sewer Total compor.enl un~s Expenses 1.828.631 s 2,219,866 4,234,145 5,549,934 6.070,09t 5.897,486 41.560.110 s 1,757.836 1,643,245 1,35t.709 46.3t2.0CKJ s Generallllvenues General property taxes Other local taxes Local sates arid use taxes Coal severence taxes Coal road taxes Consumers' utility taxes Molor veh1de taxes Other local taxes Charges for Services 727 s 6,998 85.827 195.440 28.897 10.313 717,272 s 318.t58 1.()48,857 t.017,454 3.10t,74t s Program Ael'1!nues Operating Grants and Contributions 312.752 551.817 t.633.396 71.690 4,573,749 85.639 244,034 33,917,800 284,793 441,781 34.644.374 s Unrestricted revenues I rom use of money and property Miscellaneous Paymenls from 1he Countyol Russell. Virgm.a Grants and contribulions 1101 restricled 10 spec~1c J)' General Fiscal Government Judicial Public Year Administration Administration Safe!~ 2009-10 $ 1,837,926 $ 2,213,724 $ 4,100,376 $ 2008-09 1,702,193 2,236,691 4,383,789 2007-08 1,745,817 2,070,455 4,057,495 2006-07 1,547,966 1,805,418 3,863,960 2005-06 1,810,230 1,814,649 4,022,185 2004-05 1,471,043 1,059,566 3,977,841 2003-04 1,216,960 957,320 3,585,934 2002-03 1,267,146 977,540 3,651,469 2001-02 1,365,932 1,017,492 3,635,861 2000-01 1,450,187 1,031,613 3,664,306 County of Russell, Virginia General Governmental Expenditures by Function (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Parks, Public Health and Recreation, Works Welfare Education (2) and Cultural 5,491,432 $ 6,906,934 $ 41 ,066,362 $ 497,417 $ 6,093,232 6,672,387 42,452,183 547,104 5,083,514 5,398,035 39,724,130 433,946 3,205,718 5,126,034 41,346,518 493,366 3,605,915 5,003,511 39,574,345 438,198 3,434,569 4,948,270 33,030,292 339,244 3,100,508 4,893,329 33,016,616 367,686 3,067,788 4,910,495 27,683,380 378,365 2,699,858 4,968,406 27,361,431 479,313 2,555,345 4,680,775 27,897,353 419,894 Community Develo~ment 1,557,445 $ 3,925,736 5,549,375 5,699,361 7,653,814 5,186,187 2,843,672 4,133,801 3,648,003 3,435,485 (1) Includes General and Special Revenue funds of \he Primary Government and its Discretely Presented Component Unit· School Board. Excludes Capita! Projects. (2) Excludes contribution from Primary Government to Discretely Presented Component Unit · School Board. Table3 Non· Debt de~artmental Service Total 9,095 $ 2,504,631 $ 66,185,342 56,093 2,547,424 70,616,832 45,503 2,669,081 66,777,351 2,429,487 65,517,828 2,546,073 66,468,920 2,704,665 56,151,677 2,497,309 52,479,334 2,111,104 48,181,088 3,353,899 48,530,195 3,007,990 48,142,948 Teble3 County of Russel, Virginia GGenerat Governmental Expenditures by Function (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years General Pets, Fiscal Goverment cial Poblic Public Heath and Receeation, _Commrunty Nene eb ‘Year __Adrinisation Administration ___—Slty Worts ‘Wottre Education (2) and Cutural_Oavelopment_apanmantal__Servina Total 2006-10 S$ 1897928 § © —-BIATA § —4,00STS $ SANTA § GUSH § doa. § 4BTAIT S LSBTAKS $ 9095 -§ —BOKAN § —Bs.5 342 2008.08 1702198 2226891 4983789 Goua2%—6672.387 501837104 3.805795 sous ser roses? 200708 174587 40s7405 e554 5.398095 93704100 ARH BAG 75 45503 2,688,08t 6777381 200807 11547 96 3psas0 3.205718 5.126038 41gi6518 493.905.699.981, : 65517 28 2005.08 110.200 1814649 400218 305915 o0R BT 29574345 AURIS - 468,220, 200805 1713 11959368 sa77Bit 3434509 3gqs0222 «© seBzae 5,185,187 : 56,151877 2o0s04 1216.60 967,320 asesse¢ 3.400500 Beoige1s © 87H Te : 82479534 2002083 1207.46 977540 3651469 3,057,788 2rgeg390 © regs 1a 80 : 48,181,088 2oo%ae 13851922 1.017.492 3606,851 2.699868 2rasias 479219 3848.08 48,520,195 2000-91 #460.187 41031,613, 3564205 2555;948 re 45,142,948 (1) ncludes General and Special Revenue funds of he Primary Goversmen! ands Disrley Presented Component Unt - School Board, Excludes Capita Projects, (2) Excludes cotibuton tom Primary Governenent to Dscrciely Presented Component Unt Scheel Boar N > ' ___, y:> Permits, General Other Privilege Fees, Fiscal Property Local Regulatory Year Taxes Taxes 13) Licenses 2009-10 $ 12,841,457 $ 6,123,807 $ 45,877 $ 2008-09 12,540,392 7,779,265 39,662 2007-08 11,826,325 7,976,046 44,933 2006-07 11,566,874 6,869,060 144,452 2005-06 12,337,123 6,713,063 52,707 2004-05 12,204,466 5,981,937 35,700 2003-04 10,148,719 4,820,255 38,906 2002-03 10,025,380 4,785,938 45,294 2001-02 10,375,632 3,909,367 64,261 2000-01 9,124,022 3,260,808 45,707 County of Russell, Virginia General Governmental Revenues by Source (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Revenue from the Fines Useol Charges and Money and lor Forfeitures Proeerty Services 1,049 $ 74,279 $ 998,548 $ 1,168 117,983 1,148,414 321 501,144 1,023,848 7,547 794,365 1,122,223 8,181 660,142 878,017 9,430 231,701 755,446 9,938 74,324 892,392 19,552 89,715 764,203 11,766 228,739 791,877 17,217 445,809 750,746 Recovered Miscellaneous Costs 293,467 $ 1,732,861 643,861 1,884,165 510,972 796,913 289,980 276,806 310,534 187,855 192,958 266,232 209,598 283,077 209,160 145,776 164,096 476,465 383,544 291,711 (1) Includes General and Special Revenue funds of the Primary Government and its Discretely Presented Component Unit- School Board. Excludes Capital Projects. (2) Excludes contribution from Primary Government to Discretely Presented Component Unit- School Board. (3) 2009-10 is the first year State Communications tax is classified as noncategorical state aide. Table 4 Inter- governmentall2), !3) Total $ 43,856,378 $ 65,967,723 45,438,632 69,593,542 43,519,497 66,199,999 48,149,588 69,220,895 42,906,554 64,054,176 38,060,020 57,737,890 35,517,991 51,995,200 36,381,448 52,466,466 30,997,358 47,019,561 30,439,563 44,759,127 Table County of Russell, Virginia General Governmontal Revenues by Source (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Pevenue Permits, from the General Other Prvlege Fees, Fines Use of Charges Fiscal Property Local Regulatory and Money snd for Recovered tetor Year Tangs Taxes (3) Lisensos Forletures Property Services Miscellaneous ___Costs_governmantal 2), (3). Total 200810 § © 1aBH1457 § 6,123,807 § 45erT $1088 $7427 -§ —SaBsA S$ —DEHGT § I TERAEL § —«aBASESTE $5967, 729, 2008-08 10,392 7,779,265 39,662 1168 417,983, asia eagae1 1,884,165 45,499,622 69,590,542 2007-08 11226225, 7,978,086 44923, cal son tae 1023 246 s10972 798.18 43519,497 66,199,999 2008-07 11,566,874 6,969,060 44452 78a7 794,365, 1122208 269,980, 278,06 45,149,588 69,220,895 2008-08 123397,128, 6,713,063 2707 a18t 60,142 878017 310594 167,885 42,906,554 64,054,176 2004-05 127204465, 5,981,997 35,700 9490 231,701 755,448 192.958 266,232 38,080,020 57737890 2008-04 10,148,719 4.920.285 36,906, 9.938 74,324 992,392 209,598, 2077 35517.991 51,995,200 2002-03 10,025,380 4,785,898 45,284 19.552 saris 764,208, 209,160, 145,778 26,381,448 52,405,488 2003-02 10,575,632 3.909.367 eazet 11,768 28,758 1877 164.096 476,485, 30,997,858 47,019,581 2000-01, 9,124,002 3,260,008 70 weir 445,609 750,748 aaa 544 port 30,499,569 4789,127 (1) Includes General and Special Revenue funds ofthe Primary Government and its Discoely Presontad Component Unit - School Board, Exckies Capit! Projects {2) Excludes convbution kom Primary Government to Discretely Presented Component Unt» School Board, (3) 2009-10 the fist year Stele Communications axis casiled as noncategeical sale ede, Total Current Fiscal Tax Tax Year Levy(1) Collections (1) 2009-10 $ 14,169,807 $ 13,038,906 2008-09 14,091,178 13,212,582 2007-08 13,784,900 12,618,969 2006-07 12,104,262 8,435,607 2005-06 11,360,623 11,118,399 2004-05 10,576,870 9,740,619 2003-04 9,070,812 8,274,805 2002-03 8,989,461 8,106,975 .!.., 2001-02 9,760,635 8,957,849 _,. 2000-01 9,105,631 8,381,781 ' (1) Exclusive of penalties and interest. County of Russell, Virginia Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years Percent Delinquent Total of Levy Tax Tax Collected Collections (1) Collections 92.02% $ 886,480 $ 13,925,386 93.76% 496,787 13,709,369 91.54% 411,887 13,030,856 69.69% 863,735 9,299,342 97.87% 797,364 11,915,763 92.09% 537,362 10,277,981 91.22% 324,217 8,599,022 90.18% 361,604 8,468,579 91.78% 407,972 9,365,821 9205% 439,386 8,821,167 Table 5 Percent of Percent of Total Tax Outstanding Delinquent Collections Delinquent Taxes Ia to Tax Levy Taxes (1) Tax Levy 98.28% $ 3,624,318 25.58% 97.29% 3,506,132 24.88% 94.53% 3,234,367 23.46% 76.83% 1,628,182 13.45% 104.89% 1,854,243 16.32% 97.17% 1 ,849,194 17.48% 94.80% 1,772,141 19.54% 94.21% 1,853,569 20.62% 95.96% 1,481,506 15.18% 96.88% 1,290,811 14.18% 4b County of Russell, Virginia Property Tax Levies and Collections: Last Ten Fiscal Years Table 5 Percent of Percent of Total Current Percent Delinquent Total Total Tax Outstanding Detinguent Fiscal Tax Tax of Lew Tax Tax Collections Delinquent Taxes 10 Year Lewy (1) Collections (1) ___Callested_ Collections (1)__ Collections toTaxLey Taxes (1) Taxlevy 200010 $ © — 14,169,807 $ 13,038,906 92.02% $ 886,480 $13,025,386 98.28% $ 3,624,318 25.58% 2008-09 14,091,178 13,212,582 93.76% 496,787 13,709,369 97.29% — 3,506,132 24.88% 2007-08 13,784,900 12,618,969 91.54% 411,887 13,080,856 94.53% 3,234,367 23.46% 2006-07 12,104,262 8,435,607 69.69% 863,735 9,299,342 76.83% 1,628,182 13.45% 2006-06 11,360,623 11,118,399 97.87% 797,364 11,915,763 106.89% 1,854,243 16.32% 2004-05 10,576,870 9,740,819 92.09% 537,362 10,277,981 97.17% 1,849,194 17.48% 2003-04 9.070.812 8,274,805 91.22% 324,217 8,599,022 94.80% 1,772,141 19.54% 2002-03 8,989,461 8,108,975 90.18% 361,604 8,468,579 94.21% 1,853,569 20.62% 2001-02 9,760,635 8,957,849 91.78% 407,972 9,365,821 95.96% 1,481,506 15.18% 2000-01 9,105,631 8,381,781 92.05% 439,386 8,821,167 96.88% 1,290,814 14.18% (1) Exclusive of penalties and interest ..!.., 01 ' Fiscal Real Personal Year Estate (1) Property 2009-10 $ 1,181,352,276 $ 224,871,200 $ 2008-09 1,153,488,246 239,254,757 2007-08 1,130,643,127 243,837,948 2006-07 931,095,586 152,418,7 44 2005-06 927,558,386 241 ,849,424 2004-05 905,496,7 46 220,786,936 2003-04 885,323,887 205,377,101 2002-03 842,179,548 114,427,984 2001-02 810,877,087 199,122,212 2000-01 693,154,045 174,082,673 1999-00 682,080,389 205,617,833 (1) Real estate is assessed at 1 00% of fair market value. County of Russell, Virginia Assessed Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years Machinery and Merchant's Tools Capital 96,552,183 $ 5,402,115 $ 93,960,621 5,501,882 107,205,468 5,742,600 99,124,678 4,954,226 92,859,770 5,113,134 102,287,891 4,160,621 77,287,167 3,438,802 78,930,645 3,051,245 67,692,057 2,978,115 68,630,472 2,788,937 77,018,308 3,405,765 (2) Assessed values are established by the State Corporation Commission-includes all property types. Table 6 Mobile Public Homes Service (2) Total 22,864,821 $ 253,750,196 $ 1,784,792,791 23,139,220 234,196,018 1,749,540,744 23,608,064 231,981,492 1,743,018,699 23,802,666 199,922,460 1,411,318,360 26,020,997 206,306,945 1,499,708,656 24,774,536 222,627,640 1 ,480,134,370 23,763,122 226,411' 983 1,421,602,062 24,231,179 226,477,438 1,289,298,039 22,720,856 227,820,417 1,331,210,744 18,014,620 195,932,118 1 '152,602,865 17,458,675 206,155,148 1,191,736,118 “or County of Russell, Virginia Assessed Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years Table 6 Machinery Fiscal Real Personal and Merchant's, Mobiie Public Year Estate (1) Property Tools Capital Homes Service (2) Total 2008-10 § — 1,181,352,276 $ 224,871,200 $ 96,552,183 $ 5402.18 22,864,821 $ 263,750,196 § — 1,784,792,791 2008-09 4,153,488,246 239,254,757 93,960,621 5,501,882 23,139,220 234,196,018 4,749,540,744 2007-08 1,130,643,127 243,837,948 107,205,468 5,742,600 23,608,064 231,981,492 1,743,018,699 2006-07 931,095,586 152,418,744 99,124,678 4,954,226 23,802,666 199,922,460 1,411,318,360 2005-06 927,558,386 241,849,424 92,859,770 5,113,134 26,020,997 206,306,945 1,499,708,656, 2004-05, 905,496,746 220,786,936 102,287,891 4,160,621 24,774,536 222,627,840 1,480,134,370 2003-04 885,323,887 205,377,101 77,287,167 3,438,802 23,763,122 226,411,983, 1,421,602,062 2002-03 842,179,548 114,427,984 78,930,645 3,081,245 24,231,179 228,877,438 1,289,298,039 2001-02 810,877,087 199,122,212 67,692,057 2,978,115 22,120,856 21,820,417 41,331,210,744 2000-01, 693,154,045 174,082,673 68,690,472 2,788,937 18,014,620 195,932,118 1,182,602,865, 1999-00 682,080,389 205,617,833 77,018,308 3,405,765 17,458,675 206,155,148 1,194,736,118 (1) Realestate is assessed at 100% of far market value (2) Assessed values ate established by the State Corporation Commission-incudes all property types. Fiscal Real Year Estate 2009-10 $ 0.61 $ 2008-09 0.61 2007-08(3) 0.56/0.61 2006-07(2) 0.65/0.56 2005-06 0.65 2004-05 0.60 2003-04 0.60 2002-03 0.55 2001-02 0.55 2000-01 0.64 (1) Per $100 of assessed value. (2) 2nd half 2006/1 st half 2007 (3) 2nd half 2007/1 st half 2008 County of Russell, Virginia Property Tax Rates (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Personal Machinery Property & Tools 1.65 $ 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.45 2.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 -76- $ Table 7 Merchant's Mobile Capital Homes 0.65 $ 0.61 0.65 0.61 0.65 0.56 NA 0.64 NA 0.64 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA County of Russell, Virginia Property Tax Rates (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Table 7 Fiscal Real Personal Machinery Merchants Mobile Year Estate Propet & Tools Capital Homes 2009-10 061 $ 165 $ 1.65 § 0.65 $ 0.61 2008-09 0.61 1.65 1.65 0.65 0.61 2007-083) 0.56/0.61 185 1.85 0.85 058 2008-072) 0.65/0.56 1.65 1.85 NA 064 2005-06 085 1.65 1.65 NA 064 2004.05 0.60 4.45 245 NA NA 2003-04 0.60 1.45 445 NA NA 2002-03 0.55 145 1.45 NA NA 2001-02 0.55 1.45 1.45 NA NA 2000-01 0.64 1.45 1.45 NA NA (1) Per $100 of assessed value. (2) 2nd half 2006/1st half 2007 (3) 2nd half 2007/'st half 2008 T6- Table 8 County of Russell, Virginia Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Last Ten Fiscal Years Ratio of Net Bonded Net Assessed Gross Net Debt to Bonded Fiscal Value (in Bonded Bonded Assessed Debt per Year Population (1) thousands) (2) Debt (3) Debt Value Capita 2009-10 28,790 $ 1,784,793 $ 20,863,604 $ 20,863,604 1.17% $ 725 2008-09 28,790 1,749,541 20,684,197 20,684,197 1.18% 718 2007-08 28,790 1,743,019 19,834,689 19,834,689 1.14% 689 2006-07 28,790 1,411,318 14,836,861 14,836,861 1.05% 515 2005-06 28,790 1,499,709 12,594,094 12,594,094 0.84% 437 2004-05 28,830 1 ,480,134 13,633,304 13,633,304 0.92% 473 2003-04 28,795 1,421,602 14,670,561 14,670,561 1.03% 509 2002-03 28,940 1,289,298 15,770,006 15,770,006 1.22% 545 2001-02 28,944 1,331,211 12,408,937 12,408,937 0.93% 429 2000-01 29,071 1 '152,603 13,293,135 13,293,135 1.15% 457 (1) Bureau of the Census (2) Real property assessed at 100% of the fair market value. (3) Includes all long-term general obligation bonded debt, bonded anticipation notes, and literary fund loans. Excludes revenue bonds, landfill closure/post-closure care liability, capital leases, and compensated absences. -77- Tables County of Russell, Virginia Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Last Ten Fiscal Years Ratio of Net Bonded Net Assessed Gross Net Debt to Bonded Fiscal Value (in Bonded Bonded Assessed Debt per Year Population (1) thousands) (2) Debt (3) Debt Value Capita 2009-10 28,790 $ 1,784,793 § 20,863,604 $ 20,863,604 117% § 725 2008-08 28,790 1,749,541 20,684,197 20,684,197 1.18% 718 2007-08 28,790 1,743,019 19,834,689 19,834,689 1.14% 689 2006-07 28,790 1,441,318 14,836,864 14,836,864 1.05% 515 2006-06, 28,790 1,499,708 12,594,094 12,594,094 0.84% 437 2004-05, 28,830 41,480,434 13,633,304 13,633,304 0.92% 473 2008-04 28,795 4,421,602 14,870,564 14,670,561 1.03% 509 2002-03, 28,940 1,289,298, 18,770,008 18,770,006 1.20% 545, 2001-02 28,944 1,831,211 12,408,937 12,408,937 0.93% 429 2000-01 29074 4,182,603, 13,203,135 13,203,135, 1.15% 457 (1) Bureau of the Census (2) Real property assessed at 100% ofthe fair market value (3) Ince alliong-term general obigation bonded debt, bonded antcipation notes, and iterary fund loans. Excludes revenue bonds, lanl cosure/post-closure care liailty, capital leases, and compensated absences. T7- Table 9 County of Russell, Virginia Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Governmental Expenditures (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Ratio of Total Debt Service Total General to General Fiscal Debt Governmental Governmental Year Service Expenditures Expenditures 2009-10 $ 2,504,631 $ 66,185,342 3.78% 2008-09 2,547,424 70,616,832 3.61% 2007-08 2,669,081 66,777,351 4.00% 2006-07 2,429,487 65,517,828 3.71% 2005-06 2,546,073 66,468,920 3.83% 2004-05 1,775,036 56,151,677 3.16% 2003-04 1,742,481 52,479,334 3.32% 2002-03 1,658,923 48,181,088 3.44% 2001-02 1,939,714 48,530,195 4.00% 2000-01 1,790,670 48,142,948 3.72% (1) Includes all governmental funds of the Primary Government and Special Revenue funds of the Discretely Presented Component Unit-School Board. -78- Table 9 County of Russell, Virginia tio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Governmental Expenditures (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Ratio of Total Debi Service Total General to General Fisoal Debt Governmental Governmental Year Servioe Expenditures Expenditures 2008-10 $ 2804631 § 65,185,942 3.78% 2008-09 2,547,424 70,616.832 3.61% 2007-08 2,069,081 66,777,351 4.00% 2006-07 2,429,487 65517.828 3.71% 2005-06 2,548,073 66,468,920 3.83% 2004-05 4,775,036 56,151,677 3.18% 2008-04 4,742,484 52,479,334 3.82% 2002-08 4,658,923, 48,181,088 3.44% 2001-02 1,999,714 48,530,195 4.00% 2000-01 1,790,670 48,142,948 3.72% {1) Includes all governmental funds of the Primary Government and Special Revenue funds of the Discretely Presented Component Unit-School Board. COMPLIANCE SECTION COMPLIANCE SECTION ROJB][NSON, F ARMJER, Cox Assoc][ATJES CERTIFiED PUBliC ACCOUNTANTS A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED IJABllJTY COMPANY REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the Members of the Board of Supervisors County of Russell, Virginia Lebanon, Virginia We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Russell, Virginia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprise the County of Russell, Virginia's basic financial statements and have issued our report thereon dated January 26, 2011, which was qualified due to scope limitations. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; Specifications for Audits of Counties, Cities, and Towns, issued by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses and therefore, there can be no assurance that all deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses have been identified. However, as described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs, we identified certain deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. We consider the deficiency described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs to be material weakness 2010-1. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the County of Russell, Virginia's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests -79- ROBINSON, FARMER, COX ASSOCIATES (CERTIFUED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS "A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the Members of the Board of Supervisors County of Russell, Virginia Lebanon, Virginia We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Russell, Virginia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprise the County of Russell, Virginia's basic financial statemients and have issued our report thereon dated January 26, 2011, which was qualified due to scope limitations. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; Specifications for Audits of Counties, Cities, and Towns, issued by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of intemal controt over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses and therefore, there can be no assurance that all deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses have been identified. However, as described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs, we identified certain deficiencies in intemal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. We consider the deficiency described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned cosis to be material weakness 2010-1. Compliance and Other Matters AAs part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the County of Russell, Virginia's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts, However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests -79- disclosed an instance of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards and which are described in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs as item 2010-2. We noted certain matters that we reported to management of the County of Russell, Virginia, in a separate letter dated January 26, 2011. The County of Russell, Virginia's responses to the findings identified in our audit are described in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs. We did not audit the County of Russell, Virginia's responses and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the Board of Supervisors, others within the entity, and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. if?~~,~~ /,c~oa·~ Christiansburg, Virginia January 26, 2011 -80- disclosed an instance of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Goverment Auditing Standards and which are described in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs as item 2010-2. ‘We noted certain matters that we reported to management of the County of Russell, Virginia, in a separate letter daied January 26, 2011, ‘The County of Russell, Virginia's responses to the findings identified in our audit are described in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs. We did not audit the County of Russell, Virginia's responses and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the Board of Supervisors, others within the entity, and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Hateimoen, Saomar, py Chsocittes- Christiansburg, Virginia January 26, 2011 -80- ROBINSON, FARMER, COX ASSOCIATES CI:Rllf1ED PUBLTC ACCOUNTANTS A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LTABTLTTY COMPANY Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance with OMS Circular A-133 Independent Auditors' Report To the Board of Supervisors County of Russell, Virginia Lebanon, Virginia Compliance We have audited the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the County of Russell, Virginia's major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2010. The County of Russell, Virginia's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibility of the County of Russell, Virginia's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with those requirements. As described in item 2010-3 in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs, we were unable to obtain audited financial statements of the local Workforce Investment Board that administers the Workforce Investment Act Cluster (CFDA 17.258, 17.259, 17.260) on behalf of the County. The County serves as the grant recipient, however all funds are remitted directly to the Workforce Investment Board from the Commonwealth of Virginia. Aside from requiring an annual audit of the Workforce Investment Board, the County does not have a process in place to monitor the Board's performance in relation to this grant. The Workforce Investment Board has not completed audits for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2007, June 30, 2008, June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2010. As such, we were unable to obtain sufficient documentation supporting the compliance of the County of Russell, Virginia (via the Workforce Investment Board) regarding all applicable compliance requirements, nor were we able to satisfy ourselves as to the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with those requirements by other auditing procedures. As described in item 2010-4 in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses and questioned costs, the County of Russell, Virginia did not comply with requirements regarding Davis Bacon Act that are applicable to its ARRA - State Fiscal Stabilization Funds. Compliance with such requirements is necessary, in our opinion, for the -81- ROBINSON, FARMER, COX ASSOCIATES ‘CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS “A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 Independent Auditors’ Report To the Board of Supervisors County of Russell, Virginia Lebanon, Virginia Compliance We have audited the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the County of Russell, Virginia's major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2010. The County of Russell, Virginia's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibilty of the County of Russell, Virginia's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with those requirements. ‘As described in item 2010-3 in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs, we were unable to obtain audited financial statements of the local Workforce Investment Board that administers the Workforce Investment Act Cluster (CFDA 17.258, 17.259, 17.260) on behalf of the County. The County serves as the grant recipient, however all funds are remitted directly to the Workforce Investment Board from the Commonwealth of Virginia. Aside from requiring an annual audit of the Workforce Investment Board, the County does not have a process in place to monitor the Board's performance in relation to this grant. The Workforce Investment Board has not completed audits for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2007, June 30, 2008, June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2010. As such, we were unable to obtain sufficient documentation supporting the compliance of the County of Russell, Virginia (via the Workforce Investment Board) regarding all applicable compliance requirements, nor were we able to satisfy ourselves as to the County of Russell, Virginia's compliance with those requirements by other auditing procedures. As described in item 2010-4 in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses and questioned costs, the County of Russell, Virginia did not comply with requirements regarding Davis Bacon Act that are applicable to its ARRA - State Fiscal Stabilization Funds. Compliance with such requirements is necessary, in our opinion, for the 81. County of Russell, Virginia to comply with the requirements applicable to that program. In our opinion, except for the noncompliance described in the preceding paragraphs, the County of Russell, Virginia complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30,2010. Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the County of Russell, Virginia is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program to determine the auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control over compliance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses and therefore, there can be no assurance that all deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses have been identified. However, as discussed below, we identified certain deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. We consider the deficiencies in internal control over compliance described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as items 2010-3 and 2010-4 to be material weaknesses. The County of Russell, Virginia's responses to the findings identified in our audit are described in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs. We did not audit the County of Russell, Virginia's responses and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the responses. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, Board of Supervisors, others within the entity, federal awarding agencies, and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. i'f~mt, ~~ '~tJa~ Christiansburg, Virginia January 26, 2011 -82- County of Russell, Virginia to comply with the requirements applicable to that program. In our opinion, except for the noncompliance described in the preceding paragraphs, the County of Russell, Virginia complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referted to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2010. Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the County of Russell, Virginia is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County of Russell, Virginia's internal control ‘over compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program to determine the auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report ‘on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Russell, Virgiia’s internal control over compliance. Our consideration of intemal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph and was not designed to identity all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses and therefore, there can be no assurance that all deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses have been identified. However, as discussed below, we identified certain deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. ‘A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in intemal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in intemal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis, We consider the deficiencies in internal control over compliance described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as items 2010-3 and 2010-4 to be material weaknesses. The County of Russell, Virginia's responses to the findings identified in our audit are described in the accompanying schedule of findings, responses, and questioned costs. We did not audit the County of Russell, Virginia's responses and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the responses, This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, Board of Supervisors, others within the entity, federal awarding agencies, and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Hsteinson,, Gaoman, lay Cssocictes- Christiansburg, Virginia January 26, 2011 -82- County ol Russell, Virginia Page 1 of3 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards For the Year Ended June 30,2010 Pass-through Federal Entity Federal Grantor/State Pass • Through Grantor/ CFOA Identifying Federal Program Cluster or Title Number Number Expenditures Departmer~t or Health and Humar1 Services: Pass Through Payments: Departmer1l of Social Services: Promoting Safe and Stable Families 93.556 90249, 90359, 90360, 90361 s 26,279 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (T ANF) 93.558 90109, 90110, 90111' 90112 647,095 90127, 90229, 90230, 90231 90232, 90247, 90365, 90366 90367, 90377, 90603, 90621 Refugee and Entrant Assistance· Slate Administered Programs 93.566 90113,90233 796 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance 93.568 90114,90115,90234,90235 20,887 Child Care and Development Fund Cluster: Child Care and Development Block Grant 93.575 90545 16,092 ARRA • Child Care and Development Block Grant 93.713 90529, 90540, 90541' 90545 7,798 Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the 93.596 90116,90117,90118,90119 69,047 Child Care and Development Fund 90236, 90237, 90238, 90239 90529, 90540, 90541 Child Welfare Services · Slate Grants 93.645 90251 1,352 Foster Care· Title IV-E 93.658 90105,90106,90107,90209 391,992 90225, 90226, 90227, 90253 90258, 90636, 90637, 90639 90657, 90658 ARRA- Foster Care- Title IV-E 93.658 90636, 90637, 90639, 90657 35,388 90658 Adoption Assistance 93.659 90108, 90214, 90228, 90606 54,327 90627 ARRA- Adoption Assistance 93.659 90606 5,277 Soc1al Services Block Grant 93.667 90120,90122,90123,90124 174,104 90125, 90126, 90240, 90242 90243, 90244, 90245, 90246 90262,90312,90313,90332 90338, 90340, 90358, 90379 Chafee Foster Care Independence Program 96.674 90254, 90356 8,029 Children's Health Insurance Program 93.767 90102, 90222 15,269 Medical Assistance Program 93.778 90101,90146,90213,90221 194,995 90266 Total Department of Health and Human Services $ 1,668,727 Department of Agriculture: Pass Through Payments: Department of Agriculture: Child Nutrition Cluster: Food Distribution-Schools (Note 3) 10.555 Not applicable s 106,824 Department of Education: Child Nutrition Cluster: National School Breakfast Program 10.553 40591 272,420 National School Lunch Program 10.555 40623 850,585 ARRA- National School Lunch Program Equipment 10.579 40592 30,318 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program 10.582 40599 6,674 Department of Social Services: SNAP Cluster: State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental 10.561 90103,90104,90212,90223 333,777 Nutrition Assistance Program 90224 ARRA- State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental 10.561 90103,90104,90212,90223 3,750 Nutrition Assistance Program 90224 Total Department of Agriculture 1,604,348 -83- ounty of uss, Virginia Pago ot Schedule of Expenatures of Feral Awards Forth Year Ended Jura 30,2010, Pasesnrough Fectral Entity Federal Geantorsata Pass-Through Grate! orDA entiying erat Prop Gtr Tie umber Numer Exgonctres Depsient ot Heath an Human Sarces: Pass Thugh Payers Depatnani ol Sol Sees: ‘Prong Sie are Sable Faris ee ‘Tenparary Aosinos or Nos Farben TANF) 98556 08, coro, spt, nie 687085 soir, size, 922080284, Boe, 0247, 90985 308 5057, 9087, 6a, 8082, ‘auge ent EntantAsilence Slt Adninisled Prorans ans sot, 90238 Lonsteome Hemet nagy Asstance 58556 9014 S015, 91254, 0285, (tid Catered Devaoorent Fund Duster (Ch Cae sn Deepen ick rat 3575 God RRA. Ci Cand Developmen Bock Grant 758604 S060, B54, 0585, (ht Cate Many ae ching Fars ote 95586 16 c0r7, 90018 ene (hie Care a6 Deepen Fins 5126, 257, 9228, 8028 50525, 0, 9584 ‘hi eta Senses Ste Gras sais ast tae sls Caro TeV 58856 905 gots, sbi, szn8 swig sz, uz, 90227, 90253 80258, os, 90887, 90699 0657, 0658 -ARRA. Foster Cre The N-E 856 5005, S067, 9068, 0887 88 esd Acopn Assistance 3058 S108 904, ote, 0808 sar 0ea7 ARPA. Acopln Asisneo suas eos san Steal Serves Beek Grant, ‘8867 rz ootz, 90128 012s 7404 eas, 01, cen, se ez, ope, 25,90 5026, 9082, 90518 90382 508, to, 90988, 80078 ‘ale Fotr Care nopensonce Program soon a, 586 008 ‘Chicas Hath lswarce Progam 38767 one, 0222 13209 ail Aesance Progr, 55776 oro}, ses 92,0221 194985 ‘es Tl Dopartnat ot Hea Hun Senices 1988727 Departmen of Apel: ass Trough Payrens: Donate of Agree Chianaion cha Fao isn Shoo (Nae) 10585 tape Soa Depart of actor: Chis Muse Cer Naioa ence Bestest Progen 10553 eg 272420 Natal etc! Le Pega 10585 23 50585 RRA. Nara Schaal Lune Program Egret 10579 se mai6 Fresh Fa nd Voge Progam see 9 can Depart of Soil Sees SP Cus Sie AtminsabeMalsing rans ore Superenat 051 onto, ia, sate 80203 ss” ‘nen Asiteoe Progam ca8 ABBA Sl Aiiave Maching Gas ote Supplements soset soto oro, sera soa 370 ‘aon Asis Prepam cat ‘To Deprertt Agee Siem County of Russell, Virginia Page 2 of 3 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards For the Year Ended June 30,2010 Pass-through Federal Entity Federal Grantor/State Pass· Through Grantor/ CFDA Identifying Federal Program Cluster or Title Number Number Expenditures (Continued) Department of Justice: Pass Through Payments· Department of Criminal Justice Services: Violence Against Women Formula Grants 16.588 08WFAX0050 $ 19,530 09WFAX0037 ARRA- Stop Violence Againsl Women Formula Grants 16.588 09EFS60025 27,093 Total Department of Criminal Justice Services-pass through 46,623 Compensation Board: ARRA- Edward Byme Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program 16.803 09SUB9033 $ 72.946 Total Department of Justice s 119,569 Department ofT ransportation: Pass Through Payments: Department of Motor Vehicles· State and Community Highway Safety (402 Funds) 20600 AL-2010 50321 3941 $ 3,720 SC-2009 59295 3598 Department of Emergency Management: Interagency Hazardous Materials Public Sector Training and Planning Grants 20.703 52609 3,842 Total Department of Transportation $ 7,562 Department of Education: Pass Through Payments: Department of Education: Adult Education - Basic Grants to States 84.002 42801,61111 250,726 Title I Cluster: Title 1: Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.010 42901' 42999 1,336,504 ARRA- Tille 1· Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.389 42913 295,710 Special Education Cluster: Special Education - Grants to Stales 84.027 43071 913,016 ARRA- Special Education -Grants to States 84.391 61245 390,652 Special Education - Preschool Grants 84.173 62521 35,825 Career and Technical Education: Basic Grants to States 84.048 61095 101,391 Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities- State Grants 84.186 60511 5,005 Even Start- State Educational Agencies 84.213 42950, 86603 233,098 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers 84.287 60565 985,091 Readinesss and Emergency Management for Schools Program 84.184E 64,067 Education Technology Stale Grants 84.318 61600 26,558 ARRA- Education Technology State Grants 84.386 60897 19,750 Reading First State Grants 84.357 60655 57,056 Rural Education 84.358 43481 22,355 ARRA- State Fiscal Stabilization Funds - Educational Stale Grants 84.394 62532 1,203,591 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants 84.367 61480 334,477 Total Department of Education $ 6,274,972 Deparbnent of Housing and Urban Development: Pass Through Payments: Deparbnent of Housing and Community Development: Community Development Block Grant 14.228 50797, 50799 $ 244,084 National Endowment for the Arts· Pass Through Payments: Virginia Commission for the Arts: Promotion of the Arts Partnership Agreements 45.025 99910 4,000 Corporation for National Community Service: Pass Through Payments: Department of Education: Learn and Serve America- School and Community Based Programs 94.004 60185 $ 24,150 -84- County of Russ, Vega ‘Schodul of Expestre of Feral Avards Forth Year Ended June 30,2010, Page2ot3 Pasettrough Feterat Entity Federal Grantostat Pass-Through Grote ‘FDA loettyng Fete! Program Custer oT umber Number Expentures (Conieves Deparment of size: ass Trough Payents: para Cerin usceSences ‘ier Aga! Worn Forma Gaal 15588 wr ax0s0 S980 ewes ARRA. Sp Vidor Agia Women Formule als 13538 wEFSeoNes 210083 Tol Dope Cin! use Senice pas trowgh 583 ‘onpesaon Boar "AREA. Edvard Bye Marat uses Assan Gran Paya ae ess s_ma16 Tale patra of toe 19880 Depart of renee: Pass Tron Payers: Depron of tr Visas: ‘So an Communty Highway Slay (02 Funds) 20600 L200 ssz1 sot 37m ‘5070 Sea 88 Degatent of Emagen Managenant: Ineragoney Harari Male Puc Sco Taig an Plain Gras 20708 508 soe “Te Dearne Tenspatiton 1582 Depatnent of Eaton: as To.gh Payers Deparment of Eceton Au Eucla Gan Stes x00 ace, 6115 sma Ti Out Tie CranisoLoa cesta gens axot0 1,290 ‘guge04 AREA. Tile Gas o LoralEevetona Agence 4s aS ‘as Spi Eastin Cua Speci Euan - Gras Stas ex0ar sant 13016 -ARRA. Speed Eoveton- Cease Sias ease eis 0352 Spe Even - Prec Grane au173 2821 52 ar Tete Etec: Bae Cran Silos 84048 085 101381 Salen Ou Fre cons and Communion - Sta Gels 84105 eoeit 5005 Even Sa Sao Edvatal Agee 24213 650, 5803 230% ToatyFit Contry ConmuniyLeanirg Caries 34267 0885 85081, eesinets and Enageny Meagan a eno Progr Ae 4057 Etucaton Teco Sia Gris 318 seen 2588 RRA. Eden Tesolagy Sta Grats 35 ‘0887 19780 eat Fst Site Gants 357 ss 51088 irl eaten 8 ‘ve 2388 AREA Sil Feral Statileon Funds - Elona Sale Grn ey 582 ‘208881 roeg Tear Oly Sine rans 387 cra Sear? “oa Dapartnortt Edn apie ‘eparrent of Hung ant idan Doveapent Pas Though Payers epatnerof Husg and Community Doeopant Conny Deveopmert Bec Grek 14228 ser. 0729 $s neous ton Endooret re At: Pass Tru Panes ‘Vegi Gans rho et ‘Proraton ale As Parveen Aearant 25005 se sso Copan atl Commanty Serie: Pass Tough Payents ‘sparta of Eeson: Lean and Seve Aner Scheel and Corman Based Pron ot es sms0 County of Russell, Virginia Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards For the Year Ended June 30, 2010 Federal Grantor/State Pass ·Through Grantor/ Program Cluster or Title Federal CFOA Number (Continued) Oepartmenl of labor: Pass Through Payments: Oepartmenl of Education: Workforce Investment Act Cluster: WIA Youth Activities WIA Adult Program Total Department of labor U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Pass Through Payments: Department of Emergency Management: State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) Emergency Management Performance Grant Total U.S. Department of Homeland Security Total Federal Expenditures of Federal Awards Note 1 -- Basis of Presentation 17 259 17.258 97.073 97.042 Pass-through Entity Identifying Number 86713 86712 52708 52749 Federal Expenditures $ $ s 11,197 57,000 68,197 54,750 6,769 $ 61,519 $ 10,077,128 The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards {the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Russell County, Virginia under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2010. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Russell County, Virginia, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Russell County, Virginia. Note 2 ·- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (1) Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in OMS Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. (2) Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. Note 3 -- Food Distribution Nonmonetary assistance is reported in the schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received and disbursed. At June 30, 2010 Russell County, Virginia had food commodities totaling $0 in inventory Note 4 ·· Subrecipients Of the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule, Russell County, Virginia provided federal awards to subrecipients as follows: CFDA Number Prooram Name Amount 14.228 Community Development Block Grant $ 168,820 The County of Russell serves as the grant recipient for the Workforce Investment Act Cluster (WIA) CFDA numbers 17.258, 17.259, and 17.260. Funds are delivered direcUy to the subrecipient (local Workforce Investment Board) through the Virginia Employment Commission. The Workforce Investment Board did not produce an audit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 and therefore no amounts are available for presentation herein related to the program See schedule of findings, responses and questioned costs for additional information. Note 5 -- Relationship to the Financial Statements Federal expenditures, revenues and capital contributions are reported in the County's basic financial statements as follows: Intergovernmental federal revenues per the basic financial statements: Primary government: General Fund $ 2,442,988 Component Unit Schools: School Operating Fund 7,634,140 Total federal expenditures per the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards $ 10,077,128 -85- Page 3 of3 ‘County of Russe, Vigna Schedule of Expenstres of Federal Awards Forth YearEnded June 32000, Pasetrough Federal ty Federal Granortete Pats - Trough Grant rOA, eenting Fetes! Progam Guster or Tile urbe Number Expenditures {Contnuet) Depotnan tbe: Pass Tough Payments: Depart Eda: ‘Wolke nesta at sie ‘WIA Yeu ties 17289 3 some {Maa Progam 17238 2 Tole Department Labor sar US, Depron Homans Secu Pass Though Paynes ‘partment Erergency Manage ‘Se Homan Seu Pega (SHSP) sro7s 57708 5 tt EmsgenyHanepement Pestmenc Gran 02 508 53 Total US, Deparment of Homer Secnty sas “Told Fees penis Feral Ais $997.18 Nott Bas of revertation The sesarpsnyig shel of expense firs awards ho Schein he ore rant acto Fuss Cun, Vii under rogram fo feral oven fr yo endo Je 0, ZO. The nate ns Schetue pesos in zcrcsne wih fe regan of OME Grol 13, ‘Aus of Stes, Loc! Coveramens, a Non Po Orgarzaone. cau to Sehedde pect cly called grin of he coatalre ol assel Co, ‘Vapi, is tne oa oes ot presen tern positon cheges nl asst, or cash ows Rusa Cau, Vig ‘Noe 2--Surmay of Sica ossuning Plies (*) pecs repre ne Seneca epson Be ca base anxunng, Such expenses a eons owing Be cos picfles cama OMG Cle A122, Cas Pras foc Non-Pro Crgatizsos, wer carn yes expen aol lowe cris 2 ‘eenboeeran (2) Pass streagh ry tethjing manasa rosea are abi te Foot Dison Nonna eaitence aorta hace ae alt are vl fhe canes reed and dsb, Aue 0, 2010 seal County, Vigil aed corse srg Si inven. No Subeiiants ‘ft deal anges peor ine Schad, Russel Cony, Vega poi ode swans lo ube 8 ons (CeDANenber Pronanane Anau 14238 ena Daveopent ek Crt se80 The Counly of Rusa eeves athe int eet the Woes Isnt Act Cie (HU) CFDA meters 1.258, 17.259, an 17.280. Furs ee «elves eet loth versie Lea Wares nese oad ivcgh te Vigna Eoymar Corson. The Wore resent Boa ot rede ana ote fa yar ntng June 20,200 anette no amounts all presen herein ata of progam. Se sche of Teg, sponses td quosionod ests orale inoralon. Note ~Rolaonstip ote Frac Stores Fedo expres, oveuts ae copa cota eer ine Couns bas acl tates slows Intrgoveraril oferclevnon othe basic fara sae: Pinay goverment Gone fund 296 ‘omg Uni Shek: ‘Sted Operating Fund sano Tot ote expends pre Shetlands ct Fea ards 5 morn Pagoda County of Russell, Virginia Schedule of Findings, Responses and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2010 Section I- Summary of Auditor's Results Financial Statements Type of auditor's report issued: Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified? Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? Federal Awards Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified? Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs: Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Circular A-133, Section .510 (a)? Identification of major programs: CFDA# 84.173/84.027/84.391 Name of Federal Program or Cluster Special Education Cluster Title 1: Part A Cluster Unqualified Yes No Yes Yes No Qualified Yes 84.010/84.389 10.561 93.558 93.658 84.394 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cluster Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Foster Care- Title IV-E Cluster 10.553/10.555 17.258/17.259/17.260 ARRA- State Fiscal Stabilization Funds - Educational State Grants Child Nutrition Cluster Workforce Investment Act Cluster Dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs: Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee? -86- $302,314 No County of Russell, Virginia ‘Schedule of Findings, Responses and Questioned Costs ‘Year Ended June 30, 2010 Section |- Summary of Auditor's Results Financial Statements Type of auditor's report issued: Unqualified Internal control over financia! reporting: Material weakness(es) identified? Yes Significant deficiency(jes) identified? No Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? Yes Federal Awards Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified? Yes Significant deficiency(jes) identiled? No Type of auditors report issued on compliance for major programs: Qualified Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Circular A-133, Section .510 (a)? Yes Identtcation of major programs: CFDA # Name of Federal Program or Cluster 84.173/84,027/84.391 Special Education Cluster 84.010/84.389 Title 1: Part A Cluster 10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for he Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cluster 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 93.658 Foster Care - Tile IV-E Cluster 84,304 ARRA - State Fiscal Stabilization Funds - Educational State Grants 10.559/10.555 Child Nutrition Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.260 Workforce Investment Act Cluster Dolar threshold used fo distinguish between Type A and Type 8 programs: $302,314 Auditee qualified as low-risk ausitee? No -86- County of Russell, Virginia Schedule of Findings, Responses and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30,2010 Section II· Financial Statement Findings 2010-1 Criteria: Condition: Cause of Condition: Effect of Condition: Recommendation: Management's Response: 2010-2 Criteria: Condition: Cause of Condition: Effect of Condition: Recommendation: Management's Response: Per Statement on Auditing Standards 115 (SAS 115), identification of a material adjustment to the financial statements that was not detected by the entity's internal controls indicates that a material weakness exist. The financial statements, as presented for audit, did not contain all necessary adjustments to comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). As such, the auditor proposed adjustments that were material to the financial statements. The County does not have proper controls in place to notice and correct errors in closing their year end financial statements. There is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the County's financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by the County's internal controls over financial reporting. The County should review the auditors' proposed audit adjustments for 2010 and develop a plan to ensure the trial balances and related schedules are accurately presented for audit. The County will review the auditors' proposed audit adjustments for 2010 and will develop a plan of action to ensure that all adjusting entries are made prior to final audit fieldwork next year. The Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended requires that an appropriation exist prior to the expenditure of funds. The budgeting process for the County did not include the Department of Social Services. As such, anticipated expenditures were not included in the County's advertisement process and no appropriation of funds was given. The County had never budgeted to include the Department of Social Services in the past. The County has not met the requirements of the Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The County should budget to include appropriations for all necessary expenditures. Management will begin to include the Department of Social Services expenditures in all aspects of the budgeting process. In addition, management will post all appropriations in the County's accounting system and monitor expenditures against same. -87- County of Russell, Virginia Schedule of Findings, Respor Year Ended June 30, 2010 nses and Questioned Costs, Section II - Financial Statement Findings 2010-4 Criteria Per Statement on Auditing Standards 116 (SAS 115), identtication of a material adjustment to the financial statements that was not detected by the entity's intemal controls indicates that a material weakness exist. Condition The financial statements, as presented for audit, did not contain all necessary adjustments to comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). As such, the auditor proposed adjustments that were material tothe financial statements Cause of Condition: The County does not have proper controls in place to notice and correct errors in closing their year end financial statements. Effect of Condition: There is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the County’ financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by the County's internal controls over financial reporting Recommendation: The County should review the aucitors’ proposed audit adjustments for 2010 and develop a plan to ensure the trial balances and related schedules are accurately presented for audit. Managements The County will review the auditors’ proposed aucit adjustments for 2010 and will develop a plan of Response: action to ensure that all adjusting entries are made prior to final auit fieldwork next year 2010-2 Criteria: ‘The Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended requires that an appropriation exist prior to the expenditure of funds. Condition: The budgeting process for the County did not include the Department of Social Services. As such, anticipated expenditures were not included in the County's advertisement process and no ‘appropriation of funds was given. Cause of Condition: The County hed never budgeted to include the Department of Social Services in the past. Effect of Condition: The County has not met the requirements of the Code of Virainia, (1950), as amended. Recommendation: The County should budget to include appropriations forall necessary expenditures Managements Management will begin to include the Department of Social Services expenditures in all aspects of Response the budgeting process. In addition, management wil post all appropriations in the County's ~2ccounting system and monitor expenditures against same, -87- County of Russell, Virginia Schedule of Findings, Responses and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2010 Section Ill· Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Statement of Condition: Criteria: Effect: Recommendation: Statement of Condition: Criteria: Effect: Recommendation: Workforce Investment Act Cluster (WIA) · CFDA 17.258, 17.259, 17.260 Reporting: The County of Russell serves as the grant recipient for the WIA grant, however funds are remitted directly to the local Workforce Investment Board from the Commonwealth of Virginia. The County does not receive or disburse federal funds, however pursuant to their agreement with the State certain oversight functions are required of the County. Specifically, the County is required to monitor their subrecipient. To date, the County has relied on the Workforce Investment Board's annual audit, performed in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 to serve as documentation that the Workforce Investment Board has complied with requirements of the grant. The Workforce Investment Board has not completed an audit for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2007, June 30, 2008, June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2010. In addition, the County has not implemented other programs to monitor the Board's compliance with requirements of the Grant. The County, as the grant recipient, has the responsibility of monitoring their subrecipient's compliance with grant requirements. The subrecipient may not be in compliance with all grant requirements. The County should require that the subrecipient have the program audited annually and require that the annual audit be completed and finalized within 90 days of year end. ARRA ·State Fiscal Stabilization Funds· Educational State Grants· CFDA 84.394 Davis Bacon Act: The School Board did not receive weekly certified payrolls in conjunction with construction related to the schools. The Davis Bacon Act requires that all contractors and subcontractors performing on federal contracts in excess of $2,000 pay their laborers and mechanics not less than the prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits. Although the School Board received signed notifications from contractors agreeing to follow the Davis Bacon Act, without reviewing the certified payrolls as required, there is a likelihood the School Board is not in compliance with the Davis Bacon Act. The School Board should require the contractors and subcontractors to submit weekly certified payrolls and review to ensure they meet the required prevailing wage rate clauses in the agreements. Section IV· Status of Prior Audit Findings and Questioned Costs Financial Statement Findings 2009-1 and 2009-3 recurred during fiscal year 2010. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2009-5 recurred during fiscal year 2010. -88- County of Russell, Virginia ‘Schedule of Findings, Responses and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2010 Section Ill - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2010:3 Statement of Condition: Criteria Effect Recommendation: 2010-4 Statement of Condition: Criteria Effect: Recommendation: Section 1V - Status of Prior Workforce Investment Act Cluster (WIA) - CFDA 17.258, 17.259, 17.260 Reporting: The County of Russell serves as the grant recipient for the WIA grant, however funds are remitted directly o the local Workforce Investment Board from the Commonwealth of Virginia, The County does not receive or disburse federal funds, however pursuant to their agreement with the Slate certain oversight functions are required of the County. Specifically, the County is required to monitor their subrecipient. To date, the County has relied on the Workforce Investment Board's annual audit, performed in acoordance with OMB Circular A-133 to serve as documentation that the Workforce investment Board has complied with requirements ofthe grant. The Workforce Investment Board has not completed an audit for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2007, June 30, 2008, June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2010. in addition, the County has not implemented other programs to monitor the Board's compliance with requirements ofthe Grant. The County, as the grant recipient, has the responsibilty of monitoring their subrecipient’s compliance with grant requirements. The subrecipient may not be in compliance with all grant requirements, The County should require that the subrecipient have the program audited annually and require that the annual audit be completed and finalized within 90 days of year end, ARRA - State Fiscal Stabilization Funds - Educational State Grants - CFDA 84.304 Davis Bacon Act: The School Board did not receive weekly certified payrolls in conjunction with construction related to the schools. The Davis Bacon Act requires that all contractors and subcontractors performing on federal contracts in excess of $2,000 pay their laborers and mechanics not less than the prevaling wage rates and fringe benefits Although the Schoo! Board received signed notifications from contractors agreeing to follow the Davis Bacon Act, without reviewing the certified payrolls as required, there isa likelihood the ‘Schoo! Board is not in compliance with the Davis Bacon Act. ‘The School Board should require the contractors and subcontractors to submit weekly certied payrolls and review to ensure they meet the required prevaling wage rate clauses in the agreements. ‘Audit Findings and Questioned Costs Financial Statement Findings 2009-1 and 2009-3 recurred during fiscal year 2010. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2008-5 recurred during fiscal year 2010. -88-